Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Close, but no cigar.
| Close, but no cigar. [message #75266] |
Wed, 01 November 2006 19:10  |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
analog in the patch bay (via mults wired into the bays), and
>send to the analog ins of the first two mono in/stereo out engines on the
>KSP. The other two engines are driven from sends on the individual mecs
>via 8 out cards. The the 4 stereo returns are brought back in on an ADAT
>card. So there are a couple of global room type effects that can be fed
>from all 48 tracks, with a plate on the vocal card and something else where
>needed.
>
>The drum card has a TCM3000 via SPDIF inserts, and a PMC80 on another card
>the same way. Along with a couple of Paris verbs here and there...
>
>Does that make sense?? :)
>
>
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hey John, I'd be interested in a detailed description of how you use the
>IF2's
>>to get verb sends to the KSP8 across submixes
>>and get it back in to Paris. Do you use adat spdif, analog, or all 3??
>>Rod
>>"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Lamont,
>>>
>>>You mentioned in the Pulsar thread:
>>>
>>>"My XP /Paris rig is so stable, and with the URS and Waves SSL plugins..
>>>It's
>>>mixing dream for ITBB mixing.."
>>>
>>>Would you mind posting your setup, computerswise especially, but
>>>also Paris hardware. I really don;t want to jump through as many
>>>hoops as the multi computer thing. I am getting fantastic
>>>results as is with paris, especially using lots of analog inserts
>>>and external verbs. I just want to increase my horsepower and go
>>>to the SSL plugs etc. SOunds like you are doing what I want to do.
>>>
>>>I use 3 mecs with 8 analog inserts per mec (8in/8out cards) with a huge
>>rack
>>>of outboard. A couple of ADAT cards for returning the verbs like the
KSP8,
>>>spdif i/os for verbs on various cards, and IF2's for multing via analog
>>
>>>verb sends across submixes etc.
>>>
>>>I have one UAD card and usually get a sound I like and just render it.
>>>
>>>I want to go to a 4 mec setup, with more plugin horsepower. Like I said,
>>>I love my setup, and it brings me all the work I can handle.
>>>
>>>My inquiring mind wants to know... :) 'preciate it...
>>>
>>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050308000003010706080402
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Don,
Screen shot attached at 1600X1200.
Hoov
Don Nafe wrote:
> Hey Jeff
>
> Are you saying you can't load all of the mixer and if so how much?
>
> Any chance of a screen shot of a maxed out mixer so I can see what's not
> showing...would be appreciated
>
> Don
>
>
> "Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message news:4565603f@linux...
>
>>Tom,
>>
>>If sticking with the 1280X1024 resolution is a priority, go for 19". Most
>>20's are higher resolution. LCD's just look best at their "optimal
>>resolution". On the LCD's I've used, downgrading from the optimal
>>resolution makes you feel like you're in the pre truetype days (aka the
>>jaggies).
>>
>>Personally, I like the extra real estate of a 20". Can see a whole lot of
>>mixer in Paris at 1600X1200.
>>
>>:-)
>>
>>Hoov
>>
>>Tom Bruhl wrote:
>>
>>>I am thinking about adding a couple of 19"-20" LCD monitors to my pair of
>>>21" CRTs.
>>>I want to use 1280x1024 in a four monitor setup. I'm looking in the $250
>>>or less range.
>>>Here's a few questions for those that know the answers.
>>>
>>> Is there any benefit with Paris using ' widescreen ' format monitors?
>>>
>>> What parameters are most important for quality using Paris and Cubase?
>>>
>>> Maximum resolution
>>> Pixel pitch
>>> Response time
>>> Brightness Contrast ratio
>>> Viewing angles (Mine will be no more than 90 degrees
>>>horizontal.)
>>> Color support
>>> Scan range
>>> Native resolution (How does this play into my 1280x1024 usage?)
>>>
>>>Any brands to stay away from or go to?
>>>
>>>A few I'm looking at:
>>>
>>>This seems the best price/stats wise:
>>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?EdpNo=1870817&CatId=170
>>>These are all okay I guess:
>>>
>>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?EdpNo=2323225&Sku=A179-2008
>>>
>>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?EdpNo=2606497&sku=S197-2016
>>>
>>> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-det ails.asp?EdpNo=2418924&CatId=170
>>>
>>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E168240141 11&CMP=AFC-Dealnews&ATT=24-014-111
>>>
>>> http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?sku=32 0-5003&cs=19&c=us&l=en#reviews
>>>
>>>Thanks for all the help as always and happy turkey day to all.
>>>Tom the Turkey
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I choose
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Close, but no cigar.
By: Neil on Wed, 01 November 2006 19:10 |
|
|
Re: Close, but no cigar.
By: LaMont on Wed, 01 November 2006 22:04 |
|
|
Re: Close, but no cigar.
By: animix on Wed, 01 November 2006 21:50 |
|
|
Re: Close, but no cigar.
By: LaMont on Thu, 02 November 2006 08:59 |
|
|
Re: Close, but no cigar.
By: Neil on Thu, 02 November 2006 09:45 |
|
|
Re: Close, but no cigar.
By: LaMont on Thu, 02 November 2006 11:24 |
|
|
Re: Close, but no cigar.
By: excelav on Thu, 02 November 2006 11:36 |
|
|
Re: Close, but no cigar.
By: excelav on Thu, 02 November 2006 12:02 |
|
|
Re: Close, but no cigar.
By: excelav on Thu, 02 November 2006 12:33 |
|
|
Re: Close, but no cigar.
By: John [1] on Thu, 02 November 2006 11:43 |
|
|
Re: Close, but no cigar.
By: LaMont on Thu, 02 November 2006 15:34 |
|
|
Re: Close, but no cigar.
By: excelav on Thu, 02 November 2006 17:32 |
|
|
Re: Close, but no cigar.
By: LaMontt on Thu, 02 November 2006 18:35 |
|
|
Re: Close, but no cigar.
By: excelav on Thu, 02 November 2006 21:08 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Jul 16 06:22:55 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00520 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
