Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Paris pics - Rented Donkey etc
| Paris pics - Rented Donkey etc [message #88526] |
Wed, 25 July 2007 05:07  |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ductID=146Yeah, i been lookin' at that one. Wonder how well it works, and
what "kind" of Lexi it sounds like... IOW, closer to a 480L, or
closer to an LXP-1?
Neil
"LaMont" <
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Paris pics - Rented Donkey etc [message #88536 is a reply to message #88535] |
Wed, 25 July 2007 08:28  |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
thanks for the visualIf this does come to pass, I'd lay odds that it absolutely screams on Mac
OSX. Ed and SSC were both Macfolk.
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:46fc1578$1@linux...
>
> "LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>>
>>That's a powerful combo Thad(LIVE & SX), but an updated Paris for Mix and
>>Recording Engineers is very much welcomed.
>>
>>Not everyone wanted not need all of the goodies in SX. When it comes time
>>to mix the $$ jobs, Paris & Pro Tools are no#1 in my book. Notice that I
>>did not say editing.. That dubious spot belongs to SX/Nuendo hands down..
>>
>>So, if an updated Paris did not have a midi sequencer, vsti hosting
>>....But
>>HAD: Total Delay coompensation, even more flexible patchbay routing, and
>>proper Asio2 plugin handling..Wow!!
>>
>>
> Yes, but what if the editing shows up as good or better? Hee hee hee ;
> ) It's all speculation. What if Edmund has been working on Logic for
> Apple
> all this time??? Some of those feature concepts look familiar! We could
> speculate all day; )
>
> It's always fun to dream. What would be on your wish list?
>
>>
>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I'm a capitalist, and I have a hard time a product that has been
>>>essentiall
|
|
|
|
| Re: Paris pics - Rented Donkey etc [message #88537 is a reply to message #88535] |
Wed, 25 July 2007 08:28 |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
y
>>>dormant for five years could possibly compete with products that have
>>>been
>>>out there in the marketplace fighting with each other. I'm happy to look
>>>at anything to see if it's a better mousetrap, but I can't imagine I'll
>>prefer
>>>it to my Live/SX combo rig that I'm running now.
>>>
>>>TCB
>>>
>>>"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>That's harsh.. I'd welcome something new from ID. Paris was still in
>>>>it's
>>>>infacy when they pulled the plug.
>>>>
>>>>I remember Edmund showing me a "working" version of Paris "Native" on
> Mac
>>>>OS back in 2000 NAMM. I mean it was working really good.
>>>>
>>>>So, to have a native VST version of Paris that spealize in Tracking,
>>>>routing,
>>>>mixing would be great. Forget about the midi sequencer, vsti's..
>>>>
>>>>Well??? If he had all that working , then okay..
>>>>I hold any ill feelings to ID what so ever. Only to Creative and EMU.
>
>>>>
>>>>Even more, I stated back in 2000-2002 that EMU made a very bad strategic
>>>>move when it pour most of it's resources into ROmplers. Most of them
>>>>bombed,
>>>>saved for the Planet Phatt module. Now look at them. Can't give away the
>>>>samples for their softsampler. And, to this day, their Audio cards still
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Paris pics - Rented Donkey etc [message #88610 is a reply to message #88544] |
Sun, 29 July 2007 09:04 |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t; HI David,
> Is that file size limit also when using Broadcast Wave? BWF size is 4
> gigs. Does PT have a auto split function at all?
> That would be a pretty big limitation of the Venue system I would think.
> Glad none of th native apps have this limitation. :)
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> EK Sound wrote:
>
>> Hi Rick,
>>
>> I found out that it is PT that has a single file limit of 2GB. That
>> is 2:03:00 at mono 24/96. I was doing a test for a live show coming
>> up that I have to track. I just have to make sure I don't use any
>> stereo tracks and I should be fine.
>>
>> Oh, and here is a lame tidbit of info... this is right from Digi's
>> site...
>>
>> "IDE/ATA & SATA Hard Drives
>>
>> SATA Hard Drives
>>
>> Internal SATA drives are qualified for up to 32 tracks, 24 bit,
>> 44.1/48 kHz with Pro Tools|HD systems on Power Mac G5 models.
>>
>> Dedicated recording drives only, recording to the startup drive is not
>> supported."
>>
>> Seems kinda low, doesn't it... talk about covering your ass!
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David.
>>
>> rick wrote:
>>
>>> yes it does but you can slow the tempo prior to recording and will
>>> gain more time.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:07:12 -0600, EK Sound <askme@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Does the Mac Pro and OSX have a file size limit? I just tried
>>>> recording 48 tracks at 24/96 on HD but it cut out after 2 hours and
>>>> change with a 1.99GB track file size...
>>>>
>>>> Just curious...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> David.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>I thought it said it was capable of streaming 24X24, did I miss something?
"Neil" <IOUIO@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>Still only can stream 12 channels at once - kind of a waste for
>a $1700 unit.
>
>
>
>Chris Ludwig <chrisl@adkproaudio.com> wrote:
>>HI James,
>>Hope it doesn't suffer from the same performance and drivers problems as
>
>>the other models. The Mic-Pre on the other units sound fricking great
>>and these are supposedly better. Hope software side doesn't kill it.
>>
>>Chris
>>
>>
>>James McCloskey wrote:
>>> http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2007/TC-Electronic-Stud io-Konnekt.html
>>
>>--
>>Chris Ludwig
>>
>>ADK Pro Audio
>>(859) 635-5762
>>www.adkproaudio.com
>>chrisl@adkproaudio.com
>I prefer pop cans for shakers, but glass will give you a different
sound. Rice, or any dried grain / legume will make good shaker fill.
David.
John wrote:
> I'm looking to make some simple pro sounding instruments for percussion type
> sounds. Anyone have ideas or sites that have tips?
>
> I'm probably going to start with some glass pop bottles and something very
> hard to get a brig
|
|
|
|
| Re: Paris pics - Rented Donkey etc [message #88611 is a reply to message #88550] |
Sun, 29 July 2007 09:06 |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ht ping out of. Also, some 16 oz pop bottles with rice
> in them maybe for shakers. Any ideas? I'm looking for great sounds.
>
> ThanksHI David,
Yes very odd PT stuff.
We usually setup our live MADI systems that have 128 ch MADI setup so
that each MADI cards tracks are going to their own drive. Example tracks
1-64 drive 1, tracks 65-128 drive 2. of course divide by 2 for 96k. This
seems to be the overall safe point for the live systems. You have to
factor having the drives start to slow down as they start to get full.
We use Cubase/Nuendo for this stuff so it's easy to set multiple record
paths in a project. We don't have deal with Raid arrays and all that crap.
Chris
EK Sound wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Yep, that was using BW. This is a ProTools limitation, and I agree a
> surprising one at that. I was quite shocked that Digi says I can only
> record 12 simultaneous tracks onto one drive at 24/96, even though I did
> a 2 hour test recording 48 tracks to one drive! On a recent Sarah
> McLachlan tour, they recorded 60 tracks at 24/96 to two drives over 60
> separate dates without issue.
>
> David.
>
> Chris Ludwig wrote:
>
>> HI David,
>> Is that file size limit also when using Broadcast Wave? BWF size is 4
>> gigs. Does PT have a auto split function at all?
>> That would be a pretty big limitation of the Venue system I would think.
>> Glad none of th native apps have this limitation. :)
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> EK Sound wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rick,
>>>
>>> I found out that it is PT that has a single file limit of 2GB. That
>>> is 2:03:00 at mono 24/96. I was doing a test for a live show coming
>>> up that I have to track. I just have to make sure I don't use any
>>> stereo tracks and I should be fine.
>>>
>>> Oh, and here is a lame tidbit of info... this is right from Digi's
>>> site...
>>>
>>> "IDE/ATA & SATA Hard Drives
>>>
>>> SATA Hard Drives
>>>
>>> Internal SATA drives are qualified for up to 32 tracks, 24 bit,
>>> 44.1/48 kHz with Pro Tools|HD systems on Power Mac G5 models.
>>>
>>> Dedicated recording drives only, recording to the startup drive is
>>> not supported."
>>>
>>> Seems kinda low, doesn't it... talk about covering your ass!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> David.
>>>
>>> rick wrote:
>>>
>>>> yes it does but you can slow the tempo prior to recording and will
>>>> gain more time.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:07:12 -0600, EK Sound <askme@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Does the Mac Pro and OSX have a file size limit? I just tried
>>>>> recording 48 tracks at 24/96 on HD but it cut out after 2 hours and
>>>>> change with a 1.99GB track file size...
>>>>>
>>>>> Just curious...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> David.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
--
Chris Ludwig
ADK Pro Audio
(859) 635-5762
www.adkproaudio.com
chrisl@adkproaudio.comeven when i read i still don't get it...just shoot me...
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:17:46 -0600, EK Sound <askme@nospam.com> wrote:
>Well... it started as a logic question... ;-)
>
>David.
>
>rick wrote:
>
>> ya know...i really have to read the posts when i'm more
>> awake...somehow i thought it was a logic question. i think i've been
>> away from cigarettes and booze for too long...must correct soon or
>> i'll become even more me.
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:05:10 -0600, EK Sound <askme@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi Rick,
>>>
>>>I found out that it is PT that has a single file limit of 2GB. That
>>>is 2:03:00 at mono 24/96. I was doing a test for a live show coming
>>>up that I have to track. I just have to make sure I don't use any
>>>stereo tracks and I should be fine.
>>>
>>>Oh, and here is a lame tidbit of info... this is right from Digi's site...
>>>
>>>"IDE/AT
|
|
|
|
| Re: Paris pics - Rented Donkey etc [message #88623 is a reply to message #88530] |
Mon, 30 July 2007 08:24 |
Rich[3]
Messages: 132
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
DoubleClick are allowed to merge, Google will
become
> the overwhelmingly dominant pipeline for all forms of online advertising."
>
> "Now, this merger will almost certainly result in higher profits for the
> operator of the dominant advertising pipeline, but we believe it will be
> bad for everyone else. It will be bad for publishers, it will be bad for
> advertisers and, most importantly, it will be bad for consumers."
>
> In other words, Mr. Smith is suggesting, Google will become like
Microsoft!
>
>
> I hope somebody in Washington remembers the honor roll of companies that
> Microsoft put out of business by leveraging its own monopoly of the
desktop
> operating system.
>
> If they've forgotten, I'd be happy to dig through old trade confirmations
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun May 17 20:53:13 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05417 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
