|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Family Album, Ver. 1 [message #84473 is a reply to message #84467] |
Sun, 13 May 2007 15:46   |
Rich Lamanna
 Messages: 316 Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;audioguy_editout_@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:4668e52d@linux...
> Yep, the DM2K pre's are all that... I was quite stunned the first time I
> dialed them up... I knew they were supposed to be good, just wasn't
> expecting Great! 24 of them in the desk is just a bonus.
>
> David.
>
> LaMont wrote:
>> Bill, I sometimes work at a studio which uses the Yammy Dm-2000. The
>> studio
>> has avalons, neves, UADs, but long story short, when we compared those
>> other
>> pres with the DM-2000, we choose the DM-2000 for the every day go to
>> Pre..
&g
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Family Album, Ver. 1 [message #84495 is a reply to message #84483] |
Sun, 13 May 2007 21:46   |
Kim
Messages: 1246 Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
s never a bad idea), try & get it to
>>duplicate without guinea-pigging your next client to find it -
>>record yourself singing with the exact same setup... just sing
>>something/anything accapella for about 4-5 minutes & see if any
>>of the same kind of noises show up on the recorded track. If it
>>does, switch mics & do it again, then search for noises... if
>>they still show up, switch preamps & try it again & so on.
>>IOW, process of elimination... if the noises show up no matter
>>what part of the signal chain you switch out, then it could be
>>power, or clocking, or ???
>>
>>But honestly, if this
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Family Album, Ver. 1 [message #84541 is a reply to message #84524] |
Mon, 14 May 2007 11:32   |
rick
 Messages: 1976 Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
>>> i seem to remember an enginner, while describing
>>> thie bake (no shake) technique, saying that it had to do
>>> with removing any accumulated humidity and getting
>>> those little particles to stand up straight.
>>> a "real" engineer could give you the straight dope on
>>> this. i am sure that you can only bake your tape once,
>>> and you'd better have a way to store the data immediately-- curiously
>
>>> again,
>>> just like freeze drying a hard disc.
>>> jp
>>>
>>> "erlilo" <erlingl@tdcadsl.dk> wrote:
>>>>To bake a cake, sorry, a tape;-), wasn't it to get rid of the copy effect
>>> we
>>>>often heard before the tune started?
>>>>
>>>>Erling
>>>>
>>>>"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> skrev i en meddelelse
>>>>news:46690c43@linux...
>>>>> What is funny, is that you "freeze"drives to get the data from it,
but
>>> you
>>>>> '"bake" audio tapes to get the data from them.....
>>>>> Who woulda thought??
>>>>> --
>>>>> Martin Harrington
>>>>> www.lendanear-sound.com
>>>>> 0414 913 247
>>>>>
>>>>> "jp" <jpj@jpjones.net> wrote in message news:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|