|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mic and Mic Pre mod on the cheap! [message #89149 is a reply to message #89068] |
Thu, 23 August 2007 16:52   |
Bill L
 Messages: 766 Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
has 3 PCI and 3 PCI-e available. 6 SATA ports, 12 USB, 1 FW, 1
>NIC. Very solid board. I've tested thses combinations and it wirked fine. WE
>only use NVidia vidoe cards so haven't tried ATI or Matrox. Not sure why
>someone would want to use either of them anyways. :)
>
>3xUAD PCI 1x UAD PCI-e 1x FF800
>2x MADI PCI, 2x UAD pci-e 1x UAD PCI
>
>http://www.intel.com/products/motherboard/DP35DP/index.htm
>
>The board has no PS2, Paralell or serial ports and has to have a Sata OS
>drive.
>
>
>Chris
>
>
>"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote in message
>news:47087eb1$1@linux...
>> The Magma chassis' I'm using are both capable of using the newer Magma
>> PCIe host card. These cost $300.00, but I've got a pretty good rapport
>> with the folks at Magma. I'm sure they would refund me the price of the
>> card if I bought one and it didn't work. I'm thinking that I might buy one
>> of the PCIe host cards and try one of the latest/greatest mobos. Most of
>> them have at least one legacy PCI slot for the other Magma.
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>> news:C32DB982.D5B4%dterry@keyofd.net...
>>> DJ - I won't guarantee great success with it. There were few options
>>> with 3
>>> PCI slots, and in hindsight (not being able to use but 2), I might have
>>> looked at something else. Imho, if you aren't all PCIe at this point,
>>> it's
>>> a bit of a crap shoot trying to get a great board. The Asus boards do
>>> seem
>>> to get mixed reviews, but most PCI boards I looked at did as well.
>>>
>>> The P5W is running well for guys with firewire audio (FF800) and 2
>>> UAD-1s.
>>> I get some glitches with graphic movement at certain latencies (e.g.
>>> dragging the timeline
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mic and Mic Pre mod on the cheap! [message #89190 is a reply to message #89149] |
Mon, 27 August 2007 17:03  |
DJ
 Messages: 1124 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>hi guys
I can't seem to get those antress plug ins to show up in VST or in Paris.
I've got them in my vst plug ins folder, same as everything else.......
Is it possibly because I'm running ME still?
any help/ideas appreciated
thanks
KerrHey there Rod - No I don't have any of the UAD stuff, but I was
really referring to plugins in general - I wasn't aware that
the UAD stuff is apparently even more sensitive than the norm
when it comes to overloads. Have you tried sticking a simple
gain plugin either in front of, or in back of (depending on
where the overload is comng from) that Neve Comp & THEN try
dialing in the amount of coloration you want, then readjust
your gain levels to just below where the clipping comes back in?
That might be all it needs... Here are a couple free ones:
http://www.sonalksis.com/index.php?section_id=99
http://www.gvst.co.uk/ggain.htm
Neil
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>Hey Neil, I appreciate the advice.
>I can't remember if you use UAD stuff or not, but it seems like, as good
>as they sound, one of their drawbacks is that they have a little less headroom
>than some other native plugs, at least in Paris (I can't speak for other
>DAWS). This is just a method I discovered, by accident, that helps you add
>a little more eq on a pultec plug, or whatever, without kacking out, on
a
>track that may have been recorded hot.
>The UAD Neve compressor has a +14 or whatever setting (can't remember and
>I'm not looking at it right now)that allows you to push the plug into "coloration"
>area's, like the hardware version. That's not really doable if you get the
>digital kack that I get when I try it, unless I use the above trick.
>I personally think Paris's strength is in allowing you to push things in
>an "analog" way, to an extent, and sound good. It certianly isn't in editing
>or vsti's at this point.
>Rod
>"Neil" <IOUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlinco
|
|
|
|