Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OT: Marshall Cabinet questions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Marshall Cabinet questions [message #72437 is a reply to message #72396] |
Fri, 15 September 2006 07:05   |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
on"
<tony@standinghampton.com> wrote:
>Greetings Everyone!
>
>I know this is in reference to an "oldish" post, but I was wondering if many
>people downloaded these files. I did, but never got around to messing with a
>remix. Anyway, I was wondering what people's thoughts were on these tracks.
>I like Peter Gabriel, and always though his albums/CD's sounded great. I
>assumed the raw tracks would be "pristine", but soloing these tracks, you
>can hear all kinds of buzzing, hiss, and just a real noisy noise in general.
>I'm wondering if anyone else was surprised by this. I still think his stuff
>sounds great, it just threw me a little that the individual tracks would be
>so noisy. Comments?
>
>TonyPaul Artola <artola@comcast.net> wrote:
>Of course, the
>difference between PG and me is that he is polishing gold nuggets,
>whereas I am polishing, well, you know what!
Gold-Plated Diapers, Baby!
lol"Neil" <IUIOU@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>That one seems (and SOUNDS) really cool...
>
>Anyone try the demo yet, or am I gonna have to guinea-pig it for
>the group? lol
OK, so I downloaded the demo, and it sounds really GREAT!
HOWEVER... it's a CPU hog, as you might imagine. On my Athlon
64 2800+ it takes up 20% of the CPU cycles, rendering it
unusable for me.
Neil
NeilIt was about 2-3 years ago, which in reality is an eternity in the tech
world, so hardly a strong case against Dell - just one experience in
general. I've seen some Dells on the other native DAW forums (Nuendo,
Samplitude at least), so they work fine for a lot of people. This was also
a system they had been using, not bought with video in mind - just bought
based on price alone.
Why not hold out 5 years - Intel is promising 80 cores by then. 80... That
should run a boatload of convolution reverbs at 24/192k.
Dedric
On 9/26/06 8:34 PM, in article 4519e34c$1@linux, "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com>
wrote:
>
> How long ago was this? I used to shy away from some 'commodity' manufacturers
> but when I look under the hood these days it looks like they're using nearly
> identical core chipsets to the ASUS and Chaintechs of the world. The
> differences
> are in extras, gigabit networking, Promise SATA controllers, stuff like that.
>
>
> Maybe I'll test the theory. My old audio machine (an old Athlon box) is in
> bad shape. I was going to hold out for a fancy quad core but maybe I'll snap
> up one of these Dells and see if I can make into an audio box.
>
> Anybody want to bet against me?
>
> TCB
>
> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>> I think it depends on the use and the model. We had a Dell for video
>> editing at a previous job - tried to add a new video card to get a dual
>> display and it caused nothing but headaches, but I attributed that to a
>> cheap motherboard more than anything (everything in this model was cheap/not
>> industry standard).
>>
>> I built a custom system for them and it ran great.
>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Marshall Cabinet questions [message #72439 is a reply to message #72437] |
Fri, 15 September 2006 07:49 |
AA
Messages: 18
Registered: June 2007
|
Junior Member |
|
|
br />
Chris
Nappy wrote:
> www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/LiquidMix/
>
> respect
> Nappy
--
Chris Ludwig
ADK
chrisl@adkproaudio.com <mailto:chrisl@adkproaudio.com>
www.adkproaudio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
(859) 635-5762This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C6E379.A3D96840
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
John,
Those other things frighten me. I'll stick with
the first one though.
Thanks,
Tom
"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:451c6970@linux...
Here's a few more you might like. Control Panel / Display / =
Appearance=20
/ Effects / "Use following method to smooth screen fonts" / Select =
Clear=20
Type. Makes fonts look much better.
Control Panel / Display / Appearance / Advanced / Item / Icon / Change =
Font Size to 12. This changes explorer font size and desktop icon =
size.
And attached are more registry thingies.
Enjoy.
John
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> John,
> =20
> Saaaaahahahahahahaaaaaweeeeeeeeeet!
> =20
> You have forever changed my life. Fewer bad
> words will come from my mouth regarding Mr. Gates
> from this moment on.
> =20
> Thank a big Ewe!
> Tom
> =20
> =20
>=20
> "John" <no@no.com <mailto:no@no.com>> wrote in message
> news:451c386a@linux...
> Oh, that's easy, from Windows Explorer, Pick "List View", then
> Tools /
> Folder Options / View Tab / Apply to all folders.
>=20
> If you want My computer to default to 2 pane view: Tools / =
FOlder
> Options / File Types / Folder / Advanced / set Explore as =
Default.
>=20
> Enjoy,
> John
>=20
> Tom Bruhl wrote:
> > Is there any way to have all windows open up in list form
> > rather than defaulting to icons all the time? It drives me
> > crazy having to switch for the last ten years of my life.
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> > http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------------------------------------------------------------ -------------=
-----
=FF=FEWindows Registry Editor Version 5.00
=
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion \Explorer\Adv=
anced]
"EnableBalloonTips"=3Ddword:00000000
------------------------------------------------------------ -------------=
-----
=FF=FEWindows Registry Editor Version 5.00
=
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersio n\OptimalLayo=
ut]
"LayoutFilePath"=3D"C:\\WINDOWS\\Prefetch\\Layout.ini"
"EnableAutoLayout"=3Ddword:00000000
------------------------------------------------------------ -------------=
-----
System Key: =
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersio n\
OptimalLayout]
Value Name: EnableAutoLayout
Data Type: REG_DWORD (DWORD Value)
Value Data: (0 =3D disabled, 1 =3D enabled)
Put 0 to disable defrag
------------------------------------------------------------ -------------=
-----
=FF=FEWindows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session =
Manager\Memory Management\PrefetchParameters]
"VideoInitTime"=3Ddword:00000172
"EnablePrefetcher"=3Ddword:00000002
"AppLaunchMaxNumPages"=3Ddword:00000fa0
"AppLaunchMaxNumSections"=3Ddword:000000aa
"AppLaunchTimerPeriod"=3Dhex:80,69,67,ff,ff,ff,ff,ff
"BootMaxNumPages"=3D
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Marshall Cabinet questions [message #72440 is a reply to message #72424] |
Fri, 15 September 2006 09:14 |
Tony Benson
Messages: 453
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
dword:0001f400
"BootMaxNumSections"=3Ddword:00000ff0
"BootTimerPeriod"=3Dhex:00,f2,d8,f8,ff,ff,ff,ff
"MaxNumActiveTraces"=3Ddword:00000008
"MaxNumSavedTraces"=3Ddword:00000008
"RootDirPath"=3D"Prefetch"
"HostingAppList"=3D"DLLHOST.EXE,MMC.EXE,RUNDLL32.EXE"
------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C6E379.A3D96840
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>John,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Those other things frighten me. =
I'll stick=20
with</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>the first one though.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"John" <<A href=3D"mailto:no@no.com">no@no.com</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A href=3D"news:451c6970@linux">news:451c6970@linux</A>...</DIV>Here's =
a few=20
more you might like. Control Panel / Display / Appearance <BR>/ =
Effects=20
/ "Use following method to smooth screen fonts" / Select Clear =
<BR>Type. =20
Makes fonts look much better.<BR><BR>Control Panel / Display / =
Appearance /=20
Advanced / Item / Icon / Change <BR>Font Size to 12. This =
changes=20
explorer font size and desktop icon size.<BR><BR>And attached are more =
registry thingies.<BR><BR>Enjoy.<BR>John<BR><BR>Tom Bruhl =
wrote:<BR>>=20
John,<BR>> <BR>> =
Saaaaahahahahahahaaaaaweeeeeeeeeet!<BR>> =20
<BR>> You have forever changed my life. Fewer bad<BR>> =
words will=20
come from my mouth regarding Mr. Gates<BR>> from this moment=20
on.<BR>> <BR>> Thank a big Ewe!<BR>> Tom<BR>> =20
<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> "John" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:no@no.com">no@no.com</A> <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:no@no.com">mailto:no@no.com</A>>> wrote in=20
message<BR>> <A=20
=
href=3D"news:451c386a@linux">news:451c386a@linux</A>...<BR>> &nbs=
p; =20
Oh, that's easy, from Windows Explorer, Pick "List View", =20
then<BR>> Tools =
/<BR>> =20
Folder Options / View Tab / Apply to all folders.<BR>>=20
<BR>> If you want My computer to default to =
2 pane=20
view: Tools / FOlder<BR>> Options / =
File=20
Types / Folder / Advanced / set Explore as Default.<BR>>=20
<BR>> =
Enjoy,<BR>> =20
John<BR>> <BR>> Tom Bruhl=20
wrote:<BR>> > Is there any way to =
have all=20
windows open up in list form<BR>> =
> rather=20
than defaulting to icons all the time? It drives=20
me<BR>> > crazy having to switch =
for the=20
last ten years of my life.<BR>> >=20
Tom<BR> > =2 0
><BR> > =2 0
><BR>> > I choose Polesoft =
Lockspam to=20
fight spam, and you?<BR>> > <A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A><BR>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>=FF=FEWindows Registry Editor Version=20
=
5.00<BR><BR> [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion \=
Explorer\Advanced]<BR>"EnableBalloonTips"=3Ddword:00000000 <BR><BR>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>=FF=FEWindows Registry Editor Version=20
=
5.00<BR><BR> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersio n=
\OptimalLayout]<BR>"LayoutFilePath"=3D"C:\\WINDOWS\\Prefetch\\Layout.ini "=
<BR>"EnableAutoLayout"=3Ddword:00000000<BR><BR>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>System Key:=20
=
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersio n\ <BR>Optimal=
Layout]<BR>Value=20
Name: EnableAutoLayout<BR>Data Type: REG_DWORD (DWORD Value)<BR>Value =
Data: (0=20
=3D disabled, 1 =3D enabled)<BR><BR><BR>Put 0 to disable defrag
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>=FF=FEWindows Registry Editor Version=20
=
5.00<BR><BR> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session =
Manager\Memory=20
=
Management\PrefetchParameters]<BR>"VideoInitTime"=3Ddword:00000172 <BR>"En=
ablePrefetcher"=3Ddword:00000002<BR>"AppLaunchMaxNumPages "=3Ddword:00000f=
a0<BR>"AppLaunchMaxNumSections"=3Ddword:000000aa<BR>"AppLaunchTimerPeriod=
"=3Dhex:80,69,67,ff,ff,ff,ff,ff<BR>"BootMaxNumPages"=3Ddword:0001f400 <BR>=
"BootMaxNumSections"=3Ddword:00000ff0<BR>"BootTimerPeriod "=3Dhex:00,f2,d8=
,f8,ff,ff,ff,ff<BR>"MaxNumActiveTraces"=3Ddword:00000008<BR >"MaxNumSavedT=
races"=3Ddword:00000008<BR>"RootDirPath"=3D"Prefetch"<BR >"HostingAppList"=
=3D"DLLHOST.EXE,MMC.EXE,RUNDLL32.EXE"<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE ></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C6E379.A3D96840--Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim W as "Oh
Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim. :o)
I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
Cheers,
Kim.or get you glasses updated.
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:39:09 -0400, John <no@no.com> wrote:
>Here's a few more you might like. Control Panel / Display / Appearance
>/ Effects / "Use following method to smooth screen fonts" / Select Clear
>Type. Makes fonts look much better.
>
>Control Panel / Display / Appearance / Advanced / Item / Icon / Change
>Font Size to 12. This changes explorer font size and desktop icon size.
>
>And attached are more registry thingies.
>
>Enjoy.
>John
>
>Tom Bruhl wrote:
>> John,
>>
>> Saaaaahahahahahahaaaaaweeeeeeeeeet!
>>
>> You have forever changed my life. Fewer bad
>> words will come from my mouth regarding Mr. Gates
>> from this moment on.
>>
>> Thank a big Ewe!
>> Tom
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Marshall Cabinet questions [message #72441 is a reply to message #72439] |
Fri, 15 September 2006 10:06 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>
>>
>>
>> "John" <no@no.com <mailto:no@no.com>> wrote in message
>> news:451c386a@linux...
>> Oh, that's easy, from Windows Explorer, Pick "List View", then
>> Tools /
>> Folder Options / View Tab / Apply to all folders.
>>
>> If you want My computer to default to 2 pane view: Tools / FOlder
>> Options / File Types / Folder / Advanced / set Explore as Default.
>>
>> Enjoy,
>> John
>>
>> Tom Bruhl wrote:
>> > Is there any way to have all windows open up in list form
>> > rather than defaulting to icons all the time? It drives me
>> > crazy having to switch for the last ten years of my life.
>> > Tom
>> >
>> >
>> > I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>> > http://www.polesoft.com/refer.htmlThanks for clearing that up, Kim.
At four in the morning, I didn't tweak to the fact that Deej
thought I was you, or you me....
Hope the new job is going well.
The other Kim
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim W as "Oh
>Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
>
>Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
>between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim. :o)
>
>I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.I'm trying to hang them sideways straight up and down.
"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>
>OK, here it is, but you gotta make me a couple for
>a finders fee... :-)
>
> http://guitarideas.net/shop/index.php?action=item&id=65& amp;prevaction=category&previd=5&prevstart=0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>I would think that would mar the finish on the neck.
>>
>>steve the artguy wrote:
>>> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>> Ok, I give up. I can't seem to find cam version on the internet. hmm
>>>
>>> John-
>>>
>>> I could make some out of some hard wood and a tablesaw/scrollsaw/nailfile
>>> or whatever. I think it would be nice to have them made of wood, actually.
>>> Just two circles mounted slightly off center would work. I could draw
>something
>>> up if you'd like... if I haven't made it suffficiently confusing...
>>>
>>> -steve
>A while back I was looking for a solution for this too.
I too was going to make my own hangers out of wood.
I pondered over designs and finally I decided
that I couldn't live with the idea of a bad piece of wood
breaking and droping my babies to the floor.
$12 a piece for a steel design seems pretty fair for piece of mind.
Also, I only screw them into studs and use 2" screws.
BrandonJust put some sheepskin on it
John <no@no.com> wrote:
>I would think that would mar the finish on the neck.
>
>steve the artguy wrote:
>> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>> Ok, I give up. I can't seem to find cam version on the internet. hmm
>>
>> John-
>>
>> I could make some out of some hard wood and a tablesaw/scrollsaw/nailfile
>> or whatever. I think it would be nice to have them made of wood, actually.
>> Just two circles mounted slightly off center would work. I could draw
something
>> up if you'd like... if I haven't made it suffficiently confusing...
>>
>> -steveNice--count me in for whatever...
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>I'm ready for something new that's for sure!
>Can't wait.
>Tom
>
> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message =
>news:451cac89$1@linux...
> fantastic!
> AA
>
> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message =
>news:451bc037$1@linux...
> >
> > Hi to all.
> > Thats good news for us Parisians.
> > Matt Craig has contacted me about his reverb and some other goodies
=
>!!!=20
> > and
> > he told me some things that are only good news.
> > I will leave it up to him to decide when an what to announce.
> > Happy Paris to everyone.
> > Regards,
> > Dimitrios=20
>
>
>
>
>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Marshall Cabinet questions [message #72445 is a reply to message #72441] |
Fri, 15 September 2006 13:20 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ives are
>>an option now, and a RAID 5 NAS unit is probably a better idea then keeping
>>everything locally anyway. The machine in question has two PCI slots and
>>one PCI-E.
>>
>>I'm 99% sure I'm going to do this, I'll keep people here posted.
>>
>>TCB
>>
>>"macle" <Mates9999@cs.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I don't want to bet against you. In fact, if it works out great,
>>>I'd probably copy you.
>>>
>>>I've been trying to figure out what to get for a new PC, and I
>>>find the whole thing very much a drag (if I were richer, I
>>>suppose I would get some overpriced pre-configured audio
>>>computer).
>>>
>>>Pro Tools has computer recommendations, and some Dell worksations are
listed,
>>>which end up being around $3500!
>>>
>>>How many PCI slots are there? I was thinking I would want to use
>>>the new computer for Paris as well as a native firewire setup,
>>>but now I'm thinking to screw that. So I'd really only need
>>>a slot for a UAD card I guess.
>>>
>>>Can you add 1 or 2 extra hard drives?
>>>
>>>
>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>How long ago was this? I used to shy away from some 'commodity' manufacturers
>>>>but when I look under the hood these days it looks like they're using
>nearly
>>>>identical core chipsets to the ASUS and Chaintechs of the world. The
differences
>>>>are in extras, gigabit networking, Promise SATA controllers, stuff like
>>>that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Maybe I'll test the theory. My old audio machine (an old Athlon box)
is
>>>in
>>>>bad shape. I was going to hold out for a fancy quad core but maybe I'll
>>>snap
>>>>up one of these Dells and see if I can make into an audio box.
>>>>
>>>>Anybody want to bet against me?
>>>>
>>>>TCB
>>>>
>>>>Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>I think it depends on the use and the model. We had a Dell for video
>>>>>editing at a previous job - tried to add a new video card to get a dual
>>>>>display and it caused nothing but headaches, but I attributed that to
>>a
>>>>>cheap motherboard more than anything (everything in this model was cheap/not
>>>>>industry standard).
>>>>>
>>>>>I built a custom system for them and it ran great.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you are mixing RME cards (or others even) and UAD-1s (then add firewire
>>>>>audio perhaps), I wouldn't go off the shelf and expect great results
>-
>>>>>motherboards are too fickle (e.g. you could get stuck with an chipset
>>that
>>>>>isn't going to work or a slow PCI buss, unless you go PCI-E, then it
>could
>>>>>be a toss up until you test it in practice). Otherwise, TI firewire,
>>DDR2,
>>>>>SATA, etc should be fine, unless you go SATA raid.... (may work fine
>in
>>>>>typical data storage, but with audio chipsets can be problematic if
you
>>>>run
>>>>>really high track counts).
>>>>>
>>>>>Dedric
>>>>>
>>>>>On 9/26/06 11:49 AM, in article 45196819$1@linux, "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Total crap. That's why I run a few hundred thousand dollars of Dell
>>gear
>>>>for
>>>>>> a living at work,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's an integrated nVidia AMD chipset, I'll bet you hash brownies
to
>>>hash
>>>>>> browns (or perl hashes) a TI firewire chip, DDR2 RAM, SATA drives.
>What's
>>>>>> missing? Maybe upgrade My audio cards are firewire, I have one UAD-1
>>>that
>>>>>> I'll have to replace soon anyway with a PCI-E card, and I'll need
it
>>>less
>>>>>> with the native f/x.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TCB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you think Dell would be a good DAW PC? I understand they're
>>>>>>> decent, but often not very robust.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Neil
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Beat this config for anything near the price.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/q7shy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TCB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>there are times when ancestral lineage plays an important role...i'm
just saying...you know...those people have a past...
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:10:32 -0600, "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>Hey..............for all I know you guys could be just toying with us
>here....wearing each other's clothes, swapping ID's,
>toothbrushes???........you name it. The implications boggle the mind. Now
>I'm paranoid. I need coffee................. or I will die.
>
>;o)
>
>
>"Kim W." <no-one@home.y'know> wrote in message news:451cddee$1@linux...
>>
>> Thanks for clearing that up, Kim.
>> At four in the morning, I didn't tweak to the fact that Deej
>> thought I was you, or you me....
>> Hope the new job is going well.
>> The other Kim
>>
>>
>> "Kim" <
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Marshall Cabinet questions [message #72448 is a reply to message #72445] |
Fri, 15 September 2006 15:13 |
Don Nafe
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ave =
>it up to=20
> him to decide when an what to announce.<BR>> Happy Paris to=20
> everyone.<BR>> Regards,<BR>> Dimitrios <BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
><DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
>and=20
>you?<BR><A=20
>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>Looking on the NVIDIA website, these cards only seem to have XP Drivers, true?
I'm trying to decide whether to go to XP or stay on 98. Except for large
HD support (>137GB), I can't see a reason to make the jump. This might be
one more reason.
My PARIS machine is dedicated to PARIS.
Rich Kelley
"Kim W" <no@way.com> wrote:
>
>OOPS!
>Try these for the PCI.
>Guess my copy/paste chops aren't up to it a 4am.
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/NVIDIA-64MB-PCI-Graphics-Card-Quadro-NVS 280-DDR_W0QQitemZ140032418162QQihZ004QQcategoryZ96877QQrdZ1Q QcmdZViewItem
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/PNY-NVIDIA-QUADRO-NVS-280-PCI-64MB-VCQ42 80NVS-PCI_W0QQitemZ110038297777QQihZ001QQcategoryZ64481QQrdZ 1QQcmdZViewItem
>
>>Lookie Here:
>>
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/Nvidia-Quadro-NVS-280-AGP-64mb-2x-4x-8x- Dual-Video_W0QQitemZ180032324096QQihZ008QQcategoryZ40161QQrd Z1QQcmdZViewItem
>>
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/Nvidia-Quadro-NVS-280-AGP-64mb-2x-4x-8x- Dual-Video_W0QQitemZ180032324980QQihZ008QQcategoryZ40161QQrd Z1QQcmdZViewItem
>>
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/NVIDIA-Quadro-NVS280-AGP-64mb-DDR-SDRAM- Excellent_W0QQitemZ260035231225QQihZ016QQcategoryZ40161QQrdZ 1QQcmdZViewItem
>>
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/NVIDIA-Quadro-NVS280-AGP-64mb-DDR-SDRAM- Excellent_W0QQitemZ260035231225QQihZ016QQcategoryZ40161QQrdZ 1QQcmdZViewItem
>>
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/NVIDIA-Quadro-NVS280-AGP-64mb-DDR-SDRAM- Excellent_W0QQitemZ260035231225QQihZ016QQcategoryZ40161QQrdZ 1QQcmdZViewItem
>>
>>Passive cooling, too. Nice and quiet.
>>
>>Kim
>>
>>"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>>>Kim,
>>>
>>>Could you get me the model #'s of those video cards when you get a chance?
>>>
>>>thanks, oh moderating one
>>>
>>>;o)
>>>
>>>"Kim W" <no@way.com> wrote in message news:451c10ca$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Hi, DJ.
>>>> They are the original Quadros. (NVS 280 I think..)
>>>> Would have to check. Got them some time ago on ebay for next to
>>>> nothing. These are/were available in PCI and AGP.
>>>> Yes, sluttage is good!
>>>> Kim
>>>>
>>>> "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>>>> >Ahhhh.....HA!!! ....sooooo....... you're using 4 monitors as well?
>I
>>>missed
>>>> >that. What kind of dual heads are you using? GEForce 5500's?
>>>> > BTW, your foray into wretched exess and componentry sluttage has made
>>me
>>>> >proud.
>>>> >
>>>> >;o)
>>>> >
>>>> >"Kim W" <no@way.com> wrote in message news:451bfec7$1@linux...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Hi John.
>>>> >> Never used a Magma. I reckon you could probably even get 5 EDS's
>>>> >> working, but I need 4 monitors, so one of the pci slots has a
>>>> >> Nvidia Quadro in it.
>>>> >> Kim
>>>> >>
>>>> >> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >No problems with IRQs? What fun is that? Is 4 the most Paris can
>>go
>>>> >before
>>>> >> >a Magma chassis is needed? So how are the IRQs on the Magma again
>>>with
>>>> >> 8
>>>> >> >eds cards? It has one PCI interface card that goes in the host
pc
>>and
>>>> it
>>>> >> >uses 2(?) irqs and the chassis shares those two across the 8 cards?
>>>> How
>>>> >> >does that work?
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >Thanks,
>>>> >> >John
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >"Kim W." <no@way.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>A bit hard to find these days, and a bit "old school", but they
>are
>>>> >still
>>>> >> >>out there.
>>>> >> >>Gigabyte K8NS Ultra 939. Works like a charm with XP and 4 EDS cards,
>>>> and
>>>> >> >>two dual-head Nvidia VGA's.
>>>> >> >>I Highly recommend it. No problems with IRQ's etc, just plug in
>>>> >> >>all cards, and install XP. Easy.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>Kim
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>"Steve L." <slavii@aol.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>>I am strongly considering building myself a new box and making
>the
>>>> >switch
>>>> >> >>>from 98 to xp. Is there a list of moterboards (or any other
>>>hardware)
>>>> >> >that
>>>> >> >>>works best in running paris on XP. I will only use this computer
>>to
>>>> >run
>>>> >> >>>Paris. And if I have a system with 2 eds cards, one mec, one
c16,
>>>> is
>>>> >> it
>>>> >> >>>worth it for me to switch to XP ?
>>>> >> >>> I rarely have projects with more than 32 tracks.
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>>Thanks,
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>>Steve L.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>"Nappy" <mgrant01@san.rr.com> wrote:
>
>Thanks Gene,
>Get back to us about the Liquid Mix,whats Duende?
>
>respect
>Nappy
The SSL C200 is an all-digital music production console that runs about $750,000,
and up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Marshall Cabinet questions [message #72487 is a reply to message #72425] |
Fri, 15 September 2006 23:32 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t; I did some testing and both multi pin cables are good and both
>> MECs
>> > >> >> >> get
>> > >> >> >> recognised individually by Card A but neither MEC is
>> > >> >> >> recognised
>> > >> >> > individually
>> > >> >> >> by Card B
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> Any ideas as to what is going on?
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> Don
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>What Gene said!
Very nice!
respect
Nappy
"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>>host, please check out:
>>
>>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>
>>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>
>>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
>pop
>>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>>the vibe is there. :o)
>>
>>Tell me what you think...
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Kim.
>
>
>Me like.
>I thought I would hear some Ausi-funk :-(
>Couldn’t get “Everything You Are” to play.
>Gene
>Hey Kim,
Cool stuff, I like it, it's different.
I'd like to hear it with a bit better blend in the mix, but it's very cool.
Cheers,
TCWow!
"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>>I'm afraid that if Logic Audio does do something Radical Soon (Winter
>Namm2007) there toast..<
>
>Apple wasn't even on the list of NAMM xhbitors, last I looked.
>
>
>"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:451e02f1$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi Jamie,
>> While I'm happy that Logic audio is still in existence, It's really losing
>> ground in the DAW market share, as well as Digital Performer. Hummm ....I
>> wonder why??
>>
>> Could it be that by closing it's door to the Windows platform, pretty
>sealed
>> their fate???
>>
>> Since Apple gave Intel-mac user's Boot-Camp, they should stop this charade
>> and go back to supporting Both Mac OSX and Windows.
>>
>> I Love Logic Audio, but when Mr Jobs closed it's doors for us Windows
>users,
>> I stopped using the product.
>> Now, it the Pro Audio production game, logic has lost a lot of it's
>luster.
>> Mac users are using Pro Tools 7x midi sequencer these days.
>> And, I still say that Logic's main problem is that their Programmers are
>> beholden to that 1994 GUI. By todays standards, it just does not play.
>Even
>> Cakewalk Sonar looks more profesional.! Yikes!! Man, what a F....in waste
>> in what is still thee best sequencer in the world..But, when you stop
>evolving,
>> you die.. I'm afraid that if Logic Audio does do something Radical Soon
>(Winter
>> Namm2007) there toast..
>>
>> Bright-Side: They are struck this monumental joint agreement with Apogee
>> with the those PCI-E cards and Firewire interface. Nice. Problem: Apogee
>> does not know how to write good drivers, at least firewire drivers.
>Soundtrack
>> Pro looks and runs and behaves like a modern pro DAW app should run. I
>hope
>> and proay that we are looking at the the Future of Logic Audio/via
>Soundtrack
>> Pro..Pleaseeee... :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/24742
>> >
>> >Finally. Doesn't matter for me (dual processor) but for those who have
>> >been using quad boxes this is a welcome update.
>> >
>> >Not that Logic is likely to out of juice on two processors, but I'm sure
>>
>> >it's fun to watch all the CPU meters moving. :^)
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> > -Jamie
>> > http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>
>Sounds great. A very big present sound, especially considering
how fast you did it, plus the MySpace encoding. I think your
ethic/method revolution is a great idea. I'm trying to figure
out something similar, partly why I may switch from Paris. But
your sound is so big and present, makes me think I shouldn't
switch!!
Great job, Kim.
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>host, please check out:
>
>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>the vibe is there. :o)
>
>Tell me what you think...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.From what I can recall, the average Aussie now drinks more wine than beer.
Gotta save those 'little creatures".
--
Martin Harrington
www.lendanear-sound.com
"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote in message news:451e9484$1@linux...
> Crikey! Actually, I'd probably fit right in with the fauna. When I was a
> kid, I had a minizoo with snakes, alligators, turtles aanything else I
> could
> catch in the local billabong. I did stop drinking over 15 years ago. Can I
> be an honorary Aussie and not drink beer? I suppose there may be other
> kinds
> of *little creatures* you could bring to a pub, but ingesting them might
> cause problems/get you arrested.
>
> ;o)
>
> "Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> news:451e1bb2$1@linux...
>> Deej,
>> I hereby bequeath upon you, the title of "HONOURARY AUSTRALIAN"
>> --
>> Martin Harrington
>> www.lendanear-sound.com
>>
>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:451dfe0f$1@linux...
>> >
>> > "Kim W." <no@way.com> wrote:
>> >>Kenoath!!
>> >>(I speak for both us Kims)
>> >
>> > ROTLF!! Indeed he does. ;o)
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Kim.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>Kim W
>> >>
>> >>"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>> >>>I was wondering what that Holden was doing in my driveway and why I've
>> > been
>> >>>referring to gasoline as being "petrol" lately.
>> >>>Well, at least I have been paying fewer pence for it lately. If I'm
> you,
>> >>>then I can say cool stuff like "stone the crows" and it will be OK,
>> >>>right?
>> >>>
>> >>>;O)
>> >>>
>> >>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>>news:451deecc$1@linux...
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Well I have no idea what Kim W looks like, as we have never been in
> the
>> >>>same
>> >>>> room together at the same time to my knowledge...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ...hmm, never been seen in the same room at the same time eh? Hmm...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ...though I am also about 5'9" and my hair these days somewhat
>> >>>"cueball'esque"...
>> >>>> so perhaps we are the same person. I hear we've never been seen in
>> > the
>> >>>> same room at the same time either... ;o)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ...though if we are the same person, who was I talking to on the
> phone
>> >>the
>> >>>> other week... ...maybe my medication isn't working... ;o)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ...and where the hell did I put those distressors?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ;o)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers,
>> >>>> Kim.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>> >>>> >Well, I've met Doug Wellington and he's about 6'4". I'm 5'9". He
> also
>> >>has
>> >>>> >hair down to his waist and I'm cueball'esque so there wouldn't be
> much
>> >>in
>> >>>> >the way of mistaking us for each other........oh yeah........he's
>> >>>*really*
>> >>>> >incredibly-as in genius level, smart as well so there's another
>> >>>> >dissimilarity. I'm not going to start talking about clothes,
>> >>>toothbrushes,
>> >>>> >etc. That's too gross. where'd you get that stuff anyway?
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >;o)
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>>news:451de552$1@linux...
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >Yeah, OK, but are you really Kim.........or are you Kim?
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Well that is the question. And are you Deej? And who is this
> Animix
>> >>>fellow
>> >>>> >> who was posting a while back... and this guy Doug, how does he
> fit
>> >>>into
>> >>>> >> the picture? And do Doug Wellington's clothes fit this Animix
>> >>>> >> guy?
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> All these questions and more... ;o)
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Cheers,
>> >>>> >> Kim.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >;o)
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>>> >news:451da750$1@linux...
>> >>>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >> "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >> >If I don't have whatever this is, I will die.
>> >>>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >> Hehe, it's an oldie, but it still made me LOL. ;o)
>> >>>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >> ...because I know it's true. ;o)
>> >>>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >> Cheers,
>> >>>> >> >> Kim.
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
>"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>I wish I had some big bass drivers in the back and a 1000W
>power amp.
Hehe. There's a Juno-60 doing the bass for most of it. When I first designed
my main bass sound and did a mix in the studio, I mixed on my main system,
but then did my final mix test, as I do, on my little wee computer monitors,
just to check that the final MP3 was going to sound half decent on Joe Average's
home computer, when I found I could hear almost no bass. Turns out the frequency
was just too low. Had to stick a big boost in at 250k or something to get
some upper harmonics happening...
....but put that baby on some nice subs and you'll hear the root and sub
oscillators. Mmm... Juno-60... ;o)
Cheers,
Kim.TC <tc@spammetodeathyoubastards.org> wrote:
>I'd like to hear it with a bit better blend in the mix, but it's very cool.
Some of it certainly wants a proper mix process to take place. Basically,
with a couple of exceptions, the process to date has simply been record it,
edit it, and bounce it. Basic effects have been added, but there's almost
no eq on anything, and even actual levels are quite rough for the most part.
I will certainly go back and take a look at that at some point.
Thanks for the feedback. :o)
Cheers,
Kim.
>
>Cheers,
>
>TC"macle" <Mates9999@cs.com> wrote:
>Sounds great. A very big present sound, especially considering
>how fast you did it, plus the MySpace encoding.
Gee thanks. I must say I'm very happy with the sound myself.
To let out a little secret, my method has a slightly dodgy side, in that
all the audio runs through two Akai MB-76 "audio mix bays" before getting
to the system, which are busy in there adding noise and reducing clarity.
These things are way cool as they let me just press a footswitch and, for
arguments sake, patch my Juno-60 into my ol' school guitar footpedals, or
into my Quadraverb, or both, or into the GNX-4, or into all three, in whatever
combo I like, and then do the same for the digi piano or for the EPS. It's
way cool functionality wise because I can get any sound I'm likely to want
without any manual patches taking place...
....but I was kinda worried that it would take some sheen off the sound,
so your comments are very much appreciated. :o)
And I'm loving the method. In terms of speed, efficiency, inspiration, and
just sheer fun, it's the best thing since, err... actually I'm struggling
to think of something better. ;o) Paris? ;o)
Cheers,
Kim.
>I think your
>ethic/method revolution is a great idea. I'm trying to figure
>out something similar, partly why I may switch from Paris. But
>your sound is so big and present, makes me think I shouldn't
>switch!!
>
>Great job, Kim.
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>>host, please check out:
>>
>>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>
>>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>
>>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
>pop
>>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>>the vibe is there. :o)
>>
>>Tell me what you think...
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Kim.
>"Nappy" <mgrant01@san.rr.com> wrote:
>
>What Gene said!
>Very nice!
Thanks heaps. :o)
Cheers,
Kim.
>
>respect
>Nappy
>
>
>"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>>>host, please check out:
>>>
>>>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>>
>>>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>>>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
recorded
>>>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>>>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>>
>>>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get
a
>>pop
>>>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>>>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>>>the vibe is there. :o)
>>>
>>>Tell me what you think...
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Kim.
>>
>>
>>Me like.
>>I thought I would hear some Ausi-funk :-(
>>Couldn’t get “Everything You Are” to play.
>>Gene
>>
>Heh. Yeah, they sit out NAMM sometimes. Apple didn't exhibit at Winter
NAMM when I covered it for MacWEEk a zillion years ago. I dinged 'em for
it in the mag. The director of music marketing over there was a bit
miffed. Whatever.
Fact is, Logic has had several updates this year already, including
fixing some moldy bugs that HAD to go. It has finally gotten to the
point where I can actually recommend it.
The feature set is deep and, frankly, amazing. The included collection
of usable and good to great sounding plugins is much appreciated. On a
dual G5 it's very efficient and capable of way more tracks, FX and soft
synths than even my most overproduced excess would need. The current
improvements in stability makes it a workhorse around here. The support
for both Intel and PowerPC Macs will be extra nice when I get a fast
Intel Mac laptop in a few months (holding out for the 64 bit chip).
Now that Logic supports the quad boxes, it's just showing off. Naturally
there are a few more things the Logic team can do to improve it here and
there, but rumors of its demise are more than a bit premature, folks.
Taking nothing away from the other programs which have also been
improving lately - and good thing, too.
Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
LaMont wrote:
> Wow!
> "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>>> I'm afraid that if Logic Audio does do something Radical Soon (Winter
>> Namm2007) there toast..<
>>
>> Apple wasn't even on the list of NAMM xhbitors, last I looked.
>>
>>
>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:451e02f1$1@linux...
>>> Hi Jamie,
>>> While I'm happy that Logic audio is still in existence, It's really losing
>>> ground in the DAW market share, as well as Digital Performer. Hummm ....I
>>> wonder why??
>>>
>>> Could it be that by closing it's door to the Windows platform, pretty
>> sealed
>>> their fate???
>>>
>>> Since Apple gave Intel-mac user's Boot-Camp, they should stop this charade
>>> and go back to supporting Both Mac OSX and Windows.
>>>
>>> I Love Logic Audio, but when Mr Jobs closed it's doors for us Windows
>> users,
>>> I stopped using the product.
>>> Now, it the Pro Audio production game, logic has lost a lot of it's
>> luster.
>>> Mac users are using Pro Tools 7x midi sequencer these days.
>>> And, I still say that Logic's main problem is that their Programmers are
>>> beholden to that 1994 GUI. By todays standards, it just does not play.
>> Even
>>> Cakewalk Sonar looks more profesional.! Yikes!! Man, what a F....in waste
>>> in what is still thee best sequencer in the world..But, when you stop
>> evolving,
>>> you die.. I'm afraid that if Logic Audio does do something Radical Soon
>> (Winter
>>> Namm2007) there toast..
>>>
>>> Bright-Side: They are struck this monumental joint agreement with Apogee
>>> with the those PCI-E cards and Firewire interface. Nice. Problem: Apogee
>>> does not know how to write good drivers, at least firewire drivers.
>> Soundtrack
>>> Pro looks and runs and behaves like a modern pro DAW app should run. I
>> hope
>>> and proay that we are looking at the the Future of Logic Audio/via
>> Soundtrack
>>> Pro..Pleaseeee... :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>>> http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/24742
>>>>
>>>> Finally. Doesn't matter for me (dual processor) but for those who have
>>>> been using quad boxes this is a welcome update.
>>>>
>>>> Not that Logic is likely to out of juice on two processors, but I'm sure
>>>> it's fun to watch all the CPU meters moving. :^)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> -Jamie
>>>> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>Very enjoyable tunes, not to mention filled with great advice!
The GNX4 has also been an inspirational composing tool here, too. I've
written a number of new songs for my solo show that I multi-track live
on stage. Way fun!
Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
Kim wrote:
> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
> host, please check out:
>
> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a pop
> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
> the vibe is there. :o)
>
> Tell me what you think...
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.Thanks for the comments.
One thing I've learned about the GNX-4, compared to either the GNX3 or the
BNX3, is that it's actually slightly inferior for live looping. On all four
of them, when you are running a loop, you can simply depress the play button
on the unit and it will return to the start of the loop. On the B/GNX-3 this
is an excellent tool live for keeping in sync with a band, as it allows you
to resync the loop at the start of the bar, however unfortunately the GNX-4
has a horrible almost random delay in it when you press play, so if you try
and resync the loop using this method it will end up out of time. On the
B/GNX-3 the response is instant, but on the 4 it's not, rendering the feature
fairly useless.
I suspect it's because the 3 series have onboard memory where I'm suspicious
the "working loops" are stored while in operation. The 4 I think works directly
of the CF card and hence communications is a little slower. I've been meaning
to write to digitech about it in the hope that they can fix it in a firmware
update, but I'm not holding my breath. If you get a moment perhaps you could/should
do the same. The ability to resync the loops in a live scenario would be,
well I don't have to tell you how useful it would be. ;o)
But it's a great tool none the less, and I'm loving it. :o)
Cheers,
Kim.
Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>
>Very enjoyable tunes, not to mention filled with great advice!
>
>The GNX4 has also been an inspirational composing tool here, too. I've
>written a number of new songs for my solo show that I multi-track live
>on stage. Way fun!
>
>Cheers,
> -Jamie
> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>Kim wrote:
>> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>> host, please check out:
>>
>> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>
>> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
recorded
>> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>
>> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get
a pop
>> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>> the vibe is there. :o)
>>
>> Tell me what you think...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kim.Hey Jamie,
I can feel your un-dying love and loyalty to Logic.:) However, I'm only stating
my opinion from the trenches from both small and large studios.
When you talk to producers or programmers today and ask about Logic audio,
they all answer with "Yeah, I know Logic is cool, BUT....Always the But..
They, Logic are on an deserted Island these days. Not supporting the Windows
Platform was a major mistake. And I'm affraid, that If Apple does not change
it's course Sooooooon, Logic will go the way of Studio Vision and so will
Digital Performer.
Unless Apple starts packaging Logic Pro with every dual Mac(thrown in), I
cant really see them making any market penatration.
Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>
>Heh. Yeah, they sit out NAMM sometimes. Apple didn't exhibit at Winter
>NAMM when I covered it for MacWEEk a zillion years ago. I dinged 'em for
>it in the mag. The director of music marketing over there was a bit
>miffed. Whatever.
>
>Fact is, Logic has had several updates this year already, including
>fixing some moldy bugs that HAD to go. It has finally gotten to the
>point where I can actually recommend it.
>
>The feature set is deep and, frankly, amazing. The included collection
>of usable and good to great sounding plugins is much appreciated. On a
>dual G5 it's very efficient and capable of way more tracks, FX and soft
>synths than even my most overproduced excess would need. The current
>improvements in stability makes it a workhorse around here. The support
>for both Intel and PowerPC Macs will be extra nice when I get a fast
>Intel Mac laptop in a few months (holding out for the 64 bit chip).
>
>Now that Logic supports the quad boxes, it's just showing off. Naturally
>there are a few more things the Logic team can do to improve it here and
>there, but rumors of its demise are more than a bit premature, folks.
>
>Taking nothing away from the other programs which have also been
>improving lately - and good thing, too.
>
>Cheers,
> -Jamie
> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>LaMont wrote:
>> Wow!
>> "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>>>> I'm afraid that if Logic Audio does do something Radical Soon (Winter
>>> Namm2007) there toast..<
>>>
>>> Apple wasn't even on the list of NAMM xhbitors, last I looked.
>>>
>>>
>>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:451e02f1$1@linux...
>>>> Hi Jamie,
>>>> While I'm happy that Logic audio is still in existence, It's really
losing
>>>> ground in the DAW market share, as well as Digital Performer. Hummm
....I
>>>> wonder why??
>>>>
>>>> Could it be that by closing it's door to the Windows platform, pretty
>>> sealed
>>>> their fate???
>>>>
>>>> Since Apple gave Intel-mac user's Boot-Camp, they should stop this charade
>>>> and go back to supporting Both Mac OSX and Windows.
>>>>
>>>> I Love Logic Audio, but when Mr Jobs closed it's doors for us Windows
>>> users,
>>>> I stopped using the product.
>>>> Now, it the Pro Audio production game, logic has lost a lot of it's
>>> luster.
>>>> Mac users are using Pro Tools 7x midi sequencer these days.
>>>> And, I still say that Logic's main problem is that their Programmers
are
>>>> beholden to that 1994 GUI. By todays standards, it just does not play.
>>> Even
>>>> Cakewalk Sonar looks more profesional.! Yikes!! Man, what a F....in
waste
>>>> in what is still thee best sequencer in the world..But, when you stop
>>> evolving,
>>>> you die.. I'm afraid that if Logic Audio does do something Radical Soon
>>> (Winter
>>>> Namm2007) there toast..
>>>>
>>>> Bright-Side: They are struck this monumental joint agreement with Apogee
>>>> with the those PCI-E cards and Firewire interface. Nice. Problem: Apogee
>>>> does not know how to write good drivers, at least firewire drivers.
>>> Soundtrack
>>>> Pro looks and runs and behaves like a modern pro DAW app should run.
I
>>> hope
>>>> and proay that we are looking at the the Future of Logic Audio/via
>>> Soundtrack
>>>> Pro..Pleaseeee... :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>>>> http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/24742
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally. Doesn't matter for me (dual processor) but for those who have
>>>>> been using quad boxes this is a welcome update.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not that Logic is likely to out of juice on two processors, but I'm
sure
>>>>> it's fun to watch all the CPU meters moving. :^)
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> -Jamie
>>>>> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>
>>Hey Kim,
I like it. good for you. I want to sound like me too, only more interesting
indeed.
best
DCI used to drink Fosters in another life..........those big litre steel cans.
Man, those things got soooooo rank with the metallic aftertaste once they
had been chilled and then warmed up a bit........which was always a good
excuse to drink 'em quick.
Yikes!!! ;o)
"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:451eef22$1@linux...
> From what I can recall, the average Aussie now drinks more wine than beer.
> Gotta save those 'little creatures".
> --
> Martin Harrington
> www.lendanear-sound.com
>
> "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote in message news:451e9484$1@linux...
> > Crikey! Actually, I'd probably fit right in with the fauna. When I was a
> > kid, I had a minizoo with snakes, alligators, turtles aanything else I
> > could
> > catch in the local billabong. I did stop drinking over 15 years ago. Can
I
> > be an honorary Aussie and not drink beer? I suppose there may be other
> > kinds
> > of *little creatures* you could bring to a pub, but ingesting them might
> > cause problems/get you arrested.
> >
> > ;o)
> >
> > "Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> > news:451e1bb2$1@linux...
> >> Deej,
> >> I hereby bequeath upon you, the title of "HONOURARY AUSTRALIAN"
> >> --
> >> Martin Harrington
> >> www.lendanear-sound.com
> >>
> >> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:451dfe0f$1@linux...
> >> >
> >> > "Kim W." <no@way.com> wrote:
> >> >>Kenoath!!
> >> >>(I speak for both us Kims)
> >> >
> >
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Marshall Cabinet questions [message #72581 is a reply to message #72445] |
Sun, 17 September 2006 19:10 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
dy..An even better example of the level of
>> audio
>>>>>>> editing,
>>>>>>> look and feel that Logic shouold be heading towards. Well, it looks
>> like
>>>>>>> Apple is heading there without them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I heard a rumor that most of the German(emagic)team is not leading
>> the
>>>>> Logic
>>>>>>> Audio development team. That it's all Apple developers? Is this true?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/quicktours/?quicktours/a udio/qt_stpro_2
>>>>>>> _re
>>>>>>> storation
>>Anyone using a ASUS A8N-SLi N Force4 motherboard with PARIS?
Any comments welcome.
respect
NappyOk then,
My nudge increments and Sampleslide presets are as follows with the buffers
set to 512 on my audio machine
For buffer latency compensation nudge 10 + 1 left and then apply 48 samples
in Sampleslide.
For one UAD-1 plugin nudge 10 + 1 + 50 and then apply 818 samples in
Sampleslide
For two UAD-1 plugins nudge 10 + 1 + 100 and the apply 1588 samples in
Sampleslide
For three UAD-1 plugins nudge 10 + 1 + 100 + 50 and then apply 2358 samples
in Sampleslide
For four UAD-1 plugins nudge 10 + 1 + 100 + 100 and then apply 3128 samples
in Sampleslide
That's as many as I've ever used on a track so far. This has not been
measured by bouncing and comparing the files yet. It is strictly my ears
listening for flamming/phasing but it sounds *very* tight on my rig.
As far as routing to auxes is concerned, that going to take some serious
explaining and will take me a while to type it up. I don't have the time
right now but I'll try to get to it tonight. It will only work in Cubase SX
in version 3 with external hardware, but VST hardware should be able to be
applied as a send effect in Cubase Sx to the Paris track you're processing
in Cubase. I'll get to it when I have a bit ot *typing time* It will also
likely involve nudging the Paris track and compensating with Sampleslide as
well on the track you're processing. I'll have to check.
Stay tuned,
Deej
"Chris Lang" <yo@yo.yo> wrote in message news:452141e4$1@linux...
>
> Thanks in advance DJ, whenever you get around to it.
>
> I have the tools you mention, but have not even come close
> to using them simultaneously.
>
> peace,
>
> Chris
>
> "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
> >No sweat...
> >
> >
> >"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote in message news:4521045d@linux...
> >> I'll have to get back to this thread tonight.Today's already the Monday
>
> >> from
> >> hell and it's only 6:00 AM.
> >>
> >> ;o)
> >>
> >> "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:4520ff8c@linux...
> >>> Hey DJ
> >>>
> >>> Could you walk us idiots through the process i.e. "assign a pair of
I/O
>
> >>> to
> >>> the aux/send return" etc
> >>>
> >>> for example what modules in the paris patch bay are used to do this
and
> >>> exactly how are they routed...
> >>>
> >>> I realise this is second nature to you, but as you found out on Sunday
> >> some
> >>> of us (especially me) are still new to/or intimidated by the paris
patch
> >>> bay and the relationship of all it's components to each other....make
> >> sense?
> >>>
> >>> If you would, just post this "paris patchbay for dummies" with your
> >> latest
> >>> latency findings
> >>>
> >>> It would be greatly appreciated
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> DOn
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote in message news:4520b451@linux...
> >>> >I created some sampleslide presets to work with the nudge increments
> for
> >>> >the
> >>> > UAD-1 plugins and I've got a sweet mix happening here with Paris
tracks
> >>> > being processed in SX, while others are being processed with EDS FX
> and
> >>> > yet
> >>> > others are being processed with outboard gear.
> >>> >
> >>> > Cubase SX is humming along just like a big ol' effects rack and
> >>> > everything
> >>> > sounds appropriately PHAT!!!
> >>> >
> >>> > I'm liking this. Much easier than rendering all the tracks, flying
> them
> >>> > into
> >>> > Cubase SX and mixing by streaming every track back through Paris.
Just
>
> >>> > a
> >>> > matter of a few presets in Sampleslide and a small nudge here and
> >>> > there.
> >>> > Being able to spread those outboard reverbs across submixes is very
> >> handy.
> >>> >
> >>> > I'll post up my Sampleslide presets ASAP. Theyre working very well.
> >>> >
> >>> > On that note......I'm off to St Mattress cathedral.
> >>> >
> >>> > G'nite all.
> >>> >
> >>> > ;o)
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>>
> As far as routing to auxes is concerned, that going to take some serious
> explaining and will take me a while to type it up. I don't have the time
> right now but I'll try to get to it tonight. It will only work in Cubase
> SX
> in version 3 with external hardware, but VST hardware should be able to be
> applied as a send effect in Cubase Sx to the Paris track you're processing
> in Cubase. I'll get to it when I have a bit ot *typing time* It will also
> likely involve nudging the Paris track and compensating with Sampleslide
> as
> well on the track you're processing. I'll have to check.
>
> Stay tuned,
>
> Deej
Take your time Deej.
Don
ps. just pretend you're talking to me when you write up the routing scenario
;-)http://www.sonalksis.com/index.php?section_id=99Well, I know Mark Altekruse, he is now Sr. Marketing manager for Apple Audio,
he was national sales manager for Korg USA, and has worked in the industry
for years. So I think they have a lot of good industry guys working over
their now.
Will they take PT, I doubt it, but anything is possible. Will it compete
on a professional level? I think it already does, and it will only get better.
James
"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
>"It took apple time to get the right people in place for
>the internal Logic team, some people came from Opcode. I think Logic will
>now improve. "
>
>And Roland & Former Sonic Foundry Developers. Hence, SounTrack(Opcode vison
>sleekness), apple loops(Acid), guitar sim(Roland Cosm_.. Now, that's a winning
>combination. I'm loving Apple's diversity in getting the "best" people from
>different Audio manufactuers, then developing a Killer Post/DAW .. :) Now,
>they have Apogee, Final Cut Pro, they have the Machines Dual Cores Macs.
>Nothing should prevent them (Apple) from becoming thee pre-eminent DAW player,
>thus over taking Digidesign..
>
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hey Dedric! I have older versions of Logic, but I'm not running Logic
at
>>this time. I have kept up with, to some degree, the development of logic.
>> I've been reading the Logic NG for some time, and a lot of the bugs have
>>been fixed. There was a lot of mad Logic users for a while, especially
>when
>>they started to make changes to the interface. Some people liked it the
>>way it was, hummmmm!
>>
>>I've just been reading about Logic and Symphony. It looks like a killer
>>combination, but time wil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Marshall Cabinet questions [message #72743 is a reply to message #72726] |
Tue, 19 September 2006 17:04 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
m> wrote in message news:451de55b$1@linux...
>>> >
>>> > Here's a couple more:
>>> >
>>> > Rolling Stones: It's only rock and roll
>>> >
>>> > acoustic 10 o clock electric 1 right rhythm
>>> > electric 2 right lead
>>> >
>>> > electric 3 left electric 4 right
>>> >
>>> > 5 freaking guitars !!
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Neil Young........Old Man
>>> >
>>> > Guitar panned 90% left
>>> > Vocal center, more verb in right
>>> > Bass center
>>> > Piano center very quiet
>>> >
>>> > banjo comes in left
>>> > slide guitar with nice reverb center mono
>>> >
>>> > Stereo vocal harmonies
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Share your own !! Thanks
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>>> >http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>>> >
>>> ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
>>> ><HTML><HEAD>
>>> ><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>>> >charset=3Diso-8859-1">
>>> ><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
>>> ><STYLE></STYLE>
>>> ></HEAD>
>>> ><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
>>> ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>John,</FONT></DIV>
>>> ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Try Hotel California. I think =
>>> >there are=20
>>> >between 11 and 13 different</FONT></DIV>
>>> ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>guitar parts/sounds </FONT><FONT =
>>> >face=3DArial=20
>>> >size=3D2>on that by the end but no clutter. </FONT></DIV>
>>> ><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
>>> ><BLOCKQUOTE=20
>>> >style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>>> >BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
>>> > <DIV>"John" <<A href=3D"mailto:no@no.com">no@no.com</A>> wrote =
>>> >in message=20
>>> > <A =
>>>
>>>href=3D"news:451de55b$1@linux">news:451de55b$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>Here=
>>> >'s a=20
>>> > couple more:<BR><BR>Rolling Stones: It's only rock and=20
>>> > roll<BR><BR>acoustic 10 o clock electric 1 right rhythm<BR>electric
>2
>>> =
>>> >right=20
>>> > lead<BR><BR>electric 3 left electric 4 right<BR><BR>5 freaking guitars
>>> =
>>> >
>>> > !!<BR><BR><BR><BR>Neil Young........Old Man<BR><BR>Guitar panned 90%=20
>>> > left<BR>Vocal center, more verb in right<BR>Bass center<BR>Piano =
>>> >center very=20
>>> > quiet<BR><BR>banjo comes in left<BR>slide guitar with nice reverb
=
>>> >center=20
>>> > mono<BR><BR>Stereo vocal harmonies<BR><BR><BR>Share your own !! =20
>>> >Thanks</BLOCKQUOTE>
>>> ><DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam,
>=
>>> >and=20
>>> >you?<BR><A=20
>>>
>>>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>>> >.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>I am considering getting the API eq. Any comments on the quality of these
plugs and how resource hungry they are would be appreciated.
ThanksLook for Arvid Solvang on the Apogee site www.apogeedigital.com/users/
Former PARIS and Logic PC user. Now using a MAC(this for LaMont)
respect
Nappy
"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>I was just looking at the Nuendo-post newsgroup and who should turn up there
>but Max Howarth.
>The oldies of the NG will remember him...he had a few Paris setups in his
>production facility in Edinburgh I think writing jingles and posting
>commercial spots
>Looks like he is Nuendo now....
>Wondered where he got to....
>
>www.redfacilities.com
>
>--
>Martin Harrington
>www.lendanear-sound.com
>
>Thanks Scott,
Spoken like a father with a young girl to raise!
By the way how is the family?
respect
Nappy
"scotth" <fresnelmusic@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>ya know.. I don post much on here anymore... and usually when I do .. it
is
>on a serious topic...but I will make an exception here....that all being
>said....
>
>
>CHUBBY? you call her... CHUBBY?
>
>what kind of anorexicolsentwinsnicoleritchiebagabones standard are you looking
>for?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"justcron" <justcron@hydrorecords.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Neil" <OIOIU@I.com> wrote in message news:45248c5a$1@linux...
>>>
>>> "justcron" <justcron@hydrorecords.com> wrote:
>>>>Sometimes a song just kills me. Garth Brooks - The Dance for example.
>>>>Here's the latest:
>>>> http://www.megamart.us/cma/Rascal_Flatts_with_Kelly_Clarkson _-_What_Hurts_The_Most_(ACM)_-_videopimp.mpg
>>>
>
>
>
>>> When Kelly Clarkson is at her best - like on the studio version
>>> of "Sunce U Been Gone", she fuckin' rocks solid and is one of
>>> the best female singers out there... but otherwise (like in
>>> this video) she come across as just another chubby chick with a
>>> microphone.
>>
>>Cool. I haven't really checked out much of her work. I thought she had
>a
>>couple badass songs I've been exposed to. I seriously loved her duet
with
>
>>RF. Definitely chubby but I thought her timing on the beat was killer.
>
>>
>>
>I just tried the 33609 comp. It's nice and very
*analog/hardware'ish/colored* but I don't think I'll die without it.....but
then again, I've got 14 days to fool around with it now so who knows?
;o)
"gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSP.com> wrote in message news:451033f0$1@linux...
>
> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Gene,
> >I have a stereo pair of Distressors and a Demeter VTCL-2
> >tube comp. I don't think either of these comps are right
> >for stereo bus work at the mastering level. Is your
> >experience with the UAD Mastering series plugs less=20
> >fruitful than my hardware options? I really don't want to
> >buy a hardware mastering comp.
> >Tom
> >
>
> It's not easy for me to answer. In my case I do apply "mastering" to
tracks
> if I am sending demos out or occasionally for film work. I do not consider
> myself a Mastering Engineer (capitalized), even though I do have a few
mastering
> credits. For real album work I send tracks to professional mastering
people.
> For me the goal is to get the tracks closer to "album sound" but not to do
> real mastering.
> If I did not have the Portico, I would probably pick the UAD 33609 over
the
> UAD Mastering Compressor simply because I have a slight preference for the
> "Neve-ish" sound.
> The best thing is to try the demos yourself. I do agree that the
Distressor
> is not a good choice for a mastering comp. It's been years since I used a
> Demeter.
>
> Other good software compressor/limiters I have used for "mastering"
include:
> Sony Dynamics and Limiter
> Massey Limiter (Pro tools only) - Excellent! And cheap.
> The optional limiter for SawStudio (I forget the name)
> Waves L3 Multimaximizer (gets crunchy but is very "Radio")
> UAD Fairchild (for effect only)
>
> A step down but usable are:
> PSP MasterComp, Voxengo, and Roger Nichols Finis
> GeneAnybody used this? I'm thinking of it as a direct box for practicing and such.
Opinions?
TCBdefinatley useable.
On 7 Oct 2006 03:14:18 +1000, "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>Anybody used this? I'm thinking of it as a direct box for practicing and such.
>Opinions?
>
>TCBnice sounding and somewhere between napoleon and bush as far as the
power hungry thing goes.
actually combining more than one of them on a channel can produce some
really nice q's. you might want to try the eliosound eq as well.
On 7 Oct 2006 01:59:26 +1000, "Gary Flanigan"
<gary_flanigan@ce9.uscourts.gov> wrote:
>
>I am considering getting the API eq. Any comments on the quality of these
>plugs and how resource hungry they are would be appreciated.
>
>ThanksI should know in a couple of weeks, it's included in my Komplete update,
supposedly shipping mid-month.
I'll be evaluating whether there might be any advantages to using GR2
instead of the GNX4 at some live solo shows - I'm curious if the looping
is more flexible.
If the guitar amp/cab models are on par with those included with Logic,
it should be more than fine for practicing. You might even be tempted to
drag a laptop to gigs...
Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
TCB wrote:
> Anybody used this? I'm thinking of it as a direct box for practicing and such.
> Opinions?
>
> TCBHey TCB,
Have you checked out the Toneport's from Line6?
I purchased the 2-port (UX2) which has really worked out nicely. It has guitar
amp/cab, bass amp/cab, mic pre, and microphone modeling and is compatible
with the Line6 add-on packs.
Quite a good deal for the money, IMHO.
Best wishes!
Mark
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>Anybody used this? I'm thinking of it as a direct box for practicing and
such.
>Opinions?
>
>TCBThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---=_linux45269583
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
These work for me......
---=_linux45269583
Content-Type: image/bmp; name="D:\Paris bitmap project\Paris bitmaps - grey 88 (original style - white square buttons)\MIXERAUX.bmp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="MIXERAUX.bmp"
Qk360AQAAAAAADYAAAAoAAAAngAAAJcCAAABABgAAAAAAMTQBAATCwAAEwsA
AAAAAAAAAAAAcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxAABqamoAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXEAAGlpaQAAAEtLS1dXV1paWl9fX1paWldXV1VVVVNT
U1RUVFNTU1NTU1JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlFRUVFRUVFR
UVBQUFBQUE9PT05OTk1NTU1NTU1NTU1NTUxMTEtLS0tLS0tLS0pKSkpKSkpK
SkpKSklJSUhISEdHR0dHR0ZGRkZGRkVFRURERERERERERENDQ0JCQkJCQkFB
QUFBQUFBQUFBQUBAQD8/Pz8/Pz4+Pj4+Pj4+Pj09PTs7Ozs7Ozo6Ojo6Ojk5
OTc3NzU1NTMzMzAwMCwsLCoqKikpKSUlJXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcQAAa2tr
AAAAT09PWVlZW1tbX19fWlpaV1dXVVVVU1NTVFRUVFRUU1NTUlJSUlJSUlJS
UlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUVFRUVFRUFBQT09PT09PTk5OTU1NTU1N
TU1NTU1NTExMS0tLS0tLS0tLSkpKSkpKSkpKSkpKSUlJSEhISEhIR0dHRkZG
RkZGRUVFREREREREREREQ0NDQkJCQkJCQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQEBAPz8/Pz8/
Pj4+Pj4+Pj4+PT09Ozs7Ozs7Ojo6Ojo6OTk5Nzc3NTU1MzMzMDAwLCwsKioq
KSkpJSUlcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFx
cXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxcXFxAABubm4AAABWVlZiYmJjY2NoaGhiYmJf
X19eXl5bW1tcXFxbW1tbW1tbW1tbW1taWlpaWlpaWlpaWlpaWlpaWlpaWlpZ
WVlZWVlYWFhYWFhYWFhXV1dWVlZVVVVVVVVVVVVUVFRTU1NTU1NSUlJSUlJR
UVFRUVFRUVFRUVFPT09PT09PT09NTU1NTU1NTU1LS0tLS0tLS0tKSkpKSkpJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu May 07 02:08:50 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.22064 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
