Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » What's royalty free and no longer under copy protection?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's royalty free and no longer under copy protection? [message #70555 is a reply to message #70549] |
Wed, 26 July 2006 10:48   |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>very sad indeed.Hi all
whenever I do to one the yahoo.video or google.video sites that are linked
here all I get is the quicktime logo with a question mark instead of seeing
the videro
Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
Have the latest and greatest version installed.
DonDon... are you using firefox? I'll betcha you wouldn't get that message
with IE. I have used firefox for quite a few years dealing with issues as
you stated... and I finally quite using it. There are others that claim it
is the best thing since peanut butter, but I refuse to accept that. It has
more bugs than a Louisiana summer night... as far as I am concerned... Just
my opinion. Anyway, I did finally get quicktime to work in firefox, but I
honestly don't remember what I changed in the settings... Sorry I can't be
more help.. perhaps someone else knows what to change....
"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:44fd4bc6$1@linux...
> Hi all
>
> whenever I do to one the yahoo.video or google.video sites that are linked
> here all I get is the quicktime logo with a question mark instead of
> seeing the videro
>
> Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
>
> Have the latest and greatest version installed.
>
> Don
>Yep...using IE...funny I had this trouble with another site
www.drummerworld.com but soon as I updated my quicktime this problem
disappeared.
Weird
Don
"Ed" <askme@email.com> wrote in message news:44fd589f$1@linux...
> Don... are you using firefox? I'll betcha you wouldn't get that message
> with IE. I have used firefox for quite a few years dealing with issues as
> you stated... and I finally quite using it. There are others that claim
> it is the best thing since peanut butter, but I refuse to accept that. It
> has more bugs than a Louisiana summer night... as far as I am concerned...
> Just my opinion. Anyway, I did finally get quicktime to work in firefox,
> but I honestly don't remember what I changed in the settings... Sorry I
> can't be more help.. perhaps someone else knows what to change....
>
>
> "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:44fd4bc6$1@linux...
>> Hi all
>>
>> whenever I do to one the yahoo.video or google.video sites that are
>> linked here all I get is the quicktime logo with a question mark instead
>> of seeing the videro
>>
>> Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
>>
>> Have the latest and greatest version installed.
>>
>> Don
>>
>
>In the older Yamaha gear, there were several Bi-Polar electrolytics in
the audio path that should be replaced regardless. This will improve
the low end response dramatically. They are usually located just
before the buffer amps. Look for "BP" on the case... and replace with
as close a value as you can find. If you can't find Bi-Polar caps,
you can make them out of two standard electrolytics back to back (the
caps will have to have double the value you want to end up with).
David.
DJ wrote:
> I've always been partial to Adcoms. Very open sounding with smooth mids. I
> was sort of thinking about the situation with the mids in the NS-10M's when
> I decided to pick this one up. I don't know how the GFA-1 will compare to
> the later 545 (100WPC) or 555. The 555 also has 200WPC, like the GFA-1. I
> think the GFA-1, being their first power amp, may be a bit of a minimalist
> design, which is what (I think) I want . I'll be strapping a PVC between the
> unbalanced outputs of my DAC-1 and the Adcom since it doesn't have any means
> of attenuation.. This one is coming from an estate and according to the
> seller, it was used on a regular basis so hopefully the caps are still in
> good shape and haven't dried out. I'll A/B it against the 2201 (if he has a
> 2201......I think his second amp is a 2201 IIRC)
>
> Deej
>
> "John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote in message
> news:44f26f9d$1@linux...
>
>>I'm with Gene--I trired Macs, Brystons, Hot House, Hafler and others, and
>>the 2201 still smoked them. Iheard some time ago about a mod that made
>
> them
>
>>even better--anyone hear of this???
>>
>>"gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>One of my clients may be swapping me a pair of NS10m's and a power amp
>>
>>for
>>
>>>>some studio time. He's also got a Yamaha P2700 power amp and, I thnk a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's royalty free and no longer under copy protection? [message #70583 is a reply to message #70582] |
Wed, 26 July 2006 19:33 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
> > those files. How can I get past this hurdle?
> >
> > Hope everyone has been well.
> > Jimmy
> >
> >
>
>Here is a tidbit from BT back in 2004...... let the magic be new all over
again :)
-------------------------------------------------
I currently have 8 EDS cards, 4 MECs, 4 C16s, 7 Analog Input cards, 4
Analog output cards and 7 ADAT cards running under XP. At one point
during testing, I hooked up 6 loaded MECs and dropped 96 tracks in
simultaneous Record. I would bet 96 tracks in Record is a record for a
DAW (no pun intended).
I wish I could tell you why it seems to like me so well, but I don't
know. Other than making sure you are patched correctly in the Paris
patchbay and making sure the correct Input card is selected in the 2nd
MEC's "MEC Modules" block, I would expect it to be a Word Clock issue.
You are using WC, right? Besides the "UseHouseSync=1" line, you MUST
create a "Default Project" in your Paris Pro folder, and the "Default
Project" MUST be set to Word Clock sync and it MUST be set to a 48K
sample rate. Even if you have your Word Clock generator set to 44.1K and
are going to work at 44.1K, the Paris Default Project MUST be set to 48K
in the Project Window when Paris boots up. After bootup, you can change
it to read 44.1K with no problems. This one nearly killed me and Chris
Thoman till we caught it.
Do this. Patch some Paris audio on your 2nd EDS card (B) to play out of
MEC 2. As in, in the Paris patchbay, patch Mixer 2 stereo outs to the
MEC 2 headphone outputs, for instance. Make sure the stereo meters on
Mixer 2 are showing audio. If you hear audio, the MEC and WC is fine,
and you have a Patchbay issue, some bad hardware, or some peculiarity of
Paris on XP that is unknown.
But my bet is that you will not hear audio play back out of MEC 2. If
that's the case, then you have a Word Clock issue that is either in the
Paris.cfg file, or the Default Project. As soon as you hear audio
playback, your inputs will work. Patience, Spockish logic and staying
methodical is your best bet.
Regards,
Brian T
"Uptown Jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:44fdd54a@linux...
> Hello again. I think I've finally solved my computer problems. Two
> questions:
>
> 1. How did you create that default project file with external clocking? I
> feel retarded...
>
> 2. General question: I have a damaged XP installation on another hard
> drive
> with some files I wouldn't mind recovering. Nothing too critical, but I'd
> like to retrieve them before attempting to repair that XP installation.
> However, it seems that the XP code still has administrative control over
> those files. How can I get past this hurdle?
>
> Hope everyone has been well.
> Jimmy
>
>Is it possible that the in and out port have the same name? I remember there
being a problem with that. You might fool around in the config files or ask
tech support for the DMX about that particular.
AA
"Chris" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's royalty free and no longer under copy protection? [message #70604 is a reply to message #70598] |
Thu, 27 July 2006 15:54 |
Martin Harrington
Messages: 560
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
After this, they will rehire a foreign work force to fill those jobs and
nobody will think anything of it.
We need new government, and I'm not talking about the divided two party system.
James"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>After this, they will rehire a foreign work force to fill those jobs and
>nobody will think anything of it.
>
>We need new government, and I'm not talking about the divided two party
system.
What the hell does the government have to do with whether or not
a body-piercing chain in another country fires someone, or an
electronics retailer here can't compete because they choose to
operate out of 1,500 square foot storefronts when all their
competitors are running big-box 50,000 square-foot
establishments with a wider selection of products?
NeilCuz we want a new government. Ask us what time it is and we'll answer "We
need a new government" ! Sign me up !
"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>After this, they will rehire a foreign work force to fill those jobs and
>>nobody will think anything of it.
>>
>>We need new government, and I'm not talking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's royalty free and no longer under copy protection? [message #70627 is a reply to message #70624] |
Fri, 28 July 2006 05:45 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
k me out are you??? ;-)
>
>The plan is to knock the Paris rig in the main studio down
>to a 2 card, 2 MEC system, and roll it back to ME for ease
>of adat I/O. The Nuendo machine will end up with the Magma
>for the two 95652 cards and the UAD's. The HD rig will have
>48 analog in (plus digital) and 24+ analog and digital outs.
> The whole mess will be tied into the DM2K and I will be
>able to route anything to anything... very DJ-esque, don't
>you think? ;-) The DM also has a remote layer for ProTools,
>so I should be able to toggle between controlling Nunedo and
>Protools on the same session. One I get it running, I'll
>post up some info on routing. I shouldn't have to turn away
>anything work-wise by the time it's done.
>
>The remaining Bundle III's (5 of them) will be spread around
>the facility, keeping some stuff for spares.
>
>Paris ain't goin' anywhere here!
>
>David.
>
>Chas. Duncan wrote:
>> Good luck with that, young man...
>>
>> And: will the last person to leave the Paris Forum kindly turn off the
>> lights?
>>
>> chas.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 14:22:05 -0600, EK Sound <askme@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>After years of turning away work and trying to convince clients that
>>>we can still do great work without certain tools, we have finally caved.
>>>
>>>We just ordered HD3... and a.... (shudder)... MACpro.
>>>
>>>I feel so dirty......
>>>
>>>David.
>>
>>Man that's a tall order, kinda like trying to clear all the hipsters, slackers,
oddballs and afternoon risers out of Athens :-)
Chuck
"Uptown Jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>Actually, what we might consider doing is to get the multi-national
>corporations OUT of our existing government.
>
>I'm afraid that we've allowed our precious way of life to be seriously
>compromised by corporate control of Washington, and by our own greedy
>appetites for all that corporate product/filth.
>
>The idea that freedom of speech, as guaranteed for individuals in the
>Constitution, is used as an excuse for multinationals to dominate
>proceedings in Washington is patently absurd. And it will probably further
>ensure the deterioration of political and social conditions in this
>country...
>
>Jimmy
>
>
>"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:44fef936$1@linux...
>>
>> What the hell does the government have to do with whether or not
>> a body-piercing chain in another country fires someone, or an
>> electronics retailer here can't compete because they choose to
>> operate out of 1,500 square foot storefronts when all their
>> competitors are running big-box 50,000 square-foot
>> establishments with a wider selection of products?
>>
>> Neil
>
>Made my morning you old fart!
rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Working people frequently ask retired people what they do to make
>their
>days interesting. Well for example, the other day I went into town and
>went into a shop. I was only in there for about 5 minutes, when I came
>out
>there was a cop writing out a parking ticket
>
>I went up to him
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's royalty free and no longer under copy protection? [message #70654 is a reply to message #70627] |
Fri, 28 July 2006 16:43 |
Martin Harrington
Messages: 560
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;
>>Jimmy
>>
>>"chuck dufy" <c@c.com> wrote in message news:44fffdc1$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Man that's a tall order, kinda like trying to clear all the hipsters,
>>slackers,
>>> oddballs and afternoon risers out of Athens :-)
>>>
>>
>>
>Oh no, it wont work in your machine at all, just send it to me over here
in Boston, I'll look after it for you.
Seriously, it;s been a while, but If I recall, pretty much plug her in, the
bitch it the VST wrapper thing...some one here will guide you through it,
(not me of course)
I use FXpanstion 3,3 ...but I think Dimitrios found a better alternative.(Chainer
maybe) you will also need sampleslide. and a few numbers to remember.
"Chris Lang" <yo@yo.yo> wrote:
>
>Hi there-
>
>I am about to buy my first UAD-1 card. Oh yes.
>
>I am just curious whether I can just put it in any available
>PCI slot, and it will get along with Paris, or do I need to
>do anything special?
>
>Thanks as always,
>ChrisIIRC, the UAD-1 plays nicely with EDS cards when sharing an IRQ.
"Chris Lang" <yo@yo.yo> wrote in message news:4500a783$1@linux...
>
> Hi there-
>
> I am about to buy my first UAD-1 card. Oh yes.
>
> I am just curious whether I can just put it in any available
> PCI slot, and it will get along with Paris, or do I need to
> do anything special?
>
> Thanks as always,
> ChrisHi folks,
Somewhat unfortunately, I've got some serious tidying up of drum tracks to
do. It's driving me nuts! (Anyone who wants an edit job / drummers with studios
looking to record could try propositioning me!).
I've got drums recorded across 12 channels, but much of the playing needs
"quantising", ideally around a groove (i.e. the grove when he gets it right;
or just reprogramming it from scratch). I'm a bit clueless when it comes
to the possibilities offered in cubase / recycle, but presumable this would
be the way forward, rather than trying to do it all by hand in Paris. Problem
with recycle, as far as I understand it, it that it works on mono, maybe
even stereo, files, but not 12 at once.
Hot tips greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Dan"dan b" <daniel_burne@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Hi folks,
>Somewhat unfortunately, I've got some serious tidying up of drum tracks
to
>do. It's driving me nuts! (Anyone who wants an edit job / drummers with
studios
>looking to record could try propositioning me!).
>I've got drums recorded across 12 channels, but much of the playing needs
>"quantising", ideally around a groove (i.e. the grove when he gets it right;
>or just reprogramming it from scratch). I'm a bit clueless when it comes
>to the possibilities offered in cubase / recycle, but presumable this would
>be the way forward, rather than trying to do it all by hand in Paris. Problem
>with recycle, as far as I understand it, it that it works on mono, maybe
>even stereo, files, but not 12 at once.
>
>Hot tips greatly appreciated.
>Thanks,
>Dan
You are correct about Recycle, it will not work across 12 tracks. I suggest
you move the wave files to Pro Tools and do this with Beat Detective (not
the LE version which only works on two tracks.) You should be able to find
many Pro Tools users who will take this on.
It is much easier if it was recorded to a grid. Saying you want to quantize
to section of the song he did well, will only work if the tempo is exactly
the same throughout the track. This is unlikely if his playing was that sloppy.
Beat Detective will allow you to extract an averaged tempo map out of the
performance and quantize to that, but it may still speed up and slow down.
It can also extract a “groove” from a well-played section and quantize using
the groove on top of the generated tempo map.
If its just a matter of a few late kick or snare hits, I would do it in Paris,
but be sure to cut and move all 12 tracks simultaneously. If you need do
advanced surgery, Beat Detective is the best tool for the job.
genealso, that way when it pisses you off you can just shove it down the hill <
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's royalty free and no longer under copy protection? [message #70665 is a reply to message #70654] |
Sat, 29 July 2006 02:58 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
here will be some,
>and
>>it's different for 16 bit bounce than 24 bit bounce. Also ME is different
>>than xp on the same system, and every system is different. This is assuming
>>your dragging the segments (not the raw files) back into the same ppj.
It's
>>going to be somewhere in the sub 1ms range, but if your mixing it back
with
>>the other drums...it will matter.
>>Rod
>>"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
>>>
>>>Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
>>>Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring it
>back
>>>in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss
of
>>>course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of course
>>>you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would
>be
>>>phase issues.
>>>Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
>>Thanks for the info,
Is the # static for each system?
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>It varies from system to system. You just have to figure yours out. I've
had
>3 different systems, and they've all been different. I think it has to do
>with how fast the cpu can kick into gear/the OS/ and the app.
>The numbers for an external i/o should be the same however. I don't have
>those. Maybe some one else does.
>Rod
>"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Ok, so there is latency on Bounce To DIsc, I suppose that makes sense,
oes
>>anyone know the exact numbers? Also, what about if a externeal comp is
used?
>>Thanks rod.
>>
>>
>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I do this all the time. The only thing else you really have to do, is
adjust
>>>for the bounce latency. If you do a bounce to disk, there will be some,
>>and
>>>it's different for 16 bit bounce than 24 bit bounce. Also ME is different
>>>than xp on the same system, and every system is different. This is assuming
>>>your dragging the segments (not the raw files) back into the same ppj.
>It's
>>>going to be somewhere in the sub 1ms range, but if your mixing it back
>with
>>>the other drums...it will matter.
>>>Rod
>>>"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ok, I am really wanting to crush a drum group.
>>>>
>>>>Has anyone tried this? and if so is there a drawback?
>>>>Bounce a mix with just the drums on, or add a little bass and bring it
>>back
>>>>in to paris on 2 channels on the same EDS card as the drums and basss
>of
>>>>course, and crush those 2 channels with say 1176's...seems simple of
course
>>>>you;d have to start the bounce from ground zero exactly or there would
>>be
>>>>phase issues.
>>>>Besides the extra step and watsed channels, is there a drawback?
>>>
>You mean you don't already??
:)
"John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>
>It is about tennis. What don't you get? I'm thinking to be successful I
need
>to start doing 91 mixes per song.
>
>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>oops...thought this was going to be about tennis...
>>
>>
>>
>>On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:48:45 -0400, John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>
>>>http://gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php?t=84587
>>
>LOL!
Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
John Macy wrote:
> You mean you don't already??
>
> :)
>
>
> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>> It is about tennis. What don't you get? I'm thinking to be successful I
> need
>> to start doing 91 mixes per song.
>>
>> rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri May 15 03:36:38 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.55141 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
