| Another solution [message #67565] |
Tue, 02 May 2006 17:04  |
dc[4]
Messages: 62 Registered: September 2005
|
Member |
|
|
03:19:32 +1000, "Rod Lincoln"
<rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>Here's the deal. I've been running Norton Systemworks 2002 on my internet
>comp, renewing the antivirus subscription every year. My subscription ran
>out yesterday and upon trying to renew it, I was informed it was no longer
>supported, and I had to upgrade to whatever 2006. Since I've read some of
>you are down on Norton, I thought I'd ask for opinions on what to switch
>to. Sooooo....what do you guys like?
>
>I don't use the norton firewall. I use the free Zone Alarm one.
>I kind of like the system tune up thing that Norton did. I don't think I've
>had a crash...ever, on this comp.
>RodI promise you if you hear my Ampeg VST preamp you'll say the sansamp sucks
for tone. I think I'm becoming a gear slut!
"justcron" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: Another solution [message #67566 is a reply to message #67565] |
Tue, 02 May 2006 18:20  |
audioguy_editout_
 Messages: 249 Registered: December 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
com" target="_blank">paris@hydrorecords.com> wrote:
>That proves any tool can be worth it.
>
>The SansAmp doesn't suck for tone.. it just needs a little EQ :)
>
>"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
>news:4473d21e$1@linux...
>>
>>
>> I use the Pod a lot. I only have 7 "High end" mic pre's and 3 other
>> channels
>> of "prosumer" so I use them for drums when tracking, and often use the
pod
>> to record a scratch. Then replace it. I hear the Brick is cool. I may
need
>> to try one
>>
>>
>> "justcron" <paris@hydrorecords.com> wrote:
>>>No I hear ya John... I like a bunch of the different ones, I just dont
>>
>>>personally think the sansamp 'sucks' but I respect your opinion. the
>>>only
>>
>>>one that I've found that really does suck is the POD, but then some people
>>
>>>like that too.
>>>
>>>"john" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|