|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Today is Nappy Day [message #87606 is a reply to message #87605] |
Thu, 05 July 2007 07:24   |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
d annoying people as some of the
>>>>>>>>> politics
>>>>>>>>> stuff does. I actually like the political stuff too, but I know
> quite
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> number
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> of people get irritated by it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not going to go to an Apple group for Apple updates but like
> to
>>> know
>>>>>>>>> what's going on in Apple land so...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Kim.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's 100 degrees in the shade here. I think I'm delirious.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Man what's up with you today? People post about all kinds of
> stuff
>>>>>> here.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>>>>>>> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I just want to know why he's spamming a Paris group with Apple
>>> crap.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> what apple forums are for.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>A friend of mine (and Deej's) out of Nashville recently released a CD on which
10 of 11 songs were mixed 100% ITB with PTHD...the other one was mixed using
schweet outboard and a killer console...
I can't tell which is which, and he ain't talking...
Why bring this up? I don't know...just lonely I guess...that, and when the
mix engineer is 100% on game, the differences all become moot...add that
to what's already been said about hypercompressing really crappy music to
formats crummier than cassettes, what difference does any of it make?
Jaded but still looking for an alibi,
Kwell without going too deep into the debate, but here are my findings:
any daw includung paris improves with a ny mixer (digital or analog)..
end of story
"Steve Helm" <shelm@radford.edu> wrote:
>
>Anyone want to revive the old summing debate?
>Check out Digi's In the box vs SSL comparison.
>
> http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?navid=49&langid=100& amp;itemid=25669A question about PT, (off topic I know), but I have (sometimes use), PT M
powered.
I always thought my comp felt sluggish, or at least the screed redraws
looked sluggish, and that was on an Intel Core2 Duo 6600 with 2 gig of
ram..shouldn't be the case right?
Everything else seemed quite snappy...put not PT.
Well.... now I just built a Quad Core (Intel Q6600) with 4 gb ram and an
N-Videia 8500 card, (that was on the comp previously), and PT feels just the
same....
Is it PT?
The meters seem really sluggish although I can get really low latency whist
recording with no problems. the graphics are just crappy.
Any ideas guys?
Martin Harrington
www.lendanear-sound.com
0414 913 247You guys should take the challenge. I got 57% correct. It *seemed* to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Today is Nappy Day [message #87619 is a reply to message #87618] |
Thu, 05 July 2007 13:35 |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hey Lamont - my rig only goes online to grab updates to audio apps,
>>>>>>>registration/response codes (which is getting annoying), but never
>>
>> a
>>
>>>>problem
>>>>
>>>>>>>with that. But even on the net PC that's online all day with email,
>>>>
>>>>Skype,
>>>>
>>>>>>>etc, never had a virus, spyware, or malware. If OSX would only stop
>>>>
>>>>spam
>>>>
>>>>>>>mail from being sent (not filtered, but shot down at the source via
>>
>> a
>>
>>>>large
>>>>
>>>>>>>burst of electricity designed to fry any and all spammer computers,
>>
>> Apple
>>
>>>>>>>would really have something.... ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Let
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Today is Nappy Day [message #87651 is a reply to message #87644] |
Fri, 06 July 2007 00:03 |
erlilo
Messages: 405
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
=
do=20
use. For me, whichever OS<BR>> runs better for what I do would =
is my=20
preference, regardless of who makes it<BR>> - but without a =
standalone=20
version of OSX it's hard to make that call since<BR>> I can't pair it =
with=20
the hardware I prefer. And without 3rd party support<BR>> for =
Linux,=20
that's out as well. If I ran Logic (which is a great app), =
no<BR>>=20
doubt, I'd have a Mac... or 2 or 3.<BR>> <BR>> I'm also not =
knocking iLife=20
- it is a nice suite of handy apps that MS<BR>> doesn't have a =
comparable=20
product (the functions are there in Media Player,<BR>> Movie Maker, =
etc, but=20
iLife's apps are more user friendly). I also wouldn't<BR>> mind =
iWork=20
over Office - I've seriously considered a MacBook for that =
reason<BR>> (the=20
"upgrade" to Office 2007 to run on Vista (I have Office 2003 or<BR>>=20
something like that) is $275 - not exactly a bargain for more than I=20
would<BR>> ever use. I like that iWork supports MS Word Docs, =
Excel,=20
and Powerpoint<BR>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Today is Nappy Day [message #87686 is a reply to message #87651] |
Fri, 06 July 2007 09:22 |
Gary Flanigan
Messages: 181
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>what apple forums are for.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>One other thing, depending on the installer disc, you can do a custom install.
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Dave(EK Sound)" <audioguy_editout_@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>Not anti Mac at all... nothing wrong with the stuff for
>>people that want to use it... but why should people have to
>>have it loaded on their machine if they don't? Same goes
>>for Windows... I don't want messenger, Exploder, and the
>>rest of the bloat. I think people should be able to CHOOSE
>>"at install time" on either platform what they do or do not
>>want on their system.
>>
>>I want these machines for work, not play. And as I
>>mentioned, we use MacPro and well as XP machines at the
>>office for audio.
>>
>>David.
>
>Well, if your a Mac user, then you know that you can remove any application
>you don't want. As a Mac user you would also know that those applications
>on your drive are not much of a performance hit, if at all. You might want
>to do a search on how to turn dash board off though, because it launches
>at start up. Also remove
|
|
|
|
| Re: Today is Nappy Day [message #87696 is a reply to message #87669] |
Fri, 06 July 2007 12:15 |
Rich[3]
Messages: 132
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
know), but I have (sometimes use), PT
M
>powered.
>I always thought my comp felt sluggish, or at least the screed redraws
>looked sluggish, and that was on an Intel Core2 Duo 6600 with 2 gig of
>ram..shouldn't be the case right?
>Everything else seemed quite snappy...put not PT.
>Well.... now I just built a Quad Core (Intel Q6600) with 4 gb ram and an
>N-Vi
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
