|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Saddam Hussein found guilty [message #75457 is a reply to message #75427] |
Sun, 05 November 2006 23:44  |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> >> >> >>You mentioned in the Pulsar thread:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>"My XP /Paris rig is so stable, and with the URS and Waves SSL
> >plugins..
> >> >> >>It's
> >> >> >>mixing dream for ITBB mixing.."
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Would you mind posting your setup, computerswise especially, but
> >> >> >>also Paris hardware. I really don;t want to jump through as many
> >> >> >>hoops as the multi computer thing. I am getting fantastic
> >> >> >>results as is with paris, especially using lots of analog inserts
> >> >> >>and external verbs. I just want to increase my horsepower and go
> >> >> >>to the SSL plugs etc. SOunds like you are doing what I want to
do.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>I use 3 mecs with 8 analog inserts per mec (8in/8out cards) with
> a
> >huge
> >> >> >rack
> >> >> >>of outboard. A couple of ADAT cards for returning the verbs like
> the
> >> >KSP8,
> >> >> >>spdif i/os for verbs on various cards, and IF2's for multing via
> >analog
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>verb sends across submixes etc.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>I have one UAD card and usually get a sound I like and just render
> >it.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>I want to go to a 4 mec setup, with more plugin horsepower. Like
> I
> >> >said,
> >> >> >>I love my setup, and it brings me all the work I can handle.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>My inquiring mind wants to know... :) 'preciate it...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>Saw a thread a while back that said some of theb"early" eds effects
cause issues. Which ones were they? The thread didn't specify. I've
been having issue with audio files assign to instruments, showing
editor, but no sound or meter movement on the channel or the submix.
Thanks,
HoovThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_01D5_01C70F6B.3614F950
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Jeff,
Your screen shot looks like it shows 3 more strips than 1280x1024 =
allows. That's nice.
I was thinking of using the Matrox Triple Head 2 Go which seemingly only =
provides 3840x1024
to three monitors off of the second head of my dual head card. I think =
I'll be stuck here right?
I guess with this scenario I'll be stuck with 1280x1024 permanently. =
Okay then no widescreen.
I also really don't like that shiny glass look of some new LCDs. I =
prefer the flat look if you
know what I mean. They don't seem to show glare as much. Is there a =
name for that duller looking=20
type screen?
Thanks for all the info. It is helping.
Tom
"Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message =
news:4566730a@linux...
Don,
Screen shot attached at 1600X1200.
Hoov
Don Nafe wrote:
> Hey Jeff
>=20
> Are you saying you can't load all of the mixer and if so how much?
>=20
> Any chance of a screen shot of a maxed out mixer so I can see what's =
not=20
> showing...would be appreciated
>=20
> Don
>=20
>=20
> "Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message =
news:Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
