| Geek thread [message #97641] |
Sun, 30 March 2008 21:31  |
![Deej [5] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "Deej [5] is currently offline")
Deej [5]
Messages: 373
Registered: March 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
s much larger
> than some aficionado groups for other pieces of discontinued technology,
> and
> some of those smaller groups have got quite a lot of very meaningful work
> done. And 400 users worldwide may not be Nuendo numbers but for small
> developers itıs nothing to sneeze at.
>
> Hope this is of interest!
>
> - Kerry
>"Deej" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>I thought I was. I conceived this notion during a paranoid moment during
>an acid trip back in the early 70's when I decided that nuclear testing
was
>going to start a interdimentional chain reaction that would eventually cause
>our sun to explode. Of course, I then proceeded to write it all down and
>turn it in as a mini thesis for a political science class I was taking at
>the time......then I sobered up.
>
>I was embarrassed about this until I saw the last few minutes of Men In
Black,
>which totally vindicated me.
>;)
It's worse than you know!!
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Geek thread [message #97654 is a reply to message #97641] |
Mon, 31 March 2008 08:37  |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
a crash yet, and I've never seen the meters and transport run so
>> smoothly. It 'feels' silly good.
>>
>> Definitely worth looking into for Paris on XP.
>>
>> -Carl
>>
>>
>> Aaron Allen wrote:
>>> Google the phrase * MicroXP v0.82 *
>>> Looks like a bit torrent.
>>>
>>> AA
>>>
>
>doesn't the description say it does Lan networking ?
Aaron Allen wrote:
> well, I'm thinking standalone never-touch-the-internet kind of stuff.
> Production box only. For this, do you see any problems?
> AA
>
>
> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:487031e4$1@linux...
>> If you install a boxed copy of XP and patch it, you're not all that far
>> from
>> this. You might have to do a bit to stop some services from starting, but
>> it's only a few. I don't about the handle and thread counts mentioned re:
>> MicroXP
>>
>> However, with MicroXP you lose LAN networking, user accounts (I know what
>> they're doing to do that, don't think it's a good idea), remote desktop,
>> automatic updates (you want to run an unpatched XP machine? You sure?),
>> and
>> a bunch of other stuff. I don't think that's a good trade.
>>
>> TCB
>>
>> "Mike Bloomer" <tubeguru2006@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Micro XP is a hacked stripped down version of XP.It's apparently popular
>> with
>>> gamers... A friend at work got a hold of a copy and I had a chance to try
>>> it.I work at a computer repair shop and the idea behind trying it was to
>>> make some of the older P3s usable again. It works! It takes about 10
>>> minutes
>>> to do a complete install. When the system is booted up it uses 36 meg of
>>> memory and runs 15 processes! Nearly everything has been stripped from the
>>> OS. There is no local networking, no scheduling, and no internet explorer.
>>> It will run Firefox though so i
|
|
|
|
| Re: Geek thread [message #97669 is a reply to message #97654] |
Mon, 31 March 2008 19:40 |
Rich Lamanna
Messages: 316
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
it
> >labour-intensive but the end result is that Iım fairly confident in that
> >number as a ³hard floor² the loss of a few users in the intervening
months
> >would be counterbalanced by the certainty of undercount.
> >
> >Iıll finish with a general observation - ³what we were² or ³what we might
> >once have been² has some minor academic/historical interest to me, but as
> a
> >"minority case" - a returning user after years of absence - I naturally
> come
> >to it from the perspective of ³where we are right now². Iım not
interested
> >in ³might have beens² any more - Iım interested in what we might achieve
> >starting from here and going forward.
> >
> >So while it's true we were larger long ago, a hard floor of 125 real
users
> >is a good strong number, an excellent number, for aficionado-driven
efforts
> >for a discontinued niche market DAW to go forward with. Itıs much larger
> >than some aficionado groups for other pieces of discontinued technology,
> and
> >some of those smaller groups have got quite a lot of very meaningful work
> >done. And 400 users worldwide may not be Nuendo numbers but for small
> >developers itıs nothing to sneeze at.
> >
> >Hope this is of interest!
> >
> >- Kerry
> >
>Hey Dimitrios,
So you are saying that with Paris in XP the sync plate will
allow Cubase to chase Paris sample accurate?
I have been using SMPTE in Paris to MTC in the past.
Will I still need to do this while using an external WC?
I'm ready for detailed instructions if this is possible!
Thanks D,
Tom
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:486e1eca$1@linux...
>
> Hi Tom,
> I have posted this already on the graphics post I made but in case you did
> not catch it here it is again...
> Hi Tom,
> My emails still bounce back so I will use this forum to reply to your
> questions
> !
>
> Hi !!
> I hope that you are well with your foot !
> Regarding your questions all are positive !
> Yes sample accuraccy there.
> No pci extra just the synplate added to scope card.
> Use ASIO2 protocol under cubase.
> By starting Paris Cubase follows sample accurate.
> Let me know if you need more detailed instructions as how to do this !
> Regards,
> Dimitrios
>Two of my friends never post but use Paris.
Tom
"Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:4872addb@linux...
> Rod
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
