|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT - Laptop Suggestions [message #94981 is a reply to message #94922] |
Mon, 21 January 2008 13:47  |
D-unit
Messages: 69
Registered: February 2006
|
Member |
|
|
e guitar...
>
> Thanks in advance for any tips.
> Dan
>It's still going to sound like a split coil humbucker on a carved top solid
maple/mahogany body with a shorter scale set neck, which is closer to a strat
but it's still not a strat. I like technology as much as the next guy but
either you use it like Leo made it or you don't get the sound. You can get
closer, but if you put a big fat 'bucker on the neck pickup of your Tele
will it sound like a Les Paul?
It might be good enough for government work but there's a lot more to making
a strat sound like a strat than the pickup wiring.
TCB
Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>I'm very interested. Do you know if the PRS pickups have any unique
>characteristics that make this system work?
>
>Gantt Kushner wrote:
>> I have a PRS for which I came up with a trick circuit for pickups with
all
>> four conductors available - mine are made by Tom Holmes. I have a regular
>> 3 position PU selector and a 4 pole/double throw mini switch. W/ the
mini
>> switch in one position I have a normal 2 humbucking guitar. Flip the
switch
>> and the treble position becomes the outside coils in series, the bass
position
>> becomes the inside coils in parallel (PRS calls this "Parallel Strat")
and
>> the middle position combines those two hybrid pickups. The series outside
>> sound is my all time favorite - it has the power of a humbucking PU w/
the
>> bright, round sound of both pickups. If you're interested I'll find my
scan
>> of the schematic and post it. I'd probably suggest having an experienced
>> guitar tech do the wiring because it can be a pain getting the wires straight
>> so it works as I described.
>>
>> Gantt
>>
>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You could wire 'em like a PRS for a useful range of tones that would
>>> cover your gigs.
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Jamie
>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>try this too
http://ensoniq.ca/index_files/Installing%20plugins%20and%20m ore.doc
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:akcqu354ddf3h5h1ejh8hjp5kdmdplthck@4ax.com...
>i finally took an opportunity to try out the plugs that i've d-loaded
> and these do not work on my set up
> amp 1.2
> big reverb
> Pcompressor
> the Ducker
> multiband comp
> sorry it took me so long to get to them. it says there's an error
> with the fx library.I think they (Steinberg/Yamaha) new that the only wayto achieve real Zero
Latency was to use "Dedicated" Hardware.
I see no problem with that. Now, those super duper CPUs can take on the task
of providing mega watt power to all those cool native plugins..
It's funny, but Paris (Ensoniq/ID) had this vision way back in 1997!! Yikes..
Best of all worlds.
"scott h" <fresnelmusic@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>so.. they are going down the road that all of us were gnashing our teeth
for...
>oooh... 10 years ago... best of both worlds... native portability... with
>hardware power back at the home base....
>
>if only, if only....
>
>"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Well, this is esentialy dedicated "hardware" for a native DAW. That's not
>>so-native if you use these units..Hummmm??
>>
>>Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>>>http://www.sonicstate.com/news/shownews.cfm?newsid=6286
>>>
>>>Apparently what they have done is duplicated some of the systems in
>>>Cubase within the hardwa
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
