Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OK........I've had enough of this
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK........I've had enough of this [message #95498 is a reply to message #95497] |
Mon, 04 February 2008 02:03   |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ad what your success/failure
>> was like in each condition, and once I have enough info I'll go ahead and
>> create something similar for each plugin.
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> - Kerry
>>
>> PS: no need to upload FX presets quite yet, I want to sort the best format
>> options out first so all users regardless of OS or PARIS version can make
>> immediate use of the presets.
>>
>> PPS: If you think of other types of PARIS-related files it might be handy
>> to
>> create upload/download functionality for on the Wiki - PARIS wallpaper,
>> skins, track sheets, tables, cheatsheets - I'm happy to entertain
>> suggestions.
>>
>> - K.
>>
>
>Motherboard, chipset, video card chip, memory/brand&amount, CPU
socket/speed/model, PCI cards in use. motherboard onboard devices. Network.
Firewire. USB. All use IRQ's, play a role. Firewire port shouldn't have
networking enabled, it polls. The amount of EDS cards is directly involved
in how you want to set your configs.
Hard drives (SCSI, IDE, SATA, rotation speed/cache/size/brand) all play a
role.
Magma/SBS expansion likely plays a role.
What kinds of applications (MS Office for example, big no no IMO on a DAW)
plays a part.
Start up group. DX and VST plugs. Automatic updates. Remote
desktop/invitations. Native or 3rd party drivers ( fo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK........I've had enough of this [message #95502 is a reply to message #95499] |
Mon, 04 February 2008 09:20 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
sets.
>>>
>>> PPS: If you think of other types of PARIS-related files it might be
>>> handy
>>> to
>>> create upload/download functionality for on the Wiki - PARIS wallpaper,
>>> skins, track sheets, tables, cheatsheets - I'm happy to entertain
>>> suggestions.
>>>
>>> - K.
>>>
>>
>>
>Wash your car and water your lawn real well before you call him. :>
Seriously, if it gets expensive I'm sure a collection would probably be
taken up. Let us know.
AA
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4806f710$1@linux...
>
>
> Funny you should say that you know, because when you call the fault line
> there is an option to test your line before talking to anybody. I selected
> that and after a few seconds it said "This function is currently
> unavailable"
> and I moved on, and yet once I spoke with somebody they offered to test
> it.
> Perhaps their tests aren't working?
>
> That said, they are not debating that there is a fault.
>
> I can ring them back now and hammer them a bit more. I've tested a few
> pieces
> of gear and nothing works properly, and the other "tell all" is t
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK........I've had enough of this [message #95503 is a reply to message #95495] |
Mon, 04 February 2008 10:43 |
|
|
hat I can
> kinda tell from the weather and time of day whether it will be working. If
> it's midday and sunny and 25C then it's fine, but if it's 6am and raining
> then it will barely connect. That's usually a cable issue for mi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK........I've had enough of this [message #95523 is a reply to message #95518] |
Mon, 04 February 2008 20:25 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ell for an old timer. Nice to have a couple of
boxes to divide the work.
Next week I'll tackle installing all the Native Instruments stuff onto
the MBP.
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.comVary cool to hear Jamie. And you have the option to add up to a 30" monitor
if you want to expand your desk top. My next Mac may not be a Mac. Apple
needs a sub $1,000.00 tower.
Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>
>I'm slowly integrating the new Macbook Pro into the workflow (thanks
>Chris!). Logic 8 runs great on it. 4GB RAM, 512 graphics RAM, 250GB HD,
>2 firewire and three USB2 ports, expansion port, HiDef LED-lit display
>and OSX 10.5.
>
>Right now I'm using it to animate and edit a 20 minute video project
>using a variety of 2D and 2D software and FCP. Haven't done any head to
>head tests against the dual G5 yet but it feels a bit faster, and on a
>quick, non-scientific 3D rendering test it was about 10-15% faster,
>although the G5 was also running more other stuff at the time.
>
>As far as OSX 10.5, pretty cool so far. I'm glad Apple finally got
>around to supporting multiple desktops, I've been missing that since BeOS...
>
>So my preliminary conclusions are that the MBP is a nice laptop, and the
>G5 still does pretty well for an old timer. Nice to have a couple of
>boxes to divide the work.
>
>Next week I'll tackle installing all the Native Instruments stuff onto
>the MBP.
>
>Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.comKerry, I don't think Thad has a problem with his being an artist.
Actually I do think we all have a responsibility to say what we believe
and what we think will be of value to others. Great artists have
powerful voices and they absolutely should communicate for the
betterment of society and the future of the civilization. Frankly I
would much rather hear heart felt opinions from an intelligent actor
like Tim Robbins (Erik the Viking!) than the compromised party line we
hear from most pragmatic politicians.
Has anyone been watching the John Adams HBO series? Even at the birth of
our Republic we had bankers' pawns like Hamilton scheming to put the
country into debt with an expensive army and war.
Kerry Galloway wrote:
> Wait a sec. Aren't the bulk of PARIS NG contributors "artists" too, pretty
> much by definition?
>
> :D
>
> - Kerry
>
>
> On 4/17/08 1:49 PM, in article 4807b7be$1@linux, "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I agree with a fair bit of the NAB speech, but I find 'artists' going on about
>> politics insufferable. If they really care
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK........I've had enough of this [message #95531 is a reply to message #95518] |
Mon, 04 February 2008 21:33 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
r />
to get in the sub $1000 world.
Chris
James McCloskey wrote:
> Vary cool to hear Jamie. And you have the option to add up to a 30" monitor
> if you want to expand your desk top. My next Mac may not be a Mac. Apple
> needs a sub $1,000.00 tower.
>
> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm slowly integrating the new Macbook Pro into the workflow (thanks
>> Chris!). Logic 8 runs great on it. 4GB RAM, 512 graphics RAM, 250GB HD,
>>
>
>
>> 2 firewire and three USB2 ports, expansion port, HiDef LED-lit display
>> and OSX 10.5.
>>
>> Right now I'm using it to animate and edit a 20 minute video project
>> using a variety of 2D and 2D software and FCP. Haven't done any head to
>>
>
>
>> head tests against the dual G5 yet but it feels a bit faster, and on a
>> quick, non-scientific 3D rendering test it was about 10-15% faster,
>> although the G5 was also running more other stuff at the time.
>>
>> As far as OSX 10.5, pretty cool so far. I'm glad Apple finally got
>> around to supporting multiple desktops, I've been missing that since BeOS...
>>
>> So my preliminary conclusions are that the MBP is a nice laptop, and the
>>
>
>
>> G5 still does pretty well for an old timer. Nice to have a couple of
>> boxes to divide the work.
>>
>> Next week I'll tackle installing all the Native Instruments stuff onto
>> the MBP.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Jamie
>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>
>
--
Chris Ludwig
ADK
chrisl@adkproaudio.com <mailto:chrisl@adkproaudio.com>
www.adkproaudio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
(859) 635-5762Chris, I'm glad you recognize Apples quality when it comes to components.
In the PC world, when you look at a SOYO MOBO and an Intel MOBO there is
a definite difference in price, and I assume quality. Apple as I know it,
is using Intel MOBOs in their lap tops and I guess desk tops??? With all
the stuff Apple is having built in the FoxConn Plant in China, and all of
the defective iPods out of the box I hear about, I have to think Apple's
quality is not quite what it once was. I believe Apple still has reasonably
good quality, however. I for one, think their prices should reflect their
savings, but that is a whole other subject.
Yes, I would like Apple to keep their quality up. Chris, you starting to
sound like a Apple salesman: ) Have you been drinking the Kool-Aid? :
) I hope you know I'm just kidding you. I'm glad your on board with the
Mac thing.
There
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK........I've had enough of this [message #95533 is a reply to message #95531] |
Mon, 04 February 2008 22:59 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
550.00.
Here is a picture of the Mac clone, it comes in white and black.
http://www.psystar.com/communications_network_and_management _products.html
http://www.news.com/8301-13579_3-9921271-37.html
It sounds like they had to move in the middle of the night, last night:
)
Chris Ludwig <chrisl@adkproaudio.com> wrote:
>HI James,
>They really need to have a single socket board that will take a quad
>core. There is such a huge gap in choices. For most people the 8 cores
>are just total over kill.
>I'd like to see them do a small mid tower and give the IMac some balls.
>All it is a laptop in a bigger monitor. They should at least put a
>fricking express slot on it.
>They could easily put a desktop based chipset in it instead and use
>desktop quad cores instead of laptop cpu. Single socket Quad cores
>especially the new 9450 Penyrn based CPUs are awesome.
>They have more way more horse power than the Dual Xeons did. I think
>they could get a powerful desktop setup in the $1500 to $1800 that would
>rival the high end PC gamer, audio and video systems.
>I really don't think they can ever deliver a sub $1000 machine that will
>compete with PCs in the same price and still keep their level of
>component quality that they seem to want to care about.
>Do you really want them to become a Gateway, Dell, Compaq, etc?
>If they really wanted to push the envelope and take on MS for real they
>need to make OSX officially work on any PC and let manufacturers like
>HP, DELL, etc offer it on their machines. That is the only way for it
>to get in the sub $1000 world.
>
>Chris
>
>
>James McCloskey wrote:
>> Vary cool to hear Jamie. And you have the option to add up to a 30" monitor
>> if you want to expand your desk top. My next Mac may not be a Mac. Apple
>> needs a sub $1,000.00 tower.
>>
>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm slowly integrating the new Macbook Pro into the workflow (thanks
>>> Chris!). Logic 8 runs great on it. 4GB RAM, 512 graphics RAM, 250GB HD,
>>>
>>
>>
>>> 2 firewire and three USB2 ports, expansion port, HiDef LED-lit display
>>> and OSX 10.5.
>>>
>>> Right now I'm using it to animate and edit a 20 minute video project
>>> using a variety of 2D and 2D software and FCP. Haven't done any head
to
>>>
>>
>>
>>> head tests against the dual G5 yet but it feels a bit faster, and on
a
>>> quick, non-scientific 3D rendering test it was about 10-15% faster,
>>> although the G5 was also running more other stuff at the time.
>>>
>>> As far as OSX 10.5, pretty cool so far. I'm glad Apple finally got
>>> around to supporting multiple desktops, I've been missing that since
BeOS...
>>>
>>> So my preliminary conclusions are that the MBP is a nice laptop, and
the
>>>
>>
>>
>>> G5 still does pretty well for an old timer. Nice to have a couple of
>>> boxes to divide the work.
>>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK........I've had enough of this [message #95535 is a reply to message #95533] |
Mon, 04 February 2008 22:02 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
35-5762Adobe, that bought Cool Edit, can do the same thing with the old CE PAF
filter in the map with Audition 1, 2 and 3.
Erling
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> skrev i en meddelelse
news:4807dd99$1@linux...
> Wavelab does PAF, and old versions of Cool Edit. Not sure who else.
>
> AA
>
> "Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:48075c41$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> If there are a bunch of edits and overdubs in the Paris project you'll
>> need
>> to bounce the tracks on a Paris system. If the tracks are contiguous raw
>> tracks you can use Peak or Soniqworx (I' a Mac dude - don't know what the
>> PC equivalents are) to convert from .paf to .wav. If you need help feel
>> free to email me.
>>
>> Gantt
>>
>> "Jeffrey Carruthers" <digitalzoo@socal.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi, I'm sure this is a tired question but it never came up for me yet:
>>>
>>>I've searched the thread on the Paris news group and wonder if anyone can
>>>help.
>>>A client had recorded an album on a Paris system 10 years ago and now
>>>wants
>>>to
>>>try and open the files and work in protools.
>>>
>>>Is there anyway to open a Paris session in Protools?
>>>
>>>Is there a way to convert .paf audio files to .wav 24bit / 44.1K
>>>
>>>Is it possible to 'spot' the .paf audio files in protools
>>>
>>>If my only choice is to find someone with a Paris system to do the
>>>conversion,
>>>what should I expect to pay per song? (5min x 24 tracks)
>>>
>>>
>>>thank you,
>>>
>>>Jeff Carruthers
>>>Digital Zoo Music
>>>digitalzoo@socal.rr.com
>>>www.digitalzoomusic.com
>>>
>>
>
>James McCloskey wrote:
> Aaron, I'm curious about what you and Jamie are using for your video production
> rigs. What cameras, lighting etc. I've done wedding videos in the past
> with mini DV cameras and I'm thinking about getting back in for supplemental
> income. If you guys have time shoot me an email.
I'm not in the event/wedding market, although I've shot a couple of
weddings for friends but not recently.
For our wedding a few years back we passed a Panasonic DVX100 around (we
have talented friends) and we had a wireless mic to pick up the
important words up front and to catch the sound of the small orchestra
and the air canons (yes, it was an unusual wedding). It was outdoors so
lighting was by the sun.
Anyway, there are a lot of options for event video gear. Start with
Canon, Sony, Panasonic in DV or HDV. Any of the models with XLR audio
inputs are worth considering, (and maybe a few that don't, for B-roll).
Or go tapeless with the latest formats from Sony and Panasonic, or via a
hard drive recorder. At events, you won't get much chance to do
controlled lighting so choose a camera with good low light performance.
I would think a hi-def format would give you a marketing edge. Use a
tripod when you can. Wireless mics on or near the participants would be
a good thing. Great pictures aren't enough if you can't hear what's
going on.
I've used a lot of editing systems. Currently I edit with Final Cut Pro
on the G5 or the new laptop.
Feel free to email if I can help with any questions.
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>> If you're still seriou
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK........I've had enough of this [message #95536 is a reply to message #95531] |
Mon, 04 February 2008 22:02 |
Tony Benson
Messages: 453
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
s about building an XP box for Paris, I'm still
>> onboard to help you configure it up, if you run into any snags.
>> .
>> AA
>>
>>
>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4807ff5e$1@linux...
>>> Vary cool to hear Jamie. And you have the option to add up to a 30"
>>> monitor
>>> if you want to expand your desk top. My next Mac may not be a Mac. Apple
>>> needs a sub $1,000.00 tower.
>>>
>>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm slowly integrating the new Macbook Pro into the workflow (thanks
>>>> Chris!). Logic 8 runs great on it. 4GB RAM, 512 graphics RAM, 250GB HD,
>>>> 2 firewire and three USB2 ports, expansion port, HiDef LED-lit display
>>>> and OSX 10.5.
>>>>
>>>> Right now I'm using it to animate and edit a 20 minute video project
>>>> using a variety of 2D and 2D software and FCP. Haven't done any head to
>>>> head tests against the dual G5 yet but it feels a bit faster, and on a
>>>> quick, non-scientific 3D rendering test it was about 10-15% faster,
>>>> although the G5 was also running more other stuff at the time.
>>>>
>>>> As far as OSX 10.5, pretty cool so far. I'm glad Apple finally got
>>>> around to supporting multiple desktops, I've been missing that since
>>>> BeOS...
>>>>
>>>> So my preliminary conclusions are that the MBP is a nice laptop, and the
>>>> G5 still does pretty well for an old timer. Nice to have a couple of
>>>> boxes to divide the work.
>>>>
>>>> Next week I'll tackle installing all the Native Instruments stuff onto
>>>> the MBP.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> -Jamie
>>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>Hi Alex - Could you tell me where to find -convert audio pitch to midi -
feature in cubase? I can't find it - i have sx 3 and 4- this would be very
handy even if just monophonic . I wasnt able to find any hits on the web or
manual either.
Thanks
-b
"alex plasko" <alex.plasko@snet.net> wrote in message
news:47ed5d2c$1@linux...
> Cubase does convert audio file pitch to midi and therefore transcription
> ,but not polyphonic.
> Celemony melodyne does the same.
> I don't think you can do it at this point. maybe when the new melodyne is
> released ?that should do it because it breaks down chords into the
> individual notes, but you will still have to discern which note is the
> guitar and which note is the clarinet.
> Id say to use your ears and a pencil and paper at this point.
> "D.P." <ottawarocks@netscape.net> wrote in message news:47ed1abc@linux...
>>I know there's a lot of Cubase knowledge around here, so I thought I'd
>>ask...
>>
>> I have a recording of a duo (acoustic guitar and clarinet). This is a
>> mix, so just a stereo track. I have no way to separate the clarinet from
>> the guitar.
>>
>> I need a transcription of the clarinet parts. On paper, you know with a
>> staff and notes in standard notation.
>>
>> This is either an exercise in writing out the notes... or using a tool to
>> do it.
>>
>> Anyone know if Cubase can do that? This would be a double challenge,
>> because first, I need to somehow "isolate" the clarinet (i.e. get rid of
>> the guitar) before proceeding to running a software tool to spit out the
>> transcription.
>>
>> Any ideas? Am I dreaming in la-la land? I'm sure the second half of my
>> challenge is possible... just not sure about "erasing" the g
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK........I've had enough of this [message #95541 is a reply to message #95536] |
Mon, 04 February 2008 22:35 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;>
>> Neil
>Sounds like you're in good shape with your experience and education.
What to buy depends on the results you want and how much you want to spend.
The tech changes constantly, much like computers. If you want the
security of shooting tape and your budget is under $10k, for SD I still
like the Panasonic DVX100. For HD/SD, the Canon HDV XHA1. Both can do 24
frame progressive - something I use but event shoots probably wouldn't
require that.
For tapeless, the new EX1 is a big step forward for Sony but with a
couple of out-of-the-gate problems. Rolling shutter issues could cause
problems for fast action or concerts, there were also some vignetting
problems, but otherwise it's impressive for the $. Panasonic has the P2
cams, I thought the HVX200 was too noisy in low light but there's an
update announced.
Google around for the current NAB news. New stuff is coming from
everyone. Panasonic looks interesting again with several tapeless format
options. Red is promising something beyond HD to compete with the above
in a year or so.
Replying from the new laptop. ;^)
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
James McCloskey wrote:
> Hi Jamie! First, I feel like I hi-jacked your thread, sorry. It's great
> that you got a new MBP! Keep us posted.
>
> Thanks for your reply. I guess I should have qualified myself a bit more.
> I've done a bit more than just wedding videos. I went to school for film
> production at the Center for Creative studies. I also studied film and video
> production at UCLA and UC Irvine. I was also a NAB member in the past.
> I've done film and video production in the past, but I've been out of it
> for a while. I'm hip to most of the prosumer cameras etc., but I wanted
> to get your opinions on what you like and so on. The big question is which
> HD format to go with and why?
>
> I will be using FCP Studio 2 on a Mac, and ULead Studio or maybe Vegas 6
> on a PC.
>
> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>> James McCloskey wrote:
>>> Aaron, I'm curious about what you and Jamie are using for your video production
>>> rigs. What cameras, lighting etc. I've done wedding videos in the past
>>> with mini DV cameras and I'm thinking about getting back in for supplemental
>>> income. If you guys have time shoot me an email.
>> I'm not in the event/wedding market, although I've shot a couple of
>> weddings for friends but not recently.
>>
>> For our wedding a few years back we passed a Panasonic DVX100 around (we
>
>> have talented friends) and we had a wireless mic to pick up the
>> important words up front and to catch the sound of the small orchestra
>> and the air canons (yes, it was an unusual wedding). It was outdoors so
>
>> lighting was by the sun.
>>
>> Anyway, there are a lot of options for event video gear. Start with
>> Canon, Sony, Panasonic in DV or HDV. Any of the models with XLR audio
>> inputs are worth considering, (and maybe a few that don't, for B-roll).
>
>> Or go tapeless with the latest formats from Sony and Panasonic, or via a
>
>> hard drive recorder. At events, you won't get much chance to do
>> controlled lighting so choose a camera with good low light performance.
>>
>> I would think a hi-def format would give you a marketing edge. Use a
>> tripod when you can. Wireless mics on or near the participants would be
>
>> a good thing. Great pictures aren't enough if you can't hear what's
>> going on.
>>
>> I've used a lot of editing systems. Currently I edit with Final Cut Pro
>
>> on the G5 or the new laptop.
>>
>> Feel free to email if I can help with any questions.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Jamie
>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>>
>>
>>> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>> If you're still serious about building an XP box for Paris, I'm still
>
>>>> onboard to help you configure it up, if you run into any snags.
>>>> .
>>>> AA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:4807ff5e$1@linux...
>>>>> Vary cool to hear Jamie. And you have the option to add up to a 30"
>
>>>>> monitor
>>>>> if you want to expand your desk top. My next Mac may not be a Mac.
> Apple
>>>>> needs a sub $1,000.00 tower.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I'm slowly integrating the new Macbook Pro into the workflow (thanks
>>>>>> Chris!). Logic 8 runs great on it. 4GB RAM, 512 graphics RAM, 250GB
> HD,
>>>>>> 2 firewire and three USB2 ports, expansion port, HiDef LED-lit display
>>>>>> and OSX 10.5.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right now I'm using it to animate and edit a 20 minute video project
>>>>>> using a variety of 2D and 2D software and FCP. Haven't done any head
> to
>>>>>> head tests against the dual G5 yet but it feels a bit faster, and on
> a
>>>>>> quick, non-scientific 3D rendering test it was about 10-15% faster,
>>>>>> although the G5 was also running more other stuff at the time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as OSX 10.5, pretty cool so far. I'm glad Apple finally got
>>>>>> around to supporting multiple desktops, I've been missing that since
>
>>>>>> BeOS...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So my preliminary conclusions are that the MBP is a nice laptop, and
> the
>>>>>> G5 still does pretty well for an old timer. Nice to have a couple of
>>>>>> boxes to divide the work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Next week I'll tackle installing all the Native Instruments stuff onto
>>>>>> the MBP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> -Jamie
>>>>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>I'm still in the throes of specing that out for my work environment, so it's
going to be a while... gummint moves slow. For my personal stuff I intake DV
video via firewire into my new machine, an Intel Quad 6600 system. I'm still
using an old version of Vegas then that gets blown to DVD-R. I don't really
do production professional video anymore, so I'm sure I'm behind the curve.
That said, Vegas is very easy and very powerful for the home/semi-pro user
and won't cost and arm and a leg like an Avid or Grass Valley type setup.
AA
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:480820cf$Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun May 10 21:47:45 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04057 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
