| Thermal compound or paste??? [message #56711] |
Mon, 08 August 2005 20:09  |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
my V2.11. He is also a computer freak who
is aware that I'm not knowledgeable enough to sort out some of
the workarounds that might be necessary.
Would appreciate thoughts from any of you Paris Vets out
there. I love the SOUND, and really dig the C16, but already
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Thermal compound or paste??? [message #56718 is a reply to message #56716] |
Mon, 08 August 2005 20:59  |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
. He is also a computer freak who
> is aware that I'm not knowledgeable enough to sort out some of
> the workarounds that might be necessary.
>
> Would appreciate thoughts from any of you Paris Vets out
> there. I love the SOUND, and really dig the C16, but already
> encountering a few little snags that make me consider my buddys'
> suggestion. This said, he WAS impressed by the sound of my
> setup!
> I question whether a rookie like myself should tackle Paris, unsupported,
> except perhaps by this wonderful family that you guys are, which is
> significant,
> especially w. archives
> available. I do have the B.T. DVD.
>
> Prayer-thoughts for the Gulf Coast as Rita approaches.
> Kim
>
>
>Hi to everyone...
I was trying the Senderella thing under Me.
The only way that works great is using the EDSTransfer=8,16 thing.
Note that it also works with 8,8 but this setting is not stable , you get
disk errors "too slow" things etc.
Things work very stable with that EDSTransfer setting and senderella newest
version can now save its sttings along with saving Paris song.
So now you can have your bus system inside Paris you always wanted.
There no latency at all (0) when using senderella so you can use your
favoured DX plugin or EDS effect to effect your submix buss.
You can also have a stereo bus summing -effecting thing using two senderella
instances.
I use of course chainer to load senderella but I am surte it can be used
without chainer.
Someone has mentioned several times on this forum that the EDStransfer might
get EDS cards working hotter thus producing more heat.
I would like to know from you who used to use the EDSTransfer
|
|
|
|
| Re: Thermal compound or paste??? [message #56727 is a reply to message #56718] |
Tue, 09 August 2005 00:08 |
Chris Ludwig
Messages: 868
Registered: May 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
are, which is
>>> significant,
>>> especially w. archives
>>> available. I do have the B.T. DVD.
>>>
>>> Prayer-thoughts for the Gulf Coast as Rita approaches.
>>> Kim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>After some nice recordings and editing of drumtracks I am trying to switch
to constrained form to keep edited tracks I get the unhandled exception
error...
Any suggestions ?
Regards,
DimitriosNote that under Me the senderella thing has some problems with timing !
Under XP though it is very solid the timing thing.
So senderella is only usable (in my system ) only under XP with 0 latency
and perfect timing in summing audio tracks, you need though to put 8,16 or
8,8 in Paris cfg for EDSTransfer.
I use 8,16
Regards,
Dimitrios
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:43326fe6@linux...
> Hi to everyone...
> I was trying the Senderella thing under Me.
> The only way that works great is using the EDSTransfer=8,16 thing.
> Note that it also works with 8,8 but this setting is not stable , you get
> disk errors "too slow" things etc.
> Things work very stable with that EDSTransfer setting and senderella
newest
> version can now save its sttings along with saving Paris song.
> So now you can have your bus system inside Paris you always wanted.
> There no latency at all (0) when using senderella so you can use your
> favoured DX plugin or EDS effect to effect your submix buss.
> You can also have a stereo bus summing -effecting thing using two
senderella
> instances.
> I use of course chainer to load senderella but I am surte it can be used
> without chainer.
> Someone has mentioned several times on this forum that the EDStransfer
might
> get EDS cards working hotter thus producing more heat.
> I would like to know from you who used to use the EDSTransfer 8,8 thing in
> the past if you had ny eds cards burnted out.
> I have two big fans blowing over the eds cards anyway.
> I am also considering just to be on the safe side to add these copper
little
> addons that can be put right over the chips so whenever air is blowing on
> them they got somehow cooler.
> Anyone ever tried this or other things ?
> Regards,
|
|
|
|
| Re: Thermal compound or paste??? [message #56741 is a reply to message #56727] |
Tue, 09 August 2005 06:09 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
emely dramatic effect. I think
>>>it was called a model 566. For this particualy application, it worked
pretty
>>>well and it could be removed from the signal flow if desired. That's about
>>>the only example of this technology that I've ever ever heard that I liked.
>>>
>>>I've got a coupleof hybrid preamps here...........a Demeter HMP-1 and
a
>>TL
>>>Audio 2001. Both of these supply around 200v to the tube circuit, so it's
>>a
>>>bit of a different animal.
>>>
>>>Deej
>>>
>>>"EK Sound" <spamnot.info@eksoundNO.com> wrote in message
>>>news:4330696c$1@linux...
>>>> This is pretty common among the low-end tube gear actually... The
>>>> tube is placed in the feedback circuit of an Op-Amp that is passing
>>>> the audio. The *barely biased* tube acts as a sort of an "EQ" to
>>>> change the sound of the audio running through the IC. IMHO, this is
>>>> NOT a proper "tube" circuit, but it does "contain" a tube. As
>>>> usual... buyer beware! ;-)
>>>>
>>>> David.
>>>>
>>>> DJ wrote:
>>>> > http://www.record-producer.com/learn.cfm?a=2838
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>Hi,
That was touph.
You copy your drumtracks to the same EDS card.,
say you have your kick ,snare and stereo OH's.
So you copy these on empty tracks.
then you put the senderella on each of the first set of drumtracks and
redirect inside senderella so that the sending audiotrack does not output
any audio.
you nudge these tracks by 4096 samples forward using any method known if you
use Soinaudio wrapper for UAD1, if you use FXpansion you nudge for 16384
samples.
Then on your reciving audio tracks (you put empty audio file (24bit track)
just after the senderella audio tracks.
I mean if kick is 1 snare 2 OH's 3 & 4 then put the receiving senderella
track on channel 5 and just put the copies of 1,2,3&4 on 13,14,15,16
The remaining drumtracks could stay on 7,8,9,10,11,12 if you have that many.
So now the senderella return on 5 takes the LA2 UAD1 compressor and time
alligns with audio drumtracks 13,14,15&16 and as well with 7,8,9,10,11,12.
I have also a UAD1 but I would prefer using the Sonalksis which is 0 latency
so I don't have to copy and move, anyway here is a working solution
Regards,
Dimitrios
"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
