|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: RME Wordclock ? [message #68999 is a reply to message #68994] |
Tue, 06 June 2006 04:44   |
![Deej [1] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "Deej [1] is currently offline")
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ow.
> Colorado catches me off guard sometimes. It was about 97 degrees here
> today........humidity around 10% with light to moderate winds. It didn't
> really feel hot to me at all after living in Austin (80%+ humidity and 90+
> degrees) I didn't think about it much. I was out hiking some ridgelines and
> canyons scouting a route for a pipeline and I forgot to take any water
> along. After about an hour and a half I suddenly realized how far I had
> wandered from my truck (and my water) and I also realized how dry I was and
> how dizzy and weak I was starting to feel. that wind just sucked the
> moisture right out of me......kicked my butt. I've probably had about half
> gallon of water over the last hour or so. I doubt I'll even pee
> tonight........OK, sorry, too much info.
>
> ;o)
>
> Deej
>
> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
> news:C0E2839B.1C9C%dterry@keyofd.net...
>> Hey DJ - In Totalmix, click submix mode; then select the channel
> destination
>> selection (bottom of any channel) to be the digital outputs of the
> Multiface
>> you want to route to the ADAT - you'll have to do one pair of ADAT outs at
> a
>> time. Set the Totalmix fader levels on the analog input (top row, 1-2,
> 3-4,
>> 5-6, 7-8, etc) channels for those inputs to whatever level you want to
> send
>> to those digital outs (ctrl-click to set to nominal/0). You probably
> won't
>> have any other faders up for that submix destination. Repeat for each
>> output/submix you want to send that input to (or any other input).
>>
>> Repeat this with the Analog outputs (AN1-2 I think would be the analog
> outs
>> 1 and 2), as the destination in submix mode - now you can set levels for
> any
>> input, or ASIO channel to that output. Bring up the fader levels for the
>> digital inputs you want to send. Click off submix mode when you are done
> so
>> you don't change these (also store it to a preset).
>>
>> Hopefully that helps and isn't more confusing.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dedric
>>
>> On 7/18/06 6:40 AM, in article 44bcd778@linux, "DJ"
>> <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks everyone,
>>>
>>> T
|
|
|
|
| Re: RME Wordclock ? [message #69004 is a reply to message #68999] |
Tue, 06 June 2006 07:06 |
Sound Dog
Messages: 44
Registered: October 2005
|
Member |
|
|
ital
>> > outputs (for interfacing with Paris ADAT inputs) then, route the ADAT
>inputs
>> > of the Multiface (which are receiving the return signal from the Paris
>ADAT
>> > outs) to the Multiface analog outputs (I'm creating a cue mix here in
>Paris
>> > using the Multiface I/O like I would the Paris analog I/O). I
>accomplished
>> > this last night (sorta') but couldn't achieve a suitable signal level. I
>can
>> > do this by creating a routing matrix in Cubase, but this gets another
>layer
>> > of crap (Cubase) and the buffer settings involved. I just want to use
>> > Totalmix for this. Also, I would like to be able to track hi rez
>sessions to
>> > Cubase and I'm clueless about how to set up a cue mix for multiple I/O
>so as
>> > to interface it with my Furman HDS-16.
>> >
>> > I think I have all of your numbers here somewhere. Maybe I can figure
>out
>> > how to put together a conference call
>> >
>> > ;o)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Neil" <IOUOI@OIU.com> wrote in message news:44bcd2f9$1@linux...
>> >>
>> >> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>> >>> This thing just doesn't make any sense to me at all...........which
>means
>> >>> it's probably very simple.
>> >>
>> >> Well, I guess I understand it, more or less... I don't any
>> >> difficulty with using it, although I'll agree it's not most
>> >> intuitive interface they coud've devised. What are you having
>> >> trouble with? I'll try to help.
>> >>
>> >> Neil
>> >
>> >
>>
>When I build my new console I will need to insert a patchbay into my chain.
I have heard some people complain that patchbays severly decrease quality.
Opinions on that?
Also, suggestions on good patchbays with XLR inputs and balanced 1/4 ouputs?
Thanks,
bHey Brandon,
A patching system built from high quality cabling and connectors will
have little or no effect on the signal quality. I do recommend XLR
patching for mic lines... TRS would be fine for line level signals.
Avoid gold connections at the patching point, they are designed to be
used where the connection is never (or extremely seldom) removed. The
gold coating prevents oxidization over long periods of time. If used
in a patching point, the gold will wear off very quickly (negating any
benefits). If you can provide some details as to your set-up, I can
make some suggestions.
David.
Brandon wrote:
> When I build my new console I will need to insert a patchbay into my chain.
> I have heard some people complain that patchbays severly decrease quality.
> Opinions on that?
> Also, suggestions on good patchbays with XLR inputs and balanced 1/4 ouputs?
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: RME Wordclock ? [message #69005 is a reply to message #69004] |
Tue, 06 June 2006 07:44 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> Thanks,
> bThat would be the operative word
;o)
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qmsrb2972t74tr35flmc82o6i6409ropbk@4ax.com...
> i'm trying to think of the best word to use here...DUMBASS!!!!
> phew...i fell much better now...
>
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:24:39 -0600, "DJ"
> <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>
> >Thanks Dedric. I just got in and I'm fried so I'll give it a go tomorrow.
> >Colorado catches me off guard sometimes. It was about 97 degrees here
> >today........humidity around 10% with light to moderate winds. It didn't
> >really feel hot to me at all after living in Austin (80%+ humidity and
90+
> >degrees) I didn't think about it much. I was out hiking some ridgelines
and
> >canyons scouting a route for a pipeline and I forgot to take any water
> >along. After about an hour and a half I suddenly realized how far I had
> >wandered from my truck (and my water) and I also realized how dry I was
and
> >how dizzy and weak I was starting to feel. that wind just sucked the
> >moisture right out of me......kicked my butt. I've probably had about
half
> >gallon of water over the last hour or so. I doubt I'll even pee
> >tonight........OK, sorry, too much info.
> >
> >;o)
> >
> >Deej
> >
> >"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
> >news:C0E2839B.1C9C%dterry@keyofd.net...
> >> Hey DJ - In Totalmix, click submix mode; then select the channel
> >destination
> >> selection (bottom of any channel) to be the digital outputs of the
> >Multiface
> >> you want to route to the ADAT - you'll have to do one pair of ADAT outs
at
> >a
> >> time. Set the Totalmix fader levels on the analog input (top row, 1-2,
> >3-4,
> >> 5-6, 7-8, etc) channels for those inputs to whatever level you want to
> >send
> >> to those digital outs (ctrl-click to set to nominal/0). You probably
> >won't
> >> have any other faders up for that submix destination. Repeat for each
> >> output/submix you want to send that input to (or any other input).
> >>
> >> Repeat this with the Analog outputs (AN1-2 I think would be the analog
> >outs
> >> 1 and 2), as the destination in submix mode - now you can set levels
for
> >any
> >> input, or ASIO channel to that output. Bring up the fader levels for
the
> >> digital inputs you want to send. Click off submix mode when you are
done
> >so
> >> you don't change these (also store it to a preset).
> >>
> >> Hopefully that helps and isn't more confusing.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Dedric
> >>
> >> On 7/18/06 6:40 AM, in article 44bcd778@linux, "DJ"
> >> <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Thanks everyone,
> >> >
> >> > This is one that will likely require a phone call due to the
> >complicatedness
> >> > of the DAW(s) and the denseness of the engineer. One *simple* thing I
> >want
> >> > to do is to just route the analog inputs of my Multiface to the
digital
> >> > outputs (for interfacing with Paris ADAT inputs) then, route the ADAT
> >inputs
> >> > of the Multiface (which are receiving the return signal from the
Paris
> >ADAT
> >> > outs) to the Multiface analog outputs (I'm creating a cue mix here in
> >Paris
> >> > using the Multiface I/O like I would the Paris analog I/O). I
> >accomplished
> >> > this last night (sorta') but couldn't achieve a suitable signal
level. I
> >can
> >> > do this by creating a routing matrix in Cubase, but this gets another
> >layer
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: RME Wordclock ? [message #69031 is a reply to message #69005] |
Tue, 06 June 2006 22:43 |
Sound Dog
Messages: 44
Registered: October 2005
|
Member |
|
|
t; > This is one that will likely require a phone call due to the
> >> >> >complicatedness
> >> >> >> > of the DAW(s) and the denseness of the engineer. One *simple*
> >thing I
> >> >> >want
> >> >> >> > to do is to just route the analog inputs of my Multiface to the
> >> >digital
> >> >> >> > outputs (for interfacing with Paris ADAT inputs) then, route
the
> >ADAT
> >> >> >inputs
> >> >> >> > of the Multiface (which are receiving the return signal from
the
> >> >Paris
> >> >> >ADAT
> >> >> >> > outs) to the Multiface analog outputs (I'm creating a cue mix
here
> >in
> >> >> >Paris
> >> >> >> > using the Multiface I/O like I would the Paris analog I/O). I
> >> >> >accomplished
> >> >> >> > this last night (sorta') but couldn't achieve a suitable signal
> >> >level. I
> >> >> >can
> >> >> >> > do this by creating a routing matrix in Cubase, but this gets
> >another
> >> >> >layer
> >> >> >> > of crap (Cubase) and the buffer settings involved. I just want
to
> >use
> >> >> >> > Totalmix for this. Also, I would like to be able to track hi
rez
> >> >> >sessions to
> >> >> >> > Cubase and I'm clueless about how to set up a cue mix for
multiple
> >> >I/O
> >> >> >so as
> >> >> >> > to interface it with my Furman HDS-16.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I think I have all of your numbers here somewhere. Maybe I can
> >figure
> >> >> >out
> >> >> >> > how to put together a conference call
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > ;o)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > "Neil" <IOUOI@OIU.com> wrote in message
news:44bcd2f9$1@linux...
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> This thing just doesn't make any sense to me at
> >all...........which
> >> >> >means
> >> >> >> >>> it's probably very simple.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Well, I guess I understand it, more or less... I don't any
> >> >> >> >> difficulty with using it, although I'll agree it's not most
> >> >> >> >> intuitive interface they coud've devised. What are you having
> >> >> >> >> trouble with? I'll try to help.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Neil
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070609060205060705050004
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Not sure I understand the question... we had the TRS cables from the
MEC's attached to Tuchels on the back of the MCI, which were hardwired
to the Bantam bay on the console... This worked just fine, but "mic
level" signals didn't get passed through the bantam bays (we have XLR
patching for that (see pic). All mic inputs are hard terminated on the
back of the XLR patch directly to console and pre inputs We
recently sold the MCI and bought a DM2000... using Nuendo as a primary
tracking app now, Paris is connected to the DM via light pipe for summing.
TRS and bantam are just fine for line level... I personally don't
think they are suitable for mic level. Just my opinion.
David.
Dubya Mark Wilson wrote:
> May I ask what you have done then to make sure your analog PARIS inputs
> don't screw your signal path? Mod? Ties? Hardwired?
>
> Dubya
>
> "EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:44be7b9b@linux...
>
>>The connection quality is far less with a TRS (longframe or standard for
>>that matter) jack than with an XLR. The XLR has a good solid connection,
>>whereas the 1/4" jacks can move (rotate) with vibration.
>
>
>
--------------070609060205060705050004
Content-Type: image/jpeg;
name="Mic patch.jpg"
Con
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
