The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » Anyone using Reason?

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Anyone using Reason?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Anyone using Reason? [message #62579]

Fri, 06 January 2006 09:44

Pete Ruthenburg

Messages: 127
Registered: June 2005

Senior Member

that rumor.
>
> Last week I put in for a HD rig in my annual budget requests. Maybe I
> should research some other options.
>
> Speaking of options, I've been getting some recent emails about Soundscape
> packages, and remembering that they offered incentives to Paris users after
> the disconti

Report message to a moderator

Re: Anyone using Reason? [message #62585 is a reply to message #62579]

Fri, 06 January 2006 09:55

Jorsi

Messages: 23
Registered: December 2005

Junior Member

t
setup I use for batch conversion. I haven�t tried any other methods recently.
Gene"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>I've always heard that the best place to apply these is right into the ass
>end of the preamp........sorta like an audio suppository......however, as
>much as I enjoy the occasional crawl through the snakepit behind the my
>racks and the contortionistic mojo that I have to do to insert these into
>the nether regions of the preamps, I would much prefer to plug these in
to
>my switchbox between the mic cable and the rest of the snake that carries
>the signal from the tracking area to the preamp. Is this a major FU. Will
&g

Report message to a moderator

Re: Anyone using Reason? [message #62586 is a reply to message #62579]

Fri, 06 January 2006 10:02

rick

Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

t;attenuating the signal 100' from the preamp cause massive signal
>degradation? This would only be done when micing a drum kit, never for
>vocals or acoustic instruments. Sometimes I need LP's on my Sytek or
>Forssell JMP-6 if I'm using them on head mics. I'm thinking it wouldn't
be
>too bad........heck. lots of mics have pads so those padded signals are
sent
>down the entire signal path anyway. what's the harm?
>
>Any LP guru's out there?
>

"heck. lots of mics have pads so those padded signals are sent
>down the entire signal path anyway. what's the harm?"

Not the same. Built in pads a

Report message to a moderator

Re: Anyone using Reason? [message #62595 is a reply to message #62579]

Fri, 06 January 2006 12:42

jef knight[1]

Messages: 201
Registered: October 2005

Senior Member

tched a DVD on it the other night
and didn't even really notice it.

But other than that she's a beaut'! ;o)

Cheers,
Kim.rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>what james said and did your brother also get one???

Funny you should ask. Actually, I was just speaking to him tonight and, yes,
in fact, he did...

;os ;o)

Cheers,
Kim.Are there any Daws have plugin latency compe

Report message to a moderator

Re: Anyone using Reason? [message #62614 is a reply to message #62579]

Fri, 06 January 2006 22:18

Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007

Senior Member

e a thousand
> milliseconds in a second. Each foot you move away from your speakers is a
> millisecond of latency. The latency in DSP systems is fine for tracking.
> The compensation in native systems is great.
>
> Pick your poison or buy a console and tape deck.
>
> TCB
>
> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>
>>latency is a bummer. Is that why everyone gets a UAD, cuz pcs are still
>
>
>>to slow to have no latency?
>>Thanks
>>
>>TCB wrote:
>>
>>>Usually you have to pick your poison. DSP based DAWs (PARIS, PT, etc.)
>
> almost
>
>>>always have some very small amount of latency when playing back, but it's
>>>exactly the same latency as the effect introduces when tracking. Native
>
> DAWs
>
>>>usually have sample accurate latency compensation at mixdown but more
>
> latency
>
>>>when tracking with an effect. I always suggest people track with cheapo
>
> hardware
>
>>>effects if they really need them when using a native DAW. But that's just
>>>me.
>>>
>>>TCB
>>>
>>>John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Anyone using Reason? uh.... yeah [message #62616 is a reply to message #62579]

Sat, 07 January 2006 01:45

Will Wilsn
Messages: 12
Registered: January 2006

Junior Member

> > >>
> >>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >>>Oh God...........
> >>>
> >>>http://www.rndigital.com/AutoMix.html
> >>>
> >>>;oP
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>"EK Sound" <spamnot.info@eksoundNO.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:43d52d76$1@linux...
> >>>> Hey,
> >>>>
> >>>> Found this in "the basement" at NAMM...
> >>>>
> >>>>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Anyone using Reason? [message #62702 is a reply to message #62579]

Mon, 09 January 2006 05:12

zmora
Messages: 88
Registered: August 2005

Member

used on many sources that I am familiar with so I am
not totally alien to these. As for the Gemini, well, it's certainly Chinese,
but it doesn't sound cheap or childish, at least the one I have here...and
there is no overly hyped top end to it like I hear with the Studio Projects
mics. It isn't a flat mic, but then again, neither is my U87 with the
Stephen Paul 3 micron capsule. They both have a presence peak.

You have me very curious now to do a side by side comparison for myself with
the Gemini a

Report message to a moderator

Re: Anyone using Reason? [message #62704 is a reply to message #62579]

Mon, 09 January 2006 05:18

zmora
Messages: 88
Registered: August 2005

Member

I will offer 15 day trial - money back guarantee.
> I have tried all these U47 clones and nothing sounds to me even close to
> a real U47.
> These chinese capsules are childish to my ears.
> Lack of midrange too
> much highs (which apparently are distortion perceived as "more highs"!)
> Regards,
> Dimitrios
>
>
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >Dimitrios,
> >
> >This sounds like a nice project, but the SE Gemini

Report message to a moderator

Re: Anyone using Reason? [message #62764 is a reply to message #62614]

Mon, 09 January 2006 19:54

Chris Ludwig

Messages: 868
Registered: May 2006

Senior Member

. If you use the aux sends, you can select external on
>>>>each aux bus and hard pan to get up to 16 sends per MEC. Using inserts,
>>>>you have to patch the inputs of the inserts as well as the outputs... it
>>>>doesn't matter if you are only using them to send sound, you must patch a
>>>>return signal for them to become active. I believe the same holds true
>>>>for the Aux buses.
>>>>
>>>>As for CEP... I thought is only had the capability to record two tracks
>>>>at once??? Double check this, but I am positive it can only accept two.
>>>>
>>>>I'll be at the studio in the morning if you are still stuck. I would call
>>>>now, but it's after midnight now on your end.
>>>>
>>>>David.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Don Nafe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I'm trying to route the individual PAris tracks 1-8 to CEPro...
>>>>>
>>>>>ADAT is in slot 1 input and slot 1 output...
>>>>>
>>>>>MEC module A is in the patchfield as is the Master, Mixer A and Inserts
>>>>>A
>>>>>
>>>>>Supposedly whatever is on tr 1-8 is normaled to ADAT tr 1-8 in that
>>>>>configuration - Correct?
>>>>>
>>>>>as it stands only Paris Tr 1 & 2 are making it over to CEPro
>>>>>
>>>>>If you'd rather do this real time call me 613 725 3327 collect
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Dave(EK Sound)" <audioguy_editout_@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>news:43dcec1e$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Are you trying to route individual

Report message to a moderator

Re: Anyone using Reason? [message #62771 is a reply to message #62764]

Mon, 09 January 2006 22:10

Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007

Senior Member

/> >>>>>>you runn HD on a PC, beter for you becuase you can run a whole lot of
>>>>
>>>>Rtas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>plugins.. But, if you only have a old G4, so-what, you're still gonna
>>>>
>>>>get
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>taht stated track/DSP count...very smothly indeed.. No more bashing
>>>
>>>Digi
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>for me.. I've seen the light..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>LaMont
>>>>>>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Not nearly complicated enough ;o)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Seriously, I have thought about it.....a lot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Deej
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>news:43dd826c$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>DJ... Pro Tools HD2/3, with apogee AD/DA 16xs(2) converters..Monster
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Sound,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Killer i/o routing for your stand alones.. All under one roof. Do
>>>
>>>the
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>$$math$$$
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>:)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>what approaches???..............humm.......well....here it is in
>>>
>>>a
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>>nutshell.....;oP
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>A typical session is usually tracked and mixed as follows:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>All tracking is usually done in Paris using a Furman HDS 16 cue
>>>>
>>>>system
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>with
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>3 x HRM 16 remotes. Paris latency is 1.25 ms at 44.1kHz, 1.5ms at
>>>>>
>>>>>48kHz.
>>>>>

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	FYI, New cable tester
Next Topic:	External Processing

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed May 06 01:51:57 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08769 seconds