Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Who was our big time BeOS'er around here?
| Who was our big time BeOS'er around here? [message #95880] |
Tue, 12 February 2008 09:21  |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
nal//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2180" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi Rod,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Who was our big time BeOS'er around here? [message #95884 is a reply to message #95883] |
Tue, 12 February 2008 09:46  |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
that
>scared my clients and me half to death. I tried to go back to v.3.7 but
>could not. UA tech support was useless - they no longer support Mac OS
9
>and no one seemed interested in even trying to help. So, I've pretty much
>quit using the UAD-1 FX w/ Paris. Is anyone else running Paris on a Mac
>w/ UAD-1 v.3.9?
>
>GanttThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C8ABCA.8EF31D20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Dimitrios,
I have tried on at least four occasions to get this plug
doing what is supposed to do with no success.
It installs, I wrap it with fxPansion 3.3, it shows up as an insert,
I insert it on all tracks, I adjust the latency settings to hear
audio move in time but nothing moves.
Is it not supposed to be wrapped? What else is there?
I installed it, uninstalled it, then reinstalled to see if that was the =
problem=20
but that was no fix.
Tom
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C8ABCA.8EF31D20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2180" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi Dimitrios,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Who was our big time BeOS'er around here? [message #95891 is a reply to message #95886] |
Tue, 12 February 2008 12:04 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;>><BR>>> I've been using a Matrox =
>G450=20
> forever, and don't notice distortion, but<BR><BR>>> =
>there<BR>>>=20
> are the usual clicks and occasional dropouts when using a UAD plug =
>on<BR>a=20
> <BR>>> track<BR>>> with edits. (yes, I'm using the drivers =
>from=20
> windows, not the crap ones<BR><BR>>> from<BR>>> matarox) I =
>render=20
> the track, solve the problem. I was wondering though<BR>if<BR>>> =
>it=20
> might be a good idea to switch to a different vid card to see if=20
> that<BR>>> fixed the problem. If so what would you =
>suggest?<BR>>>=20
> I'm still running the Asus A7S333 mobo. I figure it wouldn't be too=20
> <BR>>> expensive<BR>>> to get something else and=20
> experiment.<BR>>> Rod<BR>>> =
><BR>><BR>><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
>and=20
>you?<BR><A=20
>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>FWIW, my rig no longer has the UAD in it but the GeForce cards have been
completely hassle free. If you'd like, let me know and next time I fire up
the rig I'll look to see which nVidia cards are in there. All my G450's died
years ago and I found out that they weren't nearly as snappy and troublefree
as the ones I have now. YMMV.
AA
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4819c9e3$1@linux...
>
> I was reading some tech info on the UAD websight last night and noticed
> this.
> "Matrox G4xx graphics cards users will experience distortion in Audio
> Export/Processing
> results if UAD plugin windows are open during processing.
> Workaround: Close all UAD plugin interface windows before performing Audio
> Export/Processing."
>
> I've been using a Matrox G450 forever, and don't notice distortion, but
> there
> are the usual clicks and occasional dropouts when using a UAD plug on a
> track
> with edits. (yes, I'm using the drivers from windows, not the crap ones
> from
> matarox) I render the track, solve the problem. I was wondering though if
> it might be a good idea to swit
|
|
|
|
| Re: Who was our big time BeOS'er around here? [message #95892 is a reply to message #95891] |
Tue, 12 February 2008 12:13 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ch to a different vid card to see if that
> fixed the problem. If so what would you suggest?
> I'm still running the Asus A7S333 mobo. I figure it wouldn't be too
> expensive
> to get something else and experiment.
> Rod
>I did have doubts.... this addresses them... useful info... Danke'!
AA
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:481a8c65$1@linux...
>
> For those who had any question.
>
> http://www.macworld.co.uk/procreative/news/index.cfm?newsid= 21188Yeah, let me know what your using. Your still using the Asus mobo, right?
Rod
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>FWIW, my rig no longer has the UAD in it but the GeForce cards have been
>completely hassle free. If you'd like, let me know and next time I fire
up
>the rig I'll look to see which nVidia cards are in there. All my G450's
died
>years ago and I found out that they weren't nearly as snappy and troublefree
>as the ones I have now. YMMV.
>
>AA
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:4819c9e3$1@linux...
>>
>> I was reading some tech info on the UAD websight last night and noticed
>> this.
>> "Matrox G4xx graphics cards users will experience distortion in Audio
>> Export/Processing
>> results if UAD plugin windows are open during processing.
>> Workaround: Close all UAD plugin interface windows before performing Audio
>> Export/Processing."
>>
>> I've been using a Matrox G450 forever, and don't notice distortion, but
>> there
>> are the usual clicks and occasional dropouts when using a UAD plug on
a
>> track
>> with edits. (yes, I'm using the drivers from windows, not the crap ones
>> from
>> matarox) I render the track, solve the problem. I was wondering though
if
>> it might be a good idea to switch to a different vid card to see if that
>> fixed the problem. If so what would you suggest?
>> I'm still running the Asus A7S333 mobo. I figure it wouldn't be too
>> expensive
>> to get something else and experiment.
>> Rod
>>
>
>Just thought y'all would want to know.
TCBIt's hot news !I was just pondering renaming the groups. We seem to have two active groups
now, so I was thinking...
(*) Rename the main group to Music Technology - EMUEnsoniqPARIS
(*) Rename the "General" group to "Paris Social Club - EMUEnsoniqPARIS"
....or something like that.
Or not. What do you guys think? Might help ensure that we stay on music stuff
on the main group, as well as encourage some more general social chit chat
on the other group.
That was my thinki
|
|
|
|
| Re: Who was our big time BeOS'er around here? [message #95893 is a reply to message #95889] |
Tue, 12 February 2008 12:15 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ng anyhow.
Cheers,
Kim.
Cheers,
Kim.Hi Rod,
I think the G450 issues might have been specific to certain combination of hardware not just being a G450 card.
Chris
Rod Lincoln wrote:
> Yeah, let me know what your using. Your still using the Asus mobo, right?
> Rod
> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>> FWIW, my rig no longer has the UAD in it but the GeForce cards have been
>
>> completely hassle free. If you'd like, let me know and next time I fire
> up
>> the rig I'll look to see which nVidia cards are in there. All my G450's
> died
>> years ago and I found out that they weren't nearly as snappy and troublefree
>
>> as the ones I have now. YMMV.
>>
>> AA
>>
>> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:4819c9e3$1@linux...
>>> I was reading some tech info on the UAD websight last night and noticed
>
>>> this.
>>> "Matrox G4xx graphics cards users will experience distortion in Audio
>
>>> Export/Processing
>>> results if UAD plugin windows are open during processing.
>>> Workaround: Close all UAD plugin interface windows before performing Audio
>>> Export/Processing."
>>>
>>> I've been using a Matrox G450 forever, and don't notice distortion, but
>
>>> there
>>> are the usual clicks and occasional dropouts when using a UAD plug on
> a
>>> track
>>> with edits. (yes, I'm using the drivers from windows, not the crap ones
>
>>> from
>>> matarox) I render the track, solve the problem. I was wondering though
> if
>>> it might be a good idea to switch to a different vid card to see if that
>>> fixed the problem. If so what would you suggest?
>>> I'm still running the Asus A7S333 mobo. I figure it wouldn't be too
>>> expensive
>>> to get something else and experiment.
>>> Rod
>>>
>>
>
--
Chris Ludwig
ADK Pro Audio
(859) 635-5762
www.adkproaudio.com
chrisl@adkproaudio.comMusic Technology - EMUEnsoniqPARIS
Paris Social Club
Politics
Macs are the Greatest
Macs suck
Rip DeathwatchAmazing but true.
TCBNot that I would call that watered down potting soil they sell coffee...
David.
John wrote:
> It's hot news !This subject was originally posted by somebody else. This was an FYI on the
subject. So it's a Mac post and it's not music related even though SoundTrack
is part of FCP and several users here use FCP. Of course the usual smart
asses come out and run there mouths, and now we need to change the whole
news group?
What was that ridiculer, being ridiculed thing?
Ok guys
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>For those who had any question.
>
> http://www.macworld.co.uk/
|
|
|
|
| Re: Who was our big time BeOS'er around here? [message #95894 is a reply to message #95892] |
Tue, 12 February 2008 12:38 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
procreative/news/index.cfm?newsid= 21188The average daily posts now have to be down below 20. The only reason I still
look at the page is that I have it set up as a sort of RSS feed at work so
I can respond really easily. I can just delete it and leave y'all alone
as I'm not likely to EVER say anything on topic save the odd computer fix
that Chris Ludwig probably can do better than I can.
TCB
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>I was just pondering renaming the groups. We seem to have two active groups
>now, so I was thinking...
>
>(*) Rename the main group to Music Technology - EMUEnsoniqPARIS
>
>(*) Rename the "General" group to "Paris Social Club - EMUEnsoniqPARIS"
>
>...or something like that.
>
>Or not. What do you guys think? Might help ensure that we stay on music
stuff
>on the main group, as well as encourage some more general social chit chat
>on the other group.
>
>That was my thinking anyhow.
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>
>Cheers,
>Kim."bunuel" <bunuel@conar.fr> wrote:
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>>On the contrary, Bill, I DO have a problem with him being an artist. I
don't
>>like to listen to CEOs sing or watch accountants dance or look at paintings
>>by politicians. There are plenty of well-informed commentators on current
>>affairs who specialize on that, if Tim wants to make a difference he should
>>volunteer.
>
>
>Your reasoning seems flawed on this. The comparison is botched, if you will
>forgive me. The question ought to be: Do you want to hear a CEO, not sing,
>but make political pronouncements? And the answer must be no, according
to
>you.
>
>Tim Robbins's occupation is irrelevant. He is an informed citizen and that's
>all the qualification he needs to make stating his views in public not only
>legitimate but essential.It may be opportunism, but so what? From your perspective,
>nobody apart from the professional politician ought to be taken seriously
>on matters of policy, not CEOs (does Michael Bloomberg pronounce on policy?),
>not editors/writers(the Kristols, Buckley, et al), not military people,
nor
>economists, religionists, nor ordinary people of any stripe. There is a
streak
>of tory paternalism in this that is anti democratic to its core: governing
>is the province of the elite alone. It's vintage Duke of Wellington.
>
>By this logic, in fact, your OWN amateur pronouncements on politics must
>be considered utterly without merit. Yet, if you had Tim Robbins's platform,
>considering how strongly held and sophisticated your viewpoint is, and how
>avidly you promote it even to this tiny audience here, would you decline
>such an opportunity to promote it to the world at large? I can't see it,
>and I wouldn't fault you. Do you feel that Tim Robbins is less politically
>sophisticated than yourself?
>
>
>
>Venceremos!
>bunuel
>
>
>
>
HOW DARE YOU SAY THAD'S REASONING IS FLAWED! HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT ANYTHING
THE GREAT AND ALL KNOWING THAD HAS SAID IS BOTCHED! THE ALL KNOWING THAD
IS SUPERIOR TO YOU. WHAT EVERY THE GREAT THAD SAYS IS FACT. YOU SHOULD
NEVER QUESTION THE ALL KNOWING THAD, HE KNOWS MORE THAN ANYBODY ON THIS NEWS
GROUP, HE KNOWS MORE THAN ANYBODY ON THIS PLANET. YOU SHOULD SUCK UP TO
HIS SUPERIOR INTELLIGENCE.
HOW DARE YOU SAY THAD IS AN AMATEUR!!! THE GREAT THAD IS AN EXPERT AT EVERYTHING!!!!!!!
DON'T FORGET IT!!!
DO NOT QUESTION THE GREAT AND ALL KNOWING THAD ON POLITICS, HE IS AN EXPERT!
THAD KNOWS EVERYTHING ABOUT AMERICAN HISTORY AND POLITICS, HE IS NOT TO
BE QUESTIONED! WHERE DO YOU GET OFF COMPARING ANYONE TO THE GREAT, ALL
MIGHTY AND POLITICALLY SOPHISTICATED THAD, HE IS SUPERIOR TO ALL!
WHEN IT COMES TO ALL SUBJECTS THAD IS SUPERIOR TO YOU, KNOWS MORE THAN YOU
AND DON'T FORGET IT!
ALL SHOULD BOW DOWN AND WORSHIP THE GREAT, THE ALMIGHTY, ALL KNOWING THAD!!!!!
THAD IS THE KNOW IT ALL OF THE NEWS GROUP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
| Re: Who was our big time BeOS'er around here? [message #95896 is a reply to message #95893] |
Tue, 12 February 2008 11:53 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
either quit the sponge
>monkeys or stop talking about god, the founding fathers, and systems architecture.
> If you still reserve the right to make music, be passionate about religion/sociology,
>history, and IT, then you've just shot your own argument in the ass. By
>your own admission, you are not an expert in all (if any) of these fields.
>
>And for my next obiter dictum, since when does one need to be an expert
to
>make a valid observation or have a good idea? That's rather elitist, no?
>
>NB
>
HOW DARE YOU SAY THAD'S LOGIC IS FLAWED! HOW DARE YOU MENTION THE WORD LOGIC
IN THE PRESENCE OF THE ALMIGHTY, ALL KNOWING THAD! LOGIC IS AN APPLE PRODUCT,
LOGIC IS INFERIOR TO ANYTHING THAD HAS WRITTEN A PICTURE BOOK ABOUT!!! DON'T
YOU FORGET HIS BOOKS HAVE AT LEAST NINETY THOUSAND WORDS TOO! THE ALL GREAT,
AND MIGHTY THAD IS A LEGEND!
HOW DARE YOU SAY THAD IS NOT AN EXPERT!!!!! THAD IS AN EXPERT ON EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AND DON'T FORGET IT!!!!!!!! THADS THINKING IS SUPERIOR TO YOUR INFERIOR
THINKING, YOU PEA BRAIN! YOU SHOULD NEVER QUESTION THE GREAT AND ALMIGHTY
THAD!!!
ELITIST, ELITIST? HOW DARE YOU CALL THAD ELITIST? THAD IS THE ALL GREAT,
ALL KNOWING ELITIST TO YOU MR.!!!
ALL YOU NEOPHYTES SHOULD SUCK UP TO THE ALL KNOWING THAD!!!! HE IS THE GREAT
AND ALL KNOWING INTELLECTUAL AND IS SUPERIOR TO ALL OF YOU, JUST ASK HIM!
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>>I don't think my logic is flawed. It's very difficult for one human being
>>to become an expert in one field, much less two or three. I know, as I
have
>>failed at a half dozen. Would you listen to Tim Robbins' opinions about
>maritime
>>archeology? Habermas? Cambodian architecture? Politics is as difficult
to
>>master as those, but somehow because someone is a good actor we are supposed
>>to take their opinions seriously.
>>
>>This all stems, in my opinion, in the greatly overstated role that 'artists'
>>played in various movements of the baby boomer's youth.
>>
>>TCB
>>
>>"bunuel" <bunuel@conar.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>On the contrary, Bill, I DO have a problem with him being an artist.
I
>>don't
>>>>like to listen to CEOs sing or watch accountants dance or look at paintings
>>>>by politicians. There are plenty of well-informed commentators on current
>>>>affairs who specialize on that, if Tim wants to make a difference he
should
>>>>volunteer.
>>>
>>>
>>>Your reasoning seems flawed on this. The comparison is botched, if you
>will
>>>forgive me. The question ought to be: Do you want to hear a CEO, not sing,
>>>but make political pronouncements? And the answer must be no, according
>>to
>>>you.
>>>
>>>Tim Robbins's occupation is irrelevant. He is an informed citizen and
that's
>>>all the qualification he needs to make stating his views in public not
>only
>>>legitimate but essential.It may be opportunism, but so what? From your
>perspective,
>>>nobody apart from the professional politician ought to be taken seriously
>>>on matters of policy, not CEOs (does Michael Bloomberg pronounce on policy?),
>>>not editors/writers(the Kristols, Buckley, et al), not military people,
>>nor
>>>economists, religionists, nor ordinary people of any stripe. There is
a
>>streak
>>>of tory paternalism in this that is anti democratic to its core: governing
>>>is the province of the elite alone. It's vintage Duke of Wellington.
>>>
>>>By this logic, in fact, your OWN amateur pronouncements on politics must
>>>be considered utterly without merit. Yet, if you had Tim Robbins's platform,
>>>considering how strongly held and sophisticated your viewpoint is, and
>how
>>>avidly you promote it even to this tiny audience here, would you decline
>>>such an opportunity to promote it to the world at large? I can't see
it,
>>>and I wouldn't fault you. Do you feel that Tim Robbins is less politica
|
|
|
|
| Re: Who was our big time BeOS'er around here? [message #95902 is a reply to message #95886] |
Tue, 12 February 2008 21:09 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
accountants dance or look at paintings
>>>by politicians. There are plenty of well-informed commentators on current
>>>affairs who specialize on that, if Tim wants to make a difference he should
>>>volunteer.
>>
>>
>>Your reasoning seems flawed on this. The comparison is botched, if you
will
>>forgive me. The question ought to be: Do you want to hear a CEO, not sing,
>>but make political pronouncements? And the answer must be no, according
>to
>>you.
>>
>>Tim Robbins's occupation is irrelevant. He is an informed citizen and that's
>>all the qualification he needs to make stating his views in public not
only
>>legitimate but essential.It may be opportunism, but so what? From your
perspective,
>>nobody apart from the professional politician ought to be taken seriously
>>on matters of policy, not CEOs (does Michael Bloomberg pronounce on policy?),
>>not editors/writers(the Kristols, Buckley, et al), not military people,
>nor
>>economists, religionists, nor ordinary people of any stripe. There is a
>streak
>>of tory paternalism in this that is anti democratic to its core: governing
>>is the province of the elite alone. It's vintage Duke of Wellington.
>>
>>By this logic, in fact, your OWN amateur pronouncements on politics must
>>be considered utterly without merit. Yet, if you had Tim Robbins's platform,
>>considering how strongly held and sophisticated your viewpoint is, and
how
>>avidly you promote it even to this tiny audience here, would you decline
>>such an opportunity to promote it to the world at large? I can't see it,
>>and I wouldn't fault you. Do you feel that Tim Robbins is less politically
>>sophisticated than yourself?
>>
>>
>>
>>Venceremos!
>>bunuel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>HOW DARE YOU SAY THAD'S REASONING IS FLAWED! HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT ANYTHING
>THE GREAT AND ALL KNOWING THAD HAS SAID IS BOTCHED! THE ALL KNOWING THAD
>IS SUPERIOR TO YOU. WHAT EVERY THE GREAT THAD SAYS IS FACT. YOU SHOULD
>NEVER QUESTION THE ALL KNOWING THAD, HE KNOWS MORE THAN ANYBODY ON THIS
NEWS
>GROUP, HE KNOWS MORE THAN ANYBODY ON THIS PLANET. YOU SHOULD SUCK UP TO
>HIS SUPERIOR INTELLIGENCE.
>
>HOW DARE YOU SAY THAD IS AN AMATEUR!!! THE GREAT THAD IS AN EXPERT AT EVERYTHING!!!!!!!
> DON'T FORGET IT!!!
>
>DO NOT QUESTION TH
|
|
|
|
| Re: Who was our big time BeOS'er around here? [message #95905 is a reply to message #95886] |
Wed, 13 February 2008 02:43 |
Martin Harrington
Messages: 560
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>>Your reasoning seems flawed on this. The comparison is botched, if you
>will
>>>forgive me. The question ought to be: Do you want to hear a CEO, not sing,
>>>but make political pronouncements? And the answer must be no, according
>>to
>>>you.
>>>
>>>Tim Robbins's occupation is irrelevant. He is an informed citizen and
that's
>>>all the qualification he needs to make stating his views in public not
>only
>>>legitimate but essential.It may be opportunism, but so what? From your
>perspective,
>>>nobody apart from the professional politician ought to be taken seriously
>>>on matters of policy, not CEOs (does Michael Bloomberg pronounce on policy?),
>>>not editors/writers(the Kristols, Buckley, et al), not military people,
>>nor
>>>economists, religionists, nor ordinary people of any stripe. There is
a
>>streak
>>>of tory paternalism in this that is anti democratic to its core: governing
>>>is the province of the elite alone. It's vintage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon May 11 06:38:49 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.26939 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
