Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » AMD XP 3200
|
|
| Re: AMD XP 3200 [message #55990 is a reply to message #55982] |
Sun, 17 July 2005 17:23   |
justcron
Messages: 330
Registered: May 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ced for quite a while that the dwindling
>number pirates has had a direct bearing on something or another. It's nice
>that this has finally been definitively pinned down.
>
>It's all starting to make some sense now. Thanks goodness for the internet.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Personally, I made myself a nice creamy Fettacini pasta last night... mmm,
garlic, mmm, cream, mmm, bacon...
I'm starting to beleive this pasta God thing. ;o)
"mike claytor" <claytror@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>yea, verily....
>
>I have been touched by his noodly appendage.
>
>...and it was good.Global warming is probably killing the pirates and we need to do something
about this.
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:43125a35$1@linux...
>
>
> LOL! Now THAT's funny. The pirates bit is espeically good. :o)
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >Though I have personally never had a problem with reconciling the theory
> of
> >evolution with the idea that there is a creative universal
force/diety/God,
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: AMD XP 3200 [message #56005 is a reply to message #55996] |
Sun, 17 July 2005 22:35 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> >> >>> >7. That makes me happy as opposed to using UAD1
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >Regards,
> >> >>> >Dimitrios
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>took the smart money way out...and a steady job.
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:05:17 -0400, John <no@no.com> wrote:
>A long time ago I heard there were family health issues but have not
>heard a peep. Anyone know how this fine man and family is doing ?
>
>JohnNo doubt. I'm sure it's a GREAT job. That is the largest church in the US
and with their budget I'm sure he's sitting pretty. From what I gather he
is over the Media department. They have full Television studios and release
CDs all the time of their music. I'm sure he's busy. :)
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pmo6h15b8s5c7ahe7d1u7uaon6vtr9h5cp@4ax.com...
> took the smart money way out...and a steady job.
>
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:05:17 -0400, John <no@no.com> wrote:
>
>>A long time ago I heard there were family health issues but have not
>>heard a peep. Anyone know how this fine man and family is doing ?
>>
>>John
>I know you were a bit down on UAD but how did the Senderella work for this?
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>Regarding lookahead.
>How do you compensate ?
>Say you have 7 ms lookahead, you nudge 7 times 1ms to the left or one 5ms
>and two 1ms ?
>Is this the same ?
>I read that 1ms is 80 samples but 5 ms is not 5x80=4000 but instead 240
!!
>What do you do ?
>Dimitrios
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.r.com> wrote in message
>news:43134d1c$1@linux...
>>
>> every eds effect (compressor, gate, etc) has 2 samples of latency, and
the
>> aux's have 2 samples also, so you would be correct with 4 samples,
>assuming
>> no look ahead.
>> Rod
>> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>> >One correction, here it goes again...
>> >I was having already btwo instances of compression open with lookahead
so
|
|
|
|
| Re: AMD XP 3200 [message #56010 is a reply to message #56005] |
Mon, 18 July 2005 02:53 |
rick
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ews:fnk6h1hj1hvb66jdtiqoire5i7sf0euvi2@4ax.com...
>> have the talent bring in a drive for their stuff.
>>
>> On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:24:16 -0500, "Aaron Allen"
>> <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>
>>>Not in my Paris box alone, but I'd be willing to bet I have at least that
>>>amongst my PC's. Worst part is how do you back up that much info?
>>>
>>>AA
>>>
>>>
>>>"Mike R." <nope@nope> wrote in message news:4313180f$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> How about .5 terrabyte? Some in, some out of the box.
>>>> I remember when a producer friend of mine got one of the early Macs,
had
>>>> a whopping megabyte on the HD. We both thought, "man, you'd never fill
>>>> that
>>>> up." When will the madness stop!!;-)
>>>> MR
>>>>
>>>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I've just bought these 2 x 250Gig drives. Plus my old 120Gig is still
in
>>>>>the box, in addition to my old old 27Gig... all up that's... err...
>>>> 647Gig!
>>>>>
>>>>>Surely somebody here has a terrabyte in their Paris box? :o)
>>>>>
>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>Kim.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>No insults. Check your facts before posting.
If your belief in Darwin is based on facts and evidence, then it is
open to questioning by facts and evidence. If it is based upon
a faith that cannot be questioned (i.e. Darwinism) then is it indeed
belief and is a religion, not science.
So, if you believe Darwin is right, then you have no problem with
looking at evidence right?
But if my questioning Darwin is insulting people, do you have a
religion. Looks to me like you do.
Either way, no one was insulted, at least not by me.
DC
"uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>You started with the insults, Don. It is Don, right? I'm sorry if I'm
>mistaken....
>
>I vote we refrain from from any further rabid little partisan jabs.
>
>You used a jokey, silly post by one of the best-natured members of this
>forum to deride a very large group of humans who do not share your belief
>system. That is inappropriate behavior, at best, given the very specific
>nature of this forum, and especially given the general good nature of those
>who post here.
>
>Jimmy
>
>
>"DC" <dc@sayitaintso.org> wrote in message news:4313485e$1@linux...
>>
>> "Gary Flanigan" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: AMD XP 3200 [message #56015 is a reply to message #55982] |
Mon, 18 July 2005 07:33 |
Jeremy Luzier
Messages: 102
Registered: November 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
; >> Taliban.
> >>
> >>
> >> Simply not the case my friend.
> >>
> >> Insults will not make the challenge to Darwin go away.
> >>
> >> DC
> >>
> >
> >
>Did he sell his studio/house in TN? Sure was a nice place.
James
John <no@no.com> wrote:
>A long time ago I heard there were family health issues but have not
>heard a peep. Anyone know how this fine man and family is doing ?
>
>John"uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>You love to fight, don't you? You've done so many times before on this
>newsgroup, if I recall correctly.
It seems as if you cannot abide any disagreements with you?
>You stated that the famous, though somewhat deranged, atheist Madalyn Murray
>basically got what she deserved, that her ignominious end was only to be
>expected given her belief system, or lack thereof. You were clearly implying
>that anybody who doesn't believe in your god is courting such a sad fate.
Nope. My uncle, who knew her said she was not deranged. Yet,
when one makes the self the center of all morality, denying that
it can come from without, one is likely to find another who agrees,
and would like to take their money. do you deny this?
>That is insulting, not only to the many people who don't share your
>self-righteous religious beliefs, but also to any sensible person's sense
of
>social propriety.
Sorry you see it that way.
>Just chill out. It's okay to do so! It won't hurt you a bit, really! Doug
>posted a very funny little link that some of us laughed at. There's no need
>for any proselytizing...
No proselytizing. Doug and I were discussing issues related to
his point. If you don't enjoy the discussion, why don't you just skip
over those posts? Does this issue bring up things you wouold
rather not think about? If so, just leave these ones unread.
>...or for insults, whether you have the intestinal fortitude to to admit
to
>them or not.
No insults. Some folks hold to Darwin like a religion. It is
undeniable, and compared to calling O'Hair deranged is pretty
mild conversation I would say.
DC
>"DC" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: AMD XP 3200 [message #56017 is a reply to message #56015] |
Mon, 18 July 2005 07:29 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
rsial, too. The 18th-century
> > clergyman William Paley likened living things to a watch, arguing that
> > the workings of both point to intelligent design. Modern Darwinists
> > disagree with Paley that the perceived design is real, but they do
> > agree that life overwhelms us with the appearance of design.
> >
> > For example, Francis Crick, co-discoverer of the structure of DNA,
> > once wrote that biologists must constantly remind themselves that
> > what they see was not designed but evolved. (Imagine a scientist
> > repeating through clenched teeth: "It wasn't really designed. Not
> > really.")
> >
> > The resemblance of parts of life to engineered mechanisms like a
> > watch is enormously stronger than what Reverend Paley imagined. In
> > the past 50 years modern science has shown that the cell, the very
> > foundation of life, is run by machines made of molecules. There are
> > little molecular trucks in the cell to ferry supplies, little outboard
> > motors to push a cell through liquid.
> >
> > In 1998 an issue of the journal Cell was devoted to molecular
> > machines, with articles like "The Cell as a Collection of Protein
> > Machines" and "Mechanical Devices of the Spliceosome: Motors,
> > Clocks, Springs and Things." Referring to his student days in the
> > 1960's, Bruce Alberts, president of the National Academy of
> > Sciences, wrote that "the chemistry that makes life possible is much
> > more elaborate and sophisticated than anything we students had
> > ever considered." In fact, Dr. Alberts remarked, the entire cell can be
> > viewed as a factory with an elaborate network of interlocking
> > assembly lines, each of which is composed of a set of large protein
> > machines. He emphasized that the term machine was not some
> > fuzzy analogy; it was meant literally.
> >
> > The next claim in the argument for design is that we have no good
> > explanation for the foundation of life that doesn't involve
> > intelligence. Here is where thoughtful people part company.
> > Darwinists assert that their theory can explain the appearance of
> > design in life as the result of random mutation and natural selection
> > acting over immense stretches of time. Some scientists, however,
> > think the Darwinists' confidence is unjustified. They note that
> > although natural selection can explain some aspects of biology,
> > there are no research studies indicating that Darwinian processes
> > can make molecular machines of the complexity we find in the cell.
> >
> > Scientists skeptical of Darwinian claims include many who have no
> > truck with ideas of intelligent design, like those who advocate an
> > idea called complexity theory, which envisions life self-organizing in
> > roughly the same way that a hurricane does, and ones who think
> > organisms in some sense can design themselves.
> >
> > The fourth claim in the design argument is also controversial: in the
> > a
|
|
|
|
| Re: AMD XP 3200 [message #56018 is a reply to message #56015] |
Mon, 18 July 2005 07:31 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
bsence of any convincing non-design explanation, we are justified in
> > thinking that real intelligent design was involved in life. To evaluate
> > this claim, it's important to keep in mind that it is the profound
> > appearance of design in life that everyone is laboring to explain, not
> > the appearance of natural selection or the appearance of
> > self-organization.
> >
> > The strong appearance of design allows a disarmingly simple
> > argument: if it looks, walks and quacks like a duck, then, absent
> > compelling evidence to the contrary, we have warrant to conclude
> > it's a duck. Design should not be overlooked simply because it's so
> > obvious.
> >
> > Still, some critics claim that science by definition can't accept
> > design, while others argue that science should keep looking for
> > another explanation in case one is out there. But we can't settle
> > questions about reality with definitions, nor does it seem useful to
> > search relentlessly for a non-design explanation of Mount Rushmore.
> > Besides, whatever special restrictions scientists adopt for
> > themselves don't bind the public, which polls show, overwhelmingly,
> > and sensibly, thinks that life was designed. And so do many
> > scientists who see roles for both the messiness of evolution and the
> > elegance of design.
> >
> >
> > Michael J. Behe, a professor of biological sciences at Lehigh
> > University and a senior fellow with the Discovery Institute's Center
> > for Science and Culture, is the author of "Darwin's Black Box: The
> > Biochemical Challenge to Evolution."
>
>You can fry and eat 'em both. Many folks have, many will again...
Jimmy
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
>
> They're gonna be wrangling gators and snakes in the French Quarter
tomorrow.I used to live in Hammond Louisiana and have partaken of both snake and
gator, garnished with shrimp with a remoulade made from Heinz ketchup, a
small dollop of mayonaise and a larger dollop of freshly ground horseradish
and black pepper, subsequently washed down with homemade strawberry wine.
Sometimes I miss living in Louisiana. It was a fun place to live and to eat,
though I don't think I drew a sober breath the entire time I was living
there. Didn't seem to matter too much. No one else there was sober either.
;o)
"uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:4313c79b$1@linux...
> You can fry and eat 'em both. Many folks have, many will again...
>
>
> Jimmy
>
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
>
> >
> > They're gonna be wrangling gators and snakes in the French Quarter
> tomorrow.
>
>
>Here are some notes I copied (I have these stored as sampleslide presets)
on lookahead makeup values
1. EDS effect. 1ms back and 78 samples forward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu May 28 17:26:26 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.36173 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
