Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced
| Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94260] |
Wed, 02 January 2008 10:01  |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
aid those stories of hookers dressing him in =
diapers=20
were not true. Boy, what do you do there? Are you supposed to take the =
word of a=20
politician over a hooker? It's a tough decision for people." --Jay=20
Leno<BR><BR>"Vitter's wife was by his side when he made the =
announcement. She=20
called the senator her 'best friend.' Unfortunately, his best friend is =
someone=20
named Thumper." --Jay Leno <BR><BR>"At his press conference yesterday, =
where he=20
admitted being involved with prostitutes, Louisiana Senator David Vitter =
apologized to his longtime supporters -- the working men and the working =
girls=20
of Louisiana." --Jay Leno<BR><BR>"Last night, down in Washington, DC, =
they had=20
the all-night Senate session. The senators were there all night. It was =
the DC=20
madam's slowest night ever." --David Letterman<BR><BR>"The darling of =
the=20
religious right, conservative Senator David Vitter of Louisiana, not =
only=20
admitted to having sex with prostitutes, he would pay them $300 to make =
him wear=20
diapers. And today that crazy astronaut called him 'my dream guy, he's =
got my=20
vote!" --Jay Leno<BR><BR>"Vitter put out a statement saying he only =
started=20
cheating on his wife after he started hanging out with the wrong crowd, =
you=20
know, Giuliani, Newt Gingrich, the mayor of LA." --Jay =
Leno<BR><BR>"David Vitter=20
has admitted he dates hookers in Washington, D.C., and also in =
Louisiana. He=20
said in his defense he always selected the girl who made the lowest bid, =
so he's=20
fiscally prudent." --David Letterman<BR><BR>"There's another one of =
those=20
prostitution scandals down there in Washington, DC. Louisiana Senator =
David=20
Vitter admitted that he's been visiting Washington area prostitutes. And =
I=20
thought about this, 'Whoa, wait a minute, a politician, paying for a =
hooker? I=20
didn't see that comin.'" --David Letterman <BR><BR>"But good for Vitter, =
he said=20
that it did not cost the taxpayers a cent. He pays for the hookers with =
his=20
bribe money." --David Letterman <BR><BR>"Well now more problems with =
this Vitter=20
guy. You gotta go on his website, he's like Mr. Religious, Mr. Family =
Values.=20
Well now a second madam has come forward and told the Associated Press =
that he=20
was also a customer at her brothel. This guy was cheating on his hooker =
with=20
another hooker." --Jay Leno<BR><BR>"And this madam says that Vitter was =
not only=20
having sex with the prostitutes -- this is unbelievable -- he would also =
pay=20
them to dress him up in a diaper. See, that's what you call a pampered=20
politician. And she also said today in an interview that he sometimes =
paid $300=20
an hour just to have the hookers talk to him because his wife didn't =
listen to=20
him. Well, I bet she's all ears now." --Jay Leno<BR><BR>"Republican =
Senator and=20
family values conservative -- that's what he calls himself -- Senator =
David=20
Vitter of Louisiana admitted he was a client of the so called DC Madam =
in=20
Washington. See, this is so wrong. At least use a hooker from your own =
state. I=20
mean they're gonna pump money into the economy, make it your own." --Jay =
Leno<BR><BR>"Family values conservative Republican Senator from =
Louisiana David=20
Vitter admitted he has had sex with prostitutes. Apparently years ago =
this=20
Senator Vitter guy had been seeing one of the DC Madam's escorts. You =
think the=20
Senator's embarrassed? How about the hooker? Now the whole world knows =
she had=20
sex with a politician, eww." --Jay Leno<BR><BR>"But he says he's not =
going to=20
talk about it out of respect for his wife, that's what he said today. =
It's all=20
these guys getting caught with hookers, they have this newfound respect =
for=20
their wife. Ya know something, when his pants were down around his =
ankles=20
leaving the motel, I don't see him going 'you know, I love my wife.' =
Well you=20
know what makes it especially hypocritical: apparently Vitter has been a =
strong=20
opponent of same-sex marriage, but today he explained that too. =
Apparently he's=20
against having sex with the person you're married to." --Jay Leno =
<BR><BR>"They=20
have prostitutes in Washington D.C., and it now turns out that senators =
and=20
congressmen and important, powerful people are dating the prostitutes. =
.... And=20
there's a senator from Louisiana, David Vitter, admitted he's been =
dating=20
prostitutes. And he was very generous with one girl, he paid her with a =
new=20
highway project in her home state. ... One thing I'll say for this guy =
from=20
Louisiana, this David Vitter, at least he went to a professional and =
left the=20
congressional pages alone." --David Letterman<BR><BR>"Right now, =
Washington, DC,=20
is in the grips and throws of a big prostitution ring sex scandal. =
High-powered=20
politicians going to visit prostitutes. The call girl agency had a =
slogan. The=20
slogan was 'We take care of you below the beltway'" --David=20
Letterman<BR><BR>"The Washington, D.C., madam has threatened to release =
more=20
names of Washington politicians who were her customers. ... She says =
another=20
member of the White House will be named very soon. This proves once =
again that=20
members of the Bush administration don't know when it's time to pull =
out." --Jay=20
Leno<BR><BR>"Politicians having sex with prostitutes? What's the matter? =
All of=20
a sudden, congressional pages aren't good enough anymore?" --David =
Letterman=20
<BR><BR>"There's a big scandal going on down in Washington, DC, with a=20
prostitution ring. ... Politicians were actually paying for sex. One =
girl got=20
paid with a military base in her home state." --David =
Letterman.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Will Client #9 get equal=20
time?</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C8837F.A23078B0--you know which Kim who you are.........;o)Short memory, eh? :^)
Did you forget about Bill Clinton? Leno is _still_ making hay out of his
sex scandal. Doesn't matter what party you're in, if you "screw up" in
office, jokes will fly.
Politicians make late night TV too easy sometimes. ;^)
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94261 is a reply to message #94260] |
Wed, 02 January 2008 11:30  |
|
|
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
Mr. Simplicity wrote:
> It will be interesting to see if the governor of New York gets equal
> time. Here are the late night barbs that were thrown at the Republican
> who got busted doing the same thing- note the charming political spins:
>
> "Louisiana Senator David Vitter held a press conference this week, where
> he admitted yes, he was a client of the DC madam, but he said those
> stories of hookers dressing him in diapers were not true. Boy, what do
> you do there? Are you supposed to take the word of a politician over a
> hooker? It's a tough decision for people." --Jay Leno
>
> "Vitter's wife was by his side when he made the announcement. She called
> the senator her 'best friend.' Unfortunately, his best friend is someone
> named Thumper." --Jay Leno
>
> "At his press conference yesterday, where he admitted being involved
> with prostitutes, Louisiana Senator David Vitter apologized to his
> longtime supporters -- the working men and the working girls of
> Louisiana." --Jay Leno
>
> "Last night, down in Washington, DC, they had the all-night Senate
> session. The senators were there all night. It was the DC madam's
> slowest night ever." --David Letterman
>
> "The darling of the religious right, conservative Senator David Vitter
> of Louisiana, not only admitted to having sex with prostitutes, he would
> pay them $300 to make him wear diapers. And today that crazy astronaut
> called him 'my dream guy, he's got my vote!" --Jay Leno
>
> "Vitter put out a statement saying he only started cheating on his wife
> after he started hanging out with the wrong crowd, you know, Giuliani,
> Newt Gingrich, the mayor of LA." --Jay Leno
>
> "David Vitter has admitted he dates hookers in Washington, D.C., and
> also in Louisiana. He said in his defense he always selected the girl
> who made the lowest bid, so he's fiscally prudent." --David Letterman
>
> "There's another one of those prostitution scandals down there in
> Washington, DC. Louisiana Senator David Vitter admitted that he's been
> visiting Washington area prostitutes. And I thought about this, 'Whoa,
> wait a minute, a politician, paying for a hooker? I didn't see that
> comin.'" --David Letterman
>
> "But good for Vitter, he said that it did not cost the taxpayers a cent.
> He pays for the hookers with his bribe money." --David Letterman
>
> "Well now more problems with this Vitter guy. You gotta go on his
> website, he's like Mr. Religious, Mr. Family Values. Well now a second
> madam has come forward and told the Associated Press that he was also a
> customer at her brothel. This guy was cheating on his hooker with
> another hooker." --Jay Leno
>
> "And this madam says that Vitter was not only having sex with the
> prostitutes -- this is unbelievable -- he would also pay them to dress
> him up in a diaper. See, that's what you call a pampered politician. And
> she also said today in an interview that he sometimes paid $300 an hour
> just to have the hookers talk to him because his wife didn't listen to
> him. Well, I bet she's all ears now." --Jay Leno
>
> "Republican Senator and family values conservative -- that's what he
> calls himself -- Senator David Vitter of Louisiana admitted he was a
> client of the so called DC Madam in Washington. See, this is so wrong.
> At least use a hooker from your own state. I mean they're gonna pump
> money into the economy, make it your own." --Jay Leno
>
> "Family values conservative Republican Senator from Louisiana David
> Vitter admitted he has had sex with prostitutes. Apparently years ago
> this Senator Vitter guy had been seeing one of the DC Madam's escorts.
> You think the Senator's embarrassed? How about the hooker? Now the whole
> world knows she had sex with a politician, eww." --Jay Leno
>
> "But he says he's not going to talk about it out of respect for his
> wife, that's what he said today. It's all these guys getting caught with
> hookers, they have this newfound respect for their wife. Ya know
> something, when his pants were down around his ankles leaving the motel,
> I don't see him going 'you know, I love my wife.' Well you know what
> makes it especially hypocritical: apparently Vitter has been a strong
> opponent of same-sex marriage, but today he explained that too.
> Apparently he's against having sex with the person you're married to."
> --Jay Leno
>
> "They have prostitutes in Washington D.C., and it now turns out that
> senators and congressmen and important, powerful people are dating the
> prostitutes. ... And there's a senator from Louisiana, David Vitter,
> admitted he's been dating prostitutes. And he was very generous with one
> girl, he paid her with a new highway project in her home state. ... One
> thing I'll say for this guy from Louisiana, this David Vitter, at least
> he went to a professional and left the congressional pages alone."
> --David Letterman
>
> "Right now, Washington, DC, is in the grips and throws of a big
> prostitution ring sex scandal. High-powered politicians going to visit
> prostitutes. The call girl agency had a slogan. The slogan was 'We take
> care of you below the beltway'" --David Letterman
>
> "The Washington, D.C., madam has threatened to release more names of
> Washington politicians who were her customers. ... She says another
> member of the White House will be named very soon. This proves once
> again that members of the Bush administration don't know when it's time
> to pull out." --Jay Leno
>
> "Politicians having sex with prostitutes? What's the matter? All of a
> sudden, congressional pages aren't good enough anymore?" --David Letterman
>
> "There's a big scandal going on down in Washington, DC, with a
> prostitution ring. ... Politicians were actually paying for sex. One
> girl got paid with a military base in her home state." --David Letterman.
>
>
> Will Client #9 get equal time?Well....if the Clintons would just do the right thing and slit their wrists,
they wouldn't be the brunt of so many jokes and we could all feel sorry for
them instead.......me.......I'd weep for at least few milliseconds. I'd
probably measure it though so I could somehow compensate for the latency so
I didn't really waste even a few milliseconds of my life feeling sorry for
the Clintons.
Regards,
Mr. Sunshine ;o)
"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:47d6f2a9@linux...
>
> Short memory, eh? :^)
>
> Did you forget about Bill Clinton? Len
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94262 is a reply to message #94260] |
Wed, 02 January 2008 11:34 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
o is _still_ making hay out of his
> sex scandal. Doesn't matter what party you're in, if you "screw up" in
> office, jokes will fly.
>
> Politicians make late night TV too easy sometimes. ;^)
>
> Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>
> Mr. Simplicity wrote:
>> It will be interesting to see if the governor of New York gets equal
>> time. Here are the late night barbs that were thrown at the Republican
>> who got busted doing the same thing- note the charming political spins:
>>
>> "Louisiana Senator David Vitter held a press conference this week, where
>> he admitted yes, he was a client of the DC madam, but he said those
>> stories of hookers dressing him in diapers were not true. Boy, what do
>> you do there? Are you supposed to take the word of a politician over a
>> hooker? It's a tough decision for people." --Jay Leno
>>
>> "Vitter's wife was by his side when he made the announcement. She called
>> the senator her 'best friend.' Unfortunately, his best friend is someone
>> named Thumper." --Jay Leno
>>
>> "At his press conference yesterday, where he admitted being involved with
>> prostitutes, Louisiana Senator David Vitter apologized to his longtime
>> supporters -- the working men and the working girls of Louisiana." --Jay
>> Leno
>>
>> "Last night, down in Washington, DC, they had the all-night Senate
>> session. The senators were there all night. It was the DC madam's slowest
>> night ever." --David Letterman
>>
>> "The darling of the religious right, conservative Senator David Vitter of
>> Louisiana, not only admitted to having sex with prostitutes, he would pay
>> them $300 to make him wear diapers. And today that crazy astronaut called
>> him 'my dream guy, he's got my vote!" --Jay Leno
>>
>> "Vitter put out a statement saying he only started cheating on his wife
>> after he started hanging out with the wrong crowd, you know, Giuliani,
>> Newt Gingrich, the mayor of LA." --Jay Leno
>>
>> "David Vitter has admitted he dates hookers in Washington, D.C., and also
>> in Louisiana. He said in his defense he always selected the girl who made
>> the lowest bid, so he's fiscally prudent." --David Letterman
>>
>> "There's another one of those prostitution scandals down there in
>> Washington, DC. Louisiana Senator David Vitter admitted that he's been
>> visiting Washington area prostitutes. And I thought about this, 'Whoa,
>> wait a minute, a politician, paying for a hooker? I didn't see that
>> comin.'" --David Letterman
>>
>> "But good for Vitter, he said that it did not cost the taxpayers a cent.
>> He pays for the hookers with his bribe money." --David Letterman
>>
>> "Well now more problems with this Vitter guy. You gotta go on his
>> website, he's like Mr. Religious, Mr. Family Values. Well now a second
>> madam has come forward and told the Associated Press that he was also a
>> customer at her brothel. This guy was cheating on his hooker with another
>> hooker." --Jay Leno
>>
>> "And this madam says that Vitter was not only having sex with the
>> prostitutes -- this is unbelievable -- he would also pay them to dress
>> him up in a diaper. See, that's what you call a pampered politician. And
>> she also said today in an interview that he sometimes paid $300 an hour
>> just to have the hookers talk to him because his wife didn't listen to
>> him. Well, I bet she's all ears now." --Jay Leno
>>
>> "Republican Senator and family values conservative -- that's what he
>> calls himself -- Senator David Vitter of Louisiana admitted he was a
>> client of the so called DC Madam in Washington. See, this is so wrong. At
>> least use a hooker from your own state. I mean they're gonna pump money
>> into the economy, make it your own." --Jay Leno
>>
>> "Family values conservative Republican Senator from Louisiana David
>> Vitter admitted he has had sex with prostitutes. Apparently years ago
>> this Senator Vitter guy had been seeing one of the DC Madam's escorts.
>> You think the Senator's embarrassed? How about the hooker? Now the whole
>> world knows she had sex with a politician, eww." --Jay Leno
>>
>> "But he says he's not going to talk about it out of respect for his wife,
>> that's what he said today. It's all these guys getting caught with
>> hookers, they have this newfound respect for their wife. Ya know
>> something, when his pants were down around his ankles leaving the motel,
>> I don't see him going 'you know, I love my wife.' Well you know what
>> makes it especially hypocritical: apparently Vitter has been a strong
>> opponent of same-sex marriage, but today he explained that too.
>> Apparently he's against having sex with the person you're married
>> to." --Jay Leno
>>
>> "They have prostitutes in Washington D.C., and it now turns out that
>> senators and congressmen and important, powerful people are dating the
>> prostitutes. ... And there's a senator from Louisiana, David Vitter,
>> admitted he's been dating prostitutes. And he was very generous with one
>> girl, he paid her with a new highway project in her home state. ... One
>> thing I'll say for this guy from Louisiana, this David Vitter, at least
>> he went to a professional and left the congressional pages
>> alone." --David Letterman
>>
>> "Right now, Washington, DC, is in the grips and throws of a big
>> prostitution ring sex scandal. High-powered politicians going to visit
>> prostitutes. The call girl agency had a slogan. The slogan was 'We take
>> care of you below the beltway'" --David Letterman
>>
>> "The Washington, D.C., madam has threatened to release more names of
>> Washington politicians who were her customers. ... She says another
>> member of the White House will be named very soon. This proves once again
>> that members of the Bush administration don't know when it's time to pull
>> out." --Jay Leno
>>
>> "Politicians having sex with prostitutes? What's the matter? All of a
>> sudden, congressional pages aren't good enough anymore?" --David
>> Letterman
>>
>> "There's a big scandal going on down in Washington, DC, with a
>> prostitution ring. ... Politicians were actually paying for sex. One girl
>> got paid with a military base in her home state." --David Letterman.
>> Will Client #9 get equal time?Dear Mike,
Are you talking about translating DSPFX algorithm tom Paris ?
I am talking about transl
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94264 is a reply to message #94261] |
Wed, 02 January 2008 10:54 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ome great ones like the Studioverb
>>and Optimizer etc...
>>These are DX plugins and need to be compiled to be used with their hardware
>>ISA DSPFX card.
>>Let me know.
>>I will py for that !
>>Regards,
>>Dimitrios
>>
>>"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi James,
>>>
>>>The emulator is called "Sheep Shaver". It runs as a Windows Program.
>It
>>>wont run PARIS because it has limited hardware support, but it should
run
>>>code warrior and compile PARIS code just fine. I got my hands on a copy
>>>of code warrior and was all set to give it a run, but the copy I got
will
>>>compile for OS 9, but only runs in OS 10. I was saddened.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Hey mike! What emulator are you using? Is it stable? Are you able
to
>>>run
>>>>the mac version of Paris on your Athlon?
>>>>
>>>>"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi Gantt,
>>>>>
>>>>>I actually got a copy of OS 9 to run in an emulator on my PC. As soon
>>>as
>>>>>I get the development Mac from Chuck, I'll clone the development environment
>>>>>there and compile until they're all done.
>>>>>
>>>>>It's kind of cool watching OS 9 boot up on my X2 Athlon.
>>>>>
>>>>>I'll let you know the minute I have more news.
>>>>>
>>>>>Mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hey Mike,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Did you ever get a Mac to work with?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Gantt
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I just thought I'd post an update so that you don't think I've forgotten
>>>>>>>about you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The crazy snow has been good for PARIS development. I've coded a
back
>>>>>and
>>>>>>>and a ui for the class a amp from the dp4+/dp-pro. Unfortunately,
>there
>>>>>>>must be differences in the way memory is handled between the two platforms,
>>>>>>>because it disables most other plugins as soon as it loads (and it
>doesn't
>>>>>>>work, either).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I had to sort out how PARIS references tables compared to the DP/Pro,
>>>>which
>>>>>>>I figured out last night. I thought that would fix the plug, but
it
>>>didn't.
>>>>>>> There must be something else.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Anyway, I'm working on it. I'm sure that what I learn from this effort
>>>>>>will
>>>>>>>make the rest of the dp/pro ports that much easier.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hope you're all doing well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>you know which Kim who you are.........;o)
>
>
Done. Responded. And stuff. Thanks mate. :o)All the more reason to vote for Ron Paul !! haha, er.. sorry - he does have
the sweetest t-shirts though!
-Carl
"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote in message news:47d6ff64$1@linux...
> Well....if the Clintons would just do the right thing and slit their
> wrists, they wouldn't be the brunt of so many jokes and we could all feel
> sorry for them instead.......me.......I'd weep for at least few
> milliseconds. I'd probably measure it though so I could somehow compensate
> for the latency so I didn't really waste even a few milliseconds of my
> life feeling sorry for the Clintons.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mr. Sunshine ;o)
>
>
> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:47d6f2a9@linux...
>>
>> Short memory, eh? :^)
>>
>> Did you forget about Bill Clinton? Leno is _still_ making hay out of his
>> sex scandal. Doesn't matter what party you're in, if you "screw up" in
>> office, jokes will fly.
>>
>> Politicians make late night TV too easy sometimes. ;^)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Jamie
>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Mr. Simplicity wrote:
>>> It will be interesting to see if the governor of New York gets equal
>>> time. Here are the late night barbs that were thrown at the Republican
>>> who got busted doing the same thing- note the charming political spins:
>>>
>>> "Louisiana Senator David Vitter held a press conference this week, where
>>> he admitted yes, he was a client of the DC madam, but he said those
>>> stories of hookers dressing him in diapers were not true. Boy, what do
>>> you do there? Are you supposed to take the word of a politician over a
>>> hooker? It's a tough decision for people." --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "Vitter's wife was by his side when he made the announcement. She called
>>> the senator her 'best friend.' Unfortunately, his best friend is someone
>>> named Thumper." --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "At his press conference yesterday, where he admitted being involved
>>> with prostitutes, Louisiana Senator David Vitter apologized to his
>>> longtime supporters -- the working men and the working girls of
>>> Louisiana." --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "Last night, down in Washington, DC, they had the all-night Senate
>>> session. The senators were there all night. It was the DC madam's
>>> slowest night ever." --David Letterman
>>>
>>> "The darling of the religious right, conservative Senator David Vitter
>>> of Louisiana, not only admitted to having sex with prostitutes, he would
>>> pay them $300 to make him wear diapers. And today that crazy astronaut
>>> called him 'my dream guy, he's got my vote!" --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "Vitter put out a statement saying he only started cheating on his wife
>>> after he started hanging out with the wrong crowd, you know, Giuliani,
>>> Newt Gingrich, the mayor of LA." --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "David Vitter has admitted he dates hookers in Washington, D.C., and
>>> also in Louisiana. He said in his defense he always selected the girl
>>> who made the lowest bid, so he's fiscally prudent." --David Letterman
>>>
>>> "There's another one of those prostitution scandals down there in
>>> Washington, DC. Louisiana Senator David Vitter admitted that he's been
>>> visiting Washington area prostitutes. And I thought about this, 'Whoa,
>>> wait a minute, a politician, paying for a hooker? I didn't see that
>>> comin.'" --David Letterman
>>>
>>> "But good for Vitter, he said that it did not cost the taxpayers a cent.
>>> He pays for the hookers with his bribe money." --David Letterman
>>>
>>> "Well now more problems with this Vitter guy. You gotta go on his
>>> website, he's like Mr. Religious, Mr. Family Values. Well now a
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94266 is a reply to message #94261] |
Wed, 02 January 2008 11:09 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
other plugins as soon as it loads (and it
>>doesn't
>>>>>>>>work, either).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I had to sort out how PARIS references tables compared to the DP/Pro,
>>>>>which
>>>>>>>>I figured out last night. I thought that would fix the plug, but
>it
>>>>didn't.
>>>>>>>> There must be something else.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Anyway, I'm working on it. I'm sure that what I learn from this
effort
>>>>>>>will
>>>>>>>>make the rest of the dp/pro ports that much easier.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hope you're all doing well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Mike
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote in message news:47d64b4b$1@linux...
> Yeah, love that guy. He hits his drums really hard. :) And Bob's in
> fine voice there.
>
> S
Yeah,
Ol' Bob hit some pretty good high ones didn't he? This was around 1980, long
after the ZepIII album. I'm with you though, Bob lost some of his upper
range zing after Zep II.
;o)Unless you call on ALL sex-scandal-tinged politicians to commit suicide,
you're simply putting forth your own double standard. A twisted one at that.
Sunshine is good, though. :^)
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
Mr. Simplicity wrote:
> Well....if the Clintons would just do the right thing and slit their wrists,
> they wouldn't be the brunt of so many jokes and we could all feel sorry for
> them instead.......me.......I'd weep for at least few milliseconds. I'd
> probably measure it though so I could somehow compensate for the latency so
> I didn't really waste even a few milliseconds of my life feeling sorry for
> the Clintons.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mr. Sunshine ;o)
>
>
> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:47d6f2a9@linux...
>> Short memory, eh? :^)
>>
>> Did you forget about Bill Clinton? Leno is _still_ making hay out of his
>> sex scandal. Doesn't matter what party you're in, if you "screw up" in
>> office, jokes will fly.
>>
>> Politicians make late night TV too easy sometimes. ;^)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Jamie
>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Mr. Simplicity wrote:
>>> It will be interesting to see if the governor of New York gets equal
>>> time. Here are the late night barbs that were thrown at the Republican
>>> who got busted doing the same thing- note the charming political spins:
>>>
>>> "Louisiana Senator David Vitter held a press conference this week, where
>>> he admitted yes, he was a client of the DC madam, but he said those
>>> stories of hookers dressing him in diapers were not true. Boy, what do
>>> you do there? Are you supposed to take the word of a politician over a
>>> hooker? It's a tough decision for people." --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "Vitter's wife was by his side when he made the announcement. She called
>>> the senator her 'best friend.' Unfortunately, his best friend is someone
>>> named Thumper." --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "At his press conference yesterday, where he admitted being involved with
>>> prostitutes, Louisiana Senator David Vitter apologized to his longtime
>>> supporters -- the working men and the working girls of Louisiana." --Jay
>>> Leno
>>>
>>> "Last night, down in Washington, DC, they had the all-night Senate
>>> session. The senators were there all night. It was the DC madam's slowest
>>> night ever." --David Letterman
>>>
>>> "The darling of the religious right, conservative Senator David Vitter of
>>> Louisiana, not only admitted to having sex with prostitutes, he would pay
>>> them $300 to make him wear diapers. And today that crazy astronaut called
>>> him 'my dream guy, he's got my vote!" --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "Vitter put out a statement saying he only started cheating on his wife
>>> after he started hanging out with the wrong crowd, you know, Giuliani,
>>> Newt Gingrich, the mayor of LA." --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "David Vitter has admitted he dates hookers in Washington, D.C., and also
>>> in Louisiana. He said in his defense he always selected the girl who made
>>> the lowest bid, so he's fiscally prudent." --David Letterman
>>>
>>> "There's another one of those prostitution scandals down there in
>>> Washington, DC. Louisiana Senator David Vitter admitted that he's been
>>> visiting Washington area prostitutes. And I thought about this, 'Whoa,
>>> wait a minute, a politician, paying for a hooker? I didn't see that
>>> comin.'" --David Letterman
>>>
>>> "But good for Vitter, he said that it did not cost the taxpayers a cent.
>>> He pays for the hookers with his bribe money." --David Letterman
>>>
>>> "Well now more problems with this Vitter guy. You gotta go on his
>>> website, he's like Mr. Religious, Mr. Family Values. Well now a second
>>> madam has come forward and told the Associated Press that he was also a
>>> customer at her brothel. This guy was cheating on his hooker with another
>>> hooker." --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "And this madam says that Vitter was not only having sex with the
>>> prostitutes -- this is unbelievable -- he would also pay them to dress
>>> him up in a diaper. See, that's what you call a pampered politician. And
>>> she also said today in an interview that he sometimes paid $300 an hour
>>> just to have the hookers talk to him because his wife didn't listen to
>>> him. Well, I bet she's all ears now." --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "Republican Senator and family values conservative -- that's what he
>>> calls himself -- Senator David Vitter of Louisiana admitted he was a
>>> client of the so called DC Madam in Washington. See, this is so wrong. At
>>> least use a hooker from your own state. I mean they're gonna pump money
>>> into the economy, make it your own." --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "Family values conservative Republican Senator from Louisiana David
>>> Vitter admitted he has had sex with prostitutes. Apparently years ago
>>> this Senator Vitter guy had been seeing one of the DC Madam's escorts.
>>> You think the Senator's embarrassed? How about the hooker? Now the whole
>>> world knows she had sex with a politician, eww." --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "But he says he's not going to talk about it out of respect for his wife,
>>> that's what he said today. It's all these guys getting caught with
>>> hookers, they have this newfound respect for their wife. Ya know
>>> something, when his pants were down around his ankles leaving the motel,
>>> I don't see him going 'you know, I love my wife.' Well you know what
>>> makes it especially hypocritical: apparently Vitter has been a strong
>>> opponent of same-sex marriage, but today he explained that too.
>>> Apparently he's against having sex with the person you're married
>>> to." --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "They have prostitutes in Washington D.C., and it now turns out that
>>> senators and congressmen and important, powerful people are dating the
>>> prostitutes. ... And there's a senator from Louisiana, David Vitter,
>>> admitted he's been dating prostitutes. And he was very generous with one
>>> girl, he paid her with a new highway project in her home state. ... One
>>> thing I'll say for this guy from Louisiana, this David Vitter, at least
>>> he went to a professional and left the congressional pages
>>> alone." --David Letterman
>>>
>>> "Right now, Washington, DC, is in the grips and throws of a big
>>> prostitution ring sex scandal. High-pow
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94267 is a reply to message #94264] |
Wed, 02 January 2008 12:38 |
|
|
ered politicians going to visit
>>> prostitutes. The call girl agency had a slogan. The slogan was 'We take
>>> care of you below the beltway'" --David Letterman
>>>
>>> "The Washington, D.C., madam has threatened to release more names of
>>> Washington politicians who were her customers. ... She says another
>>> member of the White House will be named very soon. This proves once again
>>> that members of the Bush administration don't know when it's time to pull
>>> out." --Jay Leno
>>>
>>> "Politicians having sex with prostitutes? What's the matter? All of a
>>> sudden, congressional pages aren't good enough anymore?" --David
>>> Letterman
>>>
>>> "There's a big scandal going on down in Washington, DC, with a
>>> prostitution ring. ... Politicians were actually paying for sex. One girl
>>> got paid with a military base in her home state." --David Letterman.
>>> Will Client #9 get equal time?
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00AB_01C88396.B554B660
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:47d70cac@linux...
>=20
> Unless you call on ALL sex-scandal-tinged politicians to commit =
suicide,=20
> you're simply putting forth your own double standard. A twisted one at =
that.
>=20
> Sunshine is good, though. :^)
>=20
> Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
>=20
Well, in an effort to salvage some sort of good from this, I guess the =
question should be asked:
If I bet a hooker $100 she can't make me have an orgasm, is that =
prostitution or gambling?
------=_NextPart_000_00AB_01C88396.B554B660
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16608" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>"Jamie K" <</FONT><A=20
href=3D"mailto:Meta@Dimensional.com"><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>Meta@Dimensional.com</FONT></A><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>> =
wrote in=20
message </FONT><A href=3D"news:47d70cac@linux"><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>news:47d70cac@linux</FONT></A><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>> <BR>> Unless you call on ALL=20
sex-scandal-tinged politicians to commit suicide, <BR>> you're simply =
putting=20
forth your own double standard. A twisted one at that.<BR>> <BR>> =
Sunshine=20
is good, though. :^)<BR>> <BR>> Cheers,<BR>> =
-Jamie<BR>> =20
</FONT><A href=3D"http://www.JamieKrutz.com"><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>www.JamieKrutz.com</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>> <BR>Well,=20
in an effort to salvage some sort of good from this, I guess the =
question should=20
be asked:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT-STYLE: italic"><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> If I =
bet a hooker=20
$100 she can't make me have an orgasm, is that prostitution or=20
gambling?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT-STYLE: italic"><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT-STYLE: italic"><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_00AB_01C88396.B554B660--you gyus are a bnuch of skic mohtrefukcesr
;)o
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uakdt3hd1hmrs9vqigm90cbsvuhobj26i1@4ax.com...
> you amen"eheh"...sey
>
> On 11 Mar 2008 22:20:43 +1000, "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>that's what I'm talking about ! hehe
>"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>
>
>Well, in an effort to salvage some sort of good from this, I guess the =
>question should be asked:
>
> If I bet a hooker $100 she can't make me have an orgasm, is that =
>prostitution or gambling?
>
I thought if it was a sure thing it wasn't gambling.
You guys have way too much time on your hands!
steve
hey, for a complete change of mental state, listen to Lou's new CD!This is truly amazing!
http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna
Direct Note Access is a technology that makes the impossible possible: for
the first time in audio recording history you can identify and edit individual
notes within polyphonic audio material. The unique access that Melodyne affords
to pitch, timing, note lengths and other parameters of melodic notes will
now also be afforded to individual notes within chords.This is unbelievably cool on one level and sorta'
..........errrrrr.........I'm not really sure....scary maybe???.....on
another level. It is however, very amazing and I will have to have it or I
will die. I believe this will be a part of the every mix engineer's toolkit,
since the impossible is now possible, and we will be required to fix entire
clambeds......at no extra charge of course. Is overdubbing now dead?
"Steve Helm" <shelm@radford.edu> wrote in message news:47d7319a$1@linux...
>
> This is truly amazing!
>
> http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna
>
> Direct Note Access is a technology that makes the impossible possible: for
> the first time in audio recording history you can identify and edit
> individual
> notes within polyphonic audio material. The unique access that Melodyne
> affords
> to pitch, timing, note lengths and other parameters of melodic notes will
> now also be afforded to individual notes within chords.For me, the biggest question....will it work on group sing harmonies (where
everyone was recorded at the same time) this is one of the biggest things
I have noticed around here, singers just aren't used to nailing group vocals
anymore.
Come to think of it...I really don't want to be able to fix that sort of
stuff. Just do it right. It IS something I've noticed in the last few years
though.
Rod
"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>This is unbelievably cool on one level and sorta'
>.........errrrrr.........I'm not really sure....scary maybe???.....on
>another level. It is however, very amazing and I will have to have it or
I
>will die. I believe this will be a part of the every mix engineer's toolkit,
>since the impossible is now possible, and we will be required to fix entire
>clambeds......at no extra charge of course. Is overdubbing now dead?
>
>"Steve Helm" <shelm@radford.edu> wrote in message news:47d7319a$1@linux...
>>
>> This is truly amazing!
>>
>> http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna
>>
>> Direct Note Access is a technology that makes the impossible possible:
for
>> the first time in audio recording history you can identify and edit
>> individual
>> notes within polyphonic audio material. The unique access that Melodyne
>> affords
>> to pitch, timing, note lengths and other parameters of melodic notes will
>> now also be afforded to individual notes within chords.
>
>I think it will eventually to break entire mixes into spectral/timbral blobs
and we will be able to use it as a mastering tool.
The world, as we know it is coming to an end. I was gonna start intensifying
my practicing on guitar but now I don't even need to.
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:47d7449b$1@linux...
>
> For me, the biggest question....will it work on group sing harmonies
> (where
> everyone was recorded at the same time) this is one of the biggest things
> I have noticed around here, singers just aren't used to nailing group
> vocals
> anymore.
> Come to think of it...I really don't want to be able to fix that sort of
> stuff. Just do it right. It IS something I've noticed in the last few
> years
> though.
> Rod
> "Mr. Simplicity" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94269 is a reply to message #94267] |
Wed, 02 January 2008 14:33 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
zing!
>>>
>>> http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna
>>>
>>> Direct Note Access is a technology that makes the impossible possible:
> for
>>> the first time in audio recording history you can identify and edit
>>> individual
>>> notes within polyphonic audio material. The unique access that Melodyne
>
>>> affords
>>> to pitch, timing, note lengths and other parameters of melodic notes
>>> will
>>> now also be afforded to individual notes within chords.
>>
>>
>Just like with the very first version of Auto-Tune, the genie
is now out of the bottle... may as well plan to buy this new
thing at some point, becasue if it CAN be done, clients will
EXPECT it to be done.
I notice this sort of attitude all the way down to the simplest
things, such as:
1.) A project I did a couple years ago, wherein I instructed
the drummer to get new heads before we started tracking... he
didn't - he said "they sound fine" (IMO, they didn't - they
were "useable" sounds, but they could've been a helluva lot
better), as I was pointing this out during mixdown, he said
"yeah, but you can fix that, right?"
2.) Another project I did awhile after that one where I told
the guitar player & bass player to change strings the night
before we started tracking - the guitar player did, the bass
player didn't... ended up having to re-amp & process the hell
out of his bass track in order to overcome the deadness of the
strings.
3.) On the project I just started, when getting kick tones,
we nailed a great one on the first try at mic placement
(which I kinda have a good method for, but still, it's nice to
nail it right away, regardless!), and the drummer was very
pleased on playback of the test track, but nonetheless he
happened to mention: "yeah, but still, all you really need is
an impact of some kind, right?", indicating his belief that
anything can be done once you have that.... which is not too
far off, really.
It USED to be that a musician would complain if they didn't hear
"their sound" coming through the monitors - now it's as if they
don't care what it sounds like coming through the monitors, they
expect you to be able to make it that way after the fact.
Likewise, I've recorded singers that were VERY particular about
how their tracks sounded and WANTED to re-do a line because
their pitch was off (not usually the case with me at the board,
because I'd have them re-do it while they were still on the
other side of the glass if it was clear they missed it) or they
didn't like a certain phrasing or dynamic, now it's pretty
much: "You can fix that, right?" lol
Yes I can... and soon i'll be doing every part on your entire
album for you, too - you just go mix yourself a drink or grab a
beer; the bar's over there in the corner.
lol
Neil
"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:>I think it will eventually to break
entire mixes into spectral/timbral blobs
>and we will be able to use it as a mastering tool.
>
>The world, as we know it is coming to an end. I was gonna start intensifying
>my practicing on guitar but now I don't even need to.
>
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:47d7449b$1@linux...
>>
>> For me, the biggest question....will it work on group sing harmonies
>> (where
>> everyone was recorded at the same time) this is one of the biggest things
>> I have noticed around here, singers just aren't used to nailing group
>> vocals
>> anymore.
>> Come to think of it...I really don't want to be able to fix that sort
of
>> stuff. Just do it right. It IS something I've noticed in the last few
>> years
>> though.
>> Rod
>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>This is unbelievably cool on one level and sorta'
>>>.........errrrrr.........I'm not really sure....scary maybe???.....on
>>>another level. It is however, very amazing and I will have to have it
or
>> I
>>>will die. I believe this will be a part of the every mix engineer's
>>>toolkit,
>>
>>>since the impossible is now possible, and we will be required to fix
>>>entire
>>
>>>clambeds......at no extra charge of course. Is overdubbing now dead?
>>>
>>>"Steve Helm" <shelm@radford.edu> wrote in message news:47d7319a$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> This is truly amazing!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna
>>>>
>>>> Direct Note Access is a technology that makes the impossible possible:
>> for
>>>> the first time in audio recording history you can identify and edit
>>>> individual
>>>> notes within polyphonic audio material. The unique access that Melodyne
>>
>>>> affords
>>>> to pitch, timing, note lengths and other parameters of melodic notes
>>>> will
>>>> now also be afforded to individual notes within chords.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>Wow. That's pretty cool. Remixing just took on a new meaning....
"yeah, you want the Vladimir Horowitz performance of a Mozart Piano Sonata
in C major converted to Hungarian minor? no prob..."
On 3/11/08 7:53 PM, in article 47d73aa9@linux, "Mr. Simplicity"
<noway@jose.net> wrote:
> This is unbelievably cool on one level and sorta'
> .........errrrrr.........I'm not really sure....scary maybe???.....on
> another level. It is however, very amazing and I will have to have it or I
> will die. I believe this will be a part of the every mix engineer's toolkit,
> since the impossible is now possible, and we will be required to fix entire
> clambeds......at no extra charge of course. Is overdubbing now dead?
>
> "Steve Helm" <shelm@radford.edu> wrote in message news:47d7319a$1@linux...
>>
>> This is truly amazing!
>>
>> http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna
>>
>> Direct Note Access is a technology that makes the impossible possible: for
>> the first time in audio recording history you can identify and edit
>> individual
>> notes within polyphonic audio material. The unique access that Melodyne
>> affords
>> to pitch, timing, note lengths and other parameters of melodic notes will
>> now also be afforded to individual notes within chords.
>
>Bonzo wasn't really the "basher" that most people think of him
as... yeah he had a big drum sound, but i think that was partly
due to the 26" kick, and the way he tuned his snare (which was a
metal one - which makes a difference, as well); he really had
a lot of subtle finesse that he doesn't get much credit for.
Look closely at that video clip you posted - he's not hammering
with as much velocity as you might think!
Hardest-hitting drummer that I EVER saw was someone you wouldn't
even think would play that way - at least based on his style -
and that was Neil Peart of Rush... check it:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5IhELGjybR8
Check out the overhead shot at 1:26, and then the cutaway/side-
shot at 1:29... his sticks are moving like THREE TIMES the
distance of Bonham's in the video clip you posted for Kashmir!
And that's not even as hard as he used to hit 'em, either.
Neil (who's favorite Zep song is "Achilles' Last Stand" - see
link below of an amateur video montage assembled over the
studio cut of this song... a great Bonham track!)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=-ArWLI908i4
"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>
>"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote in message news:47d64b4b$1@linux...
>> Yeah, love that guy. He hits his drums really hard. :) And Bob's in
>> fine voice there.
>>
>> S
>
>
>Yeah,
>
>Ol' Bob hit some pretty good high ones didn't he? This was around 1980,
long
>after the ZepIII album. I'm with you though, Bob lost some of his upper
>range zing after Zep II.
>
>;o)
>
>Studio technology, and along with it the attitude people have, is getting
silly. Neil and Deej, you're both on the money IMO.
The question I guess is which art form you want to master. You can be a muso...
a person who can play live. You can be a producer... a person who creates
recorded works, often with little requirement to actually play anything.
You can be a sucker who gets paid to be an engineer but is expected to take
people who don't sound any good while playing an instrument and make it sound
like they sounded good by, in fact, being an underpaid producer.
I assume that these bands who don't really sound like "their own" recordings
aren't all that passionate about the music. Probably moreso about the groupies
and other "benefits". ;o) Now I get the attraction to groupies and stuff,
but at the risk of sounding old, why the world tolerates this whole fake
stardom thing I really don't get. Milly Vinilly got crucified for not singing
on their recordings, but it's seeming today almost like it would have been
ok so long as they sung SOMETHING, ANYTHING, and then a computer used whatever,
even if it was another vocal, to twist the piece of audio which they entered
in the computer into something releasable.
I've got nothing against the technology. I mean in itself it doesn't hurt
anything. The idea of being able to sit at a computer and have complete control,
in the end, of every harmonic, every note, every hit, and be able to manipulate
each and all of the above easily and quickly will, I'm sure, create astounding
art, and there's no reason to be without that.
What is troubling, and in a way it's been happening for a while, is that
people have forgotten the actual proper roots of music. Even the real "down
to earth" music lovers who go and see local ba
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94270 is a reply to message #94267] |
Wed, 02 January 2008 13:41 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
nds, in most cases, go and
see loud amplified acts in a room, for the most part, full of strangers.
Now there's nothing wrong with that either, but I do think a lot of people
miss out on the real basics. The pleasure of a good muso on a "real" acoustic
instrument just sitting and playing to a small group of friends in a room.
Hit song distribution once occurred mostly when Mozart or a good "cover"
pianist was playing in town. Meanwhile some local guy knew how to strum a
few tunes on the guitar.
I don't think there's anything wrong with any way of being creative. There
is, however, something wrong when the public thinks one artist is responsible,
when in fact they sound amazingly different if left to their own devices.
I also think we're missing out on a lot by not fully appreciating real, live,
acoustic, organic music anywhere near often enough.
It feels to me somewhat like we invented sex toys and then somehow forgot
what it's like to just be with another person. ;o)
We think we're expanding our horizons, but it seems that the ground behind
is retreating as quickly as the ground in front advances. Every time we step
further into computer land we forget a little more of what we left behind,
and hence the horizon remains the size it was, only less organic.
I think I'll stop talking now. ;o)
Cheers,
Kim.
"Neil" <OIUOI@OUI.com> wrote:
>
>Just like with the very first version of Auto-Tune, the genie
>is now out of the bottle... may as well plan to buy this new
>thing at some point, becasue if it CAN be done, clients will
>EXPECT it to be done.
>
>I notice this sort of attitude all the way down to the simplest
>things, such as:
>
>1.) A project I did a couple years ago, wherein I instructed
>the drummer to get new heads before we started tracking... he
>didn't - he said "they sound fine" (IMO, they didn't - they
>were "useable" sounds, but they could've been a helluva lot
>better), as I was pointing this out during mixdown, he said
>"yeah, but you can fix that, right?"
>
>2.) Another project I did awhile after that one where I told
>the guitar player & bass player to change strings the night
>before we started tracking - the guitar player did, the bass
>player didn't... ended up having to re-amp & process the hell
>out of his bass track in order to overcome the deadness of the
>strings.
>
>3.) On the project I just started, when getting kick tones,
>we nailed a great one on the first try at mic placement
>(which I kinda have a good method for, but still, it's nice to
>nail it right away, regardless!), and the drummer was very
>pleased on playback of the test track, but nonetheless he
>happened to mention: "yeah, but still, all you really need is
>an impact of some kind, right?", indicating his belief that
>anything can be done once you have that.... which is not too
>far off, really.
>
>It USED to be that a musician would complain if they didn't hear
>"their sound" coming through the monitors - now it's as if they
>don't care what it sounds like coming through the monitors, they
>expect you to be able to make it that way after the fact.
>Likewise, I've recorded singers that were VERY particular about
>how their tracks sounded and WANTED to re-do a line because
>their pitch was off (not usually the case with me at the board,
>because I'd have them re-do it while they were still on the
>other side of the glass if it was clear they missed it) or they
>didn't like a certain phrasing or dynamic, now it's pretty
>much: "You can fix that, right?" lol
>
>Yes I can... and soon i'll be doing every part on your entire
>album for you, too - you just go mix yourself a drink or grab a
>beer; the bar's over there in the corner.
>
>lol
>
>Neil
>
>
>
>"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:>I think it will eventually to break
>entire mixes into spectral/timbral blobs
>>and we will be able to use it as a mastering tool.
>>
>>The world, as we know it is coming to an end. I was gonna start intensifying
>
>>my practicing on guitar but now I don't even need to.
>>
>>
>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>>news:47d7449b$1@linux...
>>>
>>> For me, the biggest question....will it work on group sing harmonies
>>> (where
>>> everyone was recorded at the same time) this is one of the biggest things
>>> I have noticed around here, singers just aren't used to nailing group
>
>>> vocals
>>> anymore.
>>> Come to think of it...I really don't want to be able to fix that sort
>of
>>> stuff. Just do it right. It IS something I've noticed in the last few
>
>>> years
>>> though.
>>> Rod
>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>This is unbelievably cool on one level and sorta'
>>>>.........errrrrr.........I'm not really sure....scary maybe???.....on
>>>>another level. It is however, very amazing and I will have to have it
>or
>>> I
>>>>will die. I believe this will be a part of the every mix engineer's
>>>>toolkit,
>>>
>>>>since the impossible is now possible, and we will be required to fix
>>>>entire
>>>
>>>>clambeds......at no extra charge of course. Is overdubbing now dead?
>>>>
>>>>"Steve Helm" <shelm@radford.edu> wrote in message news:47d7319a$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> This is truly amazing!
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna
>>>>>
>>>>> Direct Note Access is a technology that makes the impossible possible:
>>> for
>>>>> the first time in audio recording history you can identify and edit
>>>>> individual
>>>>> notes within polyphonic audio material. The unique access that Melodyne
>>>
>>>>> affords
>>>>> to pitch, timing, note lengths and other parameters of melodic notes
>
>>>>> will
>>>>> now also be afforded to individual notes within chords.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>Young Bonham, Moby Dick
http://www2.teenmusic.com/video/view/id/7866/Led-Zeppelin-Mo by-Dick-Live-Video.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRuTcnd8YLU
More Zep
http://www2.teenmusic.com/video/search/keywords/Led+Zeppelin /type/all/
"Neil" <OIUOI@OUI.com> wrote:
>
>Bonzo wasn't really the "basher" that most people think of him
>as... yeah he had a big drum sound, but i think that was partly
>due to the 26" kick, and the way he tuned his snare (which was a
>metal one - which makes a difference, as well); he really had
>a lot of subtle finesse that he doesn't get much credit for.
>Look closely at that video clip you posted - he's not hammering
>with as much velocity as you might think!
>
>Hardest-hitting drummer that I EVER saw was someone you wouldn't
>even think would play that way - at least based on his style -
>and that was Neil Peart of Rush... check it:
>
>http://youtube.com/watch?v=5IhELGjybR8
>
>Check out the overhead shot at 1:26, and then the cutaway/side-
>shot at 1:29... his sticks are moving like THREE TIMES the
>distance of Bonham's in the video clip you posted for Kashmir!
>And that's not even as hard as he used to hit 'em, either.
>
>
>Neil (who's favorite Zep song is "Achilles' Last Stand" - see
>link below of an amateur video montage assembled over the
>studio cut of this song... a great Bonham track!)
>http://youtube.com/watch?v=-ArWLI908i4
>
>
>
>"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>
>>"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote in message news:47d64b4b$1@linux...
>>> Yeah, love that guy. He hits his drums really hard. :) And Bob's in
>
>>> fine voice there.
>>>
>>> S
>>
>>
>>Yeah,
>>
>>Ol' Bob hit some pretty good high ones didn't he? This was around 1980,
>long
>>after the ZepIII album. I'm with you though, Bob lost some of his upper
>
>>range zing after Zep II.
>>
>>;o)
>>
>>
>OK, that's gettin' a bit creepy. Yes, it's amazing, and I can't even begin
to comprehend how someone figured out how to do this.
And maybe if I had clients, especially clients with limited talents, funds,
or patience, I might have use for this. And I can even see how it could be
handy as a composing tool.
But I don't have clients, and if I want to hear what my chording will sound
like in a different mode or whatever, I'll just play/sing it that way.
There only a couple ways I'm willing to "cheat": Editing the best parts of
multiple takes together, and punching in. When someone tells me they really
like my music and that I'm really talented, I don't ever want to be
thinking,"Well, yeah, but I can't really do that."
And besides, there are so many really talented composers and players in the
world who will never be fortunate enough to be widely recognized for it.
This is why I object to using technology to make up for deficits in real
talent and skill.
I'm with Hot Rod . . . just do the friggin' thing right. Or find someone
who can.
Sarah
curmudgeon, throwback, & registered nurse
PS: buy our CD . . . it's 99% midi-free. No trans fats.
http://cdbaby.com/cd/sarahtonin
"Steve Helm" <shelm@radford.edu> wrote in message news:47d7319a$1@linux...
>
> This is truly amazing!
>
> http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna
>
> Direct Note Access is a technology that makes the impossible possible: for
> the first time in audio recording history you can identify and edit
> individual
> notes within polyphonic audio material. The unique access that Melodyne
> affords
> to pitch, timing, note lengths and other parameters of melodic notes will
> now also be afforded to individual notes within chords.uhu...huh...ton em.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:43:07 -0600, "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net>
wrote:
>you gyus are a bnuch of skic mohtrefukcesr
>
>;)o
>
>"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94275 is a reply to message #94269] |
Wed, 02 January 2008 15:56 |
|
|
performance for hours and
hours.
I think the technology of Melodyne is cool for what it is, and could be a
creative tool for creating new sounds that can't be played, but it could
also be a massive time-waster. Getting the right performance should be done
by the performer, not the engineer.
Regards,
Dedric
On 3/12/08 1:48 AM, in article 47d78dc1$1@linux, "Sarah"
<sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
> And besides, there are so many really talented composers and players in the
> world who will never be fortunate enough to be widely recognized for it.
> This is why I object to using technology to make up for deficits in real
> talent and skill.
>
> I'm with Hot Rod . . . just do the friggin' thing right. Or find someone
> who can.
>
> Sarah
> curmudgeon, throwback, & registered nurse
>
> PS: buy our CD . . . it's 99% midi-free. No trans fats.
> http://cdbaby.com/cd/sarahtonin
>
>
>
> "Steve Helm" <shelm@radford.edu> wrote in message news:47d7319a$1@linux...
>>
>> This is truly amazing!
>>
>> http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna
>>
>> Direct Note Access is a technology that makes the impossible possible: for
>> the first time in audio recording history you can identify and edit
>> individual
>> notes within polyphonic audio material. The unique access that Melodyne
>> affords
>> to pitch, timing, note lengths and other parameters of melodic notes will
>> now also be afforded to individual notes within chords.
>
>I've always wondered what the guys who come up with this kinda stuff look
like....
Just as I expected! : )Ah yes, but just think of all the billable hours it would add to a
project to mess with all that crap!
One more reason to work on an hourly basis... "sure, I can fix it, but
it's gonna cost ya" ;-)
David.
Neil wrote:
> Just like with the very first version of Auto-Tune, the genie
> is now out of the bottle... may as well plan to buy this new
> thing at some point, becasue if it CAN be done, clients will
> EXPECT it to be done.
>
> I notice this sort of attitude all the way down to the simplest
> things, such as:
>
> 1.) A project I did a couple years ago, wherein I instructed
> the drummer to get new heads before we started tracking... he
> didn't - he said "they sound fine" (IMO, they didn't - they
> were "useable" sounds, but they could've been a helluva lot
> better), as I was pointing this out during mixdown, he said
> "yeah, but you can fix that, right?"
>
> 2.) Another project I did awhile after that one where I told
> the guitar player & bass player to change strings the night
> before we started tracking - the guitar player did, the bass
> player didn't... ended up having to re-amp & process the hell
> out of his bass track in order to overcome the deadness of the
> strings.
>
> 3.) On the project I just started, when getting kick tones,
> we nailed a great one on the first try at mic placement
> (which I kinda have a good method for, but still, it's nice to
> nail it right away, regardless!), and the drummer was very
> pleased on playback of the test track, but nonetheless he
> happened to mention: "yeah, but still, all you really need is
> an impact of some kind, right?", indicating his belief that
> anything can be done once you have that.... which is not too
> far off, really.
>
> It USED to be that a musician would complain if they didn't hear
> "their sound" coming through the monitors - now it's as if they
> don't care what it sounds like coming through the monitors, they
> expect you to be able to make it that way after the fact.
> Likewise, I've recorded singers that were VERY particular about
> how their tracks sounded and WANTED to re-do a line because
> their pitch was off (not usually the case with me at the board,
> because I'd have them re-do it while they were still on the
> other side of the glass if it was clear they missed it) or they
> didn't like a certain phrasing or dynamic, now it's pretty
> much: "You can fix that, right?" lol
>
> Yes I can... and soon i'll be doing every part on your entire
> album for you, too - you just go mix yourself a drink or grab a
> beer; the bar's over there in the corner.
>
> lol
>
> Neil
>
>
>
> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:>I think it will eventually to break
> entire mixes into spectral/timbral blobs
>
>>and we will be able to use it as a mastering tool.
>>
>>The world, as we know it is coming to an end. I was gonna start intensifying
>
>
>>my practicing on guitar but now I don't even need to.
>>
>>
>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>>news:47d7449b$1@linux...
>>
>>>For me, the biggest question....will it work on group sing harmonies
>>>(where
>>>everyone was recorded at the same time) this is one of the biggest things
>>>I have noticed around here, singers just aren't used to nailing group
>
>
>>>vocals
>>>anymore.
>>>Come to think of it...I really don't want to be able to fix that sort
>
> of
>
>>>stuff. Just do it right. It IS something I've noticed in the last few
>
>
>>>years
>>>though.
>>>Rod
>>>"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>This is unbelievably cool on one level and sorta'
>>>>.........errrrrr.........I'm not really sure....scary maybe???.....on
>>>>another level. It is however, very amazing and I will have to have it
>
> or
>
>>>I
>>>
>>>>will die. I believe this will be a part of the every mix engineer's
>>>>toolkit,
>>>
>>>>since the impossible is now possible, and we will be required to fix
>>>>entire
>>>
>>>>clambeds......at no extra charge of course. Is overdubbing now dead?
>>>>
>>>>"Steve Helm" <shelm@radford.edu> wrote in message news:47d7319a$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>>>This is truly amazing!
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna
>>>>>
>>>>>Direct Note Access is a technology that makes the impossible possible:
>>>
>>>for
>>>
>>>>>the first time in audio recording history you can identify and edit
>>>>>individual
>>>>>notes within polyphonic audio material. The unique access that Melodyne
>>>
>>>>>affords
>>>>>to pitch, timing, note lengths and other parameters of melodic notes
>
>
>>>>>will
>>>>>now also be afforded to individual notes within chords.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>I can imagine the sessions:
"Hal, we need you to strum a chord"
"Just one chord?"
"Just one chord, Hal, that's right."
"Uh, what chord?"
"Doesn't matter."
"Like this?"
"Great, thanks."
"OK, here I go..."
"No, we're done, Hal. You can leave now."
"Uh, really? OK, see you next time."
"We won't be needing you any more Hal, we have the chord to work with."
"wha...?"
"Hal, please clear the studio, we have the bass note to record, the horn
section stab, and then we need the rest of the week to work with your
chord."
"But I blocked out four hours..."
"Sorry Hal, we're only paying you for thirty seconds. But listen, if you
play that same chord on the piano on your way out we'll double your pay
and give you a soda. Which is like tripling your pay!"
"Yo man, you're a real jerk!"
"Nice, we can use the 'yo.' Thanks Hal."
"Mother#*&@ ass*&#(#^!"
"Thank you. goodbye Hal."
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
EK Sound wrote:
> Ah yes, but just think of all the billable hours it would add to a
> project to mess with all that crap!
>
> One more reason to work on an hourly basis... "sure, I can fix it, but
> it's gonna cost ya" ;-)
>
> David.
>
> Neil wrote:
>> Just like with the very first version of Auto-Tune, the genie
>> is now out of the bottle... may as well plan to buy this new thing at
>> some point, becasue if it CAN be done, clients will
>> EXPECT it to be done.
>>
>> I notice this sort of attitude all the way down to the simplest
>> things, such as:
>>
>> 1.) A project I did a couple years ago, wherein I instructed the
>> drummer to get new heads before we started tracking... he didn't - he
>> said "they sound fine" (IMO, they didn't - they were "useable" sounds,
>> but they could've been a helluva lot
>> better), as I was pointing this out during mixdown, he said
>> "yeah, but you can fix that, right?"
>>
>> 2.) Another project I did awhile after that one where I told
>> the guitar player & bass player to change strings the night before we
>> started tracking - the guitar player did, the bass
>> player didn't... ended up having to re-amp & process the hell out of
>> his bass track in order to overcome the deadness of the
>> strings.
>>
>> 3.) On the project I just started, when getting kick tones,
>> we nailed a great one on the first try at mic placement
>> (which I kinda have a good method for, but still, it's nice to nail it
>> right away, regardless!), and the drummer was very pleased on playback
>> of the test track, but nonetheless he happened to mention: "yeah, but
>> still, all you really need is an impact of some kind, right?",
>> indicating his belief that anything can be done once you have that....
>> which is not too far off, really.
>>
>> It USED to be that a musician would complain if they didn't hear
>> "their sound" coming through the monitors - now it's as if they
>> don't care what it sounds like coming through the monitors, they
>> expect you to be able to make it that way after the fact. Likewise,
>> I've recorded singers that were VERY particular about
>> how their tracks sounded and WANTED to re-do a line because their
>> pitch was off (not usually the case with me at the board, because I'd
>> have them re-do it while they were still on the other side of the
>> glass if it was clear they missed it) or they didn't like a certain
>> phrasing or dynamic, now it's pretty much: "You can fix that,
>> right?" lol
>>
>> Yes I can... and soon i'll be doing every part on your entire
>> album for you, too - you just go mix yourself a drink or grab
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94277 is a reply to message #94270] |
Wed, 02 January 2008 16:23 |
|
|
s a mastering tool.
>>>
>>> The world, as we know it is coming to an end. I was gonna start
>>> intensifying
>>
>>
>>> my practicing on guitar but now I don't even need to.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> news:47d7449b$1@linux...
>>>
>>>> For me, the biggest question....will it work on group sing harmonies
>>>> (where
>>>> everyone was recorded at the same time) this is one of the biggest
>>>> things
>>>> I have noticed around here, singers just aren't used to nailing group
>>
>>
>>>> vocals
>>>> anymore.
>>>> Come to think of it...I really don't want to be able to fix that sort
>>
>> of
>>
>>>> stuff. Just do it right. It IS something I've noticed in the last few
>>
>>
>>>> years
>>>> though.
>>>> Rod
>>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is unbelievably cool on one level and sorta'
>>>>> .........errrrrr.........I'm not really sure....scary maybe???.....on
>>>>> another level. It is however, very amazing and I will have to have it
>>
>> or
>>
>>>> I
>>>>
>>>>> will die. I believe this will be a part of the every mix engineer's
>>>>> toolkit,
>>>>
>>>>> since the impossible is now possible, and we will be required to
>>>>> fix entire
>>>>
>>>>> clambeds......at no extra charge of course. Is overdubbing now dead?
>>>>>
>>>>> "Steve Helm" <shelm@radford.edu> wrote in message
>>>>> news:47d7319a$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is truly amazing!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Direct Note Access is a technology that makes the impossible
>>>>>> possible:
>>>>
>>>> for
>>>>
>>>>>> the first time in audio recording history you can identify and edit
>>>>>> individual
>>>>>> notes within polyphonic audio material. The unique access that
>>>>>> Melodyne
>>>>
>>>>>> affords
>>>>>> to pitch, timing, note lengths and other parameters of melodic notes
>>
>>
>>>>>> will
>>>>>> now also be afforded to individual notes within chords.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>Read this if you have a few minutes...
http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0811,374064,374064,1.html/f ull
DC"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>You can be a sucker who gets paid to be an engineer but is
>expected to take people who don't sound any good while playing
>an instrument and make it sound like they sounded good by, in
>fact, being an underpaid producer.
You & I certainly have differing opinions on this aspect. I
don't think what you're describing is being a "sucker" at all...
it's simply a skill-set that you have the option to use, and to whatever
extent you wish to employ it, based on the terms under
which you've agreed to work on a given project. For example,
what's the difference between - let's say Mutt Lange, getting
involved with Def Leppard when he did, and taking them to a
level that they probably never would have reached otherwise -
and someone with a certain skill-set taking a not-so-great
local band to some higher level than they could otherwise
achieve without that individual's help? Or a pretty decent
local band, for that matter... or a really good local band - I
don't think it makes any difference, really. Yeah, we're
talking a major difference in terms of the level of the
industry between a Lange/Leppard project & one like I'm
referring to, but inasfar as helping a client/band to realize
their vision... what's the difference?
You always have the option of turning down a project if you
think all you're gonna be doing by working with someone is gold-
plating a turd... unless you do it for a living & you feel you
HAVE to take every piece of business you can get, but good
lord, it's STILL better than before we had all this kind of
technology... "back in the day" you'd STILL have to work with
wankers from time to time, you just couldn't help them as much
as you can now - I'm betting there's almost no one who was a
recordist prior to this era who doesn't have at least a few
projects under their belt that they would rather not admit to
having worked on.
>why the world tolerates this whole fake stardom thing I really
>don't get. Milly Vinilly got crucified for not singing
>on their recordings, but it's seeming today almost like it
>would have been ok so long as they sung SOMETHING, ANYTHING,
>and then a computer used whatever, even if it was another
>vocal, to twist the piece of audio which they entered
>in the computer into something releasable.
Well, it's all about the saleability of the product, not the
quality of the product... which is not to say that there aren't
people who care about the quality of the work they do, it's
just that EVERY form of entertainment seems to have a shorter
shelf life these days, not just music... movies, even good ones,
hit theaters & then a few weeks later they're on DVD; a couple
months after that they're on Pay-per-view, then HBO, etc, etc.
It's rare for a movie, even a very successful one, to stay in
theaters for anywhere near as long as they used to. Look at
video games... used to be in THAT industry you'd be able to
put out a good title & ride it for awhile - now you've got a lot
of games that come out with a new edition every year.
So, you've got to look at the music biz as more of an "assembly
line" process now... assemble it, package it, push it out the
door... NEXT! Right? Which in a way is kinda the same way it
was in the era that some consider to be the "Golden Age" of
popular music... the Brill Building was chock-full of witers
churning out songs, lower-level musicians demoing them,
publishers buying 'em, then selling them to the big-name artists
or their labels. Labels like Motown & entire cities like
Nashville used top-notch session players who could nail stuff
in a take or two, instead of using a feature artist's regular
band, in order to save time/money/get a better track overall.
How much more "assembly line"-like can you get? It wasn't until
albums like "Sgt. Pepper's" and "Pet Sounds" that bands would
start getting really self-indulgent & spend inordinate amounts
of time in the studio experimenting, tweaking... hell, WRITING
in the studio! And for a brief, shining moment there - in that
era when bands like Fleetwood Mac would famously spend a year
in the studio working on an ablum - labels would actually let
them. And I think people of the generation that most of us on
this board seem to be in, came to think that that's the way it's
normally done... we got spoiled, in a way.
But then again - a lot of those artists would have four or five
songs in heavy rotation on the radio at once! If you listened
to rock or Top-40 radio in that era, artists like Steve Miller,
Fleetwood Mac, Boston, Bad Company, Aerosmith, Foghat for a
little bit there... damn the list could go on & on - all had
SEVERAL hits in rotation at the same time! Martin's Air Supply
stuff too, on the pop channels... how many freakin hits did
those guys have on the air at once? Four or five, IIRC.
Doobies, Queen, Manilow, Linda Ronstadt - just a few more that
pop into mind that each had multiple songs on the air at once.
You just don't see that happening all that much anymore.
Argh - that really digressed... ok, enough typing for now lol
NeilYeah, but all those billable hours add up to a stiff neck, a case of carpal
tunnel syndrome and a hole in your spiritual stomach...
Gantt
EK Sound <ask_me@nospam.net> wrote:
>Ah yes, but just think of all the billable hours it would add to a
>project to mess with all that crap!
>
>One more reason to work on an hourly basis... "sure, I can fix it, but
>it's gonna cost ya" ;-)
>
>David.
>
>Neil wrote:
>> Just like with the very first version of Auto-Tune, the genie
>> is now out of the bottle... may as well plan to buy this new
>> thing at some point, becasue if it CAN be done, clients will
>> EXPECT it to be done.
>>
>> I notice this sort of attitude all the way down to the simplest
>> things, such as:
>>
>> 1.) A project I did a couple years ago, wherein I instructed
>> the drummer to get new heads before we started tracking... he
>> didn't - he said "they sound fine" (IMO, they didn't - they
>> were "useable" sounds, but they could've been a helluva lot
>> better), as I was pointing this out during mixdown, he said
>> "yeah, but you can fix that, right?"
>>
>> 2.) Another project I did awhile after that one where I told
>> the guitar player & bass player to change strings the night
>> before we started tracking - the guitar player did, the bass
>> player didn't... ended up having to re-amp & process the hell
>> out of his bass track in order to overcome the deadness of the
>> strings.
>>
>> 3.) On the project I just started, when getting kick tones,
>> we nailed a great one on the first try at mic placement
>> (which I kinda have a good method for, but still, it's nice to
>> nail it right away, regardless!), and the drummer was very
>> pleased on playback of the test track, but nonetheless he
>> happened to mention: "yeah, but still, all you really need is
>> an impact of some kind, right?", indicating his belief that
>> anything can be done once you have that.... which is not too
>> far off, really.
>>
>> It USED to be that a musician would complain if they didn't hear
>> "their sound" coming through the monitors - now it's as if they
>> don't care what it sounds like coming through the monitors, they
>> expect you to be able to make it that way after the fact.
>> Likewise, I've recorded singers that were VERY particular about
>> how their tracks sounded and WANTED to re-do a line because
>> their pitch was off (not usually the case with me at the board,
>> because I'd have them re-do it while they were still on the
>> other side of the glass if it was clear they missed it) or they
>> didn't like a certain phrasing or dynamic, now it's pretty
>> much: "You can fix that, right?" lol
>>
>> Yes I can... and soon i'll be doing every part on your entire
>> album for you, too - you just go mix yourself a drink or grab a
>> beer; the bar's over there in the corner.
>>
>> lol
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
>>
>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:>I think it will eventually to
break
>> entire mixes into spectral/timbral blobs
>>
>>>and we will be able to use it as a mastering tool.
>>>
>>>The world, as we know it is coming to an end. I was gonna start intensifying
>>
>>
>>>my practicing on guitar but now I don't even need to.
>>>
>>>
>>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>news:47d7449b$1@linux...
>>>
>>>>For me, the biggest question....will it work on group sing harmonies
>>>>(where
>>>>everyone was recorded at the same time) this is one of the biggest things
>>>>I have noticed around here, singers just aren't used to nailing group
>>
>>
>>>>vocals
>>>>anymore.
>>>>Come to think of it...I really don't want to be able to fix that sort
>>
>> of
>>
>>>>stuff. Just do it right. It IS something I've noticed in the last few
>>
>>
>>>>years
>>>>though.
>>>>Rod
>>>>"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>This is unbelievably cool on one level and sorta'
>>>>>.........errrrrr.........I'm not really sure....scary maybe???.....on
>>>>>another level. It is however, very amazing and I will have to have it
>>
>> or
>>
>>>>I
>>>>
>>>>>will die. I believe this will be a part of the every mix engineer's
>>>>>toolkit,
>>>>
>>>>>since the impossible is now possible, and we will be required to fix
>>>>>entire
>>>>
>>>>>clambeds......at no extra charge of course. Is
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94279 is a reply to message #94262] |
Wed, 02 January 2008 16:29 |
|
|
d edit
>>>>>>individual
>>>>>>notes within polyphonic audio material. The unique access that Melodyne
>>>>
>>>>>>affords
>>>>>>to pitch, timing, note lengths and other parameters of melodic notes
>>
>>
>>>>>>will
>>>>>>now also be afforded to individual notes within chords.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>a hole in your spiritual stomach...
You're in the music biz, you don't have one of those already?
LOL!
NeilROFL! that's great... especially the "yo" part.
Neil
Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>
>I can imagine the sessions:
>
>"Hal, we need you to strum a chord"
>
>"Just one chord?"
>
>"Just one chord, Hal, that's right."
>
>"Uh, what chord?"
>
>"Doesn't matter."
>
>"Like this?"
>
>"Great, thanks."
>
>"OK, here I go..."
>
>"No, we're done, Hal. You can leave now."
>
>"Uh, really? OK, see you next time."
>
>"We won't be needing you any more Hal, we have the chord to work with."
>
>"wha...?"
>
>"Hal, please clear the studio, we have the bass note to record, the horn
>section stab, and then we need the rest of the week to work with your
>chord."
>
>"But I blocked out four hours..."
>
>"Sorry Hal, we're only paying you for thirty seconds. But listen, if you
>play that same chord on the piano on your way out we'll double your pay
>and give you a soda. Which is like tripling your pay!"
>
>"Yo man, you're a real jerk!"
>
>"Nice, we can use the 'yo.' Thanks Hal."
>
>"Mother#*&@ ass*&#(#^!"
>
>"Thank you. goodbye Hal."
>
>Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>
>EK Sound wrote:
>> Ah yes, but just think of all the billable hours it would add to a
>> project to mess with all that crap!
>>
>> One more reason to work on an hourly basis... "sure, I can fix it, but
>> it's gonna cost ya" ;-)
>>
>> David.
>>
>> Neil wrote:
>>> Just like with the very first version of Auto-Tune, the genie
>>> is now out of the bottle... may as well plan to buy this new thing at
>>> some point, becasue if it CAN be done, clients will
>>> EXPECT it to be done.
>>>
>>> I notice this sort of attitude all the way down to the simplest
>>> things, such as:
>>>
>>> 1.) A project I did a couple years ago, wherein I instructed the
>>> drummer to get new heads before we started tracking... he didn't - he
>>> said "they sound fine" (IMO, they didn't - they were "useable" sounds,
>>> but they could've been a helluva lot
>>> better), as I was pointing this out during mixdown, he said
>>> "yeah, but you can fix that, right?"
>>>
>>> 2.) Another project I did awhile after that one where I told
>>> the guitar player & bass player to change strings the night before we
>>> started tracking - the guitar player did, the bass
>>> player didn't... ended up having to re-amp & process the hell out of
>>> his bass track in order to overcome the deadness of the
>>> strings.
>>>
>>> 3.) On the project I just started, when getting kick tones,
>>> we nailed a great one on the first try at mic placement
>>> (which I kinda have a good method for, but still, it's nice to nail it
>>> right away, regardless!), and the drummer was very pleased on playback
>>> of the test track, but nonetheless he happened to mention: "yeah, but
>>> still, all you really need is an impact of some kind, right?",
>>> indicating his belief that anything can be done once you have that....
>>> which is not too far off, really.
>>>
>>> It USED to be that a musician would complain if they didn't hear
>>> "their sound" coming through the monitors - now it's as if they
>>> don't care what it sounds like coming through the monitors, they
>>> expect you to be able to make it that way after the fact. Likewise,
>>> I've recorded singers that were VERY particular about
>>> how their tracks sounded and WANTED to re-do a line because their
>>> pitch was off (not usually the case with me at the board, because I'd
>>> have them re-do it while they were still on the other side of the
>>> glass if it was clear they missed it) or they didn't like a certain
>>> phrasing or dynamic, now it's pretty much: "You can fix that,
>>> right?" lol
>>>
>>> Yes I can... and soon i'll be doing every part on your entire
>>> album for you, too - you just go mix yourself a drink or grab a beer;
>>> the bar's over there in the corner.
>>>
>>> lol
>>>
>>> Neil
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:>I think it will eventually to
>>> break
>>> entire mixes into spectral/timbral blobs
>>>> and we will be able to use it as a mastering tool.
>>>>
>>>> The world, as we know it is coming to an end. I was gonna start
>>>> intensifying
>>>
>>>
>>>> my practicing on guitar but now I don't even need to.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:47d7449b$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>>> For me, the biggest question....will it work on group sing harmonies
>>>>> (where
>>>>> everyone was recorded at the same time) this is one of the biggest
>>>>> things
>>>>> I have noticed around here, singers just aren't used to nailing group
>>>
>>>
>>>>> vocals
>>>>> anymore.
>>>>> Come to think of it...I really don't want to be able to fix that sort
>>>
>>> of
>>>
>>>>> stuff. Just do it right. It IS something I've noticed in the last few
>>>
>>>
>>>>> years
>>>>> though.
>>>>> Rod
>>>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is unbelievably cool on one level and sorta'
>>>>>> .........errrrrr.........I'm not really sure....scary maybe???.....on
>>>>>> another level. It is however, very amazing and I will have to have
it
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>>>> I
>>>>>
>>>>>> will die. I b
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94293 is a reply to message #94275] |
Wed, 02 January 2008 20:39 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
MNEPP0hh4kxeiaHiep5MoeJ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---=_linux47d860f0--I doubt that is $25.
"LaMOnt" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:47d81f9e$1@linux...
>
> Well, here is yet another attempt to bring DAW users a hybrid product,
> that
> has a nice foot-print..
> Thoughts???
> http://vintageking.com/SSL-Matrix-Console
>
>I had to put a new HD in and of course re-install everything. How do I install
Drumagog into Paris?
SteveThis is why I'm very thankful to be outside music as a living now. A steady
paycheck and health insurance with a retirement plan is GOOD thing in my
view, and one I wondered for years if I'd have. For sure touring and playing
offers no such long term benefits, and living on the road gets expensive.
Taxes on contract musicians can be devestating. Today's shelf life on bands
is so short that one can lose the game easily. I know there's not much
'cool' in the day gig, but it sure beats bein' cool and
hungry/broke/divorced/homeless/addicted, as so many of my peers and friends
have become.
Besides, working at a music store would only append debts for me :)
Gannt, take something you have learned along the way and apply it to another
field. Look through hotjobs.com and the such, look at the descriptions and
see what fits or is close to a fit. You are smart and capable, moreso than
you're giving yourself credit for here.
AA
"EK Sound" <ask_me@nospam.net> wrote in message news:47d819c7$1@linux...
> Most of the people I know around here in similar situations are all
> working at music stores...
>
> David.
>
> Gantt Kushner wrote:
>> That's why I've actually been looking for a day job. Problem is - I'm
>> not
>> qualified to do anything but record and play music!
>>
>> Gantt
>>
>> EK Sound <ask_me@nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>>I get to work on *mostly* turd polishing. In fact, it has been several
>>
>>
>>>years since I actually had FUN on a session... AND I turn away a LOT of
>>
>>
>>>"undesireable sessions"... pretty sad. Most of the good stuff is being
>>
>>
>>>done at the musicians home studios, we never get to see it.
>>>
>>>David.
>>>It's $25k. Lamont was just abbreviating. ;-)
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
news:47d8682e@linux...
>I doubt that is $25.
>
>
> "LaMOnt" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:47d81f9e$1@linux...
>>
>> Well, here is yet another attempt to bring DAW users a hybrid product,
>> that
>> has a nice foot-print..
>> Thoughts???
>> http://vintageking.com/SSL-Matrix-Console
>>
>>
>
>Hi Aaron,
God bless you for having so much more faith in me than I have in myself!
I actually checked out a job at Chuck Levin's Washington Music Center, our
big local store (if you don't count The Guitar Center as local, which I don't!).
The pro sound manager spent a long time telling me about the good and bad
points of the job. Mostly, it sounded like the internet and has totally
changed the business for store's like WMC. The top salesmen are probably
making $50K - $60K after 7 or 8 years on the job. Doesn't sound like much
fun to me. I know that 20 years in the studio business has probably helped
me build some skills that translate in other fields. I've been doing a lot
of thinking about where to look for possibilities.
Gantt
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>This is why I'm very thankful to be outside music as a living now. A steady
>paycheck and health insurance with a retirement plan is GOOD thing in my
>view, and one I wondered for
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94303 is a reply to message #94293] |
Thu, 03 January 2008 00:45 |
Deej
Messages: 130
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
iness with their Windoz
boxes (or linux in deference to Thad), setting up office, connnecting
them to the internet and secruing it is well within your grasp...just a
new vocabulary to learn.
Long winded, but just another one saying "GO for it".
Jeff
Kushner wrote:
> I have a friend (also a musician) who's a CISCO network engineer. He's been
> encouraging me to look into it. MAybe I'll do some research...
>
> Gantt
>
> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>
>>2 things for sure. Computers and government jobs aren't going anywhere.
>
> If I
>
>>could step backwards about 5 years, I'd have gone into high end networking
>
> I
>
>>think, and become a network architect for someone like CISCO or NORTEL -
>
>
>>they get stupid money. And it is artistic - you design and see the future
>
> of
>
>>the business client and stroke the brush on how they'll expand and use it.
>
>
>>The art is today's design with the future in mind.
>>
>>Some insights: *everything* is going to be about networks in the future
>
>
>>where business is concerned. Video Security, visual entertainment,
>>audio/audio control, data, phones, fire alarms, smoke detectors, remote
>
>
>>users.... it's all network capable these days.With the advances in storage,
>
>
>>CPU power and 10GBit network speeds here today, it will only get bigger
>
> and
>
>>the cool thing is that the fiber in the ground is still good as speeds push
>
>
>>upwards for some time. IMO that means switches/fiber equipment is gonna
>
> be
>
>>the demand, and labor on how to design it/impliment it.
>>
>>OS and computer type are a fading memory, it's all gonna be about (wired
>
> and
>
>>wireless) internet/intranet. Believe me on this. Take that CLWMC or GC gig
>
>
>>if you need to but study at night. If it's about networking, learn the 7
>
> OSI
>
>>layers, understand the IP / Subnet mask relationship, learn the ins and
>
> outs
>
>>for secured network structure especially in the wireless field.
>>
>>http://www.braindumps.com/
>>
>>http://www.brainbench.com/
>>
>>http://www.proprofs.com/
>>
>>AA
>>
>>
>>"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>news:47d8762e$1@linux...
>>
>>>Hi Aaron,
>>>
>>>God bless you for having so much more faith in me than I have in myself!
>>>I actually checked out a job at Chuck Levin's Washington Music Center,
>
> our
>
>>>big local store (if you don't count The Guitar Center as local, which
>
> I
>
>>>don't!).
>>>The pro sound manager spent a long time telling me about the good and
>
> bad
>
>>>points of the job. Mostly, it sounded like the internet and has totally
>>>changed the business for store's like WMC. The top salesmen are probably
>>>making $50K - $60K after 7 or 8 years on the job. Doesn't sound like
>
> much
>
>>>fun to me. I know that 20 years in the studio business has probably
>>>helped
>>>me build some skills that translate in other fields. I've been doing
>
> a
>
>>>lot
>>>of thinking about where to look for possibilities.
>>>
>>>Gantt
>>>
>>>"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>
>>>>This is why I'm very thankful to be outside music as a living now. A
>>>>steady
>>>
>>>>paycheck and health insurance with a retirement plan is GOOD thing in
>
> my
>
>>>>view, and one I wondered for years if I'd have. For sure touring and
>>>>playing
>>>
>>>>offers no such long term benefits, and living on the road gets expensive.
>>>
>>>>Taxes on contract musicians can be devestating. Today's shelf life on
>
>
>>>>bands
>>>
>>>>is so short that one can lose the game easily. I know there's not much
>>>
>>>>'cool' in the day gig, but it sure beats bein' cool and
>>>>hungry/broke/divorced/homeless/addicted, as so many of my peers and
>>>>friends
>>>
>>>>have become.
>>>>Besides, working at a music store would only append debts for me :)
>>>>Gannt, take something you have learned along the way and apply it to
>>>>another
>>>
>>>>field. Look through hotjobs.com and the such, look at the descriptions
>
> and
>
>>>>see what fits or is close to a fit. You are smart and capable, moreso
>
> than
>
>>>>you're giving yourself credit for here.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>AA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"EK Sound" <ask_me@nospam.net> wrote in message news:47d819c7$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>>>Most of the people I know around here in similar situations are all
>>>>>working at music stores...
>>>>>
>>>>>David.
>>>>>
>>>>>Gantt Kushner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>That's why I've actually been looking for a day job. Problem is -
>
> I'm
>
>>>>>>not
>>>>>>qualified to do anything but record and play music!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Gantt
>>>>>>
>>>>>>EK Sound <ask_me@nospam.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I get to work on *mostly* turd polishing. In fact, it has been several
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>years since I actually had FUN on a session... AND I turn away a LOT
>>>
>>>of
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"undesireable sessions"... pretty sad. Most of the good stuff is being
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>done at the musicians home studios, we never get to see it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>David.
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>25K and no mic pres or EQs? WTF?
LaMOnt wrote:
> Well, here is yet another attempt to bring DAW users a hybrid product, that
> has a nice foot-print..
> Thoughts???
> http://vintageking.com/SSL-Matrix-Console
>
>A) That stuff was funny!
B) Trying to make this about elephants versus donkeys is just lame,
IMHO. These guys are assholes, of whatever stripe (I mean the guys who
paid for sex, not ALL politicians). ;-)
Mr. Simplicity wrote:
> It will be interesting to see if the governor of New York gets equal
> time. Here are the late night barbs that were thrown at the Republican
> who got busted doing the same thing- note the charming political spins:
>
> "Louisiana Senator David Vitter held a press conference this week, where
> he admitted yes, he was a client of the DC madam, but he said those
> stories of hookers dressing him in diapers were not true. Boy, what do
> you do there? Are you supposed to take the word of a politician over a
> hooker? It's a tough decision for people." --Jay Leno
>
> "Vitter's wife was by his side when he made the announcement. She called
> the senator her 'best friend.' Unfortunately, his best friend is someone
> named Thumper." --Jay Leno
>
> "At his press conference yesterday, where he admitted being involved
> with prostitutes, Louisiana Senator David Vitter apologized to his
> longtime supporters -- the working men and the working girls of
> Louisiana." --Jay Leno
>
> "Last night, down in Washington, DC, they had the all-night Senate
> session. The senators were there all night. It was the DC madam's
> slowest night ever." --David Letterman
>
> "The darling of the religious right, conservative Senator David Vitter
> of Louisiana, not only admitted to having sex with prostitutes, he would
> pay them $300 to make him wear diapers. And today that crazy astronaut
> called him 'my dream guy, he's got my vote!" --Jay Leno
>
> "Vitter put out a statement saying he only started cheating on his wife
> after he started hanging out with the wrong crowd, you know, Giuliani,
> Newt Gingrich, the mayor of LA." --Jay Leno
>
> "David Vitter has admitted he dates hookers in Washington, D.C., and
> also in Louisiana. He said in his defense he always selected the girl
> who made the lowest bid, so he's fiscally prudent." --David Letterman
>
> "There's another one of those prostitution scandals down there in
> Washington, DC. Louisiana Senator David Vitter admitted that he's been
> visiting Washington area prostitutes. And I thought about this, 'Whoa,
> wait a minute, a politician, paying for a hooker? I didn't see that
> comin.'" --David Letterman
>
> "But good for Vitter, he said that it did not cost the taxpayers a cent.
> He pays for the hookers with his bribe money." --David Letterman
>
> "Well now more problems with this Vitter guy. You gotta go on his
> website, he's like Mr. Religious, Mr. Family Values. Well now a second
> madam has come forward and told the Associated Press that he was also a
> customer at her brothel. This guy was cheating on his hooker with
> another hooker." --Jay Leno
>
> "And this madam says that Vitter was not only having sex with the
> prostitutes -- this is unbelievable -- he would also pay them to dress
> him up in a diaper. See, that's what you call a pampered politician. And
> she also said today in an interview that he sometimes paid $300 an hour
> just to have the hookers talk to him because his wife didn't listen to
> him. Well, I bet she's all ears now." --Jay Leno
>
> "Republican Senator and family values conservative -- that's what he
> calls himself -- Senator David Vitter of Louisiana admitted he was a
> client of the so called DC Madam in Washington. See, this is so wrong.
> At least use a hooker from your own state. I mean they're gonna pump
> money into the economy, make it your own." --Jay Leno
>
> "Family values conservative Republican Senator from Louisiana David
> Vitter admitted he has had sex with prostitutes. Apparently years ago
> this Senator Vitter guy had been seeing one of the DC Madam's escorts.
> You think the Senator's embarrassed? How about the hooker? Now the whole
> world knows she had sex with a politician, eww." --Jay Leno
>
> "But he says he's not going to talk about it out of respect for his
> wife, that's what he said today. It's all these guys getting caught with
> hookers, they have this newfound respect for their wife. Ya know
> something, when his pants were down around his ankles leaving the motel,
> I don't see him going 'you know, I love my wife.' Well you know what
> makes it especially hypocritical: apparently Vitter has been a strong
> opponent of same-sex marriage, but today he explained that too.
> Apparently he's against having sex with the person you're married to."
> --Jay Leno
>
> "They have prostitutes in Washington D.C., and it now turns out that
> senators and congressmen and important, powerful people are dating the
> prostitutes. ... And there's a senator from Louisiana, David Vitter,
> admitted he's been dating prostitutes. And he was very generous with one
> girl, he paid her with a new highway project in her home state. ... One
> thing I'll say for this guy from Louisiana, this David Vitter, at least
> he went to a professional and left the congressional pages alone."
> --David Letterman
>
> "Right now, Washington, DC, is in the grips and throws of a big
> prostitution ring sex scandal. High-powered politicians going to visit
> prostitutes. The call girl agency had a slogan. The slogan was 'We take
> care of you below the beltway'" --David Letterman
>
> "The Washington, D.C., madam has threatened to release more names of
> Washington politicians who were her customers. ... She says another
> member of the White House will be named very soon. This proves once
> again that members of the Bush administration don't know when it's time
> to pull out." --Jay Leno
>
> "Politicians having sex with prostitutes? What's the matter? All of a
> sudden, congressional pages aren't good enough anymore?" --David Letterman
>
> "There's a big scandal going on down in Washington, DC, with a
> prostitution ring. ... Politicians were actually paying for sex. One
> girl got paid with a military base in her home state." --David Letterman.
>
>
> Will Client #9 get equal time?I'm still waiting for someone on American Idol, when they do the '70s
covers, to sing Aqualung. I can't believe it hasn't happened yet!
Neil wrote:
> Thanks, guys... and, Bill, the finger's not quite up to speed
> yet - this was tracked well before all that happened.
> HOWEVER, it has healed-up pretty well, and apart from the fact
> that it's pretty numb (the doc says nerve endings take longer
> to heal, and it could be awhile until i get some normal
> sensation back), I can at least use it. It looks little bit
> weird... I mean, you can tell something happened to it & all,
> and the nail isn't quite normal, either, but it's much better
> than the alternative!
>
> Interesting that you should cite a Tull-ish-ness to my music...
> I hardly ever hear that comparison made, but yeah, those guys
> definitely got some spins on my record player back in the day,
> so i'm sure some of their influence leaked in somewhere.
> I'm also glad that it evokes something like that which you
> mentioned; that's really the purpose of my music - to take you
> somewhere else for a little while, like a good book or movie
> does.
>
> Neil
>
>
> Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>> Great mix! Damn nice.
>>
>> The drums sound excellent and, Rod, very nice playing! Great guitar work
>
>> too. I guess the finger is up to speed again.
>>
>> Your music invokes my old Tull inclinations. I got into them on the very
>
>> first album and tour and saw them many times in concert during the '70s.
>
>> The green fields and forests of ye merry olde England come cheerfully to
>
>> mind when I hear your music as well.
>>
>> As an aside, my brother had dinner with Ian Anderson a few years ago in
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94304 is a reply to message #94293] |
Thu, 03 January 2008 02:51 |
|
|
>
>> England. He is friends with my sister in law's family. I would love to
>> meet him some day.
>>
>> Neil wrote:
>>> Once again, another great job by mr. Rod Lincoln on the drums...
>>> and I think I nailed the mix right out of the gate on this one,
>>> too.
>>>
>>> http://saqqararecords.com/MiscAudio/GiftOfTheDesert-mp3.mp3
>>>
>>>
>>> I uploaded this one as a hi-rez mp3 file, so you could hear
>>> every detail, so it's a little bigger (9megs), but it's worth
>>> it, trust me - it's barely discernable from the full 35-meg wav
>>> rendering.
>>>
>>> I really like this mix... listen to it on halfway-decent
>>> monitors or phones & you're gonna feel like you're right in the
>>> middle of it.
>>>
>>> And, of course, Rod does a killer job of interpreting my vision
>>> on this one, as well.
>>>
>>> Neil
>Somewhere somebody compiled a list of latencies for Waves plugins. Most of
them are negligible, I think.
Gantt
"joe sfair" <joesfair@realtor.com> wrote:
>
>how do i prevent latency with waves plugins-what is the full proceedure-thanks-JoeEven more: You have to buy the pres and EQ via a separate rack units.
The bad part to this product to me is that it only uses the MAckie HUI &
MC controllers. That won;t cut it if you're a Steinberg, Logic, Sonar user.
HUI is very weak as a Pro Tools Controller..
I would like to see this kind of product WITH Euphonix deep EUCON control..
As if stand, the Tascam DM-32/48 is the best band for all-around DAW/Mixing
unit..
Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>25K and no mic pres or EQs? WTF?
>
>LaMOnt wrote:
>> Well, here is yet another attempt to bring DAW users a hybrid product,
that
>> has a nice foot-print..
>> Thoughts???
>> http://vintageking.com/SSL-Matrix-Console
>>
>>A grandfather, who got to baby-sit his granddaughter one day ever
week, always made a special effort to find some alone time each time
she visited.
Each week he would take her out for a drive in the car for some
bonding time.
One particular day however, he had a bad cold and he really didn't
feel like being up at all. Luckily, grandma came to the rescue and
said that she would take her out for her weekly ride.
When they returned, the little girl anxiously ran upstairs to see her
grandpa.
'Well,' grandpa asked, 'Did you enjoy your ride with grandma?'
'Oh yes, Poppa' the girl replied, 'and do you know what? We didn't see
a single dumb bastard or lousy shit head!'I think this is my only resource y'all. Teri from Drumagog doesn't have a
clue, and her and Rim are in Germany in a trade show.
Anybody out there that can help me??
SteveI think you can patch in outboard pre's and EQ's. Thing is, you're getting
charged as much as you would for a DM2000 which is a lot more flexible, I
think, and has preamps.
"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:47d924f7@linux...
> 25K and no mic pres or EQs? WTF?
>
> LaMOnt wrote:
>> Well, here is yet another attempt to bring DAW users a hybrid product,
>> that
>> has a nice foot-print..
>> Thoughts???
>> http://vintageking.com/SSL-Matrix-Console
>>As I remember, I think it was a DirectX plugin - of which you would just
install Drumagog, and then it would show up in your native effects list. In
fact, I think that would be the *only* scenario for loading it to Paris. I
never used it with Paris - only with wave editor programs. I'm sure someone
else here in the forum would have more specifics for you.
-Carl
"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote in message news:47d96ef6$1@linux...
>
> I think this is my only resource y'all. Teri from Drumagog doesn't have a
> clue, and her and Rim are in Germany in a trade show.
> Anybody out there that can help me??
> SteveMan..you nailed it.
;o)
"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:47d7f7e4@linux...
>
> I can imagine the sessions:
>
> "Hal, we need you to strum a chord"
>
> "Just one chord?"
>
> "Just one chord, Hal, that's right."
>
> "Uh, what chord?"
>
> "Doesn't matter."
>
> "Like this?"
>
> "Great, thanks."
>
> "OK, here I go..."
>
> "No, we're done, Hal. You can leave now."
>
> "Uh, really? OK, see you next time."
>
> "We won't be needing you any more Hal, we have the chord to work with."
>
> "wha...?"
>
> "Hal, please clear the studio, we have the bass note to record, the horn
> section stab, and then we need the rest of the week to work with your
> chord."
>
> "But I blocked out four hours..."
>
> "Sorry Hal, we're only paying you for thirty seconds. But listen, if you
> play that same chord on the piano on your way out we'll double your pay
> and give you a soda. Which is like tripling your pay!"
>
> "Yo man, you're a real jerk!"
>
> "Nice, we can use the 'yo.' Thanks Hal."
>
> "Mother#*&@ ass*&#(#^!"
>
> "Thank you. goodbye Hal."
>
> Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>
> EK Sound wrote:
>> Ah yes, but just think of all the billable hours it would add to a
>> project to mess with all that crap!
>>
>> One more reason to work on an hourly basis... "sure, I can fix it, but
>> it's gonna cost ya" ;-)
>>
>> David.
>>
>> Neil wrote:
>>> Just like with the very first version of Auto-Tune, the genie
>>> is now out of the bottle... may as well plan to buy this new thing at
>>> some point, becasue if it CAN be done, clients will
>>> EXPECT it to be done.
>>>
>>> I notice this sort of attitude all the way down to the simplest
>>> things, such as:
>>>
>>> 1.) A project I did a couple years ago, wherein I instructed the drummer
>>> to get new heads before we started tracking... he didn't - he said "they
>>> sound fine" (IMO, they didn't - they were "useable" sounds, but they
>>> could've been a helluva lot
>>> better), as I was pointing this out during mixdown, he said
>>> "yeah, but you can fix that, right?"
>>>
>>> 2.) Another project I did awhile after that one where I told
>>> the guitar player & bass player to change strings the night before we
>>> started tracking - the guitar player did, the bass
>>> player didn't... ended up having to re-amp & process the hell out of his
>>> bass track in order to overcome the deadness of the
>>> strings.
>>>
>>> 3.) On the project I just started, when getting kick tones,
>>> we nailed a great one on the first try at mic placement
>>> (which I kinda have a good method for, but still, it's nice to nail it
>>> right away, regardless!), and the drummer was very pleased on playback
>>> of the test track, but nonetheless he happened to mention: "yeah, but
>>> still, all you really need is an impact of some kind, right?",
>>> indicating his belief that anything can be done once you have that....
>>> which is not too far off, really.
>>>
>>> It USED to be that a musician would complain if they didn't hear
>>> "their sound" coming through the monitors - now it's as if they
>>> don't care what it sounds like coming through the monitors, they
>>> expect you to be able to make it that way after the fact. Likewise, I've
>>> recorded singers that were VERY particular about
>>> how their tracks sounded and WANTED to re-do a line because their pitch
>>> was off (not usually the case with me at the board, because I'd have
>>> them re-do it while they were still on the other side of the glass if it
>>> was clear they missed it) or they didn't like a certain phrasing or
>>> dynamic, now it's pretty much: "You can fix that, right?" lol
>>>
>>> Yes I can... and soon i'll be doing every part on your entire
>>> album for you, too - you just go mix yourself a drink or grab a beer;
>>> the bar's over there in the corner.
>>>
>>> lol
>>>
>>> Neil
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:>I think it will eventually to
>>> break
>>> entire mixes into spectral/timbral blobs
>>>> and we will be able to use it as a mastering tool.
>>>>
>>>> The world, as we know it is coming to an end. I was gonna start
>>>> intensifying
>>>
>>>
>>>> my practicing on guitar but now I don't even need to.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:47d7449b$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>>> For me, the biggest question....will it work on group sing harmonies
>>>>> (where
>>>>> everyone was recorded at the same time) this is one of the biggest
>>>>> things
>>>>> I have noticed around here, singers just aren't used to nailing group
>>>
>>>
>>>>> vocals
>>>>> anymore.
>>>>> Come to think of it...I really don't want to be able to fix that sort
>>>
>>> of
>>>
>>>>> stuff. Just do it right. It IS something I've noticed in the last few
>>>
>>>
>>>>> years
>>>>> though.
>>>>> Rod
>>>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is unbelievably cool on one level and sorta'
>>>>>> .........errrrrr.........I'm not really sure....scary maybe???.....on
>>>>>> another level. It is however, very amazing and I will have to have it
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>>>> I
>>>>>
>>>>>> will die. I believe this will be a part of the every mix engineer's
>>>>>> toolkit,
>>>>>
>>>>>> since the impossible is now possible, and we will be required to fix
>>>>>> entire
>>>>>
>>>>>> clambeds......at no extra charge of course. Is overdubbing now dead?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Steve Helm" <shelm@radford.edu> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:47d7319a$1@linux...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is truly amazing!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Direct Note Access is a technology that makes the impossible
>>>>>>> possible:
>>>>>
>>>>> for
>>>>>
>>>>>>> the first time in audio recording history you can identify and edit
>>>>>>> individual
>>>>>>> notes within polyphonic audio material. The unique access that
>>>>>>> Melodyne
>>>>>
>>>>>>> affords
>>>>>>> to pitch, timing, note lengths and other parameters of melodic notes
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> now also be afforded to individual notes within chords.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>I'm trying to remember but I think Carl's right...I don't remember doing
anything special.
"Carl Amburn" <carlamburn@hotNOSPAMmail.com> wrote in message
news:47d9750e$1@linux...
> As I remember, I think it was a DirectX plugin - of which you would just
> install Drumagog, and then it would show up in your native effects list.
> In fact, I think that would be the *only* scenario for loading it to
> Paris. I never used it with Paris - only with wave editor programs. I'm
> sure someone else here in the forum would have more specifics for you.
>
> -Carl
>
>
> "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote in message
> news:47d96ef6$1@linux...
>>
>> I think this is my only resource y'all. Teri from Drumagog doesn't have a
>> clue, and her and Rim are in Germany in a trade show.
>> Anybody out there that can help me??
>> Steve
>
>Hi,
I have psoted before the chart for waves.
I remember that C1 is 0 latent
Eq's are 0 latent.
Rvox, rcomp, rdeeser, etc are 64 samples latent.
That is what I remember.
Do a search to find the list...
Regards,
Dimitrios
"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>Somewhere somebody compiled a list of latencies for Waves plugins. Most
of
>them are negligible, I think.
>
>Gantt
>
>"joe sfair" <joesfair@realtor.com> wrote:
>>
>>how do i prevent latency with waves plugins-what is the full proceedure-thanks-Joe
>"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>I'm trying to remember but I think Carl's right...I don't remember doing
>anything special.
>
>
>"Carl Amburn" <carlamburn@hotNOSPAMmail.com> wrote in message
>news:47d9750e$1@linux...
>> As I remember, I think it was a DirectX plugin - of which you would just
>> install Drumagog, and then it would show up in your native effects list.
>> In fact, I think that would be the *only* scenario for loading it to
>> Paris. I never used it with Paris - on
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94436 is a reply to message #94304] |
Mon, 07 January 2008 07:33 |
Gene Lennon[4]
Messages: 26
Registered: November 2006
|
Junior Member |
|
|
rote:
>>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with the PARIS plugins.
>> 20 People have donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at least 3 more
>>before turning my attention to the driver.
>>
>>I also hope top start releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. With
any
>>luck, that will be within a month.
>>
>>I really hope these have meant something to people. I've had a great time
>>working on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - both having
>>them and making them.
>>
>>The Amp was the hardest one yet. took probably around 75 hours to finish,
>>and it built on countless hours learning about the plugins before. It's
>>still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory into a register
>>done by the logic unit is 4 times as loud (2 bits offset) as compared to
>>the same MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug that took
>>forever to track down.
>>
>>Anyway, it just doesn't feel right spending that kind of time and watching
>>dozens and dozens of copies get downloaded when only 6 people cared enough
>>to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person doesn't own PARIS anymore,
>>and another is waiting for a Mac version. So, of all the people who downloaded
>>and hopefully used the code, only 4 people gave anything for it.
>>
>>Anyway, the download links are gone. You can still pay anything you want
>>- there are no set prices. But, access to the code will require sending
>>"something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably set myself
>>up for this. I can be a bit naive.
>>
>>All the best,
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>
>I saw that one. Man, it is sweet. Thing is, it's the same price as a tricked
out DM2000. which would you rather have?
"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:47dc3a89$1@linux...
>
> Hey DJ, although some what pricey, this new SSL Controller does handle
> HArdware
> integration really nice..Take a look.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nki8IVUSFPY
>
> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>pretty cool.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDZbfGOdufo&feature=relat ed
>>
>>
>I'm sorry.....
;oD
I just really hate the new 2.0. It's absolutely wayyyyy overblown with
unnecessary crap that makes it basically scooterfucked IMO. If I buy EZ
Drummer 2.0 and DFH Superior, will I have a decent sample library with
percussion instruments and will I be glad I did or does it suck too? I just
want something easy to use that sounds good. the only thing I can think of
that suks worse then the new BFD is the old, original DFH.Man, DJ, I keep telling and recomending Addictive Drums. I have th eEZ drum
kits as well, but Addictive is way better(Sounding) and it's layout is very
easy,yet powerful.
BTW: The New Superior 2.0 looks to be in the frame work of Addicive drums.
"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>I just really hate the new 2.0. It's absolutely wayyyyy overblown with
>unnecessary crap that makes it basically scooterfucked IMO. If I buy EZ
>Drummer 2.0 and DFH Superior, will I have a decent sample library with
>percussion instruments and will I be glad I did or does it suck too? I just
>want something easy to use that sounds good. the only thing I can think
of
>that suks worse then the new BFD is the old, original DFH.
>
>
>Tough call.. I work on a DM2000 from time to time, and it's stellar, to say
the least..
I would go for the Dm-2000, due it''s great sounding Pre's(24), he ability
to mix 96 channels@96k, with Eq/ dynamics..8 Spx-1000 units..6 graphic eqs
on the buses..Integration with Steingberg, Pro Tools, Logic and DP..For around
17k o start. Not Bad.
"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>I saw that one. Man, it is sweet. Thing is, it's the same price as a tricked
>out DM2000. which would you rather have?
>
>
>"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:47dc3a89$1@linux...
>>
>> Hey DJ, although some what pricey, this new SSL Controller does handle
>> HArdware
>> integration really nice..Take a look.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nki8IVUSFPY
>>
>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>pretty cool.
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDZbfGOdufo&feature=relat ed
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>I don't know Dedric. There seems to be this trend to adhere to the smaller
foot-print studio from the DAW manufactuers. And this trned is coming from
the EU DAW users. DAW users in the states want 24, 32 fader controllers and
at least 16 channels of i/o.
Also, he trend to add DSP to the hardware i/o units negates the promise
of Native's claim.
Just my Opinion: I don't think Steingberg is close to cracking the Multi-core
puzzle. I think a Total Re-write would be required. But, I think they (Steingberg)
will duck-tape a solution much like Digidesign has with Pro Tools to keep
it going,even tho the market has all this CPU power..
Even More: These day, I don't know where Steingberg strategic direction is
heading. Like,who's on first?
Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>Uh.... dsp based solutions? You mean a firewire interface with EQ, comps
>and a reverb? We've had Totalmix and Cuemix for years. MOTU added the
same
>to their new interface as well - just another marketing feature.
>
>Fader units? Did you forget Presonus (Baton Rouge, LA) and Frontier Design
>(Lebanon, NH) - these are US companies, and they pretty much started the
>1-fader idea. Also, Euphonix - 4 fader MC Control anyone?
>
>There's no US vs. Europe mindset here - just marketing different approaches
>to different users. The new Cubase controller's ad blurb even says its
>designed for people with minimal desk space....
>
>Dedric
>
>On 3/15/08 3:12 PM, in article 47dc2da5$1@linux, "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey DJ,
>> Well my friend, I think you are Right on point with your post.
>> The Naive solution is at a cross-road of sorts. Here we have powerful
multi
>> core cpus, and crippling operating systems..
>>
>> Then, you have the Euro vs USA mind set of working.. The Euro way of DAW
>> workflow is to go small (think yammy N12, the new Steing Stuff, 1 fader
>> conrollers).
>> The US DAW users are into 16,24, 32 fader controllers. Big difference
in
>> working styles.
>>
>> Just my Opinion: It seems that ALL of the DAW manufacturers are moving
towards
>> a DSP based solution..My my ..
>>
>> So, like my post a few months ago about Native vs DSP. You can see that
for
>> those users who need over 16 channels of i/o, it's going to cost.
>>
>> However, for those of you who are not familiar with Yamaha's Pres and
I/o
>> units, all I have to say is WOW!! Their now discontinued I88x & 01x as
well
>> as their digital workhorses DM2000 and 02r96 have some of the best on
board
>> Pres in the buisness. These babys can compete with the best. So, those
who
>> doe get into these new Yammy/Stienberg units have got a real winner on
their
>> hands.
>>
>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
>>> news:47dc19b7$1@linux...
>>>> If I was losing PARIS, assuming this box doesn't sound crappy, this
is
>>
>>>> probably what I'd do since SONAR isn't getting it's hardware/software
>>
>>>> relationship together.
>>>>
>>>> AA
>>>>
>>>>
>>> After thinking about it for about 15 seconds, a few thoughts came o mind
>>
>>> that are specific to my situation but also important, I believe, to the
>>
>>> audio community in general. I think that by the time this is released,
the
>>
>>> question will be whether or not Cubase software has evolved to the point
>> of
>>> really being able to utilize 8 x CPU cores. If so, and CPU's keep evolving
>>
>>> at the rate they have been, there will really be no need for dedicated
DSP
>>
>>> hardware. My RME MADI driver will work quite nicely at low enough latency
>> to
>>> serve nicely with the Cubase control room function if enough CPU horsepower
>>
>>> is available .......which sorta' begs the following questions:
>>>
>>> 1. Does this mean that Steinberg has decided to back burner the software
>>
>>> rewrite that they say is happening for Cubase that will allow it to more
>>
>>> efficiently use multiple cores in order to move users toward buying their
>>
>>> hardware?
>>>
>>> 2. Will this work with Nuendo, or will Steinberg just integrate the code
>>
>>> rewrite in Nuendo, thus selectively crippling Cubase and requiring Cubase
>>
>>> users to crossgrade to Nuendo, plus their ripoff Cubase addon which gives
>> it
>>> the same functionality as Cubase at a considerable expense, in order
to
>> take
>>> advantage of 3rd party controllers and multiple core CPU's?
>>>
>>> 3. Where do they come up with the convenient fantasy that mix engineers
>> only
>>> use a single fader at a time? That engineer would not be me.
>>>
>>> 4. Will future rewrites scuttle the functionality of my Houston controller
>>
>>> (which does a lot of what their controller does already)?
>>>
>>> 5. Why do they assume I'm going to want to pay for 8 x Yamaha preamps
per
>>
>>> interface? This is one reason I don't already own an 02R 96 or
>>> DM1000/2000??........wait......sorry.......this isn't about me. I'm just
>> a
>>> consumer.
>>>
>>> Color me disappointed (but not surprised) that they are moving toward
the
>>
>>> Digidesign model......unless, of course, they are still moving forward
with
>>
>>> the software rewrites that will allow native CPU's and 3rd party
>>> hardware/drivers to eclipse the performance of their own hardware that
they
>>
>>> have just announced.
>>>
>>> The reason I haven't built a system with 8 cores is because it would
be
>>
>>> relatively worthless with Steiny software which is what I have chosen
to
>>
>>> use. Cubase can barely utilize a single socket system with 4 x cores
or
>> a
>>> dual socket system with 2 x dual cores. Steinberg has been saying that
they
>>
>>> are working to correct this. I'm just wondering if the new hardware will
>>
>>> provide them a convenient excuse to market hardware rather than correct
>>
>>> their antiquated software.
>>>
>>> Maybe I'm paranoid. We've seen DAW manufacturers do an about face and
>>> blatantly lie to their user base.......the EMU acquisition of Ensoniq
and
>>
>>> the subsequent killing off of the stepchild Paris system, even as they
>>> rebranded the proprietary hardware and sold it to us at a premium while
>>
>>> assuring this heavily invested user base that they were moving forward
with
>>
>>> development and upgrades is a classic example.
>>>
>>> ;o)
>>>
>>>
>>
>I still haven't heard a Yamaha filter that doesn't hurt my ears.
And it's Rodney Orpheus! Glad he still has a job, I remember him pimping
the Houston as the best thing since bagels got seeds.
I'll stick with the rig I have for now . . .
TCB
"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>pretty cool.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDZbfGOdufo&feature=relat ed
>
>Hey Mike, I have downloaded a single plugin as of yet. I plan to in the near
future, when I move my Paris rig over to our main studio. When, I do, I'll
also give an deserving amount to this cause.. Keep up the great work..
P.S.
I have a DP4 & Pro and would love to have a few of those Hall reverb presets.
"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote:
>
>Hi All,
>
>I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with the PARIS plugins.
> 20 People have donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at least 3 more
>before turning my attention to the driver.
>
>I also hope top start releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. With any
>luck, that will be within a month.
>
>I really hope these have meant something to people. I've had a great time
>working on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - both having
>them and making them.
>
>The Amp was the hardest one yet. took probably around 75 hours to finish,
>and it built on countless hours learning about the plugins before. It's
>still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory into a register
>done by the logic unit is 4 times as loud (2 bits offset) as compared to
>the same MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug that took
>forever to track down.
>
>Anyway, it just doesn't feel right spending that kind of time and watching
>dozens and dozens of copies get downloaded when only 6 people cared enough
>to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person doesn't own PARIS anymore,
>and another is waiting for a Mac version. So, of all the people who downloaded
>and hopefully used the code, only 4 people gave anything for it.
>
>Anyway, the download links are gone. You can still pay anything you want
>- there are no set prices. But, access to the code will require sending
>"something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably set myself
>up for this. I can be a bit naive.
>
>All the best,
>
>Mike
>
>I looked at that when the video hit the net last year, but I can't see
spending $6000 for a mixer to front end $600 software/Sonar. If steiny is
able to ASIO nice latency figures I don't understand why cake can't as well
but there you have it. The other thing being, granted I haven't heard the VM
personally, that I don't particularly like the sound of the Roland pres I
have used in the past. Some of the questions I had then still haven't really
become clear such as
Up to 40 tracks from mixer to sonar. 40 tracks of what resolution?
Can one choose less tracks at higher res? More tracks at a lower?
Just exactly how are they\are they compressing the audio, and what
artifacts? I do NOT like Roland VSxxx recorder compression.
Is computer connection strictly a data dump through a standard NIC, or ??
and how does Sonar see it?
Don't get me wrong, for a live mixer this thing is pretty awesome. I've long
since been a fan for the idea of preamps/audio processing staying on stage
to be controlled remotely, like the VM series Roland had years back. I
absolutely detest latency.
I'm not that sure it's a recordists dream, however.
It's unfortunate and apparant they can't get latency right with WDM/ASIO
drivers after years of it. Which is a mind blower, because they were the
ones working with Microsoft on the WDM spec. What they really probably ought
to do is either expand their 'hardware' line (which is EDIROL already I
believe) to more than the 'power' series of stuff and less than a $6k REAC
mixer. There's a whole lot missing there in the middle, and DSP + more
inputs would fix it.
http://www.cakewalk.com/Products/hardware.asp
Shame, cause I love how sonar functions, but many won't move to it for
semi-pro/pro work because of the latency they can't seem to lick. Steiny
apparantly has beat that now with the Yammy interface.<
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94458 is a reply to message #94436] |
Mon, 07 January 2008 15:21 |
|
|
> wrote:
>I just really hate the new 2.0. It's absolutely wayyyyy overblown with
>unnecessary crap that makes it basically scooterfucked IMO. If I buy EZ
>Drummer 2.0 and DFH Superior, will I have a decent sample library with
>percussion instruments and will I be glad I did or does it suck too? I just
>want something easy to use that sounds good. the only thing I can think
of
>that suks worse then the new BFD is the old, original DFH.
>
>
>hey mike,
while i've sent yo money a couple of times before i'll send some more
in the future. i haven't fired up paris in a few months so trying the
ones i have will have to wait a bit longer.
thanks for all your hard work.
On 16 Mar 2008 07:21:09 +1000, "Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote:
>
>Hi All,
>
>I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with the PARIS plugins.
> 20 People have donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at least 3 more
>before turning my attention to the driver.
>
>I also hope top start releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. With any
>luck, that will be within a month.
>
>I really hope these have meant something to people. I've had a great time
>working on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - both having
>them and making them.
>
>The Amp was the hardest one yet. took probably around 75 hours to finish,
>and it built on countless hours learning about the plugins before. It's
>still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory into a register
>done by the logic unit is 4 times as loud (2 bits offset) as compared to
>the same MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug that took
>forever to track down.
>
>Anyway, it just doesn't feel right spending that kind of time and watching
>dozens and dozens of copies get downloaded when only 6 people cared enough
>to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person doesn't own PARIS anymore,
>and another is waiting for a Mac version. So, of all the people who downloaded
>and hopefully used the code, only 4 people gave anything for it.
>
>Anyway, the download links are gone. You can still pay anything you want
>- there are no set prices. But, access to the code will require sending
>"something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably set myself
>up for this. I can be a bit naive.
>
>All the best,
>
>Mike
>bagel seeds??? where do you get them at??? the spring planting season
is almost here and i'd like to get a jump on the competition.
On 16 Mar 2008 15:52:37 +1000, "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>I still haven't heard a Yamaha filter that doesn't hurt my ears.
>
>And it's Rodney Orpheus! Glad he still has a job, I remember him pimping
>the Houston as the best thing since bagels got seeds.
>
>I'll stick with the rig I have for now . . .
>
>TCB
>
>"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>pretty cool.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDZbfGOdufo&feature=relat ed
>>
>>Go with the Kosher ones:
http://home.tiac.net/~cri/1998/bagel.html
The following was seen attached to a plastic zip lock bag containing
Cheerios.
WHERE TO PLANT BAGEL SEEDS
Any bright sunny location, preferably close to a delicatessen.
WHEN TO PLANT
Year around, but onion bagels grow best in winter, while poppy seed and
pumpernickel grow well in summer.
CARE OF PLANTS
Plant in seven equal rows, running north and south. You may make the
middle row longer. Join all rows with one long east-west row, for
irrigation and to form a menorah. All seeds must be planted at least
four feet deep. Any less depth and the hole in the bagel will not
develop properly. Irrigate sparsely, with boiling water only!!
NOTE: Over-irrigation or cold water will cause your growing bagel to
become soggy. Soggy bagels are not good for anything. . .
While it is possible to grow bagels topped with cream cheese by
sprinkling the blossoms with fresh dairy cream, you should contact a
professional bagel grower for expert advice. Some unkosher growers will
use fertilizer, but that does affect the taste and texture, even if it
does hasten the growth. However, those who like egg bagels have had
success using fresh eggs as fertilizer.
TO EAT
Cut cross-wise. Never, never cut a bagel vertically. Ladle on lox and
cream cheese (you were warned only experts could raise bagels already
topped). Use when ripe. While day-old bagels may be toasted and eaten,
any older and they tend to fossilize and are only good for missiles.
Beware of over-ripe bagels!
GUARANTEE
If you are not 100% satisfied, dig up your bagel seeds and return. A
BRAND NEW package of seeds will be sent to you.
rick wrote:
> bagel seeds??? where do you get them at??? the spring planting season
> is almost here and i'd like to get a jump on the competition.
>
>
>
> On 16 Mar 2008 15:52:37 +1000, "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>> I still haven't heard a Yamaha filter that doesn't hurt my ears.
>>
>> And it's Rodney Orpheus! Glad he still has a job, I remember him pimping
>> the Houston as the best thing since bagels got seeds.
>>
>> I'll stick with the rig I have for now . . .
>>
>> TCB
>>
>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>> pretty cool.
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDZbfGOdufo&feature=relat ed
>>>
>>>
>have you tried groove agent?it doesn't get any easier than that.It has a
built in percussionist (GA3).It has allot of other cool features.
Even easier than that....how about a real drummer?what a concept! Rod is
available isn't he?and he doesn't even have to be there.
"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote in message news:47dc8622@linux...
>I just really hate the new 2.0. It's absolutely wayyyyy overblown with
>unnecessary crap that makes it basically scooterfucked IMO. If I buy EZ
>Drummer 2.0 and DFH Superior, will I have a decent sample library with
>percussion instruments and will I be glad I did or does it suck too? I just
>want something easy to use that sounds good. the only thing I can think of
>that suks worse then the new BFD is the old, original DFH.
>
>
>Not so good.
James McCloskey wrote:
> Check out these sounds, and let me know what you think.
>
> http://www.stevenslatedrums.com/
>
> Love the old Zep
> http://www.stevenslatedrums.com/demo2/OLDZEP7.mp3
>
> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>> I just really hate the new 2.0. It's absolutely wayyyyy overblown with
>> unnecessary crap that makes it basically scooterfucked IMO. If I buy EZ
>
>> Drummer 2.0 and DFH Superior, will I have a decent sample library with
>> percussion instruments and will I be glad I did or does it suck too? I just
>
>> want something easy to use that sounds good. the only thing I can think
> of
>> that suks worse then the new BFD is the old, original DFH.
>>
>>
>>
>Happy Sunday morning. Here's one for all of you guys (and some gals).
http://cgi.ebay.com/HILLARY-CLINTON-NUTCRACKER-NIB-BILLS-NUT -CRACKER_W0QQitemZ300206192633QQihZ020QQcategoryZ39721QQssPa geNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItemWould love to hear some of that. Are those frets made of wood?
Rich
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:47dbcb9e$1@linux...
>
> Hey all,
>
> I was walking from the Asok skytrain station to the subway yesterday and
> heard some really interesting music. It was two guys from Issan (one of
the
> poorer areas of a generally very poor country) playing music. One was on
> some makeshift drums (still, he had a cowbell!) and this is the other guy.
> Check out the guitar-like instrument, which is basically a board, a
pickup,
> and three strings with some frets placed in places them very odd to our
well-tempered
> selves.
>
> He could really flippin play as well. I dropped 50 baht into their tip jar
> and recorded about five minutes of music.
>
> TCBMike, I haven't downloaded any of these newer plug-ins. But I believe you
should make it a requirement to pay something for downloading them. Heck why
not even set a minimum price so that you are rewarded properly for all of
your efforts. I seem to remember paying around $50 smackaroos for NoLimit
and it was well worth it. It's just human nature to want to get something
for nothing, especially if you set it up that way, but I'll tell you
brother, nothing is free, except maybe air.
Rich
"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote in message news:47dc2fb5$1@linux...
>
> Hi All,
>
> I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with the PARIS
plugins.
> 20 People have donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at least 3 more
> before turning my attention to the driver.
>
> I also hope top start releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. With any
> luck, that will be within a month.
>
> I really hope these have meant something to people. I've had a great time
> working on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - both
having
> them and making them.
>
> The Amp was the hardest one yet. took probably around 75 hours to finish,
> and it built on countless hours learning about the plugins before. It's
> still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory into a register
> done by the logic unit is 4 times as loud (2 bits offset) as compared to
> the same MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug that took
> forever to track down.
>
> Anyway, it just doesn't feel right spending that kind of time and watching
> dozens and dozens of copies get downloaded when only 6 people cared enough
> to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person doesn't own PARIS
anymore,
> and another is waiting for a Mac version. So, of all the people who
downloaded
> and hopefully used the code, only 4 people gave anything for it.
>
> Anyway, the download links are gone. You can still pay anything you want
> - there are no set prices. But, access to the code will require sending
> "something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably set myself
> up for this. I can be a bit naive.
>
> All the best,
>
> Mike
>
>Hi Lamont,
I have a DP/4, and I like the hall reverb in it far more than the hall in
my Lexicon MPX1. It's just smoother, while the MPX1 has some grain to it.
As long as work isn't too busy - and the algo doesn't end up as much trouble
as the amp was - it shouldn't take me too long. I've got the .h file done.
The .cpp file and the .ini should come quickly.
I agree that the donation system is too tempting for some. I would prefer
to keep the pricing flexible. I don't want to deprive anyone of these plugins
if they can use them. I just don't want to feel taken advantage of.
Let me know what you think of the plugs when you get to using them. Feedback
is appreciated. :)
All the best,
Mike
"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Hey Mike, I have downloaded a single plugin as of yet. I plan to in the
near
>future, when I move my Paris rig over to our main studio. When, I do, I'll
>also give an deserving amount to this cause.. Keep up the great work..
>
>P.S.
>I have a DP4 & Pro and would love to have a few of those Hall reverb presets.
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote:
>>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with the PARIS plugins.
>> 20 People have donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at least 3 more
>>before turning my attention to the driver.
>>
>>I also hope top start releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. With
any
>>luck, that will be within a month.
>>
>>I really hope these have meant something to people. I've had a great time
>>working on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - both having
>>them and making them.
>>
>>The Amp was the hardest one yet. took probably around 75 hours to finish,
>>and it built on countless hours learning about the plugins before. It's
>>still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory into a register
>>done by the logic unit is 4 times as loud (2 bits offset) as compared to
>>the same MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug that took
>>forever to track down.
>>
>>Anyway, it just doesn't feel right spending that kind of time and watching
>>dozens and dozens of copies get downloaded when only 6 people cared enough
>>to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person doesn't own PARIS anymore,
>>and another is waiting for a Mac version. So, of all the people who downloaded
>>and hopefully used the code, only 4 people gave anything for it.
>>
>>Anyway, the download links are gone. You can still pay anything you want
>>- there are no set prices. But, access to the code will require sending
>>"something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably set myself
>>up for this. I can be a bit naive.
>>
>>All the best,
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>
>Hi Rich,
I think I just replied to you while replying to Lamont. I must not have
had any coffee yet. :)
I'd like to keep the pricing flexible because some people are truly broke.
I want everyone who can use a copy of these to have them. I just don't
want to feel taken advantage of. Having 50+ copies downloaded with almost
no comments of what people thought of them and very few donations felt kind
of shitty. I know people are busy and don't have time necessarily to look
at things right away. But I'll be honest, if it weren't for the few people
who have been supportive and given me feedback on things, I probably would
have stopped posting these.
I did some comparisons between the simalog JCM900 VST plugin, and I actually
prefer the simalog. But, I'll still use this plug at least to have a sound
while tracking, and also to add texture by varying the guitar sounds. It's
also got a really nice clean sound now. It is very useful to me.
All the best,
Mike
"Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote:
>Mike, I haven't downloaded any of these newer plug-ins. But I believe you
>should make it a requirement to pay something for downloading them. Heck
why
>not even set a minimum price so that you are rewarded properly for all of
>your efforts. I seem to remember paying around $50 smackaroos for NoLimit
>and it was well worth it. It's just human nature to want to get something
>for nothing, especially if you set it up that way, but I'll tell you
>brother, nothing is free, except maybe air.
>
>Rich
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote in message news:47dc2fb5$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with the PARIS
>plugins.
>> 20 People have donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at least 3
more
>> before turning my attention to the driver.
>>
>> I also hope top start releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. With
any
>> luck, that will be within a month.
>>
>> I really hope these have meant something to people. I've had a great
time
>> working on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - both
>having
>> them and making them.
>>
>> The Amp was the hardest one yet. took probably around 75 hours to finish,
>> and it built on countless hours learning about the plugins before. It's
>> still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory into a register
>> done by the logic unit is 4 times as loud (2 bits offset) as compared
to
>> the same MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug that took
>> forever to track down.
>>
>> Anyway, it just doesn't feel right spending that kind of time and watching
>> dozens and dozens of copies get downloaded when only 6 people cared enough
>> to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person doesn't own PARIS
>anymore,
>> and another is waiting for a Mac version. So, of all the people who
>downloaded
>> and hopefully used the code, only 4 people gave anything for it.
>>
>> Anyway, the download links are gone. You can still pay anything you want
>> - there are no set prices. But, access to the code will require sending
>> "something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably set myself
>> up for this. I can be a bit naive.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>
>was that humbucker really wired in?
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:47dbcb9e$1@linux...
>
> Hey all,
>
> I was walking from the Asok skytrain station to the subway yesterday and
> heard some really interesting music. It was two guys from Issan (one of
> the
> poorer areas of a generally very poor country) playing music. One was on
> some makeshift drums (still, he had a cowbell!) and this is the other guy.
> Check
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94514 is a reply to message #94458] |
Tue, 08 January 2008 23:22 |
Gene Lennon[4]
Messages: 26
Registered: November 2006
|
Junior Member |
|
|
re USB, not
>
>>firewire.
>>
>>Aaron Allen wrote:
>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>>> news:C40220B7.131DC%dterry@keyofd.net...
>>>> I only watched part due to time constraints so I didn't catch that (i.e.
>I
>>>> could tell early on there was nothing new here).
>>>>
>>>> Yes of course latency is *effectively* "zero" for the builtin dsp (in
>and
>>>> out of the onboard mixer), but not in and out of the native system.
>>>> Nothing
>>>> different from what Totalmix, Cuemix, Soundscape and TDM do, and while
>it
>>>> may be a few nanoseconds faster than others, it's still not *really*
>>>> 0.00000ns.
>>>
>>> That's not what I took away from what he was saying. Check out the video
>
>>> again when you get time dude, I think you may have missed the whole reason
>
>>> why I'd choose this system if I dumped Paris. What I didn't hear though
>was
>>> if I could stack these units, but I'm guessing not because of how fast
>they
>>> simply would have to be to be no latency units.
>>>
>>>> Of course we all know absolute zero is impossible without time travel
>;-)
>>>> There is always at least a few nanoseconds for gate setup/hold times
>in
>>>> the
>>>> converters, and in the dsp chips, etc, so regardless of "zero" or "near
>>>> zero" latency claims, they are all lower than most people care about
>since
>>>> it's hardware based routing, rather than latent software routing (which
>>>> actually could be nearly as fast if the OS were optimized for it - i.e.
>>>> systems like Radar, etc).
>>>
>>> very true, and what I wanted to hear about. Actual convertor to convertor
>
>>> latency cannot possibly be zero/none. Even Paris is hitting 1.5 mS end
>to
>>> end. And I have no problems living with that.
>>>
>>>> Marketing.... it's all marketing.... in reality, every single DAW on
>the
>>>> planet adheres to the same physical limitations - they just use different
>>>> packaging and emphasis of hardware vs. software. Good try Steiny/Yamaha.
>>>>
>>>> Dedric
>>>>
>>>> On 3/16/08 1:49 AM, in article 47dcc2fd$1@linux, "LaMont"
>>>> <jjdpro@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dedric, they are stating 'No' Latency as in Nada..zilch..Nothing..
hey
>>>>> mentioned
>>>>> this at least 5 times. They even critisize other companies claim of
>"near
>>>>> zero " latency.
>>>>>
>>>>> Look at the video again.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/15/08 10:50 PM, in article 47dcaa29@linux, "Aaron Allen"
>>>>>> <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>>>>> semi-pro/pro work because of the latency they can't seem to lick.
>
>>>>>>> Steiny
>>>>>>> apparantly has beat that now with the Yammy interface.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> How so? Was there mention of lower latencies I didn't see?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a firewire interface just like the Fireface, Firepod, etc, and
>
>>>>>> firewire
>>>>>> is inherently limited due to the extra buffering overhead. I can't
>see
>>>>> the
>>>>>> new Steinberg interface running at any lower latency than the Fireface,
>>>>> but
>>>>>> if they've beat that limit, kudos to Yamaha.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So far, imho RME seems to lead the low latency race overall with ASIO
>>>>>> drivers. Imho, until operating systems drop the consumer bloat war
>and
>>>>> get
>>>>>> down to really running lean and mean with true kernel level audio
>>>>>> drivers
>>>>>> (not the facade of core audio), we may never see lower than 32 samples,
>>>>>> unless Intel multiplies the number of cores and general buss/memory
>>>>>> processing exponentially to outpace the growing OS demands.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still have to wonder what got us to the point that an OS had to do
>
>>>>>> anything
>>>>>> more than boot and access the hardware.... but we've had that discussion
>>>>> a
>>>>>> few times already. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dedric
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>I have to agree. . . :( Sounds a little flabby/cardboardy (like BFD) :)
"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:47dd1359$1@linux...
> Not so good.
>
> James McCloskey wrote:
>> Check out these sounds, and let me know what you think.
>>
>> http://www.stevenslatedrums.com/
>>
>> Love the old Zep
>> http://www.stevenslatedrums.com/demo2/OLDZEP7.mp3
>>
>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>> I just really hate the new 2.0. It's absolutely wayyyyy overblown with
>>> unnecessary crap that makes it basically scooterfucked IMO. If I buy EZ
>>
>>> Drummer 2.0 and DFH Superior, will I have a decent sample library with
>>> percussion instruments and will I be glad I did or does it suck too? I
>>> just
>>
>>> want something easy to use that sounds good. the only thing I can think
>> of
>>> that suks worse then the new BFD is the old, original DFH.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Which?
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>I think this Hardware is "Married" to Cubase 4 . If you look gain at the
>video
>>2/3 (2:39-beyond) , they go into great detail how this units "Treats" Cubase
>>and the Hardware as ONE. Meaning, Cubase is just an "Extension" of the
unit.
>>ALso, meaning, that this unit must have a big piece of Cubase's software
>>"already" Built-In...!! That's how they can acheive "No -Latency" and do
>>all that clever Monitoring and even record the Builtin FX while monitoring..
>>Sweet..
>>
>>I think Yammy & Steiny "re-thought" the Native missing link(Latency) equation,
>>with what seems to be a quasi DSP meets Software .Already built-in the
units..
>>
>>
>>I have admit, having the ability to link 3 of these babys has me geeked!!
>>Because, Yammy & Stein are using Intelligent Firewire called M-Lan.. No
>other
>>Firewire interface can be daisy chained using the normal Firewire Protocol..
>>
>
>LaMont, I believe this is incorrect, there are other fireWire interfaces
>that are chain-able.
>
>>What's really interesting is that this is only the "First' Product from
>this
>>Marriage. We can can probably bet, that more products like their Sweet
N12
>>Mixer/controller is on the horizon. As it stands, this is a great first
>step..
>>
>>Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>>>Yeah, I was a little surprised no one asked the question about how
>>>exactly they achieved no latency at the end when they asked for
>>>questions. How do they do that I wonder? He specifically said all the
>>>Cubase channels stuff would be no latency.
>>>
>>>If they have that, then this has truly lived up to what I hoped for from
>>
>>>the merger. I will say this: Yamaha is overall the finest and most
>>>comprehensive large music manufacturer and their products always sound
>
>>>good. Since i have used Cubase from the early Atari version in '88 or
>>>'89, I am a pretty big fan of Steiny too.
>>>
>>>BTW he did say you could cascade 3 units, and he said they are USB, not
>>
>>>firewire.
>>>
>>>Aaron Allen wrote:
>>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:C40220B7.131DC%dterry@keyofd.net...
>>>>> I only watched part due to time constraints so I didn't catch that
(i.e.
>>I
>>>>> could tell early on there was nothing new here).
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes of course latency is *effectively* "zero" for the builtin dsp (in
>>and
>>>>> out of the onboard mixer), but not in and out of the native system.
>
>>>>> Nothing
>>>>> different from what Totalmix, Cuemix, Soundscape and TDM do, and while
>>it
>>>>> may be a few nanoseconds faster than others, it's still not *really*
>>>>> 0.00000ns.
>>>>
>>>> That's not what I took away from what he was saying. Check out the video
>>
>>>> again when you get time dude, I think you may have missed the whole
reason
>>
>>>> why I'd choose this system if I dumped Paris. What I didn't hear though
>>was
>>>> if I could stack these units, but I'm guessing not because of how fast
>>they
>>>> simply would have to be to be no latency units.
>>>>
>>>>> Of course we all know absolute zero is impossible without time travel
>>;-)
>>>>> There is always at least a few nanoseconds for gate setup/hold times
>>in
>>>>> the
>>>>> converters, and in the dsp chips, etc, so regardless of "zero" or "near
>>>>> zero" latency claims, they are all lower than most people care about
>>since
>>>>> it's hardware based routing, rather than latent software routing (which
>>>>> actually could be nearly as fast if the OS were optimized for it -
i.e.
>>>>> systems like Radar, etc).
>>>>
>>>> very true, and what I wanted to hear about. Actual convertor to convertor
>>
>>>> latency cannot possibly be zero/none. Even Paris is hitting 1.5 mS
end
>>to
>>>> end. And I have no problems living with that.
>>>>
>>>>> Marketing.... it's all marketing.... in reality, every single DAW
on
>>the
>>>>> planet adheres to the same physical limitations - they just use different
>>>>> packaging and emphasis of hardware vs. software. Good try Steiny/Yamaha.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dedric
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/16/08 1:49 AM, in article 47dcc2fd$1@linux, "LaMont"
>>>>> <jjdpro@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dedric, they are stating 'No' Latency as in Nada..zilch..Nothing..
>hey
>>>>>> mentioned
>>>>>> this at least 5 times. They even critisize other companies claim of
>>"near
>>>>>> zero " latency.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look at the video again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/15/08 10:50 PM, in article 47dcaa29@linux, "Aaron Allen"
>>>>>>> <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>>>>>> semi-pro/pro work because of the latency they can't seem to lick.
>>
>>>>>>>> Steiny
>>>>>>>> apparantly has beat that now with the Yammy interface.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How so? Was there mention of lower latencies I didn't see?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's a firewire interface just like the Fireface, Firepod, etc, and
>>
>>>>>>> firewire
>>>>>>> is inherently limited due to the extra buffering overhead. I can't
>>see
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> new Steinberg interface running at any lower latency than the Fireface,
>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> if they've beat that limit, kudos to Yamaha.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So far, imho RME seems to lead the low latency race overall with
ASIO
>>>>>>> drivers. Imho, until operating systems drop the consumer bloat war
>>and
>>>>>> get
>>>>>>> down to really running lean and mean with true kernel level audio
>
>>>>>>> drivers
>>>>>>> (not the facade of core audio), we may never see lower than 32 samples,
>>>>>>> unless Intel multiplies the number of cores and general buss/memory
>>>>>>> processing exponentially to outpace the growing OS demands.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still have to wonder what got us to the point that an OS had to do
>>
>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>> more than boot and access the hardware.... but we've had that discussion
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> few times already. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dedric
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>Watch the whole 3 videos..
They say not Zero latency, but No latency .. A non issue as far as they are
concerned.
Who knows???
Martin H
On 16/03/08 4:24 PM, in article C4020B2E.131D0%dterry@keyofd.net, "Dedric
Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
> On 3/15/08 10:50 PM, in article 47dcaa29@linux, "Aaron Allen"
> <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>> semi-pro/pro work because of the latency they can't seem to lick. Steiny
>> apparantly has beat that now with the Yammy interface.
>>
> How so? Was there mention of lower latencies I didn't see?
>
> It's a firewire interface just like the Fireface, Firepod, etc, and firewire
> is inherently limited due to the extra buffering overhead. I can't see the
> new Steinberg interface running at any lower latency than the Fireface, but
> if they've beat that limit, kudos to Yamaha.
>
> So far, imho RME seems to lead the low latency race overall with ASIO
> drivers. Imho, until operating systems drop the consumer bloat war and get
> down to really running lean and mean with true kernel level audio drivers
> (not the facade of core audio), we may never see lower than 32 samples,
> unless Intel multiplies the number of cores and general buss/memory
> processing exponentially to outpace the growing OS demands.
>
> Still have to wonder what got us to the point that an OS had to do anything
> more than boot and access the hardware.... but we've had that discussion a
> few times already. ;-)
>
> Dedric
>They said you can stack up to 3 units..
Martin H
On 17/03/08 1:45 AM, in article 47dd3589$1@linux, "Aaron Allen"
<know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>
> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
> news:C40220B7.131DC%dterry@keyofd.net...
>> I only watched part due to time constraints so I didn't catch that (i.e. I
>> could tell early on there was nothing new here).
>>
>> Yes of course latency is *effectively* "zero" for the builtin dsp (in and
>> out of the onboard mixer), but not in and out of the native system.
>> Nothing
>> different from what Totalmix, Cuemix, Soundscape and TDM do, and while it
>> may be a few nanoseconds faster than others, it's still not *really*
>> 0.00000ns.
>
> That's not what I took away from what he was saying. Check out the video
> again when you get time dude, I think you may have missed the whole reason
> why I'd choose this system if I dumped Paris. What I didn't hear though was
> if I could stack these units, but I'm guessing not because of how fast they
> simply would have to be to be no latency units.
>
>>
>> Of course we all know absolute zero is impossible without time travel ;-)
>> There is always at least a few nanoseconds for gate setup/hold times in
>> the
>> converters, and in the dsp chips, etc, so regardless of "zero" or "near
>> zero" latency claims, they are all lower than most people care about since
>> it's hardware based routing, rather than latent software routing (which
>> actually could be nearly as fast if the OS were optimized for it - i.e.
>> systems like Radar, etc).
>
> very true, and what I wanted to hear about. Actual convertor to convertor
> latency cannot possibly be zero/none. Even Paris is hitting 1.5 mS end to
> end. And I have no problems living with that.
>
>>
>> Marketing.... it's all marketing.... in reality, every single DAW on the
>> planet adheres to the same physical limitations - they just use different
>> packaging and emphasis of hardware vs. software. Good try Steiny/Yamaha.
>>
>> Dedric
>>
>> On 3/16/08 1:49 AM, in article 47dcc2fd$1@linux, "LaMont"
>> <jjdpro@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dedric, they are stating 'No' Latency as in Nada..zilch..Nothing.. hey
>>> mentioned
>>> this at least 5 times. They even critisize other companies claim of "near
>>> zero " latency.
>>>
>>> Look at the video again.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>> On 3/15/08 10:50 PM, in article 47dcaa29@linux, "Aaron Allen"
>>>> <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>>> semi-pro/pro work because of the latency they can't seem to lick.
>>>>> Steiny
>>>>> apparantly has beat that now with the Yammy interface.
>>>>>
>>>> How so? Was there mention of lower latencies I didn't see?
>>>>
>>>> It's a firewire interface just like the Fireface, Firepod, etc, and
>>>> firewire
>>>> is inherently limited due to the extra buffering overhead. I can't see
>>> the
>>>> new Steinberg interface running at any lower latency than the Fireface,
>>> but
>>>> if they've beat that limit, kudos to Yamaha.
>>>>
>>>> So far, imho RME seems to lead the low latency race overall with ASIO
>&g
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94515 is a reply to message #94514] |
Tue, 08 January 2008 23:02 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;>> drivers. Imho, until operating systems drop the consumer bloat war and
>>> get
>>>> down to really running lean and mean with true kernel level audio
>>>> drivers
>>>> (not the facade of core audio), we may never see lower than 32 samples,
>>>> unless Intel multiplies the number of cores and general buss/memory
>>>> processing exponentially to outpace the growing OS demands.
>>>>
>>>> Still have to wonder what got us to the point that an OS had to do
>>>> anything
>>>> more than boot and access the hardware.... but we've had that discussion
>>> a
>>>> few times already. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Dedric
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>Some of the MOTU products are expandable like the 828s. I believe I read
some where, that another companies FW interfaces are expandable???
"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Which?
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I think this Hardware is "Married" to Cubase 4 . If you look gain at the
>>video
>>>2/3 (2:39-beyond) , they go into great detail how this units "Treats"
Cubase
>>>and the Hardware as ONE. Meaning, Cubase is just an "Extension" of the
>unit.
>>>ALso, meaning, that this unit must have a big piece of Cubase's software
>>>"already" Built-In...!! That's how they can acheive "No -Latency" and
do
>>>all that clever Monitoring and even record the Builtin FX while monitoring..
>>>Sweet..
>>>
>>>I think Yammy & Steiny "re-thought" the Native missing link(Latency) equation,
>>>with what seems to be a quasi DSP meets Software .Already built-in the
>units..
>>>
>>>
>>>I have admit, having the ability to link 3 of these babys has me geeked!!
>>>Because, Yammy & Stein are using Intelligent Firewire called M-Lan.. No
>>other
>>>Firewire interface can be daisy chained using the normal Firewire Protocol..
>>>
>>
>>LaMont, I believe this is incorrect, there are other fireWire interfaces
>>that are chain-able.
>>
>>>What's really interesting is that this is only the "First' Product from
>>this
>>>Marriage. We can can probably bet, that more products like their Sweet
>N12
>>>Mixer/controller is on the horizon. As it stands, this is a great first
>>step..
>>>
>>>Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>>>>Yeah, I was a little surprised no one asked the question about how
>>>>exactly they achieved no latency at the end when they asked for
>>>>questions. How do they do that I wonder? He specifically said all the
>
>>>>Cubase channels stuff would be no latency.
>>>>
>>>>If they have that, then this has truly lived up to what I hoped for from
>>>
>>>>the merger. I will say this: Yamaha is overall the finest and most
>>>>comprehensive large music manufacturer and their products always sound
>>
>>>>good. Since i have used Cubase from the early Atari version in '88 or
>
>>>>'89, I am a pretty big fan of Steiny too.
>>>>
>>>>BTW he did say you could cascade 3 units, and he said they are USB, not
>>>
>>>>firewire.
>>>>
>>>>Aaron Allen wrote:
>>>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:C40220B7.131DC%dterry@keyofd.net...
>>>>>> I only watched part due to time constraints so I didn't catch that
>(i.e.
>>>I
>>>>>> could tell early on there was nothing new here).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes of course latency is *effectively* "zero" for the builtin dsp
(in
>>>and
>>>>>> out of the onboard mixer), but not in and out of the native system.
>>
>>>>>> Nothing
>>>>>> different from what Totalmix, Cuemix, Soundscape and TDM do, and while
>>>it
>>>>>> may be a few nanoseconds faster than others, it's still not *really*
>>>>>> 0.00000ns.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not what I took away from what he was saying. Check out the
video
>>>
>>>>> again when you get time dude, I think you may have missed the whole
>reason
>>>
>>>>> why I'd choose this system if I dumped Paris. What I didn't hear though
>>>was
>>>>> if I could stack these units, but I'm guessing not because of how fast
>>>they
>>>>> simply would have to be to be no latency units.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course we all know absolute zero is impossible without time travel
>>>;-)
>>>>>> There is always at least a few nanoseconds for gate setup/hold times
>>>in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> converters, and in the dsp chips, etc, so regardless of "zero" or
"near
>>>>>> zero" latency claims, they are all lower than most people care about
>>>since
>>>>>> it's hardware based routing, rather than latent software routing (which
>>>>>> actually could be nearly as fast if the OS were optimized for it -
>i.e.
>>>>>> systems like Radar, etc).
>>>>>
>>>>> very true, and what I wanted to hear about. Actual convertor to convertor
>>>
>>>>> latency cannot possibly be zero/none. Even Paris is hitting 1.5 mS
>end
>>>to
>>>>> end. And I have no problems living with that.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Marketing.... it's all marketing.... in reality, every single DAW
>on
>>>the
>>>>>> planet adheres to the same physical limitations - they just use different
>>>>>> packaging and emphasis of hardware vs. software. Good try Steiny/Yamaha.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dedric
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/16/08 1:49 AM, in article 47dcc2fd$1@linux, "LaMont"
>>>>>> <jjdpro@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dedric, they are stating 'No' Latency as in Nada..zilch..Nothing..
>>hey
>>>>>>> mentioned
>>>>>>> this at least 5 times. They even critisize other companies claim
of
>>>"near
>>>>>>> zero " latency.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Look at the video again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/15/08 10:50 PM, in article 47dcaa29@linux, "Aaron Allen"
>>>>>>>> <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> semi-pro/pro work because of the latency they can't seem to lick.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Steiny
>>>>>>>>> apparantly has beat that now with the Yammy interface.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How so? Was there mention of lower latencies I didn't see?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's a firewire interface just like the Fireface, Firepod, etc,
and
>>>
>>>>>>>> firewire
>>>>>>>> is inherently limited due to the extra buffering overhead. I can't
>>>see
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> new Steinberg interface running at any lower latency than the Fireface,
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>> if they've beat that limit, kudos to Yamaha.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So far, imho RME seems to lead the low latency race overall with
>ASIO
>>>>>>>> drivers. Imho, until operating systems drop the consumer bloat
war
>>>and
>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>> down to really running lean and mean with true kernel level audio
>>
>>>>>>>> drivers
>>>>>>>> (not the facade of core audio), we may never see lower than 32 samples,
>>>>>>>> unless Intel multiplies the number of cores and general buss/memory
>>>>>>>> processing exponentially to outpace the growing OS demands.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still have to wonder what got us to the point that an OS had to
do
>>>
>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>> more than boot and access the hardware.... but we've had that discussion
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> few times already. ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dedric
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>Umm...
Boycotting can be used as a threat / punishment when the boycotter is larger
than the boycottee. Once a boycott is in place the impact is on both sides,
so unless the boycotter is large enough that the boycott impacts their target
more than themselves...?
Given China has a larger economy than the U.S. now, and given most of their
trading is within Asia and Europe, having the U.S.A. boycott Chinese trade
would be absolutely identical to simply asking China to boycott trade with
you. They're bigger. You'd only hurt yourselves. It would be like Iraq boycotting
trade with the U.S... you'd be like "Umm, who cares? You're just hurting
yourselves".
Sucks not to be the biggest eh...?
Cheers,
Kim.
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>I think it's time to boycott China and their products, there is no sense
in
>supporting this government in any way.
>
>http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VELU0G0.html
>
>http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VEM3KG0.htmlOn 3/16/08 5:45 PM, in article 47dda2fd$1@linux, "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Which?
>
> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> LaMont, I believe this is incorrect, there are other fireWire interfaces
>> that are chain-able.
>>
RME Fireface for one - it has a second FW400 port for running multiple units
in parallel (FW800 connection to the PC/Mac side required).
From the ad blurbs it says the dsp is available in Cubase - which could be
simply like other firewire dsp boxes (Powercore, Duende, etc) that give you
VST access to onboard dsp plugins. That part could be tied to Cubase, but
though it doesn't say so, so my guess is the dsp is most likely VST, and the
audio is ASIO, so any VST/ASIO app should be able to use it.
I wouldn't go by a product demonstration as the final word. Wait until the
units hit the streets and/or more info shows up on it.
I also wouldn't sell your PCI/PCIe gear for a firewire solution... DJ. ;-)
Dedric. . . not to mention asking Americans to boycott anything is like asking
them to voluntarily give up their teeth. We are completely addicted to
comfort and convenience and in general would not give up so much as a single
square of toilet paper to make the world a better place.
Sarah
Cynical former organizer of product boycotts
"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:47dd8dd0@linux...
>I don't think boycotting is the answer. It would hurt average Chinese
>people the most, anyway.
>
> The answer is more communication. Commerce is a form of communication and
> as such, I think more commerce will inevitably bring about a metamorphose
> of the Chinese government. I would prefer to see a peaceful evolution
> rather than a bloody revolution.
>
> Boycotting would get the government hardliners backs up. And
> realistically, your boycott wouldn't "...amount to a hill of beans in this
> world." (add Bogart lisp)
>
> I appreciate your desire to change the situation, but I would suggest
> finding a constructive way to communicate a lot into China, to people, the
> government, anywhere. Comm is the solution. Tell them about freedom.
> Freedom appeals to everybody.
>
> James McCloskey wrote:
>> I think it's time to boycott China and their products, there is no sense
>> in
>> supporting this government in any way.
>>
>> http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VELU0G0.html
>>
>> http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VEM3KG0.html"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote:
>
>Hi All,
>
>I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with the PARIS plugins.
> 20 People have donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at least 3 more
>before turning my attention to the driver.
>
>I also hope top start releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. With any
>luck, that will be within a month.
>
>I really hope these have meant something to people. I've had a great time
>working on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - both having
>them and making them.
>
>The Amp was the hardest one yet. took probably around 75 hours to finish,
>and it built on countless hours learning about the plugins before. It's
>still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory into a register
>done by the logic unit is 4 times as loud (2 bits offset) as compared to
>the same MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug that took
>forever to track down.
>
>Anyway, it just doesn't feel right spending that kind of time and watching
>dozens and dozens of copies get downloaded when only 6 people cared enough
>to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person doesn't own PARIS anymore,
>and another is waiting for a Mac version. So, of all the people who downloaded
>and hopefully used the code, only 4 people gave anything for it.
>
>Anyway, the download links are gone. You can still pay anything you want
>- there are no set prices. But, access to the code will require sending
>"something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably set myself
>up for this. I can be a bit naive.
>
>All the best,
>
>Mike
>
>it might help if I actually type something!
Mike, I really appreciate your efforts on the plugs. I have download all
of them, but, and this is the truth, I havn't had time to load any of them
into my Paris comp yet. I fully intended to send you some dough once I loaded
them in, but I'll send you some now. I'll get around to installing them eventually.
Thanks for all your hard work!
Rod
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote:
>>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with the PARIS plugins.
>> 20 People have donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at least 3 more
>>before turning my attention to the driver.
>>
>>I also hope top start releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. With
any
>>luck, that will be within a month.
>>
>>I really hope these have meant something to people. I've had a great time
>>working on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - both having
>>them and making them.
>>
>>The Amp was the hardest one yet. took probably around 75 hours to finish,
>>and it built on countless hours learning about the plugins before. It's
>>still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory into a register
>>done by the logic unit is 4 times as loud (2 bits offset) as compared to
>>the same MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug that took
>>forever to track down.
>>
>>Anyway, it just doesn't feel right spending that kind of time and watching
>>dozens and dozens of copies get downloaded when only 6 people cared enough
>>to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person doesn't own PARIS anymore,
>>and another is waiting for a Mac version. So, of all the people who downloaded
>>and hopefully used the code, only 4 people gave anything for it.
>>
>>Anyway, the download links are gone. You can still pay anything you want
>>- there are no set prices. But, access to the code will require sending
>>"something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably set myself
>>up for this. I can be a bit naive.
>>
>>All the best,
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>
>Man this thread is eye opening. Steven Slate actually has a great reputation,
for
the right application. To each his/her own.
Ted
"Al" <no@no.com> wrote:
>
>Wow. That has to be a joke, right? Those sounds are terrible. How could
>they get all those fancy folks to say otherwise? Sounds like a drum machine
>floating in a sea of 12 bit reverb with the mix on 100%.
>
>-Al
>
>John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>Not so good.
>>
>>James McCloskey wrote:
>>> Check out these sounds, and let me know what you think.
>>>
>>> http://www.stevenslatedrums.com/
>>>
>>> Love the old Zep
>>> http://www.stevenslatedrums.com/demo2/OLDZEP7.mp3
>>>
>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>> I just really hate the new 2.0. It's absolutely wayyyyy overblown with
>
>>>> unnecessary crap that makes it basically scooterfucked IMO. If I buy
>EZ
>>>
>>>> Drummer 2.0 and DFH Superior, will I have a decent sample library with
>
>>>> percussion instruments and will I be glad I did or does it suck too?
>I just
>>>
>>>> want something easy to use that sounds good. the only thing I can think
>>> of
>>>> that suks worse then the new BFD is the old, original DFH.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>DJ, I thought you were all over BFD. I just finally bought Drumagog
and was planning to use the BFD capability. Hmmm...
Ted
"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>I just really hate the new 2.0. It's absolutely wayyyyy overblown with
>unnecessary crap that makes it basically scooterfucked IMO. If I buy EZ
>Drummer 2.0 and DFH Superior, will I have a decent sample library with
>percussion instruments and will I be glad I did or does it suck too? I just
>want something easy to use that sounds good. the only thing I can think
of
>that suks worse then the new BFD is the old, original DFH.
>
>
>Thanks Deej. Did you use the 1288mb version or the 256mb one? Does it matter
at all or would either work?
Thanks.
"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>I did use a PCI and AGP and they worked well as long as the PCI card didn't
>share IRQ with the Paris card. Use the PCI card in a slot that shares with
>the AGP and you're good.
>
>
>
>"Luiz Orsano" <orsano@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:47dd6ee5$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Deej posted a while back about these video cards, and I was wondering
if
>> anyone was still using them with Paris. I'm in the process of getting
some
>> new video cards after my Radeon cards started giving me trouble. I'm
>> looking
>> for a 2-card configuration (one PCI and one AGP) for four displays. I'm
>> using
>> an ASUS A7S333 mobo. Deej seemed to have good experience with them, but
>> it's
>> been a while. They are available is 128mb and 256mb versions. Which one
>> should
>> be best? Any info would be greatly appreciated!
>>
>> Luiz
>
>Hey Aaron,
Thanks, man. Which version of the card do you have? Both 128mb or 256mb?
Does it matter?
Thanks.
Luiz
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>I"m using PCI and AGP nVidia cards on the Asus A7S333 here.. zero hassles,
>best the video has ever run in fact. ATI stunk and Matrox was marginally
>evil.
>
>AA
>
>
>"Luiz Orsano" <orsano@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:47dd6ee5$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Deej posted a while back about these video cards, and I was wondering
if
>> anyone was still using them with Paris. I'm in the process of getting
some
>> new video cards after my Radeon cards started giving me trouble. I'm
>> looking
>> for a 2-card configuration (one PCI and one AGP) for four displays. I'm
>> using
>> an ASUS A7S333 mobo. Deej seemed to have good experience with them, but
>> it's
>> been a while. They are available is 128mb and 256mb versions. Which one
>> should
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94517 is a reply to message #94515] |
Wed, 09 January 2008 06:50 |
Gene Lennon[4]
Messages: 26
Registered: November 2006
|
Junior Member |
|
|
ers of your creation to pay for your toil and dedication, unless
>you don't need the money :-) We all appreciate your efforts and frankly
I'm
>impressed that skunkworks and you are still busy writing code for the
>platform. I just wish Edmond would wake up and start writing a new version
>of Paris. That would really help us out. But Paris still rocks.
>
>Rich
>
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote in message news:47dd2cc4@linux...
>>
>> Hi Rich,
>>
>> I think I just replied to you while replying to Lamont. I must not have
>> had any coffee yet. :)
>>
>> I'd like to keep the pricing flexible because some people are truly broke.
>> I want everyone who can use a copy of these to have them. I just don't
>> want to feel taken advantage of. Having 50+ copies downloaded with almost
>> no comments of what people thought of them and very few donations felt
>kind
>> of shitty. I know people are busy and don't have time necessarily to
look
>> at things right away. But I'll be honest, if it weren't for the few
>people
>> who have been supportive and given me feedback on things, I probably would
>> have stopped posting these.
>>
>> I did some comparisons between the simalog JCM900 VST plugin, and I
>actually
>> prefer the simalog. But, I'll still use this plug at least to have a
>sound
>> while tracking, and also to add texture by varying the guitar sounds.
>It's
>> also got a really nice clean sound now. It is very useful to me.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote:
>> >Mike, I haven't downloaded any of these newer plug-ins. But I believe
you
>> >should make it a requirement to pay something for downloading them. Heck
>> why
>> >not even set a minimum price so that you are rewarded properly for all
of
>> >your efforts. I seem to remember paying around $50 smackaroos for NoLimit
>> >and it was well worth it. It's just human nature to want to get something
>> >for nothing, especially if you set it up that way, but I'll tell you
>> >brother, nothing is free, except maybe air.
>> >
>> >Rich
>> >
>> >"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote in message news:47dc2fb5$1@linux...
>> >>
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with the PARIS
>> >plugins.
>> >> 20 People have donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at least
3
>> more
>> >> before turning my attention to the driver.
>> >>
>> >> I also hope top start releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. With
>> any
>> >> luck, that will be within a month.
>> >>
>> >> I really hope these have meant something to people. I've had a great
>> time
>> >> working on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - both
>> >having
>> >> them and making them.
>> >>
>> >> The Amp was the hardest one yet. took probably around 75 hours to
>finish,
>> >> and it built on countless hours learning about the plugins before.
>It's
>> >> still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory into a
>register
>> >> done by the logic unit is 4 times as loud (2 bits offset) as compared
>> to
>> >> the same MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug that
>took
>> >> forever to track down.
>> >>
>> >> Anyway, it just doesn't feel right spending that kind of time and
>watching
>> >> dozens and dozens of copies get downloaded when only 6 people cared
>enough
>> >> to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person doesn't own PARIS
>> >anymore,
>> >> and another is waiting for a Mac version. So, of all the people who
>> >downloaded
>> >> and hopefully used the code, only 4 people gave anything for it.
>> >>
>> >> Anyway, the download links are gone. You can still pay anything you
>want
>> >> - there are no set prices. But, access to the code will require
>sending
>> >> "something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably set
>myself
>> >> up for this. I can be a bit naive.
>> >>
>> >> All the best,
>> >>
>> >> Mike
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>I'm diggin' it... nice job! I agree with Aaron with regard to
the way a couple of levels catch you by surprise & kinda wreck
the groove, but other than that I think it's very cool!
Neil
Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>
>
>Rich Lamanna wrote:
>> Awesome, very nice space created in the mix. Nice song, arrangement and
>> feel. The drums seem to fade in and out, I like the effect. Overall it's
>> full of emotion, feeling, lightness and air, but I'm not sure if I would
>> have used so much reverb, but that's personal. I don't think I could have
>> created this type of a mix myself. I'd like to hang out in your studio
and
>> get some pointers :-)
>
>I agree. That's some hip work.
>
>>
>> Rich
>>
>> "Mike R" <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:47dd40b1$1@linux...
>>> Sorry about the deadlink earlier.
>>> Any feedback at all is welcome.
>>> MR
>>
>>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C887B2.FD42C8C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey Mike,
I have joyfully downloaded all of your work and tried to be
fair with my contributions each time. I am sorry to not have
commented on your amp plugin as of yet. I have not had a chance
to load it much less try it. I'm excited just the same!
Needless to say your work is keeping me motivated about my continued
success with Paris. I look forward to all of your releases and will =
gladly
contribute as usual. I have a couple buds that will probably be =
downloading=20
and contributing also.
Tom
"Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote in message news:47ddcdaf$1@linux...
Hi Rich,
Thanks for your kind words! This is a really new experience for me. =
I've
used the simalog plugins for years, and I never thanked the guy who =
wrote
those. I sent him an email this morning.
For me, I toil over them forever, and then get really excited to get =
them
out into the world, and it's just such a letdown when after weeks of =
work,
you get it out and there are zillion posts about other systems, =
politics,
whatever, and a new, real-time PARIS amp plugin gets almost no comment =
or
response. It feels like I made a huge dinner, lots of people came and =
ate,
but almost no one thanked the cook.
Anyway, I'll just have to grow some thicker skin, I think.
Cheers,
Mike
"Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote:
>You're a good guy Mike. You must have had your coffee by now. I know =
where
>you're coming from, your heart. But you can still be a good person =
and
>expect users of your creation to pay for your toil and dedication, =
unless
>you don't need the money :-) We all appreciate your efforts and =
frankly
I'm
>impressed that skunkworks and you are still busy writing code for the
>platform. I just wish Edmond would wake up and start writing a new =
version
>of Paris. That would really help us out. But Paris still rocks.
>
>Rich
>
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote in message news:47dd2cc4@linux...
>>
>> Hi Rich,
>>
>> I think I just replied to you while replying to Lamont. I must not =
have
>> had any coffee yet. :)
>>
>> I'd like to keep the pricing flexible because some people are truly =
broke.
>> I want everyone who can use a copy of these to have them. I just =
don't
>> want to feel taken advantage of. Having 50+ copies downloaded with =
almost
>> no comments of what people thought of them and very few donations =
felt
>kind
>> of shitty. I know people are busy and don't have time necessarily =
to
look
>> at things right away. But I'll be honest, if it weren't for the =
few
>people
>> who have been supportive and given me feedback on things, I =
probably would
>> have stopped posting these.
>>
>> I did some comparisons between the simalog JCM900 VST plugin, and I
>actually
>> prefer the simalog. But, I'll still use this plug at least to have =
a
>sound
>> while tracking, and also to add texture by varying the guitar =
sounds.
>It's
>> also got a really nice clean sound now. It is very useful to me.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote:
>> >Mike, I haven't downloaded any of these newer plug-ins. But I =
believe
you
>> >should make it a requirement to pay something for downloading =
them. Heck
>> why
>> >not even set a minimum price so that you are rewarded properly for =
all
of
>> >your efforts. I seem to remember paying around $50 smackaroos for =
NoLimit
>> >and it was well worth it. It's just human nature to want to get =
something
>> >for nothing, especially if you set it up that way, but I'll tell =
you
>> >brother, nothing is free, except maybe air.
>> >
>> >Rich
>> >
>> >"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote in message news:47dc2fb5$1@linux...
>> >>
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with the =
PARIS
>> >plugins.
>> >> 20 People have donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at =
least
3
>> more
>> >> before turning my attention to the driver.
>> >>
>> >> I also hope top start releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. =
With
>> any
>> >> luck, that will be within a month.
>> >>
>> >> I really hope these have meant something to people. I've had a =
great
>> time
>> >> working on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - =
both
>> >having
>> >> them and making them.
>> >>
>> >> The Amp was the hardest one yet. took probably around 75 hours =
to
>finish,
>> >> and it built on countless hours learning about the plugins =
before.
>It's
>> >> still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory into a
>register
>> >> done by the logic unit is 4 times as loud (2 bits offset) as =
compared
>> to
>> >> the same MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug =
that
>took
>> >> forever to track down.
>> >>
>> >> Anyway, it just doesn't feel right spending that kind of time =
and
>watching
>> >> dozens and dozens of copies get downloaded when only 6 people =
cared
>enough
>> >> to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person doesn't own =
PARIS
>> >anymore,
>> >> and another is waiting for a Mac version. So, of all the people =
who
>> >downloaded
>> >> and hopefully used the code, only 4 people gave anything for it.
>> >>
>> >> Anyway, the download links are gone. You can still pay anything =
you
>want
>> >> - there are no set prices. But, access to the code will require
>sending
>> >> "something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably =
set
>myself
>> >> up for this. I can be a bit naive.
>> >>
>> >> All the best,
>> >>
>> >> Mike
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C887B2.FD42C8C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2180" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hey Mike,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have joyfully downloaded all of your =
work and=20
tried to be</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>fair with my contributions each =
time. I am=20
sorry to not have</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>commented on your amp plugin as of =
yet. I=20
have not had a chance</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>to load it much less try it. I'm =
excited just=20
the same!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Needless to say your work is keeping=20
me motivated about my continued</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>success with Paris. I look =
forward to=20
all of your releases and will gladly</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>contribute as usual. I have a =
couple buds=20
that will probably be downloading </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>and contributing also.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:47ddcdaf$1@linux">news:47ddcdaf$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>Hi=20
Rich,<BR><BR>Thanks for your kind words! This is a really new =
experience=20
for me. I've<BR>used the simalog plugins for years, and I never =
thanked=20
the guy who wrote<BR>those. I sent him an email this =
morning.<BR><BR>For=20
me, I toil over them forever, and then get really excited to get =
them<BR>out=20
into the world, and it's just such a letdown when after weeks of =
work,<BR>you=20
get it out and there are zillion posts about other systems,=20
politics,<BR>whatever, and a new, real-time PARIS amp plugin gets =
almost no=20
comment or<BR>response. It feels like I made a huge dinner, lots =
of=20
people came and ate,<BR>but almost no one thanked the =
cook.<BR><BR>Anyway,=20
I'll just have to grow some thicker skin, I=20
think.<BR><BR>Cheers,<BR><BR>Mike<BR><BR>"Rich Lamanna" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:richard.lamanna@verizon.net">richard.lamanna@verizon.net</=
A>>=20
wrote:<BR>>You're a good guy Mike. You must have had your coffee by =
now. I=20
know where<BR>>you're coming from, your heart. But you can still be =
a good=20
person and<BR>>expect users of your creation to pay for your toil =
and=20
dedication, unless<BR>>you don't need the money :-) We all =
appreciate your=20
efforts and frankly<BR>I'm<BR>>impressed that skunkworks and you =
are still=20
busy writing code for the<BR>>platform. I just wish Edmond would =
wake up=20
and start writing a new version<BR>>of Paris. That would really =
help us=20
out. But Paris still =
rocks.<BR>><BR>>Rich<BR>><BR>> <BR>>"Mike=20
Audet" <mike@..> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:47dd2cc4@linux">news:47dd2cc4@linux</A>...<BR>>><BR>&g=
t;>=20
Hi Rich,<BR>>><BR>>> I think I just replied to you while =
replying=20
to Lamont. I must not have<BR>>> had any coffee yet.=20
:)<BR>>><BR>>> I'd like to keep the pricing flexible =
because some=20
people are truly broke.<BR>>> I want everyone who can use =
a copy=20
of these to have them. I just don't<BR>>> want to =
feel taken=20
advantage of. Having 50+ copies downloaded with almost<BR>>> no =
comments=20
of what people thought of them and very few donations=20
felt<BR>>kind<BR>>> of shitty. I know people are busy =
and don't=20
have time necessarily to<BR>look<BR>>> at things right =
away. But=20
I'll be honest, if it weren't for the few<BR>>people<BR>>> =
who have=20
been supportive and given me feedback on things, I probably =
would<BR>>>=20
have stopped posting these.<BR>>><BR>>> I did some =
comparisons=20
between the simalog JCM900 VST plugin, and =
I<BR>>actually<BR>>>=20
prefer the simalog. But, I'll still use this plug at least to =
have=20
a<BR>>sound<BR>>> while tracking, and also to add texture by =
varying=20
the guitar sounds.<BR>>It's<BR>>> also got a really nice =
clean sound=20
now. It is very useful to me.<BR>>><BR>>> All the=20
best,<BR>>>=20
=
Mike<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> <BR>>><BR>>><BR>>&=
gt;<BR>>>=20
"Rich Lamanna" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:richard.lamanna@verizon.net">richard.lamanna@verizon.net</=
A>>=20
wrote:<BR>>> >Mike, I haven't downloaded any of these newer =
plug-ins.=20
But I believe<BR>you<BR>>> >should make it a requirement to =
pay=20
something for downloading them. Heck<BR>>> why<BR>>> =
>not even=20
set a minimum price so that you are rewarded properly for=20
all<BR>of<BR>>> >your efforts. I seem to remember paying =
around $50=20
smackaroos for NoLimit<BR>>> >and it was well worth it. It's =
just=20
human nature to want to get something<BR>>> >for nothing, =
especially=20
if you set it up that way, but I'll tell you<BR>>> >brother, =
nothing=20
is free, except maybe air.<BR>>> ><BR>>> =
>Rich<BR>>>=20
><BR>>> >"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:47dc2fb5$1@linux">news:47dc2fb5$1@linux</A>...<BR>>>=20
>><BR>>> >> Hi All,<BR>>> >><BR>>> =
>> I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with =
the=20
PARIS<BR>>> >plugins.<BR>>> >> 20 People =
have=20
donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at =
least<BR>3<BR>>>=20
more<BR>>> >> before turning my attention to the=20
driver.<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> I also hope top =
start=20
releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. With<BR>>>=20
any<BR>>> >> luck, that will be within a =
month.<BR>>>=20
>><BR>>> >> I really hope these have meant something =
to=20
people. I've had a great<BR>>> time<BR>>> >> =
working=20
on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - =
both<BR>>>=20
>having<BR>>> >> them and making them.<BR>>>=20
>><BR>>> >> The Amp was the hardest one yet. took =
probably=20
around 75 hours to<BR>>finish,<BR>>> >> and it built on =
countless hours learning about the plugins =
before.<BR>>It's<BR>>>=20
>> still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory =
into=20
a<BR>>register<BR>>> >> done by the logic unit is 4 =
times as=20
loud (2 bits offset) as compared<BR>>> to<BR>>> >> =
the same=20
MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug=20
that<BR>>took<BR>>> >> forever to track =
down.<BR>>>=20
>><BR>>> >> Anyway, it just doesn't feel right =
spending that=20
kind of time and<BR>>watching<BR>>> >> dozens and =
dozens of=20
copies get downloaded when only 6 people =
cared<BR>>enough<BR>>>=20
>> to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person =
doesn't own=20
PARIS<BR>>> >anymore,<BR>>> >> and another is =
waiting for=20
a Mac version. So, of all the people who<BR>>>=20
>downloaded<BR>>> >> and hopefully used the code, only =
4 people=20
gave anything for it.<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> =
Anyway, the=20
download links are gone. You can still pay anything=20
you<BR>>want<BR>>> >> - there are no set prices. =
But,=20
access to the code will require<BR>>sending<BR>>> >>=20
"something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I =
probably=20
set<BR>>myself<BR>>> >> up for this. I can be a =
bit=20
naive.<BR>>> >><BR
|
|
|
|
| Re: Euphonix MC Control and Mix Announced [message #94521 is a reply to message #94514] |
Wed, 09 January 2008 11:59 |
|
|
en get really excited to get =
>them
> out into the world, and it's just such a letdown when after weeks of =
>work,
> you get it out and there are zillion posts about other systems, =
>politics,
> whatever, and a new, real-time PARIS amp plugin gets almost no comment
=
>or
> response. It feels like I made a huge dinner, lots of people came and
=
>ate,
> but almost no one thanked the cook.
>
> Anyway, I'll just have to grow some thicker skin, I think.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike
>
> "Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote:
> >You're a good guy Mike. You must have had your coffee by now. I know
=
>where
> >you're coming from, your heart. But you can still be a good person =
>and
> >expect users of your creation to pay for your toil and dedication, =
>unless
> >you don't need the money :-) We all appreciate your efforts and =
>frankly
> I'm
> >impressed that skunkworks and you are still busy writing code for the
> >platform. I just wish Edmond would wake up and start writing a new =
>version
> >of Paris. That would really help us out. But Paris still rocks.
> >
> >Rich
> >
> >
> >"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote in message news:47dd2cc4@linux...
> >>
> >> Hi Rich,
> >>
> >> I think I just replied to you while replying to Lamont. I must not
=
>have
> >> had any coffee yet. :)
> >>
> >> I'd like to keep the pricing flexible because some people are truly
=
>broke.
> >> I want everyone who can use a copy of these to have them. I just
=
>don't
> >> want to feel taken advantage of. Having 50+ copies downloaded with
=
>almost
> >> no comments of what people thought of them and very few donations =
>felt
> >kind
> >> of shitty. I know people are busy and don't have time necessarily
=
>to
> look
> >> at things right away. But I'll be honest, if it weren't for the =
>few
> >people
> >> who have been supportive and given me feedback on things, I =
>probably would
> >> have stopped posting these.
> >>
> >> I did some comparisons between the simalog JCM900 VST plugin, and I
> >actually
> >> prefer the simalog. But, I'll still use this plug at least to have
=
>a
> >sound
> >> while tracking, and also to add texture by varying the guitar =
>sounds.
> >It's
> >> also got a really nice clean sound now. It is very useful to me.
> >>
> >> All the best,
> >> Mike
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote:
> >> >Mike, I haven't downloaded any of these newer plug-ins. But I =
>believe
> you
> >> >should make it a requirement to pay something for downloading =
>them. Heck
> >> why
> >> >not even set a minimum price so that you are rewarded properly for
=
>all
> of
> >> >your efforts. I seem to remember paying around $50 smackaroos for
=
>NoLimit
> >> >and it was well worth it. It's just human nature to want to get =
>something
> >> >for nothing, especially if you set it up that way, but I'll tell =
>you
> >> >brother, nothing is free, except maybe air.
> >> >
> >> >Rich
> >> >
> >> >"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote in message news:47dc2fb5$1@linux...
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi All,
> >> >>
> >> >> I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with the =
>PARIS
> >> >plugins.
> >> >> 20 People have donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at =
>least
> 3
> >> more
> >> >> before turning my attention to the driver.
> >> >>
> >> >> I also hope top start releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible.
=
> With
> >> any
> >> >> luck, that will be within a month.
> >> >>
> >> >> I really hope these have meant something to people. I've had a
=
>great
> >> time
> >> >> working on them, and they really are a dream come true for me -
=
>both
> >> >having
> >> >> them and making them.
> >> >>
> >> >> The Amp was the hardest one yet. took probably around 75 hours =
>to
> >finish,
> >> >> and it built on countless hours learning about the plugins =
>before.
> >It's
> >> >> still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory into a
> >register
> >> >> done by the logic unit is 4 times as loud (2 bits offset) as =
>compared
> >> to
> >> >> the same MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug
=
>that
> >took
> >> >> forever to track down.
> >> >>
> >> >> Anyway, it just doesn't feel right spending that kind of time =
>and
> >watching
> >> >> dozens and dozens of copies get downloaded when only 6 people =
>cared
> >enough
> >> >> to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person doesn't own
=
>PARIS
> >> >anymore,
> >> >> and another is waiting for a Mac version. So, of all the people
=
>who
> >> >downloaded
> >> >> and hopefully used the code, only 4 people gave anything for it.
> >> >>
> >> >> Anyway, the download links are gone. You can still pay anything
=
>you
> >want
> >> >> - there are no set prices. But, access to the code will require
> >sending
> >> >> "something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably =
>set
> >myself
> >> >> up for this. I can be a bit naive.
> >> >>
> >> >> All the best,
> >> >>
> >> >> Mike
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2180" name=3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hey Mike,</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have joyfully downloaded all of your
=
>work and=20
>tried to be</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>fair with my contributions each =
>time. I am=20
>sorry to not have</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>commented on your amp plugin as of =
>yet. I=20
>have not had a chance</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>to load it much less try it. I'm =
>excited just=20
>the same!</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Needless to say your work is keeping=20
>me motivated about my continued</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>success with Paris. I look =
>forward to=20
>all of your releases and will gladly</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>contribute as usual. I have a =
>couple buds=20
>that will probably be downloading </FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>and contributing also.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><BLOCKQUOTE=20
>style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV>"Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote in message <A=20
> =
>href=3D"news:47ddcdaf$1@linux">news:47ddcdaf$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>Hi=20
> Rich,<BR><BR>Thanks for your kind words! This is a really new =
>experience=20
> for me. I've<BR>used the simalog plugins for years, and I never =
>thanked=20
> the guy who wrote<BR>those. I sent him an email this =
>morning.<BR><BR>For=20
> me, I toil over them forever, and then get really excited to get =
>them<BR>out=20
> into the world, and it's just such a letdown when after weeks of =
>work,<BR>you=20
> get it out and there are zillion posts about other systems,=20
> politics,<BR>whatever, and a new, real-time PARIS amp plugin gets =
>almost no=20
> comment or<BR>response. It feels like I made a huge dinner, lots =
>of=20
> people came and ate,<BR>but almost no one thanked the =
>cook.<BR><BR>Anyway,=20
> I'll just have to grow some thicker skin, I=20
> think.<BR><BR>Cheers,<BR><BR>Mike<BR><BR>"Rich Lamanna" <<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:richard.lamanna@verizon.net">richard.lamanna@verizon.net</=
>A>>=20
> wrote:<BR>>You're a good guy Mike. You must have had your coffee by =
>now. I=20
> know where<BR>>you're coming from, your heart. But you can still be =
>a good=20
> person and<BR>>expect users of your creation to pay for your toil =
>and=20
> dedication, unless<BR>>you don't need the money :-) We all =
>appreciate your=20
> efforts and frankly<BR>I'm<BR>>impressed that skunkworks and you =
>are still=20
> busy writing code for the<BR>>platform. I just wish Edmond would =
>wake up=20
> and start writing a new version<BR>>of Paris. That would really =
>help us=20
> out. But Paris still =
>rocks.<BR>><BR>>Rich<BR>><BR>><BR>>"Mike=20
> Audet" <mike@..> wrote in message <A=20
> =
>href=3D"news:47dd2cc4@linux">news:47dd2cc4@linux</A>...<BR>>><BR>&g=
>t;>=20
> Hi Rich,<BR>>><BR>>> I think I just replied to you while =
>replying=20
> to Lamont. I must not have<BR>>> had any coffee yet.=20
> :)<BR>>><BR>>> I'd like to keep the pricing flexible =
>because some=20
> people are truly broke.<BR>>> I want everyone who can use =
>a copy=20
> of these to have them. I just don't<BR>>> want to =
>feel taken=20
> advantage of. Having 50+ copies downloaded with almost<BR>>> no =
>comments=20
> of what people thought of them and very few donations=20
> felt<BR>>kind<BR>>> of shitty. I know people are busy =
>and don't=20
> have time necessarily to<BR>look<BR>>> at things right =
>away. But=20
> I'll be honest, if it weren't for the few<BR>>people<BR>>> =
>who have=20
> been supportive and given me feedback on things, I probably =
>would<BR>>>=20
> have stopped posting these.<BR>>><BR>>> I did some =
>comparisons=20
> between the simalog JCM900 VST plugin, and =
>I<BR>>actually<BR>>>=20
> prefer the simalog. But, I'll still use this plug at least to =
>have=20
> a<BR>>sound<BR>>> while tracking, and also to add texture by =
>varying=20
> the guitar sounds.<BR>>It's<BR>>> also got a really nice =
>clean sound=20
> now. It is very useful to me.<BR>>><BR>>> All the=20
> best,<BR>>>=20
> =
>Mike<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>&=
>gt;<BR>>>=20
> "Rich Lamanna" <<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:richard.lamanna@verizon.net">richard.lamanna@verizon.net</=
>A>>=20
> wrote:<BR>>> >Mike, I haven't downloaded any of these newer =
>plug-ins.=20
> But I believe<BR>you<BR>>> >should make it a requirement to =
>pay=20
> something for downloading them. Heck<BR>>> why<BR>>> =
>>not even=20
> set a minimum price so that you are rewarded properly for=20
> all<BR>of<BR>>> >your efforts. I seem to remember paying =
>around $50=20
> smackaroos for NoLimit<BR>>> >and it was well worth it. It's =
>just=20
> human nature to want to get something<BR>>> >for nothing, =
>especially=20
> if you set it up that way, but I'll tell you<BR>>> >brother, =
>nothing=20
> is free, except maybe air.<BR>>> ><BR>>> =
>>Rich<BR>>>=20
> ><BR>>> >"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote in message <A=20
> =
>href=3D"news:47dc2fb5$1@linux">news:47dc2fb5$1@linux</A>...<BR>>>=20
> >><BR>>> >> Hi All,<BR>>> >><BR>>> =
>
> >> I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with =
>the=20
> PARIS<BR>>> >plugins.<BR>>> >> 20 People =
>have=20
> donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at =
>least<BR>3<BR>>>=20
> more<BR>>> >> before turning my attention to the=20
> driver.<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> I also hope top =
>start=20
> releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. With<BR>>>=20
> any<BR>>> >> luck, that will be within a =
>month.<BR>>>=20
> >><BR>>> >> I really hope these have meant something =
>to=20
> people. I've had a great<BR>>> time<BR>>> >> =
>working=20
> on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - =
>both<BR>>>=20
> >having<BR>>> >> them and making them.<BR>>>=20
> >><BR>>> >> The Amp was the hardest one yet. took =
>probably=20
> around 75 hours to<BR>>finish,<BR>>> >> and it built on =
>
> countless hours learning about the plugins =
>before.<BR>>It's<BR>>>=20
> >> still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory =
>into=20
> a<BR>>register<BR>>> >> done by the logic unit is 4 =
>times as=20
> loud (2 bits offset) as compared<BR>>> to<BR>>> >> =
>the same=20
> MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug=20
> that<BR>>took<BR>>> >> forever to track =
>down.<BR>>>=20
> >><BR>>> >> Anyway, it just doesn't feel right =
>spending that=20
> kind of time and<BR>>watching<BR>>> >> dozens and =
>dozens of=20
> copies get downloaded when only 6 people =
>cared<BR>>enough<BR>>>=20
> >> to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person =
>doesn't own=20
> PARIS<BR>>> >anymore,<BR>>> >> and another is =
>waiting for=20
> a Mac version. So, of all the people who<BR>>>=20
> >downloaded<BR>>> >> and hopefully used the code, only =
>4 people=20
> gave anything for it.<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> =
>Anyway, the=20
> download links are gone. You can still pay anything=20
> you<BR>>want<BR>>> >> - there are no set prices. =
>But,=20
> access to the code will require<BR>>sending<BR>>> >>=20
> "something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I =
>probably=20
> set<BR>>myself<BR>>> >> up for this. I can be a =
>bit=20
> naive.<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> All the =
>best,<BR>>>=20
> >><BR>>> >> Mike<BR>>> >><BR>>>=20
> >><BR>>> ><BR>>>=20
>><BR>>><BR>><BR>><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
>and=20
>you?<BR><A=20
>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>Thanks for posting, Edna. I look forward to hearing about your experience
with them.
All the best,
Mike
"Edna" <edna@texomaonline.com> wrote:
>Hi Mike,
>I'm sorry, I just haven't had a chance yet to try them out. I appreciate
>your work! Be assured that if I use them, payment will be forthcoming..
>Edna
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote in message news:47dc2fb5$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with the PARIS
>> plugins.
>> 20 People have donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at least 3 more
>> before turning my attention to the driver.
>>
>> I also hope top start releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. With
any
>> luck, that will be within a month.
>>
>> I really hope these have meant something to people. I've had a great
time
>> working on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - both
>> having
>> them and making them.
>>
>> The Amp was the hardest one yet. took probably around 75 hours to finish,
>> and it built on countless hours learning about the plugins before. It's
>> still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory into a register
>> done by the logic unit is 4 times as loud (2 bits offset) as compared
to
>> the same MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug that took
>> forever to track down.
>>
>> Anyway, it just doesn't feel right spending that kind of time and watching
>> dozens and dozens of copies get downloaded when only 6 people cared enough
>> to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person doesn't own PARIS
>> anymore,
>> and another is waiting for a Mac version. So, of all the people who
>> downloaded
>> and hopefully used the code, only 4 people gave anything for it.
>>
>> Anyway, the download links are gone. You can still pay anything you want
>> - there are no set prices. But, access to the code will require sending
>> "something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably set myself
>> up for this. I can be a bit naive.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>
>I have an i88x and it sounds really nice.
LaMont wrote:
> I think your points Are on Point! :)
>
> As for the sound of Yammy's converters, well let me just say this.. LAst
> year , a friend did a project on his then New Yammy DW 1600 portable digital
> 16 track recorder. Well, to the point, when we flew those tracks he recorded
> into Nuendo to mix, I was shocked. He used nothing but the 8 on board Pre's.
> To be honest, we could have mixed the songs on the unit. It was that good.
> Very wide , opn, big sound.
>
> Another example of Yammys converters can be heard on the AW4416. Whew!! Turns
> out that Yammy used their 0296 mixers technogoly and converters & pres..
> The Newer Aw2400 uses the DM-2000 Pres and convererters.. Heck! Have you
> every heard the Motif ES/XS Workstations Sampling section?? The 01x? , the
> I88x(Very in demand).. All these units have the same stellar converters..
> That to me.. Are some of the best on the Market. Even sweeter sounding than
> RME.. They are that good..
>
> So, you're not losing in the sound department, heck, you'd be gaining..
> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>> Heheh!!!!! OK I won't read that one.
>> ;o)
>> I think TC makes some kind of interface with monitoring and FX too don't
>
>> they?
>>
>> If Steinberg would lose the preamps (and the probable hefty charge for
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu May 07 10:50:02 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.32351 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
