Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » DBX 376/386 upgrade info
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: DBX 376/386 upgrade info [message #72268 is a reply to message #72267] |
Tue, 12 September 2006 11:30   |
![brandon[2] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "brandon[2] is currently offline")
brandon[2]
Messages: 380
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
perceptible leakage, and really decent volume lvels. About $99
>> retail, IIRC.
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
>> "Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >I'm thinking that it's getting to be time to replace my trusty old Fostex
>> >T-20s w/ new and better sounding headphones. The great thing about the
>> T-20s
>> >is that they seem to be almost indestructable. I've had to replace the
>> occasional
>> >cable and other bits and pieces, but I've never blown a pair, and God
>knows,
>> >I've tried!
>> >
>> >So what do you guys use? I need phones that can get LOUD without
>crapping
>> >out. I run them w/ a Bryston 3B into custom made breakout boxes. I
have
>> >a pair of Sony 7506s that I sometimes use for cue mix, but I'm afraid
>they
>> >can't take the abuse that the Fostex 'phones can handle.
>> >
>> >Thanks!
>> >
>> >Gantt
>>
>
>So, Chuck, can I run Paris through my Soundblaster card? ;-)
David.
chuck duffy wrote:
> Well I was pretty uncivil in my day during the paris stuff, but it always
> seemed like I was getting dissed on a daily basis back when I used to post
> there.
>
> I really think those guys are way to quick to jump on newbees, and 99% of
> time don't provide any information that's relevant to todays posters.
>
> Chuck
>
> "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>
>>They harrassed and trolled you? Really? Hmmmm......that's disturbing. I
>>remember how ugly the place was during the Paris vs PT wars, but I've had
>
> a
>
>>pretty civil relationship with Dorsey, Rivers and a few more of those
>>guys.........as long as we don't talk politics ;o). The Chevdo dude is
>>pretty obnoxious, but maybe he has good reason to be. Thanks for the heads
>>up.
>>
>>Deej
>>
>>
>>"Chuck Duffy" <c@c.com> wrote in message news:451820fc$1@linux...
>>
>>>DJ,
>>>
>>>Noticed that you were following this. My take is that this guy is 90%
>>
>>right.
>>
>>>
>>>At one point (years ago) I was totally harassed, insulted and trolled
>
> by
>
>>>all those old fools on a daily basis. Hundreds of others have been too.
>>>
>>>
>>>Chuck
>>
>>
>Thanks, I do have a list of a few things i'm gonna try. I have had a few
strange occuances over the years, but resarting usually fixes most problems.
I am actually still running on win 98. I only use the computer for paris
recording.
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>Steve,
&g
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: DBX 376/386 upgrade info [message #72280 is a reply to message #72268] |
Tue, 12 September 2006 12:43 |
dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
E format.
------=_NextPart_000_00FA_01C6E122.0E7A46B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Rod,
I did what you told me and the Pultec-Pro now works. Thank you! =20
I loaded UAD version 4.4. When Paris boots up it still gives me the =
same old message=20
I first posted. The wrapper (ver 3.3) is looking for Pultec-Pro mono =
and stereo..
Paris also crashed upon exit three times. =20
Now what do you think?
Tom
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message =
news:45149fc0$1@linux...
select the wrapped folder(s) in the window and delete them, then find =
them
again using browse I always disable midi, and don't use the vst prefix
Rod
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>Rod,
>That sounds like a good plan but how do I
>"clear out the wrapper"?
>
>I might as well get 4.4 if I'm starting from scratch.
>That Neve 33609 looks tempting.
>Tom
> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message =3D
>news:4513dbc6$1@linux...
>
> OK, what I'd do now is trash the whole folder that contains the UAD =
=3D
>Powered
> plugs, re-install it from the 4.3 exe (it will create the "Powered =
=3D
>Plugs"
> folder again) making sure to set the path the same as before. Then =
=3D
>totally
> clear out the wrapper and make it re-find the plugs. I'd bet that =
will
=3D
>cure
> it. I'd leave the SSL talkback comp out of the equation till you =
get =3D
>the
> UAD stuff working 100%.
> Rod
> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Rod,
> >They were different and now they're both 4.3.
> >Wrapper ver 3.3 won't finish now. I get a
> >"Windows has encountered an error and is closing
> >the Wrapper." or something. It never finishes the task.
> >All my plugs are working except Pultec-Pro and SSL
> >Talk Back Comp. =3D3D20
> >
> >I'm contacting UA on this one. I hope they treat me=3D3D20
> >better than Gene!
> >Tom
> >
> >
> >
> > "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =3D3D
> >news:45129d9c@linux...
> > Rod,
> > I thought they were but maybe not. All other things
> > 4.3 are working. I'll check again. Thanks!
> > Tom
> > "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nodspam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message =
=3D3D
> >news:45129b1f$1@linux...
> >
> > Tom, check your sys info in the UAD performance meter. I'm =3D
>guessing
> =3D3D
> >you have
> > different versions of drivers conflicting.
> > They should all say 4.3
> > Also go to "My Computer/hardware/device manager/DSP =3D3D
> >accelerators/properties/Driver
> > The Universal Audio UAD-1 DSP card driver version and the =
Powered
=3D
>=3D3D
> >Plugins
> > Driver should both be 4.3.
> > Rod
> > "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >UAD Aficionados,
> > >
> > >When booting Paris this message occurs:
> > >
> > >"A plugin was requested that appears to be unavailable.
> > >Perhaps you uninstalled? The plugin is UAD Pultec-Pro
> > >and Pultec-Pro(m). We recommend if you removed the plugin
> > >from your vst plugins folder, you replace it and run VST =
Config
=3D
>=3D3D
> >again."<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DIMITRIOS Re: DBX 376/386 upgrade info [message #72656 is a reply to message #72305] |
Mon, 18 September 2006 20:54 |
brandon[2]
Messages: 380
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt; positioning protocall is selected as the Cubase sync sounce, even if
the
>> RME
>> > transport is set to internal so that the Cubase transport is not chasing
>> the
>> > Paris timeline, Cubase will crash within 5 seconds of the beginning
of
>an
>> > audio track from Submix 2/card B/MEC 2 starting to play.
>> >
>> > Setting sync source in Cubase SX to MTC (with no midi interface
>selected)
>> so
>> > that there is no interfacing between the Paris ADAT module and Cubase
SX
>> > works fine......no crashes of cubase SX when processing tracks from
>> multiple
>> > submixes in Paris.
>> >
>> > Thanks for you input on this Dave. Hopefully the Datasync II will do
the
>> > trick.
>> >
>> > Deej
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote in message news:452403c4@linux...
>> > > OK,
>> > >
>> > > Before you guys start getting too exicted about this, it appears that
>> > there
>> > > is one more hoop to jump through if you are using multiple MECs. When
>> > > looping audio from Paris *through* Cubase SX channels while Cubase
SX
>is
>> > > slaved to Paris ADAT sync, Cubase crashes once audio is being looped
>> from
>> > > two different MECs. This is likely due to the latency between EDS
>cards
>> > > causing a trainwreck with the clocking.
>> > > This will not be an issue to those who are not wanting to have plugin
>> > > automation in SX. As long as SX is not slaving to the Paris timeline,
>> the
>> > > audio passes through the audio interface on Cubase and back to Paris
>> with
>> > no
>> > > problem. If, however, you want to automate plugin parameters, you
will
>> > need
>> > > both machines timeline synced so that you can write automation data
to
>> > > Cubase SX.
>> > >
>> > > I am hoping to solve this problem by sending Paris ADAT sync to a
JL
>> > Cooper
>> > > Datasync II unit which converts ADAT timecode to MTC and then slaving
>> > Cubase
>> > > SX to incoming MTC form the Datasync II.
>> > >
>> > > Thank goodness for yet another kludge. I thought I had finally
>succeeded
>> > in
>> > > accomplishing everything I started out to do and there was this sudden
>> > > realization that my life would have no further purpose.
>> > >
>> > > ;o)
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>You know Gary,
I've decided to keep a Bundle-3 and use it as a summing bus on my old B&W
G3
and build a Dualcore Intel for Cubase 4. I'll see you on the Darkside.
respect
Nappy
"Gary Flanigan" <gary_flanigan@ce9.uscourts.gov> wrote:
>
>"Nappy" <mgrant01@san.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>Gary,
>>Are you going to try and get PARIS running on this box?
>>
>>respect
>>Nappy
>>
>
>
>NO, sadly I am an ex Parisite. I got to the point where I needed to either
>migrate Paris to XP or jump ship. With the (lack of) support issues and
>the increasing incompatability with certain plugs and apps, I was seduced
>by the dark side. M-audio Project Mix I/O and M-powered Pro Tools. We'll
>see how that goes :)
>>"Gary Flanigan" <gary_flanigan@ce9.uscourts.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>I just bought a used Dell Dimension 9100 for this purpose. It is the
first
>>>used computer I've ever purchased, but by the time Digi blesses a model
>>it
>>>is discontinued. The one I got on eBay has a dual processor, decent (7200-160GB)
>>>hard drive and 3 PCI and 4 PCIE slots. It cost me $400 plus shipping.
>>>
>>>Of course, I'll be adding a 360 GB music drive, 2 GB of RAM, a dual monitor
>>>card, and a Firewire card. Still, the total will be under $1000.........
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Nappy" <mgrant01@san.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Phil,
>>>>I'm in the same boat as you. I've been looking at the Gigabyte K8NS ultra
>>>>939 which
>>>>has 5 PCI 2.2 slots and which is know to work very well with PARIS,but
>>there
>>>>becoming hard to find. Ideally I'd like a Intel based board with 3 PCI
>>2.2
>>>>slots
>>>>and PCI-e slots. This will be my first PC so I'm flying blind. I'd like
>>>>to run
>>>>Pro Tools le,Ableton Live and Reasons as well as PARIS. I've been looking
>>>>at
>>>>ASUS P5B Motherboard,don't know if this is a good choice,but I'm going
>>to
>>>>some
>>>>checking around. Let me know what you come up with. Don't like the idea
>>>of
>>>>being
>>>>beta tester but I my have to.
>>>>
>>>>respect
>>>>nappy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Phil Aiken" <paiken@partners.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My main audio computer needs to be replaced....I am looking to put
>together
>>>>> a new PC that will be for Paris and also a native platform that I will
>>>>ultimately
>>>>>migrate to - but not right away. (Leaning towards Samplitude) My Paris
>>>system
>>>>>is 2 cards, with 1 UAD card.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a budget of about $1500.00. What I have come up with myself
>>is
>>>>>an AMD dualcore 2.6 - 3 pci slots and 3 pcie slots - honkin' power supply
>>>>>- 7200 rpm SATA main system drive with a 3 removable SATA drive bay
for
>>>>audio.
>>>>>2 Gigs of RAM.
>>>>>
>>>>>I know Paris can't make use of it....but should I be looking at dual
>processors?
>>>>>Would this send my budget through the roof?
>>>>>
>>>>>Any specific motherboard/processor recommendations?
>>>>>
>>>>>Someone want to point me to the ideal system for my budget and needs?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>This is a must-read (therefore you must read it):
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1004061iggypop1.htmlThank you Neil
I needed that
The bill for the new laptop will be in the mail shortly
Luv
Don
"Neil" <IUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:45243a3a@linux...
>
> This is a must-read (therefore you must read it):
>
> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1004061iggypop1.html
>I'm still lookng into this. There are some things about it that aren't
adding up. It seems that the problem must be when a digital signal is sent
out the RE ADAT output to be returned to Paris after processing on an
individual channel, though Paris isn't the app that is crashing. If I just
stream audio from Cubase SX to Paris and sum it there with Paris in Live Mix
mode......including send effects, no crashing. It's when the audio is looped
*through* across EDS cards with Paris in *always monitro input mode that
Cubase crashes.......even when both machines are only WC synced with SX
receiving no positioning info and not chasing Paris. I'm going to try the
Datasync solution, but I doubt if it will cure this issue. I may have hit an
insurmountable barrier here.......the sample latency between EDS
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Aug 02 23:22:51 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02352 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
