| More suckage... [message #81765] |
Mon, 19 March 2007 17:15  |
![dc[3] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "dc[3] is currently offline")
dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ld A7N8X-e with an XP2800.
>> > >
>> > > best,
>> > >
>> > > jeremy
>> > >
>> > >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: More suckage... [message #81783 is a reply to message #81766] |
Mon, 19 March 2007 19:25  |
Paul Braun
Messages: 391
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
uot;I'll give you something to cry about!"
Finally, I do not agree that men are more likely than women to step up and
protect someone, because my personal experience contradicts that assertion.
I don't like "balls" being synonymous with "courage." I've seen too many
"ballsy" women.
S
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:4624cce1$1@linux...
>
> "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>
>>Women aren't "better" than men, or vice versa. Men and women are "equal,"
>
>>but you may have noticed they are very different. One major difference
>
>>related to aggressive and combative behavior is testosterone, which a male
>
>>typically has 7 to 10 times as much of as a female. Testosterone levels
>
>>rise rapidly, sometimes drastically, with threat, anger, and competition.
>
> And genuine heroism and righteousness.
>
> ooops
>
>
>>Just as girls are taught about their special hormonal differences and
|
|
|
|
| Re: More suckage... [message #81807 is a reply to message #81772] |
Tue, 20 March 2007 08:04 |
Sarah
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
nce there is a known issue with how it handles power
>supplied to it if it doesn't have this fix. Synthax will do it
>under warranty for like $40 including shipping.
>
>If this is the problem, then let me know; I have an extra card
>I can lend you to get you rolling until yours gets back from
>being fixed, and if you need two I can also pull one of the two
>in my PC outta there, since I don't have anything on the
>session front for a least a couple weeks.
>
>Neil
>
>
>"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>Had to call a session tonight and send everyone home. This is the first
>time
>>in my entire studio career that I've not been able to figure out a
>>workaround for a problem in a tracking session, but when your recorder
>>freaks, it's time to wrap. Cubase 4 has gone completely apeshit. Clicks
>and
>>pops, tracks playing back out of sync, suckage of fidelity.....total
>>disaster. The first thing I would normally suspect is the clocking but
>>everything shows to be synced rock solid and I can play back entire (large)
>
>>projects in Cubase 4 that were recorded in Paris and then the tracks were
>
>>imported into Cubase SX 3.0.2 with nary a click, pop or hiccup and this
>is
>>using the AD/DA's that I have here as insert I/O so it's not the converters
>
>>and not the clocking.
>>
>>It's creating a new project in Cubase 4 that is the problem. It is
>>especially problematic when I import an audio track to use for overdubbing.
>>
>>I did go back to an old project in Cubase 3.0.2 and use it for a source
>for
>>a global template and it worked on one out of three projects I was tracking
>
>>tonight.
>>
>>I even uninstalled/reinstalled Cubase 4 and it did no good.
>>
>>The idea of migrating to Reaper is starting to appeal to me more and more.
>I
>>think Reaper even allows inputs to be routed to multiple outputs. That
would
>
>>really be a nice situation for cues in a tracking session.
>>
>>Bah.....I'm tired and PO'ed. Grrrrrrrr!!!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>One more thing, as I keep on saying, the people who should _really_ be able
to carry are women. Much more likely to be victims of violent crime and also
less like to hurt/kill others or themselves accidentally. Oddly, most women
I know are the most anti-gun, until I take them to the range. I've made a
number of converts ;-)
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>I realize the stats can be misleading, and a good statistician can make
them
>say anything anyway. Nevertheless, there _are_ a lot of fatal gun accidents
>in this country. Also, I'm the least likely demographic to be a victim of
>violent crime, I white, male, 6'2", and look a little menacing. So for me,
>having a gun is probably a bad idea, statistically speaking.
>
>But, it's a good idea in the sense that I can walk safely pretty much wherever
>I want, which is something any citizen ought to expect as a matter of course.
>Sadly, in this country we can't. Unfortunately New York State doesn't recognize
>out or state carry permits, so when I'm in NYC I either carry illegally
or
>don't carry. One of my cop friend in New Haven told me he'd rather take
a
>pinch for carrying illegally than be attacked, and that in any case the
fact
>that I have a CT permit would be at least considered by the police if something
>happens.
>
>Anywho, it's odd. The three states I've lived in--Wisconsin, Minnesota,
and
>Connecticut--are some of the bluest of blue states, but are surprisingly
>gun friendly. I guess it's the old farm boy traditions in the midwest, in
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: More suckage... [message #81813 is a reply to message #81807] |
Tue, 20 March 2007 10:00 |
Doug Wellington
Messages: 251
Registered: June 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ertion that "there are too damned many crying men and not
enough heroes" begs that question and is only an assumption, albeit a
common one. Part of the Hollywood cowboy characterization, for example.
I also don't know of any studies that attempt to compare hormonal levels
with empathy levels.
There's a whole lot we don't yet know about the brain and brain
chemistry. But we do know that the brain, like other organs, is not
immune to having functional problems.
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
DC wrote:
> "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>> Well Don, as is often is the case, you seem to be reading what I write,
> and
>> translating it into something
http://www.parisfaqs.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: More suckage... [message #81990 is a reply to message #81977] |
Thu, 22 March 2007 19:57 |
DC
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
re fun as a geek to say 'Are you running Etch in production?' than it is
to say 'Are you at 5.3 yet?' Ubuntu releases are all two words, alliterative,
and the second word is an animal. Feisty Fawn. Edgy Eft. Warty Warthog. The
next big release is 7.10 (an Ubuntu .10 release is sort of the end of the
road for that version) is . . . Gutsy Gibbon.
TCB
"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>Feisty Fawn?? ............when will Salivating Satyr be released?
>
>;o)
>
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:462a26ac$1@linux...
>>
>> OK, I'll try to be nice here. I'm hungover after a long night out with,
>> well,
>> a friend. OS X _might_ be the easy way to run _Unix_, but it has
>> absolutely
>> nothing to do with _linux_. Nothing. Nada. Zip. Zero. Not at the technical
>> level, not at the licensing level, not at the m
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
