|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Getting C16 to work [message #88716 is a reply to message #88715] |
Sat, 04 August 2007 08:56   |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
my dash... and a wire going
>straight into the CD changer input on my car stereo....
>
>its been a lot of fun to see what comes up next on shuffle...
>
>
>
>
>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>
>>Yeah, 400 is a bunch O' work...
>>
>>DC
>>
>>"chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Boy am I glad I ripped my entire CD collection to uncompressed .wav files
>>>instead of some other format.
>>>
>>>I can't imagine ripping 400 CDs again!
>>>
>>>Chuck
>>>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>But seriously, do oyu guys realize that we now have a player
>>>>(iPod Classic 160G) that can hold more than 200 CD's of
>>>>totally uncompressed audio?
>>>>
>>>>There is now no reason ro not get one. None at all.
>>>>
>>>>Also, there is really no reason for CD's anymore, other than
>>>>the fact that to get uncompressed audio down most of the
>>>>isp's we use would simply take too long. That will change too.
>>>>
>>>>Amazing.
>>>>
>>>>DC
>>>>
>>>
>>
>"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:4700013a@linux...
>I recently recorded and mixed the Lennon & McCartney gem, In My Life. I
>would appreciate mix input from my amigos. Anything too loud, too soft, EQ,
>F/X, etc?
>
> Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Getting C16 to work [message #88723 is a reply to message #88716] |
Sat, 04 August 2007 11:26 |
Ed
Messages: 199
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> (rough subjective estimate of course), depending on what you rate as
> subjectively the most critical characteristics - to me, it's top end as
> that's where you really start to discern the most minute differences in
> clarity and imaging. My .02 at least.
>
> I'm quite pleased with my RME converters. I think they stand up well
> esp. for the price.
>
> Dedric
>
>> point. I've heard Lynx and Apogee converters and I preferred Mytek to
>> those. Since I'm comparing the RME to Mytek here and thinking that
>> they stand up to them, I'd say that these boxes are a hell of a deal
>> for the price.
>>
>> OK...'nuff said.
>>
>> Deej
>>
>>
>Neil, you busted me on a couple things. I actually originally had fewer
kicks, exactly as you suggested, but I caved thinking that I needed more
to suit the "modern" sound. Thanks for straightening me out on that.
I did boost some lows with a UAD Pultec. I used their female vocal
setting, duh. Man, am I lazy. I thought it had too much bottom too, then
I forgot about it. It does happen to be a completely different signal
chain, but I don't think that was the cause. AT 4050 > Yamaha I88x.
The cowbell is actually at plus 20 dB, but I have a duplicate track out
of phase, so you can't actually hear them, but the "vibe" is there,
which will for sure make it a hit, 'cause that's how I put my pants on,
dude.
Neil wrote:
> I like the mix a lot! Things I would tweak:
>
> 1.) The kick - it's got a little too much impact for this type
> of groove - I would soften it up a bit, roll off a bit of 3k-
> 4k, somewhere in there. ALSO, there are too many of 'em... the
> double-hit every measure is too much. Can you change it up a
> bit without too much hassle (re-syncing MIDI, etc), maybe mute
> some of the hits via automation? I think if you did something
> like leave it as is for a few measures, then once the vocals
> start cut it back to hit/hit-hit/hit/hit-hit, then a cycle of
> hit/pause/hit-hit/pause, then repeat.
>
> 2.) There's something a little bit "cloudy" in the lower mids of
> Vikki's voice on this one... I'm not sure if it's a little too
> much of something in there, or a little too little of something
> somewhere else/a bit higher. I would try cutting in the
> 500-ish range and then maybe adding a bit of "air" in the
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Getting C16 to work [message #88849 is a reply to message #88834] |
Thu, 09 August 2007 07:49 |
Rich[3]
Messages: 132
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ry mix on the compressors ??
>That should have the 2 samples latency as to be in phase .
>You know all ensoniq plugins introduce 2 samples latency !
>That would make a very very important addition !
>Thus you could add (in phase) some uncompressed signal along a squashed
one
>!!
>I would love that !!
>
>Also it would be handy a simple latency adder !
>That is if you wanna put a couple of compressors on kick and snare and keep
>the drumtracks in phase you could put the latency adder for the 2 samples
>each introduces and not charge the Eds cpu !
>
>Keep up the great work !
>Regards,
>Dimitrios
>
>
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote:
>>
>>Hi Dimitrios,
>>
>>Thanks for you kind words!
>>
>>It's not that we had sample rate conversion on the fly, but the ma
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
