Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Interesting Daniel Weiss Interview
| Interesting Daniel Weiss Interview [message #77147] |
Sun, 17 December 2006 11:15 |
emarenot
Messages: 345
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have a bunch of Roland and Kurzweil =
>CDRs that I=20
>was hoping to</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>install into Kontakt. The Rolands =
>are missing=20
>the data that creates</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>the mapping on many. The =
>Kurzweils have loop=20
>point issues (feeding back!)</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>along </FONT><FONT face=3DArial =
>size=3D2>with layers=20
>not always showing up.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I want to think cdXtract 4.1 will do a
=
>better job=20
>but they haven't retuned</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>my multiple emails to tech support and
=
>sales. =20
>Anyone like the program?</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Should I spring for the $139 just to =
>see if it=20
>works? </FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>What would you do? $139 would get =
>me another=20
>sample disk in Kontakt format . . .</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
>and=20
>you?<BR><A=20
>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>Hey Paul - If you truned up at Bare Bones, I'm sorry I missed you. The guy
who booked us quit and the new manager didn't know what the schedule he'd
set up was, so she booked another band. I took advantage of the opportunity
to get to bed long before 3 AM andget a good night's sleep!
Call me so we can hook up!
ganttI first heard his stuff when the band I played with back in the '70's learned
a bunch of tunes by Dreams. What a band! Major unhappiness...
Gantt
"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>
>Even when you know it's coming, it's very sad...
>
>http://abcn
|
|
|
|
| Re: Interesting Daniel Weiss Interview [message #77148 is a reply to message #77147] |
Sun, 17 December 2006 09:26  |
Nil
Messages: 245
Registered: March 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=2793408Dedric,
Why are you selling? I know tthat there any alot of "new" kids on the plugin
block, But, as a package, the waves Gold Bundle is the only package in-which
I can mix an album project with.
Yes, I know they don;t have the emulation or the hip interfaces, but Ren
Comp, Ren Eq, Delay,L1,c1,etc still get's the job done better (imo) than
some of these plugins that try to mimic 'old"
studio gear.
I also, like the fact that the waves plugs(other than their SSL plugs) don't
stamp a signature sound. They pretty much leave he track "Nuetral", but you
can hear and feel it working.
All in all, I love Waves Plugins. They works and they don;t "suck up" valuble
CPU power. I know these days, is "fashoinable " to say that Waves plugs are
not happening. With plugs like URS, Sonalkis, UAD, and other vintage plugins.
Still, to my ears, Wave plugs just work and get's the job done.
Take care
Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>I'm thinking of selling my Waves Gold Bundle (v3) - anyone done this?
>
>I don't have my login with me to contact their tech support (grr). Does
>Waves have a process for transferring the license?
>
>Anyone interested? Native version. No WUP.
>
>Thanks,
>Dedric
>Hi Lamont,
I don't use them. v3 VST doesn't work with Nuendo 3 and I didn't want to
pay for the WUP plan just to get a compatible version. I also moved away
from using them a few years ago - not the sound I wanted - a bit veiled -
esp. the Ren series. They do work and are good plugins but not what I go to
on a daily basis - I have other goto choices for every plugin in the bundle.
Just no point in letting them sit there when someone else might use them
more, and/or would want to use them to upgrade to v5 or Platinum.
I had considered keeping them and upgrading, but I just can't justify it for
what I am doing and how little I would use them.
Regards,
Dedric
On 1/14/07 9:26 AM, in article 45aa4b9d$1@linux, "LaMont"
<jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
> Dedric,
>
> Why are you selling? I know tthat there any alot of "new" kids on the plugin
> block, But, as a package, the waves Gold Bundle is the only package in-which
> I can mix an album project with.
>
> Yes, I know they don;t have the emulation or the hip interfaces, but Ren
> Comp, Ren Eq, Delay,L1,c1,etc still get's the job done better (imo) than
> some of these plugins that try to mimic 'old"
> studio gear.
> I also, like the fact that the waves plugs(other than their SSL plugs) don't
> stamp a signature sound. They pretty much leave he track "Nuetral", but you
> can hear and feel it working.
>
> All in all, I love Waves Plugins. They works and they don;t "suck up" valuble
> CPU power. I know these days, is "fashoinable " to say that Waves plugs are
> not happening. With plugs like URS, Sonalkis, UAD, and other vintage plugins.
>
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun May 24 10:12:24 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.17914 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
