| Nebula3 [message #87418] |
Sat, 30 June 2007 20:08  |
gene lennon
Messages: 565 Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
=3D3D20<BR> > =
PUBLIC=20
"-//W3C//DTD HTML =
=3D<BR> > &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Nebula3 [message #87805 is a reply to message #87804] |
Sun, 08 July 2007 17:07   |
Neil
Messages: 1645 Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ngs "must" be written, price description...
>>Thank you again for considering in helping out !!!
>>Regards,
>>Dimitrios
>Oh oh, I was thinking of uping to that myself for the helios EQ.
Anyother issues?
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.r.com> wrote:
>
>In case I wasn't clear...up till UAD 4.7 I've been able to render with
no
>problems, both mono (normal) renders, and stereo renders (within the destructive
>editor) 4.7 seems to have broken this for Paris. Anyone else notice this?
>Rod
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hey, has anyone tried rendering any UAD plugs since version4.7 came out?
>I
>>tried to render the fairchild today (been using them, Neve channel strip
>>etc, with no problem, but never had to render)and got a C++ visiual runtime
>>error. It happens right at the end of the render.
>>After that happened I rebooted, and tried again...same thing happened.
Then
>>Paris got totally wonky. I re-ghosted back to a drive image with UAD 4.6
>>and all was well. I ran several tests and it was rock solid. I then uninstalled
>>4.6 and installed 4.7 again, opened up a fresh ppj, added audio file, put
>>a UAD plug on it and it played fine, then I tried to render and I got the
>>exact same runtime C++ error. Any one else seen this???
>>I already bought the Neve strip and the LA3A, maybe I can de-authorize
them
>>if this new finally finally breaks Paris.
>>Rod
|
|
|
|
| Re: Nebula3 [message #87807 is a reply to message #87805] |
Sun, 08 July 2007 18:06   |
gene lennon
Messages: 565 Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
>>I
>>>tried to render the fairchild today (been using them, Neve channel strip
>>>etc, with no problem, but never had to render)and got a C++ visiual runtime
>>>error. It happens right at the end of the render.
>>>After that happened I rebooted, and tried again...same thing happened.
>Then
>>>Paris got totally wonky. I re-ghosted back to a drive image with UAD 4.6
>>>and all was well. I ran several tests and it was rock solid. I then uninstalled
>>>4.6 and installed 4.7 again, opened up a fresh ppj, added audio file,
put
>>>a UAD plug on it and it played fine, then I tried to render and I got
the
>>>exact same runtime C++ error. Any one else seen this???
>>>I already bought the Neve strip and the LA3A, maybe I can de-authorize
>them
>>>if this new finally finally breaks Paris.
>>>Rod
>>
>Bill, do you know if Weckl is still using the yamaha digital (01r last I'd
heard) mixer to submix his kit on his solo gigs?
AA
"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:46c1a339@linux...
>I put together a rig for live recording of Chick Corea. We used a new Mac
>laptop (2005) and RME boxes on PCMCIA (don't recall the model) out via ADAT
>to AD16X plus a MOTU 8 in box for the less important stuff. Firewire was
>not possible. I kind of think 24 tracks of 88.2 won't fly either, but if
>you cut the number of tracks, it might. We had Dave Weckl's kit to handle
>so we needed max inputs.
>
> We thought about bringing pres but for ease of shipping and simplicity we
> took it off the board inserts by plugging in part way. I made the whole
> rig: rack, cables and all, fit in a hard Samsonite, if I do say so myself.
> Worked like a dream.
>
> Neil wrote:
>> I might have the opportunity to do a series of live recordings
>> here coming up the near future, and if I do end up doing these,
>> I would want to do them in CubaseSX for ease of importation to
>> the "home base" for mixdown. They'll all be multitracked to the
>> best of my ability to mic them (or to take direct outs or
>> submixes off the board, if possible... I'm guessing "not
>> possible" for the most part) in the live environment, so I'm
>> trying to figure out the following, and any input would be
>> appreciated. These questions are laptop/notebook-specific, as I
>> really don't want to get into ripping out my main DAW PC &
>> porting it around for these ventures, and while - like most of
>> you, I suspect - I've r
|
|
|
|
|
|