|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Songs In The Key Of Life [message #68000 is a reply to message #67960] |
Wed, 10 May 2006 10:19  |
John Macy
Messages: 242
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >>news:44808409$1@linux...
> >>>
> >>> Guess there aren't any, eh?
> >>>
> >>> Gantt
> >>>
> >>> "Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>I've been fooling around w/ the Waves IR-L reverb and I like it. I
have
> >>> a
> >>>>client who loves the idea of picking reverbs by names like "The
Viennese
> >>>>Opera Hall - row 7, center". Wierd, eh? Are there any convolution or
> >
> >>>>sampled
> >>>>reverbs that work w/ Paris?
> >>>>Wasn't there once a box that let you run VST plugins in real time as
an
> >>> outboard
> >>>>effect?
> >>>>
> >>>>Gantt
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> >>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
> >>
> >>
>You'd better be nice to me or it may show up on your doorstep on of these
days.
;o)
"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:44817d17@linux...
>
>
> I'm so glad I don't have all that shit. hehe
> John
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >Don't run a 15' WC cable from your master clock module to two distro
> >modules, then use another short WC cable to link the distro modules
together
> >and then run other WC cables of differing lengths to 3 x RME interfaces
> and
> >3 x MECs while also running ADAT sync cables from 3 x Paris ADAT modules
> to
> >the ADAT sync inputs of the 3 x RME cards while the digital I/O of the
RME
> >cards, the Paris modules, all of your external spdif gear and ADAT gear
> is
> >all patched into three different M-Audio Digipatch units which are daisy
> >chained to each other using spdif cables in an attempt to allow
simultaneous
> >clocking of everythiong from two different sources derived from the same
> >master clock while cross patching all of the digital I/O between various
> >lightpipe, coax and optical spdif devices through these digital patchbays
> >that, BTW, don't reclock the incoming/outgoing signal.
> >
> >I know a bunch of you guys were getting ready to do this , but just say
> no.
> >
> >(I swear there was a valid reason for trying this.........really there
was)
> >
> >;oD
> >
> >
>My Speakers (Modified Noteperfect Alpha Pros) are
34" off the floor
31" off the front wall
25" off the side walls
80" apart
in a room 10' X 19' 10" X 95"
DOn
"Bill Lorentzen" <bill@lorentzen.ws> wrote in message
news:4481b042$1@linux...
> Horizontal plane is not the same thing as place them horizontally.
>
> Still, the guy who answered obviously was far from expert. Some tips from
> my experience:
>
> If possible a yard from front wall
> Equilateral triangle
> Remove any objects fron the space in the triangle and as much as you can
> remove any objects from the plane of the triangle
> Auim the tweets at ear.
>
> Bill
>
> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:4481a5f0$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> According to the manual these were designed to be placed in a vertical
>> position. I have read articles on speaker placement and they say most
>> speakers
>> are designed to have the listeners ear at a level height with the tweeter
>> OR level with the space between the tweeter and the woofer. I notice that
>> the phantom center shifts up and down in front of me as I change my ear
>> level
>> in relation to the tweeters. It is written that there is an optimal
>> listening
>> position when considering phase relation between the tweeter and the
>> woofer.
>> I wrote to Mackie and there response was:
>>
>> "As long as you are a descent distance away from the cabinets, a meter
>> or so, I don't think it matters. Put them in a horizontal plane with
>> your head and stay a good bit away from them. You should be fine. msp"
>>
>> This response goes against how the speakers were designed to be mounted
>> and
>> listened thru.....So........
>> Does anyone know the optimal positioning?and why?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brandon
>>
>
>Wow. I am really impressed with the 1073. It is one of the few digital EQs
that has the muscle of an analog EQ. Gonna need this one. Probably need an
extra card too.
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
news:447fb61b@linux...
> Neve???? We don'need no steeenkin' Neve!!.......erm.......well, maybe we
> do.
>
>
>Bill,
I'm getting real happy with this one. The Pultec is one of my essentials
around here just because it has such an organic vibe to it. the Neve has
this same thing going on, but it's a lot more flexible. I've got a song mix
happening right now with 18 x UAD-1 plugins instantiated, 13 of which are
pretty CPU intensive. I've got a Pultec, Multiband and 1176 on the bass bus,
Pultecs and 1176's on both beater and shell kick tracks, 1176's on a pair of
toms, Neves and 1176's on top and bottom snare, LA-2A on vocal and Neves on
4 acoustic guitar tracks.. The UAD-1 resource usage is around 56% on 4 x
UAD-1 cards.
Deej
"Bill Lorentzen" <bill@lorentzen.ws> wrote in message news:4481c3c6@linux...
> Wow. I am really impressed with the 1073. It is one of the few digital EQs
> that has the muscle of an analog EQ. Gonna need this one. Probably need an
> extra card too.
>
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
> news:447fb61b@linux...
> > Neve???? We don'need no steeenkin' Neve!!.......erm.......well, maybe we
> > do.
> >
> >
> >
>
>When you say the center of the cabs should be at right angles you mean facing
straight back and not angled directly at the ear?
I have researched many diagrams and the most common one is the 60degree equalateral
triangle. This is recommended as follows:
1.Speaker centers 4-6 feet apart.
2.Listener positioned in an equalateral triangular position.
3.Speaker cab centers angled to point just behind the head of the listener
(directly at each ear).
EK Sound <askme@nospam.com> wrote:
>Ideally, the speaker should be as far away from your ears as they are
>apart from each other (equal sided triangle). Also, the cabinets
>should be aiming at you with the center of the cabinet at right angles
>to your head. This means that if you have the cabinets sitting lower
>than your head, you should tilt them up slightly, and tilt down if
>they are over your head.
>
>Just a rule of thumb... YMMV
>
>David.
>
>Brandon wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> According to the manual these were designed to be placed in a vertical
>> position. I have read articles on speaker placement and they say most
speakers
>> are designed to have the listeners ear at a level height with the tweeter
>> OR level with the space between the tweeter and the woofer. I notice that
>> the phantom center shifts up and down in front of me as I change my ear
level
>> in relation to the tweeters. It is written that there is an optimal listening
>> position when considering phase relation between the tweeter and the woofer.
>> I wrote to Mackie and there response was:
>>
>> "As long as you are a descent distance away from the cabinets, a meter
>> or so, I don't think it matters. Put them in a horizontal plane with
>> your head and stay a good bit away from them. You should be fine. msp"
>>
>> This response goes against how the speakers were designed to be mounted
and
>> listened thru.....So........
>> Does anyone know the optimal positioning?and why?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> BrandonAll,
I know a few of you have made your own computer enclosures with soundproofing
design to quiet the control room.
Do any of you still have the plans you used?
I am interested to see your designs and hear from you how they worked. I
am fixing to build a new control room desk and was going to incorporate a
computer enclosure in the bottom of it.
Thanks,
BrandonI never found a good enclosure so my pc is on the other side of two walls
10" apart with 2 sheets of drywall on the outside of each wall. This is
totally silent. And the MEC is on a 20' SCSI cable. I would love a SILENT
enclosure.
John
"Brandon" <you@your.domain> wrote:
>
>All,
>
>I know a few of you have made your own computer enclosures with soundproofing
>design to quiet the control room.
>Do any of you still have the plans you used?
>I am interested to see your designs and hear from you how they worked. I
>am fixing to build a new control room desk and was going to incorporate
a
>computer enclosure in the bottom of it.
>Thanks,
>
>BrandonI more inclined to think the USB is control port only, but I coudn't confirm
that either.
Besides, the last thing you need is more tentacles on the octopus. Just say
no man.
AA
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
news:4481bad6@linux...
> It's got ADAT and spdif I/O and USB ports but no PCI .
> Sooooo.............if
> you connect it to a computer using it's USB port, can you access UAD
> cards,
> patch the ADAT I/O into the Paris ADAT I/O, set up a Paris PB scenario
> wherein the ADAT I/O is routed to different inserts and auxes and then
> process Paris tracks using UAD-1 hardware with zero latency?
>
>
> "Paul Artola" <artola@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:4ps182lqijgopurtdgibdig363g5ido8j6@4ax.com...
>> I have one and simply love it. Morgan gave me a great deal on a base
>> model, and I upgraded the RAM and harddrive for pretty cheap.
>>
>> I mostly use the soft synths, and there are so many nice free ones
>> that come with it, that I have yet so shell out money for any
>> commercial ones.
>>
>> It comes with a bunch of nice effects too, and what is really cool is
>> that you can plug in a guitar/bass into a DI port and use the effects
>> directly with the instrument.
>>
>> If you are a gigging musician who would like to get some VST(i) into
>> your act but have problems lugging a computer around, the Receptor is
>> worth consideration. Big name acts are taking racks of these things on
>> the road now, and it is really catching on.
>>
>> - Paul Artola
>> Ellicott City, Maryland
>>
>> On 3 Jun 2006 06:37:43 +1000, "Chris Lang" <yo@yo.yo> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >www.museresearch.com
>> >
>> >Looks like the Receptor can do both effects and instruments.
>> >
>> >It looks really cool, but a good unit with enough memory and
>> >RAM is two grand at Musician's Friend.
>> >
>> >Anyway, FYI.
>> >
>> >peace,
>> >
>> >Chris
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>> >>No, there was a hardware rack mount box out there that ran VST's, I
> remember
>> >
>> >>seeing it intro'd just before a NAMM I think.. but I cannot for the
>> >>life
>> >of
>> >>me remember the name or if it actually made production.
>> >>
>> >>AA
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> >>news:44808409$1@linux...
>> >>>
>> >>> Guess there aren't any, eh?
>> >>>
>> >>> Gantt
>> >>>
>> >>> "Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>I've been fooling around w/ the Waves IR-L reverb and I like it. I
> have
>> >>> a
>> >>>>client who loves the idea of picking reverbs by names like "The
> Viennese
>> >>>>Opera Hall - row 7, center". Wierd, eh? Are there any convolution
>> >>>>or
>> >
>> >>>>sampled
>> >>>>reverbs that work w/ Paris?
>> >>>>Wasn't there once a box that let you run VST plugins in real time as
> an
>> >>> outboard
>> >>>>effect?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Gantt
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>I choo
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
