Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die
| Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die [message #78584] |
Thu, 18 January 2007 10:54  |
![Deej [4] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "Deej [4] is currently offline")
Deej [4]
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ac does not exclude them from the "Rules"
>>of DAW applications. You need a separate firewire card. period..
>>
>>DJ, like I stated before, you friend Must take back the Macbook, and get
>>the Mac book pro.. If not, then he's not serious about solving his problem..
>>Take care..
>>
>>
>>"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>>I'm working some more with my musician friend here trying to get his
>>>Mac/Digi 002 based studio configured in a way that's easy for him to use.
>>
>>>Since there are firewire bus limitations on his Macbook (not Macbook Pro),
>>
>>>convolution reverbs are pretty much out of the question, plus he's looking
>>
>>>for something to use during tracking anyway. I'm looking for some
>>>alternatives for him that would allow him to run hardware reverbs and
>>>control them from PTLE.. He is interested in the new Lexicon MX200 which
>>
>>>interfaces via S/Pdif and/or analog (for audio) and USB (for VST capability
>>
>>>and parameter control)and then can be accessed as a VST plugin. This looks
>>
>>>like a pretty cool solution for him maybe. The MX 200 doesn't have the
>
>>>higher end algos that the MX 400 has, but he might want to go with the
>MX
>>
>>>400 which does have increased capabilities................but
>>>anyway.............what I'm going to need is a Mac compatible VST>RTAS
>
>>>wrapper in order for this to work.
>>>
>>>Anyone tried this Lexicon box with a Mac/PTLE?
>>>
>>>Anyone point me to a VST>RTAS wrapper?
>>>
>>>I also need to look into whether or not the optical and coax digital I/O
>>on
>>>the 002 can be used in parallel as a pair of stereo S/Pdif I/O. Anyone
>have
>>
>>>the answer to this one so I won't have to read a bunch of stuff and exercise
>>
>>>my thought processes? ;oD
>>>
>>>Also, doesn't TC Electronics make some kind of box besides the POCO that
>>can
>>>operate as a VST plugin?
>>>
>>>He's more a musician than a techie and probably would be happier staying
>>
>>>that way so I'm going to see if we can get him smilin'.
>>>
>>>thanks,
>>>
>&g
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die [message #78586 is a reply to message #78584] |
Thu, 18 January 2007 11:36  |
Deej [4]
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ted.
Get 1 presonus and 1 8pre. I will connect the presonus to the ADAT
of the 8 pre.
Sound better?
--
Thanks,
Brandon
"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:45d33b7e@linux...
>I like the idea of the 8 pres cause they have phantom power on all 8
>channels.
> Not like the other... Uhh ....Presonus I think.... I forget...... that has
> phantom power on only 4 channels.
> The Motu 8 pre will be my comp sound card as well via firewire.
> It is supposedly supposed to have a 1.6ms latency from analog in to analog
> out. certainly more
> during playback, but we'll see how it works.
> I can daisy chain the two together and I would rather keep it simple at
> first (same hardware)
> for compatibility purposes. I can always switch things around later.
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Brandon
>
>
>
> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:45d33a57$1@linux...
>> Coincidentelly I was going to look at those. Audix i5's.
>> I went on sweetwater and read the reviews for the SM57
>> to get an idea of what other people were comparing them too
>> and the Audix i5 was mentioned.
>> Ok I will pick up some Audixi5's.
>> I may pick up:
>> 1 - Audix i5
>> 1 - Audix D4
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Brandon
>>
>>
>>
>> "Neil" <IUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:45d3365a$1@linux...
>>>
>>> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>>>>wELL i AM dialing back a bit.
>>>
>>> NOOOOOOO! Spend all you have, and THEN SOME... it's the ONLY
>>> WAY!!! :D
>>>
>>>>I will then take the $300 and pick up 3 cheap mics like SM57s or the
>>>>like.
>>>>I will put those on Toms and use for extras like guitar cabs.
>>>
>>> OK, but if you must limit yourself to that price point, I am
>>> going to insist that you buy at least a couple Audix i5's
>>> instead... yes, I'm insisting - I won't let you do otherwise :)
>>> These things blow away 57's for guitar & snare, and plus you
>>> already have some 57's... GET SOME DIFFERENT VOICINGS GOING!
>>>
>>> Seriously - think about getting some different colors happening -
>>> what David said about going with only one MOTU Preamp set & one
>&g
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die [message #78587 is a reply to message #78584] |
Thu, 18 January 2007 12:21 |
Tony Benson
Messages: 453
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;> of another brand/tonality makes sense (I thought you already HAD
>>> the two MOTU boxes). Otherwise, you'd really be better off
>>> getting a halfway-decent small-format console (more
>>> routing/monitoring capabilities, plus all same-sounding preamps).
>>>
>>> Neil
>>
>>
>
>Now you're catching on... ;-)
David.
Brandon wrote:
> Ok....Morgan and I got on the subject of the Presonus also..
> I may do as you guys suggested.
> Get 1 presonus and 1 8pre. I will connect the presonus to the ADAT
> of the 8 pre.
> Sound better?
>
>How about a small 8 channel mixer as mentioned before?
Soundcraft makes some pretty decent smooth sounding pre's in your price range.
"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>Ok....Morgan and I got on the subject of the Presonus also..
>I may do as you guys suggested.
>Get 1 presonus and 1 8pre. I will connect the presonus to the ADAT
>of the 8 pre.
>Sound better?
>
>
>--
>Thanks,
>
>Brandon
>
>
>
>
>
>"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:45d33b7e@linux...
>>I like the idea of the 8 pres cause they have phantom power on all 8
>>channels.
>> Not like the other... Uhh ....Presonus I think.... I forget...... that
has
>> phantom power on only 4 channels.
>> The Motu 8 pre will be my comp sound card as well via firewire.
>> It is supposedly supposed to have a 1.6ms latency from analog in to analog
>> out. certainly more
>> during playback, but we'll see how it works.
>> I can daisy chain the two together and I would rather keep it simple at
>> first (same hardware)
>> for compatibility purposes. I can always switch things around later.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Brandon
>>
>>
>>
>> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:45d33a57$1@linux...
>>> Coincidentelly I was going to look at those. Audix i5's.
>>> I went on sweetwater and read the reviews for the SM57
>>> to get an idea of what other people were comparing them too
>>> and the Audix i5 was mentioned.
>>> Ok I will pick up some Audixi5's.
>>> I may pick up:
>>> 1 - Audix i5
>>> 1 - Audix D4
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Brandon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Neil" <IUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:45d3365a$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>>>>>wELL i AM dialing back a bit.
>>>>
>>>> NOOOOOOO! Spend all you have, and THEN SOME... it's the ONLY
>>>> WAY!!! :D
>>>>
>>>>>I will then take the $300 and pick up 3 cheap mics like SM57s or the
>>>>>like.
>>>>>I will put those on Toms and use for extras like guitar cabs.
>>>>
>>>> OK, but if you must limit yourself to that price point, I am
>>>> going to insist that you buy at least a couple Audix i5's
>>>> instead... yes, I'm insisting - I won't let you do otherwise :)
>>>> These things blow away 57's for guitar & snare, and plus you
>>>> already have some 57's... GET SOME DIFFERENT VOICINGS GOING!
>>>>
>>>> Seriously - think about getting some different colors happening -
>>>> what David said about going with only one MOTU Preamp set & one
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die [message #78588 is a reply to message #78587] |
Thu, 18 January 2007 12:27 |
Deej [4]
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
>>>> of another brand/tonality makes sense (I thought you already HAD
>>>> the two MOTU boxes). Otherwise, you'd really be better off
>>>> getting a halfway-decent small-format console (more
>>>> routing/monitoring capabilities, plus all same-sounding preamps).
>>>>
>>>> Neil
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>Hey Deej,
I'm not quite as black and white about onboard firewire as Lamont. I've seen
both desktops and laptops that--with good drivers--are usable for reasonably
sized audio projects. I lot of time you wind up doing some old school things
in the BIOS but it can be done.
That said, the difference in performance, quality, ease of install, and reliability
with the RME cardbus system vs. _everything_ out there for portable is, well,
stark. Put the card in, flash the bios in the card if necessary, connect
an interface, set latency to 1.5ms everywhere possible, and never ever ever
ever think about it again.
Unless you have to figure out total mix.
TCB
"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>I'm working some more with my musician friend here trying to get his
>Mac/Digi 002 based studio configured in a way that's easy for him to use.
>Since there are firewire bus limitations on his Macbook (not Macbook Pro),
>convolution reverbs are pretty much out of the question, plus he's looking
>for something to use during tracking anyway. I'm looking for some
>alternatives for him that would allow him to run hardware reverbs and
>control them from PTLE.. He is interested in the new Lexicon MX200 which
>interfaces via S/Pdif and/or analog (for audio) and USB (for VST capability
>and parameter control)and then can be accessed as a VST plugin. This looks
>like a pretty cool solution for him maybe. The MX 200 doesn't have the
>higher end algos that the MX 400 has, but he might want to go with the MX
>400 which does have increased capabilities................but
>anyway.............what I'm going to need is a Mac compatible VST>RTAS
>wrapper in order for this to work.
>
>Anyone tried this Lexicon box with a Mac/PTLE?
>
>Anyone point me to a VST>RTAS wrapper?
>
>I also need to look into whether or not the optical and coax digital I/O
on
>the 002 can be used in parallel as a pair of stereo S/Pdif I/O. Anyone have
>the answer to this one so I won't have to read a bunch of stuff and exercise
>my thought processes? ;oD
>
>Also, doesn't TC Electronics make some kind of box besides the POCO that
can
>operate as a VST plugin?
>
>He's more a musician than a techie and probably would be happier staying
>that way so I'm going to see if we can get him smilin'.
>
>thanks,
>
>Deej
>
>.
>
>In other words, I would humbly suggest a $500 ACER, some RME gear, and XP.
Samplitude LE will come with the RME gear as well.
TCB
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>Hey Deej,
>
>I'm not quite as black and white about onboard firewire as Lamont. I've
seen
>both desktops and laptops that--with good drivers--are usable for reasonably
>sized audio projects. I lot of time you wind up doing some old school things
>in the BIOS but it can be done.
>
>That said, the difference in performance, quality, ease of install, and
reliability
>with the RME cardbus system vs. _everything_ out there for portable is,
well,
>stark. Put the card in, flash the bios in the card if necessary, connect
>an interface, set latency to 1.5ms everywhere possible, and never ever ever
>ever think about it again.
>
>Unless you have to figure out total mix.
>
>TCB
>
>"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>I'm working some more with my musician friend here trying to get his
>>Mac/Digi 002 based studio configured in a way that's easy for him to use.
>
>>Since there are firewire bus limitations on his Macbook (not Macbook Pro),
>
>>convolution reverbs are pretty much out of the question, plus he's looking
>
>>for something to use during tracking anyway. I'm looking for some
>>alternatives for him that would allow him to run hardware reverbs and
>>control them from PTLE.. He is interested in the new Lexicon MX200 which
>
>>interfaces via S/Pdif and/or analog (for audio) and USB (for VST capability
>
>>and parameter control)and then can be accessed as a VST plugin. This looks
>
>>like a pretty cool solution for him maybe. The MX 200 doesn't have the
>>higher end algos that the MX 400 has, but he might want to go with the
MX
>
>>400 which does have increased capabilities................but
>>anyway.............what I'm going to need is a Mac compat
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die [message #78589 is a reply to message #78584] |
Thu, 18 January 2007 13:38 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ible VST>RTAS
>>wrapper in order for this to work.
>>
>>Anyone tried this Lexicon box with a Mac/PTLE?
>>
>>Anyone point me to a VST>RTAS wrapper?
>>
>>I also need to look into whether or not the optical and coax digital I/O
>on
>>the 002 can be used in parallel as a pair of stereo S/Pdif I/O. Anyone
have
>
>>the answer to this one so I won't have to read a bunch of stuff and exercise
>
>>my thought processes? ;oD
>>
>>Also, doesn't TC Electronics make some kind of box besides the POCO that
>can
>>operate as a VST plugin?
>>
>>He's more a musician than a techie and probably would be happier staying
>
>>that way so I'm going to see if we can get him smilin'.
>>
>>thanks,
>>
>>Deej
>>
>>.
>>
>>
>Get a room, you two! :^)
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
LaMont wrote:
> ooooooohh James...I did'n t think you cared (Wink wink)11
>
> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Happy V-Day everybody!
>>
>> James
>sadly, the snow there might make it difficult to do that.
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:06:11 -0700, Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com>
wrote:
>
>Get a room, you two! :^)
>
>Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>
>LaMont wrote:
>> ooooooohh James...I did'n t think you cared (Wink wink)11
>>
>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Happy V-Day everybody!
>>>
>>> James
>>kissies all around...mmmmmwah
On 15 Feb 2007 03:58:56 +1000, "James McCloskey"
<excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Happy V-Day everybody!
>
>Jamesnowhere do I see mention of the most unnecessary item all studios need desparately
-- a mural!
-steve
sorry. I couldn't help myself....
"PaulN" <pn@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>How about a small 8 channel mixer as mentioned before?
>Soundcraft makes some pretty decent smooth sounding pre's in your price
range.
>
>"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>>Ok....Morgan and I got on the subject of the Presonus also..
>>I may do as you guys suggested.
>>Get 1 presonus and 1 8pre. I will connect the presonus to the ADAT
>>of the 8 pre.
>>Sound better?
>>
>>
>>--
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Brandon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:45d33b7e@linux...
>>>I like the idea of the 8 pres cause they have phantom power on all 8
>>>channels.
>>> Not like the other... Uhh ....Presonus I think.... I forget...... that
>has
>>> phantom power on only 4 channels.
>>> The Motu 8 pre will be my comp sound card as well via firewire.
>>> It is supposedly supposed to have a 1.6ms latency from analog in
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die [message #78593 is a reply to message #78588] |
Thu, 18 January 2007 13:57 |
Tony Benson
Messages: 453
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;>>> WAY!!! :D
>>>>>
>>>>>>I will then take the $300 and pick up 3 cheap mics like SM57s or the
>
>>>>>>like.
>>>>>>I will put those on Toms and use for extras like guitar cabs.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, but if you must limit yourself to that price point, I am
>>>>> going to insist that you buy at least a couple Audix i5's
>>>>> instead... yes, I'm insisting - I won't let you do otherwise :)
>>>>> These things blow away 57's for guitar & snare, and plus you
>>>>> already have some 57's... GET SOME DIFFERENT VOICINGS GOING!
>>>>>
>>>>> Seriously - think about getting some different colors happening -
>>>>> what David said about going with only one MOTU Preamp set & one
>>>>> of another brand/tonality makes sense (I thought you already HAD
>>>>> the two MOTU boxes). Otherwise, you'd really be better off
>>>>> getting a halfway-decent small-format console (more
>>>>> routing/monitoring capabilities, plus all same-sounding preamps).
>>>>>
>>>>> Neil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>You know I'm a fan of TriTone plugs.
AngelTone is out of beta and sounds great!
http://www.tritonedigital.com/produc...products_id=31Try this:
http://www.tritonedigital.com/product_info.php?cPath=23& products_id=31
"Gene Lennon" <glennon@nospMyrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>You know I'm a fan of TriTone plugs.
>AngelTone is out of beta and sounds great!
>
>http://www.tritonedigital.com/produc...products_id=31steve the artguy wrote:
> nowhere do I see mention of the most unnecessary item all studios need desparately
> -- a mural!
>
What Steve said.
And skip the mics for now and get yourself a matched pair of lava lamps instead..
Cheers,
TCLol!!! :)
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>In other words, I would humbly suggest a $500 ACER, some RME gear, and XP.
>Samplitude LE will come with the RME gear as well.
>
>TCB
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hey Deej,
>>
>>I'm not quite as black and white about onboard firewire as Lamont. I've
>seen
>>both desktops and laptops that--with good drivers--are usable for reasonably
>>sized audio projects. I lot of time you wind up doing some old school things
>>in the BIOS but it can be done.
>>
>>That said, the difference in performance, quality, ease of install, and
>reliability
>>with the RME cardbus system vs. _everything_ out there for portable is,
>well,
>>stark. Put the card in, flash the bios in the card if necessary, connect
>>an interface, set latency to 1.5ms everywhere possible, and never ever
ever
>>ever think about it again.
>>
>>Unless you have to figure out total mix.
>>
>>TCB
>>
>>"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>>I'm working some more with my musician friend here trying to get his
>>>Mac/Digi 002 based studio configured in a way that's easy for him to use.
>>
>>>Since there are firewire bus limitations on his Macbook (not Macbook Pro),
>>
>>>convolution reverbs are pretty much out of the question, plus he's looking
>>
>>>for something to use during tracking anyway. I'm looking for some
>>>alternatives for him that would allow him to run hardware reverbs and
>>>control them from PTLE.. He is interested in the new Lexicon MX200 which
>>
>>>interfaces via S/Pdif and/or analog (for audio) and USB (for VST capability
>>
>>>and parameter control)and then can be accessed as a VST plugin. This looks
>>
>>>like a pretty cool solution for him maybe. The MX 200 doesn't have the
>
>>>higher end algos that the MX 400 has, but he might want to go with the
>MX
>>
>>>400 which does have increased capabilities................but
>>>anyway.............what I'm going to need is a Mac compatible VST>RTAS
>
>>>wrapper in order for this to work.
>>>
>>>Anyone tried this Lexicon box with a Mac/PTLE?
>>>
>>>Anyone point me to a VST>RTAS wrapper?
>>>
>>>I also need to look into whether or not the optical and coax digital I/O
>>on
>>>the 002 can be used in parallel as a pair of stereo S/Pdif I/O. Anyone
>have
>>
>>>the answer to this one so I won't have to read a bunch of stuff and exercise
>>
>>>my thought processes? ;oD
>>>
>>>Also, doesn't TC Electronics make some kind of box besides the POCO that
>>can
>>>operate as a VST plugin?
>>>
>>>He's more a musician than a techie and probably would be happier staying
>>
>>>that way so I'm goi
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die [message #78594 is a reply to message #78593] |
Thu, 18 January 2007 14:39 |
Deej [4]
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ng to see if we can get him smilin'.
>>>
>>>thanks,
>>>
>>>Deej
>>>
>>>.
>>>
>>>
>>
>http://www.manleylabs.com/containerpages/LDVC.html
I'm dropping some bucks on analog stuff to record my band. I'm going to get
a couple of cheaper things (RNP/RNC combos and such) but was thinking of
one of these. It seems to fit nicely for what I want feature wise. Simple
opto dynamics, two bands of shelf EQ, and a pretty good pre. It could be
linked for overheads and room mics or split for individual instruments. And
it even will work as a DI for bass and guitars.
It's coming down to this or a Portico dual pre and dual compressor combo.
That's nearly twice the scratch, which isn't impossible, but if anyone has
thoughts I'd be interested.
Thanks,
TCBI've heard this unit described as being very transparent. I almost bought
one of these because I was looking for something nice for acoustic
instruments, then Mike Claytor decided to sell his Great River MP2-MH for
about the same price and I grabbed it. I'm not sure this will have the
attitude that is possible with the Neve, but attitude can be added at any
time, I suppose. I'm getting a Neve Portico stereo comp in here next week.
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:45d39fa4$1@linux...
>
> http://www.manleylabs.com/containerpages/LDVC.html
>
> I'm dropping some bucks on analog stuff to record my band. I'm going to
> get
> a couple of cheaper things (RNP/RNC combos and such) but was thinking of
> one of these. It seems to fit nicely for what I want feature wise. Simple
> opto dynamics, two bands of shelf EQ, and a pretty good pre. It could be
> linked for overheads and room mics or split for individual instruments.
> And
> it even will work as a DI for bass and guitars.
>
> It's coming down to this or a Portico dual pre and dual compressor combo.
> That's nearly twice the scratch, which isn't impossible, but if anyone has
> thoughts I'd be interested.
>
> Thanks,
>
> TCBCool, Deej, and thanks. Opinions on the Neve once you get it would be most
welcome as well.
TCB
"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>I've heard this unit described as being very transparent. I almost bought
>one of these because I was looking for something nice for acoustic
>instruments, then Mike Claytor decided to sell his Great River MP2-MH for
>about the same price and I grabbed it. I'm not sure this will have the
>attitude that is possible with the Neve, but attitude can be added at any
>time, I suppose. I'm getting a Neve Portico stereo comp in here next week.
>
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:45d39fa4$1@linux...
>>
>> http://www.manleylabs.com/containerpages/LDVC.html
>>
>> I'm dropping some bucks on analog stuff to record my band. I'm going to
>> get
>> a couple of cheaper things (RNP/RNC combos and such) but was thinking
of
>> one of these. It seems to fit nicely for what I want feature wise. Simple
>> opto dynamics, two bands of shelf EQ, and a pretty good pre. It could
be
>> linked for overheads and room mics or split for individual instruments.
>> And
>> it even will work as a DI for bass and guitars.
>>
>> It's coming down to this or a Portico dual pre and dual compressor combo.
>> That's nearly twice the scratch, which isn't impossible, but if anyone
has
>> thoughts I'd be interested.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> TCB
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C75079.9AB708E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
It snowed about a foot, now its raining big fat drops and the wind is up.
Just finished up in the studio after my boss granted us a snow day. I
finally got all the gear set up. The cables need a good sorting and
straightening, but its all up and all syncable. I believe the mix I'm
working on is the biggest to date: 108 tracks (52 stereo) -lots of Acid
stuff and midimidimidi. And...the mix buss is delivering a nice beeg
largness of sonic phat. Man, this DAW don't have all the features -but its
sure got sound! What a way to spend a snow day :-).
Cheers,
MR
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C75079.9AB708E0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1555" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>It snowed about a foot, now its raining =
big fat=20
drops and the wind is up. Just finished up in the studio after my =
boss=20
granted us a snow day. I finally got all the gear set up. =
The cables=20
need a good sorting and straightening, but its all up and all =
syncable. I=20
believe the mix I'm working on is the biggest to date: 108 tracks (52 =
stereo)=20
-lots of Acid stuff and midimidimidi. And...the mix buss is =
delivering a=20
nice beeg largness of sonic phat. Man, this DAW don't have =
all the=20
features -but its sure got sound! What a way to spend a snow day=20
:-).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Cheers,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>MR</FONT></DIV&
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die [message #78595 is a reply to message #78584] |
Thu, 18 January 2007 18:17 |
LaMont
Messages: 828
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;</BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C75079.9AB708E0--Thanks guys, its now working great. I could not get it working with the
nvidia geforce2 video card - some type of resource hogging(not IRQ). With
the EDS card out video worked great. I tried the EDS in slots 2 and 3, but
video would lose resolution with an error message that it couldn't find
enough resources. Tried a Matrox G450 and no problem. Paris installed and
runs fine. I did switch HDs to a clone I had, so not sure what the loss of
video problem was yet on the other drive. I have a newer nvidia geforce
6200 though that I need to work so I can use my 20" digital monitor
(1680x1050), which lets me get the whole mixer on screen. x
EdnaIf you have installed any matrox driver be SURE to annihilate them down to a
generic 16 color windows driver before you try to install any other video
card.
AA
"RiverLake Farms" <edna@texomaonline.com> wrote in message
news:45d3c9af@linux...
> Thanks guys, its now working great. I could not get it working with the
> nvidia geforce2 video card - some type of resource hogging(not IRQ).
> With the EDS card out video worked great. I tried the EDS in slots 2 and
> 3, but video would lose resolution with an error message that it couldn't
> find enough resources. Tried a Matrox G450 and no problem. Paris
> installed and runs fine. I did switch HDs to a clone I had, so not sure
> what the loss of video problem was yet on the other drive. I have a newer
> nvidia geforce 6200 though that I need to work so I can use my 20" digital
> monitor (1680x1050), which lets me get the whole mixer on screen. x
> Edna
>I didn't install a driver, it came from WXP. I'll check and see if it is a
Matrox driver and replace it with the generic if so.
Thanks
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
news:45d3ce8f$1@linux...
> If you have installed any matrox driver be SURE to annihilate them down to
> a generic 16 color windows driver before you try to install any other
> video card.
> AA
>
>
> "RiverLake Farms" <edna@texomaonline.com> wrote in message
> news:45d3c9af@linux...
>> Thanks guys, its now working great. I could not get it working with the
>> nvidia geforce2 video card - some type of resource hogging(not IRQ).
>> With the EDS card out video worked great. I tried the EDS in slots 2 and
>> 3, but video would lose resolution with an error message that it couldn't
>> find enough resources. Tried a Matrox G450 and no problem. Paris
>> installed and runs fine. I did sw
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die [message #78597 is a reply to message #78595] |
Thu, 18 January 2007 18:43 |
chuck duffy
Messages: 453
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
3, but video would lose resolution with an error message that it couldn't
>> find enough resources. Tried a Matrox G450 and no problem. Paris
>> installed and runs fine. I did switch HDs to a clone I had, so not sure
>> what the loss of video problem was yet on the other drive. I have a
>> newer nvidia geforce 6200 though that I need to work so I can use my 20"
>> digital monitor (1680x1050), which lets me get the whole mixer on screen.
>> x
>> Edna
>>
>
>http://www.dataviz.com/products/macopener/mo_techspecs.html
Check the last line of the system requirements. I'm building my wife a new
graphics computer based on an AMD64 4200 x 2 CPU on an ASUS A8V-Deluxe mobo
(used to be my native DAW). She's migrating from a Cobalt G4 and needs to be
able to access her old files that she created on her Mac.
Is there another app that will do this or do I need not worry? I can't call
them. It's too late and I need to know the answer to this right now or I
will die.
Thanks,
Deej?What kind of files? Photoshop and Illustrator files are cross platform as
are almost all generic graphic file formats like jpg, gif, pict, bmp, tiff
etc.
Should not be a problem.
Gene
"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>http://www.dataviz.com/products/macopener/mo_techspecs.html
>
>Check the last line of the system requirements. I'm building my wife a new
>graphics computer based on an AMD64 4200 x 2 CPU on an ASUS A8V-Deluxe mobo
>(used to be my native DAW). She's migrating from a Cobalt G4 and needs to
be
>able to access her old files that she created on her Mac.
>
>Is there another app that will do this or do I need not worry? I can't call
>them. It's too late and I need to know the answer to this right now or I
>will die.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Deej
>On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:08:21 -0500, rick <parnell68@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Charlie was fixing a door and found that he needed a new hinge, so he
>sent his wife Mary to Home Depot.
>At Home Depot, Mary saw a beautiful teapot on a top shelf while she
>was waiting for Walt, the manager, to finish waiting on a customer.
>When Walt was finished, Mary asked "How much for the teapot?"
>Walt replied, "That's silver and it costs $300." "My goodness that
>sure is a lot of money!" Mary exclaimed.
>Then she proceeded to describe the hinge that Charlie had sent her to
>buy, and Walt went to the back room to find it. From the back room
>Walt yelled, "Mary, you wanna screw for that hinge?"
>Mary replied, "No, but I will for the teapot."
>This is why you can't send a woman to Home Depot.
>
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!
that be good.
pab"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>Tommy kicks some serious ass with that slide shit. I need to work him into
>a project.
>Gene
>
>"Bill Terry" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>This Tommy Detamore interview is up on Project Studio Network, show number
>>57. I
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die [message #78600 is a reply to message #78597] |
Thu, 18 January 2007 19:26 |
LaMont
Messages: 828
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
either buy another one to use as a
killer stereo LDC pair or sell/trade this one. Comes with
Cherrywood box, and will include B.L.U.E. Series 1 Shockmount
with it. $800
2.) B.L.U.E. Baby Bottle - Kick-ass mic for male rock vocals,
and I've found it can sound killer on hi-hat, too. I've heard
some guys like it on guitar; me, not so much. I also understand
that rappers LOVE this mic - I don't work in that genre, so I
dunno.... if you so any work in that genre, it might be a nice
asset for not much money. Strong midrange presence, but without
the "adenoidal" quality that some mics with this characteristic
can sometimes impart. Just simply another really great B.L.U.E.
Class-A LDC. Not something I'd really use in a stereo pair, and
I have two, so I don't need both of 'em. Missing a setscrew at
the very top of the windscreen - B.L.U.E. no longer has this
specific screw, so you'd have to find it in your area if you
want to replace it... two studs at opposing thirds of the
grille assembly hold it solid, though - just TRY to get it
loose as it is, I dare ya! (lol) Comes with Cherrywood box &
swivelmount (no shock). $400
3.) Neumann M-149 Multi-pattern Tube LDC. (YES! Another
microphone! I have Thirty-freakin'-one'-freakin-microphones,
and I don't need QUITE that many right now! OK, maybe
I do - maybe I just need a few different ones from some of the
ones I got... just keep reading, dammit! lol). OK, this is my
only slightly beat-up piece, I got it from Bearsville when they
closed recently. It's currently got a Peluso K-67-type capsule
in there right now (the orignal one was trashed - I still have
it & could include it, but it needs re-skinning), one screw that
holds the windscreen is broken, but the remaining three screws
hold the screen in place with nary a wobble. To restore this
aspect to original condition you would have to remove the
broken portion of the screw from the body & get a replacement
screw. Also, the green LED in the power supply does not work
(I've written Neumann about getting this as replacement part,
but have not yet been able to establish if it's available); no
biggie, as this particular version of the power supply does not
come with a switch - you plug it in, it's on... you remove the
plug, it's off... who needs the fuckin' LED? This is a well-
used mic, OK? No major scratches or gouges, but the finish has
that typical Neumann patina to it. The Peluso CEK-67 capsule is
brighter than the stock M-149 capsule, take my word for
it.. it sounds more open & a little "looser", if that makes any
sense... more dynamic? Maybe that's a good way to describe it.
Also, the back side of the mic on Fig-8 with the stock capsule
on these mics is damn near identical to the front side, while
the Peluso is slightly different on the back side - a teensy,
weensy, tiny bit less high end & low end than the front side.
Most mics have a perceptible difference like this in Fig-8, I'm
just telling you upfront the differences between the stock
capsule & the Peluso one on this mic.
SPECIAL BONUS!!! I have a brand-spankin' new B.L.U.E. Cactus
capsule that I will swap out with the Peluso one if you want...
in either instance, it would come with a Cherrywood box,
shockmount, and of course, PSU & PSU cable. I'll offer this
setup in the following configurations:
a.) With Peluso CEK-367 capsule (already installed) $3,000
(includes stock capsule - bad/needs reskinning)
b.) With B.L.U.E. Cactus Capsule installed $3,500
(does not include separate stock capsule)
c.) With the stock Neumann capsule ONLY $2,700
(PERFECT if you want an M-149 CHEEEP to send to Klaus or SPA
for reskinning/reworking!)
4.) Neumann M-147 - this much-disparaged mic is really a damn
good one if you're looking for something smooth & not "hyped"
(Brandon asking about how to get that "bassy, intimate vocal"
on Bing Crobsy/Sinatra-kind of Christmas Carols? This mic'll do
it). It's a hybrid tube/SS circuit, so it's not super-bright
like a TLM-somethingorother and it's not as "warm" a
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die [message #78603 is a reply to message #78601] |
Thu, 18 January 2007 20:50 |
LaMont
Messages: 828
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
of course assuming anyone decides they want to grab it. It's
kind of dependant on whatever deal gets done first on which
mic... either way, you won't get fucked over, I'll see to that.
So, I'll also price this kit using a couple different options,
as follows (in all instances, this mic will come with a
swivelmount, PSU & PSU cable, and a nice Neumann aluminum case
for the kit!):
a.) Pure Stock w/stock capsule installed $1,500
b.) w/Stock capsule installed & Peluso CEK-367 included $1,675
c.) w/Peluso CEK-367 installed & stock one included $1,800
5.) Custom LDC w/David Royer Tube Circuit - (YES, ANOTHER
MICROPHONE!) This is an MXL V67 (color is black w/black grille)
that David Royer thought had a great capsule design, and
subsequently published a circuit - and later offered a kit for -
a conversion upgrade to a tube circuit & accompanying PSU for
this mic. Mike Claytor - who used to hang out here on this NG -
built this one, and it's a stellar piece of workmanship beyond
what I've seen on other DIY stuff I've run across (Deej also
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die [message #78640 is a reply to message #78589] |
Fri, 19 January 2007 08:05 |
Deej [4]
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ockets
>>
>> Expansion Slots
>> 5 PCI Slots
>> 1 Accelerated Graphics Port (AGP) Pro Slot
>>
>> System I/O
>> 1 Floppy Disk Drive Connector
>> 2 IDE Connectors (UltraDMA133/100/66 Support)
>> 1 COM2 Header
>> 1 Game port Connector
>> 1 Infrared Connector
>> 1 Panel Connector
>> 1 SM Bus Connector
>> USB Headers (Ports 5/6)
>> Serial ATA Headers
>> Modem Connector
>> IEEE 1394 Headers
>> S/PDIF Connector
>> 1 PS/2 Mouse Connector (green)
>> 1 PS/2 Keyboard Connector (purple)
>> RJ45 Connector (3COM LAN Controller)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Brandon Goodwin
>> Process Engineering
>> Pentech AssemblyI still think these guys are best
http://www.free-av.com/
free or paid.
For truly free
http://www.clamwin.com/
Windows firewall is fine.
TCB
"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>I'm building Amy a new graphics computer based around my old ASUS A8V-DLX
>mobo with an AMD dual core 4200 CPU and a couple gigs of RAM. I figure this
>should be quick enough for graphics work running Photoshop, Illustrator,
>Pagemaker, etc.
>
>I run Norton Systemworks on my office machine, but I'm sure this ain't the
>best in the world for a rig that needs to be quick. I'm looking for
>something that will run in the background and just do it's job without all
>of the crap that Norton does. She will be online with this machine so I
want
>it well protected......and yes, she will be using IE so keeping that in
>mind, what's the best stuff to use?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Deej
>
>Hi Brandon,
These 2 work well.
One thing to avoid is the Firewire A(400)/B(800) combo cards they have
the most compatibility issues.
http://www.adstech.com/products/API311/intro/API311intro.asp ?pid=API311
http://www.siig.com/product.asp?catid=1&pid=372
Chris
Brandon wrote:
> Thanks David.
> What brand is commonly known as being good?
>
>
--
Chris Ludwig
ADK Pro Audio
(859) 635-5762
www.adkproaudio.com
chrisl@adkproaudio.comFinding one with a TI chipset will be difficult... the suppliers don't
often tell you whos chipset they are using. I would ask MOTU tech
support for a recommended brand.
David.
Brandon wrote:
> Thanks David.
> What brand is commonly known as being good?
>
>Got one of these yet? ;-)
http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Product_C2& childpagename=US%2FLayout&cid=1130276636538&pagename =Linksys%2FCommon%2FVisitorWrapper
David.
DJ wrote:
> I'm building Amy a new graphics computer based around my old ASUS A8V-DLX
> mobo with an AMD dual core 4200 CPU and a couple gigs of RAM. I figure this
> should be quick enough for graphics work running Photoshop, Illustrator,
> Pagemaker, etc.
>
> I run Norton Systemworks on my office machine, but I'm sure this ain't the
> best in the world for a rig that needs to be quick. I'm looking for
> something that will run in the background and just do it's job without all
> of the crap that Norton does. She will be online with this machine so I want
> it well protected......and yes, she will be using IE so keeping that in
> mind, what's the best stuff to use?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Deej
>
>Yeah looking on newegg they dont tell you what chipset.
I did a search for it specifically and found one that has 3 ports up to 400.
So it is not a 400/800.
aLSO IT IS A ti CHIPSET.
$41 WITH SHIPPING.
Thanks for the help guys.
--
Thanks,
Brandon
"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:45d4d11f@linux...
> Finding one with a TI chipset will be difficult... the suppliers don't
> often tell you whos chipset they are using. I would ask MOTU tech support
> for a recommended brand.
>
> David.
>
> Brandon wrote:
>> Thanks David.
>> What brand is commonly known as being good?
>>Yes, lower buffer equals lower latency, but higher processor load.
Basically, it's best to record using the lowest buffer setting you can,
without your computer choking. Then, when everything's recorded, set the
buffer higher, and you'll have more processor overhead available for
plug-ins, more playback tracks, VSTi's, etc. during mixing. The only thing
the higher buffer does on playback is maybe add a few hundred milliseconds
to the responsiveness of starting and stopping. So when you hit "play" you
have to wait a whole 1/3 of a second before sound starts coming out. Not a
big deal in the grand scheme of things.
Tony
"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:45d4c30e$1@linux...
> Well it look s like my built in firewire chipset is realtek.
> Motu recommends Texas instruments for least problems.
> So I will pick up a PCI expansion card for a firewire port that has a ti
> chipset.
>
> So the lower the buffer the less latency you will have?
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Brandon
>
>
> "Tony Benson" <tony@standinghampton.com> wrote in message
> news:
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 5042 tape deck emulator-read this or you will die [message #78747 is a reply to message #78584] |
Sun, 21 January 2007 10:16 |
Dimitrios
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
two apps were being picked up by Paris till I hid
them. When Paris began working, I unhid them and Paris picked them up and
once again I was getting the c0000005 error on close. Rehid them and error
went away. So there were two factors in my case causing this error. These
plugs, nero resize, and FL plugs are not even functional in Paris, but I'm
not sure how to stop Paris from picking them up other that to uninstall
them.
Thanks,
Edna
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
news:45d85ff8@linux...
> That depends on what OS, what else you load at start up and if using XP
> how far along the 'patches' are. My paris rig is stripped so clean about
> 80 MB is used at start up. However, my daytime gig dictates all the latest
> releases of patches and business apps and those machines start at over 300
> MB usage.
> Open your task manager and see... is it using more RAM than you have
> physically? Here is your guage.
>
> AA
>
>
> "RiverLake Farms" <edna@texomaonline.com> wrote in message
> news:45d76997@linux...
>> Well it seems to be working fine now. I removed the 1G stick of Ultra
>> pc3200 cl3, and used 1 stick of Geil 256MB cl2.5 memory???? This did the
>> trick although I can't imagine why (thanks Kim). Also got the nvidia
>> 6200 video card working (thanks AA for the tip on uninstalling the video
>> drivers of the old card). Is 256MB sufficient for running Paris on? I
>> haven't tried recording yet, but playback is fine.
>> Thanks much all,
>> Edna
>> "RiverLake Farms" <edna@texomaonline.com> wrote in message
>> news:45d74920@linux...
>>> uninstalled Paris and reinstalled to C:\Paris Pro. No effect. Still
>>> get the c0000005 error. Did the reg tweaks, still no effect. Removed
>>> all native plugs, no effect. Disabled network card and USB in bios. It
>>> gives error everytime immediately on closing Paris even if no project
>>> loaded. I'm stumped at this point. MB is Abit NF7-2G with AMD 2400+ and
>>> nvidia geforce 2 video card. 1G Ultra ram.???? Never had these
>>> problems with Paris on my P4 system.
>>> Edna
>>>
>>> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message
>>> news:45d72875$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Root is not C:\E-MU\Paris Pro
>>>> but C:\Paris Pro.
>>>> Also DELETE the old folder in Program files because you might wrongly
>>>> have
>>>> the shortcut on you desktop refering to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Jun 01 13:13:48 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08362 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
