|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: CD won't eject from car stereo [message #69346 is a reply to message #69345] |
Thu, 15 June 2006 11:41   |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
e way thru. He would delete the last take if it
wasn't good. Every once in a while he would punch in and out, but I didn't
like his choices of punch points.
He let it go way to long before punching out. Those were my biggest gripes.
He was running PT and I was like " come on dude you can save those takes
and pull the best passage from each" in my head. Perhaps he isn't that experienced
or just didn't feel like piecing together somebody's shit. Like I said he
is a cool guy. I think he was just milking them a little too much when he
could gave a little help.
b
rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>i'll be triple checking all the connections but the other inserts that
>short out the noise are not connected or touching. it's just kinda
>weird that this should happen after 9 years.
>
>On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 12:23:16 -0500, "Aaron Allen"
><nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>
>>so it's back
>>> to the dummy cable insert into a non functioning patchpoint and the
>>> noise is gone.
>>
>>sounds awfully ground related man.
>>AA
>>
>>"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:68p8d21bhdl6dopvcqpe10u36pia2tql3i@4ax.com...
>>> work arounds is the operative word. for no reason that i have been
>>> able to suss out 2 channels started getting noise. checked all the
>>> wires and connections...nothing. routed the patch cables to other
>>> channels and noise followed the changes. then i plugged a patch cable
>>> into the patchpoint below the channel insert (not wired to anything
>>> and not touching the insert above and the noise disappeared. pull the
>>> whole thing apart again and check for bad connections or touching
>>> between 2 points and none exists. i even slid a piece of non
>>> conductive material between the connections and nothing. so it's back
>>> to the dummy cable insert into a non functioning patchpoint and the
>>> noise is gone.
>>>
>>> On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:44:12 -0600, "DJ"
>>> <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>That what my place is starting to resemble. I've got a few things here
>>>>that
>>>>need to be serviced bad, but either they are dual channel and one channel
>>>>is
>>>>still working and I'm using it or there's something else that isn't
>>>>functioning quite properly and I need to go crawl around in the snake
pit
>>>>and identify whether it's a cabling issue, hardware issue, patchbay
>>>>issue......etc. I have dedicated all day tomorrow to doing this and
>>>>unracking a Focusrite RED7 and a Demeter comp for shipment out to have
>>>>some
>>>>more in depth maintenance done. I'm going to have to work around the
>>>>Demeter
>>>>in a mix I'm doing, but I've figuired one out. Those UAD-1 comps can
sub
>>>>in
>>>>for hardware with no problem. That's why I've got 4 cards I guess.
>>>>
>>>>;o)
>>>>
>>>>"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
>>>>news:44d3e42e$1@linux...
>>>>> Welcome to the "real" world Brandon.
>>>>> Most real world studios are nowhere as pristine as most of the
>>>>> "project/home" studios out there, simply because there is not enough
>>>>> time
>>>>to
>>>>> maintain equipment...you just quickly find a work-around and get on
with
>>>>it,
>>>>> then that work-around becomes the norm, and so on.....
>>>>> --
>>>>> Martin Harrington
>>>>> www.lendanear-sound.com
>>>>>
>>>>> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:44d33a89$1@linux...
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I got the opportunity to go to a local studio that is pretty well
>>>>> > known.
>>>>> > Some big acts are associated with this place and I was expecting
quite
>>>>> > a
>>>>> > show.
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: CD won't eject from car stereo [message #69347 is a reply to message #69346] |
Thu, 15 June 2006 11:39 |
Rich[3]
Messages: 132
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;>>>> > I expected something fancy, but it was just the opposite.
>>>>> > It was very small, cluttered and disorganized.
>>>>> > They had a lot of noisy channels on there board that they had to
keep
>>>>> > rerouting
>>>>> > because it was screwing up the takes.
>>>>> > Luckily the takes that got screwed were just for scratch instruments.
>>>>> > There
>>>>> > didn't seem to be any concern for the "sound" or "tone". It was just
>>>>> > set
>>>>> > the levels and go. The band were friends of mine and I was there
to
>>>>> > observe.
>>>>> > I was also acting as the guitar tech. I kept my mouth shut and just
>>>>> > watched
>>>>> > never revealing that I was really there to see if I could learn
>>>>something.
>>>>> > The band is a latin band and consists of two acoustic/electric
>>>>> > guitars,
>>>>> > electric
>>>>> > bass, hand percussion and vocals. They mic'd the congas etc.. with
>>>>> > seinhiser
>>>>> > spots and two KM64's for OH's. They sounded good. He was compressing
>>>>them
>>>>> > to track I think. I don't know what type of comp he was using though.
>>>>They
>>>>> > were recording to ProTools system. All in all I was not impressed
with
>>>>> > what
>>>>> > I heard or saw. We will see what tonite brings. I don't think I was
>>>>> > disappointed
>>>>> > in the sound because of Protools I think it was the lack of effort
>>>>> > spent
>>>>> > upfront getting the right sound. Ofcourse they do this every day
and I
>>>>> > hardly
>>>>> > do it at all so what do I know. Anyway..... We tracked the hand
>>>>percussion
>>>>> > last night and are going to do the bass and guitars tonite. They
were
>>>>> > recording
>>>>> > without a click. So it should be interesting to see them try to play
>>>>along
>>>>> > with a rollercoaster of congas. Ok later...
>>>>> > b
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>But DJ, just think about running a dual dual Intel with UAD-1s and Powercore
>cards with more than one motherboard to choose from...and no compatibility
>quirks to keep you up all hours trying to resolve.
>
>As for Macs running Windows - why would anyone pay more money for
>Apple-built hardware to run Windows?
>
>It finally comes out - Macs really just wanted to be PCs. And now they
are.
>And now there will be no more reason to pay Apple more for the same hardware
>you can get from 100 other vendors. Oh, and Mac users will just love having
>to succumb to antivirus/spam protection now.
Yeah, that's what every Mac user wants, to deal with that debacle! This
is one Mac user that won't be loading Windoz virus on my Mac.
>
>On 8/6/06 9:02 PM, in article 44d6ada9@linux, "DJ"
><animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>
>> Hehehe.....yeah......I guess I'll just have to build me one of those crappy
>> old double CPU dual core Opterons and wail and gnash my teeth whil'st
>> running native apps at 64k buffers 27/7
>>
>> ;o)
>>
>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:44d6a887$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Strange,
>>> I just got back form Comp USA to test out a Dual core Imac(20inch) with
>> dual
>>> boot 9Wiin /OSX, and I'm very impressed with the Windows XP performance.
>>>
>>>
>>> Simply put, the Macs run Windows better than some PCs out on the market.
>>> Very impressed.
>>>
>>> As for AMD. Wow!! My last new system I assembled (April 06) was a Dual
>> core
>>> Opteron/939 chipset. It did not run Paris, but, it's abest for ProTools
>> (7.1)
>>> and Nuendo.
>>>
>>> It lloking like Intel is about to recliam the speed game. I really don;t
>>> knwo how AMD let Intel back into the game ??? Since the Opteron was so
>> much
>>> ahead of Intels offerings.
>>>
>>> Well, the ood new for me and others is the Higher speed Opterons price
>> will
>>> continue to fall!! That means setting up a a fast DAW for recoridng,
>> VSti's
>>> will alot lighter in the wallet$$$. I'll continue down the AMD path w
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
