Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Mike Audet can you do that ?????
|
|
| Re: Mike Audet can you do that ????? [message #96454 is a reply to message #96425] |
Sat, 01 March 2008 18:02   |
![mike audet[1] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "mike audet[1] is currently offline")
mike audet[1]
Messages: 129
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ptation to post back your witty retort to whoever you thought was out
>> of line. Let it sit for a bit.
>>
>> What's more important to me right now than anything is getting some
>> positive
>> input into the group, and I think we have heard enough of the arguments
>> for
>> a bit. So I'll ask you all, for a couple of days at least:
>>
>> (*) If it's an argument, just let it go. I don't care if your comment
is
>> arguably warranted. What's warranted more is some peace and harmony in
the
>> group.
>>
>> (*) Think of something On Topic to post. New music software or plug info.
>> An instrument you're planning to buy. Whatever.
>>
>> Later today I hope to clear off some of these messy threads and we can
>> pretend
>> it never happened for a bit. Let's see the group become a little more
of
>> a community again. If there's one thing everybody agrees on it's that
>> there's
>> too much discord, so let's simply avoid it for a bit.
>>
>> I'll rename the groups, and we'll look at some kind of guide to group
>> behaviour
>> perhaps.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kim.
>
>Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>Hi Derek,
>
>Good to hear you're doing well. Still in the bunker?
>
>I saw some publicity photos of Nena and her band recently. I was
>wondering if you were with her still?
hey bill,
yes im still working with her, quite a lot actually, produced
the last album, right now we make a whole round of rearrangements
for the live shows etc...she plays live very often and
has a very stable basis there - good thing to have in these
troubled times where people dont buy records. thank god
you cant download a livee concert ;-)setting aside the "its not going to happen" stuff?
having true multi i/o asio drivers for the MECs would be
very cool. i have a lot of paris i/o flying around here,
always loved the way they sounded in all their ensoniq-ness
and would love to integrated that with my current setup.
derek
Kerry Galloway <kg@kerrygalloway.com> wrote:
>Set aside the "it's not going to happen" stuff for now. For the sake of
this
>hypothetical, let's just assume there were a chance.
>
>For our hypothetical, let's further assume the following:
>
>1) WinXP for sure. Support for earlier OS' unknown. No Mac OS9 support.
>
>2) All I/Os accessible - including all MEC expansion cards. Let's assume
the
>goal would be that the driver could utilize all the same I/Os the PARIS
app
>would.
>
>3) 16 and 24 bit; 44.1k and 48k. Unimpaired sound quality.
>
>4) Stable and tested with all major platforms - REAPER, Ableton, Cubase,
>Nuendo etc - with full I/O functionality
>
>5) Highly skilled work
>
>>>>
>
>So with those assumptions in place - rate the importance to you of ASIO
>drivers being created for PARIS - real ASIO drivers - on a scale of zero
to
>five, with zero being "not at all" and five being "yippee! The farm is
>saved! My life is complete and I can finally die happy!".
>
>This is undoubtedly obvious to state, but hey, I'm a bass player - we make
>our livings stating completely obvious things. So with that in mind - this
>question is obviously directed to *current PARIS users* - after all, if
a
>hundred people who sold their rigs answer "zero" it's not meaningful
>infor
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mike Audet can you do that ????? [message #96462 is a reply to message #96454] |
Sun, 02 March 2008 02:48 |
Dimitrios
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
hythm. Or run both at the
> same time for fat, sustaining distortion w/ a nice clear, articulated note
> underneath. Or switch the amp around to have a little crunch on the neck/mid
> PU and bright, clean Tele twang on the bridge PU. You could start the experiment
> by wiring a guitar in stereo and using two amps.
>
> Hmmm. I might have found a use for some of my down-time this week!
>
> GanttI forgot to ask. hehe I was never into details. hahaSarah, that's the missing ingredient: a sense of humor! Laugh at
ourselves and we will be a whole lot happier. Truly, nothing is more
liberally larded with bitter sweet irony than human behavior.
Sarah wrote:
> I like your thinking on this. I do want to say something (perhaps in my own
> defense?), which is just that some of us might not be as angry or combative
> as we sound. Like when DJ and/or Don and I get into something . . . I know
> it gets noisy and sarcastic at times, but I think we just like to "rassle,"
> test out our own points of view. I never hang on to it or take things
> personally. I just like the unfiltered banter. :)
>
> S
>
> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:481fb97e$1@linux...
>>
>> OK, are you relaxed? ;o)
>>
>> Here's the plan.
>>
>> We're all going to chill for a bit. I've had a few emails from a few
>> people,
>> and I think we all acknowledge that the group has been lacking decorum as
>> well as On Topic posts.
>>
>> So unfortunately I'm gonna get all moderator on you all. Later today the
>> groups will be renamed as discussed to make it clearer where you can and
>> cannot post certain things. This will hopefully clear any off topic
>> debates
>> and tension from the main group at least. Furthermore, I plan to start
>> deleting
>> or moving posts or threads for a short time as appropriate, and it's not
>> impossible that I will look, at least temporarily, at asking or forcing
>> certain
>> people to refrain.
>>
>> In a recent email with Chuck he commented to me that he never wanted to be
>> a moderator. I'm much the same, and I think the spirit of the group has
>> always
>> been that we sort out our own issues amongst ourselves without a
>> moderator.
>> I think this has worked well in creating a group of people who are open
>> and
>> honest with each other, but recently we've struggled with a lot of this
>> stuff.
>>
>> I'm also half pondering creation of a Paris NG usage policy of some sort,
>> which gives a guide to decorum and approach which is expected. That's just
>> food for thought at the moment.
>>
>> Right now however I just want to ask that everybody chill out. Resist that
>> temptation to post back your witty retort to whoever you thought was out
>> of line. Let it sit for a bit.
>>
>> What's more important to me right now than anything is getting some
>> positive
>> input into the group, and I think we have heard enough of the arguments
>> for
>> a bit. So I'll ask you all, for a couple of days at least:
>>
>> (*) If it's an argument, just let it go. I don't care if your comment is
>> arguably warranted. What's warranted more is some peace and harmony in the
>> group.
>>
>> (*) Think of something On Topic to post. New music software or plug info.
>> An instrument you're planning to buy. Whatever.
>>
>> Later today I hope to clear off some of these messy threads and we can
>> pretend
>> it never happened for a bit. Let's see the group become a little more of
>> a community again. If there's one thing everybody agrees on it's that
>> there's
>> too much discord, so let's simply avoid it for a bit.
>>
>> I'll rename the groups, and we'll look at some kind of guide to group
>> behaviour
>> perhaps.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kim.
>
>You said "lard." (giggle)
S
"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:4821c1ff$1@linux...
> Sarah, that's the missing ingredient: a sense of humor! Laugh at ourselves
> and we will be a whole lot happier. Truly, nothing is more liberally
> larded with bitter sweet irony than human behavior.
>
> Sarah wrote:
>> I like your thinking on this. I do want to say something (perhaps in my
>> own defense?), which is just that some of us might not be as angry or
>> combative as we sound. Like when DJ and/or Don and I get into something
>> . . . I know it gets noisy and sarcastic at times, but I think we just
>> like to "rassle," test ou
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mike Audet can you do that ????? [message #96463 is a reply to message #96454] |
Sun, 02 March 2008 02:53 |
Dimitrios
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t our own points of view. I never hang on to it
>> or take things personally. I just like the unfiltered banter. :)
>>
>> S
>>
>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:481fb97e$1@linux...
>>>
>>> OK, are you relaxed? ;o)
>>>
>>> Here's the plan.
>>>
>>> We're all going to chill for a bit. I've had a few emails from a few
>>> people,
>>> and I think we all acknowledge that the group has been lacking decorum
>>> as
>>> well as On Topic posts.
>>>
>>> So unfortunately I'm gonna get all moderator on you all. Later today the
>>> groups will be renamed as discussed to make it clearer where you can and
>>> cannot post certain things. This will hopefully clear any off topic
>>> debates
>>> and tension from the main group at least. Furthermore, I plan to start
>>> deleting
>>> or moving posts or threads for a short time as appropriate, and it's not
>>> impossible that I will look, at least temporarily, at asking or forcing
>>> certain
>>> people to refrain.
>>>
>>> In a recent email with Chuck he commented to me that he never wanted to
>>> be
>>> a moderator. I'm much the same, and I think the spirit of the group has
>>> always
>>> been that we sort out our own issues amongst ourselves without a
>>> moderator.
>>> I think this has worked well in creating a group of people who are open
>>> and
>>> honest with each other, but recently we've struggled with a lot of this
>>> stuff.
>>>
>>> I'm also half pondering creation of a Paris NG usage policy of some
>>> sort,
>>> which gives a guide to decorum and approach which is expected. That's
>>> just
>>> food for thought at the moment.
>>>
>>> Right now however I just want to ask that everybody chill out. Resist
>>> that
>>> temptation to post back your witty retort to whoever you thought was out
>>> of line. Let it sit for a bit.
>>>
>>> What's more important to me right now than anything is getting some
>>> positive
>>> input into the group, and I think we have heard enough of the arguments
>>> for
>>> a bit. So I'll ask you all, for a couple of days at least:
>>>
>>> (*) If it's an argument, just let it go. I don't care if your comment is
>>> arguably warranted. What's warranted more is some peace and harmony in
>>> the
>>> group.
>>>
>>> (*) Think of something On Topic to post. New music software or plug
>>> info.
>>> An instrument you're planning to buy. Whatever.
>>>
>>> Later today I hope to clear off some of these messy threads and we can
>>> pretend
>>> it never happened for a bit. Let's see the group become a little more of
>>> a community again. If there's one thing everybody agrees on it's that
>>> there's
>>> too much discord, so let's simply avoid it for a bit.
>>>
>>> I'll rename the groups, and we'll look at some kind of guide to group
>>> behaviour
>>> perhaps.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Kim.
>>Sarah,
I totally see what you're saying, and I'm not trying to stifle discussions
like that, though if they're OT they should be in the appropriate group mostly,
but if we can't talk about what we want, as well as nut things out, whatever
it be, then the world would be a lesser place.
But I do need to cater to:
(*) Those who are getting genuinely irritated, or worse.
(*) Those who don't like things too OT
What you're saying is, I think, a lot like Don often points out, that many
of us would get along much better if we were actually in a bar somewhere
chilling out face to face, than what we sometimes see here, and if they could
see your body language and see that you're relaxed and there's no need to
get worked up, it would all work much better. Genuine friendship requires
honesty though, so we have to find a balance between ensuring that a group
exists where things are mostly on topic, as well as ensuring that nobody
genuinely gets upset. A little playful proddi
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mike Audet can you do that ????? [message #96465 is a reply to message #96462] |
Sun, 02 March 2008 08:41 |
mike audet[1]
Messages: 129
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ver wanted to
be
>> a moderator. I'm much the same, and I think the spirit of the group has
>> always
>> been that we sort out our own issues amongst ourselves without a
>> moderator.
>> I think this has worked well in creating a group of people who are open
>> and
>> honest with each other, but recently we've struggled with a lot of this
>> stuff.
>>
>> I'm also half pondering creation of a Paris NG usage policy of some sort,
>> which gives a guide to decorum and approach which is expected. That's
just
>> food for thought at the moment.
>>
>> Right now however I just want to ask that everybody chill out. Resist
that
>> temptation to post back your witty retort to whoever you thought was out
>> of line. Let it sit for a bit.
>>
>> What's more important to me right now than anything is getting some
>> positive
>> input into the group, and I think we have heard enough of the arguments
>> for
>> a bit. So I'll ask you all, for a couple of days at least:
>>
>> (*) If it's an argument, just let it go. I don't care if your comment
is
>> arguably warranted. What's warranted more is some peace and harmony in
the
>> group.
>>
>> (*) Think of something On Topic to post. New music software or plug info.
>> An instrument you're planning to buy. Whatever.
>>
>> Later today I hope to clear off some of these messy threads and we can
>> pretend
>> it never happened for a bit. Let's see the group become a little more
of
>> a community again. If there's one thing everybody agrees on it's that
>> there's
>> too much discord, so let's simply avoid it for a bit.
>>
>> I'll rename the groups, and we'll look at some kind of guide to group
>> behaviour
>> perhaps.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kim.
>
>My question would be...why are they recording that stuff in the US???
They're really not that special at all, most pub bands sound as good, (if
not better).
Look at ...
www.grimick.com/
http://www.richerbert.com/index.html
On 8/05/08 12:47 AM, in article 4821c104$1@linux, "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>
> I forgot to ask. hehe I was never into details. hahaBTW, Grimick are exclusively Paris...everything they've recorded is with
Paris, for over 9 years.
Martin H
On 8/05/08 12:47 AM, in article 4821c104$1@linux, "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>
> I forgot to ask. hehe I was never into details. hahaHi All,
I can't believe I got it done, but here it is!
This things sounds so smooth that it will blow your mind.
You can run two instances per card, and all the DSP power is going to very
good use. You just have to hear this.
You can order it at www.ensoniq.ca. I've continued to leave the pricing
as "Pay what you can." Please be fair with this if you value these plugins.
As always, let me know what you think!WoooHOOOOO!
- Kerry
On 5/7/08 5:31 PM, in article 482249dc$1@linux, "Mike Audet" <mike@....>
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I can't believe I got it done, but here it is!
>
> This things sounds so smooth that it will blow your mind.
>
> You can run two instances per card, and all the DSP power is going to very
> good use. You just have to hear this.
>
> You can order it at www.ensoniq.ca. I've continued to leave the pricing
> as "Pay what you can." Please be fair with this if you value these plugins.
>
>
> As always, let me know what you think!
>
>
>
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C8B084.7770EC40
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mr. Audet you are doing good things for me and my clients.
Thanks again !
Tom
"Kerry Galloway" <kg@kerrygalloway.com> wrote in message =
news:C447962B.AEE9%kg@kerrygalloway.com...
WoooHOOOOO!
- Kerry
On 5/7/08 5:31 PM, in article 482249dc$1@linux, "Mike Audet" =
<mike@....>
wrote:
>=20
> Hi All,
>=20
> I can't believe I got it done, but here it is!
>=20
> This things sounds so smooth that it will blow your mind.
>=20
> You can run two instances per card, and all the DSP power is going =
to very
> good use. You just have to hear this.
>=20
> You can order it at www.ensoniq.ca. I've continued to leave the =
pricing
> as "Pay what you can." Please be fair with this if you value these =
plugins.
>=20
>=20
> As always, let me know what you think!
>=20
>=20
> =20
>=20
>=20
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C8B084.7770EC40
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2180" name=3DGENERATOR&
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mike Audet can you do that ????? [message #96466 is a reply to message #96465] |
Sun, 02 March 2008 08:23 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Mr. Audet you are doing good things for =
me and my=20
clients.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks again !</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Kerry Galloway" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:kg@kerrygalloway.com">kg@kerrygalloway.com</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:C447962B.AEE9%kg@kerrygalloway.com">news:C447962B.AEE9%kg@ke=
rrygalloway.com</A>...</DIV>WoooHOOOOO!<BR><BR>-=20
Kerry<BR><BR><BR>On 5/7/08 5:31 PM, in article <A=20
href=3D"mailto:482249dc$1@linux">482249dc$1@linux</A>, "Mike Audet"=20
<mike@....><BR>wrote:<BR><BR>> <BR>> Hi All,<BR>> =
<BR>> I=20
can't believe I got it done, but here it is!<BR>> <BR>> This =
things=20
sounds so smooth that it will blow your mind.<BR>> <BR>> You can =
run two=20
instances per card, and all the DSP power is going to very<BR>> =
good=20
use. You just have to hear this.<BR>> <BR>> You can order =
it at <A=20
href=3D"http://www.ensoniq.ca">www.ensoniq.ca</A>. I've =
continued to leave=20
the pricing<BR>> as "Pay what you can." Please be fair with =
this if=20
you value these plugins.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> As always, let me =
know what=20
you think!<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>>=20
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY ></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C8B084.7770EC40--"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>I like your thinking on this. I do want to say something (perhaps in my
own
>defense?), which is just that some of us might not be as angry or combative
>as we sound. Like when DJ and/or Don and I get into something . . . I know
>it gets noisy and sarcastic at times, but I think we just like to "rassle,"
>test out our own points of view. I never hang on to it or take things
>personally. I just like the unfiltered banter. :)
>
>S
;)Jeff H <jkhoover@nospam+excite.com> wrote:
>zmora wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Anyone knows this preamp-processor? Any opinion?
>I have one and have used it on a variety of inputs. Loved the brick
>wall for taking in rap and some vocalists. Seemed to be a little
>sterile for acoutic guitar for my tastes (like it a little warmer).
>
>JH
Probably the best preamp I've ever used on an AEA R84. It just gets out
of the way, lets that beautiful silky top end of the mic do it's magic and
has plenty of gain. The comp/limiter is totally transparent (unless horrendously
abused). I'm still kicking myself for selling one that I had. I thought I
would like my Focusrite RED7 better so I decided the P1 was redundant. I
missed it almost the minute it left here. I think the P1 was equal or superior
to the RED7 when paired with an AEA R84 or an SE R-1 (the two ribbons I have
used it with). I've got one of the old, much sought after RED7's with the
input tranny that are selling for around $4k nowadays and it's a nice one,
so this is some high praise. I do agree with you about the P1's lack of personality
thought. I guess that's what makes it right for some mics though. You hear
the signal and mic and not the pre.
The next preamp I buy will probaly be another P1 to replace the one I sold.
:o)Hi Gantt..I used have a stereo rig back in the 70's .with a Blackface Twin
on one pickup,and a Marshall Plexi 50 watt on the other.(both of which I
still own) .. I had an Alembic guitar,and it had a stereo XLR output
jack..It's alot of trouble ,but it does sound great..I like to use 2 small
amps,with a switchbox..Eric Johnson really gets the most killer variety of
tones of anybody..he uses 4 amps..2 Deluxe Reverbs,and 2 Plexi 50 watt,with
various echoplexes and overdrives...take care, Zan
"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:4821c041@linux...
> That does sound kind of fun.
>
> Gantt Kushner wrote:
> > And while I'm having potentially stupid thoughts...
> >
> > Suppose you wired a guitar to send the treble PU out of one jack and the
> > neck (and middle, if there is one) PUs out of another. Then, you design
> > an amp with two switchable channels so you could, for example, have the
bridge
> > PU going thru a big, fat, saturated Dumble-esque (please don't sue me,
Alexander!)
> > high gain channel and the other PU(s) thru a shimmering, warm clean
channel.
> > Flip the selector switch to go from lead to rhythm. Or run both at the
> > same time for fat, sustaining distortion w/ a nice clear, articulated
note
> > underneath. Or switch the amp around to have a little crunch on the
neck/mid
> > PU and bright, clean Tele twang on the bridge PU. You could start the
experiment
> > by wiring a guitar in stereo and using two amps.
> >
> > Hmmm. I might have found a use for some of my down-time this week!
> >
> > GanttNo one I'd rather 'rassle with. I must say that it is really nice to have
an agile mind and strong convictions in friends so that our lives aren't
little echo chambers of our own views. It is great to have my views
challenged! How else do we ever learn anything?
Not to be all sensitive here, but there is a group of good folks here,
and I think we need to value that.
DC
>"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>>I like your thinking on this. I do want to say s
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun May 17 06:41:47 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.67217 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
