|
|
| Re: Focusrite Sapphire? [message #80580 is a reply to message #80577] |
Fri, 23 February 2007 18:28   |
Chris Ludwig
 Messages: 868 Registered: May 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
recording,
>> editing and mixing in Logic Pro is as good and in some cases better than
>
>> PARIS, from a capabilities and interface standpoint.
>>
>> For example, free form isn't a separate "mode" in Logic, you can use a
>> similar feature for multiple comp takes at any time.
>>
>> Logic lets you record as many tracks as your system can handle. Editing
>
>> in the Arrange window is similar to PARIS, drag the end handles; cut
>> with a scissors; add crossfades. You can draw or record automation data;
>
>> group tracks to automate together; automate every parameter including EQ
>
>> and plugins. You can have TONS of signal processing plugins. The
>> included ones are very good and you can run third party Audio Units.
>>
>> The MIDI integration is way beyond PARIS...it actually works. Soft synth
>
>> support (again, automatable) is great. The included soft synths are
>> excellent and again you can add third party Audio Units.
>>
>> So there's no way I'd agree that it "sucks" for recording, editing and
>> mixing. It works pretty well, actually. What is it that gives you that
>> opinion, LaMont? What is the "hardcore" part that you feel is missing?
>>
>> Cheers,
&g
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Focusrite Sapphire? [message #80699 is a reply to message #80629] |
Sun, 25 February 2007 19:05  |
Tony Benson
 Messages: 453 Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
w9NDE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---=_linux46186f4a--I'll post plenty of clips soon. This amp will be getting a _major_ workout
in the upcoming Mold Monkies tracking sessions. I'm not exactly sure how.
Live it will be part of a two amp rig, but recording I might choose one or
the other depending on the part. But I'll get y'all sounds, it's pretty special.
TCB
"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>yes, post some clps, dammit!!!
>
>Or if you don't have a place to post 'em, e'mail them to me &
>I'l serve 'em up for a reasonable amount of time like I did
>with Brandon's drum thingies.
>
>Neil
>
>
>t> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Thad,
>>Post a clip of this monster! Sounds great by your description
>>but you are a good writer by nature! I'd love to hear it being an
>>AC-30 lover from way back.
>>
>>I still use your Cubase 2 book too.
>>Tom
>>
>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:46180a12$1@linux...
>>
>> OK y'all, since I know there are a few guitar heads out there. As most
>=
>>of
>> you know, I'm very much into the fancy new stuff when it comes to my
=
>>music.
>> I'm into hip hop, breakbeats, dub step, software synths, and all of =
>>that.
>> But, after I pop in the phone booth and emerge as my alter ego, I also
>=
>>play
>> geetar in a rock'n'roll band. With guitar gear I'm positively Holocene
>=
>>in
>> my tastes. For almost ten years I've played the same amp, a Top Hat =
>>Club
>> Royale, basically an AC-30 top boost knockoff preamp with an AC-15 =
>>power
>> section. I've usually put a power soak on it and played it full out.=20
>>
>> So, today I finally had a chance to really try out the Savage that a
=
>>friend
>> is selling. In my not so humble opinion I think I've always had some
=
>>of the
>> best guitar tone I've ever heard. More than once someone has offered
=
>>to buy
>> my Top Hat from me on the spot. The Savage is AT LEAST as good as the
>=
>>Top
>> Hat. And, more importantly, the most stunning example of class A 6V6
=
>>amplification
>> I have heard this side of a lovingly restored tweed Deluxe owned by =
>>another
>> friend. It doesn't do clean at a level that would be useful outside a
>=
>>studio
>> (though it's clean tones are spectacular, I think it would make a =
>>superb
>> Grant Green sounding jazz amp), but the breakup goes from gorgeous =
>>Deluxe
>> to surprisingly Marshall sounding when dimed.=20
>>
>> A lot of amp makers blackball their one really low wattage model with
>=
>>a crappy
>> sounding eight inch speaker and a sub par cabinet, I think because =
>>it's just
>> harder to justify a high price tag on a low watt amp. It shouldn't be
>=
>>that
>> way, but in the very masculine 'size matters' world of guitar players
>=
>>the
>> 6 or 10 watt amp should be cheap. Mad props to Savage for doing things
>=
>>right
>> with the Macht series, which is a dream for those (like me) who love
=
>>power
>> amp grit over everything else.=20
>>
>> I'm running them parallel now and it's SICK how good they sound. Not
=
>>sure
>> how I'll mic them for recording but I'm able to back off on the crunch
>=
>>coming
>> from the Top Hat and get more grind from the Savage, letting each amp
>=
>>do
>> what it does best. It's one hell of a roar.=20
>>
>> TCB
>>
>>
&g
|
|
|
|