The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » Going between Paris 3.0 & 2.2?

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Going between Paris 3.0 & 2.2?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Going between Paris 3.0 & 2.2? [message #62711]

Mon, 09 January 2006 12:15

Kateeba

Messages: 76
Registered: August 2005
Location: Hamden, Connecticut

Member

;eksoundNO.com> wrote:
>The MADI cards will set you back almost as much as the desk itself! We
>went the optical route here... WAY cheaper.
>
>David.
>
>LaMont wrote:
>
>> You're right $$$ Cha-ching!!! :) But, Digi is giving new customers at
least
>> $3,500.00 in software plugins. Maybe more, but I do knwo that it's at
least
>> $3500.00
>>
>> I dont think you need 96 I/o channels, but hey !! you never know :)
>> PTHD-3(Axcel) had all the processing power one needs to replace 4 UAD1
cards.
>> Being that you can run the uad plugs on the HD cards, or run Fx expansion
>> vst/Rtas converter app..
>>
>> I just got a great quote from sweetwater for PTHD2

Louis Guarino Jr.
www.enchantedvibrations.net

Report message to a moderator

Re: Going between Paris 3.0 & 2.2? [message #62723 is a reply to message #62711]

Mon, 09 January 2006 14:07

Tyrone Corbett

Messages: 253
Registered: August 2006

Senior Member

racks with up to 8 x various analog compressors and EQ's with
>>
>> ADC
>>
>>>>being
>>>>
>>>>>>>>applied in Cubase SX to keep them phase coherent..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>4 x UAD-1 cards in the Cubase SX DAW provide stereo reverb to the
>>>>
>>>>tracks
>>>>
>>>>>>>>using the stereo drum bus and center panned stereo and mono reverb
>>>
>>>to
>>>
>>>>>>>>individual mono tracks (the UAD-1 EMT 140 is often requested on
>>
>> lead
>>
>>>>>VOX
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>tracks-UA hit a home run with this emulation) along with track EQ
>>>
>>>and
>>>
>>>>>the
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>LA-2A, 1176, Fairchild etc. compressiors on mono tracks before they
>>>>
>>>>are
>>>>
>>>>>>>>streamed back into Paris for summing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Going between Paris 3.0 & 2.2? [message #62727 is a reply to message #62723]

Mon, 09 January 2006 14:42

Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005

Senior Member

;> Hey Dave
>>
>> Now there's a place I haven't been to in thirty years...must be totally
>> different in the winter.
>>
>> Emailed DJ and got things sorted out...almost a Paris 101 class.
>>
>> What I meant by normalled was the ADAT module's input / output correspond
>> to the in/out of the patchbay slots the ADAT module is assigned
>> too...wrong choice of words.
>>
>> And yes you can record more than two tracks at a time in
>> CEPro...multitrack mode will handle as many inputs as you can throw at it
>> (well 16 anyway)
>>
>> I'm going to attempt to get wavelab working today...my initial attempts
>> only produced what I can best describe as a lurching in Wavelab when I
>> hit play in Paris.
>>
>> Once it's sorted out I'll be installing Nuendo 2.0 and see if I can get
>> that to work with Dakota and then sync'd to Paris...gonna be a fun day or
>> so
>>
>> One other thing. I hear there are issues with two ADAT modules in the
>> same MEC and Windows XP...is this correct
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Don
>>
>>
>> "Dave(EK Sound)" <audioguy_editout_@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>> news:43dda643$1@linux...
>>
>>>Hi Don,
>>>
>>>Sorry about the delay, was out at Lake Louise for the day... just got
>>>back in. NOTHING in Paris is normalled... you have to patch everything.
>>>There are two ways to route individual tracks... through "inserts" and
>>>through "auxes". If you use the aux sends, you can select external on
>>>each aux bus and hard pan to get up to 16 sends per MEC. Using inserts,
>>>you have to patch the inputs of the inserts as well as the outputs... it
>>>doesn't matter if you are

Report message to a moderator

Re: Going between Paris 3.0 & 2.2? [message #62732 is a reply to message #62727]

Mon, 09 January 2006 14:48

John [1]

Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005

Senior Member

M2K...

http://www.audio-service.com/AS/Artikel.nsf/show/22680D624BF 52D3EC1256C310055CF90?OpenDocument&URL=AS/Artikel.nsf/Ar tNav?OpenNavigator&Art=XMADI;

You would need two of these as well...

David.

LaMont wrote:
> Well, the RME-Madi card(s) price don't look too bad for the 64 channels per
> card. I want to be able to stream 96 channel from the yamaha DM-2000.. So,the
> Optical way would cost, 4- 9652(s) is almost the same. $2400(9652) vs $2600.00(Madi)
>
> EK Sound <spamnot.info@eksoundNO.com> wrote:
>
>>The MADI cards will set you back almost as much as the desk itself! We
>>went the optical route here... WAY cheaper.
>>
>>David.
>>
>>LaMont wrote:
>>
>>
>>>You're right $$$ Cha-ching!!! :) But, Digi is giving new customers at
>
> least
>
>>>$3,500.00 in software plugins. Maybe more, but I do knwo that it's at
>
> least
>
>>>$3500.00
>>>
>>>I dont think you need 96 I/o channels, but hey !! you never know :)
>>>PTHD-3(Axcel) had all the processing power one needs to replace 4 UAD1
>
> cards.
>
>>>Being that you can run the uad plugs on the HD cards, or run Fx expansion
>>>vst/Rtas converter app..
>>>
>>>I just got a great quote from sweetwater for PTHD2-Axcel) with Contol24
>
> mix
>
>>>controller, Apogee AD/DA16x..Slew of Plugin (free) from Digi..20K..( Not
>>>including the Mac.) You don't need a G5 to run PT-HD/TDM.. You can, but
>
> not
>
>>>a necessity. I have access to a Dual 877 G4 or I might buld a nice PC
>
> to
>
>>>run it on. For those how have not seen PT-HD?LE run on a PC, they are
>
> in
>
>>>for a real shock. The speed difference is Amazing!!!
>>>
>>>I've been weighing the Yammy 02r96/DM-2000,Nuendo,RME MADI(2) scenario..the
>>>first coming to 9k for the 02Rm, 18k for the DM2000..Decisions.. :)
>>>???????
>>>
>>>
>>>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>.........errr..........that should have been 96 digital I/O. guess I
>>>>wouldn't be needing that though with the PT rig, would I? Also, I'm going
>>>
>>>to
>>>
>>>
>>>>need all new software so throw that into the equation for another $5k
>
> at
>
>>>>least for good TDM plu

Report message to a moderator

Re: Going between Paris 3.0 & 2.2? [message #62752 is a reply to message #62727]

Mon, 09 January 2006 17:52

Aaron Allen

Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008

Senior Member

Cubase CH 40>RME 2 ADAT 3-17 out > Paris CH 9
>>>>>>>>>Cubase CH 41>RME 2 ADAT 3-18 out > Paris CH 10
>>>>>>>>>Cubase CH 42>RME 2 ADAT 3-19 out > Paris CH 11
>>>>>>>>>Cubase CH 43>RME 2 ADAT 3-20 out > Paris CH 12
>>>>>>>>>Cubase CH 45>RME 2 ADAT 3-21 out > Paris CH 13
>>>>>>>>>Cubase CH 46>RME 2 ADAT 3-22 out > Paris CH 14
>>>>>>>>>Cubase ST CH 47L/ Stereo Group 2 L> RME 3 ADAT 3-23 out > Paris
>>>
>>>CH
>>>
>>>
>>>>15
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Cubase ST CH 48R/ Stereo Group 2 R> RME 3 ADAT 3-24 out > Paris
>>>
>>>CH
>>>
>>>
>>>>16
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Paris S/PDIF I/O for MECs 1, 2 and 3, Sony V77, Quantec Yardstick,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Lexicon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>PC90 (Core 32 system coaxial spdif I/O) are all bussed to a digital
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>patchbay
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>for routing to different Paris submixes as needed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>POD XT Pro is patched directly to the spdif I/O of one of the RME
>>>>
>>>>HDSP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>9652's and set up as an external insert effect or send effect as
>>>>>
>>>>>needed
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Cubase SX.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Power Technology DSP/FX card is patched to the S/PDIF I/O of one
>>>
>>>of
>>>
>>>
>>>>>the
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>other RME HDSP 9652's and set up as an insert or send effect as
>>>>>
>>>>>needed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Lexicon PC90 (Core 32 system ADAT I/O) is routed to the ADAT I/O
>>>
>>>of
>>>
>>>
>>>>>the
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>RME

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	PC purchase
Next Topic:	swap file on paris audio drive ?

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri May 08 22:39:37 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.11315 seconds