| Thanks Cubase [message #88269] |
Wed, 18 July 2007 04:26 |
![John [1] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "John [1] is currently offline")
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
arts...suggestions.
thanksI think you would need senderella or something like it."John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:46f93c8b$1@linux...
>
> I think you would need senderella or something like it.
It's possible to do this in Reaper with the click of a mouse. I've never
seen anything like the routing possibilities in that app. Of course, if
Cubase could route like Reaper, the control room function would be
redundant, plus it could be used with ASIO direct monitoring. God forbid
that something should work easily and without latency issues.
;o)This would require "source" assignment, rather than output assignment.
In other words, assign a source to a particular output (or multiple
outs) instead of assigning an output to a channel or send.
David.
DJ wrote:
> "John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:46f93c8b$1@linux...
>
>>I think you would need senderella or something like it.
>
>
> It's possible to do this in Reaper with the click of a mouse. I've never
> seen anything like the routing possibilities in that app. Of course, if
> Cubase could route like Reaper, the control room function would be
> redundant, plus it could be used with ASIO direct monitoring. God forbid
> that something should work easily and without latency issues.
>
> ;o)
>
>"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:46f940a6@linux...
> This would require "source" assignment, rather than output assignment. In
> other words, assign a source to a particular output (or multiple outs)
> instead of assigning an output to a channel or send.
>
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
