Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » More guitar geekdom
| More guitar geekdom [message #92468] |
Wed, 07 November 2007 08:36  |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
v0f5IQqn+w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|
|
|
|
| Re: More guitar geekdom [message #92471 is a reply to message #92468] |
Wed, 07 November 2007 11:53  |
|
|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Gantt Kushner
Gizmo Recording Company
Silver Spring, MD
www.gizmorecording.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: More guitar geekdom [message #92560 is a reply to message #92552] |
Thu, 08 November 2007 21:42 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
arpet hurting the mids somewhat. What about thick
cloth? This cloth doesn't appear to be dense, but it's got a kind of backing
sponge. I suspect that even 2-4k would pass through alright, which might
just get me to tweeter territory...
Other options include just getting some color keyed paint and painting the
speaker grills or whatever to make it look like it belongs. Mmm.
Any general stories on how you guys have handled car stereos would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Kim.The Sixx AM release. True enough, the mental material is depressing and
dark, but the sound has just got to be analog. Anyone in the know, ...
well.. know?
I'm wondering if this is a high sample rate, killin' convertors and a
Portico. If it is, I'm totally sold man. That sound just can't be pro tools,
somebody tell me it ain't so.
Inquiring minds wanna know, what 'did' those guys record that album with?
AAI am trying to get a subtle stereo vocal sound like the one in this link below.
Can anyone tell me how they think this was recorded and does anyone have
some tips to take a mono vocal and get it to simulate this sound.
It's not real obvious when listening normally but if you use headphones and
the Kelly Stereo tools and pick the preset "Mute Left Center Right" or "Mute
Right Center Left" it will take a channel like Left and put it in both channels
or right and put it in both for a mono effect. Switching this back to default
(stereo) makes the subtle stereo effect very obvious.
I have plenty of reverbs and delays if you have things for me to try. Maybe
it's not possible and I just have to record in stereo. Do you think this
vocal was recorded in stereo or what? Thanks.
Vocal
http://download.yousendit.com/02BE268D26657759
Saxophone
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: More guitar geekdom [message #92569 is a reply to message #92560] |
Fri, 09 November 2007 08:26 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ilto:askme@email.com" target="_blank">askme@email.com> wrote:
>
>Hi Erling,
>
> Interesting you mentioned about the calibration. I will have to look into
>that... and perhaps that is where my problem lies. As I stated, when I go
>directly into the 8-ins from the preamp or DI or whatever, I have no problems
>getting levels. But when I feed through the Behringer mixers, the wet channels
>are not hot enough, although in the monitor of the mixer, it is over powering.
> I know that I may not be explaining it very well... but that is what seems
>to be happening. I have switched the 8-in cards to Pro, instead of Semi-Pro.
> That helped a little, but not enough.
>
>Another way to think of this is... Say my vox is on mixer channel 1 (to
>be recorded) and is fed thru the Direct Out to Channel 1 on the 8-in. And
>say channels 5 thru 16 have guitars, drums, keyboards and backup/harmony
>vox. And this is a rock song, so it isn't soft. I have the Paris main/monitor
>outs fed to the mixer channel 25 and 26 for playback/monitor... If I turn
>up my vox to slightly over power the monitor (and is almost max w/o distortion),
>it is ok in the mix, but not in the recorded levels. So remember, what is
>going out the Direct Out is controlled on mixer channel 1. This has been
>my dilemma for months...
>
>erlilo <erling.lovik@lyse.net> wrote:
>>Hey Ed and Happy New Year to you too!
>>
>>Sorry to hear about your levelproblems with the SL mixer.
>>
>>In the first Paris years I used an Alesis Studio 32 with 16 direct
>>outs, as Martin talked about. Used it for some years but it began to
>>be more and more faulty on some of the channels. So I went the
>>Behringer wagon and get an MX3224X and an UB2442FX-Pro. Have used them
>>for years now with my two Parissystems without problems. One of the
>>systems are mobile and is using the UB mixer to feed 8 direct outs to
>>a Paris 8-ins card. For me, the headroom is good enough for most of my
>>recordings when travelling with it. But the MX3224X is one of the
>>best, if not the best in it's class. The exstra big external power
>>(150 watts/ 7kg) supply is built for extreme uses and have headroom
>>enough to most jobs. 16 direct outs, inserts on each channel, 4 groups
>>outs, in line system etc.
>>http://www.behringer.com/MX3242X/index.cfm?lang=eng
>>
>>After looking at the specifications on the different Behringer mixers,
>>I see that max input level is the same on these kind of mixers. Max
>>output are from +22dBu to +28dBu, where Xenyx, MX and SL have +28, so
>>maybe your problem isn't the mixer at all but the Paris 8-ins card?
>>Are you sure it's calibrated correct to work optimal? On the back of
>>it, you can calibrate it with a little shrewdriver. I know there have
>>been written here about how to do this correct but I can't find the
>>papers here. Maybe some other have them yet, so you can try it out.
>>
>>ErlingThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_01D2_01C84D2E.E1DCFDD0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-88
|
|
|
|
| Re: More guitar geekdom [message #92654 is a reply to message #92475] |
Mon, 12 November 2007 21:07 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
eally works and
>>those
>>>>eq and comps plugins sound great..
>>>>
>>>>Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>>>>>Yeah, I listened to them and really could not hear a preference. I ran
>>>
>>>>>some simple tests with my UAD1 and my hardware UREI 1176LN and could
>not
>>>>
>>>>>hear a preference there either. I must say the Liquid Mix is a bargain
>>>
>>>>>for what all you get.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ted Gerber wrote:
>>>>>> http://www.focusrite.com/liquidmixchallenge/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't know if anyone has tried this yet, but it's interesting. There's
>>>>
>>>>>> also a downloadable phase reverse file for further consideration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I really like the Liquid Mix. To me, it sounds great as a plugin at
>>any
>>>>price
>>>>>> point, but considering the price, I think it's fantastic...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FWIW
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ted
>>>>
>>>
>>
>The liquid mix completely sucks. None of you should even think of buying it.
I'm very upset they are showing its unconscionable level of suck by publishing
these tests, as they might convince people who do not own one to change that
fact. Leave them in the hands of those of us unfortunate to have been swindled
by Focusrite. Please.
TCB
"Ted Gerber" <tedgerber@rogers.com> wrote:
>
>http://www.focusrite.com/liquidmixchallenge/
>
>Don't know if anyone has tried this yet, but it's interesting. There's
>also a downloadable phase reverse file for further consideration.
>
>I really like the Liquid Mix. To me, it sounds great as a plugin at any
price
>point, but considering the price, I think it's fantastic...
>
>FWIW
>
>TedSo which is which?
It's funny that we are on the opposite sides of the political spectrum, and
at the same time we all know we should be voting for Ron Paul
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>The nihilist in me eagerly awaits a Huckabee v. Obama campaign. The man
who
>stands for absolutely nothing but a vague self interest in his own advancement
>vs. the man who concretely and desperately believes in nearly everything
>I despise.
>
>TCB
>
>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>
>>http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080104/D8TUR8980.html
>>
>>Holy Moly! Hillary in 3rd place....
>>
>>
>>DC
>That is pretty f***g funny. So VOTE for RON PAUL!
James McCloskey wrote:
> So which is which?
>
> It's funny that we are on the opposite sides of the political spectrum, and
> at the same time we all know we should be voting for Ron Paul
>
>
> "TCB" <no
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: More guitar geekdom [message #92656 is a reply to message #92654] |
Mon, 12 November 2007 23:14 |
dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
>>> DC
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>I'm very upset they are showing its unconscionable level of suck
I believe that should read "unconscionable level of suckage" ...Pretty damn funny indeed...
DC
Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>That is pretty f***g funny. So VOTE for RON PAUL!
>
>James McCloskey wrote:
>> So which is which?
>>
>> It's funny that we are on the opposite sides of the political spectrum,
and
>> at the same time we all know we should be voting for Ron Paul
>>
>>
>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>> The nihilist in me eagerly awaits a Huckabee v. Obama campaign. The man
>> who
>>> stands for absolutely nothing but a vague self interest in his own advancement
>>> vs. the man who concretely and desperately believes in nearly everything
>>> I despise.
>>>
>>> TCB
>>>
>>> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>>> http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080104/D8TUR8980.html
>>>>
>>>> Holy Moly! Hillary in 3rd place....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> DC
>>Ill never trust fukusrite again after my ordeal with my 215.
"Ted Gerber" <tedgerber@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:477fe80b$1@linux...
>
> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>>I'm very upset they are showing its unconscionable level of suck
>
> I believe that should read "unconscionable level of suckage" ...
>
>"alex plasko" <alex.plasko@snet.net> wrote:
>Ill never trust fukusrite again after my ordeal with my 215.
I've got a Red-8 & an ISA 428, and i love 'em both!
NeilSo....... ;o)
It occurred to me that I should put more effort into resolving this on the
existing MB. Just after some comments if you have any. Currently Paris attempts
to load, the MEC or 442 starts its "boot" and stops right at that point where
the internal sync light and the 48k light come on together. They stay that
way for far too long (compared to "normal") and then the 7/7 error appears.
IIRC that phase is when the MEC is actually attempting to make the audio
link with the EDS card. Presumably this is when EDS comms are going to suddenly
increase from some minor discussions about the boot process to an actual
stream of audio data traffic, so I can see that an IRQ issue might cause
issues at that point.
I'm currently exploring the idea that it's just an IRQ conflict, which seems
possible.
(*) I've noted that my "working" Paris install image is in ACPI mode. I'm
just changing to Standard PC to see if we can't sort some stuff out because...
(*) I noted that the Scherzo driver was being allocated to IRQ 19 by Windows.
It was on its own, but that's not the real IRQ (which was 5, but I've moved
it to 7), but a virtual Windows one. Why Windows made this crazy allocation
I'm not sure. Hopefully Standard PC mode will put it back on 7.
(*) I'm thinking of doing a BIOS reset, or indeed reload, in case the crazy
MB has done something silly here.
In any case, the install image used to work, so this ACPI thingy doesn't
seem the likely cause. A BIOS reset may do it. Or it still could be a MB
hardware fault.
Annoying... ;o)
Cheers,
Kim.I'm still in the Guliani camp. We need a liberal who isn't a total idiot
right about now.
;o)
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:477fdd61$Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: More guitar geekdom [message #92658 is a reply to message #92656] |
Mon, 12 November 2007 22:38 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
>>
>>DC
>Mmm... neither the BIOS Defaults reset or the Standard PC thing seem to
have fixed it. Same deal.
Gosh damnit. ;o)
I'm just going to be really annoyed if I buy a new MB and that's not it.
I've tried a number of things here, many with some confidence of a result,
but nuttin' worked. I've got $4500 I plan to spend on car restorations in
the next 6 weeks. I know a MB is only $70 but I'm runnin' on empty. ;o)
But what I wouldn't do to get Paris up and running. I'm almost considering
loading Reaper to get some stuff done... :oS
Cheers,
Kim.
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>So....... ;o)
>
>It occurred to me that I should put more effort into resolving this on the
>existing MB. Just after some comments if you have any. Currently Paris attempts
>to load, the MEC or 442 starts its "boot" and stops right at that point
where
>the internal sync light and the 48k light come on together. They stay that
>way for far too long (compared to "normal") and then the 7/7 error appears.
>IIRC that phase is when the MEC is actually attempting to make the audio
>link with the EDS card. Presumably this is when EDS comms are going to suddenly
>increase from some minor discussions about the boot process to an actual
>stream of audio data traffic, so I can see that an IRQ issue might cause
>issues at that point.
>
>I'm currently exploring the idea that it's just an IRQ conflict, which seems
>possible.
>
>(*) I've noted that my "working" Paris install image is in ACPI mode. I'm
>just changing to Standard PC to see if we can't sort some stuff out because...
>
>(*) I noted that the Scherzo driver was being allocated to IRQ 19 by Windows.
>It was on its own, but that's not the real IRQ (which was 5, but I've moved
>it to 7), but a virtual Windows one. Why Windows made this crazy allocation
>I'm not sure. Hopefully Standard PC mode will put it back on 7.
>
>(*) I'm thinking of doing a BIOS reset, or indeed reload, in case the crazy
>MB has done something silly here.
>
>In any case, the install image used to work, so this ACPI thingy doesn't
>seem the likely cause. A BIOS reset may do it. Or it still could be a MB
>hardware fault.
>
>Annoying... ;o)
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.Um, isn't that an oxymoron? ;-)
Deej wrote:
> I'm still in the Guliani camp. We need a liberal who isn't a total idiot
> right about now.
>
> ;o)
>
> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:477fdd61$1@linux...
>> The nihilist in me eagerly awaits a Huckabee v. Obama campaign. The man
>> who
>> stands for absolutely nothing but a vague self interest in his own
>> advancement
>> vs. the man who concretely and desperately believes in nearly everything
>> I despise.
>>
>> TCB
>>
>> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>> http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080104/D8TUR8980.html
>>>
>>> Holy Moly! Hillary in 3rd place....
>>>
>>>
>>> DC
>
>Hi Kim,
I tried to respond to another post on this a while back
and got a posting error, I hope this one makes it.
We had some rigs that would get into a 7/7 error mode,
this always means the hardware cannot be seen.
We would use a pencil eraser on the contacts of the EDS
card and clean out the pci slot the best we could with a
De-Oxit type of spray . That usually would do the trick.
In a multi card system - do one card at a time :)
I hope this helps :)
Morgan
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:47800ece$1@linux...
>
>
> Mmm... neither the BIOS Defaults reset or the Standard PC thing seem to
> have fixed it. Same deal.
>
> Gosh damnit. ;o)
>
> I'm just going to be really annoyed if I buy a new MB and that's not it.
> I've tried a number of things here, many with some confidence of a result,
> but nuttin' worked. I've got $4500 I plan to spend on car restorations in
> the next 6 weeks. I know a MB is only $70 but I'm runnin' on empty. ;o)
>
> But what I wouldn't do to get Paris up and running. I'm almost considering
> loading Reaper to get some stuff done... :oS
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.
>
> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>So....... ;o)
>>
>>It occurred to me that I should put more effort into resolving this on the
>>existing MB. Just after some comments if you have any. Currently Paris
>>attempts
>>to load, the MEC or 442 starts its "boot" and stops right at that point
> where
>>the internal sync light and the 48k light come on together. They stay that
>>way for far too long (compared to "normal") and then the 7/7 error
>>appears.
>>IIRC that phase is when the MEC is actually attempting to make the audio
>>link with the EDS card. Presumably this is when EDS comms are going to
>>suddenly
>>increase from some minor discussions about the boot process to an actual
>>stream of audio data traffic, so I can see that an IRQ issue might cause
|
|
|
|
| Re: More guitar geekdom [message #92661 is a reply to message #92658] |
Tue, 13 November 2007 08:48 |
dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
" <morganp@ntplx.net> wrote in message news:47801367@linux...
> Hi Kim,
> I tried to respond to another post on this a while back
> and got a posting error, I hope this one makes it.
>
> We had some rigs that would get into a 7/7 error mode,
> this always means the hardware cannot be seen.
>
> We would use a pencil eraser on the contacts of the EDS
> card and clean out the pci slot the best we could with a
> De-Oxit type of spray . That usually would do the trick.
> In a multi card system - do one card at a time :)
> I hope this helps :)
>
> Morgan
> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:47800ece$1@linux...
>>
>>
>> Mmm... neither the BIOS Defaults reset or the Standard PC thing seem to
>> have fixed it. Same deal.
>>
>> Gosh damnit. ;o)
>>
>> I'm just going to be really annoyed if I buy a new MB and that's not it.
>> I've tried a number of things here, many with some confidence of a
>> result,
>> but nuttin' worked. I've got $4500 I plan to spend on car restorations in
>> the next 6 weeks. I know a MB is only $70 but I'm runnin' on empty. ;o)
>>
>> But what I wouldn't do to get Paris up and running. I'm almost
>> considering
>> loading Reaper to get some stuff done... :oS
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kim.
>>
>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>So....... ;o)
>>>
>>>It occurred to me that I should put more effort into resolving this on
>>>the
>>>existing MB. Just after some comments if you have any. Currently Paris
>>>attempts
>>>to load, the MEC or 442 starts its "boot" and stops right at that point
>> where
>>>the internal sync light and the 48k light come on together. They stay
>>>that
>>>way for far too long (compared to "normal") and then the 7/7 error
>>>appears.
>>>IIRC that phase is when the MEC is actually attempting to make the audio
>>>link with the EDS card. Presumably this is when EDS comms are going to
>>>suddenly
>>>increase from some minor discussions about the boot process to an actual
>>>stream of audio data traffic, so I can see that an IRQ issue might cause
>>>issues at that point.
>>>
>>>I'm currently exploring the idea that it's just an IRQ conflict, which
>>>seems
>>>possible.
>>>
>>>(*) I've noted that my "working" Paris install image is in ACPI mode. I'm
>>>just changing to Standard PC to see if we can't sort some stuff out
>>>because...
>>>
>>>(*) I noted that the Scherzo driver was being allocated to IRQ 19 by
>>>Windows.
>>>It was on its own, but that's not the real IRQ (which was 5, but I've
>>>moved
>>>it to 7), but a virtual Windows one. Why Windows made this crazy
>>>allocation
>>>I'm not sure. Hopefully Standard PC mode will put it back on 7.
>>>
>>>(*) I'm thinking of doing a BIOS reset, or indeed reload, in case the
>>>crazy
>>>MB has done something silly here.
>>>
>>>In any case, the install image used to work, so this ACPI thingy doesn't
>>>seem the likely cause. A BIOS reset may do it. Or it still could be a MB
>>>hardware fault.
>>>
>>>Annoying... ;o)
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Kim.
>>
>
>Morgan,
That seems to be a local issue with your machine.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/297166/en-us
Let me know if you need help with it.
Cheers,
Kim.
"Morgan" <morganp@ntplx.net> wrote:
>Hi Kim,
>
>Here is the error message I was getting:
>
>Outlook Express could not post your message. Subject 'Re: OK, so my Paris
>machine is still cactus... ;o)', Account: 'news.parisnewsgroup.com',
>Server: 'news.parisnewsgroup.com', Protocol: NNTP, Server Response: '441
>Message is too old', Port: 119, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 441, Error
>Number: 0x800CCCA9
>
>
>"Morgan" <morganp@ntplx.net> wrote in message news:47801367@linux...
>> Hi Kim,
>> I tried to respond to another post on this a while back
>> and got a posting error, I hope this one makes it.
>>
>> We had some rigs that would get into a 7/7 error mode,
>> this always means the hardware cannot be seen.
>>
>> We would use a pencil eraser on the contacts of the EDS
>> card and clean out the pci slot the best we could with a
>> De-Oxit type of spray . That usually would do the trick.
>> In a multi card system - do one card at a time :)
>> I hope this helps :)
>>
>> Morgan
>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:47800ece$1@linux...
>>>
>>>
>>> Mmm... neither the BIOS Defaults reset or the Standard PC thing seem
to
>>> have fixed it. Same deal.
>>>
>>> Gosh damnit. ;o)
>>>
>>> I'm just going to be really annoyed if I buy a new MB and that's not
it.
>>> I've tried a number of things here, many with some confidence of a
>>> result,
>>> but nuttin' worked. I've got $4500 I plan to spend on car restorations
in
>>> the next 6 weeks. I know a MB is only $70 but I'm runnin' on empty. ;o)
>>>
>>> But what I wouldn't do to get Paris up and running. I'm almost
>>> considering
>>> loading Reaper to get some stuff done... :oS
>>>
>>&
|
|
|
|
| Re: More guitar geekdom [message #92664 is a reply to message #92661] |
Tue, 13 November 2007 08:33 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
he best we could with a
> >>De-Oxit type of spray . That usually would do the trick.
> >>In a multi card system - do one card at a time :)
> >>I hope this helps :)
> >>
> >>Morgan
> >>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:47800ece$1@linux...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Mmm... neither the BIOS Defaults reset or the Standard PC thing seem
> >to
> >>> have fixed it. Same deal.
> >>>
> >>> Gosh damnit. ;o)
> >>>
> >>> I'm just going to be really annoyed if I buy a new MB and that's not
> it.
> >>> I've tried a number of things here, many with some confidence of a
result,
> >>> but nuttin' worked. I've got $4500 I plan to spend on car restorations
> >in
> >>> the next 6 weeks. I know a MB is only $70 but I'm runnin' on empty.
;o)
> >>>
> >>> But what I wouldn't do to get Paris up and running. I'm almost
considering
> >>> loading Reaper to get some stuff done... :oS
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Kim.
> >>>
> >>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>So....... ;o)
> >>>>
> >>>>It occurred to me that I should put more effort into resolving this on
> >the
> >>>>existing MB. Just after some comments if you have any. Currently Paris
> >
> >>>>attempts
> >>>>to load, the MEC or 442 starts its "boot" and stops right at that
point
> >>> where
> >>>>the internal sync light and the 48k light come on together. They stay
> >that
> >>>>way for far too long (compared to "normal") and then the 7/7 error
> >>>>appears.
> >>>>IIRC that phase is when the MEC is actually attempting to make the
audio
> >>>>link with the EDS card. Presumably this is when EDS comms are going to
> >
> >>>>suddenly
> >>>>increase from some minor discussions about the boot process to an
actual
> >>>>stream of audio data traffic, so I can see that an IRQ issue might
cause
> >>>>issues at that point.
> >>>>
> >>>>I'm currently exploring the idea that it's just an IRQ conflict, which
> >
> >>>>seems
> >>>>possible.
> >>>>
> >>>>(*) I've noted that my "working" Paris install image is in ACPI mode.
> >I'm
> >>>>just changing to Standard PC to see if we can't sort some stuff out
> >>>>because...
> >>>>
> >>>>(*) I noted that the Scherzo driver was being allocated to IRQ 19 by
>
> >>>>Windows.
> >>>>It was on its own, but that's not the real IRQ (which was 5, but I've
> >
> >>>>moved
> >>>>it to 7), but a virtual Windows one. Why Windows made this crazy
> >>>>allocation
> >>>>I'm not sure. Hopefully Standard PC mode will put it back on 7.
> >>>>
> >>>>(*) I'm thinking of doing a BIOS reset, or indeed reload, in case the
> >
> >>>>crazy
> >>>>MB has done something silly here.
> >>>>
> >>>>In any case, the install image used to work, so this ACPI thingy
doesn't
> >>>>seem the likely cause. A BIOS reset may do it. Or it still could be a
> >MB
> >>>>hardware fault.
> >>>>
> >>>>Annoying... ;o)
> >>>>
> >>>>Cheers,
> >>>>Kim.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>Thad, why do you say that the Liquid Mix suck? I thought you loved it? What
has changed..
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>The liquid mix completely sucks. None of you should even think of buying
it.
>I'm very upset they are showing its unconscionable level of suck by publishing
>these tests, as they might convince people who do not own one to change
that
>fact. Leave them in the hands of those of us unfortunate to have been swindled
>by Focusrite. Please.
>
>TCB
>
>"Ted Gerber" <tedgerber@rogers.com> wrote:
>>
>>http://www.focusrite.com/liquidmixchallenge/
>>
>>Don't know if anyone has tried this yet, but it's interesting. There's
>>also a downloadable phase reverse file for further consideration.
>>
>>I really like the Liquid Mix. To me, it sounds great as a plugin at any
>price
>>point, but considering the price, I think it's fantastic...
>>
>>FWIW
>>
>>Ted
>yeah, that's like a compassionate conservative.
;o)
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:14:18 -0500, Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com>
wrote:
>Um, isn't that an oxymoron? ;-)
>
>Deej wrote:
>> I'm still in the Guliani camp. We need a liberal who isn't a total idiot
>> right about now.
>>
>> ;o)
>>
>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:477fdd61$1@linux...
>>> The nihilist in me eagerly awaits a Huckabee v. Obama campaign. The man
>>> who
>>> stands for absolutely nothing but a vague self interest in his own
>>> advancement
>>> vs. the man who concretely and desperately believes in nearly everything
>>> I despise.
>>>
>>> TCB
>>>
>>> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>>> http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080104/D8TUR8980.html
>>>>
>>>> Holy Moly! Hillary in 3rd place....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> DC
>>
>>I will unless my vote becomes meaningless and it needs to be used to screw
hillary the liar.I believe mischievous Thad, not on-the-level Thad, wrote that...
"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Thad, why do you say that the Liquid Mix suck? I thought you loved it? What
>has changed..
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>>The liquid mix completely sucks. None of you should even think of buying
>it.
>>I'm very upset they are showing its unconscionable level of suck by publishing
>>these tests, as they might convince people who do not own one to change
>that
>>fact. Leave them in the hands of those of us unfortunate to have been swindled
>>by Focusrite. Please.
|
|
|
|
| Re: More guitar geekdom [message #92668 is a reply to message #92664] |
Tue, 13 November 2007 12:20 |
dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Modern computers
can assign 24 or more "real" unshared IRQs that map directly to the slot/letter
combination of the card.
Eben if they are shared, it shouldn't be a problem. Sharing support is required
in all PCI drivers, and it is literally 2 or three lines of code. It would
be very unusual if a card's driver didn't support sharing these days.
Have you tried deleting any default project that you have? I apologize if
that was suggested/tried before.
Good luck!!
Mike
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>So....... ;o)
>
>It occurred to me that I should put more effort into resolving this on the
>existing MB. Just after some comments if you have any. Currently Paris attempts
>to load, the MEC or 442 starts its "boot" and stops right at that point
where
>the internal sync light and the 48k light come on together. They stay that
>way for far too long (compared to "normal") and then the 7/7 error appears.
>IIRC that phase is when the MEC is actually attempting to make the audio
>link with the EDS card. Presumably this is when EDS comms are going to suddenly
>increase from some minor discussions about the boot process to an actual
>stream of audio data traffic, so I can see that an IRQ issue might cause
>issues at that point.
>
>I'm currently exploring the idea that it's just an IRQ conflict, which seems
>possible.
>
>(*) I've noted that my "working" Paris install image is in ACPI mode. I'm
>just changing to Standard PC to see if we can't sort some stuff out because...
>
>(*) I noted that the Scherzo driver was being allocated to IRQ 19 by Windows.
>It was on its own, but that's not the real IRQ (which was 5, but I've moved
>it to 7), but a virtual Windows one. Why Windows made this crazy allocation
>I'm not sure. Hopefully Standard PC mode will put it back on 7.
>
>(*) I'm thinking of doing a BIOS reset, or indeed reload, in case the crazy
>MB has done something silly here.
>
>In any case, the install image used to work, so this ACPI thingy doesn't
>seem the likely cause. A BIOS reset may do it. Or it still could be a MB
>hardware fault.
>
>Annoying... ;o)
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/01042008/watch2.html
This is a very thoughtful interview. If you like Paul's message, pass it
on to others who might be excited to know there is an alternative to big
bus- I'm sorry. I meant big government running our lives.Where is this on-the-level Thad? I'd like to meet that fellow . . .
TCB
"Ted Gerber" <tedgerber@rogers.com> wrote:
>
>I believe mischievous Thad, not on-the-level Thad, wrote that...
>
>
>"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Thad, why do you say that the Liquid Mix suck? I thought you loved it?
What
>>has changed..
>>
>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>The liquid mix completely sucks. None of you should even think of buying
>>it.
>>>I'm very upset they are showing its unconscionable level of suck by publishing
>>>these tests, as they might convince people who do not own one to change
>>that
>>>fact. Leave them in the hands of those of us unfortunate to have been
swindled
>>>by Focusrite. Please.
>>>
>>>TCB
>>>
>>>"Ted Gerber" <tedgerber@rogers.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.focusrite.com/liquidmixchallenge/
>>>>
>>>>Don't know if anyone has tried this yet, but it's interesting. There's
>>
>>>>also a downloadable phase reverse file for further consideration.
>>>>
>>>>I really like the Liquid Mix. To me, it sounds great as a plugin at any
>>>price
>>>>point, but considering the price, I think it's fantastic...
>>>>
>>>>FWIW
>>>>
>>>>Ted
>>>
>>
>I wouldn't be especially terrified of a Guliani administration, though I've
always wondered if anyone dirty enough to become (and stay) mayor of NYC
could be clean enough to win a presidential campaign. I'd certainly prefer
it to any of the Dems or Reps.
TCB
"Deej" <noway@jose.org> wrote:
>I'm still in the Guliani camp. We need a liberal who isn't a total idiot
>right about now.
>
>;o)
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:477fdd61$1@linux...
>>
>> The nihilist in me eagerly awaits a Huckabee v. Obama campaign. The man
>> who
>> stands for absolutely nothing but a vague self interest in his own
>> advancement
>> vs. the man who concretely and desperately believes in nearly everything
>> I despise.
>>
>> TCB
>>
>> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080104/D8TUR8980.html
>>>
>>>Holy Moly! Hillary in 3rd place....
>>>
>>>
>>>DC
>>
>
>Ug, Should I have any trepidations on ugrading form 4.6 to 4.9?"Cujo" <Chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote:
>
>
>Ug, Should I have any trepidations on ugrading form 4.6 to 4.9?
You should have trepidations about being the first one to do
it lol!
NeilThanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!!
Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!!
Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!!
Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!!
Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!!
Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!!Guys,
After thinking this through a bit more, I realized that my carefully
conceived plans took everything into account but Crash himself. He doesn't
really take well to being handled by strangers and it pretty much subject to
copping a very uncooperative attitude with stuff like this when put in an
unfamiliar environment. Stressing him to this degree on top of a long and
uncomfortable vehicle trip and then putting him in a situation wherein some
stranger is poking and prodding him will just not work and what will happen
is that I'll be in Denver, on the cusp of a weekend, needing to hire some
vet who is a stranger to come over to this facility to give him mild
sedation. We have a local vet who does housecalls and who Crash likes come
over here and help us do the whole procedure here. Once the brace is
fabricated, if it has problems, then I can bring him to Denver for a
retooling session without introducing him to such an ordeal. These big dogs
are surprisingly fragile when it comes to stress and all sorts of negatives
can result.
Maybe Aaron and I can plan a Denver, part 2 next spring, or we could all get
together here or in some other cool place like Taos or Sante Fe and have
some fun.
Just wanted to let you guys. I hope this didn't hose your plans for nrext
weekend. I know some of you cleared the decks for us so I wanted to let you
know ASAP.
DeejWow, John! I guess I made your day.
John wrote:
> Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!!
> Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!!
> Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!!
> Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!!
> Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!!
> Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!! Thanks !!!!!!
>"Deej" <noway@jose.org> wrote:
>Maybe Aaron and I can plan a Denver, part 2 next spring, or we could all
get
>together here or in some other cool place like Taos or Sante Fe and hav
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun May 10 15:12:11 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04361 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
