The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » PING! - DJ
PING! - DJ [message #85112] Wed, 23 May 2007 20:47 Go to next message
Sandy Tipping is currently offline  Sandy Tipping   UNITED STATES
Messages: 54
Registered: June 2007
Member

>>>RECORDED
>>>!
>>>Isn't that so ?
>>>If you record the da of mytek back to myte's ad and then route the spdif
>>>out to get recorded as digital file on any medium ,pc or dat
Re: PING! - DJ [message #85114 is a reply to message #85112] Wed, 23 May 2007 21:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [4] is currently offline  Deej [4]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member
uot;Really nice" mode,
>>>or
>>>>
>>>>>something more colored.
>>>>>
>>>>>Deej
>>>>>
>>>>>"Dimitrios" <musurgioNOSPAM@otenet.gr> wrote in message
>>>>>news:467bdf35$1@linux...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i was wondering if a great DA
Re: PING! - DJ [message #85118 is a reply to message #85112] Wed, 23 May 2007 21:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dedric Terry is currently offline  Dedric Terry   UNITED STATES
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
Senior Member
t;something more colored.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Deej
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Dimitrios" <musurgioNOSPAM@otenet.gr> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:467bdf35$1@linux...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i was wondering if a great DA which opens up the stero field adds
Re: PING! - DJ [message #85129 is a reply to message #85118] Thu, 24 May 2007 00:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dimitrios is currently offline  Dimitrios   
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
Senior Member
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>But you can't _record_ that. Put another way, if Dimitrios fed the SPDIF of
an RME Mutliface (BTW - running down RME gear on sonics is pretty ballsy
in my opinion. Maybe not the best in the world, but certainly not the worst)
and ran it through Deej's Benchmark it would sound like the Benchmark. So
what Dimitrios is hearing is the converter. A perfect DA -> AD loop, with
infinite sample rate and word length, would create exactly the exact same
file as the original. So why do it? Clock jitter? You said yourself jitter
is a record/playback issue. The file doesn't have any jitter, it can't any
more than tape can have a head misaligned.

Even if the Mytek is used as an effect, if the RME converter is so awful,
will the Mytek'd file played through it sound better? And how much better
will the final playback devices be sonically than the RME?

I'm saying this is a bad idea
Re: PING! - DJ [message #85167 is a reply to message #85129] Thu, 24 May 2007 15:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sandy Tipping is currently offline  Sandy Tipping   UNITED STATES
Messages: 54
Registered: June 2007
Member
ice for rock or R&B because
they won’t add any energy, and they don’t handle loud.

Gene

"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>Anyone ever hear these? I've heard the smaller B&W's (DM-
>series, I think), and the really f*king super high-end ones
>that look like R2D2 with a tweeter on it's head, but not this
>series... anyone ever use them?
>
>I ask because I was out running errands today & noticed that a
>local hi-fi place has 701's (not hooked up, though) and the
>price seemed reasonable - $799 each. (well, reasonable for that
>level of quality, from what I've heard of their other stuff).
>
>Anyone?
>
>BTW, Deej - when I was out & about, I was able to find exactly
>ONE half-rack-height spacer... no vents, jsut a solid spacer. I
>grabbed it in case you can use it -I don't even know if one is
>even worth shipping, though - lemme know if you can use it,
>otherwise I can always just return it.
>
>Neil
>Are you using this on every individual channel to get the sound you like?
I haven’t had a chance to try it yet.
Gene

"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>HELLO!!!! CAN YOU HEAR ME????
>
>;O)
>I'm find that it can get a bit more colored than I'm used to but yeah, I'm
using in on all 18 tracks of an 18 channel mix right now. With the channel
set to default it uses very little in the way of resources but add some nice
mojo. It's possible to then just enable the different modules as needed
instead of all of them. On a 44.1 project, you can get a lot of these going
on a 4 card system and still have room left over to drop in the *vintage*
processors to taste.

Deej

"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:467d9116$1@linux...
>
> Are you using this on every individual channel to get the sound you like?
> I haven't had a chance to try it yet.
> Gene
>
> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>HELLO!!!! CAN YOU HEAR ME????
>>
>>;O)
>>
>Geno - but what if I DON'T want any attitude? IOW, what if I
want to hear the RAWK with added energy, as in a damn good
refence monitor for playback purposes? Would they be good for
that?

Also, B&W - I've heard their stuff tends to like a lot of
power pumped into the
Re: PING! - DJ [message #85169 is a reply to message #85167] Thu, 24 May 2007 15:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [4] is currently offline  Deej [4]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member
IU@OIU.com" target="_blank">OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>
>>Anyone ever hear these? I've heard the smaller B&W's (DM-
>>series, I think), and the really f*king super high-end ones
>>that look like R2D2 with a tweeter on it's head, but not this
>>series... anyone ever use them?
>>
>>I ask because I was out running errands today & noticed that a
>>local hi-fi place has 701's (not hooked up, though) and the
>>price seemed reasonable - $799 each. (well, reasonable for that
>>level of quality, from what I've heard of their other stuff).
>>
>>Anyone?
>>
>>BTW, Deej - when I was out & about, I was able to find exactly
>>ONE half-rack-height spacer... no vents, jsut a solid spacer. I
>>grabbed it in case you can use it -I don't even know if one is
>>even worth shipping, though - lemme know if you can use it,
>>otherwise I can always just return it.
>>
>>Neil
>>
>They like and need a lot of power. They are fairly inefficient but good speakers.
You should give them a listen as see for yourself if they will work.

I like the new 805S a lot.

Gene

"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>Geno - but what if I DON'T want any attitude? IOW, what if I
>want to hear the RAWK with added energy, as in a damn good
>refence monitor for playback purposes? Would they be good for
>that?
>
>Also, B&W - I've heard their stuff tends to like a lot of
>power pumped into them... you're saying that particular series
>doen't like that, though, yes?
>
>Neil
>
>
>"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>>
>>Excellent choice for classical and jazz work. Also great for high quality
>>audio for TV/video. Would not be my first choice for rock or R&B because
>>they won’t add any energy, and they don’t handle loud.
>>
>>Gene
>>
>>"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Anyone ever hear these? I've heard the smaller B&W's (DM-
>>>series, I think), and the really f*king super high-end ones
>>>that look like R2D2 with a tweeter on it's head, but not this
>>>series... anyone ever use them?
>>>
>>>I ask because I was out running errands today & noticed that a
>>>local hi-fi place has 701's (not hooked up, though) and the
>>>price seemed reasonable - $799 each. (well, reasonable for that
>>>level of quality, from what I've heard of their other stuff).
>>>
>>>Anyone?
>>>
>>>BTW, Deej - when I was out & about, I was able to find exactly
>>>ONE half-rack-height spacer... no vents, jsut a solid spacer. I
>>>grabbed it in case you can use it -I don't even know if one is
>>>even w
Re: PING! - DJ [message #85231 is a reply to message #85169] Fri, 25 May 2007 07:22 Go to previous message
Sandy Tipping is currently offline  Sandy Tipping   UNITED STATES
Messages: 54
Registered: June 2007
Member
; external clock make a significant difference on a 1-MEC system or would a
>> DAConverter help clear up any muddyness or harshness more?
>
>
> The DAC-1 will give you clearer picture of your mix. It is far superior to
> the Paris DAC, even if Paris is clocked to an external source. The
> external clock will improve the A/D and D/A resolution of your entire
> system, including the D/A that you use to monitor you mix. This D/A
> converter still will not achieve the level of resolution of a Benchmark
> DAC-1, Mytek Stereo D/A, Lavry, etc, but it will definitely help. What I
> would look for is something like an old Apogee PSX 100
>
> http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/WNAMM99/Apogee/PSX-100. html
>
> ..........or an older Mytek Stereo AD/DA unit (I forget that they are
> named, but Dimitrios would know.he has one) and David Seymour at Mytek
> might be able to help you find one..
>
> These units have a clock that you can use to clock Paris externally and
> you will get a superior A/D converter for critical tracking and a superior
> D/A converter for monitoring, all in the same box.
>
> You don't need anything capable of over 48KHz sample rate with Paris.
>
> Deej
>
>
>The IQ of the 'average' american is 100. Significant problems with your plan
:-)

Chuck
Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>Actually I think we ought to invite any who want citizenship and can
>speak some English to take an IQ and an aptitude test. Any with an IQ
>over 120 and a good aptitude score, if they have a clean legal record
>and a record of steady employment, should be offered citizenship. The
>rest should be refused citizenship and should be sent back. We can use
>more able, intelligent people. Who says we should not pick the top
>applicants just like a company does. That's how we can make our country

>stronger.
>
>Maybe we should offer Mexico to swap 1 of our dummies for 2 of their
>smart ones. That seems like a darn good deal to me.
>
>DJ wrote:
>> Nothing hard about this. It's basically defining status, making employers

>> who hire migrant labor pay for their insurance so it doesn't fall oun
the
>> healthcare infrastructure, hiring enough people to enforce some simple
laws
>> and applying enforcement unifromly. the employers will raise the prices
of
>> the goods they produce to cover the costs of the healthcare and we will
all
>> pay for it, inculding the migrant workers paying their fair share.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:467be825@linux...
>>> Now Guys..Really now.
>>> Do you realy think this goverment has the capacity and wherewithall to

>>> achieve
>>> said list of DJ's??
>>>
>>> Aren't you guys the ones who are always saying that the Gove can't run
a
>>> national health care system? How can they effectivly pull off this off??
>>>
>>>
>>> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:467b3fb6@linux...
>>>>> Deportation is not necessary. If we spent $100 mill putting Americans
>>> who
>>>>> hire illegals i
Previous Topic: Converting PAFs for use in Cubase4
Next Topic: MOTU problem - ideas?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri May 08 04:57:06 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08734 seconds