| OK Gang... get ready to SHIT YOUR PANTS!!! [message #89301] |
Mon, 03 September 2007 19:56  |
Nei
Messages: 108 Registered: November 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
d work in my case, because of
>where it's located & that it's still small in size & hasn't
>spread much, so I don't really have to be concerned
>about "which one will be most effective?" IOW, I need to find
>out how much is not enough, how much is too much, and how much
>is "just right" for being able to effectively employ a
>prosthesis from a musician's standpoint. Might help me make a
>more educated decision.
>
>Anyway, if anybody knows of anyone, that'd be great; I'd sure
>appreciate it. Lemme know!
>
>NeilI ran Paris for years on XP, and never, never had any issues apart from the
lack of Paris functionality for my needs
--
Martin Harrington
Lend An Ear Sound
Sydney Australia
0414 913 247
"Kerr Mathieson" <oneninehundred@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:470dd6e1$1@linux...
> I'm using ME 'cause I know it runs Paris fine. I only use this machine
> for paris and cubase, that's it. guess I might have to consider moving to
> XP if I can be sure Paris runs ok
>
> "Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> news:470d66c5@linux...
>> Why on earth are you still running ME?
>> It is a dinosaur by today's standards.
>>
>> Martin Harrington
>> Lend An Ear Sound
>> Sydney, Australia
>> 0414913247
>>
>> "Kerr Mathieson" <oneninehundred@virgin.net> wrote in message
>> news:470d4c41$1@linux...
>>> yeah, I double checked and checked again (and then once more!), they're
>>> in the same plugins folder as everything else.
>>>
>>> I knew the .dll files were library files, which is what confused me the
>>> most about the wavelab message lol!
>>>
>>> Think I'll download them in all forms and unpack/install and see what
>>> happens. Still think it might be something to do with running ME
>>> though, 'cause the modern site says 2000/XP for system req.
>>>
>>> hmmmmm
>>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK Gang... get ready to SHIT YOUR PANTS!!! [message #89302 is a reply to message #89301] |
Mon, 03 September 2007 21:39   |
LaMont
Messages: 828 Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> "Neil" <IOOI@OIU.com> wrote in message news:470d3717$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> "Kerr Mathieson" <oneninehundred@virgin.net> wrote:
>>>>>Hi neil,
>>>>>
>>>>>I downloaded the pack with the installer in it and it seemed to unrar
>>>>>properly,
>>>>>
>>>>>then the exe file seemed to install properly as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>I've just discovered that when I boot up Wavelab, it tries to run the
>>>>>plug
>>>>
>>>>>ins too and keeps giving me a message that there's a library file
>>>>>missing,
>>>>
>>>>>for every modern plug in. wierd. there's only a .dll file for each
>>>>>one
>>>>
>>>>>came from the exe file, so I'm kinda stuck!
>>>>
>>>> In that case, I have a feeling that you may have installed them
>>>> into the wrong vstplugins folder. Is that possible? Do you have
>>>> more than one of those on your hard drive?
>>>>
>>>> A .dll file IS a library file.
>>>>
>>>> Neil
>>>
>> All types of Audio Post
>Hi Aaron,
Thanks for offering to donate and for letting me know about this. I just
tried recreating the buttons, but they still don't work. We'll see what Paypal
has to say.
My email address is Mike AT MikeAudet DOT COM.
Cheers!
Mike
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>what email address do I send paypal to bro? the ensoniq.ca page is taking
me
>to an errored out paypal webpage.
>
>AA
>
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote in message news:470d92dd$1@linux...
>>
>> Yo!
>>
>> "The Ducker" is now posted at www.ensoniq.ca for your downloading
>> pleasure.
>>
>> The Ducker is the first side chain compressor for the PARIS system. Based
>> on the PARIS Compressor, it compresses the left signal based on the right
>> input, allowing for ducking or creating new sounds by altering the side
>> chain
>> signal with eq or distortion.
>>
>> Let me know what you think!
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>
>Hi Tom,
The right channel isn't passed at all. The output is the left side on both
the right and left output (mono over two channels).
The idea I had was you can set the compressed channel's effect send to pre-fader
and then mute it. The output of the effe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK Gang... get ready to SHIT YOUR PANTS!!! [message #89356 is a reply to message #89323] |
Thu, 06 September 2007 05:39   |
Bart
 Messages: 2 Registered: September 2007
|
Junior Member |
|
|
s that for maximum control and sensation post-surgery, you would
>want to preserve the bone.
>
> Actually, I broke my right index finger many years ago with gigs to
>play, and I got pretty good pretty fast at holding the pick with my middle,
>ring, and thumb ( I'm a 3 fingered pick holder, when I use them). Just
a
>thought.
>
> Sorry to hear about this, but glad that it's small and unlikely to
>metastasize. I'd be pissed, too. I hate when life throws stuff like this
>at us. But you sound positive and I think you'll do great.
Hey Sarah - I tried that last night (holding the pick with
my middle finger) and it works to some extent, but it changes
the pivot point of your wrist, so some things work fine, while
others don't work too well at all (picking on the high strings
is difficult, for example... I can't keep my hand anchored in
the same place on the bridge as I can with using thumb & index
finger, so that's something that would have to be adapted
to/re-learned.
Anyway, yeah I'm positive overall about it - I mean it's a
major annoyance, but like I said it's limited to one area, it's
not going to spread, it can't
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK Gang... get ready to SHIT YOUR PANTS!!! [message #89357 is a reply to message #89356] |
Thu, 06 September 2007 06:23  |
Neil
Messages: 1645 Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
affect major systems, etc. No big
deal in the grande scheme.
NeilYeah and he's also a New Yorker - gotta watch out for those
guys... they're always full of attitude & stuff.
:D
"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>Hey thanks. I'd be too nervous to work with you though, you're all sort
of
>famous and stuff. :)
>
>S
>
>
>"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSpammyrealbox.com> wrote in message
>news:470af7b0$1@linux...
>>
>> Love it - even in its rough state.
>> I would like to work with you on a project some day.
>> Gene
>>
>>
>> "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>>> . . . had it been a real emergency, etc
>>>
>>> OK, I don't normally do this, but damn it, this song is driving me
>>> crazy
>>
>>>and I need some opinions . . .
>>>
>>> I'm linking a demo of a song from the new CD project. It's a weird
>>
>>>little ditty and I just wanna know what people think and also if anyone
>> can
>>>tell me what the hell kind of music this is. Or maybe that doesn't
>>>matter.
|
|
|
|