Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » I'm moving on.
|
|
|
|
| Re: I'm moving on. [message #74121 is a reply to message #74120] |
Mon, 16 October 2006 00:58   |
Jeremy Luzier
Messages: 102
Registered: November 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Here it is.</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Comp #1: Paris is running =
>=3D
> >very well on a=3D20
> > XP P4 3.0 and all the goodies. 2 active</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial=3D20
> > =3D
> >size=3D3D2> &nbs=3D
> >p; =3D20
> > ADAT cards along with 32 A-D, D-As, two SPDIFS and a UAD-1 =
>stocked =3D
> >for=3D20
> > good measure.</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Comp #2: Cubase Studio 4 on
=
>=3D
> >my new AMD=3D20
> > 4800+ Dualcore with Creamware</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial=3D20
> > =3D
> >size=3D3D2> &nbs=3D
> >p; 14=3D20
> > chip Pro card with 20 In/out and Delta 66 w/4 x A-D, =3D
> >D-As=3D20
> > and one SPDIF in/out, </FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial=3D20
> > =3D
> >size=3D3D2> &nbs=3D
> >p; =3D20
> > FX-Teleport Host to comp below</FONT><FONT face=3D3DArial=3D20
> > size=3D3D2> linked by 100mbps LAN.</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Comp #3: Spare AMD 3000+ =3D
> >waiting for a=3D20
> > FX-Teleport Client link to Cubase comp #2</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial=3D20
> > =3D
> >size=3D3D2> &nbs=3D
> >p; =3D20
> > via 100mbps LAN. This guy will take up the slack for the =3D
> >Cubase=3D20
> > rig if need be.</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>My application is for heavy
=
>use of
> =3D
> >Kontakt,=3D20
> > multiple softsynths and surely Creamware </FONT><FONT =
>face=3D3DArial=3D20
> > size=3D3D2>plugs of all sorts. </FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Music styles ranging from =
>rock, =3D
> >heavy synth,=3D20
> > orchestral and sometimes </FONT><FONT face=3D3DArial =
>size=3D3D2>in =3D
> >between all=3D20
> > of those.</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>My goal is to have =
>solid/stable =3D
> >performance by=3D20
> > not abusing any one computer in the network.</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Also to maintain an almost =
>=3D
> >unlimited amount of=3D20
> > close to real-time processing power </FONT><FONT =
>face=3D3DArial=3D20
> > size=3D3D2>throughout.</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>I am looking into Windows =
>Remote =3D
> >Desktop to=3D20
> > help with monitor/keyboard assignments.</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>I expect to have 4 monitors
=
>and two
> =3D
> >
> > keyboard/mice combos with one KVM between comp 1 & =3D
> >2.</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>I'm about 2 monitors, a =
>Matrox =3D
> >Triple Head 2 Go=3D20
> > and Kontakt away before I'm all the way there.</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Anyone see anything =
>blatantly wrong
> =3D
> >with my=3D20
> > design? I'm still Scoping it out!</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Thanks for your =3D
> >input,</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2>Tom </FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3D3DArial size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT size=3D3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight
=
>=3D
> >spam, and=3D20
> > you?<BR><A=3D20
> > =3D
> =
>>href=3D3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/re=
>fer=3D
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: I'm moving on. [message #74124 is a reply to message #74122] |
Mon, 16 October 2006 04:00 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
BR>> =20
> AA<BR>><BR>> "Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
> href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> wrote =
>in message=20
> =3D<BR>>news:45542b13$1@linux...<BR>> Hey=20
> guys,<BR>> I am no match for DJ when it comes to =
>this but=20
> I am pursuing a =3D<BR>>controllable version of a monster=20
> setup.<BR>><BR>> I have a master plan that is =
>as=20
> simple as I can figure to pump Paris<BR>=3D<BR>>full of real-time =
>processing=20
> juice. =3D20<BR>> Here it=20
> is.<BR>><BR>> Comp #1: Paris is running =
>very=20
> well on a XP P4 3.0 and all the =3D<BR>>goodies. 2=20
> =
>active<BR>> =
>; =20
> ADAT cards along with 32 A-D, D-As, two SPDIFS and =
>a<BR>=3D<BR>>UAD-1 stocked=20
> for good measure.<BR>><BR>> Comp #2: =
>Cubase=20
> Studio 4 on my new AMD 4800+ Dualcore with=20
> =
>=3D<BR>>Creamware<BR>> &nb=
>sp; =20
> 14 chip Pro card with 20 In/out and Delta 66 w/4 x =3D<BR>>A-D, =
>D-As and one=20
> SPDIF=20
> =
>in/out,=3D20<BR>> =
>; =20
> FX-Teleport Host to comp below linked by 100mbps=20
> =3D<BR>>LAN.<BR>><BR>> Comp #3: Spare =
>AMD 3000+=20
> waiting for a FX-Teleport Client link to =3D<BR>>Cubase comp=20
> =
>#2<BR>> &nb=
>sp; =20
> via 100mbps LAN. This guy will take up the slack =3D<BR>>for =
>the Cubase=20
> rig if need be.<BR>><BR>> My application is =
>for heavy=20
> use of Kontakt, multiple softsynths and<BR>=3D<BR>>surely Creamware =
>plugs of=20
> all sorts. =3D20<BR>> Music styles ranging from =
>rock, heavy=20
> synth, orchestral and =3D<BR>>sometimes in between all of=20
> those.<BR>><BR>> My goal is to have =
>solid/stable=20
> performance by not abusing any one =3D<BR>>computer in the=20
> network.<BR>> Also to maintain an almost =
>unlimited amount=20
> of close to real-time =3D<BR>>processing power=20
> throughout.<BR>><BR>> I am looking into =
>Windows Remote=20
> Desktop to help with =3D<BR>>monitor/keyboard=20
> assignments.<BR>> I expect to have 4 monitors and =
>two=20
> keyboard/mice combos with one =3D<BR>>KVM between comp 1 &=20
> 2.<BR>> I'm about 2 monitors, a Matrox Triple =
>Head 2 Go=20
> and Kontakt away =3D<BR>>before I'm all the way=20
> there.<BR>><BR>> Anyone see anything blatantly =
>wrong=20
> with my design? I'm still =3D<BR>>Scoping it=20
> out!<BR>> Thanks for your=20
> input,<BR>> =20
> Tom=3D20<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> I =
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: I'm moving on. [message #74135 is a reply to message #74119] |
Mon, 16 October 2006 06:45 |
Dimitrios
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Also, just because I
recognize there is a real, and likely threat of more attacks here in the US,
doesn't mean I'm an "overcompensating insecure spendthrift fool
undercutting our own democracy with shifty eyed abject fear". I do
understand though that this isn't some war between two countries, where we
can "negotiate" an end to hostilities, or simply drop our support for
Israel, or change our policy and make everything better. Whether it was
decades of failed U.S. policy or not, these people want us dead right now,
and we have to be proactive. Once we do something significant about our
boarders and make sure we have the absolute best intelligence, defense, and
law enforcement agencies money can buy, then we can talk about long term
programs to make everyone "like us". Sorry, gotta go. It's lower body
workout day. I have to be in shape for all that "knee jerking"! ;>)
Tony
"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:45544bcc@linux...
>
> DJ wrote:
> >>Jamie wrote:
>>> like overcompensating insecure
>> spendthrift fools while undercutting our own democracy with shifty eyed
>> abject fear - IOW, becoming terrorized. Fear sells, but maybe, just
>> maybe, we're better than that.
>>
>> and a healthy fear of a real threat will keep you alive whereas you can
>> die by living in the fantasy world of an idealistic anachronism, or you
>> can face reality, deal with it for the time being and have something left
>> to argue over once the dust clears.
>
> Those are two of many choices. Black and white in a multi-colored world.
>
> Concern and awareness are useful when focused to motivate planning and
> forethought that translates into appropriate action, no dispute from me on
> that. You can call that "healthy fear" if you like, at the risk of
> confusing it with unhealthy fear.
>
> It's dangerously possible, through fear, to react with insufficient
> thought and understanding, and make a bad situation worse.
>
> Ask a military planner. Fear is the path to panic, not the basis for sound
> policy or strategy. Ask any dictator, fear is an effective way to enslave.
>
> "...the only thing we have to fear is fear itself" FDR in another context.
>
> At any rate, it would be inaccurate to imply that anyone who doesn't agree
> with a particular course of action is blind, deaf and dumb to potential
> threats. Not a true nor useful characterization. Divisive at best. And
> dividing ourselves IS one road to defeat.
>
> It's important to recognize what hasn't worked, to be open to better
> ideas. So we can, together, find solutions that help our country and our
> planet achieve peace.
>
> The first step toward getting out of a hole is to stop digging. That may
> be one message of this election.
>
> Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>
>>
>> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:45541a10@linux...
>>> Sure, I hope you're wrong, too, Deej. Like me, you've been wrong before
>>> so there's reason to hope. ;^)
>>>
>>> The prediction that we will be attacked again has been made many times
>>> before this election. And if/when we are attacked next it will probably
>>> have been plan
|
|
|
|
| Re: I'm moving on. [message #74136 is a reply to message #74135] |
Mon, 16 October 2006 06:56 |
Rich[3]
Messages: 132
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ned before this election.
>>>
>>> But should it happen I'm sure a lot of cable TV blatherers will tell you
>>> it's the fault of this election anyway. Flawed logic is still logic and
>>> there's no goat like a scapegoat when the blatherers don't want to face
>>> the possibility of other causes, like poorly considered policy and
>>> action by whoever's not being scapegoated.
>>>
>>> We've suffered al-Qaeda attacks under both Democratic and Republican
>>> presidents. Worse under Republicans with 9/11, but go ahead and blame
>>> BOTH the Clinton and Bush Jr. administrations, or if it really makes you
>>> feel better, just blame Clinton and give Bush a pass.
>>>
>>> Personally I can blame foreign policy back at least to WWI for
>>> contributing to the setup of this situation. So IMO there's plenty of
>>> blame to go around through many administrations in both major parties -
>>> for those times we're in a blaming mood.
>>>
>>> For those times when we can get BEYOND being in a blaming mood, the
>>> assumption that one party or another is eager to invite attack is
>>> presumptuous. Surely there are at least a few real patriots left in BOTH
>>> major parties AND the minor parties.
>>>
>>> There are different ways to attempt to meet any threat, diffuse the
>>> threat and find solutions for any situation. Maybe, just maybe, we'll
>>> get some further options on the table now to meet this threat, and
>>> maybe, just maybe, they'll work better than the current approach which
>>> has hardly been flawless.
>>>
>>> Whatever we do, let's not allow ourselves to be manipulated by
>>> terrorists into strutting around acting like overcompensating insecure
>>> spendthrift fools while undercutting our own democracy with shifty eyed
>>> abject fear - IOW, becoming terrorized. Fear sells, but maybe, just
>>> maybe, we're better than that.
>>>
>>> The best way to be strong is to come together, work together and choose
>>> from the widest array of effective options.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Jamie
>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>
>>>
>>> DJ wrote:
>>>>> IOW, anyone who fails to take worthwhile action because of a
>>>>> perception that it will make them "seem weak" to someone else, is not
>>>>> smart enough
>>>> to be running foreign policy.<
>>>>
>>>> perception of weakenss is invitation to attack, plain and simple and we
>>>> are now (especially now) perceived as weak and undecided. I'm
>>>> predicting that we are going to be catastrophically attacked soon and
>>>> that it will come as a result iof an intelligence failure due to
>>>> democrats restricting the ability of the NSA to wiretap. I hope I'm
>>>> wrong.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:45538a31@linux...
>>>>> I'm referring to any US leader who bases their policy on pleasing or
>>>>> not pleasing terrorists.
>>>>>
>>>>> IOW, anyone who fails to take worthwhile action because of a
>>>>> perception that it will make them "seem weak" to someone else, is not
>>>>> smart enough to be running foreign policy.
>>>>>
>>>>> In individual cases it may or may not make sense to employ diplomacy
>>>>> and negotiation. That judgment cannot be wisely made by anyone who
>>>>> lets themselves be controlled by knee-jerk thinking.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> -Jamie
>>>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tony Benson wrote:
>>>>>> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:455374c4@linux...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We also need leadership that won't let the wacky b
|
|
|
|
| Re: I'm moving on. [message #74138 is a reply to message #74119] |
Mon, 16 October 2006 07:12 |
AlexPlasko
Messages: 211
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
hite House or Capital Building?
>>>>>> Those wacky terroists? Maybe it's that wacky president over in Iran
>>>>>> who wants to "wipe Isreal from the face of the planet". You know, the
>>>>>> one enriching all the uranium. I disagree with plenty of the
>>>>>> Republicans and the Presidents actions, policies, etc., but being
>>>>>> tough with terroists is one area we can't waiver. These people want
>>>>>> to kill us. I'm affraid nothing short of a few smuggled in soviet
>>>>>> nukes going off is going to make this clear to people. Too bad it'll
>>>>>> be too late at that point. Sorry for the drama, but this one thing
>>>>>> more than any other scares me sick.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tony
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DJ wrote:
>>>>>>>> Are you really happy that our economy is artificially propped up
>>>>>>>> with trillions
>>>>>>>> of dollars borrowed from countries like China?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Absolutely not....and who praytell, gave China the jumpstart that
>>>>>>>> vaulted them into the position they are in nowadays?
>>>>>>> Nixon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's bad enough that we have placed ourselves in the position that
>>>>>>>>> we need a constant flow of mideast
>>>>>>>> oil to keep our economy going.<
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I agree. A president with some foresight would have recognized this
>>>>>>>> back when we had the time to di something about it,
>>>>>>> Carter did, but we voted him out and effectively pretended there was
>>>>>>> no problem with our oil dependency for the next 22 years (Reagan,
>>>>>>> Bush1, Clinton, Bush2).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gore probably would have tried to do something.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> especially upon having had ward publicly declared on this country
>>>>>>>> by Al Qaeda. So what are we going to do? Are the Democrats going to
>>>>>>>> solve this? In order to do so, we need to become energy independent
>>>>>>>> *as in..yesterday*. Now how to go about that when all domestic
>>>>>>>> energy options other than drilling for oil in old, depleted oil and
>>>>>>>> gas reservoirs here are off the table whereas solutions that *are
>>>>>>>> proven* could bring this about within the next 5 years are off the
>>>>>>>> table?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm all for clean energy. enough clean energy to sustain t\our
>>>>>>>> economy is 15 years away, at least. We don't have 15
>>>>>>>> years...especially with a p
|
|
|
|
| Re: I'm moving on. [message #74139 is a reply to message #74119] |
Mon, 16 October 2006 07:24 |
Chris Ludwig
Messages: 868
Registered: May 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
arty in power that is willing to
>>>>>>>> negotiate with terrorists, which to them is a sign of weakness.
>>>>>>>> They will be encouraged by this.
>>>>>>> Energy policy needs immediate attention. And some amount of time for
>>>>>>> better policies to help, as you say.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We also need leadership that won't let the wacky beliefs of a few
>>>>>>> terrorists directly control their course of action (or inaction).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> -Jamie
>>>>>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> DJ
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:4553565b$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>> "DJ" <no@way.jack> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 3. Since the republicans have rebuilt the economy that Clinton
>>>>>>>>>> destroyed,
>>>>>>>>>> and it usually takes the democrats at least 4 years to wreck a
>>>>>>>>>> good economy,
>>>>>>>>>> the border control issue is going to be their biggest domestic
>>>>>>>>>> challenge.
>>>>>>>>>> They are going to have to carry the ball on this and if it is not
>>>>>>>>>> effective,
>>>>>>>>>> the responsibility will fall in their lap.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is from an article in the New Yorker that is about a year and
>>>>>>>>> a half
>>>>>>>>> old. The numbers are much worse now.
>>>>>>>>> Are you really happy that our economy is artificially propped up
>>>>>>>>> with trillions
>>>>>>>>> of dollars borrowed from countries like China? It's bad enough
>>>>>>>>> that we have
>>>>>>>>> placed ourselves in the position that we need a constant flow of
>>>>>>>>> mideast
>>>>>>>>> oil to keep our economy going. Very few Americans understand the
>>>>>>>>> danger of
>>>>>>>>> working under the threat of petrodollar conversion. (
>>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar).
>>>>>>>>> But. To also be so far in debt to China that they have REAL
>>>>>>>>> influence on
>>>>>>>>> our policies is unconscionable. This is the hidden economy of the
>>>>>>>>> Bush years.
>>>>>>>>> Funny but it has been very good for The Carlyle Group and
>>>>>>>>> Halliburton.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Last year, Asian countries invested almost four hundred billion
>>>>>>>>> dollars
>>>>>>>>> in the United States, mostly in government bonds. China is
>>>>>>>>> effectively taking
>>>>>>>>> most of its excess national savings and lending it to the United
>>>>>>>>> States.
>>>>>>>>> The Japanese, who despite their creaking economy remain flush with
>>>>>>>>> savings,
>>>>>>>>> bought a quarter trillion dollars of American debt last year, even
>>>>>>>>> though
>>>>>>>>> the interest is lousy and the assets themselves are losing value.
>>>>>>>>> More than
>>>>>>>>> any other nation in history, the United States depends,
>>>&g
|
|
|
|
| Re: I'm moving on. [message #74141 is a reply to message #74119] |
Mon, 16 October 2006 07:19 |
John Macy
Messages: 242
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
4;c.com> wrote:
>
>Hey dudes,
>
>We are having an event @ Georgetown Visitation school in Washington DC.
>The live act just told us that we need to supply the PA. I'm looking for
>someone who does rentals and can supply and setup the following:
>
>1. ___8____Channel Mixer w/xlr and 1/4" inputs
>2. ___2____Stage Monitors
>3. ___3____Microphones (Shure SM 58’s if possible) along with cables
>4. ___1____Wireless Handheld Microphones
>5. ___3____Microphone Boom Stands
>
>
>• sound set-up to include enough power amps and Main speakers to cover the
>total performance area sufficiently,
>
>The venue is one half of the gymnasium (regulation size basketball)
>
>Let me know if you know anyone in the DC area that can help with this.
It
>needs to be cheep too!
>
>Thanks
>Chuck
>c d u f f y @ i d e a c o r p o r a t i o n . c o m
>2 0 2 2 1 5 6 6 70Tom,
Crosover cable should be fine. Just make sure on each computer you
force the configuration rather than let it "auto detect". You'll find
this by going to the network control panel. If you're using IP, you'll
have to manually set the ip address and make sure they're on the same
subnet.
Let me know if you need a specific example.
Jeff
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> Heil,
> No wireless for me. Just a crossover cable from one ethernet jack to the next.
> LAN as I understand it is the network via wired or wireless.
>
> That's about all I know except speed of the ethernet card in each computer.
> Tom
> "Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:4554a417$1@linux...
>
> Are you guys talking about WIRELESS networking of audio from one computer
> to another? (I'm a complete dunderhead when it comes to
> networking concepts, so pardon my ignorance.)
>
> Can you really do this?
>
> Neil
>
>
>
> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Aaron,=20
> >That's the last step I'll be taking. and I was hoping you networkers =
> >might help me
> >with that. I was thinking the onboard LAN in the ASUS A8R-MVPcomp #2 =
> >would do to a=20
> >onboard ASUS A7N8X-X LAN in comp #3. I think a crossover cable should =
> >do since
> >I'm not on the internet with any of my music rigs.
> >
> >Aaron is there a speed/functionality issue with this? Remember 'simple'
> =
> >is good for me
> >as long as it works.
> >Tom
> >
> > "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message =
> >news:45549ea7@linux...
> > What protocol/type of interface are you using for your networking?
> > AA
> >
> > "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
> >news:45542b13$1@linux...
> > Hey guys,
> > I am no match for DJ when it comes to this but I am pursuing a =
> >controllable version of a monster setup.
> >
> > I have a master plan that is as simple as I can figure to pump Paris
> =
> >full of real-time processing juice. =20
> > Here it is.
> >
> > Comp #1: Paris is running very well on a XP P4 3.0 and all the =
> >goodies. 2 active
> > ADAT cards along with 32 A-D, D-As, two SPDIFS and a
> =
> >UAD-1 stocked for good measure.
> >
> > Comp #2: Cubase Studio 4 on my new AMD 4800+ Dualcore with =
> >Creamware
> > 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: I'm moving on. [message #74146 is a reply to message #74119] |
Mon, 16 October 2006 07:53 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
</DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Anyone see anything blatantly wrong
> =
> >with my=20
> > design? I'm still Scoping it out!</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks for your =
> >input,</FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom </FONT></DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> > <DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight =
> >spam, and=20
> > you?<BR><A=20
> > =
> >href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
> >.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>=
> ></HTML>
> >
> >
>I have a mix project that just came in in DP. I need to bounce each track
from the same starting point to import into Paris for mixing. Is there an
easy way to do this? i have DP v.5, but I've mostly only used it for MIDI!
Thanks,
ganttyou mean i'm a VIRGIN again. i'm headin' for the dr. phil show now
for sure.
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:46:25 -0500, John <no@no.com> wrote:
>I noticed their site was crashed Wednesday for a bit so I'm guessing you
>got restored! hehe
>
>rick wrote:
>> just got an e-mail today welcoming to the cubase forum...dated may
>> 24,2004. some serious competition for the post office here.Can you not perform an "export to OMF" & then import that into Paris?
-Carl
"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4554cd4b$1@linux...
>
> I have a mix project that just came in in DP. I need to bounce each track
> from the same starting point to import into Paris for mixing. Is there an
> easy way to do this? i have DP v.5, but I've mostly only used it for
MIDI!
>
> Thanks,
>
> ganttHey Tony,
I never said anything about "a few wacky terrorists."
I was speaking of the wacky beliefs of a few terrorists, a very
different concept.
If we act in our best interest and the leadership of al-Qaeda happens
think we're being "weak" in so doing, it would be stupid for us to be
thusly manipulated to act to our detriment just to impress those few
terrorists.
We should act out of strength of purpose, clear vision and as much
wisdom as we can gather, being true to our ideals, regardless of the
wacky beliefs of a few terrorists.
More than one expert on the region has criticized our lack of long term
preplanning in Iraq before going in. We're now in a situation that the
current (for the moment) policy architects did not anticipate nor
prepare for, and it's not a great situation. Many lives lost and $300
billion tax dollars later, more lives and dollars every day, significant
tax money unaccounted for, Iran gaining influence in Iraq, these sorts
of consequences have been a significant factor in this election. Voters
are asking hard questions, as well they should.
Our various policies directly affect the region and so we must carefully
consider their effect. We will never have perfect intelligence systems,
a perfectly impenetrable border, flawless law enforcement and a blanket
defense against everything nor can we afford that. We can work in that
direction within what we can afford but we must also work in other
directions to help create peace. There is a balance. Anyone who preaches
that there is only ONE avenue of action is probably making money on that
avenue or listening to someone who does.
Yes you can recognize the possibility of additional attacks on the US
without subscribing to the notion that we have to behave shortsightedly
and predictably in order to impress a few terrorists with our
"non-weakness."
Consider that that kind of stubbornness and inability to see creative
solutions can actually ma
|
|
|
|
| Re: I'm moving on. [message #74147 is a reply to message #74119] |
Mon, 16 October 2006 07:52 |
Ab
Messages: 37
Registered: June 2005
|
Member |
|
|
ke us miss opportunities to become stronger and
more successful, and to help create a better situation for ourselves and
for people who live in the region.
Am I being more clear?
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
Tony Benson wrote:
> Jamie,
>
> I didn't imply that you were "blind, deaf and dumb". I respect your
> discourse, and strong defense of your views. I just feel the current
> situation involves more than "a few wacky terrorists". Also, just because I
> recognize there is a real, and likely threat of more attacks here in the US,
> doesn't mean I'm an "overcompensating insecure spendthrift fool
> undercutting our own democracy with shifty eyed abject fear". I do
> understand though that this isn't some war between two countries, where we
> can "negotiate" an end to hostilities, or simply drop our support for
> Israel, or change our policy and make everything better. Whether it was
> decades of failed U.S. policy or not, these people want us dead right now,
> and we have to be proactive. Once we do something significant about our
> boarders and make sure we have the absolute best intelligence, defense, and
> law enforcement agencies money can buy, then we can talk about long term
> programs to make everyone "like us". Sorry, gotta go. It's lower body
> workout day. I have to be in shape for all that "knee jerking"! ;>)
>
> Tony
>
>
> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:45544bcc@linux...
>> DJ wrote:
>>>> Jamie wrote:
>>>> like overcompensating insecure
>>> spendthrift fools while undercutting our own democracy with shifty eyed
>>> abject fear - IOW, becoming terrorized. Fear sells, but maybe, just
>>> maybe, we're better than that.
>>>
>>> and a healthy fear of a real threat will keep you alive whereas you can
>>> die by living in the fantasy world of an idealistic anachronism, or you
>>> can face reality, deal with it for the time being and have something left
>>> to argue over once the dust clears.
>> Those are two of many choices. Black and white in a multi-colored world.
>>
>> Concern and awareness are useful when focused to motivate planning and
>> forethought that translates into appropriate action, no dispute from me on
>> that. You can call that "healthy fear" if you like, at the risk of
>> confusing it with unhealthy fear.
>>
>> It's dangerously possible, through fear, to react with insufficient
>> thought and understanding, and make a bad situation worse.
>>
>> Ask a military planner. Fear is the path to panic, not the basis for sound
>> policy or strategy. Ask any dictator, fear is an effective way to enslave.
>>
>> "...the onl
|
|
|
|
| Re: I'm moving on. [message #74150 is a reply to message #74122] |
Mon, 16 October 2006 08:18 |
animix
Messages: 356
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
jumbo jet into
>>>>>>> our Pentagon, and, but for the extreme courage of some passengers,
>>>>>>> almost flew a jumbo jet into our White House or Capital Building?
>>>>>>> Those wacky terroists? Maybe it's that wacky president over in Iran
>>>>>>> who wants to "wipe Isreal from the face of the planet". You know, the
>>>>>>> one enriching all the uranium. I disagree with plenty of the
>>>>>>> Republicans and the Presidents actions, policies, etc., but being
>>>>>>> tough with terroists is one area we can't waiver. These people want
>>>>>>> to kill us. I'm affraid nothing short of a few smuggled in soviet
>>>>>>> nukes going off is going to make this clear to people. Too bad it'll
>>>>>>> be too late at that point. Sorry for the drama, but this one thing
>>>>>>> more than any other scares me sick.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tony
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> DJ wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Are you really happy that our economy is artificially propped up
>>>>>>>>> with trillions
>>>>>>>>> of dollars borrowed from countries like China?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Absolutely not....and who praytell, gave China the jumpstart that
>>>>>>>>> vaulted them into the position they are in nowadays?
>>>>>>>> Nixon.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's bad enough that we have placed ourselves in the position that
>>>>>>>>>> we need a constant flow of mideast
>>>>>>>>> oil to keep our economy going.<
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I agree. A president with some foresight would have recognized this
>>>>>>>>> back when we had the time to di something about it,
>>>>>>>> Carter did, but we voted him out and effectively pretended there was
>>>>>>>> no problem with our oil dependency for the next 22 years (Reagan,
>>>>>>>> Bush1, Clinton, Bush2).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gore probably would have tried to do something.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> especially upon having had ward publicly declared on this country
>>>>>>>>> by Al Qaeda. So what are we going to do? Are the Democrats going to
>>>>>>>>> solve this? In order to do so, we need to become energy independent
>>>>>>>>> *as in..yesterday*. Now how to go about that when all domestic
>>>>>>>>> energy options other than drilling for oil in old, depleted oil and
>>>>>>>>> gas reservoirs here are off the table whereas solutions that *are
>>>>>>>>> proven* could bring this about within the next 5 years are off the
>>>>>>>>> table?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm all for clean energy. enough clean energy to sustain t\our
>>>>>>>>> economy is 15 years away, at least. We don't have 15
>>>>>>>>> years...especially with a party in power that is willing to
>>>>>>>>> negotiate with terrorists, which to them is a sign of weakness.
>>>>>>>>> They will be encouraged by this.
>>>>>>>> Energy policy needs immediate attention. And some amount of time for
>>>>>>>> better policies to help, as you say.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We also need leadership that won't let the wacky beliefs of a few
>>>>>>>> terrorists directly control their course of action (or inaction).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> -Jamie
>>>>>>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> DJ
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:4553565b$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri May 08 19:02:30 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.75244 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
