| Video Editing Software [message #61899] |
Mon, 26 December 2005 21:29  |
brandon[2]
Messages: 380 Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
still busy buying and setting up Paris systems
for his amigos in the Kansas City area.
I saw him post a few times in the past few months. Try the for Sale group.
El Miguel
"Kim&quo
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Video Editing Software [message #61902 is a reply to message #61900] |
Mon, 26 December 2005 22:07   |
Martin Harrington
 Messages: 560 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
unit, and how it works with Cubase:
For my needs, this thing kicks major ass. The build quality is solid, with
all the buttons, faders, and knobs feeling like pro level stuff. Construction
is at least as good as the Mackie, if not better. The lack of a weighted
flywheel for jog/shuttle isn't a problem. While not as nice as the Mackie,
the wheel has a decent feel and is still usable. I'll talk about the most
obvious difference between this unit and a Mackie first, the missing LED
scribble strips. This is probably what will be a deal breaker for some.
For me, it's OK since I am usually under 24 channels anyway, often with
tracks consolidated into groups. For folks who often run more than 24 channels,
you might want to bite the bullet and go for the Mackie with extender(s).
There are two reasons that I wouldn't want to use this unit for large channel
count projects. The first is that the virtual scribble strips are worthless.
The strip is sized to fit on a single monitor, and the resulting font required
to fit all 24 channels is
|
|
|
|
| Re: Video Editing Software [message #61903 is a reply to message #61902] |
Mon, 26 December 2005 22:12   |
Deej [1]
 Messages: 2149 Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
super small. I'm only 36 years old, but my young
eyes can't read it at an arms length. It also has no grid structure or numbers.
This is basically what you see on screen:
kick snare OH L OH R bass DI bass mic gtr disto gtr crunch keys 1 alt
keys lead vox bak vox vox comp harmony solo... etc.
OK, can anyone tell me what's on channel 12, in less than 5 seconds? The
second issue is the way the bank button works in Cubase SL/SX3. If you have
say 28 channel strips, banking up doesn't change the physical faders to channels
25 and up. It instead makes faders 1-24 now equal software channels 5 through
28. The original 24 channels are now in different locations, which is quite
confusing without a usable scribble strip. The workaround I see for this
is to always work with multiples of 24 channels in the software. This way,
when you bank up, you are changing all the physical faders to a totally new
assignment. So here is what I plan to do to make it work for me: I will
make a default project, with 24 audio channels and 24 midi channels. Bank
1 will always be my audio tracks. Bank 2 will always be my midi/VSTi channels.
I now only need two rows of masking tape under my faders to label the project.
Toggling between banks simply "toggles" between my top label and my bottom
one. I will manage the project so that these numbers won't change. For
example, If I add a VSTi, I get a new VSTi audio channel. I just need
|
|
|
|
| Re: Video Editing Software [message #61913 is a reply to message #61903] |
Tue, 27 December 2005 07:25   |
Neil
Messages: 1645 Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
pen XP and run Digital Performer. They're porting to run on
Intel hardware...big difference.
-Michele Hobbs
LaMont wrote:
> What other choice do they have? Motu has hedged their life on Apple. they
> have to try and keep up as best as possible.
>
> It's funny, a company that is sworn to not port over it's Digital Performer
> over to the ewindows platform is actually doing just that..
> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2006/MOTU-Intel-Mac-Dri vers.html
>
>I use the pitch control of the pro version a lot. I like being able to blend
the Drumagog sample with my recorded snare and play with the timbre by
changing the pitch. If you don't think you'll want to import Giga libraries,
use the midi output feature, or use the "Live" or "Advanced" triggering,
then you don't need the pro version. It's pretty reasonably priced though,
so my suggestion would be to go pro.
Tony
"tonehouse" <zmcleod@comcast.net> wrote in message news:43c68a6d$1@linux...
> OK now I want to buy this..Should I spring for the "pro" version,or is the
> "basic" good enough ? They listed a "DirectXer" app to make VST work as
> Direct X...Is that necessary to buy? Will it replace drum machine sounds
> with samples ? thanks...
>
>Exactly Pete. It seems to align the last software channel with the last physical
fader. IIRC, the Mackie does this too, but it isn't a big deal with the
LED scribble strips.
One more thing, I amde a mistake. The Mackie DOESN'T have a weighted jog
wheel. I guess I was thinking of my old C16 ;-)
-Chris
"Pete Ruthenburg" <ruthenburg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>Thanks much for the review Chris;I've been wondering about this
>with Cubase since the price reduction.
>
> So with the bank switching your saying it just moves everything
>over to align the last physical fader on the 2400 with your last
>channel in the software?So if you've got 32 software channels
>and you switch to bank 2 you would get channels 8-32 on the 2400
>or whatever it would be?
> If thats the case then your workaround makes sense and is
>pretty painless.Just do projects in multiples of 24 whether or
>not there is anything on all the software channels.
>
>Thanks again,
>Pete
>
>"Chris Wargo" <na@na.na> wrote:
>>
>>My US2400 arrived two days ago and yesterday I got Cubase SL3 installed.
>
>>Here is what I think about the unit, and how it works with Cubase:
>>
>>For my needs, this thing kicks major ass. The build quality is solid,
with
>>all the buttons, faders, and knobs feeling like pro level stuff. Construction
>>is at least as good as the Mackie,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|