| OT:Vinyl junkies,DJ's Turntablist [message #95481] |
Sun, 03 February 2008 16:59  |
Nappy
Messages: 198 Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;>>> entering/editing text right there. If you want to create a new page,
> you
>>>> just type a "CamelCase" word as you're editing (any word with an
> initial
>>> cap
>>>> and another capital within it, like AppMessage) and when you "store"
> the
>>>> page the cunning macros behind the Wiki turn it into a hyperlink with
> dashes
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT:Vinyl junkies,DJ's Turntablist [message #95491 is a reply to message #95481] |
Sun, 03 February 2008 21:42   |
TCB
Messages: 1261 Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ed in to the Wiki - uploading
> 4) Logged in to the Wiki - downloading
>
> If you try this out, let me know in this thread what your success/failure
> was like in each condition, and once I have enough info I'll go ahead and
> create something similar for each plugin.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> - Kerry
>
> PS: no need to upload FX presets quite yet, I want to sort the best format
> options out first so all users regardless of OS or PARIS version can make
> immediate use of the presets.
>
> PPS: If you think of other types of PARIS-related files it might be handy
> to
> create upload/download functionality for on the Wiki - PARIS wallpaper,
> skins, track sheets, tables, cheatsheets - I'm happy to entertain
> suggestions.
>
> - K.
>So...
The Telco says it's not their problem. I say it's not mine.
It MIGHT be the cable from the street to the house, but who knows.
Suffice to say I'm going to have to get them
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT:Vinyl junkies,DJ's Turntablist [message #95493 is a reply to message #95491] |
Mon, 04 February 2008 00:31  |
Nappy
Messages: 198 Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
present and check their work.
>
> That said, the group, for me at least, usually works, which is, err,
> better
> than usually not working. ;o)
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.Funny you should say that you know, because when you call the fault line
there is an option to test your line before talking to anybody. I selected
that and after a few seconds it said "This function is currently unavailable"
and I moved on, and yet once I spoke with somebody they offered to test it.
Perhaps their tests aren't working?
That said, they are not debating that there is a fault.
I can ring them back now and hammer them a bit more. I've tested a few pieces
of gear and nothing works properly, and the other "tell all" is that I can
kinda tell from the weather and time of day whether it will be working. If
it's midday and sunny and 25C then it's fine, but if it's 6am and raining
then it will barely connect. That's usually a cable issue for mine.
So I'll just have to call them and get another tech out, preferably this
weekend so I can be there. If it's between the house and the street though
I have to pay, but I don't think it's stupidly expensive so hey...
Cheers,
Kim.
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>> It MIGHT be the cable from the street to the house, but who knows
>
>If it's a cable, test it with standard CAT test equipment like a Fluke
>MicroScanner.
>
>If it's fiber, make them test it for dB loss or hit it with an OTDR. Or
use
>a 4.9mW red laser to look for leaks/bends/fractures/reflection issues...
>
>Do you know perhaps, IF it's fiber, is the fiber running single or
>multimode? (FYI, single is faster, more sensitive)
>
>Tell you a funny story about the local cable company. I moved a few years
>ago, twice (not recommended). While in my interim place, I decided to go
>ahead and get c
|
|
|
|