|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Creamware Scope.......anyone? [message #74111 is a reply to message #74092] |
Sun, 15 October 2006 19:36   |
Jesse Skeens
Messages: 53 Registered: November 2005
|
Member |
|
|
nor parties.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are different ways to attempt to meet any threat, diffuse the
>>>>> threat and find solutions for any situation. Maybe, just maybe, we'll
>>>>> get some further options on the table now to meet this threat, and
>>>>> maybe, just maybe, they'll work better than the current approach which
>>>>> has hardly been flawless.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever we do, let's not allow ourselves to be manipulated by
>>>>> terrorists into strutting around acting like overcompensating insecure
>>>>> spendthrift fools while undercutting our own democracy with shifty
>>>>> eyed abject fear - IOW, becoming terrorized. Fear sells, but maybe,
>>>>> just maybe, we're better than that.
>>>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Creamware Scope.......anyone? [message #74115 is a reply to message #74092] |
Sun, 15 October 2006 21:14  |
Chris Ludwig
 Messages: 868 Registered: May 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
y and the assets themselves are losing
>>>>>>>>>>> value. More than
>>>>>>>>>>> any other nation in history, the United States depends,
>>>>>>>>>>> economically, on
>>>>>>>>>>> the kindness of strangers."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/050418ta_talk _surowiecki
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Gene
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>Ike is a fascinating one. The most recent (and likely last) president who
kinda sorta fit the classical model of a politician. He was a general, a
political moderate, a reader, writer, and even a painter. He respected the
constitution and the separation of powers, and was thus personally opposed
to McCarthy but did little to stop what was a Congressional matter. What's
odd was that he helped oversee the transformation of our state from a flawed
but generally improving republic into the empire it became by the time he
left office. Then, in that last speech, he suddenly felt
|
|
|
|