| Paris Hardware Wierdness [message #89890] |
Sat, 15 September 2007 20:23  |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>> <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Dedric, I concur on your points. I have a question to you and many
others.
>>>
>>> Why is so important to have zero latency or a native based rig? When,
just
>>> adding a mixer for monitoring will take care of it. Now, you have zero
>>> latency/
>>> with fx (via verb fx) when tracking.
>>>
>>> yes, Asio is nice, but it seems that folks are hell bent on cracking
.003
>>> ms latency at 88.2/96k sampling rates or even 192.
>>>
>>> Even with the fastest computers, they all struggle to get to utopia zero
>>> latency.. Jsut add any mixer and the problem is solved..
>>>
>>> BTW: Those Apogee symphony test are real world numbers. You gotta admit,
>>> thosse ms nuembers are impressive..
>>>
>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Paris Hardware Wierdness [message #89905 is a reply to message #89900] |
Sun, 16 September 2007 13:57  |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;c:\windows\system32\Ensoniq\plugins\” to the end of it (without the
quotation marks). Make sure you have the semi colon between the new
entry and what was there before
..
I've got this from Mike and it helped me.
Erling
On 21 Oct 2007 05:19:05 +1000, "mikep" <mikep@hometownrecords.com>
wrote:
>
>Paris 3.0
>
>
>"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>what version of paris are you using?
>>
>>AA
>>
>>"MikeP" <mikep@hometownrecords.com> wrote in message
>>news:47191210$1@linux...
>>>
>>> I searched this, but found no answers.
>>>
>
>
>>> How can I get the comp to work in xp?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mike
>>
>>Someday I may want to understand what you're talking about, but for now I'm
happy to assume that you know. :)
S
"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote in message
news:471a94cb@linux...
> ....and decide to go down the native path using higher sample rates in the
> same way I have de3cided to do, I've got the new DAW(s) in a pretty
> bulletproof configuration now with the ability to interface lots of
> external boxes (which I would prefer to do, even at lower sample rates).
>
> I had recently purchased a Lucid GenX-96 hoping to use it as a master
> clock but I get the Lucid GenX-96 in here and try to slave the MADI card
> to it and the MADI card won't slave to it at sample rates above 48KHz. Not
> the end of the world, but downright baffling.
>
> What "is" working (and what I'm going to stick with) is to output the MADI
> WC to a Mytek Stereo96 AD converter, then take the BNC output of the Mytek
> and input this to the Lucid GenX 96 while simultaneously taking the AES
> output of the Mytek and patching it into the AES input of my other Lucid
> GenX-6 box. Set both Lucid boxes to distro mode with the respective proper
> incoming sync formats from the Mytek and use the BNC outs (a total of 12
> available) of the Lucid boxes to the following devices which are either
> internally terminated or terminated with 75 ohm BNC caps:
>
&
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
