|
|
|
|
| Re: OK. for you native guys-more RME/UAD/POCO madness-here's something useful (I hope) [message #92917 is a reply to message #92894] |
Tue, 20 November 2007 11:28   |
AlexPlasko
 Messages: 211 Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ts elected proves me wrong.
>
> S
>
>
> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:47869a88$1@linux...
>>
>> Lest anyone think I am singling out RP, let me say this:
>>
>> Hillary - machine politics, angry, corrupt, unelectable
>>
>> Edwards - Slimy kissup to Obama looking for a VP slot. Obama
>> will run from him. Zillionaire trial lawyer phony.
>>
>> Obama - Good guy, good heart. A bunch of scary ideas, and
>> some good ones. If he can rise to the occasion when he has
>> to face the real opponents (the GOP candidates) he could win.
>> I don't think it will happen.
>>
>> McCain - That man has a really bad temper. He scares me. All the
>> idiots who have characterized Bush as a cowboy, when he is
>> the most mild and cautious of men, are going to get a shock when
>> they replace a "cowboy" with a really pissed-off ex POW and
>> torture victim. I like him, but he has a serious temper, just watch
>> him closely at the debates. Yes, he has a right to it, but I am not
>> sure he has mastered it.
>>
>> Mitt - Too much of a suit for me. Too calculating, too little
>> moral center. McCain despises him and with good reason.
>> nonetheless he did a good job in MA. May be a better pres.
>> than public figure, but we really don't need another one of those
>> after 8 years of Bush.
>>
>> Rudi - Best man to have when the chips are down. Not really
>> a conservative, but looks like one compared to the Dems.
>> Why is he behind? Skeletons in his personal life? Trust?
>>
>> Thompson - He doesn't care about the media or image
>> management; cannot be bought. A true conservative.
>> May not be electable.
>>
>> Huck - No legs. Scares me. If he is the candidate, the GOP may
>> lose.
>>
>>
>> I can onl
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK. for you native guys-more RME/UAD/POCO madness-here's something useful (I hope) [message #92923 is a reply to message #92917] |
Tue, 20 November 2007 15:23   |
DJ
 Messages: 1124 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
e ports
>a.. Includes Tracktion 2 and Final Mix software
>
>
>The key words I don't see here are *works with 3rd party apps*, *latency
>free hardware monitoring*, *warranty coverage and period* and *ASIO*.. or
>even a minimum host computer recommendation. Mac? PC? minimum RAM/Hard
>Drive/CPU/Firewire port spec?
>
>Surely some or all of that is at the Mackie.com site, but stinkwater hasn't
>done a very good job of translating that info to potential buyers.
>
>I'd also recommend doing some research on the firewire interface... if it's
>DICE, then it's nothing special and you can expect normalcy in it's latent
>behaviour (that means, a cheapo tascam/M Audio unit will likely be just
as
>fast, or maybe faster, since it's got less traffic because of less
>channels). This is why (Chris Ludwig... correct me if I'm off here man)
a
>RME firewire will kill the run-of-the-mill FW interfaces in latency times.
>
>AA
>
>
>"Terry Thomas" <god1stjt@alltel.net> wrote in message
>news:47869c19$1@linux...
>>
>> http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/Onyx1200F/
>
>drying out my basement after the foot of snow was melted by the 2" of
rain. taking rocks from the rock garden and rebuilding the drive over
the stream where it washed away due to the 3'x24' culvert rotting
away. (it'll have to wait till july to be replaced when the flow is
at a minimum.
On 11 Jan 2008 08:19:24 +1000, "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>
>I'm sitting here doing microsoldering all day...
>
>arrggghhh....
>
>One of our guys on a jobsite thought a 100ft 25pin D-sub cable
>was going away (it was part of the old system) so, to make things
>easier, he cut the end off...
>
>YIKES!!!!
>
>No, of course, it is going right back in the new system.
>
>So, I either put this cable (full of coax RGBHV etc) back together
>or we are out 1200.00.
>
>Ever solder a large cable full of coax to a 25-pin D-Sub?
>
>More fun than a "discussion" with yer wife.
>
>DCat least he didn't say a 1000 years...;o)
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:31:12 -0500, Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com>
wrote:
>Leno had Paul on the other night when he was excluded from the recent
>Fox Republican debate (I love Leno for that) and he said he would pull
>every soldier (about 1/2 mill) we have on foreign soil back home and
>save us hundreds of billions a year. We don't want to and frankly can
>not afford to be the policemen of the world.
>
>Meanwhile McCain says he will stick in Iraq for the next 100 years if it
>takes that long. What the FUCK! That is the stupidest statement I have
>heard form any candidate. I'd vote for Obama over him.
>
>James McCloskey wrote:
>> Ron Paul clearly says the we, (our Government) Should take care of our homeless
>> and poor, and he doesn't care what race they are. He also says we should
>> help them get on their feet. As opposed to handing out billions of dollars
>> like breath mints to the rest of the world. He wants to get rid of the useless
>> federal bureaucracies. He wants the government to focus on we the people,
>> and not the bureaucracies. Go check out his web site and watch his speeches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK. for you native guys-more RME/UAD/POCO madness-here's something useful (I hope) [message #92935 is a reply to message #92923] |
Tue, 20 November 2007 19:12   |
AlexPlasko
 Messages: 211 Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
is America. Our Gov has has been (for the last
>> 20
>>>>> years)
>>>>>>> made a concerted effort to dumb us all down andslow down technology
>>> in
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> name of NAtional Security. We so behind in so many areas it's saddening
>>>>> to
>>>>>>> think about it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I only read part of the originally posted transcript and don't know
>>> RP's
>>>>>>>> views on race personally (and
>>>>>>>> neither does anyone else apparently) so he may or may not have views
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> would all object to,
>>>>>>>> but just have to interject that just saying someone's "good ole boy
>>>>>>>> politics" makes them racist
>>>>>>>> is in itself stereotyping and just as prejudiced.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> His reasoning for getting rid of the Department of Education may well
>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> because it is failing
>>>>>>>> to do it's job (I don't know if getting rid of it is the solution,
>>> but
>>>>>>>> keeping it "status quo" is not, for certain).
>>>>>>>> Charter schools, private and alternative approach schools are significantly
>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>> successful currently (I have inside info to know this).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lamont, I worked with an entrepreneur (and his partner company) trying
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> change the education system from the inside out,
>>>>>>>> starting with inner city schools. Did you know that urban schools
>>> across
>>>>>>>> the US have an average
>>>>>>>> of 80% student population falling below a basic proficiency level?
>>> That's
>>>>>>>> basic reading and math - 80%
>>>>>>>> are below a very basic level - not a higher than realistic level,
>> but
>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> lower than realistic level.
>>>>>>>> I don't recall all of the stats, but it blew me away just how bad
>> the
>>>>>>>> education system is. Atlanta is in terrible shape.
>>>>>>>> Others are doing poorly as well. These are their stats from schools
>>>>>>>> systems, not political parties.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who's failure is that? Politicians in Washington? Not unless teachers,
>>>>>>>> community leaders and parents
>>>>>>>> look to Washington for instruction when they get up each morning.
>>
>>> No,
>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>> a public problem that
>>>>>>>> "we the people" are ignoring, and it's hard to not put a bit of
>>>>>>>> responsibility on the students for just
>>>>>>>> not caring enough to try harder. All the money in the world can't
>>> make
>>>>>>>> someone want to learn. To
>>>>>>>> the support of students who haven't had a chance, my friend's program
>>>>> aims
>>>>>>>> to correct learning problems
>>>>>>>> that are holding a lot of kids back - and it works - but he estimates
>>>>> 20
>>>>>>>> years to work through the
>>>>>>>> red tape and establishment that is the current public school system.
>>>>> Doing
>>>>>>>> away with it just might
>>>>>>>> save a few hundred thousand kids. They are already working with over
>>>>> 80,000
>>>>>>>> in a private school system
>>>>&g
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|