Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OT: WinXP weirdness
| OT: WinXP weirdness [message #64543] |
Tue, 14 February 2006 19:54  |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
n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|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: WinXP weirdness [message #64558 is a reply to message #64548] |
Wed, 15 February 2006 07:12  |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>
>10-4 on that
"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>
>
>Also if rendering from the editor window, the name at the bottom of the
channel
>can't have symbols in it. IE OH/L is no good.
>
>
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>Rendering is very reliable for me. I use it all the time. Like Don said,
>make
>>sure there are no (small) spaces between your edits.
>>As for stereo rendering of native plugs, it dkoesn't work in the normal
>editor,
>>you have to use the destructive editor. Set up your steroe effect like
you
>>like it, name and save the setting, double click one of the 2 files you
>want
>>to render. When the destructive editor pops up, that file will be shown
>in
>>the window and ALSO hilighted in the audio bin of the new editor. Shift
>the
>>other file, so that both files you want are hilighted, they will be next
>>to each other, assuming they're both named the same with L and R. Drag
bothe
>>files into the editor. You will see bothe wave forms. Under "DSP" select
>>Plugins, select your plug, select the preset you named, and render. There
>>will be some number crunching going on, so depending on the plug, it may
>>take a little longer than you think. When it gets done, close the editor
>>and your stereo track will be rendered.
>>Important, always work on copies as the destructive editor can
>>t be undone once you close it. I render each track first in the normal
editor
>>and put the originals in a jail, or if I have unused tracks, I'll put them
>>there and mute thim.
>>This is really a lot more simple in practice than it looks like here.
>>Rod
>>"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>>>No automation on EDS FX
>>>
>>>When rendering make sure any cross fades are equal...no space between
edits
>>
>>>if possible. Best way is to record an empty track then copy and move the
>>
>>>track you want rendered onto the empty track, this will clean up your
edits.
>>>
>>>Then move your original track into a jail for safe keeping and move the
>>new
>>>and improved track to the channel with your plugin's and render away
>>>
>>>As for rendering a stereo pair I'll let others chime in as I've never
tried
>>
>>>it
>>>
>>>Don
>>>
>>>"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:4427daf0$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> First, Automation does not work for EDS EQs right?
>>>>
>>>> Second, Does Rendering (selection or track) with Native effects work
>>
>>>> reliably
>>>> for you? I crash a lot with this really really needed feature. And
>god
>>>> forbid I try to render a stereo pair with stereo native effects across
>>
>>>> them.
>>>> Make it stop crashing please!
>>>
>>>
>>You guys know way too
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: WinXP weirdness [message #64559 is a reply to message #64543] |
Wed, 15 February 2006 08:29 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
much!! Thanks !
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>Rendering is very reliable for me. I use it all the time. Like Don said,
make
>sure there are no (small) spaces between your edits.
>As for stereo rendering of native plugs, it dkoesn't work in the normal
editor,
>you have to use the destructive editor. Set up your steroe effect like you
>like it, name and save the setting, double click one of the 2 files you
want
>to render. When the destructive editor pops up, that file will be shown
in
>the window and ALSO hilighted in the audio bin of the new editor. Shift
the
>other file, so that both files you want are hilighted, they will be next
>to each other, assuming they're both named the same with L and R. Drag bothe
>files into the editor. You will see bothe wave forms. Under "DSP" select
>Plugins, select your plug, select the preset you named, and render. There
>will be some number crunching going on, so depending on the plug, it may
>take a little longer than you think. When it gets done, close the editor
>and your stereo track will be rendered.
>Important, always work on copies as the destructive editor can
>t be undone once you close it. I render each track first in the normal editor
>and put the originals in a jail, or if I have unused tracks, I'll put them
>there and mute thim.
>This is really a lot more simple in practice than it looks like here.
>Rod
>"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>>No automation on EDS FX
>>
>>When rendering make sure any cross fades are equal...no space between edits
>
>>if possible. Best way is to record an empty track then copy and move the
>
>>track you want rendered onto the empty track, this will clean up your edits.
>>
>>Then move your original track into a jail for safe keeping and move the
>new
>>and improved track to the channel with your plugin's and render away
>>
>>As for rendering a stereo pair I'll let others chime in as I've never tried
>
>>it
>>
>>Don
>>
>>"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:4427daf0$1@linux...
>>>
>>> First, Automation does not work for EDS EQs right?
>>>
>>> Second, Does Rendering (selection or track) with Native effects work
>
>>> reliably
>>> for you?
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: WinXP weirdness [message #64560 is a reply to message #64559] |
Wed, 15 February 2006 08:32 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I crash a lot with this really really needed feature. And
god
>>> forbid I try to render a stereo pair with stereo native effects across
>
>>> them.
>>> Make it stop crashing please!
>>
>>
>should have seen my mistakes before I got it right
;-)
Don
"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:44281a10$1@linux...
>
> You guys know way too much!! Thanks !
>
> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>Rendering is very reliable for me. I use it all the time. Like Don said,
> make
>>sure there are no (small) spaces between your edits.
>>As for stereo rendering of native plugs, it dkoesn't work in the normal
> editor,
>>you have to use the destructive editor. Set up your steroe effect like you
>>like it, name and save the setting, double click one of the 2 files you
> want
>>to render. When the destructive editor pops up, that file will be shown
> in
>>the window and ALSO hilighted in the audio bin of the new editor. Shift
> the
>>other file, so that both files you want are hilighted, they will be next
>>to each other, assuming they're both named the same with L and R. Drag
>>bothe
>>files into the editor. You will see bothe wave forms. Under "DSP" select
>>Plugins, select your plug, select the preset you named, and render. There
>>will be some number crunching going on, so depending on the plug, it may
>>take a little longer than you think. When it gets done, close the editor
>>and your stereo track will be rendered.
>>Important, always work on copies as the destructive editor can
>>t be undone once you close it. I render each track first in the normal
>>editor
>>and put the originals in a jail, or if I have unused tracks, I'll put them
>>there and mute thim.
>>This is really a lot more simple in practice than it looks like here.
>>Rod
>>"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>>>No automation on EDS FX
>>>
>>>When rendering make sure any cross fades are equal...no space between
>>>edits
>>
>>>if possible. Best way is to record an empty track then copy and move the
>>
>>>track you want rendered onto the empty track, this will clean up your
>>>edits.
>>>
>>>Then move your original track into a jail for safe keeping and move the
>>new
>>>and improved track to the channel with your plugin's and render away
>>>
>>>As for rendering a stereo pair I'll let others chime in as I've never
>>>tried
>>
>>>it
>>>
>>>Don
>>>
>>>"John" <no@no.com>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: WinXP weirdness [message #64691 is a reply to message #64558] |
Sun, 19 February 2006 19:17 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;>>>>up. Though I've never meant many of the people I talk with here, I
>>>>>>have
>>>>>a
>>>>>>definite sense that they are my friends and many times the banter
>>>>>>tends
>>>>>to
>>>>>>be jovial. Don't get me wrong, everyone here can and will be helpful
>>with
>>>>>
>>>>>>PARIS questions, but if you are looking for strictly technical
>>>>>>support,
>>>>>you
>>>>>>will be disappointed with much of the "fluff" we engage in. With some
>>>>>>patience, there is a phenomenal amount of collective brain power here
>>to
>>>>>be
>>>>>>tapped. This includes all areas of recording, not just PARIS related.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There are a million things I don't know about Macs and PARIS, but if
>>you
>>>>>
>>>>>>ever want to bounce a question my way, feel free to give me a call.
>>>>>>515-233-3191. I have a day gig, so call in the evening CST if I'll
>>>>>>need
>>>>>to
>>>>>>be at my rig. I might not have a quick answer for you, but I'll be
>>>>>>glad
>>>>>to
>>>>>>do what I can to help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tony
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:442953df$1@linux...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK..... I am taking in all that all of you are saying. It appears
> that
>>>>>you
>>>>>>> feel it is I that have offended you (Tony). Alright... you have a
>>>>>>> community
>>>>>>> of folks here and I rather new to the forum have posted something
> that
>>>>>
>>>>>>> struck
>>>>>>> a nerve. Tony I appologize.
>>>>>>> Aside from the VST issue, I will tell you what set me off. I was
>>>>>>> refered
>>>>>>> to this site, told just what you guys are all saying here, about all
>>>> the
>>>>>>> old pros of the Paris n'all..... Great!! so I started checking it
> out
>>>>>and
>>>>>>> see what gets covered on the forum. Daily (for a while) I would
>>>>>>> check
>>>>>it.
>>>>>>> Never saw anything remotely mentioned about the Paris. In fact, type
>>>> in
>>>>>
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> word Paris in the search engine. Know what you'll find? Now don't
> quote
>>>>>
>>>>>>> me,
>>>>>>> but I think there is a couple entries. Type in "installing VST
>>>>>>> pluggins"
>>>>>>> The point I am myphed about is,90% is every other software,
>>>>>>> relatives,
>>>>>
>>>>>>> garage
>>>>>>> sales, and my favorite, crafty ways to swear on the web. The only
> way
>>>>>I
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> ever gotten help, was if I e-mailed someone and asked if I may call
>>
>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>> THEN! I got help. Know why?? Because now you would be accountable
> to
>>>> act
>>>>>>> professional. Don, in regard to "cut us some slack" and "we're not
>>>>>>> psychics
>>>>>>> here" Point well taken. That's constructive, and calls me to act
>>>>>>> more
>>>>>
>>>>>>> professional.
>>>>>>> In regard to "get thicker skined" well... point taken but, I don't
>>come
>>>>>to
>>>>>>> the forum to screw around, tell jokes with cute little ways of how
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: WinXP weirdness [message #65374 is a reply to message #64691] |
Mon, 13 March 2006 21:13 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t; >> Is paris spdif coax or =
optical?<BR>>=20
> >> TIA<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>>=20
><BR>><BR>><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE> </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0184_01C65E85.80B1E000--This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_002B_01C65E95.2FF48590
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Edna,
Yes exactly.
Tom
"Edna" <edna@texomaonline.com> wrote in message news:443dcf9e@linux...
I see, I guess. If it happened that one only had optical and the =
other only coax I would then need the adaptor. =20
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:443dc7e0$1@linux...
Same data as far as I know. Different connector!
"Edna" <edna@texomaonline.com> wrote in message =
news:443db406@linux...
What would be the advantage with the optical? Im going to spdif =
from Emu
1212m to Paris. The emu card has coax and optical.
Thanks, E
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
news:443d43c2$1@linux...
> I use an M-Audio C02 to convert coax to optical. Works great.
>
>
> "fred" <fred@reborn.com> wrote in message =
news:443c012a$1@linux...
> >
> > Any particular brands you would recommend? Saw a number of =
them on ebay
> pretty
> > cheap, but not sure how good they need to be.
> > Thanks again
> >
> > "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> > >coax
> > >
> > >"Fred" <fred@reborn.com> wrote in message =
news:443bf3e5$1@linux...
> > >>
> > >> Is paris spdif coax or optical?
> > >> TIA
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
------=_NextPart_000_002B_01C65E95.2FF48590
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Edna,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Yes exactly.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Edna" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:edna@texomaonline.com">edna@texomaonline.com</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A =
href=3D"news:443dcf9e@linux">news:443dcf9e@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I see, I guess. If it happened =
that one=20
only had optical and the other only coax I would then need the =
adaptor. =20
</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A =
href=3D"news:443dc7e0$1@linux">news:443dc7e0$1@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Same data as far as I know. =
Different=20
connector!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Edna" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:edna@texomaonline.com">edna@texomaonline.com</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A =
href=3D"news:443db406@linux">news:443db406@linux</A>...</DIV>What=20
would be the advantage with the optical? Im going to spdif =
from=20
Emu<BR>1212m to Paris. The
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Jun 02 04:42:08 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05063 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
