|
|
| Re: Temporary Acoustic Treatment with Moving Blankets? [message #67578 is a reply to message #67577] |
Wed, 03 May 2006 05:37   |
Don Nafe
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I have a bass track that this band I'm recording is happy with
>>>>>>>>the sound of, but I personally think sucks... OK, maybe I
>>>>>>>>should say it a different way: "They like it, but I think they
>>>>>>>>might like it even better if I could improve upon it :D
>>>>>>>>How's that for politically correct? lol
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Anyway, I'm thinking about reamping it or maybe Sans-amp-ing it,
>>>>>>>>but here's my question: If I pick up a Bass Sansamp, I know the
>>>>>>>>input isn't designed for line-level stuff, so if I run the
>>>>>>>>signal out of a line-level out on my convertors, then through a
>>>>>>>>mic pre that also has a line-level input and also an output
>>>>>>>>level control (of which I have a few), can I just feed a very
&
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Temporary Acoustic Treatment with Moving Blankets? [message #67580 is a reply to message #67578] |
Wed, 03 May 2006 06:08 |
IOUOI
Messages: 38
Registered: June 2007
|
Member |
|
|
;>>that for an achievement? lol Totally my fault, though -
>>>>>>>>despite the band insisting they liked it, I should have at
>>>>>>>>least taken a direct feed though a preamp or direct box on
>>>>>>>>another channel, as well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Neil
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>or burst into flames... which ever comes first! ;-)
David.
DJ wrote:
> I just ordered one of these from MF. I want to A/B it against my *go to*
> bass DI which is an Avalon 737. I'm gonna give it 45 days to infatuate me.
>
> ;o)
>
> "john" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:44735027$1@linux...
>
>>Ymmv but my sansamp was crap tonewise and this Ampeg preamp has totally
>
> infatuated
>
>>me. You need to try them but I will never have a sans amp again. The
>
> tone
>
>>to me is totally amateurish and not even at all plus low signal output.
>>How sucky is that?
>>John
>>
>>"justcron" <paris@hydrorecords.com> wrote:
>>
>>>haha no it doesn't
>>>
>>>And Neil... I dont think thats a good idear...
>>>
>>>"john" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:4472fa19$1@linux...
>>>
>>>>sans-amp sucks. i sold mine on ebay and bought the Ampeg SVPCL for
>
> $350
>
>>>>used.
>>>>Awesome! The tone is EVEN and LOW where the sansamp is neither.
>>>> http://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAMM04/Content/Ampeg/PR/SVP CL.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I have a bass track that this band I'm recording is happy with
>>>>>the sound of, but I personally think sucks... OK, maybe I
>>>>>should say it a different way: "They like it, but I think they
>>>>>might like it even better if I could improve upon it :D
>>>>>How's that for politically correct? lol
>>>>>
>>>>>Anyway, I'm thinking about reamping it or maybe Sans-amp-ing it,
>>>>>but here's my question: If I pick up a Bass Sansamp, I know the
>>>>>input isn't designed for l
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Temporary Acoustic Treatment with Moving Blankets? [message #67585 is a reply to message #67584] |
Wed, 03 May 2006 07:22 |
Paul
Messages: 14
Registered: June 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
, but I think they
>> >>>might like it even better if I could improve upon it :D
>> >>>How's that for politically correct? lol
>> >>>
>> >>>Anyway, I'm thinking about reamping it or maybe Sans-amp-ing it,
>> >>>but here's my question: If I pick up a Bass Sansamp, I know the
>> >>>input isn't designed for line-level stuff, so if I run the
>> >>>signal out of a line-level out on my convertors, then through a
>> >>>mic pre that also has a line-level input and also an output
>> >>>level control (of which I have a few), can I just feed a very
>> >>>low level out of the preamp into the Sansamp input, or will I
>> >>>run into impedance issues with this method?
>> >>>
>> >>>Reamping's no problem - I can easily rig that up, so if this
>> >>>other option doesn't work, I can always fall back on that, but
>> >>>for another choice, would a Sansamp box work in this instance?
>> >>>
>> >>>Problem is "Farty distortion", BTW. It may take a re-tracking
>> >>>with a better input chain than the bass player's Carvin head
>> >>>line-out jack, but I want to at least investigate other options
>> >>>first. Worst bass sound I ever permitted to go to track... how's
>> >>>that for an achievement? lol Totally my fault, though -
>> >>>despite the band insisting they liked it, I should have at
>> >>>least taken a direct feed though a preamp or direct box on
>> >>>another channel, as well.
>> >>>
>> >>>Neil
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>I don't now how much heat it puts out but fir
|
|
|
|
| Re: Temporary Acoustic Treatment with Moving Blankets? [message #67587 is a reply to message #67585] |
Wed, 03 May 2006 08:02 |
Don Nafe
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
oD
>
>"john" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:4472fa19$1@linux...
>>
>> sans-amp sucks. i sold mine on ebay and bought the Ampeg SVPCL for $350
>used.
>> Awesome! The tone is EVEN and LOW where the sansamp is neither.
>> http://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAMM04/Content/Ampeg/PR/SVP CL.html
>>
>>
>>
>> "Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >I have a bass track that this band I'm recording is happy with
>> >the sound of, but I personally think sucks... OK, maybe I
>> >should say it a different way: "They like it, but I think they
>> >might like it even better if I could improve upon it :D
>> >How's that for politically correct? lol
>> >
>> >Anyway, I'm thinking about reamping it or maybe Sans-amp-ing it,
>> >but here's my question: If I pick up a Bass Sansamp, I know the
>> >input isn't designed for line-level stuff, so if I run the
>> >signal out of a line-level out on my convertors, then through a
>> >mic pre that also has a line-level input and also an output
>> >level control (of which I have a few), can I just feed a very
>> >low level out of the preamp into the Sansamp input, or will I
>> >run into impedance issues with this method?
>> >
>> >Reamping's no problem - I can easily rig that up, so if this
>> >other option doesn't work, I can always fall back on that, but
>> >for another choice, would a Sansamp box work in this instance?
>> >
>> >Problem is "Farty distortion", BTW. It may take a re-tracking
>> >with a better input chain than the bass player's Carvin head
>> >line-out jack, but I want to at least investigate other options
>> >first. Worst bass sound I ever permitted to go to track... how's
>> >that for an achievement? lol Totally my fault, though -
>> >despite the band insisting they liked it, I should have at
>> >least taken a direct feed though a preamp or direct box on
>> >another channel, as well.
>> >
>> >Neil
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>Thanks - I'll have to try this and add it my Dimitrios tricks and tips file!!
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>
>Hi to all Parisians.
>Some of you may know this little trick...
>Seelect 80 hz in Paris Eq and using a 0.1 Q control add 12-18 db's !
>You will get instant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Temporary Acoustic Treatment with Moving Blankets? [message #67639 is a reply to message #67613] |
Thu, 04 May 2006 04:30 |
Paul
Messages: 14
Registered: June 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
/>
> > > =
> > > >Pro=20
> > > > on? I love the EQP-1a</FONT></DIV>
> > > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>on bass, kick and a tom or two
=
> > > >from time to=20
> > > > time. I question</FONT></DIV>
> > > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>the crazy midrange that this
Pro
> > > =
> > > >unit will=20
> > > > offer. E. guitar perhaps?</FONT></DIV>
> > > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Sent you a
tidbit.</FONT></DIV>
> > > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
> > > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > > > <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
> > > > style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT:
5px;
> > > =
> > > >BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> > > > <DIV>"DJ" <<A=20
> > > > =
> > >
> >
>
>href=3D"mailto:animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net">animix_spam-this-ahole=
> > > >_@animas.net</A>>=20
> > > > wrote in message <A=20
> > > > href=3D"news:44768c80@linux">news:44768c80@linux</A>...</DIV>
> > > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Nope</FONT></DIV>
> > > > <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
> > > > style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT:
=
> > > >5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> > > > <DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
> > > > =
> > > >href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> wrote in
=
> > > >
> > > > message <A =
> > > >href=3D"news:44768792@linux">news:44768792@linux</A>...</DIV>
> > > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>DJ,</FONT></DIV>
> > > > <DIV><FONT face=3
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
