Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Something else I didn't expect with Pulsar
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Something else I didn't expect with Pulsar [message #75453 is a reply to message #75451] |
Sun, 05 November 2006 23:28   |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
in horsepower. Like I
said,
> >>I love my setup, and it brings me all the work I can handle.
> >>
> >>My inquiring mind wants to know... :) 'preciate it...
> >>
> >
>Are you running the RME in the same computer?
Basically sounds like we are doing the same thing, mine is just more old
school (like me)...:)
"DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
>John,
>
>Here's another trick to think about. I've got a Lexi PCM 91, a Quantec
>Yardstick, a Sony DPS-V77 and a Roland R-880. All of these units have AES
>I/O (well.the R-880 is using a s/pdif>AES format converter) and it is
>possible to route these through an RME ADI4 DD unit which converts AES to
>ADAT and interptch them across as many MECS as you want, as long as each
MEC
>has an ADAT module so you can create 4 separate auxes, each dedicated to
the
>repective outboard processor, across as many submixes as you have MECs
with
>ADAT modules. I guess this is similar to what you are doing with the KSP-8,
>right?
>"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote in message
>news:45667023$1@linux...
>>
>> I generally assign auxs 1&2 to the IF2s on all cards, then mult the
>outputs
>> of the IF2s analog in the patch bay (via mults wired into the bays), and
>> send to the analog ins of the first two mono in/stereo out engines on
the
>> KSP. The other two engines are driven from sends on the individual mecs
>> via 8 out cards. The the 4 stereo returns are brought back in on an ADAT
>> card. So there are a couple of global room type effects that can be fed
>> from all 48 tracks, with a plate on the vocal card and something else
>where
>> needed.
>>
>> The drum card has a TCM3000 via SPDIF inserts, and a PMC80 on another
card
>> the same way. Along with a couple of Paris verbs here and there...
>>
>> Does that make sense?? :)
>>
>>
>>
>> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >Hey John, I'd be interested in a detailed description of how you use
the
>> IF2's
>> >to get verb sends to the KSP8 across submixes
>> >and get it back in to Paris. Do you use adat spdif, analog, or all 3??
>> >Rod
>> >"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>Lamont,
>> >>
>> >>You mentioned in the Pulsar thread:
>> >>
>> >>"My XP /Paris rig is so stable, and with the URS and Waves SSL plugins..
>> >>It's
>> >>mixing dream for ITBB mixing.."
>> >>
>> >>Would you mind posting your setup, computerswise especially, but
>> >>also Paris hardware. I really don;t want to jump through as many
>> >>hoops
|
|
|
|
| Re: Something else I didn't expect with Pulsar [message #75454 is a reply to message #75446] |
Sun, 05 November 2006 23:34 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
as the multi computer thing. I am getting fantastic
>> >>results as is with paris, especially using lots of analog inserts
>> >>and external verbs. I just want to increase my horsepower and go
>> >>to the SSL plugs etc. SOunds like you are doing what I want to do.
>> >>
>> >>I use 3 mecs with 8 analog inserts per mec (8in/8out cards) with a huge
>> >rack
>> >>of outboard. A couple of ADAT cards for returning the verbs like the
>KSP8,
>> >>spdif i/os for verbs on various cards, and IF2's for multing via analog
>> >
>> >>verb sends across submixes etc.
>> >>
>> >>I have one UAD card and usually get a sound I like and just render it.
>> >>
>> >>I want to go to a 4 mec setup, with more plugin horsepower. Like I
>said,
>> >>I love my setup, and it brings me all the work I can handle.
>> >>
>> >>My inquiring mind wants to know... :) 'preciate it...
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>The RME is an external standalone AES>ADAT format converter that functions
bidirectionally. It doesn't interface with the computer other than via
ADAT.It clocks either to incoming ADAT or AES from the source or via BNC WC.
Very handy. Got mine from Morgan. Without it I would die.
;o)
"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote in message
news:45667748$1@linux...
>
> Are you running the RME in the same computer?
>
> Basically sounds like we are doing the same thing, mine is just more old
> school (like me)...:)
>
>
>
> "DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
> >John,
> >
> >Here's another trick to think about. I've got a Lexi PCM 91, a Quantec
> >Yardstick, a Sony DPS-V77 and a Roland R-880. All of these units have AES
> >I/O (well.the R-880 is using a s/pdif>AES format converter) and it is
> >possible to route these through an RME ADI4 DD unit which converts AES to
> >ADAT and interptch them across as many MECS as you want, as long as each
> MEC
> >has an ADAT module so you can create 4 separate auxes, each dedicated to
> the
> >repective outboard processor, across as many submixes as you have MECs
> with
> >ADAT modules. I guess this is similar to what you are doing with the
KSP-8,
> >right?
> >"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote in message
> >news:45667023$1@linux...
> >>
> >> I generally assign auxs 1&2 to the IF2s on all cards, then mult the
> >outputs
> >> of the IF2s analog in the patch bay (via mults wired into the bays),
and
> >> send to the analog ins of the first two mono in/stereo out engines on
> the
> >> KSP. The other two engines are driven from sends on the individual
mecs
> >> via 8 out cards. The the 4 stereo returns are brought back in on an
ADAT
> >> card. So there are a couple of global room type effects that can be
fed
> >> from all 48 tracks, with a plate on the vocal card and something else
> >where
> >> needed.
> >>
> >> The drum card has a TCM3000 via SPDIF inserts, and a PMC80 on another
> card
> >> the same way. Along with a couple of Paris verbs here and there...
> >>
> >> Does that make sense?? :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >Hey John, I'd be interested in a detailed description of how you use
> the
> >> IF2's
> >> >to get verb sends to the KSP8 across submixes
> >> >and get it back in to Paris. Do you use adat spdif, analog, or all 3??
> >> >Rod
> >> >"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>Lamont,
> >> >>
> >> >>You mentioned in the Pulsar thread:
> >> >>
> >> >>"My XP /Paris rig is so stable, and with the URS and Waves SSL
plugins..
> >> >>It's
> >> >>mixing dream for ITBB mixing.."
> >> >>
> >> >>Would you mind posting your setup, computerswise especially, but
> >> >>also Paris hardware. I really don;t want to jump through as many
> >> >>hoops as the multi computer thing. I am getting fantastic
> >> >>results as is with paris, especially using lots of analog inserts
> >> >>and external verbs. I just want to increase my horsepower and go
> >> >>to the SSL plugs etc. SOunds like you are doing what I want to do.
> >> >>
> >> >>I use 3 mecs with 8 analog inserts per mec (8in/8out cards) with a
huge
> >> >rack
> >> >>of outboard. A couple of ADAT cards for returning the verbs like the
> >KSP8,
> >> >>spdif i/os for verbs on various cards, and IF2's for multing via
analog
> >> >
> >> >>verb sends across submixes etc.
> >> >>
> >> >>I have one UAD card and usually get a sound I like and just render
it.
> >> >>
> >> >>I want to go to a 4 mec setup, with more plugin horsepower. Like I
> >said,
> >> >>I love my setup, and it brings me all the work I can handle.
> >> >>
> >> >>My inquiring mind wants to know... :) 'preciate it...
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>I wished ya hadn't a showed me that... :)
"DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
>The RME is an external standalone AES>ADAT format converter that functions
>bidirectionally. It doesn't interface with the computer other than via
>ADAT.It clocks either to incoming ADAT or AES from the source or via BNC
WC.
>Very handy. Got mine from Morgan. Without it I would die.
>
>;o)
>
>"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote in message
>news:45667748$1@linux...
>>
>> Are you running the RME in the same computer?
>>
>> Basically sounds like we are doing the same thing, mine is just more old
>> school (like me)...:)
>>
>>
>>
>> "DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
>> >John,
>> >
>> >Here's another trick to think about. I've got a Lexi PCM 91, a Quantec
>> >Yardstick, a Sony DPS-V77 and a Roland R-880. All of these units have
AES
>> >I/O (well.the R-880 is using a s/pdif>AES format converter) and it is
>> >possible to route these through an RME ADI4 DD unit which converts AES
to
>> >ADAT and interptch them across as many MECS as you want, as long as each
>> MEC
>> >has an ADAT module so you can create 4 separate auxes, each dedicated
to
>> the
>> >repective outboard processor, across as many submixes as you have MECs
>> with
>> >ADAT modules. I guess this is similar to what you are doing with the
>KSP-8,
>> >right?
>> >"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote in message
>> >news:45667023$
|
|
|
|
| Re: Something else I didn't expect with Pulsar [message #75458 is a reply to message #75454] |
Sun, 05 November 2006 23:47 |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
">4565603f@linux...
>=20
>>Tom,
>>
>>If sticking with the 1280X1024 resolution is a priority, go for 19". =
Most=20
>>20's are higher resolution. LCD's just look best at their "optimal=20
>>resolution". On the LCD's I've used, downgrading from the optimal=20
>>resolution makes you feel like you're in the pre truetype days (aka =
the=20
>>jaggies).
>>
>>Personally, I like the extra real estate of a 20". Can see a whole =
lot of=20
>>mixer in Paris at 1600X1200.
>>
>>:-)
>>
>>Hoov
>>
>>Tom Bruhl wrote:
>>
>>>I am thinking about adding a couple of 19"-20" LCD monitors to my =
pair of=20
>>>21" CRTs.
>>>I want to use 1280x1024 in a four monitor setup. I'm looking in =
the $250=20
>>>or less range.
>>>Here's a few questions for those that know the answers.
>>>
>>> Is there any benefit with Paris using ' widescreen ' format =
monitors?
>>>
>>> What parameters are most important for quality using Paris and =
Cubase?
>>>
>>> Maximum resolution
>>> Pixel pitch
>>> Response time
>>> Brightness Contrast ratio
>>> Viewing angles (Mine will be no more than 90 degrees=20
>>>horizontal.)
>>> Color support
>>> Scan range
>>> Native resolution (How does this play into my 1280x1024 =
usage?)
>>>
>>>Any brands to stay away from or go to?
>>>
>>>A few I'm looking at:
>>>
>>>This seems the best price/stats wise:
=
>>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?E=
dpNo=3D1870817&CatId=3D170=20
>>>These are all okay I guess:
>>>
=
>>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?E=
dpNo=3D2323225&Sku=3DA179-2008
>>>
=
>>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?E=
dpNo=3D2606497&sku=3DS197-2016
>>>
=
>>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?E=
dpNo=3D2418924&CatId=3D170
>>>
=
>>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=3DN82E1682401 4111&CMP=3D=
AFC-Dealnews&ATT=3D24-014-111
>>>
=
>>> http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?sku=3D 320-5003&c=
s=3D19&c=3Dus&l=3Den#reviews
>>>
>>>Thanks for all the help as always and happy turkey day to all.
>>>Tom the Turkey
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>>>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
------------------------------------------------------------ -------------=
-----
------=_NextPart_000_01D5_01C70F6B.3614F950
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Jeff,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Your screen shot looks like =
it=20
shows 3 more strips than 1280x1024 allows. That's =
nice.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I was thinking of using the Matrox =
Triple Head 2 Go=20
which seemingly only provides 3840x1024</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>to three monitors off of the =
second head=20
of my dual head card. I think I'll be stuck here =
right?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I guess with this scenario I'll be =
stuck with=20
1280x1024 permanently. Okay then no widescreen.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I also really don't like that shiny =
glass look of=20
some new LCDs. I prefer the flat look if you</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>know what I mean. They don't seem =
to show=20
glare as much. Is there a name for that duller looking =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>type screen?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks for all the info. It is=20
helping.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Jeff hoover" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:jkhoover@excite.com">jkhoover@excite.com</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A=20
=
href=3D"news:4566730a@linux">news:4566730a@linux</A>...</DIV>Don,<BR><BR>=
Screen=20
shot attached at 1600X1200.<BR><BR>Hoov<BR><BR>Don Nafe wrote:<BR>> =
Hey=20
Jeff<BR>> <BR>> Are you saying you can't load all of the mixer =
and if so=20
how much?<BR>> <BR>> Any chance of a screen shot of a maxed out =
mixer so=20
I can see what's not <BR>> showing...would be appreciated<BR>> =
<BR>>=20
Don<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> "Jeff hoover" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:jkhoover@excite.com">jkhoover@excite.com</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A href=3D"news:4565603f@linux">news:4565603f@linux</A>...<BR>>=20
<BR>>>Tom,<BR>>><BR>>>If sticking with the 1280X1024 =
resolution is a priority, go for 19". Most <BR>>>20's are higher =
resolution. LCD's just look best at their "optimal=20
<BR>>>resolution". On the LCD's I've used, downgrading =
from the=20
optimal <BR>>>resolution makes you feel like you're in the pre =
truetype=20
days (aka the <BR>>>jaggies).<BR>>><BR>>>Personally, =
I like=20
the extra real estate of a 20". Can see a whole lot of =
<BR>>>mixer=20
in Paris at=20
=
1600X1200.<BR>>><BR>>>:-)<BR >>><BR>>>Hoov<BR>>=
><BR>>>Tom=20
Bruhl wrote:<BR>>><BR>>>>I am thinking about adding a =
couple of=20
19"-20" LCD monitors to my pair of <BR>>>>21" =
CRTs.<BR>>>>I=20
want to use 1280x1024 in a four monitor setup. I'm looking in =
the $250=20
<BR>>>>or less range.<BR>>>>Here's a few questions =
for those=20
that know the answers.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Is there any =
benefit=20
with Paris using ' widescreen ' format=20
monitors?<BR>>>><BR>>>> What parameters are most =
important=20
for quality using Paris and=20
Cubase?<BR>>>><BR>>>> Maximum=20
resolution<BR>>>> Pixel =
pitch<BR>>>> =20
Response time<BR>>>> Brightness Contrast=20
ratio<BR>>>> Viewing=20
angles & ;nbsp; (Mine will be no more =
than 90=20
degrees <BR>>>>horizontal.)<BR>>>> Color =
support<BR>>>> Scan =
range<BR>>>> =20
Native resolution (How does this =
play into=20
my 1280x1024 usage?)<BR>>>><BR>>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Something else I didn't expect with Pulsar [message #75460 is a reply to message #75458] |
Mon, 06 November 2006 00:09 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
e you saying you can't load all of the mixer and if so how much?
> >
> > Any chance of a screen shot of a maxed out mixer so I can see what's not
> > showing...would be appreciated
> >
> > Don
> >
> >
> > "Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message news:4565603f@linux...
> >
> >>Tom,
> >>
> >>If sticking with the 1280X1024 resolution is a priority, go for 19". Most
> >>20's are higher resolution. LCD's just look best at their "optimal
> >>resolution". On the LCD's I've used, downgrading from the optimal
> >>resolution makes you feel like you're in the pre truetype days (aka the
> >>jaggies).
> >>
> >>Personally, I like the extra real estate of a 20". Can see a whole lot of
> >>mixer in Paris at 1600X1200.
> >>
> >>:-)
> >>
> >>Hoov
> >>
> >>Tom Bruhl wrote:
> >>
> >>>I am thinking about adding a couple of 19"-20" LCD monitors to my pair of
> >>>21" CRTs.
> >>>I want to use 1280x1024 in a four monitor setup. I'm looking in the $250
> >>>or less range.
> >>>Here's a few questions for those that know the answers.
> >>>
> >>> Is there any benefit with Paris using ' widescreen ' format monitors?
> >>>
> >>> What parameters are most important for quality using Paris and Cubase?
> >>>
> >>> Maximum resolution
> >>> Pixel pitch
> >>> Response time
> >>> Brightness Contrast ratio
> >>> Viewing angles (Mine will be no more than 90 degrees
> >>>horizontal.)
> >>> Color support
> >>> Scan range
> >>> Native resolution (How does this play into my 1280x1024 usage?)
> >>>
> >>>Any brands to stay away from or go to?
> >>>
> >>>A few I'm looking at:
> >>>
> >>>This seems the best price/stats wise:
> >>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?EdpNo=1870817&CatId=170
> >>>These are all okay I guess:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?EdpNo=2323225&Sku=A179-2008
> >>>
> >>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?EdpNo=2606497&sku=S197-2016
> >>>
> >>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?EdpNo=2418924&CatId=170
> >>>
> >>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E168240141 11&CMP=AFC-Dealnews&ATT=24-014-111
> >>>
> >>> http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?sku=32 0-5003&cs=19&c=us&l=en#reviews
> >>>
> >>>Thanks for all the help as always and happy turkey day to all.
> >>>Tom the Turkey
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> >>>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------
>
>
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C70F9D.B8C7EA60
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
And that shot is on a 19" flat screen LCD monitor...hmmmm
Don
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:45669410@linux...
Jeff,
Your screen shot looks like it shows 3 more strips than 1280x1024 =
allows. That's nice.
I was thinking of using the Matrox Triple Head 2 Go which seemingly =
only provides 3840x1024
to three monitors off of the second head of my dual head card. I =
think I'll be stuck here right?
I guess with this scenario I'll be stuck with 1280x1024 permanently. =
Okay then no widescreen.
I also really don't like that shiny glass look of some new LCDs. I =
prefer the flat look if you
know what I mean. They don't seem to show glare as much. Is there a =
name for that duller looking=20
type screen?
Thanks for all the info. It is helping.
Tom
"Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message =
news:4566730a@linux...
Don,
Screen shot attached at 1600X1200.
Hoov
Don Nafe wrote:
> Hey Jeff
>=20
> Are you saying you can't load all of the mixer and if so how much?
>=20
> Any chance of a screen shot of a maxed out mixer so I can see =
what's not=20
> showing...would be appreciated
>=20
> Don
>=20
>=20
> "Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message =
news:4565603f@linux...
>=20
>>Tom,
>>
>>If sticking with the 1280X1024 resolution is a priority, go for =
19". Most=20
>>20's are higher resolution. LCD's just look best at their =
"optimal=20
>>resolution". On the LCD's I've used, downgrading from the optimal =
>>resolution makes you feel like you're in the pre truetype days =
(aka the=20
>>jaggies).
>>
>>Personally, I like the extra real estate of a 20". Can see a =
whole lot of=20
>>mixer in Paris at 1600X1200.
>>
>>:-)
>>
>>Hoov
>>
>>Tom Bruhl wrote:
>>
>>>I am thinking about adding a couple of 19"-20" LCD monitors to my =
pair of=20
>>>21" CRTs.
>>>I want to use 1280x1024 in a four monitor setup. I'm looking in =
the $250=20
>>>or less range.
>>>Here's a few questions for those that know the answers.
>>>
>>> Is there any benefit with Paris using ' widescreen ' format =
monitors?
>>>
>>> What parameters are most important for quality using Paris and =
Cubase?
>>>
>>> Maximum resolution
>>> Pixel pitch
>>> Response time
>>> Brightness Contrast ratio
>>> Viewing angles (Mine will be no more than 90 degrees=20
>>>horizontal.)
>>> Color support
>>> Scan range
>>> Native resolution (How does this play into my 1280x1024 =
usage?)
>>>
>>>Any brands to stay away from or go to?
>>>
>>>A few I'm looking at:
>>>
>>>This seems the best price/stats wise:
=
>>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?E=
dpNo=3D1870817&CatId=3D170=20
>>>These are all okay I guess:
>>>
=
>>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?E=
dpNo=3D2323225&Sku=3DA179-2008
>>>
=
>>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?E=
dpNo=3D2606497&sku=3DS197-2016
>>>
=
>>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?E=
dpNo=3D2418924&CatId=3D170
>>>
=
>>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=3DN82E1682401 4111&CMP=3D=
AFC-Dealnews&ATT=3D24-014-111
>>>
=
>>> http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?sku=3D 320-5003&c=
s=3D19&c=3Dus&l=3Den#reviews
>>>
>>>Thanks for all the help as always and happy turkey day to all.
>>>Tom the Turkey
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>>>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
------------------------------------------------------------ -------------=
---
------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C70F9D.B8C7EA60
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2995" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>And that shot is on a 19" flat screen =
LCD=20
monitor...hmmmm</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Don</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A href=3D"news:45669410@linux">news:45669410@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Jeff,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Your screen shot looks like =
it=20
shows 3 more strips than 1280x1024 allows. That's=20
nice.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I was thinking of using the Matrox =
Triple Head 2=20
Go which seemingly only provides 3840x1024</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>to three monitors off of the=20
second head of my dual head card. I think I'll be stuck =
here=20
right?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I guess with this scenario
|
|
|
|
| Re: Something else I didn't expect with Pulsar [message #75467 is a reply to message #75453] |
Mon, 06 November 2006 07:17 |
AlexPlasko
Messages: 211
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
IV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20
=
href=3D" http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=3DN82E1682401 4111&=
amp;CMP=3DAFC-Dealnews&ATT=3D24-014-111">http://www.newegg.com/Produc=
t/Product.asp?Item=3DN82E16824014111&CMP=3DAFC-Dealn ews&ATT=3D24-=
014-111</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20
=
href=3D" http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?sku=3D 320-5=
003&cs=3D19&c=3Dus&l=3Den#reviews">http://accessories.us.dell=
..com/sna/productdetail.aspx?sku=3D320-5003&cs=3D19& amp;amp;c=3Dus&l=3D=
en#reviews</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks for all the help as always and =
happy=20
turkey day to all.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom the Turkey</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE ></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_003E_01C70FB3.010A66D0--"tonehouse" <zmcleod@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>Hi gang...What do I need to run a dual monitor set-up? Is it a special video
card?
You need a dual-head card, and that's about it, really...
nothing special apart from that - Windows XP (And also ME, not
sure about earlier versions) even has options under
the "display" submenu that lets you configure this.
FYI they're not all super-expensive, either; I saw one at Best
Buy a couple weeks ago for $59, I don't recall the brand, but
it was a 128Meg dual-head AGP card.
Neilvery much thanks and appreciation to all who responded to my recent inquiry
as to how I might make the EDS1000 behave like a general system soundcard---
some very valuable and useful ideas/general knowledge, surfaced- and one
very strong possibility---
anyone else with anything at all more to add to the general mix, will also
be very much appreciated---
most sincerely,
harry e.That's a pretty cool idea... maybe you could even use it for
re-amping stuff (have you tried THAT on the B3 yet with the
POD?).
Neil
"DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
>I've had a POD XT Pro sitting in my rack for a couple of years. Sometimes
I
>sit and look at it and wonder why I bought it and if I will ever use it
for
>anything other than the occasional dry track split off from my *real* amp.
>I've always kept a dig
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Something else I didn't expect with Pulsar [message #75469 is a reply to message #75468] |
Mon, 06 November 2006 09:02 |
Dimitrios
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
m-details.asp?EdpNo=2606497&sku=S197-2016" target="_blank"> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?EdpNo=2606497&sku=S197-2016
> >>>
> >>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?EdpNo=2418924&CatId=170
> >>>
> >>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E168240141 11&CMP=AFC-Dealnews&ATT=24-014-111
> >>>
> >>> http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?sku=32 0-5003&cs=19&c=us&l=en#reviews
> >>>
> >>>Thanks for all the help as always and happy turkey day to all.
> >>>Tom the Turkey
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> >>>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------
>
>
>
>Here's another idea:
A couple of weeks ago, Costco here in SoCal had Viewsonic 22" widescreen
LCD's (#VX2235wm) on sale for $300 ea with their coupon. I picked up a
couple of them, and I am totally in love. 1680 x 1050 native
resolution, 5 ms response time, gamma settings which look very close to
CRT's for skin tone accuracy in video playback, dual inputs - VGA & DVI,
etc. Once I 'installed' the monitor software, ie, copied the .inf files
over, my P650 Matrox said "OK, I can do that resolution on both VGA
ports, and give you TV out, too!" Very simple...
I no longer use Paris (Nuendo 3 here), but nonetheless, there is a lot
of real estate available for mixer or timeline screens with these
babies, and I have seen them in the various other electronics stores
(Best Buy, Circuit City, etc) for around $400 after rebates.
My next project is trying to get HD video playback from the Nuendo
timeline onto one of these beauties, as they will do 720p from the VGA
or DVI port without breaking a sweat. Still looking for the proper AVI
file types to achieve that, though...
Larry Upton
Jeff hoover wrote:
> Screen shot is on a 20" at 1600X1200 not a 19"
>
> Hoov
>
> Don Nafe wrote:
>> And that shot is on a 19" flat screen LCD monitor...hmmmm
>>
>> Don
>>
>> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:45669410@linux...
>> Jeff,
>> Your screen shot looks like it shows 3 more strips than 1280x1024
>> allows. That's nice.
>>
>> I was thinking of using the Matrox Triple Head 2 Go which seemingly
>> only provides 3840x1024
>> to three monitors off of the second head of my dual head card. I
>> think I'll be stuck here right?
>>
>> I guess with this scenario I'll be stuck with 1280x1024
>> permanently. Okay then no widescreen.
>>
>> I also really don't like that shiny glass look of some new LCDs. I
>> prefer the flat look if you
>> know what I mean. They don't seem to show glare as much. Is there
>> a name for that duller looking type screen?
>>
>> Thanks for all the info. It is helping.
>> Tom
>> "Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:4566730a@linux...
>> Don,
>>
>> Screen shot attached at 1600X1200.
>>
>> Hoov
>>
>> Don Nafe wrote:
>> > Hey Jeff
>> > > Are you saying you can't load all of the mixer and if so
>> how much?
>> > > Any chance of a screen shot of a maxed out mixer so I can
>> see what's not > showing...would be appreciated
>> > > Don
>> > > > "Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:4565603f@linux...
>> > >>Tom,
>> >>
>> >>If sticking with the 1280X1024 resolution is a priority, go for
>> 19". Most >>20's are higher resolution. LCD's just look best at
>> their "optimal >>resolution". On the LCD's I've used, downgrading
>> from the optimal >>resolution makes you feel like you're in the
>> pre truetype days (aka the >>jaggies).
>> >>
>> >>Personally, I like the extra real estate of a 20". Can see a
>> whole lot of >>mixer in Paris at 1600X1200.
>> >>
>> >>:-)
>> >>
>> >>Hoov
>> >>
>> >>Tom Bruhl wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>I am thinking about adding a couple of 19"-20" LCD monitors to
>> my pair of >&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Something else I didn't expect with Pulsar [message #75535 is a reply to message #75521] |
Tue, 07 November 2006 09:09 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
WOqx2kUd7a3UttrWlCD7T540y7M7WVhHeG5gF7cT6Lq90sdpAlott51 00/6Pl+fQg8RUlgY
Y6lWoVqOHhPFVoPCVas4SpYihy1aKq1MJayhipVadWl7RSp+1lGcPicx4coP 2VF46WDVCrTnVcMN
CopU4q0qVaE6WIcaVZy5pPDRoVISVOUJKEXTl4drnwt1C3i+0Wl9Ja3i2/2m 40y5aCee1j2yuFur
uN7SGI8GNWjgYSFZDG0kcckq+H6o/iLSXaPUYL+2UM6o0qzi2mdSFeW3mKND dIScqVLo2ASCXJb9
ANbtfhL8Q9P/ALI8O+MdT8H6hI91cT6RrFpd6omoyoiyRQJ5EJ8VaxMm/A1C 90DRNLZIjKyZhgSD
ym4+EuteFrO71PW/Fumy+ANLhjvtRk0PU4NbsC85CRafdGKO7t7aa4a4SG5s HMlwZ7qC2kt1nlSS
PrpZrhajhTlz0qsrQVOtTdOc5uyUEpKKlJvReylUW1ptaniYvh+vB8+FtVo8 jlKvh60KtKNknKU4
+0jUp04q8pTnGnd35YNJX+NP+Ehuo32s6ybtxHmKCy4AJxsxnPKg8phnwdoV Q0eJS7YMQJQj5o5A
Oo2ptVw67QXI56biY8Elj1PivRl16+l1Hw7odtpemAslvbv5trdXSg4F3JEH e3t2lff5duGRY0IU
tKu+Uc+fCmkjTlefUNY0jV4GY3UM+lNfaXK7uWheC+tJkMC/ZGhdmeO5AcFg yqvy9nNRcuVyi5LR
pSV1t6X6R6pOyTZ85Khiot2g5QveNS1ozS5WnCU7c190k7yim0ktRyapFJvV pSrgsNsqkbmwqZwj
vtYDO8FVdCMBVbLid/Ekel6VqsCQLd3OtQLa2128rxnSVhuLO4upbe3SMiaW +gSS082QgxQySmFk
EgNchN4Y1tvmsbm01RAHLHTryN3AJDFHhufIm80qVPlokr4BADAE1jXL3FsE s76O5trmGeZ2huop
I5AJkgEbFZgAFPlkcDb8wA+V8NrSXLKMqco8yvdWT6Wvqnvve11KzVndmM51 IpqcJQbtq00mm03b
bmur7OzTfyna+Y/OUJ/vENgEHIOAMEDaynGCTwG68TwatNbOHguJbeQMksUs UkiSxtHzHsZChjIX
uCWBJAKk7qwSwJLKcKQOGYkZxkBGA5zgbtwAZucHg1EzjGTlS2flxjOFI4xu AUqBt2gDJABBY7db
tP3W009Gnbl+Ht17LTd9DmUpJpptNap3d16H014M/av/AGivAAgi8KfGX4ga ZZwOTHp8niPUb/SQ
C65B0bUp7ywKkiNWR4DEqBWfeOF+qfCn/BVn9pnRxFD4mXwN49gXyxK2u+HR YXjqg2rsufDVzo0Z
mwSxkltJwWwST99/y6LgMQhHYcdxhgC+SDhgVbLblO7jBxTWnfIIlYkEkjk7 SflGfxLFQAe4O7rX
o0M2zTDqKpY/FQirJU3XqTpLZ/wpuVPS1l7rXTrY6IYzE09q0nre07VLO6d1 7RS5W7K7jZvZn7ha
H/wVc8IaoUXx/wDBC4t5GLNd6j4S8TR3GXJAlaPTdT0yybeNm5vO1diwXnG3 Mns+g/t3fsj+K51a
68ReJ
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue May 05 18:12:26 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.25500 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
