|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Something ADATs are still good for [message #83166 is a reply to message #83162] |
Mon, 16 April 2007 10:47   |
![Deej [4] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "Deej [4] is currently offline")
Deej [4]
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
oft.com/refer
>>> <http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer>
>>> >
>>> <http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer
>>>
>>> <http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer>>=
>>> > >.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0107_01C79446.22F5BCA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Aaron,
Well if that's true that's great! That's the same as a MEC. I've read
differently though. I hope I'm wrong.
Anyone else that knows for sure please chime in.
Tom =20
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message =
news:46456d53$1@linux...
442?
20 bits on the analogs, 24 on the SpDif was the spec I believe.
AA
"Jeff Hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message =
news:46455183@linux...
> Tom
>
> Like ROd and others I'm going digital to a DAC1, but me it's off the =
> S/PDIF on the 442. How many bits is that thing?
>
> I just like having all my 24 bit inputs off the master card for =
recording,=20
> and I'm too lazy to move things around after I record. I think =
either way=20
> will work. I cannot stress enough the importance of GREAT SYNC in =
this=20
> situation. I wrestled waaaaaay too many hours before I finally put =
in=20
> word clock cables all the same length and of good quality. Once I =
got=20
> them all the same hooked to the Lucid GenX, everything has been =
smooth=20
> sailing (except for the occasional experience of Auto tune starting =
up at=20
> the wrong sample rate. I really though I stunk as a singer until I =
looked=20
> up and saw it running a 48 on a 44.1 project!).
>
>
> JH
>
>
>> Jeff,
>> I did that a couple of weeks ago too and it stabilized Paris for =
sure.
>> I get crashes booting up Paris still for other reasons but once =
it's up=20
>> and running it is more stable on the Root C: . Thank you =
Dimitrios.
>> Those other changes D. suggested are still in the making for me.
>> Big stuff there!
>> I'd rather have a MEC on the A card for the 24 bit SPDIF. Are you
>> just monitoring 20 bit?
>> Tom
>> "Jeff Hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com <mailto:jkhoover@excite.com>>
>> wrote in message news:46452c27@linux...
>> Tom,
>>
>> Running a 4 card system:
>>
>> A 442
>> B 442
>> C Nada
>> D Mec with 2 modules
>>
>> Just cleaned up and reinstalled Paris directly off the root
>> (C:]ParisPro) a week and a half ago. Ben rock solid on 5 =
sessions do
>> far.
>>
>> JH
>>
>> Bruhl wrote:
>> > Hey Rod,
>> > That sounds promising. What cards do you have the
>> > Mecs and 442 connected to?
>> > Tom
>> > > >
>> > "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
>> <mailto:rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com>
>> > <mailto:rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com>> wrote in message
>> > news:46451438$1@linux...
>> >
>> > I've got 2 mecs and a 442 working here, no problems at =
all.
>> > I'm also clocking with the old Lucid genX word clock. 5
>> modules in
>> > one mec,
>> > 4 modules in the other. 1 adat card each. 6 eds cards, 3 =
UAD
>> cards,
>> > all in
>> > a magma. Oh yeah, a Lynx one in the computer also.
>> > Rod
>> > "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net =
<mailto:arpegio@comcast.net>
>> <mailto:arpegio@comcast.net>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >I'll be buying either two MECs or two 442s but don't =
want it
>> > >to mess my whole rig up if the 442s don't play nice.
>> > >I am using an older Lucid clock now with 2 Mecs =
already.
>> > >They each have five modules in them. The others may
>> > >see a single ADAT at most someday maybe.
>> > >
>> > >I can make the MECs fit in the machine room with the =
others
>> > >but the 442s would be a lot easier.
>> > >
>> > >Anyone know Deej?
>> > >
>> > >Also I have to find the pin config for a 56 pin =
EDAC/ELCO=20
>> ADAT
>> > >connector. I want to chop this bad boy off and solder =
16=20
>> TRS
>> > >to it. Anyone know whether the ADAT wiring is =
different=20
>> than
>> > >standard?
>> > >Thanks,
>> > >Tom
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>> > >http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html > >
>> > ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0=20
>> Transitional//EN">
>> > ><HTML><HEAD>
>> > >
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
