Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » DJ: Check out this VST Host App..Could help you
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: LAMONT-a question [message #73947 is a reply to message #73939] |
Thu, 12 October 2006 23:52   |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
unpatriotic.
We will never tell you that your opinion doesn't count.
We will never waste your lives for power.
We will hold our leaders to a high ethical standard and when they succumb to
lust for power, WE WILL HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE.
If we forget this, please, please, please, remind us.
We need you to do this. You are America as much as we are.
Let's go.Meet the new boss, Same as the old boss.
"j-cron" <jcron@hydrorecords.com> wrote:
> Dear dismayed conservatives:
>
> I hereby make these promises to you.
>
> We will protect your lives and livelihoods.
>
> We will listen to and respect your beliefs.
>
> We will never try to force you to change your religion, sexual
>orientation, or first language.
>
> We will do our best to reduce the number of abortions in our country.
>
> We will have no tolerance for corruption and cronyism, even in our
own
>party.
>
>
>ESPECIALLY in our own party.
>
>We will never tell y
|
|
|
|
| Re: MUHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [message #73949 is a reply to message #73942] |
Fri, 13 October 2006 02:52 |
rick
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
DAY: "WOW THIS THING IS FUCKING GREAT!"
followed by: SUNDAY: "OK, IT SUCKS, I SHITCANNED IT!", my
assessments will be a little more cautious.
:DBy the way, that was tung and cheek, back to Rick!
"j-cron" <jcron@hydrorecords.com> wrote:
>oh lord...
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:455243fc$1@linux...
>>
>> I got the joke, rick. If they did use Macs, they wouldn't crash and they
>> would be harder to hack, but of corse, not impossible.
>>
>> James
>>
>> rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>t'was a joke...
>>>
>>>On 9 Nov 2006 03:24:24 +1000, "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Has nothing to do with Macs.
>>>>
>>>>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>those damn macs. just when you think they've got them
>>>>>working...this...sigh
>>>>>
>>>>>luckily they can still be hand counted.
>>>>>
>>>>>On 8 Nov 2006 06:33:41 +1000, "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Technology sucks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I just voted, well I think I voted??? The scantron style voting
>>>>>>machine
>>>>>>stopped working at 1:30. We had to stuff our ballots in a slot on
the
>>>>side
>>>>>>of the machine. The women that were working there didn't really know
>> what
>>>>>>to do. A women was on a cell phone trying to get help, and the person
>>>>on
>>>>>>the other side on the line kept telling her to keep trying to put
>>>>>>ballots
>>>>>>in the machine. The machine was spitting them out and saying that
it
>> was
>>>>>>a possible folded ballot and to try again. They tried about 30
>>>>>>ballots,
>>>>>>and all they would get was errors. It was odd that the machine stopped
>>>>right
>>>>>>at 1:30. There has to be a better way.
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>I'm not a Republican, but I'll be ecstatic if that what you say holds true
Justin. You'll have to forgive me if don't have much hope anything will
change though. Check back with me in 2008 and we'll see how them Dems did.
(ecstatic, boy dat's a pritty big word. I don't know whether I'm ecstatic,
or ludicrous!) ;>)
Tony
"j-cron" <jcron@hydrorecords.com> wrote in message news:45524f64$1@linux...
> Dear dismayed conservatives:
>
> I hereby make these promises to you.
>
> We will protect your lives and livelihoods.
>
> We will listen to and respect your beliefs.
>
> We will never try to force you to change your religion, sexual
> orientation, or first language.
>
> We will do our best to reduce the number of abortions in our country.
>
> We will have no tolerance for corruption and cronyism, even in our
> own party.
>
>
> ESPECIALLY in our own party.
>
> We will never tell you that you are unpatriotic.
>
> We will never tell you that your opinion doesn't count.
>
> We will never waste your lives for power.
>
> We will hold our leaders to a high ethical standard and when they succumb
> to lust for power, WE WILL HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE.
>
> If we forget this, please, please, please, remind us.
>
> We need you to do this. You are America as much as we are.
> Let's go.
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0062_01C7035D.A15CE4D0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Neil,
I did the same. Got a new Scope Pro card for my 'to be built' comp
tomorrow. =20
It's a brave new world!
Tom
"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:455256b4$Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: MUHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [message #73954 is a reply to message #73937] |
Fri, 13 October 2006 06:53 |
LaMont
Messages: 828
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
$$.
>
>AA
>
>"zmora" <docent191@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>Opinion about bad technical quality of Behringer is myth.I have Ultradyne
>>Pro many years without any troubles.Also I had few other Beringers like
>Ultrafex,
>>Composer, Ultramach and others now I dont't remember them all.But anyway,
>>they never destroyed, I sold them in exelent condition.I heard from other
>>peoples bad opinion about quality of made, I dont't accept.Other story
is
>>sound quality, it is allways subjective and in my opinion much of Behringer
>>pieces are good or enought good for use, particulary for low price vs.
to
>>other company.I don't know new reverbs why I asked on this forum.Old Virtualizer
>>1000P dont't satisfied my ears, but few person good talk about V-Verb 2496
>>and new Virtualizer DSP 2024P, this last one cost about 130 Eur only.
>>
>>zmora
>>
>>
>>
>>"alex plasko" <alex.plasko@snet.net> wrote:
>>>I have/had a few behringer pieces ,and they all worked great. never had
>>any
>>>trouble. I had an edison, an ultracurve pro, and i recently grabbed an
>
>>>ultracoustic guitar amp.
>>>"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
>>>news:45512e45@linux...
>>>>I had a behr verb, it shot craps days outside of it's warranty. I wasn't
>>
>>>>that impressed with it to begin with, so I didn't even put up a fight,
>>
>>>>rather it made for a nice doorstop. Don't remember the model ( you can
>>see
>>>>what a great impression it made here, heh. )
>>>> I have owned some pretty decent Behr stuff, but the verb was far from
>>that
>>>> list. YMMV.
>>>>
>>>> AA
>>>>
>>>> "Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:4550fa98$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> "zmora" <docent191@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Any opinion about Behringer V-Verb Pro 9024 and Virtualizer DSP
>>>>>>2024p?Apart
>>>>>>this, V-Verb Pro not for official sale in EU, only private auction
on
>>
>>>>>>Ebay.
>>>>>
>>>>> If it comes with it's own fire extinguisher, it might be OK...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...unless the fire extinguisher is a Beheringer model, too.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>I think I've just found the location I want to die in. Holy crap that's a
nice place.
-scott v.
"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in news:454bf979$1@linux:
> http://www.sonicranch.com/sta4tracktoproom.html
> NeilThis is a multi-part message
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: MUHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [message #73970 is a reply to message #73942] |
Fri, 13 October 2006 09:42 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;
>> :D
>
>Yeah but we like sound bites and these are good ones ! Plus blue is a
purty color.
no wrote:
> So why didn't they say they would get along before the 7th? Why haven't they
> done this for the last 40+ years? Why have they been so divisive?
>
> When Abramoff got busted they all got in line and gave money back, but yet
> they pointed at the Republicans and screamed "Scandal". So typical! "Look
> at them, they're dirtier than us". When it comes to our interest, both parties
> are the same. The truth is they are both a bunch of dirty greasy slimy rats.
> They are eating our lunch, they sell us out by the second.
>
> They weaken us by them both pointing at each other and saying "look at how
> dirty those bastards are" They keep us divided on the issues, and they stay
> in power! They get fat and rich, while the middle class dies. That's how
> the two party system works, they keep us divided and weak, they stay in power,
> and we lose!
>
> People we need more than a two party system. We need to take back our government.
> We need a government for the people and by the people. We do need change,
> but the answer is not the Democrats! We need to get rid of all the fat bloated
> lying lawyer career politicians! WE need to get rid of ALL the lobby groups.
> WE need a new justice system. We need a new tax system, We need a complete
> over haul of the government, it is way too corrupt! Easy to do? NO! Necessary
> to do yes! Will it happen? Only if you and I decide to come together, be
> honest, and do it together. We'd have to put our issues aside for ever.
> That means we have to stop looking back and playing the blame game! The
> entitlement mentality is going to break and kill this country.
>
> The powers that be, (Politicians, world banks, etc.) are shifting the wealth
> of The United States (WE the People) to third world countries. They are
> selling America off wholesale, right under our noses. They want to rule
> the world economically. THE NEW WORLD ORDER! WE better wake up fast.
>
>
> The other issue facing the US is China. If we are not careful we will have
> Chinese boots on American soil in the next 30 years. Make no mistake, they
> are planning on it, just do some research on it. They plan to take over
> the world.
>
> The first step is to see the truth. The second is to stop listening to the
> politicians and the media. The third is to be honest and come together.
> The forth is to take massive action. That means you!
>
> We need change. I hope the Democrats make the right changes, and get the
> country going in the right direction. Unfortunately I believe they will
> try to destroy and damage the Republican party, with more scandals and criminal
> prosecutions so they can stay in power for years and years to come. This
> will not help the country. They need to focus on getting us back on track,
> but they are already talking war with the republicans. That's just dirty
> politics as usual, not what we need. Lip service is nice, I want to see
> action. Also prepare for tax increases, they need to buy votes for 2008
> with your money.
>
> I hope I'm wrong. I hope this is a new start. We'll see.
>
> political post should be in the general news group section!!!
>
>
>
>
> "j-cron" <jcron@hydrorecords.com> wrote:
>> Dear dismayed conservatives:
>>
>> I hereby make these promises to you.
>>
>> We will protect your lives and livelihoods.
>>
>> We will listen to and respect your beliefs.
>>
>> We will never try to force you to change your religion, sexual
>> orientation, or first language.
>>
>> We will do our best to reduce the number of abortions in our country.
>>
>> We will have no tolerance for corruption and cronyism, even in our
> own
>> party.
>>
>>
>> ESPECIALLY in our own party.
>>
>> We will never tell you that you are unpatriotic.
>>
>> We will never tell you that your opinion doesn't count.
>>
>> We will never waste your lives for power.
>>
>> We will hold our leaders to a high ethical standard and when they succumb
> to
>> lust for power, WE WILL HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE.
>>
>> If we forget this, please, please, please, remind us.
>>
>> We need you to do this. You are America as much as we are.
>> Let's go.
>>
>>
>"DJ" <no@way.jack> wrote in message news:45527532$1@linux...
> 3. Since the republic
|
|
|
|
| OK....developers license in hand...here goes...... [message #73992 is a reply to message #73924] |
Fri, 13 October 2006 11:58 |
animix
Messages: 356
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ball on this and if it is not
>>effective,
>
>>the responsibility will fall in their lap.
>>
>
> This is from an article in the New Yorker that is about a year and a half
> old. The numbers are much worse now.
> Are you really happy that our economy is artificially propped up with
> trillions
> of dollars borrowed from countries like China? It's bad enough that we
> have
> placed ourselves in the position that we need a constant flow of mideast
> oil to keep our economy going. Very few Americans understand the danger of
> working under the threat of petrodollar conversion. (
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar).
> But. To also be so far in debt to China that they have REAL influence on
> our policies is unconscionable. This is the hidden economy of the Bush
> years.
> Funny but it has been very good for The Carlyle Group and Halliburton.
>
>
> "Last year, Asian countries invested almost four hundred billion dollars
> in the United States, mostly in government bonds. China is effectively
> taking
> most of its excess national savings and lending it to the United States.
> The Japanese, who despite their creaking economy remain flush with
> savings,
> bought a quarter trillion dollars of American debt last year, even though
> the interest is lousy and the assets themselves are losing value. More
> than
> any other nation in history, the United States depends, economically, on
> the kindness of strangers."
>
> http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/050418ta_talk _surowiecki
>
> Gene
>"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>"DJ" <no@way.jack> wrote:
>>
>>3. Since the republicans have rebuilt the economy that Clinton destroyed,
>
>>and it usually takes the democrats at least 4 years to wreck a good economy,
>
>>the border control issue is going to be their biggest domestic challenge.
>
>>They are going to have to carry the ball on this and if it is not effective,
>
>>the responsibility will fall in their lap.
>>
>
>This is from an article in the New Yorker that is about a year and a half
>old. The numbers are much worse now.
>Are you really happy that our economy is artificially propped up with trillions
>of dollars borrowed from countries like China? It's bad enough that we have
>placed ourselves in the position that we need a constant flow of mideast
>oil to keep our economy going. Very few Americans understand the danger
of
>working under the threat of petrodollar conversion. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar).
> But… To also be so far in debt to China that they have REAL influence on
>our policies is unconscionabl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK....developers license in hand...here goes...... [message #73998 is a reply to message #73992] |
Fri, 13 October 2006 12:26 |
Larry Upton
Messages: 30
Registered: October 2006
|
Member |
|
|
ept
>>> out in the 90's and they will be tossed out on their respective arsses in
>>> two years rather than 4 years (as would happen if they won the presidency
>>> in 2008). This may be the best of two evils as far as conservatives are
>>> concerned.
>>>
>>> I'll hold my breath for a little while and give them the benefit of the
>>> doubt. They haven't had one constructive (realistic) idea as of yet but
>>> they keep hinting around that they do. It's now time to see if it's all
>>> hat, no cowboy and it seems that now, when they are questioned about what
>>> they're gonna do, they can't scoot backwards on their asses fast enough
>>> now that they will be expected to come up with *the plan* that they never
>>> had.
>>> ;o)
>>>
>>> "j-cron" <jcron@hydrorecords.com> wrote in message
>>> news:45524f64$1@linux...
>>>> Dear dismayed conservatives:
>>>>
>>>> I hereby make these promises to you.
>>>>
>>>> We will protect your lives and livelihoods.
>>>>
>>>> We will listen to and respect your beliefs.
>>>>
>>>> We will never try to force you to change your religion, sexual
>>>> orientation, or first language.
>>>>
>>>> We will do our best to reduce the number of abortions in our
>>>> country.
>>>>
>>>> We will have no tolerance for corruption and cronyism, even in our
>>>> own party.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ESPECIALLY in our own party.
>>>>
>>>> We will never tell you that you are unpatriotic.
>>>>
>>>> We will never tell you that your opinion doesn't count.
>>>>
>>>> We will never waste your lives for power.
>>>>
>>>> We will hold our leaders to a high ethical standard and when they
>>>> succumb to lust for power, WE WILL HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE.
>>>>
>>>> If we forget this, please, please, please, remind us.
>>>>
>>>> We need you to do this. You are America as much as we are.
>>>> Let's go.
>>>>
>DJ wrote:
> Are you really happy that our economy is artificially propped up with
> trillions
> of dollars borrowed from countries like China?
>
> Absolutely not....and who praytell, gave China the jumpstart that vaulted
> them into the position they are in nowadays?
Nixon.
>> It's bad enough that we have placed ourselves in the position that we need
>> a constant flow of mideast
> oil to keep our economy going.<
>
> I agree. A president with some foresight would have recognized this back
> when we had the time to di something about it,
Carter did, but we voted him out and effectively pretended there was no
problem with our oil dependency for the next 22 years (Reagan, Bush1,
Clinton, Bush2).
Gore probably would have tried to do something.
> especially upon having had
> ward publicly declared on this country by Al Qaeda. So what are we going to
> do? Are the Democrats going to solve this? In order to do so, we need to
> become energy independent *as in..yesterday*. Now how to go about that when
> all domestic energy options other than drilling for oil in old,
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK....developers license in hand...1st experiment a success. [message #74000 is a reply to message #73998] |
Fri, 13 October 2006 13:58 |
animix
Messages: 356
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
uot; <no@way.jack> wrote:
>>> 3. Since the republicans have rebuilt the economy that Clinton destroyed,
>>> and it usually takes the democrats at least 4 years to wreck a good
>>> economy,
>>> the border control issue is going to be their biggest domestic challenge.
>>> They are going to have to carry the ball on this and if it is not
>>> effective,
>>> the responsibility will fall in their lap.
>>>
>> This is from an article in the New Yorker that is about a year and a half
>> old. The numbers are much worse now.
>> Are you really happy that our economy is artificially propped up with
>> trillions
>> of dollars borrowed from countries like China? It's bad enough that we
>> have
>> placed ourselves in the position that we need a constant flow of mideast
>> oil to keep our economy going. Very few Americans understand the danger of
>> working under the threat of petrodollar conversion. (
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar).
>> But. To also be so far in debt to China that they have REAL influence on
>> our policies is unconscionable. This is the hidden economy of the Bush
>> years.
>> Funny but it has been very good for The Carlyle Group and Halliburton.
>>
>>
>> "Last year, Asian countries invested almost four hundred billion dollars
>> in the United States, mostly in government bonds. China is effectively
>> taking
>> most of its excess national savings and lending it to the United States.
>> The Japanese, who despite their creaking economy remain flush with
>> savings,
>> bought a quarter trillion dollars of American debt last year, even though
>> the interest is lousy and the assets themselves are losing value. More
>> than
>> any other nation in history, the United States depends, economically, on
>> the kindness of strangers."
>>
>> http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/050418ta_talk _surowiecki
>>
>> Gene
>>
>
>I have a good mattress, I'll happily store your excess cash and stuff. :^)
Historically, the investment climate has been good and bad under the
leadership of both major parties, so I can probably come up with an
investment strategy better than a mattress no matter who's in power...
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
Neil wrote:
> "DJ" <no@way.jack> wrote:
>> The democrats have taken control of the house (at least right now) with
> no
>> agenda whatsoever.
>>
>> They actually don't have a mandate from the voters to do ANYTHING.
>
> Well, in all fairness to the Dems, they DO have a mandate...
> a mandate for "change", even if that change isn't very
> well-defined at all. So we sell all our stocks & mutual funds,
> stuff our money in a mattress somewhere & watch the economy
> plunge into the shitter, and wait a few years 'til the
> Republicans get back in power on the next cycle of "change",
> and then maybe we can start all over again.
>
> NeilDemocrats have been responsible for some questionable spending
decisions. However Republicans have done little to provide a better
example. Republicans have to take a hard look at their own government
spending because they have managed to break all the records. The deficit
is more than it has ever been. If taxes go up it will be most likely
because of the need to pay the bill due on that.
Taxes are one element of living expenses but not the major piece. For
example, I don't know about your neck o' the woods, but here we're
paying more for gas the day after the election than we did for the few
stable weeks before the election, and not because of taxes or sudden
government policy change.
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
Neil wrote:
> "LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>> P.S.
>> The dem do have an agenda and that is to make Bush's las 2 >years a Lame-Duck
>> living hell
>
> Oh yeah, that's REAL productive. That'll get us EVERYWHERE!
> (not)
>
>> AND stop the use of FEAR (Foxnews) to control the electorate..
>
> How? By using CNN & Chris Matthews to control the electorate?
>
>> More power to them !!
>
> And to their "tax everything that moves & when it stops moving
> tax it's offspring" economic strategy... thanks, LaMont - you
> make me want to go back to earning no more than $10k a year
> again just so I can have all the social welfare advantages that
> I'll now start paying even more for, starting - oh, probably
> tomorrow.
>
> Neilno wrote:
> Look at what they did to Lieberman when he didn't tow the line.
The "they" in that case was the Democratic voters voting in their own
state primary. Local voters have the right to choose their candidate and
Lieberman did not win the primary.
However, Lieberman won as an independent in the election. So overall the
state's voters still chose him over the candidate the state's Democrats
preferred. Lieberman is in a very good position now, as a potential tie
breaker vote in a close Senate.
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
> "DJ" <no@way.jack> wrote:
>> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK....developers license in hand...1st experiment a success. [message #74001 is a reply to message #74000] |
Fri, 13 October 2006 14:04 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
4552a0da@linux...
>>> You sound a bit grumpy, Deej. Interesting version of events and harsh
>
>>> conjecture. When does that benefit of the doubt actually kick in?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>> The democrats have taken control of the house (at least right now) with
> no
>> agenda whatsoever.
>>
>> They actually don't have a mandate from the voters to do ANYTHING. They
>
>> managed to manipulate the voters with a constant drumbeat of hatred against
>
>> Bush and turned that into a win. And now they think don't have to do
>> ANYTHING. They didn't promise to do anything, they offered no solutions,
> no
>> plans, nothing.. just used hatred for bush to get back into power.
>>
>> I find that more than a little scary..but I sure applaud the democrats for
>
>> pulling it off.
>>
>> Reality is that these *conservative* Democrats *owe* the liberal leadership
>
>> already. Pelosi orchestrated this and these freshman congessfolk are in
> the
>> bag....mere window dressing to put a moderate face on. Unless they tow the
>
>> liberal line, they will get nowhere as *career politicians* and will not
> be
>> supported next election by the Dem power structure so the real winners were
>
>> the manipulative leftist power structure. It's diabolically clever. They
>
>> make guys like Carl Rove seem like rank amateurs when they put their minds
>
>> to it.
>>
>> ;o)
>>
>
> Look at what they did to Lieberman when he didn't tow the line.
>>
>>> -Jamie
>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>
>>>
>>> DJ wrote:
>>>> 1. It was sort of interesting to see that the Democratic party won by
>
>>>> running many conservative candidates. It will be even more interesting
> to
>>>> see if they were really conservatives or if they will now show their
> true
>>>> colors and march in lockstep with the left wing power structure.
>>>>
>>>> 2. The democratic leadership will need to actually be expected to show
>
>>>> some leadership instead of just carping about how they don't like what
>
>>>> the republicans are doing. They will be held accountable finally, just
> as
>>>> the republicans have been.
>>>>
>>>> 3. Since the republicans have rebuilt the economy that Clinton destroyed,
>
>>>> and it usually takes the democrats at least 4 years to wreck a good
>>>> economy, the border control issue is going to be their biggest domestic
>
>>>> challenge. They are going to have to carry the ball on this and if it
> is
>>>> not effective, the responsibility will fall in their lap.
>>>>
>>>> Having this party in charge of the House intelligence committee (again)
>
>>>> is a scary thought. Alcee Hastings may be heading the House Intelligence
>
>>>> Committee. He was once a Fed. judge in Florida who was impeached by a
>
>>>> then Democratic (!) Congress in the 80's for leaking secrets about a
> Fed.
>>>> trial involving a big-time drug ring and accepting a $150,000 bribe.
> He
>>>> is one of a very few federal judges ever to be removed from office.
> Is
>>>> Pelosi going to drain the swamp only to repopulate it with *convicted*
>
>>>> vermin?
>>>>
>>>> I think the good thing about this is that they are now going to be in
> a
>>>> "put up or shut up" situation and there is at least the possibility that
>
>>>> they will be called on their whining by the independent voters who put
>
>>>> them over the top.
>>>>
>>>> If they are truly as clueless as they appear to be and if they do things
>
>>>> like appoint Hastings, start wrecking the economy (a la Rangel), try
> for
>>>> a presidential impeachment and cut funding for Iraq, it will be quickly
>
>>>> obvious that they are the same old tired socialist flotsam that we swept
>
>>>> out in the 90's and they will be tossed out on their respective arsses
> in
>>>> two years rather than 4 years (as would happen if they won the presidency
>
>>>> in 2008). This may be the best of two evils as far as conservatives are
>
>>>> concerned.
>>>>
>>>> I'll hold my breath for a little while and give them the benefit of
> the
>>>> doubt. They haven't had one constructive (realistic) idea as of yet but
>
>>>> they keep hinting around that they do. It's now time to see if it's all
>
>>>> hat, no cowboy and it seems that now, when they are questioned about
> what
>>>> they're gonna do, they can't scoot backwards on their asses fast enough
>
>>>> now that they will be expected to come up with *the plan* that they never
>
>>>> had.
>>>> ;o)
>>>>
>>>> "j-cron" <jcron@hydrorecords.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:45524f64$1@linux...
>>>>> Dear dismayed conservatives:
>>>>>
>>>>> I hereby make these promises to you.
>>>>>
>>>>> We will protect your lives and livelihoods.
>>>>>
>>>>> We will listen to and respect your beliefs.
>>>>>
>>>>> We will never try to force you to change your religion, sexual
>
>>>>> orientation, or first language.
>>>>>
>>>>> We will do our best to reduce the number of abortions in our
>>>>> country.
>>>>>
>>>>> We will have no tolerance for corruption and cronyism, even in
> our
>>>>> own party.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ESPECIALLY in our own party.
>>>>>
>>>>> We will never tell you that you are unpatriotic.
>>>>>
>>>&
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK....developers license in hand...1st experiment a success. [message #74003 is a reply to message #74001] |
Fri, 13 October 2006 14:59 |
animix
Messages: 356
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
na the jumpstart that vaulted
>them into the position they are in nowadays?
>
>>It's bad enough that we have placed ourselves in the position that we need
>>a constant flow of mideast
>oil to keep our economy going.<
>
>I agree. A president with some foresight would have recognized this back
>when we had the time to di something about it, especially upon having had
>ward publicly declared on this country by Al Qaeda. So what are we going
to
>do? Are the Democrats going to solve this? In order to do so, we need to
>become energy independent *as in..yesterday*. Now how to go about that when
>all domestic energy options other than drilling for oil in old, depleted
oil
>and gas reservoirs here are off the table whereas solutions that *are
>proven* could bring this about within the next 5 years are off the table?
>
>I'm all for clean energy. enough clean energy to sustain t\our economy is
15
>years away, at least. We don't have 15 years...especially with a party in
>power that is willing to negotiate with terrorists, which to them is a sign
>of weakness. They will be encouraged by this.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>DJ
>
>
>"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message
>news:4553565b$1@linux...
>>
>> "DJ" <no@way.jack> wrote:
>>>
>>>3. Since the republicans have rebuilt the economy that Clinton destroyed,
>>
>>>and it usually takes the democrats at least 4 years to wreck a good
>>>economy,
>>
>>>the border control issue is going to be their biggest domestic challenge.
>>
>>>They are going to have to carry the ball on this and if it is not
>>>effective,
>>
>>>the responsibility will fall in their lap.
>>>
>>
>> This is from an article in the New Yorker that is about a year and a half
>> old. The numbers are much worse now.
>> Are you really happy that our economy is artificially propped up with
>> trillions
>> of dollars borrowed from countries like China? It's bad enough that we
>> have
>> placed ourselves in the position that we need a constant flow of mideast
>> oil to keep our economy going. Very few Americans understand the danger
of
>> working under the threat of petrodollar conversion. (
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar).
>> But. To also be so far in debt to China that they have REAL influence
on
>> our policies is unconscionable. This is the hidden economy of the Bush
>> years.
>> Funny but it has been very good for The Carlyle Group and Halliburton.
>>
>>
>> "Last year, Asian countries invested almost four hundred billion dollars
>> in the United States, mostly in government bonds. China is effectively
>> taking
>> most of its excess national savings and lending it to the United States.
>> The Japanese, who despite their creaking economy remain flush with
>> savings,
>> bought a quarter trillion dollars of American debt last year, even though
>> the interest is lousy and the assets themselves are losing value. More
>> than
>> any other nation in history, the United States depends, economically,
on
>> the kindness of strangers."
>>
>> http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/050418ta_talk _surowiecki
>>
>> Gene
>>
>
>a peruser of the obits i bet. ;o)
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 13:08:19 -0500, "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>And if they aren't to your liking, well, I'll take them off your
>hands...for a nominal service charge of course
>
>heehehehehe
>
>
>
>"Tyrone Corbett" <tyronecorbett@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:4553592c$1@linux...
>>
>> Thanks Neil, I'm very interested in getting your feedback about this
>> card...staying
>> tuned.
>>
>> Tyrone
>>
>> "Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>"Tyrone Corbett" <tyronecorbett@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Are there any on-line demos of the Creamware products...audio, graphics,
>>>etc.?
>>>>I went to the website, but did not notice anything.
>>>>
>>>>Tyrone
>>>
>>>They'll tell you: "Rent the 'Gladiator' DVD" because that
>>>soundtrack was done in Creamware/Pulsar.
>>>
>>>Kewl if you're going to be doing soundtrack stuff, but it's not
>>>going to show you how a metal band or a Jazz trio would sound
>>>through it. I'm just gonna take the risk & give it a shot, and
>>>if it doesn't work out for what I'm looking for I'll give any of
>>>youse guys here first shot at buying it from me... so if any of
>>>you are on the fence & aren't in a big hurry to try it, hang
>>>loose for a short time & if it doens't give me what I want, you
>>>might be able to pick up a reasonable deal (yeah, i'd sell it at
>>>a slight discount off what I paid for it). The guy tells me now
>>>that it should arrive NEXT week - so, not in time for me to
>>>install & evaluate by this weekend, as I had originally hoped.
>>>
>>>My big concern, apart from "is it going to sound killer?" is the
>>>whole i/o situation.
>>>
>>>Neil
>>
>"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:455374c4@linux...
> We also need leadership that won't let the wacky beliefs of a few
> terrorists directly control their course of action (or inaction).
Jamie,
Are you referring to those few wacky terroists who killed over 3,000
innocent people in the World Trade Centers, crashed a jumbo jet into our
Pentagon, and, but for the extreme courage of some passengers, almost flew a
jumbo jet into our White House or Capital Building? Those wacky terroists?
Maybe it's that wacky president over in Iran who wants to "wipe Isreal from
the face of the planet". You know, the one enriching all the uranium. I
disagree with plenty of the Republicans and the Presidents actions,
policies, etc., but being tough with terroists is one area we can't waiver.
These people want to kill us. I'm affraid nothing short of a few smuggled in
soviet nukes going off is going to make this clear to people. Too bad it'll
be too late at that point. Sorry for the drama, but this one thing more than
any other scares me sick.
Tony
> DJ wrote:
>> Are you really happy that our economy is artificially propped up with
>> trillions
>> of dollars borrowed from countries like China?
>>
>> Absolutely not....and who praytell, gave China the jumpstart that vaulted
>> them into the position they are in nowadays?
>
> Nixon.
>
>
>>> It's bad enough that we have placed ourselves in the position that we
>>> need a constant flow of mideast
>> oil to keep our economy going.<
>>
>> I agree. A president with some foresight would have recognized this back
>> when we had the time to di something about it,
>
> Carter did, but we voted him out and effectively pretended there was no
> problem with our oil dependency for the next 22 years (Reagan, Bush1,
> Clinton, Bush2).
>
> Gore probably would have tried to do something.
>
>
>> especially upon having had ward publicly declared on this country by Al
>> Qaeda. So what are we going to do? Are the Democrats going to solve this?
>> In order to do so, we need to become energy independent *as
>> in..yesterday*. Now h
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri May 15 13:30:51 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.15643 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
