The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Happy New Year!......8 core Mac Pro
Happy New Year!......8 core Mac Pro [message #94474] Tue, 08 January 2008 08:17 Go to next message
Nappy is currently offline  Nappy
Messages: 198
Registered: September 2006
Senior Member
using them with Paris. I'm in the process of getting some
new video cards after my Radeon cards started giving me trouble. I'm looking
for a 2-card configuration (one PCI and o
Re: Happy New Year!......8 core Mac Pro [message #94475 is a reply to message #94474] Tue, 08 January 2008 08:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TCB is currently offline  TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
Senior Member
ne AGP) for four displays. I'm using
an ASUS A7S333 mobo. Deej seemed to have good experience with them, but it's
been a while. They are available is 128mb and 256mb versions. Which one should
be best? Any info would be greatly appreciated!

LuizPlease don't read my post where I said this is a firewire interface.
Nothing different going on here from any other fw interface.


On 3/
Re: Happy New Year!......8 core Mac Pro [message #94476 is a reply to message #94474] Tue, 08 January 2008 09:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jamie K is currently offline  Jamie K   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
16/08 11:50 AM, in article 47dd6112@linux, "Mr. Simplicity"
<noway@jose.net> wrote:

> Here's a link where you han check out a closeup of the ports:
>
> http://messe.harmony-central.com/Musikmesse08/Content/Steinb erg/PR/MR816-FireW
> ire-Interfaces.html
>
> Also, I'm listening to the video clip again adn he specifically states that
> it connects to the computer via firewire.
>
>
> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:47dd5efc@linux...
>> Yea
Re: Happy New Year!......8 core Mac Pro [message #94479 is a reply to message #94476] Tue, 08 January 2008 10:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dedric Terry is currently offline  Dedric Terry   UNITED STATES
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
Senior Member

>>>>
>>>> Yes of course latency is *effectively* "zero" for the builtin dsp (in
>>>> and
>>>> out of the onboard mixer), but not in and out of the native system.
>>>> Nothing
>>>> different from what Totalmix, Cuemix, Soundscape and TDM do, and while
>>>> it
>>>> may be a few nanoseconds faster than others, it's still not *really*
>>>> 0.00000ns.
>>>
>>> That's not what I took away from what he was saying. Check out the video
>>> again when you get time dude, I think you may have missed the whole
>>> reason why I'd choose this system if I dumped Paris. What I didn't hear
>>> though was if I could stack these units, but I'm guessing not because of
>>> how fast they simply would have to be to be no latency units.
>>>
>>>> Of course we all know absolute zero is impossible without time travel
>>>> ;-)
>>>> There is always at least a few nanoseconds for gate setup/hold times in
>>>> the
>>>> converters, and in the dsp chips, etc, so regardless of "zero" or "near
>>>> zero" latency claims, they are all lower than most people care about
>>>> since
>>>> it's hardware based routing, rather than latent software routing (which
>>>> actually could be nearly as fast if the OS were optimized for it - i.e.
>>>> systems like Radar, etc).
>>>
>>> very true, and what I wanted to hear about. Actual convertor to convertor
>>> latency cannot possibly be zero/none. Even Paris is hitting 1.5 mS
Re: Happy New Year!......8 core Mac Pro [message #94481 is a reply to message #94479] Tue, 08 January 2008 11:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TCB is currently offline  TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
Senior Member
terry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/15/08 10:50 PM, in article 47dcaa29@linux, "Aaron Allen"
>>>>>> <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>>>>> semi-pro/pro work because of the latency they can't seem to lick.

>>>>>>> Steiny
>>>>>>> apparantly has beat that now with the Yammy interface.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> How so? Was there mention of lower latencies I didn't see?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a firewire interface just like the Fireface, Firepod, etc, and

>>>>>> firewire
>>>>>> is inherently limited due to the extra buffering overhead. I can't

>>>>>> see
>>>>> the
>>>>>> new Steinberg interface running at any lower latency than the
>>>>>> Fireface,
>>>>> but
>>>>>> if they've beat that limit, kudos to Yamaha.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So far, imho RME seems to lead the low latency race overall with ASIO
>>>>>> drivers. Imho, until operating systems drop the consumer bloat war

>>>>>> and
>>>>> get
>>>>>> down to really running lean and mean with true kernel level audio

>>>>>> drivers
>>>>>> (not the facade of core audio), we may never see lower than 32
>>>>>> samples,
>>>>>> unless Intel multiplies the number of cores and general buss/memory
>>>>>> processing exponentially to outpace the growing OS demands.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still have to wonder what got us to the point that an OS had to do

>>>>>> anything
>>>>>> more than boot and access the hardware.... but we've had that
>>>>>> discussion
>>>>> a
>>>>>> few times already. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dedric
>>>>>>
>>>
>Heheh!!!!! OK I won't read that one.
;o)
I think TC makes some kind of interface with monitoring and FX too don't
they?

If Steinberg would lose th
Re: Happy New Year!......8 core Mac Pro [message #94482 is a reply to message #94481] Tue, 08 January 2008 10:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jamie K is currently offline  Jamie K   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
e preamps (and the probable hefty charge for
them), this interface might be a bit more attractive.

Also, I wondering about something. I can enable the functionality of both
the Frontier Tranzport and my Houston controller simultaneously. Now if the
Houston could be simultaneously be used for multiple fader moves and the the
new single fader Steiny controller could also be used for accessing a single
fader and the channel strip controls, this might end up being a nice
combination of functionalities.

Three of these new interfaces (sans preamps) along with an RME ADI 192-DD
and an RME ADI 8-DD would give me 24 analog I/O and allow me to integrate my
outboard gear in a way similar to the way I'm doing now with a Multiface,
MADI/ADI 648, AES32 and a Pair of ADI 8-DD units.

Basically I would be selling off the MADI/ADI-648, the Multiface, a pair of
ADI 8-DS units (Nuendo branded) and one of my ADI 8-DD units and replacing
them with 3 x of the Steiny 816 units and the CC121 controler and an RME ADI
192-DD. the reason for the ADI 192-DD is because it will allow the sample
rate conversion of signals received via ADAT I/O whereas the ADI8-DD will
not.

What would be the advantage of this?? Well, I could use the Steinberg
control room function without needing to drastically upgrade my current
computer to use the CR function with low latency with large
projects.........and this would allow me to sell the huge Furman HDS-16
system along with the 5 x HRM-16 remote mixers I'm using.

I *might* come out of this on a break even or even with some money in my
pocket depending on the cost of the Steinberg hardware. Of course, there's
also the factor of my liking the RME converters I'd be selling and I don't
really know diddly about Yamaha converters. thad and I seem to be on the
same wavelength most of the time and I have to take into account his opinion
of Yamaha converters.

Well........anyway......this is probably a few months away from being a
possibility anyway.

Deej




"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
news:C402CDC9.1326E%dterry@keyofd.net...
> Please don't read my post where I said this is a firewire interface.
> Nothing different going on here from any other fw interface.
>
>
> On 3/16/08 11:50 AM, in article 47dd6112@linux, "Mr. Simplicity"
> <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>
>> Here's a link where you han check out a closeup of the ports:
>>
>> http://messe.harmony-central.com/Musikmesse08/Content/Steinb erg/PR/MR816-FireW
>> ire-Interfaces.html
>>
>> Also, I'm listening to the video clip again adn he specifically states
>> that
>> it connects to the computer via firewire.
>>
>>
>> "Bill L" &l
Re: Happy New Year!......8 core Mac Pro [message #94485 is a reply to message #94481] Tue, 08 January 2008 11:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dedric Terry is currently offline  Dedric Terry   UNITED STATES
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
Senior Member
>> good. Since i have used Cubase from the early Atari version in '88 or '89,
>> I am a pretty big fan of Steiny too.
>>
>> BTW he did say you could cascade 3 units, and he said they are USB, not
>> firewire.
>>
>> Aaron Allen wrote:
>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>>> news:C40220B7.131DC%dterry@keyofd.net...
>>>> I only watched part due to time constraints so I didn't catch that (i.e.
>>>> I
>>>> could tell early on there was nothing new here).
>>>>
>>>> Yes of course latency is *effectively* "zero" for the builtin dsp (in
>>>> and
>>>> out of the onboard mixer), but not in and out of the native system.
>>>> Nothing
>>>> different from what Totalmix, Cuemix, Soundscape and TDM do, and while
>>>> it
>>>> may be a few nanoseconds faster than others, it's still not *really*
>>>> 0.00000ns.
>>> That's not what I took away from what he was saying. Check out the video
>>> again when you get time dude, I think you may have missed the whole
>>> reason why I'd choose this system if I dumped Paris. What I didn't hear
>>> though was if I could stack these units, but I'm guessing not because of
>>> how fast they simply would have to be to be no latency units.
>>>
>>>> Of course we all know absolute zero is impossible without time travel
>>>> ;-)
>>>> There is always at least a few nanoseconds for gate setup/hold times in
>>>> the
>>>> converters, and in the dsp chips, etc, so regardless of "zero" or "near
>>>> zero" latency claims, they are all lower than most people care about
>>>> since
>>>> it's hardware based routing, rather than latent software routing (which
>>>> actually could be nearly as fast if the OS were optimized for it - i.e.
>>>> systems like Radar, etc).
>>> very true, and what I wanted to hear about. Actual convertor to convertor
>>> latency cannot possibly be zero/none. Even Paris is hitting 1.5 mS end
>>> to end. And I have no problems living with that.
>>>
>>>> Marketing.... it's all marketing.... in reality, every single DAW on
>>>> the
>>>> planet adheres to the same physical limitations - they just use
>>>> different
>>>> packaging and emphasis of hardware vs. software. Good try
>>>> Steiny/Yamaha.
>>>>
>>>> Dedric
>>>>
>>>> On 3/16/08 1:49 AM, in article 47dcc2fd$1@linux, "LaMont"
>>>> <jjdpro@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dedric, they are stating 'No' Latency as in Nada..zilch..Nothing.. hey
>>>>> mentioned
>>>>> this at least 5 times. They even critisize other companies claim of
>>>>> "near
>>>>> zero " latency.
>>>>>
>>>>> Look at the video again.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/15/08 10:50 PM, in article 47dcaa29@linux, "Aaron Allen"
Re: Happy New Year!......8 core Mac Pro [message #94504 is a reply to message #94475] Tue, 08 January 2008 17:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nappy is currently offline  Nappy
Messages: 198
Registered: September 2006
Senior Member
tegrate
my
>outboard gear in a way similar to the way I'm doing now with a Multiface,

>MADI/ADI 648, AES32 and a Pair of ADI 8-DD units.
>
>Basically I would be selling off the MADI/ADI-648, the Multiface, a pair
of
>ADI 8-DS units (Nuendo branded) and one of my ADI 8-DD units and replacing

>them with 3 x of the Steiny 816 units and the CC121 controler and an RME
ADI
>192-DD. the reason for the ADI 192-DD is because it will allow the sample

>rate conversion of signals received via ADAT I/O whereas the ADI8-DD will

>not.
>
>What wo
Re: Happy New Year!......8 core Mac Pro [message #94506 is a reply to message #94485] Tue, 08 January 2008 19:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chris Ludwig is currently offline  Chris Ludwig   UNITED STATES
Messages: 868
Registered: May 2006
Senior Member
tage of this?? Well, I could use the Steinberg
>control room function without needing to drastically upgrade my current

>computer to use the CR function with low latency with large
>projects.........and this would allow me to sell the huge Furman HDS-16

>system along with the 5 x HRM-16 remote mixers I'm using.
>
>I *might* come out of this on a break even or even with some money in my

>pocket depending on the cost of the Steinberg hardware. Of course, there's

>also the factor of my liking the RME converters I'd be selling and I don't

>really know diddly about Yamaha converters. thad and I seem to be on the

>same wavelength most of the time and I have to take into account his opinion

>of Yamaha converters.
>
>Well........anyway......this is probably a few months away from being a

>possibility anyway.
>
>Deej
>
>
>
>
>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>news:C402CDC9.1326E%dterry@keyofd.net...
>> Please don't read my post where I said this is a firewire interface.
>> Nothing different going on here from any other fw interface.
>>
>>
>> On 3/16/08 11:50 AM, in article 47dd6112@linux, "Mr. Simplicity"
>> <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Here's a link where you han check out a closeup of the ports:
>>>
>>> http://messe.harmony-central.com/Musikmesse08/Content/Steinb erg/PR/MR816-FireW
>>> ire-Interfaces.html
>>>
>>> Also, I'm listening to the video clip again adn he specifically states

>>> that
>>> it connects to the computer via firewire.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:47dd5efc@linux...
>>>> Yeah, I was a little surprised no one asked the question about how
>>>> exactly
>>>> they achieved no latency at the end when they asked for questions. How

>>>> do
>>>> they do that I wonder? He specifically said all the Cubase channels

>>>> stuff
>>>> would be no latency.
>>>>
>>>> If they have that, then this has truly lived up to what I hoped for
from
>>>> the merger. I will say this: Yamaha is overall the finest and most
>>>> comprehensive large music manufacturer and their products always sound
>>>> good. Since i have used Cubase from the early Atari version in '88 or

>>>> '89,
>>>> I am a pretty big fan of Steiny too.
>>>>
>>>> BTW he did say you could cascade 3 units, and he said they are USB,
not
>>>> firewire.
>>>>
>>>> Aaron Allen wrote:
>>>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:C40220B7.131DC%dterry@keyofd.net...
>>>>>> I only watched part due to time constraints so I didn't catch that

>>>>>> (i.e.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> could tell early on there was nothing new here).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes of course latency is *effectively* "zero" for the builtin dsp
(in
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> out of the onboard mixer), but not in and out of the native system.
>>>>>> Nothing
>>>>>> different from what Totalmix, Cuemix, Soundscape and TDM do, and while
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> may be a few nanoseconds faster than others, it's still not *really*
>>>>>> 0.00000ns.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not what I took away from what he was saying. Check out the

>>>>> video
>>>>> again when you get time dude, I think you may have missed the whole
>>>>> reason why I'd choose this system if I dumped Paris. What I didn't
hear
>>>>> though was if I could stack these units, but I'm guessing not because

>>>>> of
>>>>> how fast they simply would have to be to be no latency units.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course we all know absolute zero is impossible without time travel
>>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>> There is always at least a few nanoseconds for gate setup/hold times

>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> converters, and in the dsp chips, etc, so regardless of "zero" or

>>>>>> "near
>>>>>> zero" latency claims, they are all lower than most people care about
>>>>>> since
>>>>>> it's hardware based routing, rather than latent software routing
>>>>>> (which
>>>>>> actually could be nearly as fast if the OS were optimized for it -

>>>>>> i.e.
>>>>>> systems like Radar, etc).
>>>>>
>>>>> very true, and what I wanted to hear about. Actual convertor to
>>>>> convertor
>>>>> latency cannot possibly be zero/none. Even Paris is hitting 1.5 mS
end
>>>>> to end. And I have no problems living with that.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Marketing.... it's all marketing.... in reality, every single DAW
on
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> planet adheres to the same physical limitations - they just use
>>>>>> different
>>>>>> packaging and emphasis of hardware vs. software. Good try
>>>>>> Steiny/Yamaha.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dedric
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/16/08 1:49 AM, in article 47dcc2fd$1@linux, "LaMont"
>>>>>> <jjdpro@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dedric, they are stating 'No' Latency as in Nada..zilch..Nothing..

>>>>>>> hey
>>>>>>> mentioned
>>>>>>> this at least 5 times. They even critisize other companies claim
of
>>>>>>> "near
>>>>>>> zero " latency.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Look at the video again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/15/08 10:50 PM, in article

Report message to a moderator

Re: Happy New Year!......8 core Mac Pro [message #94508 is a reply to message #94506] Tue, 08 January 2008 19:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dedric Terry is currently offline  Dedric Terry   UNITED STATES
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
Senior Member
at that limit, kudos to Yamaha.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So far, imho RME seems to lead the low latency race overall with

>>>>>>>> ASIO
>>>>>>>> drivers. Imho, until operating systems drop the consumer bloat
war
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>> down to really running lean and mean with true kernel level audio
>>>>>>>> drivers
>>>>>>>> (not the facade of core audio), we may never see lower than 32
>>>>>>>> samples,
>>>>>>>> unless Intel multiplies the number of cores and general buss/memory
>>>>>>>> processing exponentially to outpace the growing OS demands.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still have to wonder what got us to the point that an OS had to
do
>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>> more than boot and access the hardware.... but we've had that
>>>>>>>> discussion
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> few times already. ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dedric
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>The Tibetans have tried to talk about freedom, they were burned to death.
I guess freedom always comes at a price. The Chinese people must have the
will to change their government from the inside, talk from us won't work,
but we can do something and that is boycott their products. We as a people
are going in to debt with China, we are handing them power over us. Meanwhile
our standard of living is going down hill. It's great that you can buy a
two dollar rubber hammer from China and we'll pay four dollars a gallon of
gas because China is using so much oil to make things like rubber hammers
and ship them across the sea.

They are killing their own people. We are empowering them financially by
buying there products and handing them technical expertise. We embolden
them by not standing up to them on human rights and the theft of our defense
and military secrets, not to mention their constant opposition the the US
and their interference in world matters.

China has publicly announced a 35 year plan to take over the world. The
Chinese and the Russians are building super weapons to defeat the US, and
they are currently doing military exercises together right now. They are
supporting and supplying the weapons and technology that is causing the US
problems around the world, this is to weaken us. They have their plans for
us.

We shouldn't hand them the wealth and the power by buying their products,
let them sit on the shelves. One way to turn the tide is for americans to
vote with their dollars. We don't need to support a repressive communist
government with american dollars, and that is exactly what we are doing by
buying Chinese products. A boycott is long over due!

Talking has never worked with communist governments.

Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>I don't think boycotting is the answer. It would hurt average Chinese
>people the most, anyway.
>
>The answer is more communication. Commerce is a form of communication
>and as such, I think more commerce will inevitably bring about a
>metamorphose of the Chinese government. I would prefer to see a peaceful

>evolution rather than a bloody revolution.
>
>Boycotting would get the government hardliners backs up. And
>realistically, your boycott wouldn't "...amount to a hill of beans in
>this world." (add Bogart lisp)
>
>I appreciate your desire to change the situation, but I would suggest
>finding a constructive way to communicate a lot into China, to people,
>the government, anywhere. Comm is the solution. Tell them about freedom.

>Freedom appeals to everybody.
>
>James McCloskey wrote:
>> I think it's time to boycott China and their products, there is no sense
in
>> supporting this government in any way.
>>
>> http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VELU0G0.html
>>
>> http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VEM3KG0.htmlI think this Hardware is "Married" to Cubase 4 . If you look gain at the video
2/3 (2:39-beyond) , they go into great detail how this units "Treats" Cubase
and the Hardware as ONE. Meaning, Cubase is just an "Extension" of the unit.
ALso, meaning, that this unit must have a big piece of Cubase's software
"already" Built-In...!! That's how they can acheive "No -Latency" and do
all that clever Monitoring and even record the Builtin FX while monitoring..
Sweet..

I think Yammy & Steiny "re-thought" the Native missing link(Latency) equation,
with what seems to be a quasi DSP meets Software .Already built-in the units..


I have admit, having the ability to link 3 of these babys has me geeked!!
Because, Yammy & Stein are using Intelligent Firewire called M-Lan.. No other
Firewire interface can be daisy chained using the normal Firewire Protocol..

What's really interesting is that this is only the "First' Product from this
Marriage. We can can probably bet, that more products like their Sweet N12
Mixer/controller is on the horizon. As it stands, this is a great first step..

Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>Yeah, I was a little surprised no one asked the question about how
>exactly they achieved no latency at the end when they asked for
>questions. How do they do that I wonder? He specifically said all the
>Cubase channels stuff would be no latency.
>
>If they have that, then this has truly lived up to what I hoped for from

>the merger. I will say this: Yamaha is overall the finest and most
>comprehensive large music manufacturer and their products always sound
>good. Since i have used Cubase from the early Atari version in '88 or
>'89, I am a pretty big fan of Steiny too.
>
>BTW he did say you could cascade 3 units, and he said they are USB, not

>firewire.
>
>Aaron Allen wrote:
>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>> news:C40220B7.131DC%dterry@keyofd.net...
>>> I only watched part due to time constraints so I didn't catch that (i.e.
I
>>> could tell early on there was nothing new here).
>>>
>>> Yes of course latency is *effectively* "zero" for the builtin dsp (in
and
>>> out of the onboard mixer), but not in and out of the native system.
>>> Nothing
>>> different from what Totalmix, Cuemix, Soundscape and TDM do, and while
it
>>> may be a few nanoseconds faster than others, it's still not *really*
>>> 0.00000ns.
>>
>> That's not what I took away from what he was saying. Check out the video

>> again when you get time dude, I think you may have missed the whole reason

>> why I'd choose this system if I dumped Paris. What I didn't hear though
was
>> if I could stack these units, but I'm guessing not because of how fast
they
>> simply would have to be to be no latency units.
>>
>>> Of course we all know absolute zero is impossible without time travel
;-)
>>> There is always at least a few nanoseconds for gate setup/hold times
in
>>> the
>>> converters, and in the dsp chips, etc, so regardless of "zero" or "near
>>> zero" latency claims, they are all lower than most people care about
since
>>> it's hardware based routing, rather than latent software routing (which
>>> actually could be nearly as fast if the OS were optimized for it - i.e.
>>> systems like Radar, etc).
>>
>> very true, and what I wanted to hear about. Actual convertor to convertor

>> latency cannot possibly be zero/none. Even Paris is hitting 1.5 mS en
Re: Happy New Year!......8 core Mac Pro [message #94522 is a reply to message #94508] Wed, 09 January 2008 11:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chris Ludwig is currently offline  Chris Ludwig   UNITED STATES
Messages: 868
Registered: May 2006
Senior Member

>> them), this interface might be a bit more attractive.
>>
>> Also, I wondering about something. I can enable the functionality of both
>
>> the Frontier Tranzport and my Houston controller simultaneously. Now if
> the
>> Houston could be simultaneously be used for multiple fader moves and the
> the
>> new single fader Steiny controller could also be used for accessing a single
>
>> fader and the channel strip controls, this might end up being a nice
>> combination of functionalities.
>>
>> Three of these new interfaces (sans preamps) along with an RME ADI 192-DD
>
>> and an RME ADI 8-DD would give me 24 analog I/O and allow me to integrate
> my
>> outboard gear in a way similar to the way I'm doing now with a Multiface,
>
>> MADI/ADI 648, AES32 and a Pair of ADI 8-DD units.
>>
>> Basically I would be selling off the MADI/ADI-648, the Multiface, a pair
> of
>> ADI 8-DS units (Nuendo branded) and one of my ADI 8-DD units and replacing
>
>> them with 3 x of the Steiny 816 units and the CC121 controler and an RME
> ADI
>> 192-DD. the reason for the ADI 192-DD is because it will allow the sample
>
>> rate conversion of signals received via ADAT I/O whereas the ADI8-DD will
>
>> not.
>>
>> What would be the advantage of this?? Well, I could use the Steinberg
>> control room function without needing to drastically upgrade my current
>
>> computer to use the CR function with low latency with large
>> projects.........and this would allow me to sell the huge Furman HDS-16
>
>> system along with the 5 x HRM-16 remote mixers I'm using.
>>
>> I *might* come out of this on a break even or even with some money in my
>
>> pocket depending on the cost of the Steinberg hardware. Of course, there's
>
>> also the factor of my liking the RME converters I'd be selling and I don't
>
>> really know diddly about Yamaha converters. thad and I seem to be on the
>
>> same wavelength most of the time and I have to take into account his opinion
>
>> of Yamaha converters.
>>
>> Well........anyway......this is probably a few months away from being a
>
>> possibility anyway.
>>
>> Deej
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>> news:C402CDC9.1326E%dterry@keyofd.net...
>>> Please don't read my post where I said this is a firewire interface.
>>> Nothing different going on here from any other fw interface.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/16/08 11:50 AM, in article 47dd6112@linux, "Mr. Simplicity"
>>> <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here's a link where you han check out a closeup of the ports:
>>>>
>>>> http://messe.harmony-central.com/Musikmesse08/Content/Steinb erg/PR/MR816-FireW
>>>> ire-Interfaces.html
>>>>
>>>> Also, I'm listening to the video clip again adn he specifically states
>
>>>> that
>>>> it connects to the computer via firewire.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:47dd5efc@linux...
>>>>> Yeah, I was a little surprised no one asked the question about how
>>>>> exactly
>>>>> they achieved no latency at the end when they asked for questions. How
>
>>>>> do
>>>>> they do that I wonder? He specifically said all the Cubase channels
>
>>>>> stuff
>>>>> would be no latency.
>>>>>
>>>>> If they have that, then this has truly lived up to what I hoped for
> from
>>>>> the merger. I will say this: Yamaha is overall the finest and most
>>>>> comprehensive large music manufacturer and their products always sound
>>>>> good. Since i have used Cubase from the early Atari version in '88 or
>
>>>>> '89,
>>>>> I am a pretty big fan of Steiny too.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW he did say you could cascade 3 units, and he said they are USB,
> not
>>>>> firewire.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aaron Allen wrote:
>>>>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:C40220B7.131DC%dterry@keyofd.net...
>>>>>>> I only watched part due to time constraints so I didn't catch that
>
>>>>>>> (i.e.
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> could tell early on there was nothing new here).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes of course latency is *effectively* "zero" for the builtin dsp
> (in
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> out of the onboard mixer), but not in and out of the native system.
>>>>>>> Nothing
>>>>>>> different from what Totalmix, Cuemix, Soundscape and TDM do, and while
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> may be a few nanoseconds faster than others, it's still not *really*
>>>>>>> 0.00000ns.
>>>>>> That's not what I took away from what he was saying. Check out the
>
>>>>>> video
>>>>>> again when you get time dude, I think you may have missed the whole
>>>>>> reason why I'd choose this system if I dumped Paris. What I didn't
> hear
>>>>>> though was if I could stack these units, but I'm guessing not because
>
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> how fast they simply would have to be to be no latency units.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course we all know absolute zero is impossible without time travel
>>>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>>> There is always at least a few nanoseconds for gate setup/hold times
>
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> converters, and in the dsp chips, etc, so regardless of "zero" or
>
>>>>>>> "near
>>>>>>> zero" latency claims, they are all lower than most people care about
>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>> it's hardware based routing, rather than latent software routing
>>>>>>> (which
>>>>>>> actually could be nearly as fast if the OS were optimized for it -
>
>>>>>>> i.e.
>>>>>>> systems like Radar, etc).
>>>>>> very true, and what I wanted to hear about. Actual convertor to
>>>>>> convertor
>>>>>> latency cannot possibly be zero/none. Even Paris is hitting 1.5 mS
> end
>>>>>> to end. And I have no problems living with that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Marketing.... it's all marketing.... in reality, every single DAW
> on
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> planet adheres to the same physical limitations - they just use
>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>> packaging and emphasis of hardware vs. software. Good try
>>>>>>> Steiny/Yamaha.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dedric
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/16/08 1:49 AM, in article 47dcc2fd$1@linux, "LaMont"
>>>>>>> <jjdpro@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dedric, they are stating 'No' Latency as in Nada..zilch..Nothing..
>
>>>>>>>> hey
>>>>>>>> mentioned
>>>>>>>> this at least 5 times. They even critisize other companies claim
> of
>>>>>>>> "near
>>>>>>>> zero " latency.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Look at the video again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/15/08 10:50 PM, in article 47dcaa29@linux, "Aaron Allen"
>>>>>>>>> <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> semi-pro/pro work because of the latency they can't seem to lick.
Re: Happy New Year!......8 core Mac Pro [message #94529 is a reply to message #94506] Wed, 09 January 2008 13:49 Go to previous message
LaMontt  is currently offline  LaMontt   
Messages: 424
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member

gMMmGk3KzZ2lwNn3hnB9GtRrU4ub6bnRLBSU bp3PsZ/FmtFT
jX/EPHb+07j/AOLqOTxVrmzjXvEAH/YTn/8Ai6khtVxjaUwcEke2aZNApXgZ z6V5jzBHLGmz
i/j34x10fBvxETrWtSbLQsFkv5pFyCCCVZiDyB1opvx9tcfBnxKeD/oT/hRW 0MbzLc7sLS91
6G1+zzap/wAKS8NdR/oSV2LW6eua5T9niOE/BDw0dpz9iTNdn5Mf901+fzzC Kk0ds8Kr/Cim
1uuetMa2X1q79nTnimtbIT0NT/aMTN4XsimLZT3qRIVzU/2VMYwaekCL1BOP aj+0Y9xLCvsR
rAmB8wAqvrerW3hjTZb29uo7WzhGXkdsKvp+J9OprReOKJGcvHCioXZmdVVA OSSSRgAck18l
ftn6knxX0dfEUWttc+CvDVzBGbHRZkvZrwMwMl5OBIYkiUNHtDq2ELMw+Ybf UyqMsZWVOLsu
r/rqzSOGXb+vU9f8Z/tX+FPCN4yzu0AtoXupprrFpDBEmMM7NyASR/DXwdZf s9+E/EWv+LZ9
O8WeFoL3V9Zn1HT7nSYtQvLvTYpHmdY90TomB5gzuTPBx1r7O8Z/sleE/EGn SW9toVnY6Xqe
2XxQ91Jc2V9qwghIjJnt0y53dUUojZ6NxjmNe/4JzfA/VLG6s7Hw43huW/sl RzDfT2s9zIsJ
8ncZLjacZ4EqgDODjmvr8DPC4XSDlrv/AF/Wh3rATSvGP4/1+muh3H7KGn+H fhV8F/CXgaCS
yt9U0fToYp4YYZY47mZ08x5lZwNxdmLHJznI7V6rHZNleqhh/FXl9n8LvCfg /XdM1rXdG8rW
NWt7Gy0zTQUWG3dIVicHynaIn5S332AyMZr1TSHkuIZI5vLLRucAEEoCBhTg kEj2PavAzRKE
vbwk7S1d+77d0clbAOmub+v6Zcjt2EQIXC44I9agjjYSZAP16GryyrBGMnJP OCMDiuY8feNo
PB/ha4vJLhY5GYRweYd6s5ySOmTgA8fSvIpYyU5KENWzmjhW3/X9feX9Z1yD w9Cs95cxW8Rk
VYzMwRJXbogz1Y46Dmvyo1f4o+D/AILfEX4o+DdPsr3TPFcPiO6s9GSzN0NV 2o7BFiCK8IRi
xJO9cZPtj339t7wP43+Mt/p2hy2Xw2FwDHfaTe2+sS/2zamQfuZn3IJomX5S VRDGRwX4zUWl
fBHxlrGsxa7c+LNCttcsJfL1bVX0f7RcXLRsFaVGdCoJUDPmEDgnOMmvvspw 0cPFzqSu5Lb0
27+Z1/VvZPli7v8AD9Nj3f8A4J9eAb7wP+zf4ej1LR7/AE3xBriPf6jJcyNN Lel5pWDlskDI
OQuc4YHnmvcrbBY4BySQdwOR+fNfO/hb9nr4aavrcGt+LItf+I3jiCbMN/4q 1V723hkTKn7N
bkiziYMOI49xUY6dB7Z4V1/ZqkdnNJGWmXKJzuiYKTt5zkf/AFq8DM6E3OVe Lb6v/ga6r1sR
XwPL+8T/AM/68kdHKX2ErubHORnIxXhv7bf7GegfttfDCPRtXur7RtY0eR7r RdUs41ke0nkX
DI8TECWN9qZXcpyoIYd/dpsww/vCqqzBSTx9ea5/W/Fun6DbzXN7qlppsFt+ 8MlxNGzk/wCx
GMu7eihck8DNeVhMTX9qpUL8y2sY08JOfwr+v67nw5+wZ8SYPhX8H4PB+geJ PDt3qEVnFuj1
KCayWylfeZgTGQzBQMnPAJOXx08h8afsVeO/2svjc3izwZLplsv277PqWqrc +Tb2ssIX/SEI
Jd3zkALnhBlq0JP2lfCnwd0/V/CHjq31/WteeY3c1wugabJalnDeRNGz3SOA yNH8rJGRgKVG
K+uP2FPjXomveBLvwnaW9zZv4QCxXU8/kqs00paRwfKkkQOoK5+Y43AZ4r7v H4mthqcq9GF2
7fd36X/pm81OUEovVen4fhtc968OJNDo9tFe3Rv7uKFY5blk2GdwAC+O2SM4 7Zq/Ltl5OBxx
VeymW5j8yNkkjblWRgykdOCKm2EnI5HvX53PE6nGoNvU4n4/xqnwU8Tcc/Yn 5x9KKl/aGjb/
AIUl4lIH/Lk9FdeFxKcXdnZh4NR0NL9ndf8AiyHhnhv+PJO/1rtAnP8AFz71 xX7Oxz8EPDPP
/LildnuI+n1r8/q4h87Xmes6ZJ5W4dGP40GAns3HvTVuNvcf99VLa3JnY4XJ B6Bs5rP6zJbi
9miIwgn+L+lHkZQ7RuyPXp9a+Wv+Cu37RPxB+AXwS8MWfw+1U+HfEHijX0sZ L1IIjcR2whdm
CtICI8uY8vwcd+tfNuieKfi7/wAIRLbP8Y9RtPFNhc/b59el+IbT2wt/Kx9n FrI3lMcndkjH
BHavq8o4cxGPwyxUZxjFtpXvfT5bff6HLUnGMuSzb9D2P/gsx+25rf7Lvgnw V4W8KRWh1rxZ
dy6jfyX1sZ7aSxttsf2Ur1bzZJVztIICdea4278SxftSfs1eFPE2iHQ5zqlm yXnh8xGK90vU
4l8tjAF+Z0V9pKOCpjYHcCoDfLP7aH/BQHxB41Hwb0LxdBaeIfF/gD7Xqmva u0Fur3UVzKFh
hj+zny3X7PHFIz4yWK9wxPMfDb/goF46/Yf1TxNa+FNB8KeItJ8eD7TbX93a XC3kZcjHlyRy
jtwV25yevFfpGT5PWwuXxhCC9qm766S95q9+1rNaXt6nP7VXavp/Xkfrr8Gd Fg1jRrNrK8ub
rRrm2Xe8tsU+zIquqhInK/ICCDmIZyMBuq9zpvw0sYtc0i7jubuZWEjR7rd4 kdSE4ADISmBw
uCDkHtivxr+Ev/BXz9oXxR8WtUt9R8TwRy31pPNp2mLokENvpNxBE00KRw7f MKuI2i+ctkyg
8tivtD4T/t3aX8SvgHYeKfibFrugfESK4ntrzTbHSjHHfKpCxzxmXEURZWUH c4AZCdoJFXis
qrRd5bPtr9+i+89Kli6VuVPb5fdd/M+oPGdzdXXjKym083+qTJO8YENm0Nvb QthkVtwBk5Vh
uTcBnk810nwxv5dTi1U3H2c3UNzh44gD5XyLhTgD3xx0A5Iwa+APG3/BSLVP Fulr4Z87UPDm
savZ3ot10SxzrOvyfZJWt4QEMzQMrqFMse75nB+QBq5rwD+yz+1XP4TOk6Bo PjTwwl7Lbym4
1PxWyXLsq8GaeWeOc7WkVvkiwTEykFcY4M1yynLDezr1Y03pZyaV7PXt+HzO XEYmLdr3v/Wx
+mXxV8d2fwp+GviDxPfxvcWXhrTbnU5o4slpEgiaRlGOeduPxr8rvAH7fPiv 9pLXo9R13xHa
JpwzOsEdjBAloGJ/drKIj5WCwG9jyQOcnFfra/heVvC/9n6/Hb6q13Z/Zb8T Qnyb4MgWfIGB
sfLdOzV8ieGP+CJnwN+H+p6tfaKfHdpeamU+wsviPaNFO8N/o+2JWPTb+9aT 5SR3zXyfDOa5
fhnN4qLc21ytJP1t23M25ppRWj/rq7mX4M+Mkf7R3iu31Ir4ZS8s7UTrDpl3 Ld3VtEitEjzS
FBCyseVEbuAVYHBBUdZ8Ph59mkZV5o5pnleNgF3gBkwccYkEk8ec/e2+lfMX wv8AhRYW37TX
xL8Z6XpnhxvCGl3wsbddQ1KTULq6W1jAlcXELqjFpFLEOZCWY/3cH6G8B60J dAtobqRWdohE
gA+6eM9wMbix6dga/Q61CMI2p7afLyNoVOaV5f1+XnsYf7ZXxPuPCPw2aHRJ UbxVrd7b6bpK
x2yTtNczXCksyOrKwyXcqVIG4ivSPGnhnX/2etE+H3i2ARy202v29prmlm+m McqXBZHnhjlO
EZSDIUgVF+/8mMY8E+JmlXHxM/aQ0PTba7Omab4Stlu5bpI5JTHNMSqsdnRh GJmDE4DBenUe
XfBj44/Ev4pftMaNDqlpq2oreXtwmmNb6cbm6tVilmtjKsJ80KA25G3AcE+t P6p7SioO1rO/
o1axMqq5pL7j9J/E8Vv8UPC8ktjDI81vKt7Yef5kKShQcMOVD5bIZSRxxxwa 0dJ8If8ACwfh
AlpFcaRLd6tpXkJJLY7ktI5YwsirsZZMlCwyHXsee/w34a/4KZ+NfCnxn0jS Na0u21Xwf4hl
1Gzs5r7R206+FxbwliqSK6IjCV4Qwkj29ccivsfwp8e/Bln4ehtdQ8SaRBdh flSWd5SzBeSy
oig/OGAXc2QAcnNeRLL54WEaUVpuuv3nZR9lJWi/6/rXqY2tfsreCYtf0tNS 0rRiunRny5Le
3imGnSgj5Yt6tJDuGWIDjBGVwxJrpNO/Z70LwtrOrajpujaBpdnPBbTmXSo/ slxM8KurPLEF
ETZRmGQCTgZJwMbmieI9N+Jvh5NW02SyijO9HdMgyuBzIAvP0yQeea5b4r65 YeDdBS4uNZjs
RqEkcK2l5GovJoN0ZmCASBmAh81iVVmwDVc9SVoNu5SpU43kkvX5HT6deWp1 CG1jtYrWS5g8
8IqhPMbq3A4DfMMr1HuMUnirxRo/gfTxc6vfW+nwlhGryn7xPYe9fIXxM/4K FeKfG3iU+Dfh
v8LPEXirxJqE11HYG8h+yWsEcbfLKDhChBRh5krptYqMHIJ9A+IH7NfxE+J/ igz6h9j0q0mR
CInv/t09rmFWeGXy3TeBJlMrNt4ztOa+ax+V01i74urGknrq1d+dumvf8Tgq qnzOUdfT/gHb
/EH4naL8Ufgp43TR5ZJjpdqUnEke0fNnay88j5SOcUVytr+y3B8CPhH431Jb 6e4utR0dbcxB
ViiixtZztVFyS44ySQM880V5rnh4VZxwkuaCa1for/iaUI+7qeq/s67P+FIe GflX/jxSu22o
f4Erzr9m3VA/wQ8Nbh0sk/rXodmUu0DbcKehzwe3WvzevXSqSXmz13SaH4jX rGnNOkso7u2e
LdOolRoz5MpjdAwwSrDlSB0I5Bqe3sQuDt7evSqlzrNvpzsjyKHB5CjeR+AB rGNeUpctNNvy
IdOR+aH/AAVE/YFX4ReH9M8Z6H468aRaLd6pDYalFcXLFxJKTsaS4QoduMjL AnPfJrmLj4Na
R8OPgsNIl0PRNV1i8EENtqtn4w1FXkllV/3rTNhBiRAqgMRlvmK4r7H/AOCo Nqnj79nHUvDG
m3+l3Wpwalp97qVhFdRTX+mWYlyLiW3D71UHZn5eA2SRXxJrGt+GvEll4S+F Wq6Klt4k1PWr
e0vvsHg9bnUnQMGe5t7xGGUKBm5UsuWzwMV+98LYzG18tjLGXum/XlVmm0te 6+48bE0lSqtb
adf+CfO3xV8Saj8O/FemeCtahj8SXT6BY6mdR1a5a+lie7t1mZEdm4CFyqsH IYJnvisbwf5G
la5Do9zJDeIwN5p6qFAtnLsqwMQTgHbwe4YDHNewf8F1vhxbfBT9pn4e+INF sp7PwvqXhK10
i03Iyqslm7wiFsgYfyjCcHrnNfJug6je+KdRn8RT3NzofhPSJdlzcffN5IQD 9lhU4EkrADPZ
BhmwMZ+yyjE/W8FTxNrcy67p3s9O91scUoOLcXue2J+09Z/CT4oXPgPwhd6X 4gsdRvvNvdag
sBbR2eUZ5oraJeCq7S26TuTlQc55HwB8Y/H/AIx8Ha/ql/4fuPHPh1o3W/W2 hS1n0OKNBIZY
ZI428nIZskq2QnNXNJ+Cniv4vT3ni3QPhh4ssrjxkDDb6lcT+faxQSKqSSRD yIhFuTI8yV3y
rNjB5r6u/ZG/ZU/4Z1+GF7Y6qlrqV/4jDC9gBE1rFDsYeU5Iw7HewYjjGAOm a7JypwWqu9P6
0BN7R/4B8y/s1a344XxjHqnhzw74x0Twzc4Fv4hv4bq7msoD87xpqBijhiWW QAs6qhI4JIr7
p0n416Dd/DTWtM1DU/Cs2o6val0vdQ8Q6ddXPmJ6tJOPLLMSoBPXncR08K/a R/Zk8Ky/BvyL
Gy165stLVV+y/wDCQXL2dmqDhlhuXkUoMAEIVYDp6V6B4L8Gad8PPAEuhaNd /CjxPFOYYbOO
78P21p9hLlgUkZGMspAGCxzzzk8iuXEKnUtO2v8AXUuLknZf1+Z7V/wRj+I8 2geFfiF4d8V6
rJbldYtrvSVvtfhvLVoZImDrbMkrICGT5gn95OOlfZ3jjU49J0aWXyrm8kij knEVtC0sr7EL
gIFGSxxgAckkYr5V/wCCZH7E2i+EfhPqvibW/D/hmbUvE2tT39ukFkjQWkSb YlWFnGShMbMD
gfeyBzXvf7R+ieIdQ+HlxHoNjpt9cMjrLFeXYtl8sqclW8iYE8YwYyMH8K/C s7x2DlxDJ05a
Ka5tkrqydvmtT1cLTbipy0+9nxb4o8S6b4C+CfxHMd5rlrEs+6W2vEMd4lxc eSsq3BffIHO5
ztaTO7sOlerfBDSWXwWmsSR7Y5oswkhcuv8Ae5/nwcV+VGv+KviH4N+KfiHx x4Wg1fwTBq90
JpFMLXNqUcj5JdsEVu6O+CB5YHOO9e0eC/8AgrDq/wAO7S58MfEXR5bW4ubf el5plm48sPwW
MMjrt4zjaxUdABjFft08LUcE463/AMkcMJ0+a0en9f18tD6T8b+CJbPXNZ8c Xeo39tp2oWDi
0tk1Wa2S4n37YXkWJ0dlCdAWwfOOB1r5U/Yq+EfjS98XQeKdUk1W10uXUJdP +26NBp0L2Mxc
703y4lJGTkhtxXJycmvs/TtG8Lf8FIv2frF/B9z8RE8P6Tc/a7/UbbTm06bV LSGNyum2HmSk
KxGxXnCMoKnaScV8rfAiDw38B/iPdWHja2k0Lwy+oXd9okV3qt6sChWkHkSy x7syp8hDOpLD
uDzTw9a8JRW63ViJw5Wuz8/8v0/MyfiT4G1L9nX4xaB4k1bTdctfDt9czLZT QWenpeQ+aCBK
GtsgISQGyw6jOa988HaXrNlrElh4lFxpaRrGY1CRyOUKkgKY1IZtpBwASSDx 6UPghD4a8WfA
3xn4lv8AT9aWxsNXsvD1jNcXc12kUd0RiXyptuyPIQcMXHyFhzxjeJ9G+Ien /tf3PhPTW1LX
PD2s2r6xpd5qtvcO1lEkEckpjnKpC8JmbyxHvIDlSSm0Z1lPmfK91/wP8zNR tq+v9fpoanjz
/gpDqfwHv9R8OeE/EcKaNdTLAslxOs8qL8oLDKhSQDjGxscc4FeCeIf2p9X0 rxrpni+a9l+J
/irT76S5mtbZJL630+0VHiR3nw7Z2nepTaEMhyOcD2L9snwj4TvfG3wnjvLS 7uNZtbozGPT3
ihuJt725/fKzNJy6kcOzfeyWPNdx4c+E2m+Cf2oPCOv6NqE3h5fDWoRyTaXD brcQXoViDuLM
GV9rtlst244rGThTpSqQheVm+17dL+fctzm7RvovO57H/wAEktV8ffGbQvEn jzxnaajaeG9Q
uYk8LWupRR+dGI/ME80ZWOM7CDEoZgclCQeuftNW3RDbnpnDDOM9jUGmlvs6 NhpB2OMfLV6O
A7fmz+NfzXnmfSx2LniZLlvslsktEv8APbW56lGi0tdTg/2h2Y/BDxNkn/jy foelFSftFxBv
gf4mwflFi9FbZRi3KnJ+Z0U6TSsfA/7Unxr8ReCLL4eaRY+Km8IafZeFW1K3 miklSS8vJpxb
BiVwHWFC7+WSM+9dh4M/4KQeOvgy32nWX8NfGDwdb25uZtU0Bha6jFGzrtkk g3HYoRiclWUk
clc8fUnwJ8L2Xi79nzw5a6tYWeq2TWSfuLqFJIySCM4YEZ5615Z8V/8Agjn8 Gvir4ifURD4s
8MNNtE9voV/bxwSEKVDD7RBM6cEjajKmAMKK9HA8S5FKj9RzSh8N/eSTbu+6 5ZRfo2u5rXwu
JU3UpS0fTp/l+p7z4C+Peg/G3wdp+qeE3ur+z1uA3VnKYGQLEOGdywwhViyY PO5TjIBNa0Uf
2LUra0SZ1kkWRo9ow0QTAZ+hGQz8bjk4Nfnz+0LZ+F/2fviT4a0n4a/FPW9A 8ZeAdLt/D1lp
V0BHHcW0N2x8s3ECoVllmfdIJEZGDMflBVa7b4Kf8FG9R8BXN9efFGVvEiJc /ZG1LRS1xNCC
m0TyWxPlpG5jY5iKDlMR5JNfU5Vw1So4f6zgeZxmr2lpK3Tola2un/DFPGwU vZ1dH+H3rz7n
2p4d0HRvDUlulppOmrb3MkyXMM1qsv2sSKVlMr4yzsTgsSfvHtXmnwo/Zn0T 4LfGXXfF2lWC
61eQxTQ+HdPuJ/JTTRPu895pMNyBmNNoLFCchckjprf9sP4aaT8K9Q8ez+Lf D0fhzT1SE3qX
QSTe2P3TxuVZJDgHayg456c189fGj/gt58Jfgn448PaVf2Hi+5j8R2lvq13q FvbxMmlWlwN0
EjozhnZ4vLk2LjEbqfvHbXq4Wji5qUacW76P87fdo+utjSrHDpxbsrarb7/v Pb/FfwvN34Nu
vCms3On+LvCutopu9B8TaJb6rZA5+YR4EUu1SPkLuzpx83Ar5n8f/wDBNb9n 7wroWp6zffDm
2S68KWE1xoTtrl7/AGUWCswjNm1w0Y/eZO0DDlTuDZJP1GfjPH4t1/Tp9Mjg uLTU9MiuIdSt
ZA1veCUgQeWy7i+7cregHX0qaHQdY1XT5otX0a+tl8iazmF3ZnyZ5BtYb84A OAeg5DZ9q6uS
s4uHPKF7P3Zcr/Bq/Zp3uvkYV6NKou7+f4nyDpHimLVo7i3mb7Th
Previous Topic: My Error 7/7 dilemma continued...
Next Topic: New Digital console/controller from Neve.
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue May 19 23:07:22 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.13437 seconds