Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » To Air is Human
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94729 is a reply to message #94728] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 11:41   |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
elsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Why don't you start a new thread and we can throw down there?
>>
>>"yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Why do yoy think that your opinion is the right one? Are you saying that
>>this
>>>country
>>>was'nt built on the backs of slavery? How am I a hypocrite? Ask questions?
>>>My
>>>first post was nothing but questions. Having the guts to stand up for
>>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any
>pansy,
>>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes". are serious?
>>>Why did it take so long for every man to have the right same rights? Is'nt
>>>that something we were suppose to believe in? Honor? respect? Look,do'nt
>>>get
>>>made at me or anyone that confronts you with the truth. I love this country
>>>just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we
>>>have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are problems.(not
>>>to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want about
>my
>>>credibility,my words can stand on there own! This makes them no less true
>>>
>>>"Dedric Terry" <dt@noreply.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Before you pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become a
>hypocrit
>>>>yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually understand
>>>>other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into
>left
>>>>field.
>>>>
>>>>This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off a
diatribe
>>>>on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto.
>>>>
>>>>And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand up
for
>>>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any
>>pansy,
>>>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes.
>>>>
>>>>Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys
>>>any
>>>>credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument in
spades.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Listen,
>>>>&g
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94731 is a reply to message #94729] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 12:11 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;>
>>>>>>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim?
>>>>>
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> KKK?
>>>>>>> self-righteousness!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the
>>other
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of
>>Islam
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some
>schools.
>>>>>>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They
>>>are
>>>>>>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community
>>>>>>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries
>-
>>>two
>>>>>>>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In
>>effect,
>>>>>>>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in
>>return
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture,
>just
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>give
>>>>>>>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist
>>>>>>>>protests.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the
>>>US
>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>veil
>>>>>>>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those
>>>>very
>>>>>>>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism.
>>>>>>>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one
>>>case
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite
>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>what is the fabric of our country.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>DT
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity"
>>>>>>>><noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Isn't this cute?
>>>>>>>>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants
>better
>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>> I do:
>>>>>>>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This
wasn't
>>>>>>>>> necessar
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94732 is a reply to message #94731] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 12:31 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
y. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy
>>>>>and
>>>>>>> tie
>>>>>>>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about
here
>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>> elsewhere for years:
>>>>>>>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so
>>>>>>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political
>>>
>>>>>>>>> strategy
>>>>>>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they
>>>>>>>>> have--wittingly
>>>>>>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very
>>enemy
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for
>>>those
>>>>>>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice"
>and
>>>>>all.
>>>>>>>>> They really support the troops .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and
>
>>>>>>>>> encourage
>>>>>>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> homicidal
>>>>>>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof
>>>>of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> effectiveness of their strategy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated
>>>>and
>>>>>>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the
ones
>>>>>who
>>>>>>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing
>to
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> protect
>>>>>>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist
>American
>>>>>>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to
>this
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> country
>>>>>>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping
>>them
>>>>>>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect
>>>>>by
>>>>>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists
>>>>>are
>>>>>>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late,
they
>>>>>can
>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation
between
>>>>>>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads.
>>>>>I
>>>>>>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny,
>I
>>>didn't
>>>>>>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> bye.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>James, what is the race thing?Really? What is the race thing. ?? I think you
come in here daily, I might add, with your right-winged off the wall, bull-shit
,rhetoric...Please stop posting such BS!@# and doe yourself a favor a nd
study up on REAL AMERICAN HISTORY, not that Bull-shit you think you now and
was taught in school...
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"yah"
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94734 is a reply to message #94730] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 14:26 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ery? How am I a hypocrite? Ask questions?
>>>>>My
>>>>>first post was nothing but questions. Having the guts to stand up for
>>>>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any
>>>pansy,
>>>>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes". are serious?
>>>>>Why did it take so long for every man to have the right same rights?
>Is'nt
>>>>>that something we were suppose to believe in? Honor? respect? Look,do'nt
>>>>>get
>>>>>made at me or anyone that confronts you with the truth. I love this
country
>>>>>just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we
>>>>>have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are problems.(not
>>>>>to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want about
>>>my
>>>>>credibility,my words can stand on there own! This makes them no less
>true
>>>>>
>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dt@noreply.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Before you pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become
>a
>>>hypocrit
>>>>>>yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually
understand
>>>>>>other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into
>>>left
>>>>>>field.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off
a
>>diatribe
>>>>>>on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand up
>>for
>>>>>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without
any
>>>>pansy,
>>>>>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys
>>>>>any
>>>>>>credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument in
>>spades.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Yah" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94736 is a reply to message #94732] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 13:21 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The truth is almost all the founding fathers were
slave
>>>>>>owners,and
>>>>>>>some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing
>>>I
>>>>>agree
>>>>>>>on
>>>>>>>with you is that this place has gone way down!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>propaganda as this
>>>>>>>>(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical
>>>>>islam,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>not slavery. Simply amazing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough
of
>>>these
>>>>>>>>far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation?
racisim?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> KKK?
>>>>>>>>> self-righteousness!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency,
the
>>>>other
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims
>of
>>>>Islam
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some
>>>schools.
>>>>>>>>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens.
They
>>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that
community
>>>>>>>>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries
>>>-
>>>>>two
>>>>>>>>>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen).
>In
>>>>effect,
>>>>>>>>>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing
>in
>>>>return
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture,
>>>just
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>give
>>>>>>>>>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist
>>>>>>>>>>protests.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ -
>the
>>>>>US
>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>veil
>>>>>>>>>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up
those
>>>>>>very
>>>>>>>>>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism.
>>>>>>>>>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just
>one
>>>>>case
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite
>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>what is the fabric of our country.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>DT
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity"
>>>>>>>>>><noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't this cute?
>>>>>>>>>>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants
>>>better
>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>> I do:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This
>>wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy
>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>> tie
>>>>>>>>>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about
>>here
>>>&
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94738 is a reply to message #94737] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 14:56 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
roy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to
protect
>>>>>>>by
>>>>>>>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists
>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late,
>>they
>>>>>>>can
>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation
>>between
>>>>>>>>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their
>heads.
>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny,
>>>I
>>>>>didn't
>>>>>>>>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> bye.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>Sorry about they typos. I'm on my treo.
"LaMOnt" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>James, what is the race thing?Really? What is the race thing. ?? I think
you
>come in here daily, I might add, with your right-winged off the wall, bull-shit
>,rhetoric...Please stop posting such BS!@# and doe yourself a favor a nd
>study up on REAL AMERICAN HISTORY, not that Bull-shit you think you now
and
>was taught in school...
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>"yah" <blah@ya-ya.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I'm not Lamont.....Christ dying today could'nt get worse. I never understood
>>>how
>>>Christ dying was good,maybe it should have been Sad friday.
>>
>>Ok, LaMont usually goes off on the race thing, and he often has type-Os,
>>my mistake. As far as Christ dyeing on the cross, it is sad, it is also
>>something to be glad about and celebrate. If you under stood Christianity
>>you would understand that.
>>>
>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Do you really want to ruin Good Friday LaMont?
>>>>
>>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Why don't you start a new thread and we can throw down there?
>>>>>
>>>>>"yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why do yoy think that your opinion is the right one? Are you saying
>that
>>>>>this
>>>>>>country
>>>>>>was'nt built on the backs of slavery
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94743 is a reply to message #94738] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 14:05 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;>> of
>>>>>>>>> how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> what is the fabric of our country.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> DT
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity"
>>>>>>>>> <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Isn't this cute?
>>>>>>>>>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants
>> better
>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>> I do:
>>>>>>>>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This
> wasn't
>>>>>>>>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> tie
>>>>>>>>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about
> here
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere for years:
>>>>>>>>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so
>>>>>>>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political
>>>>>>>>>> strategy
>>>>>>>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they
>>>>>>>>>> have--wittingly
>>>>>>>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very
>>> enemy
>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for
>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice"
>> and
>>>>>> all.
>>>>>>>>>> They really support the troops .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and
>>>>>>>>>> encourage
>>>>>>>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their
>>>>>>>>>> homicidal
>>>>>>>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> effectiveness of their strategy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the
> ones
>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered
>>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willi
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94744 is a reply to message #94736] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 14:07 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ng
>> to
>>>>>>>>>> protect
>>>>>>>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist
>> American
>>>>>>>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to
>> this
>>>>>>>>>> country
>>>>>>>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping
>>> them
>>>>>>>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect
>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists
>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late,
> they
>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation
> between
>>>>>>>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny,
>> I
>>>> didn't
>>>>>>>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> bye.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>Ok, if you say so. So Mr. Yah, why don't you come out in to the open?
"LaMOnt" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>James, what is the race thing?Really? What is the race thing. ?? I think
you
>come in here daily, I might add, with your right-winged off the wall, bull-shit
>,rhetoric...Please stop posting such BS!@# and doe yourself a favor a nd
>study up on REAL AMERICAN HISTORY, not that Bull-shit you think you now
and
>was taught in school...
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>"yah" <blah@ya-ya.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I'm not Lamont.....Christ dying today could'nt get worse. I never understood
>>>how
>>>Christ dying was good,maybe it should have been Sad friday.
>>
>>Ok, LaMont usually goes off on the race thing, and he often has type-Os,
>>my mistake. As far as Christ dyeing on the cross, it is sad, it is also
>>something to be glad about and celebrate. If you under stood Christianity
>>you would understand that.
>>>
>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Do you really want to ruin Good Friday LaMont?
>>>>
>>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Why don't you start a new thread and we can throw down there?
>>>>>
>>>>>"yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why do yoy think that your opinion is the right one? Are you saying
>that
>>>>>this
>>>>>>country
>>>>>>was'nt built on the backs of slavery? How am I a hypocrite? Ask questions?
>>>>>>My
>>>>>>first post was nothing but questions. Having the guts to stand up for
>>>>>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without
any
>>>>pansy,
>>>>>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes". are serious?
>>>>>>Why did it take so long for every man to have the right same rights?
>>Is'nt
>>>>>>that something we were suppose to believe in? Honor? respect? Look,do'nt
>>>>>>get
>>>>>>made at me or anyone that confronts you with the truth. I love this
>country
>>>>>>just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we
>>>>>>have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are problems.(not
>>>>>>to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want about
>>>>my
>>>>>>credibility,my words can stand on there own! This makes them no less
>>true
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dt@noreply.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Before you pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become
>>a
>>>>hypocrit
>>>>>>>yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually
>understand
>>>>>>>other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into
>>>>left
>>>>>>>field.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off
>a
>>>diatribe
>>>>>>>on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand
up
>>>for
>>>>>>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without
>any
>>>>>pansy,
>>>>>>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys
>>>>>>any
>>>>>>>credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument
in
>>>spades.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Listen,
>>>>>>>>My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left.
>I
>>>just
>>>>>>>>find the statement "the fabric of are country" t
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94745 is a reply to message #94738] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 14:57 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
o be bullshit. We
>forget
>>>>>>>>about
>>>>>>>>are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness
>>>>>I
>>>>>>>speak
>>>>>>>>of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness
>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>>speak
>>>>>>>>of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt
>>>>>>>be
>>>>>>>>played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my
>comments
>>>>>>>>as detour
>>>>>>>>into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about
>>the
>>>>>>"fabric"
>>>>>>>>of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were
>slave
>>>>>>>owners,and
>>>>>>>>some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing
>>>>I
>>>>>>agree
>>>>>>>>on
>>>>>>>>with you is that this place has gone way down!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>propaganda as this
>>>>>>>>>(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical
>>>>>>islam,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>not slavery. Simply amazing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough
>of
>>>>these
>>>>>>>>>far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation?
>racisim?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> KKK?
>>>>>>>>>> self-righteousness!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency,
>the
>>>>>other
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims
>>of
>>>>>Islam
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some
>>>>schools.
>>>>>>>>>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens.
>They
>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that
>community
>>>>>>>>>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries
>>>>-
>>>>>>two
>>>>>>>>>>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen).
>
>>In
>>>>>effect,
>>>>>>>>>>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing
>>in
>>>>>return
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture,
>>>>just
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>give
>>>>>>>>>>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist
>>>>>>>>>>>protests.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94758 is a reply to message #94745] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 03:27 |
rick
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
enact all levels of retribution on others
>because we think that's what god would do.
>>
>>What concerns me is the reality of Jesus. From that issue flow all
>>others, and whether there is an objective truth here or we are
>>free to make it up as we go along.
>and whose to say where the "making up" began. it is in my nature to
>question what i see and hear and if i go to hell for it...then oh well
>it's who i am, the way i was made.
>>
>>DC
>>
>>
>>
>>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright
>>>ideas men come up with.
>>>sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had one language thing. just
>>>as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would
>>>partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's
>>>god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when
>>>populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went to
>>>the land of nod and eventually married...who...i don't
>>>know...mom...sis...cousin rita???
>>>i believe god was smart enough to create the laws of physics that
>>>allow certain things to happen under certain conditions and lets the
>>>chips fall where they may. to me god doesn't kill 250 people on a
>>>plane and spare one as a lesson of his devine intervention
>>>capabilities. he doesn't kill half a town yet spares a church so they
>>>have somewhere to mourn the dead.
>>>the truely (again to me) sad thing about the differing concepts of god
>>>is how their used to validate the harm we do each other.
>>>
>>>
>>>On 22 Mar 2008 00:13:36 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://ldolphin.org/babel.html
>>>
>If the global temperature raises with more than 2 degrees celcius, we'll
have a global disaster. It's no chance that we are going to avoid that. So
beware, the africans, the south asians and the south americans are coming to
knock on our door, and they are hungry, they are thirsty, and they are many.
And that's just the beginning. This thing is out of control.
Bjorn R
"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:47e41af0@linux...
> James McCloskey wrote:
> > The science is about money.
>
> To an extent everything is about money. But that doesn't stop people
> from doing good, conscientious work.
>
> You yourself require money to live. Should we therefore disbelieve
> everything you say?
>
> No, I don't think so. That argument is really reaching.
>
>
> > The science of man made global warming being
> > a major factor is bullshit, and it is not provable.
>
> LOL. The science is hardly bullshit.
>
> What scientists are saying is that there is a strong chance that human
> contributions to greenhouse gases are affecting the climate.
>
> This is because we are dumping large and increasing amounts of
> greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, above and beyond current natural
> cycles. Gases that then stay in the atmosphere for extended periods,
> decades or more.
>
> Keep in mind that greenhouse gases help regulate temperature on earth by
> reflecting back infrared radiation. This is a good thing for our
> survival but it can be overdone.
>
> Since only a tiny fraction of the gases in the atmosphere reflect
> infrared radiation (nitrogen and oxygen don't), it doesn't take much of
> an increase in greenhouse gases to noticeably change the amount of heat
> directed back toward the earth.
>
> There is strong evidence that this is what is happening now, and that
> our contributions are part of the problem. Based on what we know so far
> there is a strong chance this problem will increase over time.
>
> Given that information, it's smart to consider the implications now.
>
>
> > Has the earth heated
> > up a bit, yes, the earth goes threw changes.
>
> True, and true.
>
> And evidence indicates there's a good chance we're involved in the
> current climate change event.
>
>
> > Should we as people stop polluting,
> > yes.
>
> We certainly need to be aware of the chemistry around us and how we
> interact with it.
>
> The ozone situation is a good example. Scientists noticed a change in
> the ozone layer. A human chemical cause was discovered. Policies were
> changed to stop human contributions to the problem.
>
>
> > Should we conserve, yes, I'm a conservative, not a liberal.
&g
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94765 is a reply to message #94743] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 09:26 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
otmail.com" target="_blank">parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright
>>> ideas men come up with.
>>> sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had one language thing. just
>>> as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would
>>> partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's
>>> god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when
>>> populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went to
>>> the land of nod and eventually married...who...i don't
>>> know...mom...sis...cousin rita???
>>> i believe god was smart enough to create the laws of physics that
>>> allow certain things to happen under certain conditions and lets the
>>> chips fall where they may. to me god doesn't kill 250 people on a
>>> plane and spare one as a lesson of his devine intervention
>>> capabilities. he doesn't kill half a town yet spares a church so they
>>> have somewhere to mourn the dead.
>>> the truely (again to me) sad thing about the differing concepts of god
>>> is how their used to validate the harm we do each other.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22 Mar 2008 00:13:36 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://ldolphin.org/babel.html
>>First, I don't think it is only one party that will be on this taxation band
wagon, the bush's are trilateralist also, and others. "a thousand points
of light" " A new world order" That's trilateral talk.
Isn't it funny that China, the biggest polluter on the planet is exempt from
the law and rules the world gov. is trying to put in place. Why? This is
all part of the trilateralist plan to shift the money around. The world
banks have now set up inside of China.
They are trying to scare people in to a sin tax. It's about money, they
want a sin tax to build up the rest of the world. It's about controlling
the world economically. They want to restrict what america can build and
do in the future.
Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>James McCloskey wrote:
>> The science is about money.
>
>To an extent everything is about money. But that doesn't stop people
>from doing good, conscientious work.
>
>You yourself require money to live. Should we therefore disbelieve
>everything you say?
>
>No, I don't think so. That argument is really reaching.
>
>
> > The science of man made global warming being
>> a major factor is bullshit, and it is not provable.
>
>LOL. The science is hardly bullshit.
>
>What scientists are saying is that there is a strong chance that human
>contributions to greenhouse gases are affecting the climate.
>
>This is because we are dumping large and increasing amounts of
>greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, above and beyond current natural
>cycles. Gases that then stay in the atmosphere for extended periods,
>decades or more.
>
>Keep in mind that greenhouse gases help regulate temperature on earth by
>reflecting back infrared radiation. This is a good thing for our
>survival but it can be overdone.
>
>Since only a tiny fraction of the gases in the atmosphere reflect
>infrared radiation (nitrogen and oxygen don't), it doesn't take much of
>an increase in greenhouse gases to noticeably change the amount of heat
>directed back toward the earth.
>
>There is strong evidence that this is what is happening now, and that
>our contributions are part of the problem. Based on what we know so far
>there is a strong chance this problem will increase over time.
>
>Given that information, it's smart to consider the implications now.
>
>
>> Has the earth heated
>> up a bit, yes, the earth goes threw changes.
>
>True, and true.
>
>And evidence indicates there's a good chance we're involved in the
>current climate change event.
>
>
>> Should we as people stop polluting,
>> yes.
>
>We certainly need to be aware of the chemistry around us and how we
>interact with it.
>
>The ozone situation is a good example. Scientists noticed a change in
>the ozone layer. A human chemical cause was discovered. Policies were
>changed to stop human contributions to the problem.
>
>
>> Should we conserve, yes, I'm a conservative, not a liberal.
>
>Great.
>
>To conserve what we have we need to take into account any evidence that
>shows we may have a problem.
>
>BTW climate change and conservation are not a partisan issues, in my
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94767 is a reply to message #94765] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 09:47 |
Ted Gerber
Messages: 705
Registered: January 2009
|
Senior Member |
|
|
lusions.
>
>
> > I'm I buying in the this trilateralist
>> plan to shift more money out of the USA, no way!
>
>That's fine. But again you can promote your political views without
>attacking climate scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
>
>
>> Back in the 70's, the scientist
>> that started this global warming stuff, was predicting that we would be
in
>> an ice age right now.
>
>Who are you talking about?
>
>
>> You can post all of the contrived research you, it won't change the truth.
>> Choose to believe what you want, man made global warming has not been
proven.
>
>If someone is exploiting scientific data in a partisan way to push a
>certain point of view you happen to disagree with, then fine, argue with
>them.
>
>But don't pretend the data itself doesn't exist. There is a lot of
>peer-reviewed research out there, and it isn't "contrived."
>
>If the only way to "prove" your point is to continue a risky worldwide
>experiment until we possibly screw up the planet for future generations,
>then your proof is too late to be in any way useful.
>
>It's much smarter to look at the decades of evidence we already have and
>make prudent risk management decisions.
>
>Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>
>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>> Wish it were that easy, James. We would be poor stewards of the land
>>> indeed if we carelessly dismissed the evidence to date. It's not
>>> particularly prudent to ignore increasing evidence that shows possible
>>> problems.
>>>
>>> The atmosphere and our use of it to store increasing amounts of unwanted
>>
>>> greenhouse gases is a big enough subject scientifically without being
>>> sidetracked by political and economic conspiracy theories.
>>>
>>> Even if you enjoy discussing perceived conspiracies, be sure you don't
>>> confuse them with the ongoing science.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Jamie
>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>
>>>
>>> James McCloskey wrote:
>>>> What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of crap.
>>
>>>>
>>>> "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>> The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax
raises
>>>>> won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that..
>>>>> BR
>>>>>
>>>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:47e2cfc2$1@linux...
>>>>>> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets for
>> ten
>>>>> cents
>>>>>> and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making bullshit!
>>>>>> Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are going to try to
>> make
>>>>>> it a sin tax that we will all have to pay. You know once the government
>>>>>> gets a tax passed through they will never repeal it. We will be paying
>>>> it
>>>>>> for then on! It's a scare tactic to cow the people in to believing
>> this
>>>>>> bunch of bullshit. There is no significant man made global warming,
>> it's
>>>>>> a lie to shift the wealth out of the United States while these rats
>> and
>>>>> their
>>>>>> friends get wealthy doing it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.h
>>>>> tml
>>>>>>> This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a while.
>>>>> More
>>>>>>> hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just
been
>>>>>>> insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it preparing
>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as gas
>> usage
>>>>>>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas generates
>>>> is
>>>>>>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall, we're
>>>>> going
>>>>>>> to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking
about
>>>>>>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the American
>>>>>>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to go
>>>>> elsewhere
>>>>>>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gimme some of that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>There has always been global disasters.
"BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>If the global temperature raises with more than 2 degrees celcius, we'll
>have a global disaster. It's no chance that we are going to avoid th
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94768 is a reply to message #94767] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 09:48 |
Ted Gerber
Messages: 705
Registered: January 2009
|
Senior Member |
|
|
at.
So
>beware, the africans, the south asians and the south americans are coming
to
>knock on our door, and they are hungry, they are thirsty, and they are many.
>And that's just the beginning. This thing is out of control.
>
>Bjorn R
>
>"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:47e41af0@linux...
>> James McCloskey wrote:
>> > The science is about money.
>>
>> To an extent everything is about money. But that doesn't stop people
>> from doing good, conscientious work.
>>
>> You yourself require money to live. Should we therefore disbelieve
>> everything you say?
>>
>> No, I don't think so. That argument is really reaching.
>>
>>
>> > The science of man made global warming being
>> > a major factor is bullshit, and it is not provable.
>>
>> LOL. The science is hardly bullshit.
>>
>> What scientists are saying is that there is a strong chance that human
>> contributions to greenhouse gases are affecting the climate.
>>
>> This is because we are dumping large and increasing amounts of
>> greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, above and beyond current natural
>> cycles. Gases that then stay in the atmosphere for extended periods,
>> decades or more.
>>
>> Keep in mind that greenhouse gases help regulate temperature on earth
by
>> reflecting back infrared radiation. This is a good thing for our
>> survival but it can be overdone.
>>
>> Since only a tiny fraction of the gases in the atmosphere reflect
>> infrared radiation (nitrogen and oxygen don't), it doesn't take much of
>> an increase in greenhouse gases to noticeably change the amount of heat
>> directed back toward the earth.
>>
>> There is strong evidence that this is what is happening now, and that
>> our contributions are part of the problem. Based on what we know so far
>> there is a strong chance this problem will increase over time.
>>
>> Given that information, it's smart to consider the implications now.
>>
>>
>> > Has the earth heated
>> > up a bit, yes, the earth goes threw changes.
>>
>> True, and true.
>>
>> And evidence indicates there's a good chance we're involved in the
>> current climate change event.
>>
>>
>> > Should we as people stop polluting,
>> > yes.
>>
>> We certainly need to be aware of the chemistry around us and how we
>> interact with it.
>>
>> The ozone situation is a good example. Scientists noticed a change in
>> the ozone layer. A human chemical cause was discovered. Policies were
>> changed to stop human contributions to the problem.
>>
>>
>> > Should we conserve, yes, I'm a conservative, not a liberal.
>>
>> Great.
>>
>> To conserve what we have we need to take into account any evidence that
>> shows we may have a problem.
>>
>> BTW climate change and conservation are not a partisan issues, in my
>> view. At the very least, most people don't want to screw up the area
>> where they live, no matter their politics.
>>
>>
>> > Am I buying
>> > in to the liberal's sin tax plan their trying to convince the dummies
to
>> > start paying to save the world, NO WAY!
>>
>> That's fine. But don't confuse any perceived conspiracies with ongoing
>> climate science.
>>
>> You can promote your political views without attacking climate
>> scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
>>
>>
>> > I'm I buying in the this trilateralist
>> > plan to shift more money out of the USA, no way!
>>
>> That's fine. But again you can promote your political views without
>> attacking climate scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
>>
>>
>> > Back in the 70's, the scientist
>> > that started this global warming stuff, was predicting that we would
be
>in
>> > an ice age right now.
>>
>> Who are you talking about?
>>
>>
>> > You can post all of the contrived research you, it won't change the
>truth.
>> > Choose to believe what you want, man made global warming has not been
>proven.
>>
>> If someone is exploiting scientific data in a partisan way to push a
>> certain point of view you happen to disagree with, then fine, argue with
>> them.
>>
>> But don't pretend the data itself doesn't exist. There is a lot of
>> peer-reviewed research out there, and it isn't "contrived."
>>
>> If the only way to "prove" your point is to continue a risky worldwide
>> experiment until we possibly screw up the planet for future generations,
>> then your proof is too late to be in any way useful.
>>
>> It's much smarter to look at the decades of evidence we already have and
>> make prudent risk management decisions.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Jamie
>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>>
>>
>> > Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>> >> Wish it were that easy, James. We would be poor stewards of the land
>> >> indeed if we carelessly dismissed the evidence to date. It's not
>> >> particularly prudent to ignore increasing evidence that shows possible
>> >> problems.
>> >>
>> >> The atmosphere and our use of it to store increasing amounts of
>unwanted
>> >
>> >> greenhouse gases is a big enough subject scientifically without being
>> >> sidetracked by political and economic conspiracy theories.
>> >>
>> >> Even if you enjoy discussing perceived conspiracies, be sure you don't
>> >> confuse them with the ongoing science.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> -Jamie
>> >> www.JamieKrutz.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> James McCloskey wrote:
>> >>> What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of
>crap.
>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> "BR" <
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94769 is a reply to message #94768] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 10:13 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
f="mailto:nospam@nospam.com" target="_blank">nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >>>> The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax
>raises
>> >>>> won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that..
>> >>>> BR
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>>> news:47e2cfc2$1@linux...
>> >>>>> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets
for
>> > ten
>> >>>> cents
>> >>>>> and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making
>bullshit!
>> >>>>> Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are going to try
to
>> > make
>> >>>>> it a sin tax that we will all have to pay. You know once the
>government
>> >>>>> gets a tax passed through they will never repeal it. We will be
>paying
>> >>> it
>> >>>>> for then on! It's a scare tactic to cow the people in to believing
>> > this
>> >>>>> bunch of bullshit. There is no significant man made global warming,
>> > it's
>> >>>>> a lie to shift the wealth out of the United States while these rats
>> > and
>> >>>> their
>> >>>>> friends get wealthy doing it.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
> http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.h
>> >>>> tml
>> >>>>>> This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a
>while.
>> >>>> More
>> >>>>>> hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just
>been
>> >>>>>> insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it
>preparing
>> >>>>> you
>> >>>>>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as
gas
>> > usage
>> >>>>>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas
>generates
>> >>> is
>> >>>>>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall,
>we're
>> >>>> going
>> >>>>>> to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking
>about
>> >>>>>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the
>American
>> >>>>>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to
go
>> >>>> elsewhere
>> >>>>>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Gimme some of that.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >
>
>man has always spoken in metaphoric, allegoric and or euphemistic
terms...except biblicly. ya know steve i don't profess to be right
because i just don't know but it seems there are a lot of people so
willing to tell me how wrong i am when they're no different than me.
On 22 Mar 2008 06:51:06 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net>
wrote:
>
>Oh, forgot one important thing.... It wasn't men who came up with the "bright
>idea" to confuse the language, it was Gods.
>BUT it was mans idea to attempt to build the tower and according to what
>the Word is all about, they would have succeded if God hadn't interviened
>with the language confusion.
>
>"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>
>>Rick, I HIGHLY reccomend you crack the book open and read the text for yourself.
>>You keep coming up with all these goofy things about a tree being a tree
>>and swinging a cat around... Man... that's all just foolishness. Please,
>>read it first-THEN bring on the comments. Right now all you are doing is
>>"babelling" about something you don't know anything about. Read the text....
>>It WAS all about all the Babylonians speaking Babalonian. Not a hard concept
>>to understand. God wanted to break their power of agreement so he confused
>>the language and no-one understood each other and the progress of the tower
>>seeced. Why are you fighting such a simple, well known, taught to millions,
>>established story? You are fortunate that there are (just assuming guys)a
>>handful of Believers on this Forum who (you may as well face it) won't back
>>down from the Truth?
>>
>>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright
>>>ideas men come up with.
>>>sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had one language thing. just
>>>as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would
>>>partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's
>>>god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when
>>>populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went to
>>>the land of nod and eventually married...who...i don't
>>>know...mom...sis...cousin rita???
>>>i believe god was smart enough to create the laws of physics that
>>>allow certain things to happen under certain conditions and lets the
>>>chips fall where they may. to me god doesn't kill 250 people on a
>>>plane and spare one as a lesson of his devine intervention
>>>capabilities. he doesn't kill half a town yet spares a church so they
>>>have somewhere to mourn the dead.
>>>the truely (again to me) sad thing about the differing concepts of god
>>>is how their used to validate the harm we do each other.
>>>
>>>
>>>On 22 Mar 2008 00:13:36 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://ldolphin.org/babel.html
>>>
>>Point was, you simply launched a diatribe about slavery based on one word
that had nothing, and I repeat, *nothing* to do with slavery. How about
a game of word association, I say, "orange" you say slavery. I say balloon,
you say "slavery". Get the picture yet?
If you want to start a thread about how the word "fabric" offends you, feel
free, but don't pass judgement and make assumptions about my intent in my
reply to DJ. I wasn't talking to you, about you, or for your benefit, whoever
you are.
And I find it extraordinarily offensive that you would assume you have the
right to cry about injustices done to other people over 150 years ago, and
extrapolate that to being a permanent stigma doo
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94770 is a reply to message #94769] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 10:47 |
Ted Gerber
Messages: 705
Registered: January 2009
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ming our country, and woven
into every conversation from here to eternity. I won't bother to explain
"fabric" to you since you didn't get it last time.
If you want to play the game of associating yourself with the past for sake
of playing victim, I'm part American Indian (direct descendant), and "we"
were here first, and the first to lose rights and freedoms here. ;-) If
you want to associate history with present day people, why not claim Germany
is racist and doomed because of Hitler's genocidal mania? How about the
Netherlands for the barbarians?
Enough of this. I only came back to be clear about how diluded you are in
your assumptions in this debate. It used to be fun to hang out here and
exchange opinions, however diverse, but this tangent really takes the cake
- must be the twilight zone now. I guess now you'll rant about how "cake"
or the word "twilight" is a "bull***" word as a result of slavery by some
twisted and bizarre association as well. Have fun.
"yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote:
>
>Why do yoy think that your opinion is the right one? Are you saying that
this
>country
>was'nt built on the backs of slavery? How am I a hypocrite? Ask questions?
>My
>first post was nothing but questions. Having the guts to stand up for
>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any pansy,
>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes". are serious?
>Why did it take so long for every man to have the right same rights? Is'nt
>that something we were suppose to believe in? Honor? respect? Look,do'nt
>get
>made at me or anyone that confronts you with the truth. I love this country
>just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we
>have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are problems.(not
>to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want about my
>credibility,my words can stand on there own! This makes them no less true
>
>"Dedric Terry" <dt@noreply.com> wrote:
>>
>>Before you pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become a hypocrit
>>yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually understand
>>other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into left
>>field.
>>
>>This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off a diatribe
>>on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto.
>>
>>And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand up for
>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any
pansy,
>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes.
>>
>>Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys
>any
>>credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument in spades.
>>
>>
>>
>>"Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Listen,
>>>My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. I just
>>>find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We forget
>>>about
>>>are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness
I
>>speak
>>>of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness
>I
>>>speak
>>>of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt
>>be
>>>played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my comments
>>>as detour
>>>into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about the
>"fabric"
>>>of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were slave
>>owners,and
>>>some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing I
>agree
>>>on
>>>with you is that this place has gone way down!
>>>
>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist
>
>>>>propaganda as this
>>>>(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical
>islam,
>>>
>>>>not slavery. Simply amazing.
>>>>
>>>>This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough of these
>>>>far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field.
>>>>
>>>>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim?
>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>> KKK?
>>>>> self-righteousness!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the
other
>>>>> a
>>>>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of
Islam
>>>>> -
>>>>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools.
>>>>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They
>are
>>>>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community
>>>>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries -
>two
>>>>>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In
effect,
>>>>>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in
return
>>>>> -
>>>>>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, just
>>>
>>>>>>give
>>>>>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist
>>>>>>protests.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the
>US
>>>is
>>>>>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing
>>>
>>>>>>veil
>>>>>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those
>>very
>>>>>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism.
>>>>>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one
>case
>>>>> of
>>>>>>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite
>>>of
>>>>>>what is the fabric of our country.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>DT
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity"
>>>>>><noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Isn't this cute?
>>>>>>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants better
>>>>> than
>>>>>>> I do:
>>>>>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This wasn't
>>>>>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy
>>>and
>>>>> tie
>>>>>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here
>>>and
>>>>>>> elsewhere for years:
>>>>>>> The Democrats and their g
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94771 is a reply to message #94765] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 09:42 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
lorious leaders, who have become so
>>>>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political
>
>>>>>>> strategy
>>>>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they
>>>>>>> have--wittingly
>>>>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very
enemy
>>>>> they
>>>>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for
>those
>>>>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and
>>>all.
>>>>>>> They really support the troops .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility
>>>>> for
>>>>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and
>>>>>>> encourage
>>>>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their
>>
>>>>>>> homicidal
>>>>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof
>>of
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> effectiveness of their strategy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated
>>and
>>>>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones
>>>who
>>>>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered
>>>
>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to
>>
>>>>>>> protect
>>>>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American
>>>>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this
>>>
>>>>>>> country
>>>>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping
them
>>>>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect
>>>by
>>>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists
>>>are
>>>>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they
>>>can
>>>>> then
>>>>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between
>>>>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads.
>>>I
>>>>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I
>didn't
>>>>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> bye.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>China is one of the countries that's going to suffer most from global
heating. In fact, they already do.
Bjorn R
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:47e42074$1@linux...
>
> First, I don't think it is only one party that will be on this taxation
band
> wagon, the bush's are trilateralist also, and others. "a thousand points
> of light" " A new world order" That's trilateral talk.
>
> Isn't it funny that China, the biggest polluter on the planet is exempt
from
> the law and rules the world gov. is trying to put in place. Why? This is
> all part of the trilateralist plan to shift the money around. The world
> banks have now set up inside of China.
>
> They are trying to scare people in to a sin tax. It's about money, they
> want a sin tax to build up the rest of the world. It's about controlling
> the world economically. They want to restrict what america can build and
> do in the future.
>
> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
> >James McCloskey wrote:
> >> The science is about money.
> >
> >To an extent everything is about money. But that doesn't stop people
> >from doing good, conscientious work.
> >
> >You yourself require money to live. Should we therefore disbelieve
> >everything you say?
> >
> >No, I don't think so. That argument is really reaching.
> >
> >
> > > The science of man made global warming being
> >> a major factor is bullshit, and it is not provable.
> >
> >LOL. The science is hardly bullshit.
> >
> >What scientists are saying is that there is a strong chance that human
> >contributions to greenhouse gases are affecting the climate.
> >
> >This is because we are dumping large and increasing amounts of
> >greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, above and beyond current natural
> >cycles. Gases that then stay in the atmosphere for extended periods,
> >decades or more.
> >
> >Keep in mind that greenhouse gases help regulate temperature on earth by
>
> >reflecting back infrared radiation. This is a good thing for our
> >survival but it can be overdone.
> >
> >Since only a tiny fraction of the gases in the atmosphere reflect
> >infrared radiation (nitrogen and oxygen don't), it doesn't take much of
>
> >an increase in greenhouse gases to noticeably change the amount of heat
>
> >directed back toward the earth.
> >
> >There is strong evidence that this is what is happening now, and that
> >our contributions are part of the problem. Based on what we know so far
>
> >there is a strong chance this problem will increase over time.
> >
> >Given that information, it's smart to consider the implications now.
> >
> >
> >> Has the earth heated
> >> up a bit, yes, the earth goes threw changes.
> >
> >True, and true.
> >
> >And evidence indicates there's a good chance we're involved in the
> >current climate change event.
> >
> >
> >> Should we as people stop polluting,
> >> yes.
> >
> >We certainly need to be aware of the chemistry around us and how we
> >interact
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94773 is a reply to message #94770] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 11:31 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
buying
> >> in to the liberal's sin tax plan their trying to convince the dummies
> to
> >> start paying to save the world, NO WAY!
> >
> >That's fine. But don't confuse any perceived conspiracies with ongoing
> >climate science.
> >
> >You can promote your political views without attacking climate
> >scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
> >
> >
> > > I'm I buying in the this trilateralist
> >> plan to shift more money out of the USA, no way!
> >
> >That's fine. But again you can promote your political views without
> >attacking climate scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
> >
> >
> >> Back in the 70's, the scientist
> >> that started this global warming stuff, was predicting that we would be
> in
> >> an ice age right now.
> >
> >Who are you talking about?
> >
> >
> >> You can post all of the contrived research you, it won't change the
truth.
> >> Choose to believe what you want, man made global warming has not been
> proven.
> >
> >If someone is exploiting scientific data in a partisan way to push a
> >certain point of view you happen to disagree with, then fine, argue with
>
> >them.
> >
> >But don't pretend the data itself doesn't exist. There is a lot of
> >peer-reviewed research out there, and it isn't "contrived."
> >
> >If the only way to "prove" your point is to continue a risky worldwide
> >experiment until we possibly screw up the planet for future generations,
>
> >then your proof is too late to be in any way useful.
> >
> >It's much smarter to look at the decades of evidence we already have and
>
> >make prudent risk management decisions.
> >
> >Cheers,
> > -Jamie
> > www.JamieKrutz.com
> >
> >
> >
> >> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
> >>> Wish it were that easy, James. We would be poor stewards of the land
>
> >>> indeed if we carelessly dismissed the evidence to date. It's not
> >>> particularly prudent to ignore increasing evidence that shows possible
>
> >>> problems.
> >>>
> >>> The atmosphere and our use of it to store increasing amounts of
unwanted
> >>
> >>> greenhouse gases is a big enough subject scientifically without being
>
> >>> sidetracked by political and economic conspiracy theories.
> >>>
> >>> Even if you enjoy discussing perceived conspiracies, be sure you don't
>
> >>> confuse them with the ongoing science.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> -Jamie
> >>> www.JamieKrutz.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> James McCloskey wrote:
> >>>> What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of
crap.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> >>>>> The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax
> raises
> >>>>> won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that..
> >>>>> BR
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>> news:47e2cfc2$1@linux...
> >>>>>> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets
for
> >> ten
> >>>>> cents
> >>>>>> and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making
bullshit!
> >>>>>> Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are going to try to
> >> make
> >>>>>> it a sin tax that we will all have to pay. You know once the
government
> >>>>>> gets a tax passed through they will never repeal it. We will be
paying
> >>>> it
> >>>>>> for then on! It's a scare tactic to cow the people in to believing
> >> this
> >>>>>> bunch of bullshit. There is no significant man made global
warming,
> >> it's
> >>>>>> a lie to shift the wealth out of the United States while these rats
> >> and
> >>>>> their
> >>>>>> friends get wealthy doing it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.h
> >>>>> tml
> >>>>>>> This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a
while.
> >>>>> More
> >>>>>>> hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just
> been
> >>>>>>> insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it
preparing
> >>>>>> you
> >>>>>>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as
gas
> >> usage
> >>>>>>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas
generates
> >>>> is
> >>>>>>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall,
we're
> >>>>> going
> >>>>>>> to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking
> about
> >>>>>>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the
American
> >>>>>>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to go
> >>>>> elsewhere
> >>>>>>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Gimme some of that.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>
>Whew!
hey everybody. let's take a break and cool down.Conspiracies are another matter.
Back to the science: Evidence shows the strong possibility that humans
contributions to greenhouse gases are currently affecting the climate.
If you suspect that some groups are trying to exploit this data for
nefarious purposes, then fine, take on those groups. Dig into whatever
conspiracies you want.
But don't pretend that the scientific data doesn't exist. You can
promote your political views without attacking climate scientists or
dismissing scientific conclusions.
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
James McCloskey wrote:
> First, I don't think it is only one party that will be on this taxation band
> wagon, the bush's are trilateralist also, and others. "a thousand points
> of light" " A new world order" That's trilateral talk.
>
> Isn't it funny that China, the biggest polluter on the planet is exempt from
> the law and rules the world gov. is trying to put in place. Why? This is
> all part of the trilateralist plan to shift the money around. The world
> banks have now set up inside of China.
>
> They are trying to scare people in to a sin tax. It's about money, they
> want a sin tax to build up the rest of the world. It's about controlling
> the world economically. They want to restrict what america can build and
> do in the future.
>
> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>> James McCloskey wrote:
>>> The science is about money.
>> To an extent everything is about money. But that doesn't stop people
>>from doing good, conscientious work.
>> You yourself require money to live. Should we therefore disbelieve
>> everything you say?
>>
>> No, I don't think so. That argument is really reaching.
>>
>>
>>> The science of man made global warming being
>>> a major factor is bullshit, and it is not provable.
>> LOL. The science is hardly bullshit.
>>
>> What scientists are saying is that there is a strong chance that human
>> contributions to greenhouse gases are affecting the climate.
>>
>> This is because we are dumping large and increasing amounts of
>> greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, above and beyond current natural
>> cycles. Gases that then stay in the atmosphere for extended periods,
>> decades or more.
>>
>> Keep in mind that greenhouse gases help regulate temperature on earth by
>
>> reflecting back infrared radiation. This is a good thing for our
>> survival but it can be overdone.
>>
>> Since only a tiny fraction of the gases in the atmosphere reflect
>> infrared radiation (nitrogen and oxygen don't), it doesn't take much of
>
>> an increase in greenhouse gases to noticeably change the amount of heat
>
>> directed back toward the earth.
>>
>> There is strong evidence that this is what is happening now, and that
>> our contributions are part of the problem. Based on what we know so far
>
>> there is a strong chance this problem will increase over time.
>>
>> Given that information, it's smart to consider the implications now.
>>
>>
>>> Has the earth heated
>>> up a bit, yes, the e
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94774 is a reply to message #94773] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 10:25 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
arth goes threw changes.
>> True, and true.
>>
>> And evidence indicates there's a good chance we're involved in the
>> current climate change event.
>>
>>
>>> Should we as people stop polluting,
>>> yes.
>> We certainly need to be aware of the chemistry around us and how we
>> interact with it.
>>
>> The ozone situation is a good example. Scientists noticed a change in
>> the ozone layer. A human chemical cause was discovered. Policies were
>> changed to stop human contributions to the problem.
>>
>>
>>> Should we conserve, yes, I'm a conservative, not a liberal.
>> Great.
>>
>> To conserve what we have we need to take into account any evidence that
>
>> shows we may have a problem.
>>
>> BTW climate change and conservation are not a partisan issues, in my
>> view. At the very least, most people don't want to screw up the area
>> where they live, no matter their politics.
>>
>>
>>> Am I buying
>>> in to the liberal's sin tax plan their trying to convince the dummies
> to
>>> start paying to save the world, NO WAY!
>> That's fine. But don't confuse any perceived conspiracies with ongoing
>> climate science.
>>
>> You can promote your political views without attacking climate
>> scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
>>
>>
>>> I'm I buying in the this trilateralist
>>> plan to shift more money out of the USA, no way!
>> That's fine. But again you can promote your political views without
>> attacking climate scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
>>
>>
>>> Back in the 70's, the scientist
>>> that started this global warming stuff, was predicting that we would be
> in
>>> an ice age right now.
>> Who are you talking about?
>>
>>
>>> You can post all of the contrived research you, it won't change the truth.
>>> Choose to believe what you want, man made global warming has not been
> proven.
>> If someone is exploiting scientific data in a partisan way to push a
>> certain point of view you happen to disagree with, then fine, argue with
>
>> them.
>>
>> But don't pretend the data itself doesn't exist. There is a lot of
>> peer-reviewed research out there, and it isn't "contrived."
>>
>> If the only way to "prove" your point is to continue a risky worldwide
>> experiment until we possibly screw up the planet for future generations,
>
>> then your proof is too late to be in any way useful.
>>
>> It's much smarter to look at the decades of evidence we already have and
>
>> make prudent risk management decisions.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Jamie
>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>>
>>
>>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>>> Wish it were that easy, James. We would be poor stewards of the land
>
>>>> indeed if we carelessly dismissed the evidence to date. It's not
>>>> particularly prudent to ignore increasing evidence that shows possible
>
>>>> problems.
>>>>
>>>> The atmosphere and our use of it to store increasing amounts of unwanted
>>>> greenhouse gases is a big enough subject scientifically without being
>
>>>> sidetracked by political and economic conspiracy theories.
>>>>
>>>> Even if you enjoy discussing perceived conspiracies, be sure you don't
>
>>>> confuse them with the ongoing science.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> -Jamie
>>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> James McCloskey wrote:
>>>>> What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of crap.
>>>>> "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax
> raises
>>>>>> won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that..
>>>>>> BR
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:47e2cfc2$1@linux...
>>>>>>> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets for
>>> ten
>>>>>> cents
>>>>>>> and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making bullshit!
>>>>>>> Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are going to try to
>>> make
>>>>>>> it a sin tax that we will all have to pay. You know once the government
>>>>>>> gets a tax passed through they will never repeal it. We will be paying
>>>>> it
>>>>>>> for then on! It's a scare tactic to cow the people in to believing
>>> this
>>>>>>> bunch of bullshit. There is no significant man made global warming,
>>> it's
>>>>>>> a lie to shift the wealth out of the United States while these rats
>>> and
>>>>>> their
>>>>>>> friends get wealthy doing it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.h
>>>>>> tml
>>>>>>>> This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a while.
>>>>>> More
>>>>>>>> hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just
> been
>>>>>>>> insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it preparing
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as gas
>>> usage
>>>>>>>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas generates
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall, we're
>>>>>> going
>>>>>>>> to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking
> about
>>>>>>>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the American
>>>>>>>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to go
>>>>>> elsewhere
>>>>>>>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gimme some of that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>
>Conspiracies are another matter.
>
>Back to the science: Evidence shows the strong possibility that humans
>contributions to greenhouse gases are currently affecting the climate.
>
>If you suspect that some groups are trying to exploit this data for
>nefarious purposes, then fine, take on those groups. Dig into whatever
>conspiracies you want.
>
>But don't pretend that the scientific data doesn't exist. You can
>promote your political views without attacking climate scientists or
>dismissing scientific conclusions.
>
>Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
>
As I've said before, there many scientists that say it is not true. And
I'll say, look at what is really behind this. People like Al Gore are profiting
from this, and hanging on to power.
>
>
>James McCloskey wrote:
>> First, I don't think it is only one party that will be on this taxation
band
>> wagon, the bush's are trilateralist also, and others. "a thousand points
>> of light" " A new world order" That's trilateral talk.
>>
>> Isn't it funny that China, the biggest polluter on the planet is exempt
from
>> the law and rules the world gov. is trying to put in place. Why? This
is
>> all part of the trilateralist plan to shift the money around. The world
>> banks have now set up inside of China.
>>
>> They are trying to scare people in to a sin tax. It's about money, they
>> want a sin tax to build up the rest of the world. It's about controlling
>> the world economically. They want to restrict what america can build
and
>> do in the future.
>>
>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>> James McCloskey wrote:
>>>> The science is about money.
>>> To an extent everything is about money. But that doesn't stop people
>>>from doing good, conscientious work.
>>> You yourself require money to live. Should we therefore disbelieve
>>> everything you say?
>>>
>>> No, I don't think so. That argument is really reaching.
>>>
>>>
>>>> The science of man made global warming being
>>>> a major factor is bullshit, and it is not provable.
>>> LOL. The science is hardly bullshit.
>>>
>>> What scientists are saying is that there is a strong chance that human
>>> contributions to greenhouse gases are affecting the climate.
>>>
>>> This is because we are dumping large and increasing amounts of
>>> greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, above and beyond current natural
>>> cycles. Gases that then stay in the atmosphere for extended periods,
>>> decades or more.
>>>
>>> Keep in mind that greenhouse gases help regulate temperature on earth
by
>>
>>> reflecting back infrared radiation. This is a good thing for our
>>> survival but it can be overdone.
>>>
>>> Since only a tiny fraction of the gases in the atmosphere reflect
>>> infrared radiation
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94775 is a reply to message #94774] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 12:08 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
(nitrogen and oxygen don't), it doesn't take much
of
>>
>>> an increase in greenhouse gases to noticeably change the amount of heat
>>
>>> directed back toward the earth.
>>>
>>> There is strong evidence that this is what is happening now, and that
>>> our contributions are part of the problem. Based on what we know so far
>>
>>> there is a strong chance this problem will increase over time.
>>>
>>> Given that information, it's smart to consider the implications now.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Has the earth heated
>>>> up a bit, yes, the earth goes threw changes.
>>> True, and true.
>>>
>>> And evidence indicates there's a good chance we're involved in the
>>> current climate change event.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Should we as people stop polluting,
>>>> yes.
>>> We certainly need to be aware of the chemistry around us and how we
>>> interact with it.
>>>
>>> The ozone situation is a good example. Scientists noticed a change in
>>> the ozone layer. A human chemical cause was discovered. Policies were
>>> changed to stop human contributions to the problem.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Should we conserve, yes, I'm a conservative, not a liberal.
>>> Great.
>>>
>>> To conserve what we have we need to take into account any evidence that
>>
>>> shows we may have a problem.
>>>
>>> BTW climate change and conservation are not a partisan issues, in my
>>> view. At the very least, most people don't want to screw up the area
>>> where they live, no matter their politics.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Am I buying
>>>> in to the liberal's sin tax plan their trying to convince the dummies
>> to
>>>> start paying to save the world, NO WAY!
>>> That's fine. But don't confuse any perceived conspiracies with ongoing
>>> climate science.
>>>
>>> You can promote your political views without attacking climate
>>> scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm I buying in the this trilateralist
>>>> plan to shift more money out of the USA, no way!
>>> That's fine. But again you can promote your political views without
>>> attacking climate scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Back in the 70's, the scientist
>>>> that started this global warming stuff, was predicting that we would
be
>> in
>>>> an ice age right now.
>>> Who are you talking about?
>>>
>>>
>>>> You can post all of the contrived research you, it won't change the
truth.
>>>> Choose to believe what you want, man made global warming has not been
>> proven.
>>> If someone is exploiting scientific data in a partisan way to push a
>>> certain point of view you happen to disagree with, then fine, argue with
>>
>>> them.
>>>
>>> But don't pretend the data itself doesn't exist. There is a lot of
>>> peer-reviewed research out there, and it isn't "contrived."
>>>
>>> If the only way to "prove" your point is to continue a risky worldwide
>>> experiment until we possibly screw up the planet for future generations,
>>
>>> then your proof is too late to be in any way useful.
>>>
>>> It's much smarter to look at the decades of evidence we already have
and
>>
>>> make prudent risk management decisions.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Jamie
>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>>>> Wish it were that easy, James. We would be poor stewards of the land
>>
>>>>> indeed if we carelessly dismissed the evidence to date. It's not
>>>>> particularly prudent to ignore increasing evidence that shows possible
>>
>>>>> problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> The atmosphere and our use of it to store increasing amounts of unwanted
>>>>> greenhouse gases is a big enough subject scientifically without being
>>
>>>>> sidetracked by political and economic conspiracy theories.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even if you enjoy discussing perceived conspiracies, be sure you don't
>>
>>>>> confuse them with the ongoing science.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> -Jamie
>>>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> James McCloskey wrote:
>>>>>> What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of
crap.
>>>>>> "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax
>> raises
>>>>>>> won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that..
>>>>>>> BR
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:47e2cfc2$1@linux...
>>>>>>>> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets
for
>>>> ten
>>>>>>> cents
>>>>>>>> and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making bullshit!
>>>>>>>> Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are going to try
to
>>>> make
>>>>>>>> it a sin tax that we will all have to pay. You know once the government
>>>>>>>> gets a tax passed through they will never repeal it. We will be
paying
>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> for then on! It's a scare tactic to cow the people in to believing
>>>> this
>>>>>>>> bunch of bullshit. There is no significant man made global warming,
>>>> it's
>>>>>>>> a lie to shift the wealth out of the United States while these rats
>>>> and
>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>> friends get wealthy doing it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.h
>>>>>>> tml
>>>>>>>>> This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a
while.
>>>>>>> More
>>>>>>>>> hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just
>> been
>>>>>>>>> insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it preparing
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as
gas
>>>> usage
>>>>>>>>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas generates
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall,
we're
>>>>>>> going
>>>>>>>>> to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking
>> about
>>>>>>>>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the American
>>>>>>>>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to
go
>>>>>>> elsewhere
>>>>>>>>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gimme some of that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>Racism is alive today and it goes both ways. Want to know what pisses me
off? The Black Job expo, the Black phone book and the Black everything else
that is exclusionary. You can't have it both ways. Then again I'm pissed
at old people getting cheaper movie tickets. hehe
JohnI would have loved this to be a conspiracy, or some politicans agenda. It's
not. Nobody benefits from this.
Bjorn R
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:47e424e1$1@linux...
>
> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
> >
> >Conspiracies are another matter.
> >
> >Back to the science: Evidence shows the strong possibility that humans
> >contributions to greenhouse gases are currently affecting the climate.
> >
> >If you suspect that some groups are trying to exploit this data for
> >nefarious purposes, then fine, take on those groups. Dig into whatever
> >conspiracies you want.
> >
> >But don't pretend that the scientific data doesn't exist. You can
> >promote your political views without attacking climate scientists or
> >dismissing scientific conclusions.
> >
> >Cheers,
> > -Jamie
> > www.JamieKrutz.com
> >
>
> As I've said before, there many scientists that say it is not true. And
> I'll say, look at what is really behind this. People like Al Gore are
profiting
> from this, and hanging on to power.
>
> >
> >
> >James McCloskey wrote:
> >> First, I don't think it is only one party that will be on this taxation
> band
> >> wagon, the bush's are trilateralist also, and others. "a thousand
points
> >> of light" " A new world order" That's trilateral talk.
> >>
> >> Isn't it funny that China, the biggest polluter on the planet is exempt
> from
> >> the law and rules the world gov. is trying to put in place. Why? This
> is
> >> all part of the trilateralist plan to shift the money around. The
world
> >> banks have now set up inside of China.
> >>
> >> They are trying to scare people in to a sin tax. It's about money,
they
> >> want a sin tax to build up the rest of the world. It's about
controlling
> >> the world economically. They want to restrict what america can build
> and
> >> do in the future.
> >>
> >> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
> >>> James McCloskey wrote:
> >>>> The science is about money.
> >>> To an extent everything is about money. But that doesn't stop people
>
> >>>from doing good, conscientious work.
> >>> You yourself require money to live. Should we therefore disbelieve
> >>> everything you say?
> >>>
> >>> No, I don't think so. That argument is really reaching.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> The science of man made global warming being
> >>>> a major factor is bullshit, and it is not provable.
> >>> LOL. The science is hardly bullshit.
> >>>
> >>> What scientists are saying is that there is a strong chance that human
>
> >>> contributions to greenhouse gases are affecting the climate.
> >>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94776 is a reply to message #94775] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 11:17 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>> This is because we are dumping large and increasing amounts of
> >>> greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, above and beyond current natural
>
> >>> cycles. Gases that then stay in the atmosphere for extended periods,
>
> >>> decades or more.
> >>>
> >>> Keep in mind that greenhouse gases help regulate temperature on earth
> by
> >>
> >>> reflecting back infrared radiation. This is a good thing for our
> >>> survival but it can be overdone.
> >>>
> >>> Since only a tiny fraction of the gases in the atmosphere reflect
> >>> infrared radiation (nitrogen and oxygen don't), it doesn't take much
> of
> >>
> >>> an increase in greenhouse gases to noticeably change the amount of
heat
> >>
> >>> directed back toward the earth.
> >>>
> >>> There is strong evidence that this is what is happening now, and that
>
> >>> our contributions are part of the problem. Based on what we know so
far
> >>
> >>> there is a strong chance this problem will increase over time.
> >>>
> >>> Given that information, it's smart to consider the implications now.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Has the earth heated
> >>>> up a bit, yes, the earth goes threw changes.
> >>> True, and true.
> >>>
> >>> And evidence indicates there's a good chance we're involved in the
> >>> current climate change event.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Should we as people stop polluting,
> >>>> yes.
> >>> We certainly need to be aware of the chemistry around us and how we
> >>> interact with it.
> >>>
> >>> The ozone situation is a good example. Scientists noticed a change in
>
> >>> the ozone layer. A human chemical cause was discovered. Policies were
>
> >>> changed to stop human contributions to the problem.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Should we conserve, yes, I'm a conservative, not a liberal.
> >>> Great.
> >>>
> >>> To conserve what we have we need to take into account any evidence
that
> >>
> >>> shows we may have a problem.
> >>>
> >>> BTW climate change and conservation are not a partisan issues, in my
>
> >>> view. At the very least, most people don't want to screw up the area
>
> >>> where they live, no matter their politics.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Am I buying
> >>>> in to the liberal's sin tax plan their trying to convince the dummies
> >> to
> >>>> start paying to save the world, NO WAY!
> >>> That's fine. But don't confuse any perceived conspiracies with ongoing
>
> >>> climate science.
> >>>
> >>> You can promote your political views without attacking climate
> >>> scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I'm I buying in the this trilateralist
> >>>> plan to shift more money out of the USA, no way!
> >>> That's fine. But again you can promote your political views without
> >>> attacking climate scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Back in the 70's, the scientist
> >>>> that started this global warming stuff, was predicting that we would
> be
> >> in
> >>>> an ice age right now.
> >>> Who are you talking about?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> You can post all of the contrived research you, it won't change the
> truth.
> >>>> Choose to believe what you want, man made global warming has not
been
> >> proven.
> >>> If someone is exploiting scientific data in a partisan way to push a
>
> >>> certain point of view you happen to disagree with, then fine, argue
with
> >>
> >>> them.
> >>>
> >>> But don't pretend the data itself doesn't exist. There is a lot of
> >>> peer-reviewed research out there, and it isn't "contrived."
> >>>
> >>> If the only way to "prove" your point is to continue a risky worldwide
>
> >>> experiment until we possibly screw up the planet for future
generations,
> >>
> >>> then your proof is too late to be in any way useful.
> >>>
> >>> It's much smarter to look at the decades of evidence we already have
> and
> >>
> >>> make prudent risk management decisions.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> -Jamie
> >>> www.JamieKrutz.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Wish it were that easy, James. We would be poor stewards of the land
> >>
> >>>>> indeed if we carelessly dismissed the evidence to date. It's not
> >>>>> particularly prudent to ignore increasing evidence that shows
possible
> >>
> >>>>> problems.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The atmosphere and our use of it to store increasing amounts of
unwanted
> >>>>> greenhouse gases is a big enough subject scientifically without
being
> >>
> >>>>> sidetracked by political and economic conspiracy theories.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Even if you enjoy discussing perceived conspiracies, be sure you
don't
> >>
> >>>>> confuse them with the ongoing science.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> -Jamie
> >>>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> James McCloskey wrote:
> >>>>>> What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of
> crap.
> >>>>>> "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax
> >> raises
> >>>>>>> won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that..
> >>>>>>> BR
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>> news:47e2cfc2$1@linux...
> >>>>>>>> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets
> for
> >>>> ten
> >>>>>>> cents
> >>>>>>>> and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making
bullshit!
> >>>>>>>> Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are going to try
> to
> >>>> make
> >>>>>>>> it a sin tax that we will all have to pay. You know once the
government
> >>>>>>>> gets a tax passed through they will never repeal it. We will be
> paying
> >>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>> for then on! It's a scare tactic to cow the people in to
believing
> >>>> this
> >>>>>>>> bunch of bullshit. There is no significant man made global
warming,
> >>>> it's
> >>>>>>>> a lie to shift the wealth out of the United States while these
rats
> >>>> and
> >>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>> friends get wealthy doing it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.h
> >>>>>>> tml
> >>>>>>>>> This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a
> while.
> >>>>>>> More
> >>>>>>>>> hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just
> >> been
> >>>>>>>>> insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it
preparing
> >>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as
> gas
> >>>> usage
> >>>>>>>>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas
generates
> >>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall,
> we're
> >>>>>>> going
> >>>>>>>>> to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking
> >> about
> >>>>>>>>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the
American
> >>>>>>>>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to
> go
> >>>>>>> elsewhere
> >>>>>>>>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Gimme some of that.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>
>
>Remember where I asked you to put aside Al Gore and Exxon for a moment?
Scientifically they don't matter. Don't get distracted.
The scientific point is this: Evidence exists that shows the strong
possibility that humans contributions to greenhouse gases are currently
affecting the climate.
If you really care about conservation it would be foolish to ignore
decades of data in peer-reviewed scientific journals. It would be
extremely limiting to cherrypick a few scientists who disagree (or who
you think disagree) and ignore the rest.
At some point you're directly participating in a different conspiracy of
sorts, as a member of a group that deliberately ignores evidence and
attacks the messengers in the process.
How is that helpful?
It's not.
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
James McCloskey wrote:
> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>> Conspiracies are another matter.
>>
>> Back to the science: Evidence shows the strong possibility that humans
>> contributions to greenhouse gases are currently affecting the climate.
>>
>> If you suspect that some groups are trying to exploit this data for
>> nefarious purposes, then fine, take on those groups. Dig into whatever
>> conspiracies you want.
>>
>> But don't pretend that the scientific data doesn't exist. You can
>> promote your political views without attacking climate scientists or
>> dismissing scientific conclusions.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Jamie
>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>
> As I've said before, there many scientists that say it is not true. And
> I'll say, look at what is really behind this. People like Al Gore are profiting
> from this, and hanging on to power.
>
>>
>> James McCloskey wrote:
>>> First, I don't think it is only one party that will be on this taxation
> band
>>> wagon, the bush's are trilateralist also, and others. "a thousand points
>>> of light" " A new world order" That's trilateral talk.
>>>
>>> Isn't it funny that China, the biggest polluter on the planet is exempt
> from
>>> the law and rules the world gov. is trying to put in place. Why? This
> is
>>> all part of the trilateralist plan to shift the money around. The world
>>> banks have now set up inside of China.
>>>
>>> They are trying to scare people in to a sin tax. It's about money, they
>>> want a sin tax to build up the rest of the world. It's about controlling
>>> the world economically. They want to restrict what america can build
> and
>>> do in the future.
>>>
>>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>>> James McCloskey wrote:
>>>>> The science is about money.
>>>> To an extent everything is about money. But that doesn't stop people
>
>>> >from doing good, conscientious work.
>>>> You yourself require money to live. Should we therefore disbelieve
>>>> everything you say?
>&
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94777 is a reply to message #94776] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 13:53 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;>>
>>>> No, I don't think so. That argument is really reaching.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The science of man made global warming being
>>>>> a major factor is bullshit, and it is not provable.
>>>> LOL. The science is hardly bullshit.
>>>>
>>>> What scientists are saying is that there is a strong chance that human
>
>>>> contributions to greenhouse gases are affecting the climate.
>>>>
>>>> This is because we are dumping large and increasing amounts of
>>>> greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, above and beyond current natural
>
>>>> cycles. Gases that then stay in the atmosphere for extended periods,
>
>>>> decades or more.
>>>>
>>>> Keep in mind that greenhouse gases help regulate temperature on earth
> by
>>>> reflecting back infrared radiation. This is a good thing for our
>>>> survival but it can be overdone.
>>>>
>>>> Since only a tiny fraction of the gases in the atmosphere reflect
>>>> infrared radiation (nitrogen and oxygen don't), it doesn't take much
> of
>>>> an increase in greenhouse gases to noticeably change the amount of heat
>>>> directed back toward the earth.
>>>>
>>>> There is strong evidence that this is what is happening now, and that
>
>>>> our contributions are part of the problem. Based on what we know so far
>>>> there is a strong chance this problem will increase over time.
>>>>
>>>> Given that information, it's smart to consider the implications now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Has the earth heated
>>>>> up a bit, yes, the earth goes threw changes.
>>>> True, and true.
>>>>
>>>> And evidence indicates there's a good chance we're involved in the
>>>> current climate change event.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Should we as people stop polluting,
>>>>> yes.
>>>> We certainly need to be aware of the chemistry around us and how we
>>>> interact with it.
>>>>
>>>> The ozone situation is a good example. Scientists noticed a change in
>
>>>> the ozone layer. A human chemical cause was discovered. Policies were
>
>>>> changed to stop human contributions to the problem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Should we conserve, yes, I'm a conservative, not a liberal.
>>>> Great.
>>>>
>>>> To conserve what we have we need to take into account any evidence that
>>>> shows we may have a problem.
>>>>
>>>> BTW climate change and conservation are not a partisan issues, in my
>
>>>> view. At the very least, most people don't want to screw up the area
>
>>>> where they live, no matter their politics.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Am I buying
>>>>> in to the liberal's sin tax plan their trying to convince the dummies
>>> to
>>>>> start paying to save the world, NO WAY!
>>>> That's fine. But don't confuse any perceived conspiracies with ongoing
>
>>>> climate science.
>>>>
>>>> You can promote your political views without attacking climate
>>>> scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'm I buying in the this trilateralist
>>>>> plan to shift more money out of the USA, no way!
>>>> That's fine. But again you can promote your political views without
>>>> attacking climate scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Back in the 70's, the scientist
>>>>> that started this global warming stuff, was predicting that we would
> be
>>> in
>>>>> an ice age right now.
>>>> Who are you talking about?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You can post all of the contrived research you, it won't change the
> truth.
>>>>> Choose to believe what you want, man made global warming has not been
>>> proven.
>>>> If someone is exploiting scientific data in a partisan way to push a
>
>>>> certain point of view you happen to disagree with, then fine, argue with
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> But don't pretend the data itself doesn't exist. There is a lot of
>>>> peer-reviewed research out there, and it isn't "contrived."
>>>>
>>>> If the only way to "prove" your point is to continue a risky worldwide
>
>>>> experiment until we possibly screw up the planet for future generations,
>>>> then your proof is too late to be in any way useful.
>>>>
>>>> It's much smarter to look at the decades of evidence we already have
> and
>>>> make prudent risk management decisions.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> -Jamie
>>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Wish it were that easy, James. We would be poor stewards of the land
>>>>>> indeed if we carelessly dismissed the evidence to date. It's not
>>>>>> particularly prudent to ignore increasing evidence that shows possible
>>>>>> problems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The atmosphere and our use of it to store increasing amounts of unwanted
>>>>>> greenhouse gases is a big enough subject scientifically without being
>>>>>> sidetracked by political and economic conspiracy theories.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even if you enjoy discussing perceived conspiracies, be sure you don't
>>>>>> confuse them with the ongoing science.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> -Jamie
>>>>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> James McCloskey wrote:
>>>>>>> What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of
> crap.
>>>>>>> "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax
>>> raises
>>>>>>>> won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that..
>>>>>>>> BR
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:47e2cfc2$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets
> for
>>>>> ten
>>>>>>>> cents
>>>>>>>>> and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making bullshit!
>>>>>>>>> Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are going to try
> to
>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>> it a sin tax that we will all have to pay. You know once the government
>>>>>>>>> gets a tax passed through they will never repeal it. We will be
> paying
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> for then on! It's a scare tactic to cow the people in to believing
>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> bunch of bullshit. There is no significant man made global warming,
>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>> a lie to shift the wealth out of the United States while these rats
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>> friends get wealthy doing it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.h
>>>>>>>> tml
>>>>>>>>>> This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a
> while.
>>>>>>>> More
>>>>>>>>>> hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just
>>> been
>>>>>>>>>> insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it preparing
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as
> gas
>>>>> usage
>>>>>>>>>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas generates
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall,
> we're
>>>>>>>> going
>>>>>>>>>> to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking
>>> about
>>>>>>>>>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the American
>>>>>>>>>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to
> go
>>>>>>>> elsewhere
>>>>>>>>>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Gimme some of that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>Spell check on your default page ... guaranty should be guarantee
Pretty clean, concise and easy to navigate pages, I like the layout Bill.
It's all about delivery of content in short frames of time, as you've
correctly done. Social networking pages make me absolutely insane with all
the junk 'bling' all over them.
Since you are familiar with Adobe stuff, no doubt you're aware they bought
macromedia and now handle flash. Let me just say this. As an end
user/business network installer, flash in a browser now sucks. Adobe has
totalled screwed it up... why's that matter? If you design any flash
components your pages likely will have a high correct load failure.
How good/bad is Expression Web to operate?
Proprietary components?
AA
"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:47e41e97@linux...
> Purely, mon, dis be de Babylon!
>
> The last few weeks I've been learning web design, designing a couple sites
> for my new company. What a trip! I'm a pretty competent graphic designer
> with the Adobe Creative Suite stuff, but I'm using MS' new Expression Web
> program, which is cool, but nothing at all like designing for print.
>
> Anyway, my mind is slightly overwhelmed most of the time, with brief
> moments of joy when something miraculously works like I want. There's so
> much new terminology to learn, and the book I bought is kind of steep (720
> pages). I learned graphics by the seat of my pants. I guess I can do the
> same with this.
>
> Here's my first site:
>
> http://wammoleads.com/default.htmlI agree with Aaron, it's a clean layout, easy to grok.
Bill, what CSS book are you using? Do you recommend it?
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
Aaron Allen wrote:
> Spell check on your default page ... guaranty should be guarantee
>
> Pretty clean, concise and easy to navigate pages, I like the layout Bill.
> It's all about delivery of content in short frames of time, as you've
> correctly done. Social networking pages make me absolutely insane with all
> the junk 'bling' all over them.
>
> Since you are familiar with Adobe stuff, no doubt you're aware they bought
> macromedia and now handle flash. Let me just say this. As an end
> user/business network installer, flash in a browser now sucks. Adobe has
> totalled screwed it up... why's that matter? If you design any flash
> components your pages likely will have a high correct load failure.
>
> How good/bad is Expression Web to operate?
> Proprietary components?
>
> AA
>
>
> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:47e41e97@linux...
>> Purely, mon, dis be de Babylon!
>>
>> The last few weeks I've been learning web design, designing a couple sites
>> for my new company. What a trip! I'm a pretty competent graphic designer
>> with the Adobe Creative Suite stuff, but I'm using MS' new Expression Web
>> program, which is cool, but nothing at all like designing for print.
>>
>> Anyway, my mind is slightly overwhelmed most of the time, with brief
>> moments of joy when something miraculously works like I want. There's so
>> much new terminology to learn, and the book I bought is kind of steep (720
>> pages). I learned graphics by the seat of my pants. I guess I can do the
>> same with this.
>>
>> Here's my first site:
>>
>> http://wammoleads.com/default.html
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---=_linux47e4326b
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bach is a benevolent diety to whom all musicians should offer
a prayer to save themselves from the curse of mediocrity...
-- Claude Debussy
---=_linux47e4326b
Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="bach_shades.jpg"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bach_shades.jpg"
/9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgEASABIAAD/4QukRXhpZgAATU0AKgAAAAgABwESAAMA
AAABAAEAAAE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94780 is a reply to message #94779] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 14:19 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
DS1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---=_linux47e4326b--http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080321/D8VI00RG0.html
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080321/D8VHSS681.html
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>I think it's time to boycott China and their products, there is no sense
>in
>>supporting this government in any way.
>>
>>http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VELU0G0.html
>>
>>http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VEM3KG0.html
>http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080321/D8VI2UN0H.htmlhttp://apnews.excite.com/article/20080321/D8VHOFEG0.html
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080321/D8VI00RG0.html
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080321/D8VHSS681.html
>>
>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I think it's time to boycott China and their products, there is no sense
>>in
>>>supporting this government in any way.
>>>
>>>http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VELU0G0.html
>>>
>>>http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VEM3KG0.html
>>
>I don't think we're going to convince James, but it's a lot of other
thinking members of this group. I hope some of them take the message, it's
not about left or right, it's about doing the right thing. This group know
about science (recorded music is mainly about physics and technology,
right?), and the world need that kind of people right now, to cut the crap
and focus on the facts given us by the scientists, and the facts tells us
that we are facing rough times, even in our lifetime. So, as I said, step up
to the plate, this is not religion, this is facts. This is not the end of
the world, this is not the end of humanity, but this may be the end of our
civilisation. In other words: no nurcery homes for you , no healthcare for
your children, no law, no order ...
Bjorn R
"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:47e42e99@linux...
>
> Remember where I asked you to put aside Al Gore and Exxon for a moment?
> Scientifically they don't matter. Don't get distracted.
>
> The scientific point is this: Evidence exists that shows the strong
> possibility that humans contributions to greenhouse gases are currently
> affecting the climate.
>
> If you really care about conservation it would be foolish to ignore
> decades of data in peer-reviewed scientific journals. It would be
> extremely limiting to cherrypick a few scientists who disagree (or who
> you think disagree) and ignore the rest.
>
> At some point you're directly participating in a different conspiracy of
> sorts, as a member of a group that deliberately ignores evidence and
> attacks the messengers in the process.
>
> How is that helpful?
>
> It's not.
>
> Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>
> James McCloskey wrote:
> > Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
> >> Conspiracies are another matter.
> >>
> >> Back to the science: Evidence shows the strong possibility that humans
> >> contributions to greenhouse gases are currently affecting the climate.
> >>
> >> If you suspect that some groups are trying to exploit this data for
> >> nefarious purposes, then fine, take on those groups. Dig into whatever
> >> conspiracies you want.
> >>
> >> But don't pretend that the scientific data doesn't exist. You can
> >> promote your political views without attacking climate scientists or
> >> dismissing scientific conclusions.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> -Jamie
> >> www.JamieKrutz.com
> >>
> >
> > As I've said before, there many scientists that say it is not true. And
> > I'll say, look at what is really behind this. People like Al Gore are
profiting
> > from this, and hanging on to power.
> >
> >>
> >> James McCloskey wrote:
> >>> First, I don't think it is only one party that will be on this
taxation
> > band
> >>> wagon, the bush's are trilateralist also, and others. "a thousand
points
> >>> of light" " A new world order" That's trilateral talk.
> >>>
> >>> Isn't it funny that China, the biggest polluter on the planet is
exempt
> > from
> >>> the law and rules the world gov. is trying to put in place. Why?
This
> > is
> >>> all part of the trilateralist plan to shift the money around. The
world
> >>> banks have now set up inside of China.
> >>>
> >>> They are trying to scare people in to a sin tax. It's about money,
they
> >>> want a sin tax to build up the rest of the world. It's about
controlling
> >>> the world economically. They want to restrict what america can build
> > and
> >>> do in the future.
> >>>
> >>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
> >>>> James McCloskey wrote:
> >>>>> The science is about money.
> >>>> To an extent everything is about money. But that doesn't stop people
> >
> >>> >from doing good, conscientious work.
> >>>> You yourself require money to live. Should we therefore disbelieve
> >>>> everything you say?
> >>>>
> >>>> No, I don't think so. That argument is really reaching.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> The science of man made global warming being
> >>>>> a major factor is bullshit, and it is not provable.
> >>>> LOL. The science is hardly bullshit.
> >>>>
> >>>> What scientists are saying is that there is a strong chance that
human
> >
> >>>> contributions to greenhouse gases are affecting the climate.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is because we are dumping large and increasing amounts of
> >>>> greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, above and beyond current
natural
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: ...to be Slim is Design [message #94781 is a reply to message #94778] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 13:07 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
> >>>> cycles. Gases that then stay in the atmosphere for extended periods,
> >
> >>>> decades or more.
> >>>>
> >>>> Keep in mind that greenhouse gases help regulate temperature on earth
> > by
> >>>> reflecting back infrared radiation. This is a good thing for our
> >>>> survival but it can be overdone.
> >>>>
> >>>> Since only a tiny fraction of the gases in the atmosphere reflect
> >>>> infrared radiation (nitrogen and oxygen don't), it doesn't take much
> > of
> >>>> an increase in greenhouse gases to noticeably change the amount of
heat
> >>>> directed back toward the earth.
> >>>>
> >>>> There is strong evidence that this is what is happening now, and that
> >
> >>>> our contributions are part of the problem. Based on what we know so
far
> >>>> there is a strong chance this problem will increase over time.
> >>>>
> >>>> Given that information, it's smart to consider the implications now.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Has the earth heated
> >>>>> up a bit, yes, the earth goes threw changes.
> >>>> True, and true.
> >>>>
> >>>> And evidence indicates there's a good chance we're involved in the
> >>>> current climate change event.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Should we as people stop polluting,
> >>>>> yes.
> >>>> We certainly need to be aware of the chemistry around us and how we
> >>>> interact with it.
> >>>>
> >>>> The ozone situation is a good example. Scientists noticed a change in
> >
> >>>> the ozone layer. A human chemical cause was discovered. Policies were
> >
> >>>> changed to stop human contributions to the problem.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Should we conserve, yes, I'm a conservative, not a liberal.
> >>>> Great.
> >>>>
> >>>> To conserve what we have we need to take into account any evidence
that
> >>>> shows we may have a problem.
> >>>>
> >>>> BTW climate change and conservation are not a partisan issues, in my
> >
> >>>> view. At the very least, most people don't want to screw up the area
> >
> >>>> where they live, no matter their politics.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Am I buying
> >>>>> in to the liberal's sin tax plan their trying to convince the
dummies
> >>> to
> >>>>> start paying to save the world, NO WAY!
> >>>> That's fine. But don't confuse any perceived conspiracies with
ongoing
> >
> >>>> climate science.
> >>>>
> >>>> You can promote your political views without attacking climate
> >>>> scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> I'm I buying in the this trilateralist
> >>>>> plan to shift more money out of the USA, no way!
> >>>> That's fine. But again you can promote your political views without
> >>>> attacking climate scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Back in the 70's, the scientist
> >>>>> that started this global warming stuff, was predicting that we would
> > be
> >>> in
> >>>>> an ice age right now.
> >>>> Who are you talking about?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> You can post all of the contrived research you, it won't change the
> > truth.
> >>>>> Choose to believe what you want, man made global warming has not
been
> >>> proven.
> >>>> If someone is exploiting scientific data in a partisan way to push a
> >
> >>>> certain point of view you happen to disagree with, then fine, argue
with
> >>>> them.
> >>>>
> >>>> But don't pretend the data itself doesn't exist. There is a lot of
> >>>> peer-reviewed research out there, and it isn't "contrived."
> >>>>
> >>>> If the only way to "prove" your point is to continue a risky
worldwide
> >
> >>>> experiment until we possibly screw up the planet for future
generations,
> >>>> then your proof is too late to be in any way useful.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's much smarter to look at the decades of evidence we already have
> > and
> >>>> make prudent risk management decisions.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> -Jamie
> >>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> Wish it were that easy, James. We would be poor stewards of the
land
> >>>>>> indeed if we carelessly dismissed the evidence to date. It's not
> >>>>>> particularly prudent to ignore increasing evidence that shows
possible
> >>>>>> problems.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The atmosphere and our use of it to store increasing amounts of
unwanted
> >>>>>> greenhouse gases is a big enough subject scientifically without
being
> >>>>>> sidetracked by political and economic conspiracy theories.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Even if you enjoy discussing perceived conspiracies, be sure you
don't
> >>>>>> confuse them with the ongoing science.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>> -Jamie
> >>>>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> James McCloskey wrote:
> >>>>>>> What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of
> > crap.
> >>>>>>> "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years.
Tax
> >>> raises
> >>>>>>>> won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that..
> >>>>>>>> BR
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>> news:47e2cfc2$1@linux...
> >>>>>>>>> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets
> > for
> >>>>> ten
> >>>>>>>> cents
> >>>>>>>>> and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making
bullshit!
> >>>>>>>>> Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are going to try
> > to
> >>>>> make
> >>>>>>>>> it a sin tax that we will all have to pay. You know once the
government
> >>>>>>>>> gets a tax passed through they will never repeal it. We will be
> > paying
> >>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>> for then on! It's a scare tactic to cow the people in to
believing
> >>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>> bunch of bullshit. There is no significant man made global
warming,
> >>>>> it's
> >>>>>>>>> a lie to shift the wealth out of the United States while these
rats
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>> friends get wealthy doing it.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.h
> >>>>>>>> tml
> >>>>>>>>>> This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a
> > while.
> >>>>>>>> More
> >>>>>>>>>> hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has
just
> >>> been
> >>>>>>>>>> insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it
preparing
> >>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as
> > gas
> >>>>> usage
> >>>>>>>>>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas
generates
> >>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall,
> > we're
> >>>>>>>> going
> >>>>>>>>>> to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta'
thinking
> >>> about
> >>>>>>>>>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the
American
> >>>>>>>>>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to
> > go
> >>>>>>>> elsewhere
> >>>>>>>>>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Gimme some of that.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >You are right about that Rick. I ain't no different than you.
"willing to tell me how wrong i am when they're no different than me".
rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>man has always spoken in metaphoric, allegoric and or euphemistic
>terms...except biblicly. ya know steve i don't profess to be right
>because i just don't know but it seems there are a lot of people so
>willing to tell me how wrong i am when they're no different than me.
>
>On 22 Mar 2008 06:51:06 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>Oh, forgot one important thing.... It wasn't men who came up with the "bright
>>idea" to confuse the language, it was Gods.
>>BUT it was mans idea to attempt to build the tower and according to what
>>the Word is all about, they would have succeded if God hadn't interviened
>>with the language confusion.
>>
>>"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>Rick, I HIGHLY reccomend you crack the book open and read the text for
yourself.
>>>You keep coming up with all these goofy things about a tree being a tree
>>>and swinging a cat around... Man... that's all just foolishness. Please,
>>>read it first-THEN bring on the comments. Right now all you are doing
is
>>>"babelling" about something you don't know anything about. Read the text....
>>>It WAS all about all the Babylonians speaking Babalonian. Not a hard concept
>>>to understand. God wanted to break their power of agreement so he confused
>>>the language and no-one understood each other and the progress of the
tower
>>>seeced. Why are you fighting such a simple, well known, taught to millions,
>>>established story? You are fortunate that there are (just assuming guys)a
>>>handful of Believers on this Forum who (you may as well face it) won't
back
>>>down from the Truth?
>>>
>>>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright
>>>>ideas men come up with.
>>>>sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had one language thing. just
>>>>as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would
>>>>partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's
>>>>god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when
>>>>populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went to
>>>>the land of nod and eventually married...who...i don't
>>>>know...mom...sis...cousin rita???
>>>>i believe god was smart enough to create the laws of physics that
>>>>allow certain things to happen under certain conditions and lets the
>>>>chips fall where they may. to me god doesn't kill 250 people on a
>>>>plane and spare one as a lesson of his devine intervention
>>>>capabilities. he doesn't kill half a town yet spares a church so they
>>>>have somewhere to mourn the dead.
>>>>the truely (again to me) sad thing about the differing concepts of god
>>>>is how their used to validate the harm we do each other.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On 22 Mar 2008 00:13:36 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>http://ldolphin.org/babel.html
>>>>
>>>
>It seems it was yah that said no or was it no that said yah;-) Seems someone
have it fun on a long Friday with someone and something here;-)
"Dedric Terry" <notme@nowhere.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:47e421e9$1@linux...
>
> Point was, you simply launched a diatribe about slavery based on one word
> that had nothing, and I repeat, *nothing* to do with slavery. How about
> a game of word association, I say, "orange" you say slavery. I say
> balloon,
> you say "slavery". Get the picture yet?
>
> If you want to start a thread about how the word "fabric" offends you,
> feel
> free, but don't pass judgement and make assumptions about my intent in my
> reply to DJ. I wasn't talking to you, about you, or for your benefit,
> whoever
> you are.
>
> And I find it extraordinarily offensive that you would assume you have the
> right to cry about injustices done to other people over 150 years ago, and
> extrapolate that to being a permanent stigma dooming our country, and
> woven
> into every conversation from here to eternity. I won't bother to explain
> "fabric" to you since you didn't get it last time.
>
> If you want to play the game of associating yourself with the past for
> sake
> of playing victim, I'm part American Indian (direct descendant), and "we"
> were here first, and the first to lose rights and freedoms here. ;-) If
> you want to associate history with present day people, why not claim
> Germany
> is racist and doomed because of Hitler's genocidal mania? How about the
> Netherlands for the barbarians?
>
> Enough of this. I only came back to be clear about how diluded you are in
> your assumptions in this debate. It used to be fun to hang out here and
> exchange opinions, however diverse, but this tangent really takes the cake
> - must be the twilight zone now. I guess now you'll rant about how "cake"
> or the word "twilight" is a "bull***" word as a result of slavery by some
> twisted and bizarre association as well. Have fun.
>
>
> "yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote:
>>
>>Why do yoy think that your opinion is the right one? Are you saying that
> this
>>country
>>was'nt built on the backs of slavery? How am I a hypocrite? Ask questions?
>>My
>>first post was nothing but questions. Having the guts to stand up for
>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any
>>pansy,
>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes". are serious?
>>Why did it take so long for every man to have the right same rights? Is'nt
>>that something we were suppose to believe in? Honor? respect? Look,do'nt
>>get
>>made at me or anyone that confronts you with the truth. I love this
>>country
>>just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we
>>have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are
>>problems.(not
>>to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want
|
|
|
|
| Re: ...to be Slim is Design [message #94783 is a reply to message #94781] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 16:13 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
, and attempt to actually
>>>understand
>>>other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into
>>>left
>>>field.
>>>
>>>This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off a
>>>diatribe
>>>on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto.
>>>
>>>And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand up for
>>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any
> pansy,
>>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes.
>>>
>>>Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys
>>any
>>>credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument in
>>>spades.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Listen,
>>>>My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. I just
>>>>find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We forget
>>>>about
>>>>are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness
> I
>>>speak
>>>>of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness
>>I
>>>>speak
>>>>of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt
>>>be
>>>>played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my
>>>>comments
>>>>as detour
>>>>into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about the
>>"fabric"
>>>>of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were slave
>>>owners,and
>>>>some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing I
>>agree
>>>>on
>>>>with you is that this place has gone way down!
>>>>
>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist
>>
>>>>>propaganda as this
>>>>>(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical
>>islam,
>>>>
>>>>>not slavery. Simply amazing.
>>>>>
>>>>>This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough of
>>>>>these
>>>>>far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field.
>>>>>
>>>>>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation?
>>>>>> racisim?
>>>>
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> KKK?
>>>>>> self-righteousness!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the
> other
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of
> Islam
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some
>>>>>>>schools.
>>>>>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They
>>are
>>>>>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that
>>>>>>>community
>>>>>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries -
>>two
>>>>>>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In
> effect,
>>>>>>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in
> return
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture,
>>>>>>>just
>>>>
>>>>>>>give
>>>>>>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist
>>>>>>>protests.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the
>>US
>>>>is
>>>>>>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist"
>>>>>>>leftwing
>>>>
>>>>>>>veil
>>>>>>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those
>>>very
>>>>>>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism.
>>>>>>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one
>>case
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite
>>>>of
>>>>>>>what is the fabric of our country.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>DT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity"
>>>>>>><noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Isn't this cute?
>>>>>>>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants
>>>>>>>> better
>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>> I do:
>>>>>>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This
>>>>>>>> wasn't
>>>>>>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy
>>>>and
>>>>>> tie
>>>>>>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here
>>>>and
>>>>>>>> elsewhere for years:
>>>>>>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so
>>>>>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political
>>
>>>>>>>> strategy
>>>>>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they
>>>>>>>> have--wittingly
>>>>>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very
> enemy
>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for
>>those
>>>>>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and
>>>>all.
>>>>>>>> They really support the troops .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable
>>>>>>>> responsibility
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and
>>>>>>>> encourage
>>>>>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their
>>>
>>>>>>>> homicidal
>>>>>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof
>>>of
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> effectiveness of their strategy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated
>>>and
>>>>>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones
>>>>who
>>>>>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be
>>>>>>>> slaughtered
>>>>
>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to
>>>
>>>>>>>> protect
>>>>>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist
>>>>>>>> American
>>>>>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>
>>>>>>>> country
>>>>>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping
> them
>>>>>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to
>>>>>>>> protect
>>>>by
>>>>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists
>>>>are
>>>>>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they
>>>>can
>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation
>>>>>>>> between
>>>>>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their
>>>>>>>> heads.
>>>>I
>>>>>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I
>>didn't
>>>>>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> bye.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>It seems we have a hell of a day here;-) Ohhh, it's seems it midnight here
right now, just passed to Saturday...
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> skrev i en meddelelse news:47e42015$1@linux...
>
> Hell, I wouldn't even send Thad to hell!
>
> grin
>
> No one has any right to say any of those things. Personally, I
> believe I am in more danger of hell than someone who lives as
> an honest atheist all their lives and give Jesus a chance on their
> deathbed.
>
> I cannot pass judgment on anyone's eternal destiny.
>
> The question that concerns me this Easter is answering the
> question of what we would see if we could take a time machine
> back to Jesus tomb on early Sunday morning after his death.
>
> Would we see a bunch of guys stealing a body, or would we
> see a resurrected Lord and Saviour?
>
> None of us is wired so as to not understand the ramifications
> of either possibility.
>
> DC
>
>
> rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>i believe in do unto others as you would have them do unto you. what
>>else can be said for human behavior. of course not everyone has that
>>capability due to thier genetic wiring. just as some people can kill
>>without remorse others cannot accept certain "truths"; it is that
>>equal deserving of eternal hell according to some religious sects i
>>find problematic. after all the vengeful god of the old testament
>>become the god of love in the new and i'm not really feelin' the love
>>here according to the words of some. (not spoken here but lets be
>>honest out in the real world you can't swing a dead cat and not hit
>>someone who is willing to tell you that hell, hades, sheol is your
>>final destination.
>>
>>On 22 Mar 2008 02:42:44 +1000, "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Rick, there's some good insights here. How God works is not
>>>always transparent to us.
>>
>>see, now that's where i think the problem lies. god should know that
>>we're not going to get the message as he wants us to because we're
>>human and will translate anything to our own advantage. of all the
>>things to deserve eternal damnation for (if you believe in it) one
>>would think that the inability to "get it" would not be one of them.
>>
>>would you as a parent condemn your child to a never ending life of
>>torment simply because he or she couldn't understand the totality of
>>you being "the creator (parent)" of them. you know, it can take only
>>one gene to make someone either a murderer, saint and everything in
>>between. so to me a loving, just and forgiving god would have a
>>better plan then eternal suffering. we on the other hand are more
>>than willing to threaten and enact all levels of retribution on others
>>because we think that's what god would do.
>>>
>>>What concerns me is the reality of Jesus. From that issue flow all
>>>others, and whether there is an objective truth here or we are
>>>free to make it up as we go along.
>>and whose to say where the "making up" began. it is in my nature to
>>question what i see and hear and if i go to hell for it...then oh well
>>it's who i am, the way i was made.
>>>
>>>DC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright
>>>>ideas men come up with.
>>>>sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had one language thing. just
>>>>as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would
>>>>partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's
>>>>god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when
>>>>populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went to
>>>>the land of nod and eventually married...who...i don't
>>>>know...mom...sis...cousin rita???
>>>>i believe god was smart enough to create the laws of physics that
>>>>allow certain things to happen under certain conditions and lets the
>>>>chips fall where they may. to me god doesn't kill 250 people on a
>>>>plane and spare one as a lesson of his devine intervention
>>>>capabilities. he doesn't kill half a town yet spares a church so they
>>>>have somewhere to mourn the dead.
>>>>the truely (again to me) sad thing about the differing concepts of god
>>>>is how their used to validate the harm we do each other.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On 22 Mar 2008 00:13:36 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>http://ldolphin.org/babel.html
>>>>
>>
>Bill,
Traction? Don't have a clue what you are talking about and don't think you
do either. It looks like you jumped in about half way through the topic and
are responding to something you know nothing about. But that's ok. I wasn't
responding to you anyhow. I was responding to Rick's statement. ORIGINALLY
he clearly said the tower of babel was not about languages it was about gods.
As soon as you quit attacking me, I will drop the subject.
"Steve, I don't think Rick gives a hoot about the story. He is talking
>about his ideas on god man, trees and swingin' cats. You're prolly not
>going to get any traction on that Babylonian story".
rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>thanks bill. people will believe what they CAN believe more than what
>they're told to believe.. hell, i was raised catholic...school...the
>hole shot and if that didn't work i guess nothing will. according to
>all religious soothsayers "if you don't believe the way we/i do you
>are going to hell" so i guess everyone is.
>
>
>
>On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:39:07 -0400, Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Steve, I don't think Rick gives a hoot about the story. He is talking
>>about his ideas on god man, trees and swingin' cats. You're prolly not
>>going to get any traction on that Babylonian story.
>>
>>
>>Steve Cox wrote:
>>> Rick, I HIGHLY reccomend you crack the book open and read the text for
yourself.
>>> You keep coming up with all these goofy things about a tree being a tree
>>> and swinging a cat around... Man... that's all just foolishness. Please,
>>> read it first-THEN bring on the comments. Right now all you are doing
is
>>> "babelling" about something you don't know anything about. Read the text....
>>> It WAS all about all the Babylonians speaking Babalonian. Not a hard
concept
>>> to understand. God wanted to break their power of agreement so he confused
>>> the language and no-one understood each other and the progress of the
tower
>>> seeced. Why are you fighting such a simple, well known, taught to millions,
>>> established story? You are fortunate that there are (just assuming guys)a
>>> handful of Believers on this Forum who (you may as well face it) won't
back
>>> down from the Truth?
>>>
>>> rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright
>>>> ideas men come up with.
>>>> sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had one language thing. just
>>>> as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would
>>>> partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's
>>>> god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when
>>>> populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went
to
>>>> the land of nod and eventually married...who...i don't
>>>> know...mom...sis...cousin rita???
>>>> i believe god was smart enough to create the laws of physics that
>>>> allow certain things to happen under certain conditions and lets the
>>>> chips fall where they may. to me god doesn't kill 250 people on a
>>>> plane and spare one as a lesson of his devine intervention
>>>> capabilities. he doesn't kill half a town yet spares a church so they
>>>> have somewhere to mourn the dead.
>>>> the truely (again to me) sad thing about the differing concepts of god
>>>> is how their used to validate the harm we do each other.
>>>>
>>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: ...to be Slim is Design [message #94785 is a reply to message #94783] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 15:23 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
br />
>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>man has always spoken in metaphoric, allegoric and or euphemistic
>>terms...except biblicly. ya know steve i don't profess to be right
>>because i just don't know but it seems there are a lot of people so
>>willing to tell me how wrong i am when they're no different than me.
>>
>>On 22 Mar 2008 06:51:06 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Oh, forgot one important thing.... It wasn't men who came up with the "bright
>>>idea" to confuse the language, it was Gods.
>>>BUT it was mans idea to attempt to build the tower and according to what
>>>the Word is all about, they would have succeded if God hadn't interviened
>>>with the language confusion.
>>>
>>>"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Rick, I HIGHLY reccomend you crack the book open and read the text for
>yourself.
>>>>You keep coming up with all these goofy things about a tree being a tree
>>>>and swinging a cat around... Man... that's all just foolishness. Please,
>>>>read it first-THEN bring on the comments. Right now all you are doing
>is
>>>>"babelling" about something you don't know anything about. Read the text....
>>>>It WAS all about all the Babylonians speaking Babalonian. Not a hard concept
>>>>to understand. God wanted to break their power of agreement so he confused
>>>>the language and no-one understood each other and the progress of the
>tower
>>>>seeced. Why are you fighting such a simple, well known, taught to millions,
>>>>established story? You are fortunate that there are (just assuming guys)a
>>>>handful of Believers on this Forum who (you may as well face it) won't
>back
>>>>down from the Truth?
>>>>
>>>>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright
>>>>>ideas men come up with.
>>>>>sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had one language thing. just
>>>>>as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would
>>>>>partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's
>>>>>god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when
>>>>>populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went to
>>>>>the land of nod and eventually married...who...i don't
>>>>>know...mom...sis...cousin rita???
>>>>>i believe god was smart enough to create the laws of physics that
>>>>>allow certain things to happen under certain conditions and lets the
>>>>>chips fall where they may. to me god doesn't kill 250 people on a
>>>>>plane and spare one as a lesson of his devine intervention
>>>>>capabilities. he doesn't kill half a town yet spares a church so they
>>>>>have somewhere to mourn the dead.
>>>>>the truely (again to me) sad thing about the differing concepts of god
>>>>>is how their used to validate the harm we do each other.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On 22 Mar 2008 00:13:36 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>http://ldolphin.org/babel.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>Thanks Aaron. Actually guaranty is one of those words you can spell both
way, like advertising and advertizing. I seem to get confused a lot with
English spellings. Some words fall into a kind of grey area or some
other colour I can't distinguish.
I'm sorry to hear they screwed up Flash, but no wuckers, I won't be
writing any Flash stuff for a while! Adobe is tops in the print medias
area IMHO, so most likely they will sort things out soon.
Aaron Allen wrote:
> Spell check on your default page ... guaranty should be guarantee
>
> Pretty clean, concise and easy to navigate pages, I like the layout Bill.
> It's all about delivery of content in short frames of time, as you've
> correctly done. Social networking pages make me absolutely insane with all
> the junk 'bling' all over them.
>
> Since you are familiar with Adobe stuff, no doubt you're aware they bought
> macromedia and now handle flash. Let me just say this. As an end
> user/business network installer, flash in a browser now sucks. Adobe has
> totalled screwed it up... why's that matter? If you design any flash
> components your pages likely will have a high correct load failure.
>
> How good/bad is Expression Web to operate?
> Proprietary components?
>
> AA
>
>
> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:47e41e97@linux...
>> Purely, mon, dis be de Babylon!
>>
>> The last few weeks I've been learning web design, designing a couple sites
>> for my new company. What a trip! I'm a pretty competent graphic designer
>> with the Adobe Creative Suite stuff, but I'm using MS' new Expression Web
>> program, which is cool, but nothing at all like designing for print.
>>
>> Anyway, my mind is slightly overwhelmed most of the time, with brief
>> moments of joy when something miraculously works like I want. There's so
>> much new terminology to learn, and the book I bought is kind of steep (720
>> pages). I learned graphics by the seat of my pants. I guess I can do the
>> same with this.
>>
>> Here's my first site:
>>
>> http://wammoleads.com/default.html
>
>I have next to no experience with other programs, but the deal with EW
is it is supposed to be extremely standards compliant. Nothing at all
like Frontpage in that regard.
I bought a book on Expression Web "Using Expression Web", but it's got
plenty of CSS in it, OY!
Jamie K wrote:
>
> I agree with Aaron, it's a clean layout, easy to grok.
>
> Bill, what CSS book are you using? Do you recommend it?
>
> Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>
>
> Aaron Allen wrote:
>> Spell check on your default page ... guaranty should be guarantee
>>
>> Pretty clean, concise and easy to navigate pages, I like the layout
>> Bill. It's all about delivery of content in short frames of time, as
>> you've correctly done. Social networking pages make me absolutely
>> insane with all the junk 'bling' all over them.
>>
>> Since you are familiar with Adobe stuff, no doubt you're aware they
>> bought macromedia and now handle flash. Let me just say this. As an
>> end user/business network installer, flash in a browser now sucks.
>> Adobe has totalled screwed it up... why's that matter? If you design
>> any flash components your pages likely will have a high correct load
>> failure.
>>
>> How good/bad is Expression Web to operate?
>> Proprietary components?
>>
>> AA
>>
>>
>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:47e41e97@linux...
>>> Purely, mon, dis be de Babylon!
>>>
>>> The last few weeks I've been learning web design, designing a couple
>>> sites for my new company. What a trip! I'm a pretty competent graphic
>>> designer with the Adobe Creative Suite stuff, but I'm using MS' new
>>> Expression Web program, which is cool, but nothing at all like
>>> designing for print.
>>>
>>> Anyway, my mind is slightly overwhelmed most of the time, with brief
>>> moments of joy when something miraculously works like I want. There's
>>> so much new terminology to learn, and the book I bought is kind of
>>> steep (720 pages). I learned graphics by the seat of my pants. I
>>> guess I can do the same with this.
>>>
>>> Here's my first site:
>>>
>>> http://wammoleads.com/default.html
>>
>>Dedric,
Wow....this one went around the bend PDQ. Maybe we should start small bites,
like discussing this article:
http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html
There is a lot there to think about. that has nothing to do with race.
;o)
Deej
"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
news:C4091FAC.13618%dterry@keyofd.net...
> I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the other a
> Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of Islam -
> they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools.
> England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They are
> considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community
> (these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries - two
> completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In effect,
> the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in
> return -
> just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, just
> give
> up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist
> protests.
>
> The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the US is
> doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing
> veil
> of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those very
> ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism.
> That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one case
> of
> how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite of
> what is the fabric of our country.
>
> DT
>
> On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity"
> <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>
>> Isn't this cute?
>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html
>>
>>
>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants better
>> than
>> I do:
>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html
>>
>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This wasn't
>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy and
>> tie
>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection.
>>
>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l
>>
>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here and
>> elsewhere for years:
>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so
>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political
>> strategy
>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they
>> have--wittingly
>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very enemy
>> they
>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for those
>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and all.
>> They really support the troops .
>>
>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility for
>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and encourage
>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their
>> homicidal
>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof of the
>> effectiveness of their strategy.
>>
>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated and
>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones who
>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered once
>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to
>> protect
>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American
>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this
>> country
>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping them
>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect by
>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists are
>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they can
>> then
>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between
>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. I
>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I didn't
>> hear a peep out of OBama though.
>>
>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land.
>>
>> bye.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Don't feed the trolls!
erlilo wrote:
> It seems it was yah that said no or was it no that said yah;-) Seems someone
> have it fun on a long Friday with someone and something here;-)
>
>
> "Dedric Terry" <notme@nowhere.com> skrev i en meddelelse
> news:47e421e9$1@linux...
>> Point was, you simply launched a diatribe about slavery based on one word
>> that had nothing, and I repeat, *nothing* to do with slavery. How about
>> a game of word association, I say, "orange" you say slavery. I say
>> balloon,
>> you say "slavery". Get the picture yet?
>>
>> If you want to start a thread about how the word "fabric" offends you,
>> feel
>> free, but don't pass judgement and make assumptions about my intent in my
>> reply to DJ. I wasn't talking to you, about you, or for your benefit,
>> whoever
>> you are.
>>
>> And I find it extraordinarily offensive that you would assume you have the
>> right to cry about injustices done to other people over 150 years ago, and
>> extrapolate that to being a permanent stigma dooming our country, and
>> woven
>> into every conversation from here to eternity. I won't bother to explain
>> "fabric" to you since you didn't get it last time.
>>
>> If you want to play the game of associating yourself with the past for
>> sake
>> of playing victim, I'm part American Indian (direct descendant), and "we"
>> were here first, and the first to lose rights and freedoms here. ;-) If
>> you want to associate history with present day people, why not claim
>> Germany
>> is racist and doomed because of Hitler's genocidal mania? How about the
>> Netherlands for the barbarians?
>>
>> Enough of this. I only came back to be clear about how diluded you are in
>> your assumptions in this debate. It used to be fun to hang out here and
>> exchange opinions, however diverse, but this tangent really takes the cake
>> - must be the twilight zone now. I guess now you'll rant about how "cake"
>> or the word "twilight" is a "bull***" word as a result of slavery by some
>> twisted and bizarre association as well. Have fun.
>>
>>
>> "yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote:
>>> Why do yoy think that your opinion is the right one? Are you saying that
>> this
>>> country
>>> was'nt built on the backs of slavery? How am I a hypocrite? Ask questions?
>>> My
>>> first post was nothing but questions. Having the guts to stand up for
>>> what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any
>>> pansy,
>>> pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes". are serious?
>>> Why did it take so long for every man to have the right same rights? Is'nt
>>> that something we were suppose to believe in? Honor? respect? Look,do'nt
>>> get
>>> made at me or anyone that confronts you with the truth. I love this
>>> country
>>> just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we
>>> have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are
>>> problems.(not
>>> to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want about my
>>> credibility,my words can stand on there own! This makes them no less true
>>>
>>> "Dedric Terry" <dt@noreply.com> wrote:
>>>> Before you pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become a
>>>> hypocrit
>>>> yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually
>>>> understand
>>>> other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into
>>>> left
>>>> field.
>>>>
>>>> This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off a
>>>> diatribe
>>>> on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto.
>>>>
>>>> And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand up for
>>>> what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any
>> pansy,
>>>> pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes.
>>>>
>>>> Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys
>>> any
>>>> credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument in
>>>> spades.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote:
>>>>> Listen,
>>>>> My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. I just
>>>>> find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We forget
>>>>> about
>>>>> are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness
>> I
>>>> speak
>>>>> of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness
>>> I
>>>>> speak
>>>>> of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt
>>>> be
>>>>> played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my
>>>>> comments
>>>>> as detour
>>>>> into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about the
>>> "fabric"
>>>>> of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were slave
>>>> owners,and
>>>>> some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing I
>>> agree
>>>>> on
>>>>> with you is that this place has gone way down!
>>>>>
>>>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>> And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist
>>>>>> propaganda as this
>>>>>> (and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical
>>> islam,
>>>>>> not slavery. Simply amazing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough of
>>>>>> these
>>>>>> far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux...
>>>>>>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation?
>>>>>>> racisim?
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> KKK?
>>>>>>> self-righteousness!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the
>> other
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of
>> Islam
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some
>>>>>>>> schools.
>>>>>>>> England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They
>>> are
>>>>>>>> considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that
>>>>>>>> community
>>>>>>>> (these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries -
>>> two
>>>>>>>> completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In
>> effect,
>>>>>>>> the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in
>> return
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture,
>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>> up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist
>>>>>>>> protests.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the
>>> US
>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist"
>>>>>>>> leftwing
>>>>>>>&g
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94797 is a reply to message #94795] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 20:10 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
l.html
>>>>
>>+1 unrock on jo
On 22 Mar 2008 09:10:51 +1000, "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Bach is a benevolent diety to whom all musicians should offer
>a prayer to save themselves from the curse of mediocrity...
>
>-- Claude Debussybut if we can for the first time be a part a mitigating it's efx.
then why the hell not try.
On 22 Mar 2008 07:56:11 +1000, "James McCloskey"
<excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>There has always been global disasters.
>
>"BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>>If the global temperature raises with more than 2 degrees celcius, we'll
>>have a global disaster. It's no chance that we are going to avoid that.
>So
>>beware, the africans, the south asians and the south americans are coming
>to
>>knock on our door, and they are hungry, they are thirsty, and they are many.
>>And that's just the beginning. This thing is out of control.
>>
>>Bjorn R
>>
>>"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:47e41af0@linux...
>>> James McCloskey wrote:
>>> > The science is about money.
>>>
>>> To an extent everything is about money. But that doesn't stop people
>>> from doing good, conscientious work.
>>>
>>> You yourself require money to live. Should we therefore disbelieve
>>> everything you say?
>>>
>>> No, I don't think so. That argument is really reaching.
>>>
>>>
>>> > The science of man made global warming being
>>> > a major factor is bullshit, and it is not provable.
>>>
>>> LOL. The science is hardly bullshit.
>>>
>>> What scientists are saying is that there is a strong chance that human
>>> contributions to greenhouse gases are affecting the climate.
>>>
>>> This is because we are dumping large and increasing amounts of
>>> greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, above and beyond current natural
>>> cycles. Gases that then stay in the atmosphere for extended periods,
>>> decades or more.
>>>
>>> Keep in mind that greenhouse gases help regulate temperature on earth
>by
>>> reflecting back infrared radiation. This is a good thing for our
>>&g
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94798 is a reply to message #94795] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 21:44 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t; survival but it can be overdone.
>>>
>>> Since only a tiny fraction of the gases in the atmosphere reflect
>>> infrared radiation (nitrogen and oxygen don't), it doesn't take much of
>>> an increase in greenhouse gases to noticeably change the amount of heat
>>> directed back toward the earth.
>>>
>>> There is strong evidence that this is what is happening now, and that
>>> our contributions are part of the problem. Based on what we know so far
>>> there is a strong chance this problem will increase over time.
>>>
>>> Given that information, it's smart to consider the implications now.
>>>
>>>
>>> > Has the earth heated
>>> > up a bit, yes, the earth goes threw changes.
>>>
>>> True, and true.
>>>
>>> And evidence indicates there's a good chance we're involved in the
>>> current climate change event.
>>>
>>>
>>> > Should we as people stop polluting,
>>> > yes.
>>>
>>> We certainly need to be aware of the chemistry around us and how we
>>> interact with it.
>>>
>>> The ozone situation is a good example. Scientists noticed a change in
>>> the ozone layer. A human chemical cause was discovered. Policies were
>>> changed to stop human contributions to the problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> > Should we conserve, yes, I'm a conservative, not a liberal.
>>>
>>> Great.
>>>
>>> To conserve what we have we need to take into account any evidence that
>>> shows we may have a problem.
>>>
>>> BTW climate change and conservation are not a partisan issues, in my
>>> view. At the very least, most people don't want to screw up the area
>>> where they live, no matter their politics.
>>>
>>>
>>> > Am I buying
>>> > in to the liberal's sin tax plan their trying to convince the dummies
>to
>>> > start paying to save the world, NO WAY!
>>>
>>> That's fine. But don't confuse any perceived conspiracies with ongoing
>>> climate science.
>>>
>>> You can promote your political views without attacking climate
>>> scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions.
>>>
>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94803 is a reply to message #94800] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 22:06 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>preparing
>>> >>>>> you
>>> >>>>>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as
>gas
>>> > usage
>>> >>>>>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas
>>generates
>>> >>> is
>>> >>>>>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall,
>>we're
>>> >>>> going
>>> >>>>>> to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking
>>about
>>> >>>>>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the
>>American
>>> >>>>>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to
>go
>>> >>>> elsewhere
>>> >>>>>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Gimme some of that.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >
>>
>>definitely the devils work...but i forgive you.
;o) :o) ;o) :o) ;o) :o) ;o) :o)
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:33:56 -0400, Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com>
wrote:
>http://wammoleads.com/default.htmlhere it's the women'a expo...every day has something to do with
boobs...though once a year they throw us guy a bone...err...a prostate
exam. i'm still waiting for the color ribbon representing my...you
know...stuff...;o)
On 22 Mar 2008 08:28:26 +1000, "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>
>Racism is alive today and it goes both ways. Want to know what pisses me
>off? The Black Job expo, the Black phone book and the Black everything else
>that is exclusionary. You can't have it both ways. Then again I'm pissed
>at old people getting cheaper movie tickets. hehe
>
>Johnwtf is duid?
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:14:25 -0600, "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net>
wrote:
>Uhhhhh.......duid anyone read the article by Dinesh D'Sousa? Care to discuss
>it? Care to debunk it with facts?
>I'd be interested to hear arguments against it as it is so spot on, IMO,
>that it should be glaringly obvious to anyone over 12 years old..
>
>Of course, if you disagree with it, or with the content of my post, I'd be
>winning to listen.......and if you have any family photos with everyone
>wearing matching kaffiyas and AK47's.....that would be interesting to
>discuss too.
>
>Oh yah......BTW, my name is Doug Joyce
>
>
>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:47e42369$1@linux...
>>
>> Whew!
>>
>> hey everybody. let's take a break and cool down.
>>
>>
>>
>can we please for once discuss masturbation??? talk about not talked
about???
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:29:05 -0600, "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net>
wrote:
>Dedric,
>
>Wow....this one went around the bend PDQ. Maybe we should start small bites,
>like discussing this article:
>
>http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html
>
>There is a lot there to think about. that has nothing to do with race.
>
>;o)
>Deej
>
>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>news:C4091FAC.13618%dterry@keyofd.net...
>> I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the other a
>> Brit's
|
|
|
|
| Re: To Air is Human [message #94804 is a reply to message #94803] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 22:13 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of Islam -
>> they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools.
>> England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They are
>> considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community
>> (these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries - two
>> completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In effect,
>> the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in
>> return -
>> just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, just
>> give
>> up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist
>> protests.
>>
>> The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the US is
>> doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing
>> veil
>> of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those very
>> ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism.
>> That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one case
>> of
>> how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite of
>> what is the fabric of our country.
>>
>> DT
>>
>> On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity"
>> <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Isn't this cute?
>>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html
>>>
>>>
>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants better
>>> than
>>> I do:
>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html
>>>
>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This wasn't
>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy and
>>> tie
>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection.
>>>
>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l
>>>
>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here and
>>> elsewhere for years:
>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so
>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political
>>> strategy
>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they
>>> have--wittingly
>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very enemy
>>> they
>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for those
>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and all.
>>> They really support the troops .
>>>
>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility for
>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and encourage
>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their
>>> homicidal
>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof of the
>>> effectiveness of their strategy.
>>>
>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated and
>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones who
>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered once
>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to
>>> protect
>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American
>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this
>>> country
>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping them
>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect by
>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists are
>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they can
>>> then
>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between
>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. I
>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I didn't
>>> hear a peep out of OBama though.
>>>
>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land.
>>>
>>> bye.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>no, what i said was that instead of assigning the parable to language
that the metaphor was relating to how we deal with different concepts
or con
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue May 12 11:36:44 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01598 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
