The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Shure In-Ear Personal Monitor System
Shure In-Ear Personal Monitor System [message #80290] Sun, 18 February 2007 16:25 Go to next message
Ed is currently offline  Ed   JAPAN
Messages: 199
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
l" target="_blank">http://www.radikaltechnologies.com/index.html

James

"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>Has anyone tried one of these? I'm about to drop a lot more money on a moving
>fader control box. A lot more.
>
>TCB
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>; ) Next they will have fruit flavors!
>>
>>http://www.behringer.com/BCF2000-WH/index.cfm?lang=eng
>I was planning on buying the Frontier Designs Alfatrack, until I saw the Alesis
MasterControl. The Alesis serves multi purposes, including 16ch. Adat interface.
I may also buy a Alfatrack. It's only $200.00 street, and it's small.

http://www.frontierdesign.com/

"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>
Re: Shure In-Ear Personal Monitor System [message #80304 is a reply to message #80290] Sun, 18 February 2007 21:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
audioguy_editout_ is currently offline  audioguy_editout_   CANADA
Messages: 249
Registered: December 2005
Senior Member
t; wrote in message
>>>> news:460b3fd0$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>> curry our horses last weekend

In India, would that be considered sacrilege? I understand the spices would
probably make it more palatable at least.

AA


"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote in message news:460d1ba1@linux...
> It stopped yesterday afternoon and all melted. We've got 4" on the ground
> this morning and it's still snowing hard, and I mean like as in a January
> snowfall. I'm glad we didn't curry our horses last weekend. That removes
> their winter undercoat and they're needing it today. I had a feeling it
> would be a good thing to wait. I was right. They're out in the pasture
> right now looking around wondering where all the green grass is that they
> were munchin' on yesterday.
>
> Time to go throw some hay at these guys
> ;o)
>
>
>
> "John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote in message
Re: Shure In-Ear Personal Monitor System [message #80305 is a reply to message #80304] Sun, 18 February 2007 22:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ed is currently offline  Ed   JAPAN
Messages: 199
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
> news:460cc696$1@linux...
>>
>> Looks like I picked a good week to go to Phoenix
>> to watch spring training baseball (my 8 year old son
>> is a big Texas Rangers fan--he caught a fly ball on
>> Monday and got Sammy Sosa to sign it yesterday)...
>>
>>
>>
>> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>>....and the Purgatory ski resort about two weeks ago. The flakes are so
>> big
>>>today they look like popcorn falling from the sky and all the trees and
>>
>>>flowers are starting to bloom out while this is going on.
>>>
>>>What an amazing show.
>>>
>>>;o)
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>Yeah dude. Call it a 'sound' investment :)
AA


"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote in message news:460d4030@linux...
> Just roll the price of the cards into the financing.....and surely your
> home repairs will also need a DW Fearn preamp and and a Telefunlen U47 in
> order to be complet4ed properly.
>
> ;o)
>
> "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:460d29f8$1@linux...
>> If I could I would...in a heartbeat but unfortunately we have some major
>> house expenses coming up that will require the temporary maxing out of
>> the cards in the event financing of said expenses gets held up....now
>> should the financing come through and your card is still available I'm
>> sure we can work out a amicable arrangement i.e. I give you cash, you
>> give me card(s)
>>
>> :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> "Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:460d260a$
Re: Shure In-Ear Personal Monitor System [message #80334 is a reply to message #80290] Mon, 19 February 2007 11:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Tony Benson is currently offline  Tony Benson   UNITED STATES
Messages: 453
Registered: June 2006
Senior Member
of all, this
slick little film was written and directed by well-known
anti-environmentalist Martin Durkin, who is in trouble now with some of the
experts he used in the film for misrepresenting them by editing their
sequences.

The most amusing part of this was his answer to the "better safe than
sorry" approach -- that if by fighting global warming we doom the Third
World to poverty by preventing development. AS IF the
anti-environmentalists and the corporations funding the global warming
denyers give a flying f*** about people in the Third World for anything
other than another market to exploit. Yes, we all know that without the
burning of fossil fuels, there is no possibility of progress. Gimme a
friggin' break.

Greed kills, people. Follow the money.

Sarah

"Bill Lorentzen" <bill@lorentzen.ws> wrote in message news:460ec4f9@linux...
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6IPHmJWmDk&mode=related& amp;search=
>
> It's a British documentary showing another viewpoint about global warming
> and CO2. It's a viewpoint that is different from that of the man who
> invented the internet...
>Oh, and by the way, here's some detail.
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/climate_change/art icle2326210.ece

S


"Bill Lorentzen" <bill@lorentzen.ws> wrote in message news:460ec4f9@linux...
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6IPHmJWmDk&mode=related& amp;search=
>
> It's a British documentary showing another viewpoint about global warming
> and CO2. It's a viewpoint that is different from that of the man who
> invented the internet...
>Don Nafe wrote:
> I'm not about to get into an argument about Global warming...but I do
> remember my Grade 10 science and the chemical make up of the atmosphere and
> from that perspective alone Global Warming being caused by CO2 doesn't make
> any sense and it makes even less sense when you use the numbers the IPCC
> uses to prove that CO2 emmissions are the cause...bad science...plain and
> simple.

Cool. This makes me think of three things:

1) Memes in our vocabulary.
2) Following the money.
3) Examining the scientific consensus.


MEMES

Phrases like "bad science" and "junk science" are often used by PR
flacks paid by fossil fuel lobbies. Previously those sorts of phrases
were used by PR flacks paid by tobacco lobbies. It's an interesting
connection...

From: http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/denialmachine/index.html

******
"Who is keeping the debate of global warming alive?
The documentary shows how fossil fuel corporation
Re: Shure In-Ear Personal Monitor System [message #80384 is a reply to message #80334] Tue, 20 February 2007 13:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ed is currently offline  Ed   JAPAN
Messages: 199
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
d both sound right but I can't make sense of it."

TIA,

Regards,

Mic.Form SR copyrights the recording itself. To copyright the individual songs,
use PA. You can do both - that's what the language in the SR instructions
is referring to, not that it replaces PA.

Technically a song is copyrighted when written, but for legal safekeeping,
filing the forms is the safest way to go.

You can use form PA to copyright a collection of songs, listing the
collection title and each song title in the collection. Technically that
isn't the same as copyrighting each individual song, but I believe (though
can't guarantee), it may serve the same purpose. A lawyer would be best for
that determination.

Regards,
Dedric

On 4/3/07 8:45 PM, in article 46131161$1@linux, "Mic Cross"
<crzymnmchl@comcast.net> wrote:

>
> A friend is asking:
>
> "If I copyright a CD of 13 songs of mine, do I use form SR or PA? I've been
> reading both and both sound right but I can't make sense of it."
>
> TIA,
>
> Regards,
>
> Mic.Courtesy of The Turtles...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JHN5HaUg28Thanks Dedric!

Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>Form SR copyrights the recording itself. To copyright the individual songs,
>use PA. You can do both - that's what the language in the SR instructions
>is referring to, not that it replaces PA.
>
>Technically a song is copyrighted when written, but for legal safekeeping,
>filing the forms is the safest way to go.
>
>You can use form PA to copyright a collection of songs, listing the
>collection title and each song title in the collection. Technically that
>isn't the same as copyrighting each individual song, but I believe (though
>can't guarantee), it may serve the same purpose. A lawyer would be best
for
>that determination.
>
>Regards,
>Dedric
>
>On 4/3/07 8:45 PM, in article 46131161$1@linux, "Mic Cross"
><crzymnmchl@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> A friend is asking:
>>
>> "If I copyright a CD of 13 songs of mine, do I use form SR or PA? I've
been
>> reading both and both sound right but I can't make sense of it."
>>
>> TIA,
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Mic.
>So sad!

Here's a fun read!

http://negativland.com/albini.html

James

"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>
>Courtesy of The Turtles...
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JHN5HaUg28James, what you're saying here about Apple is not true, as far as I can see
what they're doing many places here in Europe. They will not follow the
guarantee laws in different countries here and is suing their resellers to
pay for the difference, if the guarantee-periode is longer than their own. I
know different resellers in Norway will not sell Apple products anymore just
because of these problems, when reparations over a year have eaten up more
than their whole sellingprofitt on Appleproducts. So the other side of the
Apple name is not as glorious as your believings about the firm;-)

Erling

"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:4612d4f2$1@linux...
>
> TCB
>
> At least Apple doesn't steal from others, and then turn around and sue
> when
Re: Shure In-Ear Personal Monitor System [message #80436 is a reply to message #80384] Wed, 21 February 2007 09:17 Go to previous message
Tony Benson is currently offline  Tony Benson   UNITED STATES
Messages: 453
Registered: June 2006
Senior Member
>>>>>>>attitude, give it a rest.
>>>>>>>>Time to climb down off the Apple high horse and realize that Bill
> Gates
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>isn't Satan, and Steve Jobs isn't Mother Theresa.
>>>>>>>>These are companies making products to make a profit and I believe
> most
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>if
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>not all of us here understand that, other than you apparently.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Why do you have such an all-consuming chip on your shoulder against
>>>
>>> MS?
>>>
>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>don't have a problem with Macs or PCs, MS or Apple, but
>>>>>>>>I'm also not in love with either one - neither is perfect. Are you
>>>
>>> a
>>>
>>>>>Mac
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>reseller by chance?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Start looking at the world around you without the Apple-colored
>>>>>>>>glasses
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>There's more to life, and computer technology
>>>>>>>>than evangelizing the Apple mantra. We aren't buying it and you are
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>only
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>hurting your argument, not
>>>>>>>>that it should be an argument to begin with. Buy and use what you
> like,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>post all you want about Apple products, but leave
>>>>>>>>the crusade offline, please.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>>>>Dedric
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:461539ad$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>This isn't balanced, this is opinion! This is a bashing!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You need to get educated on the real history of MS.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>START READING!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>http://www.albion.com/microsoft/findings-21.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dedric@echomg.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.wired.com/gadgets/mac/commentary/cultofmac/2006/0 1/70072
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Just a little balance of perspective. No conspiracies - just
>>>>>>>>>>different
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>people with
>>>>>>>>>>different personalities and personal goals.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>news:46153119$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>They are just trying to cover up years and years of unethical
>>>>>>>>>>>business
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>practices.
>>>>>>>>>>>They are just trying to get people to think their good guys and
>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>forget
>>>>>>>>>>>what they have done. The truth is still the truth.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"Steve Jobs" <SJ@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>http://im.live.
Previous Topic: Nice computer case
Next Topic: WAAAY OT: Just one little blonde joke
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jun 14 21:12:29 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.10373 seconds