| So when is our 10th anniversary anyhow? [message #65875] |
Tue, 28 March 2006 21:23  |
Kim
Messages: 1246 Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
,<BR>> to the piano =
part in an=20
average jazz tune, there's no comparison. One is<BR>> decidedly =
more=20
difficult, more advanced, and more clever. And harder to =
play.<BR>>=20
<BR>> And for the last 20 years, when I've wanted to learn a =
tune, I've=20
listened<BR>> to a recorded performance of the tune, and then =
worked out=20
some parts to<BR>> imitate what I hear, but with jazz the =
expectation is=20
different. For starters<BR>> most recorded versions are =
incredibly=20
personalised to the player. If I copy<BR>> what I hear on a =
record, I'll=20
just sound like somebody emulating that particular<BR>> =
recording, where=20
the expectation is that I should be doing my own, different,<BR>> =
original version. I mean I'm quite capable of doing that, but I need =
to=20
learn<BR>> the tune somehow, and while I have some ability to =
read=20
charts, I'm hardly<BR>> an expert at it, as I've found that =
working off=20
the actual recordings is<BR>> generally far more effective for =
pop/rock=20
music. Not so for jazz it seems.<BR>> <BR>> Anybody know of =
somewhere=20
where I can download copies of jazz standards <BR>> "as t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: So when is our 10th anniversary anyhow? [message #65889 is a reply to message #65875] |
Tue, 28 March 2006 23:16   |
excelav
 Messages: 2130 Registered: July 2005 Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
--------------030704090901010401090209
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I'm trying to help 2 different fellas put together their home studios.
One is a musician who'll be just doing his own stuff and one is a guy
switching from a fostex 1" 16track that he's been demoing small acts
with. They've both got no clue about the computer world - at all - and
digital scares them, so naturally they've been looking at more fostex
stuff, like the 24track rackmount.
I don't think this unit will serve either of them very well and will
take an additional amound of outboard gear to make it work, effectively
cancelling out any savings they'd be getting with this inexpensive deck.
So, I ran across this cute lil' number
http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2005/X-48.html.
<http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2005/X-48.html>
It seems like the cat's meow for a small setup. Have any of you
guys/gals any experience/knowledge about this you can share?
cheers,
jef
--------------030704090901010401090209
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I'm trying to help 2 different fellas put together their home studios.
One is a musician who'll be just doing his own stuff and one is a guy
switching from a fostex 1" 16track that he's been demoing small acts
with. They've both got no clue about the computer world - at all - and
digital scares them, so naturally they've been looking at more fostex
stuff, like the 24track rackmount. <br>
<br>
I don't think this unit will serve either of them very well and will
take an additional amound of outboard gear to make it work, effectively
cancelling out any savings they'd be getting with this inexpensive deck.<br>
<br>
So, I ran across this cute lil' number<a
href="http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2005/X-48.html">
http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2005/X-48.html.</a><br>
<br>
It seems like the cat's meow for a small setup. Have any of you
guys/gals any experience/knowledge about this you can share?<br>
<br>
cheers,<br>
<br>
jef<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------030704090901010401090209--EDS GAte=2 samples with no lookahead. To compensate, nudge ba
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|