Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » A long day.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: A long day..... [message #70890 is a reply to message #70886] |
Sat, 05 August 2006 21:28   |
![Deej [1] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "Deej [1] is currently offline")
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
pa.gov/oar/globalwarming.nsf/content/index. html
One quote: "A warming trend of about 1°F has been recorded since the
late 19th century. Warming has occurred in both the northern and
southern hemispheres, and over the oceans. Confirmation of 20th-century
global warming is further substantiated by melting glaciers, decreased
snow cover in the northern hemisphere and even warming below ground."
Read more about global warming.
National Academy of Sciences:
http://www4.nationalacademies.org/onpi/webextra.nsf/44bf87db 309563a0852566f2006d63bb/a3b7c0abdff8ed6485256a8400589ded?Op enDocument
Another science-based site:
http://www.realclimate.org/
Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.comI have an older pair of Acoustat speakers (electrostatics) that I simply
cannot find a replacement for. They sound fabulous, even after twenty-odd
years.
However, they present a challenge to the amplifier driving them: at some
frequencies, their impedance is as low as 1 ohm. That can mean serious
current flowing.
My current power amp is a PS-Audio, and even though it still sounds good,
the older electrolytic capacitors are starting to fail (they dry up). I have
had a few replaced already, but it's just a matter of time before the poor
thing fails altogether.
Anyone know of a decent (but not outrageously expensive) audio power amp? A
stereo unit would be best, but I can live with two mono ones. Would also
consider an integrated amp that can handle this low impedance (PS-Audio used
to make a fine integrated as well).
I figured I'd check with this bunch of audio-inclined folks first... thanks
for any input.
DanielThank You Dimitrios!!.
Very Much.
I will let you know how it turns out.
--
Brandon "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message
news:4506e0c6$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: A long day..... [message #70920 is a reply to message #70890] |
Mon, 07 August 2006 08:01 |
chuck duffy
Messages: 453
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;> 866mghz Pentium III. Pretty ancient huh, but I figure it will be fine
for
>> my modest home use. My ? what apps do I need to run VST plugs, and how
do
>> I do this. Be gentle as I'm IBM stupid.
>
>You're goi9ng to need a VST/DX wrapper. I use FXPansion v3.3b (or used to)
>
>Also what is the best configuration
>> for what I have. I have 512 Meg of Ram by the way. I am up and running
on
>> windows XP
>
>Get more RAM if you're running XP.
>
>except for the dreaded pallett assertion failure at close. I am
>> running my own skins so maybe that's it, don't know for sure.
>
>A pallett assertion FU does sound like it's related to the graphic. There
>was some kind of bug that was fixed with a subsystem patch a while back
but
>I don't think it had to do with a pallett assertion.
>
>All else seems
>> good. Also after the above help hao do I run Chucks plugs.
>
>There should be instructions. I think with XP the destination folder is
>different than 9x but I don't remember.
>
>Anything else
>> you can think of to help me poease feel free/ Thanks in advance Jim
>
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>Anandtech puts two quad cores inside a Mac and reports performance v. normal
>Core Duos.
>
>http://anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2832&p=6
>
>I'm a littl surprised this worked at all. There's also comparisons to a
'benchmark'
>XP system which finds interesting results.
>
>Surprise surprise, mulitithreaded 3D tests show _by far_ the biggest performance
>boost. Those apps work a lot like a well written audio app. Hmmmm . . .
>
>TCB
YES!!
Eight, ocho, huit, acht, otto, BOCeMb, atte, Qk, 8!
geneThanks for the replies.
The way I see it, my options are:
1) Outsource this to someone. That'd certainly be a relief, though the disadvantage
would be I wouldn't learn how to do it myself. Presumably export to protools
(omf/omv?) function in Paris would help here (I've never used it), and then
someone could get to work on Beat Mapper.
2) I have Cubase SX but rarely use it, certainly not for anything this clever!
Any ideas how the audio quantise (ideally to a predefined groove rather than
a precise click) works?
(BTW, all the drums were recorded to a click; the playings just a bit off.
I know, get a new drummer...!)
Thanks for any tips,
Dan
rick <parnell68@hotmai
|
|
|
|
| Re: A long day..... [message #70921 is a reply to message #70920] |
Mon, 07 August 2006 08:25 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
l.com> wrote:
>is that $0.10 canadian or american?
>
>On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 05:46:58 -0400, "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>
>>I only charge $0.10 per edit per track...work is guranteed...and by the
>>sounds of it I'll be able to retire after this edit job
>>
>>;-)
>>
>>Don
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Chris Ludwig" <chrisl@adkproaudio.com> wrote in message
>>news:4500f89a$1@linux...
>>> HI ,
>>> REcycle is pretty much a dead app at this point.
>>> All the major audio apps now Cubase/Nuendo, Sonar, Ableton, Pro Tools,
>>> Samplitude all offer audio quantizing on one of more tracks at a time.
>>>
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> dan b wrote:
>>>> Hi folks, Somewhat unfortunately, I've got some serious tidying up of
>>>> drum tracks to
>>>> do. It's driving me nuts! (Anyone who wants an edit job / drummers with
>>>> studios
>>>> looking to record could try propositioning me!). I've got drums recorded
>>>> across 12 channels, but much of the playing needs
>>>> "quantising", ideally around a groove (i.e. the grove when he gets it
>>>> right;
>>>> or just reprogramming it from scratch). I'm a bit clueless when it comes
>>>> to the possibilities offered in cubase / recycle, but presumable this
>>>> would
>>>> be the way forward, rather than trying to do it all by hand in Paris.
>>>> Problem
>>>> with recycle, as far as I understand it, it that it works on mono, maybe
>>>> even stereo, files, but not 12 at once. Hot tips greatly appreciated.
>>>> Thanks, Dan
>>>
>>> --
>>> Chris Ludwig
>>> ADK
>>> chrisl@adkproaudio.com <mailto:chrisl@adkproaudio.com>
>>> www.adkproaudio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
>>> (859) 635-5762
>>
>Hey Grant, I've used my JVC kaboom for mixing a few times as well. The basss
is unreal, but
man, the mids are great for checking guitar and voice.
Lance
"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4504c8b2$1@linux...
>
> Oops. I suppose it'd be good to actuallt type in a response!
>
> I drive my NS-10M's w/ a Bryston 4B (250 watts/side). I seldom use them,
> preferring my old Tannoy SGM 10B's, but I have to admit that the NS-10M's
> are great for checking the stereo image. Where the Tannoys sometimes seem
> a little hazy in the center the NS-10's are rock solid. They're good for
> checking relationships in the mix (especially vocals), but I still love
> my Tannoys. My real secret weapon, however, is my JVC PC-V2 Boombox w/
Hyper
> Bass. No mix leav
|
|
|
|
| Re: A long day..... [message #70937 is a reply to message #70906] |
Mon, 07 August 2006 13:13 |
Rich[3]
Messages: 132
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
fectly happy to work with electrostatic
speakers.
> >I was using Magnepans at the time for my home stereo and they sounded
great.
> >You can find Parasound gear reasonably priced because they're 'entry
level'
> >audiophile and once most people have had them for a few months the
suddenly
> >enter the 'tinfoil hat and $300 per foot speaker cable' set and start
buying
> >tube power amps 'cause they feel dirty using the parasounds.
> >
> >Every now and then I look in my bedroom where I currently have crappy
bookshelf
> >speakers to lull me to sleep and think I should get a set of maggies.
Then
> >I tell myself I make too much money because nobody needs sonics that good
> >in a bedroom. And then I go to Ebay and type in Magnepan to see what
comes
> >up . . .
> >
> >TCB
> >
> >"D.P." <ottawarocks@netscape.net> wrote:
> >>I have an older pair of Acoustat speakers (electrostatics) that I simply
> >>cannot find a replacement for. They sound fabulous, even after
twenty-odd
> >>years.
> >>
> >>However, they present a challenge to the amplifier driving them: at some
> >>frequencies, their impedance is as low as 1 ohm. That can mean seriou
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu May 07 05:24:58 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01843 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
