The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » NAMM audio news
NAMM audio news [message #78611] Thu, 18 January 2007 21:52 Go to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
across over ethernet.

Hoov

DJ wrote:
> Hi Gene,
>
> We got Photoshop, Illustrator, Pagemaker and a bazillion other programs
> today. some of them may not translate to the PC from the Mac without some
> help.
>
> this same company has another program that incorporates Macopener with the
> ability to translate other files.........but I guess I'll find out tomorrow
> if it's AMD compatible.
>
> Thanks,
>
> DJ
>
> "Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message
> news:45d3df1c$1@linux...
>
>>What kind of files? Photoshop and Illustrator files are cross platform as
>>are almost all generic graphic file formats like jpg, gif, pict, bmp, tiff
>>etc.
>>Should not be a problem.
>>Gene
>>
>>"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.dataviz.com/products/macopener/mo_techspecs.html
>>>
>>>Check the last line of the system requirements. I'm building my wife a new
>>
>>>graphics computer based on an AMD64 4200 x 2 CPU on an ASUS A8V-Deluxe
>>>mobo
>>
Re: NAMM audio news [message #78629 is a reply to message #78611] Fri, 19 January 2007 07:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TCB is currently offline  TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
Senior Member
r /> >>
>> David (or anyone) what's the latency per foot for Firewire
>> cable... anyone know?
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
>> EK Sound <askme@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>Solution #1 will provide the lowest latency. You will also find that
>>>monitoring from a different interface than the one you are recording
>>>through will create some problems, if it works at all.
>>>
>>>David.
>>>
>>>Brandon wrote:
>>>> Given the opportunity which signal chain would you prefer and why?
>>>>
>>>> source------------mic pre/ analog to digi converter -------------ADAT
>>
>>>> lightpipe--------------------PCI sound card--------monitor outs from
PCI
>>
>>>> sound card
>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> source------------mic pre/ analog to digi converter
>>>> -------------Firewire--------------------(i dont know where the signal
>>
>>>> goes after this????)-----------monitor outs from PCI sound card
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Brandon
>>
>
>Well now...
What kind of problems can I expect If I am using an external firewire audio
card for
all my audio needs?
Other than latency?



--
Thanks,

Brandon

"Mike Audet" <mike@mike....> wrote in message news:45d4a527$1@linux...
>
> Yea, it's not the length of the firewire cable that intr
Re: NAMM audio news [message #78637 is a reply to message #78629] Fri, 19 January 2007 07:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [4] is currently offline  Deej [4]   BRAZIL
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member
it.
>>
>> It just wasn't designed for audio recording.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> "Tony Benson" <tony@standinghampton.com> wrote:
>>>There would be no noticeable latency introduced by the Firewire cable.
>>>The
>>
>>>electrical signal travels at close to the speed of light! Any audio
>>>latency
>>
>>>would come from the processing before or after the Firewire. There may be
>> a
>>>limit on reliable signal cable length, but that would have to do with the
>>
>>>increasing cable capacitance.
>>>
>>>Tony
>>>
>>>
>>>"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:45d2161c$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> David (or anyone) what's the latency per foot for Firewire
>>>> cable... anyone know?
>>>>
>>>> Neil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> EK Sound <askme@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>>Solution #1 will provide the lowest latency. You will also find that
>>>>>monitoring from a different interface than the one you are recording
>>>>>through will create some problems, if it works at all.
>>>>>
>>>>>David.
>>>>>
>>>>>Brandon wrote:
>>>>>> Given the opportunity which signal chain would you prefer and why?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> source------------mic pre/ analog to digi converter -------------ADAT
>>>>
>>>>>> lightpipe--------------------PCI sound card--------monitor outs from
>> PCI
>>>>
>>>>>> sound card
>>>>>>
>>>>>> or
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> source------------mic pre/ analog to digi conv
Re: NAMM audio news [message #78652 is a reply to message #78637] Fri, 19 January 2007 09:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TCB is currently offline  TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
Senior Member
Peluso is slightly
different on the back side - a teensy, weensy, tiny bit less
high end & low end than the front side. Most mics have a
perceptible difference like this in Fig-8, I'm just telling you
upfront the differences between the stock capsule & the Peluso
one on this particular mic.
SPECIAL BONUS OFFER!!! I have a brand-spankin' new B.L.U.E.
Cactus capsule that I will swap out with the Peluso one if you
want... in either instance, it would come with a Cherrywood box,
shockmount, and of course, PSU & PSU cable. I'll offer this
setup in the following configurations:

a.) With Peluso CEK-367 capsule (already installed) $3,000
(includes stock capsule - bad/needs reskinning)
b.) With B.L.U.E. Cactus Capsule installed $3,500
(does not include separate stock capsule)
c.) With the stock Neumann capsule ONLY $2,700
(PERFECT if you want an M-149 CHEEEP to send to Klaus or SPA
for reskinning/reworking!)


3.) B.L.U.E. Bluberry - Extremely Clean class-A cardioid
LDC which to my ears sounds very C-12-like on the high end in
that thinly-bright, airy way, but cleaner on the mids, and with
less proximity effect & "wooliness" (this, despite the fact
that it's got a transformer in it!). Honestly, this super-clean
lack of "wool" & proximity effect might be this mic's weakness,
as whenever I've a/b'ed it with my Soundelux 251C, singers
always opt for the 251C (kinda similar high end, but more
proximity & "wool", and let's face it, lotsa singers like to
hear that lo-mid harmonic distorion in their voices). It is NOT
a super-warm mic, but it is also NOT that "edgy" kind of bright
like a TLM103 or a C-1; it's much smoother than both of those -
maybe something like a 414B-XL, but with a lot more character?
That might be another close description.
This is the older-style ("VINTAGE!!!" lol) Blueberry without
the knob-type-thingies on the sides for their newer shockmounts
to grab onto... Comes with Cherrywood box, and will include
B.L.U.E. Series 1 Shockmount (the one that works with this body
style) with it. $800

"E" me at: neil DOT henderson AT sbcglobal DOT net
if interested.

NeilHi,
To remind us of some things and their possible workarounds...

1)Paris lets you use only 64 DX plugins at once.
For this by using the free FFX4 DX chainer which is stable too, there is
an update bin3 for it, can overcome this by far.

2)VST's do not work well directly with Paris,
You can either use FXpansion 3.3 and transform them to DX or use Chainer
which is a fantas
Re: NAMM audio news [message #78657 is a reply to message #78652] Fri, 19 January 2007 09:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [4] is currently offline  Deej [4]   BRAZIL
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member
> with waves plugins sometimes crashing when loading a song containing them
> in Paris.
> IOPageLockLimit=0x00040000
> Pagedpoolsize=0xfffffffS
> The above applies if you have some hefty memory like 1GB.
> Any findings that you wanna share here that can make Paris run more stable
> ?
> Regards,
> DimitriosExactly Neil.
I was getting it almost everytime loading a song with DX waves plugins loaded...
Unhandled exception c0000005 at adress: ......
You know the picture...
Now I am getting this when I try to reload a project after I have loaded
succesfully the first time.
I changed for that the disablepagingexecutive(1) and LargeSystemCache(1).
The other strings I have put (that moght helped too) are on same registry
place where the above are...
How did you get around with these unhandled exceptions and when are you getting
it ?
Regards,
Dimitrios

"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>Were you getting get an error message stating "C0000005" or something like

>that ?
>
>and where do I find these two lines on my computer?
>
> IOPageLockLimit=0x00040000
> Pagedpoolsize=0xfffffffS
>
>Don
>
>
>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:45d55898$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi,
>> I seem to find that some xp tweaks can cause Paris either to run better
or
>> worse.
>> The disablepagingexecutive(1) and LargeSystemCache(1) has helped me a
lot
>> with waves plugins sometimes crashing when loading a song containing them
>> in Paris.
>> IOPageLockLimit=0x00040000
>> Pagedpoolsize=0xfffffffS
>> The above applies if you have some hefty memory like 1GB.
>> Any findings that you wanna share here that can make Paris run more stable
>> ?
>> Regards,
>> Dimitrios
>
>Run the app called "c74 cleaner" (I think). It comes with the new runtime.

rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>i tried it and it killed pluggoruntime 353 and both color and
>phasetone. i'll try again today and see if i can get them back.
>
>On 16 Feb 2007 13:55:11 +1000, "Gene Lennon"
><glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>I’ve been testing the beta in DP and Logic.
>>
>>"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>What DAW are you running it in?
>>>
>>>Gantt
>>>
>>>"Gene Lennon" <glennon@nospMyrealbox.com> wr
Re: NAMM audio news [message #78659 is a reply to message #78652] Fri, 19 January 2007 10:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
gene lennon is currently offline  gene lennon
Messages: 565
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
t;>
>>> Check this out;
>>> http://spyder.brp.com/en-US/
>>
>Mark,

Check out a show called futurecar on discovery. I think its right up your
alley. They had a four wheel car that banked. Amazing sight.

Chuck


"W. Mark Wilson" <xpam_mark@avidrecording> wrote:
>EGGS--ZACKLY !!! That's the trick -- right there.
>
>W
>
>"Paul Artola" <artola@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:

Report message to a moderator

Re: NAMM audio news [message #78818 is a reply to message #78629] Mon, 22 January 2007 10:58 Go to previous message
Doug Wellington is currently offline  Doug Wellington   UNITED STATES
Messages: 251
Registered: June 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Senior Member
adats.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>That's an expensive card $500 or so but I know latency is a big
>>>>>>>>>>>deal.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Since the digimax doesn't have firewire you have to adat in so
>>>>>>>>>>>you
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>really want a card on the motherboard to do that with I think.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Still learning,
>>>>>>>>>>>John
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Brandon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>&g


Previous Topic: Dave (EK) read this!!!!
Next Topic: Author of Vertex VST will update with Latency compensator for Paris !!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 21 07:28:11 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.79504 seconds